February 1, 2024 Student Life newspaper, Washington University in St. Louis

Page 1

The independent newspaper of Washington University in St. Louis since 1878 THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2024

VOLUME 145, NO. 15

#HARDYSTRONG

WWW.STUDLIFE.COM

BEARFIT CLASSES

How to spice up your workout routine (Scene, pg 5)

Basketball honors Hardy’s legacy. (Sports, pg 8)

AI ON CAMPUS

WashU releases its own ChatGPT (Scene, pg 3)

Students protest Prof. Dybvig’s continued employment amid sexual misconduct allegations LILY TAYLOR SENIOR NEWS EDITOR

Students protested the continued employment of Washington University professor and Nobel Prize winner Philip Dybvig. Multiple former students alleged that he engaged in inappropriate conduct. The protest occurred outside Dybvig’s classroom, Jan. 16. Protestors expressed dissatisfaction with the University’s handling of the allegations against Dybvig and called for him to be fired. MeToo WashU also created a petition calling to fire Dybvig, which has garnered nearly 1,000 signatures. Students who attended the Jan. 16 protest, which was organized by MeToo WashU, have since been contacted by the Office of Student Conduct over allegations of violating campus protest policies, but were not found guilty of violations. Multiple graduate students, most of whom are Asian, spoke to Student Life about allegations of misconduct against Dybvig beginning in Oct. 2022. At the time, Dybvig was on a scheduled sabbatical, but is currently teaching two classes for graduate students in the Olin Business School. Senior Erin Ritter and sophomore Sonal Churiwal attended the protest outside Dybvig’s classroom. They said they wanted students in Dybvig’s class to be made aware of the allegations against him. After the protest, they said that multiple students in his classes

COURTESY OF METOO WASHU Students held handmade signs at the protest against Dybvig’s continued employment. approached them to say that they had not heard about the allegations of misconduct. “They didn’t know about the allegations and were almost surprised that there was this kind of huge thing about their professor that they didn’t know about,” Churiwal said. She said that she believes the University has a responsibility to fire Dybvig, but also to communicate more clearly with students about how the inquiry into Dybvig is being handled. “The University hasn’t

communicated what at all they’re doing to protect students,” Churiwal said. “Are there going to be proctors in his office hours? Are students still going in alone with the door shut?” Ritter added that she believes the University’s messaging about Dybvig’s inquiry has been unclear and creates an unsafe environment for students. “The language that was used to describe Dybvig is that he’s under inquiry by the Title IX office,” Ritter said. “We have no idea what that means. What does it mean to be under inquiry…We have no idea what the University is doing at this point.” Student Life reached out to the Title IX office for further comment on Dybvig’s inquiry, but it did not make a comment. Julie Flory, Vice Chancellor for Marketing and Communications, also declined to comment. Churiwal talked about whether the University would be taking on a greater level of legal liability if they made the choice to terminate an employee under investigation for misconduct. She said that she

believes they assume more risk by keeping Dybvig on. “If there was to be another case [in which Dybvig is accused of harassment], I think there’s a very valid argument there that the University is liable for that, because they have knowledge that this person has been accused of being a perpetrator and haven’t communicated at all what they’re doing,” Churiwal said. Churiwal also said that she believes the University should take more action to protect students, even without a legal ruling on the allegations. “There’s widely reported allegations coming from seven students,” Churiwal said. “If the University doesn’t have a legal mechanism to investigate that and act upon that and revisit the conversation surrounding his tenure, that is probably an issue.” Rob Wild, Dean of Student Affairs, did not comment on the details of the inquiry because he said they are not in his purview, but he expressed confidence in the proper enforcement of University policies.

“The University has an obligation to respond if there’s wrongdoing that’s discovered in the investigation,” Wild said. “I don’t have access to that information, but I trust my colleagues in the administrative offices that respond in this situation.” After students protested outside Dybvig’s classroom on Jan. 16, Churiwal and Ritter said they received emails from the Office of Student Conduct requiring them to report to the office for a meeting about a report of alleged violations of the Code of Conduct. The students were investigated by the Office of Student Conduct for possible violations of the following policies: “Interfering with the rights of of members of the university community to engage in educational…activities, failure to comply with the reasonable and lawful requests of university officials…, knowing or recklessly violating a publishes University policy…”

SEE DYBVIG, PAGE 3

MeToo WashU elicits mixed reactions after statements about Israel-Gaza conflict ALIANA MEDIRATTA JULIA ROBBINS JUNIOR NEWS EDITOR INVESTIGATIVE NEWS EDITOR

MeToo WashU, an advocacy Instagram account for survivors of sexual violence, has become a microcosm of the larger tensions on campus around Israel and Palestine following two posts published on its account, Nov. 29 and Dec. 11. The posts speak out against the use of sexual violence in the war, referencing harm inflicted both by Hamas and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). They also opposed Israeli state practices, “reaffirm[ing] support for the right to a free, unoccupied Palestine.” MeToo has posted several times about political issues in the past, including in support of Ukraine and opposing the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The last time that

the account posted in reference to Palestine was on May 23, 2021, in a post that stated it “unequivocally condemn[s] the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people by the Israeli government.” Users in support of the posts state they are anti-Zionist and prosurvivor, with some endorsing the account’s condemnation of Israeli state practices that they view as genocidal. Those opposed to the post expressed that the group employed a “double standard” in how the account treated Palestinian and Israeli Jewish survivors of sexual violence. WashU Hillel Rabbi Jordan Gerson said that the timing of MeToo’s posts relative to Hamas’ attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, which came 53 days after the initial attacks, was problematic. “It’s challenging to see that it

took so long for an organization, whose whole existence is about calling out sexual assault, rape, harassment, to recognize the atrocities that happened over Oct. 7 to the Israeli women and even non-Israeli women,” Gerson said. “It’s unimaginable that this organization that is so quick to call out perpetrators of crimes said nothing.” Account representatives from MeToo sent a statement via Instagram to Student Life addressing this criticism. “The delay in our initial statement was mostly due to internal disagreement within our team as to whether or not we should post a statement,” MeToo wrote in its statement. “However, as we saw more and more localized impacts from the genocide abroad, including violence against students on college campuses, we felt it was

necessary to speak out.” Gerson also said he thought the account posted about Israeli victims to avoid criticism for recognizing only Palestinian victims. “It’s clear that there was an understanding that if they didn’t say anything about [Hamas’ violence]...that they would get called out for not saying anything,” Gerson said. “It does not seem like they did it with genuine interest and care about the Israeli survivors of sexual assault, perpetrated by Hamas.” MeToo told Student Life that it opposes all instance of sexual violence, including against Israeli women. “This was a core component of our initial statement, and not an afterthought,” they wrote. Aside from the timeline of the posts, some community members also took issue with their content,

CONTACT BY POST

CONTACT BY EMAIL

CONTACT BY PHONE

ONE BROOKINGS DRIVE #1039 #320 DANFORTH UNIVERSITY CENTER ST. LOUIS, MO 63130-4899

EDITOR@STUDLIFE.COM NEWS@STUDLIFE.COM CALENDAR@STUDLIFE.COM

NEWSROOM 314.935.5995 ADVERTISING 314.935.4240 FAX 314.935.5938

rebuking what they saw as unequal outrage against sexual violence inflicted against Palestinians versus Israelis. Like Gerson, junior Samantha Kanner, who is Jewish, took issue with the difference in language and focus when comparing how the posts discussed sexual violence against Palestinians versus Israelis. “They have a text slide with a ton of things and details about Palestinian survivors and what they’ve endured and how they unequivocally stand with them,” Kanner said. “[The post said] ‘We are saddened that feminists and survivor support organizations have failed to support Israeli survivors,’” she said. “How about [writing] ‘we are outraged?’”

SEE METOO, PAGE 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.