Tugyan Kepkep - Portfolio

Page 1

PORTFOLIO

TUGYAN KEPKEP

Landscape Architect, MA

CONTENT / CV .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 / WORKS // COMPETITIONS /// Salacak Urban Design Competition // Equivalent Mention (2020) ..........................................................................................................................6 /// Home2030 Competition (2020) .................................................................................................................................................................................................10 /// International Bandirma Park Competition // 4th Mention (2017) .............................................................................................................................12 /// Konyaalti Cost and Coastal Recreation Idea Project Competition // Equivalent Mention (2014) ..........................................................16 // PROJECTS /// Planning Application Projects (2021-2023) ..........................................................................................................................................................................18 /// Apple Project (2021) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................22 /// Amaala Triple Bay Public Realm (2021) ...............................................................................................................................................................................24 /// Trendy Group Head Quarters (2019) ......................................................................................................................................................................................28 /// AND Pastel (2017) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................32 /// Anamur Atatepe Social Center (2015) ...................................................................................................................................................................................36 /// Juma Vadi Residential Project (2015) ....................................................................................................................................................................................40 // Pamukkale Culture, Art and Social Center (2015) .............................................................................................................................................................44
4 \ COVER LETTER

CV / PERSONAL DETAILS

Name: Tugyan Kepkep

Date and Place of Birth: 12.10.1988, Istanbul

E-mail: tugyan.kepkep@gmail.com

Telephone: +44 (0) 7380201201

Address: Ground Floor Flat, 47 Mayton Street, London, N7 6QP

EDUCATION

2014 - Present PhD, Landscape Architecture, Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Istanbul

2012 - 2013 MA, History and Critical Thinking, Architectural Association, London

2006 - 2011 B.Sc., Landscape Architecture, Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Istanbul

2008 - 2009 Erasmus Exchange Programme, Landscape Architecture, Ecole National Supérieure d’Architecture et de Paysage de Bordeaux, Bordeaux

SKILLS

Language Turkish: Native Speaker

English: Fluent

French: Basic

Software AutoCAD, Vectorworks, Adobe Suit (psd, ind, ai), SketchUp, Microsoft Office

WORK EXPERIENCE

2021 - 2022 Erlam Studio

2021 - 2022 John Davies Landscape

2020 - 2021 SKAB Landscape, Urban and Architecture Design, London

2019 - 2020 Cameo & Partners, London

2018 - 2019 DHL, London

2014 - 2017 TYLA, Istanbul

2010 - 2012 Editor, EkoYapi Magazine, Istanbul

COMPETITIONS / AWARDS

2020 Equivalent Mention Salacak Urban Design Competition

2020 Home2030

2017 19 May Path Urban Design Competition

2017 4th Mention International Bandirma Park Competition

2016 1st Mention Sucuzade Area Urban Design and Project Competition

2015 Equivalent Mention Gaziemir Aktepe and Emrez Neighborhoods Urban Regeneration Competition

2014 Equivalent Mention Konyaalti Coast and Coastal Recreation Idea Project Competition

2014 Equivalent Mention Çanakkale Social Housing Area Urban Regeneration National Architectural Competition

OTHER WORKS

2021 - 2023 Visiting Tutor in Landscape Architecture Studio Class, Istanbul Technical University (ITU)

2015 - 2016 / ITU Research Project: Spatial Representation of Time: Commemoration, Memorialisation and Memorial Spaces

2014 - 2016 / ITU PhD Studies:

Wasted Lives and Spaces of City

Google Earth and Shift in Visual Perspective

2014 Sensible Cities: Interview with Carlo Ratti, EkoIQ Magazine, Issue 38

2012 - 2013 / AA Master Thesis: To The Clouds And Back: The Journey of The Body

2012 - 2013 / AA MA Studies:

Landownership in Jerusalem: Interview with Maximillian Jan Sternberg on architecture and social issues of Jerusalem

Old and New h city planning in modern architecture

Looking Through The Wall: Analysing the terms border and heterotopia in the works of Abramovic, Banksy and Dreyfus

2010 - 2012 / EkoYapi Magazine

Negative Can Be Turned Into Positive: Interview w. Saskia Sassen (Issue 11)

Mannahatta Project: Interview w. Dr. Eric Sanderson (Issue 10)

Learning Architecture Through Practice: Rural Studio (Issue 5)

CV / 5

SALACAK URBAN DESIGN COMPETITION

Prize: Equivalent Mention

Year: 2020

Location: Istanbul, Turkey

Organizer: Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality

Team: Alican Çırakoglu, Ilgın Avcı, Tugyan Kepkep, Seyma Çakır, Batuhan Kumru, Aslıhan Sücüllü, Merve Özcan, Münür Özçelik

The history of Salacak sea-cost has been shaped by the cultural richness of two ends of, Üsküdar and Kadıköy. Salacak has a significant place in urban memory as the location where Üsküdar meets with sea. However recent interventions has damaged its natural characteristics and this caused the loss of public’s connection with the sea and loss of spatial identity.

The proposal aims to recover what has been lost through simple and holistic interventions and reconstruct the memory of “The Sea”. Istanbul Bosporus has been approached as a unique scene in which the project enables to create different views at it. The sea-land relation has been continued all through out the project as a spine which in parts has sharp, other parts has a blending structure.

There are three main focus; Üsküdar square with Semsi Pasa Mosque built by Architect Sinan, old Bus Terminal, and Maiden’s Tower. They all have been evaluated as separate focus points, unified by the coastal line and vegetation characteristics. Üsküdar Square forms the historic, more traditional approach. Bus Terminal area presents a new urban open area for locals where social activities can be carried out. Maiden’s Tower location serves as the ideal location for social and touristic focus point. With proposed concrete canopy, it serves as the main view point.

Another important issue was transportation. The existing high-traffic road has been replaced with trams and bicycle roads, leaving only one lane for cars. Pedestrian lines have been enhanced and promoted through the spine.

The vegetation characteristic of the area has been preserved. Proposed plants have been chosen from unique plants from Bosporus flora. In addition to this, the area’s inefficient water management problem has been solved with rain gardens stretching though out the transportation line.

6 \ COMPETITIONS
COMPETITIONS / 7
8 \ COMPETITIONS
COMPETITIONS / 9

HOME 2030

Year: 2020

Location: UK

Organizer: HM Government

Team: Ipek Kuzu, Irem Dökmeci, Tugyan Kepkep

The goal of this proposal is to raise a holistic spatial approach which places social interaction at its core while both financially and environmentally benefiting actors of the built environment. The architectural design undertakes the role of creating a social environment that allows people to connect with their community through sharing, producing and identity building, while operational components provide a blueprint for the construction sector. The project carries out a cradle-to-cradle approach with all its operational and material components through a significant consideration into the whole building cycle, from business point of view to technical, constructional, management and finally deconstruction phases. The proposal aims to reach the net-zero-carbon goal and minimise environmental impact by combining multiple complementing strategies. In order to achieve these goals, these strategies not only take into consideration using modern technologies, but also a shift in operational and social aspects of design.

In design research, the main focus was on the social connection and how to develop a design narrative through it. In addition to expectations on social aspects of the competition brief, recent events have also shed a light on the fundamental importance of the sense of community and what it currently lacks. As the paradigm of daily life has shifted for good, current understanding of home is obliged to follow it. The confinement of a home is not sufficient, and this applies for every person. Daily life at home is expanding beyond this, creating a new network of places. This situation unveils the question of spatial privacy, especially in a society where individuality and ownership are considered as priority. In addition to this, a research1 shows that one of the biggest problems in the housing industry is the lack of acknowledgement for vulnerable people such as the elderly and people with disabilities, and their need for accessible spaces. Regarding these social concerns, embracing environmental goals and adopting a democratic approach in the sense of both material and spatial aspects constructed the fundamentals of our proposal. In this degree, the social demographic of the houses and communal areas of the project aims to be inclusive of all ages, categorised as 0-18, 18-60, +60; and lifestyles, categorised as single, couple, single parent, small and large family, cross generation and finally shared living.

10 \ COMPETITIONS
COMPETITIONS / 11

INTERNATIONAL BANDIRMA PARK COMPETITION

Prize: 4th Mention

Year: 2017

Location: Bandirma, Turkey

Organizer: Bandirma Municipality

Team: Tarık Yasar, Nurhak Inan Karacay, Ilker Ertugrul, Tugyan Kepkep, Bengi Altunay, Basa Enuysal, Ali Talha Koc

The project’s primary aim is to create an attraction center not only for Bandırma’s local population but also for visitors and close by settlements. In order to support this, a macro-scaled strategy plan has been developed by studying eight main subjects; Utilization diversity, Transportation, Green space, Water, Climate, Morphology, Demography and Application model. Carrying out these topics from macro to micro scale, a new urban pattern has been designed by referencing the existing natural and man-made interventions on the area. The project proposes an infiltrating layout of structures within the gaps provided by the existing conditions. Without any zoning, the project simply aims to settle where the area naturally leads to. This approach leads the architectural programme into a fragmented structure where the natural parameters such as making use of natural light and orienting towards the scenery defines the main characteristics. The institute building has been divided into two parts that are elevated from the ground level, allowing the preservation of the existing pattern. The cores of the blocks that connects the institute with the ground level are placed upon elevated platforms that can implement diverse programmes. The retail function has been divided into two parts, and following the existing building scale of Bandirma these parts are divided into smaller units. The four-starred hotel rooms are positioned on existing concrete blocks whereas the five-starred hotel’s form is associated with the existing concrete platforms. Both hard and softscape designs of the landscape also references the existing conditions in design and material. The proposed plantation strategy takes into account the prevention of erosion, providing feed for existing animals and requiring no maintenance. The choice of materials also follows the existing conditions. The natural stone that comes out from the local quarry and talus that is used as the main ingredient in mosaic pavements is proposed to be used.

12 \ COMPETITIONS
COMPETITIONS / 13
14 \ COMPETITIONS
COMPETITIONS / 15

KONYAALTI COAST AND COASTAL RECREATION IDEA PROJECT COMPETITION

Prize: Equivalent Mention

Year: 2014

Location: Konyaalti, Antalya, Turkey

Organizer: Antalya Metropolitan Municipality

Team: Tarık Yasar, Tugyan Kepkep, Gulce Kanturer, Caner Olcusenler, Alican Karalar

The project aims to generate an urban strategy while preserving and restoring the macro planing decisions. The design makes use of the potentials of 7 km long waterfront through protecting existing natural elements and increase the urban utilization. The project proposes to remove the existing road that has a high density of traffic and detaches the city and the sea.

A new space design has been proposed in between the waterfront’s high and low levels to open access to daily social activities and related utilizations such as storage, security and relation.

16 \ COMPETITIONS
COMPETITIONS / 17

PLANNING APPLICATION PROJECTS

Year: 2021-2023

Location: UK

Landscape Project: John Davies Landscape

Following three new residential development projects are samples from several which were focused exclusively on planning application. The work involved producing the complete landscape design package from design development to preparing all necessary documentations including Design Statement, Landscape Management Plan and Urban Greening Factor Report.

Eastcote Lane, Harrow, HA2

18 \ PROJECTS
8RW
PROJECTS / 19 Eastcote Lane, Harrow, HA2 8RW

Lynton Grange, London, N2 9EU

20 \ PROJECTS Surface Cover Type Factor Area (m ) Contribution Semi-natural vegetation (e.g. trees, woodland, species-rich grassland) maintained or established on site. 1.00 0.00 0.00 Wetland or open water (semi-natural; not chlorinated) maintained or established on site. 1.00 0.00 0.00 Intensive green roof or vegetation over structure. Substrate minimum settled depth of 150mm. 0.80 0.00 0.00 Standard trees planted in connected tree pits with a minimum soil volume equivalent to at least two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree. 0.80 18.20 14.56 Extensive green roof with substrate of minimum settled depth of 80mm (or 60mm beneath vegetation blanket) –meets the requirements of GRO Code 2014. 0.70 55.80 39.06 Flower-rich perennial planting. 0.70 57.30 40.11 Rain gardens and other vegetated sustainable drainage elements. 0.70 0.00 0.00 Hedges (line of mature shrubs one or two shrubs wide). 0.60 10.60 6.36 Standard trees planted in pits with soil volumes less than two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree. 0.60 7.00 4.20 Green wall –modular system or climbers rooted in soil. 0.60 137.80 82.68 Groundcover planting. 0.50 0.00 0.00 Amenity grassland (species-poor, regularly mown lawn). 0.40 60.60 24.24 Extensive green roof of sedum mat or other lightweight systems that do not meet GRO Code 2014. 0.30 0.00 0.00 Water features (chlorinated) or unplanted detention basins. 0.20 0.00 0.00 Permeable paving. 0.10 180.90 18.09 Sealed surfaces (e.g. concrete, asphalt, waterproofing, stone). 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Contribution Total Site Area (m2) Urban Greening Factor (Total contribution/Site Area) 229.30 574 0.40 URBAN GREENING FACTOR CALCULATION Materials

URBAN GREENING FACTOR CALCULATION

PROJECTS / 21 Surface Cover Type Factor Area (m²) Contribution Semi-natural vegetation (e.g. trees, woodland, species-rich grassland) maintained or established on site. 1.00 44.40 44.40 Wetland or open water (semi-natural; not chlorinated) maintained or established on site. 1.00 0.00 0.00 Intensive green roof or vegetation over structure. Substrate minimum settled depth of 150mm. 0.80 0.00 0.00 Standard trees planted in connected tree pits with a minimum soil volume equivalent to at least two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree. 0.80 66.00 52.80 Extensive green roof with substrate of minimum settled depth of 80mm (or 60mm beneath vegetation blanket) –meets the requirements of GRO Code 2014. 0.70 273.30 191.31 Flower-rich perennial planting. 0.70 140.00 98.00 Rain gardens and other vegetated sustainable drainage elements. 0.70 0.00 0.00 Hedges (line of mature shrubs one or two shrubs wide). 0.60 29.50 17.70 Standard trees planted in pits with soil volumes less than two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree. 0.60 66.00 39.60 Green wall –modular system or climbers rooted in soil. 0.60 203.60 122.16 Groundcover planting. 0.50 0.00 0.00 Amenity grassland (species-poor, regularly mown lawn). 0.40 45.40 18.16
Surface Cover Type Factor Area (m ) Contribution Semi-natural vegetation (e.g. trees, woodland, species-rich grassland) maintained or established on site. 1.00 44.40 44.40 Wetland or open water (semi-natural; not chlorinated) maintained or established on site. 1.00 0.00 0.00 Intensive green roof or vegetation over structure. Substrate minimum settled depth of 150mm. 0.80 0.00 0.00 Standard trees
at least two thirds of the
canopy area of the mature tree. 0.80 66.00 52.80 Extensive green roof with substrate of
settled depth of 80mm (or 60mm beneath vegetation blanket) –meets the requirements of GRO Code 2014. 0.70 273.30 191.31 Flower-rich perennial planting. 0.70 140.00 98.00 Rain gardens and other vegetated sustainable drainage elements. 0.70 0.00 0.00 Hedges (line of mature shrubs one or two shrubs wide). 0.60 29.50 17.70 Standard trees planted in pits with soil volumes less than two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree. 0.60 66.00 39.60 Green wall –modular system or climbers rooted in soil. 0.60 203.60 122.16 Groundcover planting. 0.50 0.00 0.00 Amenity grassland (species-poor, regularly mown lawn). 0.40 45.40 18.16 Extensive green roof of sedum mat or other lightweight systems that do not meet GRO Code 2014. 0.30 0.00 0.00 Water features (chlorinated) or unplanted detention basins. 0.20 0.00 0.00 Permeable paving. 0.10 333.70 33.37 Sealed surfaces (e.g. concrete, asphalt, waterproofing, stone). 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Contribution Total Site Area (m2) Urban Greening Factor (Total contribution/Site Area) 617.50 1475 0.42 URBAN GREENING FACTOR CALCULATION First Floor Plan Third Floor Plan Fourth Floor Plan Roof Plan Hindes Road, Harrow, HA1 1SP
planted in connected tree pits with a minimum soil volume equivalent to
projected
minimum

APPLE Project

Year: 2021 - 2022

Location: Windelsham, England

Architectural Project: Heatherwick Studio & Veretec

Landscape Project: Erlam Studio

Landscape design of Apple Project aims to evolve the existing qualities of the site and present an inviting and productive environment for the new users of the site. The vision for the concept landscape design involved developing a vision to transform and add value to the already mature and abundant 47 acre site by injecting new life and making it an inspiring location to work.

Upper Meadow: set of landforms and planting providing series of spaces for exploration

Forest Garden: enclosed productive planting and composting

Medicinal Courtyard: plants selected for medicinal properties

The Prospect: sculpted landforms weaving together different adjacent spaces

Gardener’s building re-purposed as meeting / working space with outdoor terrace

Manor Gardens: revitalised planting and layout respecting historic setting

Pollinator Garden : landscape destination garden with focus on pollinator plants

Potential new location for gardeners compound or new tennis courts connected to main lawn by woodland walk.

Potential new deliveries and storage facility

Arrival and welcome- enhanced way-finding

Pedestrian arrival footpaths journey though woodland to reveal of new building

Lush planting cascading down to lower level around new building

22 \ PROJECTS
Building A Building B Building D Building G Building F Building H Building C Building E

Key

New tree planting

Planting around building H, including medicinal plants to the rear courtyard

Woodland under-storey planting

Shrub planting

Perennial planting

Swathes of meadow grass

Feature planting within orchard

Pollinator garden

Productive forest garden

Vehicle and Pedestrian Movement

Existing vehicle routes retained Adjusted vehicle route, material changed for pedestrian priority but allowing for vehicles and emergency access

Fire path with revised alignment Existing footpaths retained New pedestrian pathways Wider pedestrian circulation through the landscape

Potential walking/cycling route around site perimeter

PROJECTS / 23
Woodland Arrival
Brain Arrival
Medicinal Courtyard Upper Meadow Lower Meadow Existing Condition Existing Condition Transformation into Wetland Biodiversity Rich Result West Wood 0 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Years 5 Years De-Cluttering Introducing Different Varieties Biodiversity Rich Result

Amaala Triple Bay Public Realm

Year: 2021

Location: Saudi Arabia

Landscape Project: Martha Schwartz & SKAB

Amaala Triple Bay is a coastal development project in Saudi Arabia designed by Martha Schwartz in collaboration with SKAB. The projects focuses on developing a masterplan for connecting marina, wellness core and Equestrian Hotel. In order to connect these three sites a Wellness Route strategy was developed which focuses on preserving, exploring, learning and focusing on wellness through the journey in landscape.

In DMP, wellness route design principle are preserving, exploring, learning and focusing on well-being.

24 \ PROJECTS Marina Wellness Core Equestrian Hotel Organic Farm Boulevard Linear Park Nabatean Coastal Route Mountain Right of Way
Marina Wellness Core Equestrian Hotel

3 scales of rest points are defined:

• Facilitated resting area: large rest points serve all users especially large group of visitors. Service scope of these rest points cover the whole linear park.

• Shared resting area: medium rest points can be shared between pedestrian, cyclist, horse and rider;

• Resting point: small rest points serve pedestrians, spacing 100m apart, evenly located in the primary and secondary shared path.

PROJECTS / 25 Illustrative Masterplan
Wadi Wadi Culinary Hotel Northern Mosque Culinary Hotel Family Resort Viewing Platform
Viewing Platform
Area Pedestrian
Viewing Platform Resting
and Bike Path Bridle Path
100m 200m 500m
Viewing Platform Crossing Crossing Viewing Platform Wadi Resting Point for: Group Pedestrian Cyclist Equestrian

3 well beloved park cases were selected to help understanding the most guest friendly resting points design principle.

• Integrate 3 mobility networks: pedestrian path, cycle path and bridle path

Culinary Hotel

Articulated Circulation System

Right of Way

• Considering climatic factors, create different using experience for different users. For pedestrian and cyclists, more direct routes are preferred, while bridle path could be more meander

• Creating garden rooms based on articulated circulation system, which could be combined with resting, viewing and other landscaping facilities

Landscape Spatial System

Wellness Route

Wellness Spa Hotel

26 \ PROJECTS
Adjacent Assets
Main Circulation System
3

Resting Points System

Diagram shows the distance and facility for each resting area type based on DMP’s requirement.

Large rest point: fully facilitated

Toilet

Food Kiosks

Emergency

Fixing

Charging

Water

Medium rest point: shared by pedestrian, cyclist, equestrian users

Small rest point: used by small groups of pedestrian and cyclist

PROJECTS / 27
500m 200m 100m
100m

Trendy Group Head Quarters

Year: 2019

Location: Guangzhou, China

Investor: Trendy International Group

Architectural Project: LDI

Landscape Project: DHL

Trendy Group Head Quarters is located at Guangzhou, China. The architectural program of two towers were: south tower as head quarter for company, north tower as fashion brands offices. Due to defined geometry of architectural plan, the landscape plan was organised in three sections. South part was initially planned as an sculpture garden, but then rearranged according to traffic regulations and fengshui demands. Middle part serves as a transition area between two towers, as well as a leisure zone for workers. North garden was designed as a high traffic area and request from the client as a scenery of “lush” garden.

Design of a roof garden was initially part of the landscape project, serving as a recreative area that serves both towers.

28 \ PROJECTS
Final Concept Design
PROJECTS / 29
Previous Concept Design Middle Entrance

SOUTH TERRACEFORMAL LOUNGE ZONE

NORTH TERRACERECREATION ZONE

30 \ PROJECTS
N

Combination Option 1

Combination Option 2

Combination Option 3

PROJECTS / 31
50cm Depth Planters 35cm Depth Planters 20cm Depth Planters Alocasia macrorrhizos ‘Giant Taro’ Sedum spurium ‘Coccineum’ Festuca arundinacea Hakonechloa macra Cyrtostachys renda Hosta varieties Strelitzia reginae Ophiopogon japonicus ‘Nanus’ Tradescantia pallida ‘Purpurea’

AND PASTEL

Year: 2017

Location: Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey

Investor: Anadolu Group

Architectural Design: HPP

Landscape Design: MSP

Landscape Project: TYLA

In the project designed by Martha Schwartz Partners (London), TYLA has worked as local landscape architect firm, preparing construction drawings and documents. Minor design revisions and changes have been carried through out the process.

32 \ PROJECTS
N
Plan (by Martha Schwartz Partners)
PROJECTS / 33 a a
Playground - Detail Plan Playground - Section A-A
34 \ PROJECTS
Courtyard Water Element - Section A-A Courtyard Water Element - Section B - B
A A B B
Courtyard Water Element - Detail Plan
PROJECTS / 35
Stainless Steel Canopy - Section A-A Stainless Steel Canopy - Joint Detail Stainless Steel Canopy - Detail Plan
a a

ANAMUR ATATEPE SOCIAL CENTER

Year: 2015

Location: Anamur, Mersin, Turkey

Investor: Anamur Municipality

Architectural Project: ATOLYE 1ARTIBIR

Landscape Project: TYLA

Anamur Atatepe Social Center is located at Anamur, Mersin. The unique geographical structure, existing plantation characteristics and the dominant location of the project over the county have been the key elements of the design. Regarding the altitude of the area and distinctive existing tree population of the area, implementing a comfortable and attractive promenade has been the primal approach to the project. After shaping the major walking route, minor paths and resting/observation decks have been positioned on various levels and perspectives. In order to enhance the usage and attraction of the area, various bespoke urban furnitures has been designed. The plantation strategy of the project has been to preserve the existing and enriching it with perennials and shrubs to create a dense plantation character.

36 \ PROJECTS Plan N A A

Plantation Characteristics

PROJECTS / 37
38 \ PROJECTS
PROJECTS / 39 Section A-A

JUMA VADI

Year: 2015

Location: Tarabya, Istanbul, Turkey

Investor: 6A Yapi Gayrimenkul

Architectural Project: Loft Mimarlik

Landscape Project: TYLA

Juma Vadi project site is located in Tarabya, Istanbul. The housing project is positioned at a high sloped area which has formed the main factor that shaped the design. Functioning between different levels, bespoke hardscape materials were used as unifying elements in both vertical and horizontal axes. While the plantation character has been chosen from monochrome characteristics, the idea of elevating them increased the three dimensional effect of the landscape. The forming retaining walls acted as canvas which carry a mobile plant pots.

40 \ PROJECTS c c B Plan N
PROJECTS / 41
Section C-C
Perspective View - B
42 \ PROJECTS
A B c d
Vertical Plantation - Detail Vertical Plantation - Section A
PROJECTS / 43
Vertical Plantation - Section B Vertical Plantation - Section C Vertical Plantation - Section D

PAMUKKALE CULTURE, ART AND SOCIAL CENTER

Year: 2015

Location: Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey

Investor: Pamukkale Municipality

Architectural Project: Demirten Mimarlik

Landscape Project: TYLA

Pamukkale Culture, Art and Social Center project is located at Pamukkale, Denizli. The project aims to make use of the level differences and use landscape as a medium to interlink the spaces. While the green is the dominant character of the ground level, upper level is followed by a water way which surrounds the area. Different zoning in the project has allowed the design to compromises varieties of approaches in terms of hardscape and softscape characteristics while remaining as a whole with the help of bespoke canopies and plantation choices.

44 \ PROJECTS Plan N C C B d D Perspective View - B
PROJECTS / 45
Elevation - C Section D - D
46 \ COMPETITIONS

THANK YOU

TUGYAN KEPKEP

Landscape Architect, MA

COMPETITIONS / 47

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.