Walking the Talk

Page 168

WALKING THE TALK

Engaging communities in resource allocation decisions Empowering PHC teams and communities helps to improve participation in decision-making with respect to how resources are allocated to respond to population health needs (WHO 2018d). Transferring decision-making to local governments can enable better alignment between resource allocation and community needs (WHO 2018d). For example, some countries have moved to “participatory budgeting,” which allows communities to have direct decision-making powers over the allocation of public resources in their area (Campbell et al. 2018). The model, which requires formal evaluations to understand its impact, is gaining popularity as a means of empowering communities to adequately fund local priorities. In Brazil, for example, the wide adoption of this approach across municipalities has led to increased expenditure on basic sanitation and primary health care services, which were previously underfinanced. An evaluation study also found a significant reduction in infant mortality rates among municipalities that adopted participatory budgeting (Gonçalves 2014). In Nigeria, ward development committees (WDCs) were established by volunteer community members to advocate for the health and social needs of their communities and give them autonomy over the utilization of funds for PHC improvements and outreach activities. A functioning and responsive complaints mechanism was also established. Five percent of the BHCPF was set aside specifically for fund administration, including setting up this robust mechanism to receive and respond to community complaints (Hafez 2018).

From fragility to resilience As COVID-19 has made clear, shocks like global pandemics may require considerable additional health service spending, while severely reducing government capacity to raise revenues. Flexible financing systems can enable more resilient systems that can adapt to shocks with appropriate response measures, maintain essential PHC services during a crisis, and rapidly disburse sufficient financial protection to citizens.

Surging resources to the front lines Unpredictable crises typically require extraordinary resource mobilization and deployment. Experience in past public health emergencies suggests that additional health sector funding is often needed for the following: ++ 144

Core population-based functions essential for responding to shocks, including comprehensive surveillance, data and information systems; regulation; and communication and information campaigns


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

What will the World Bank do?

6min
pages 219-221

Recommendations for donors and the international health community

1min
page 218

References

50min
pages 182-208

Recommendations for countries

9min
pages 213-217

human capital

1min
page 179

Conclusions

1min
page 180

Notes

1min
page 181

Building skills for multisectoral action among PHC practitioners

3min
pages 174-175

Financing multisectoral engagement

5min
pages 176-178

From fragility to resilience

11min
pages 168-173

A partnership to support primary health care

2min
page 167

From inequities to fairness and accountability

5min
pages 164-166

mechanisms and team-based care models

9min
pages 159-163

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

1min
page 158

resource allocation

10min
pages 153-157

revenue?

3min
pages 151-152

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

1min
page 150

Priority Reform 3: Fit-for-purpose financing for public-health-enabled primary care

1min
page 149

Social and practical support for a resilient health workforce

1min
page 148

From inequities to fairness and accountability

9min
pages 140-144

From fragility to resilience

5min
pages 145-147

practice

5min
pages 137-139

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 135-136

Priority Reform 2: The fit-for-purpose multiprofessional health workforce

1min
page 127

From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality, comprehensive care for all

13min
pages 128-134

From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 125-126

From inequities to fairness and accountability

7min
pages 121-124

4.1 Why team-based care?

13min
pages 108-114

From fragmentation to people-centered integration

9min
pages 115-119

sharing in primary health care

2min
page 120

and priority reforms

2min
pages 106-107

3.8 What has to change: Sectoral silos inhibit collaboration

2min
page 96

References

11min
pages 98-104

Foundations for change: Enabling multisectoral action in PHC

8min
pages 92-95

Shift 4: From fragility to resilience

3min
pages 86-87

3.4 What has to change: Discontinuous delivery

4min
pages 81-82

health care inequities

3min
pages 84-85

Shift 3: From inequities to fairness and accountability

1min
page 83

Shift 2: From fragmentation to people-centered integration

3min
pages 79-80

Shift 1: From dysfunctional gatekeeping to quality comprehensive care for all

2min
page 76

Implications for primary health care

7min
pages 63-66

by income group and geographic location, 1950–2100

3min
pages 53-54

Policy recommendations

1min
page 30

1 Key recommendations for fit-for-purpose primary

1min
page 29

quality gaps

4min
pages 77-78

1.1 Defining primary health care

4min
pages 43-44

What the World Bank and its partners will do

1min
page 31
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.