Tugyan Kepkep - Portfolio

PORTFOLIO TUGYAN KEPKEP Landscape Architect, MA

CONTENT / CV .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 / WORKS // COMPETITIONS /// Salacak Urban Design Competition // Equivalent Mention (2020) ..........................................................................................................................6 /// Home2030 Competition (2020) .................................................................................................................................................................................................10 /// International Bandirma Park Competition // 4th Mention (2017) .............................................................................................................................12 /// Konyaalti Cost and Coastal Recreation Idea Project Competition // Equivalent Mention (2014) ..........................................................16 // PROJECTS /// Planning Application Projects (2021-2023) ..........................................................................................................................................................................18 /// Apple Project (2021) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................22 /// Amaala Triple Bay Public Realm (2021) ...............................................................................................................................................................................24 /// Trendy Group Head Quarters (2019) ......................................................................................................................................................................................28 /// AND Pastel (2017) ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................32 /// Anamur Atatepe Social Center (2015) ...................................................................................................................................................................................36 /// Juma Vadi Residential Project (2015) ....................................................................................................................................................................................40 // Pamukkale Culture, Art and Social Center (2015) .............................................................................................................................................................44

4 \ COVER LETTER

CV / 5

CV / PERSONAL DETAILS

WORK EXPERIENCE

OTHER WORKS

Name: Tugyan Kepkep

2021 - 2022 Erlam Studio

Date and Place of Birth: 12.10.1988, Istanbul

2021 - 2022 John Davies Landscape

2021 - 2023 Visiting Tutor in Landscape Architecture Studio Class, Istanbul Technical University (ITU)

E-mail: tugyan.kepkep@gmail.com

2020 - 2021 SKAB Landscape, Urban and Architecture Design, London

Telephone: +44 (0) 7380201201 Address: Ground Floor Flat, 47 Mayton Street, London, N7 6QP

EDUCATION 2014 - Present PhD, Landscape Architecture, Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Istanbul 2012 - 2013 MA, History and Critical Thinking, Architectural Association, London 2006 - 2011 B.Sc., Landscape Architecture, Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Istanbul 2008 - 2009 Erasmus Exchange Programme, Landscape Architecture, Ecole National Supérieure d’Architecture et de Paysage de Bordeaux, Bordeaux

SKILLS Language Turkish: Native Speaker English: Fluent French: Basic Software AutoCAD, Vectorworks, Adobe Suit (psd, ind, ai), SketchUp, Microsoft Office

2019 - 2020 Cameo & Partners, London 2018 - 2019 DHL, London 2014 - 2017 TYLA, Istanbul

2015 - 2016 / ITU Research Project: Spatial Representation of Time: Commemoration, Memorialisation and Memorial Spaces 2014 - 2016 / ITU PhD Studies: Wasted Lives and Spaces of City Google Earth and Shift in Visual Perspective

2010 - 2012 Editor, EkoYapi Magazine, Istanbul

2014 Sensible Cities: Interview with Carlo Ratti, EkoIQ Magazine, Issue 38

COMPETITIONS / AWARDS

2012 - 2013 / AA Master Thesis: To The Clouds And Back: The Journey of The Body

2020 Equivalent Mention Salacak Urban Design Competition

2012 - 2013 / AA MA Studies:

2020 Home2030 2017 19 May Path Urban Design Competition

Landownership in Jerusalem: Interview with Maximillian Jan Sternberg on architecture and social issues of Jerusalem

2017 4th Mention International Bandirma Park Competition

Old and New h city planning in modern architecture

2016 1st Mention Sucuzade Area Urban Design and Project Competition

Looking Through The Wall: Analysing the terms border and heterotopia in the works of Abramovic, Banksy and Dreyfus

2015 Equivalent Mention Gaziemir Aktepe and Emrez Neighborhoods Urban Regeneration Competition

2010 - 2012 / EkoYapi Magazine

2014 Equivalent Mention Konyaalti Coast and Coastal Recreation Idea Project Competition 2014 Equivalent Mention Çanakkale Social Housing Area Urban Regeneration National Architectural Competition

Negative Can Be Turned Into Positive: Interview w. Saskia Sassen (Issue 11) Mannahatta Project: Interview w. Dr. Eric Sanderson (Issue 10) Learning Architecture Through Practice: Rural Studio (Issue 5)

6 \ COMPETITIONS

SALACAK URBAN DESIGN COMPETITION Prize: Equivalent Mention Year: 2020 Location: Istanbul, Turkey Organizer: Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Team: Alican Çırakoglu, Ilgın Avcı, Tugyan Kepkep, Seyma Çakır, Batuhan Kumru, Aslıhan Sücüllü, Merve Özcan, Münür Özçelik The history of Salacak sea-cost has been shaped by the cultural richness of two ends of, Üsküdar and Kadıköy. Salacak has a significant place in urban memory as the location where Üsküdar meets with sea. However recent interventions has damaged its natural characteristics and this caused the loss of public’s connection with the sea and loss of spatial identity.

The proposal aims to recover what has been lost through simple and holistic interventions and reconstruct the memory of “The Sea”. Istanbul Bosporus has been approached as a unique scene in which the project enables to create different views at it. The sea-land relation has been continued all through out the project as a spine which in parts has sharp, other parts has a blending structure.

There are three main focus; Üsküdar square with Semsi Pasa Mosque built by Architect Sinan, old Bus Terminal, and Maiden’s Tower. They all have been evaluated as separate focus points, unified by the coastal line and vegetation characteristics. Üsküdar Square forms the historic, more traditional approach. Bus Terminal area presents a new urban open area for locals where social activities can be carried out. Maiden’s Tower location serves as the ideal location for social and touristic focus point. With proposed concrete canopy, it serves as the main view point.

Another important issue was transportation. The existing high-traffic road has been replaced with trams and bicycle roads, leaving only one lane for cars. Pedestrian lines have been enhanced and promoted through the spine.

The vegetation characteristic of the area has been preserved.

Proposed plants have been chosen from unique plants from Bosporus flora. In addition to this, the area’s inefficient water management problem has been solved with rain gardens stretching though out the transportation line.

COMPETITIONS / 7

8 \ COMPETITIONS

COMPETITIONS / 9

10 \ COMPETITIONS

HOME 2030 Year: 2020 Location: UK Organizer: HM Government Team: Ipek Kuzu, Irem Dökmeci, Tugyan Kepkep The goal of this proposal is to raise a holistic spatial approach which places social interaction at its core while both financially and environmentally benefiting actors of the built environment.

The architectural design undertakes the role of creating a social environment that allows people to connect with their community through sharing, producing and identity building, while operational components provide a blueprint for the construction sector.

The project carries out a cradle-to-cradle approach with all its operational and material components through a significant consideration into the whole building cycle, from business point of view to technical, constructional, management and finally deconstruction phases. The proposal aims to reach the net-zero-carbon goal and minimise environmental impact by combining multiple complementing strategies. In order to achieve these goals, these strategies not only take into consideration using modern technologies, but also a shift in operational and social aspects of design.

In design research, the main focus was on the social connection and how to develop a design narrative through it. In addition to expectations on social aspects of the competition brief, recent events have also shed a light on the fundamental importance of the sense of community and what it currently lacks. As the paradigm of daily life has shifted for good, current understanding of home is obliged to follow it. The confinement of a home is not sufficient, and this applies for every person. Daily life at home is expanding beyond this, creating a new network of places. This situation unveils the question of spatial privacy, especially in a society where individuality and ownership are considered as priority. In addition to this, a research1 shows that one of the biggest problems in the housing industry is the lack of acknowledgement for vulnerable people such as the elderly and people with disabilities, and their need for accessible spaces. Regarding these social concerns, embracing environmental goals and adopting a democratic approach in the sense of both material and spatial aspects constructed the fundamentals of our proposal. In this degree, the social demographic of the houses and communal areas of the project aims to be inclusive of all ages, categorised as 0-18, 18-60, +60; and lifestyles, categorised as single, couple, single parent, small and large family, cross generation and finally shared living.

COMPETITIONS / 11

12 \ COMPETITIONS

INTERNATIONAL BANDIRMA PARK COMPETITION Prize: 4th Mention Year: 2017 Location: Bandirma, Turkey Organizer: Bandirma Municipality Team: Tarık Yasar, Nurhak Inan Karacay, Ilker Ertugrul, Tugyan Kepkep, Bengi Altunay, Basa Enuysal, Ali Talha Koc The project’s primary aim is to create an attraction center not only for Bandırma’s local population but also for visitors and close by settlements. In order to support this, a macro-scaled strategy plan has been developed by studying eight main subjects; Utilization diversity, Transportation, Green space, Water, Climate, Morphology, Demography and Application model. Carrying out these topics from macro to micro scale, a new urban pattern has been designed by referencing the existing natural and man-made interventions on the area. The project proposes an infiltrating layout of structures within the gaps provided by the existing conditions.

Without any zoning, the project simply aims to settle where the area naturally leads to. This approach leads the architectural programme into a fragmented structure where the natural parameters such as making use of natural light and orienting towards the scenery defines the main characteristics. The institute building has been divided into two parts that are elevated from the ground level, allowing the preservation of the existing pattern. The cores of the blocks that connects the institute with the ground level are placed upon elevated platforms that can implement diverse programmes. The retail function has been divided into two parts, and following the existing building scale of Bandirma these parts are divided into smaller units. The four-starred hotel rooms are positioned on existing concrete blocks whereas the five-starred hotel’s form is associated with the existing concrete platforms.

Both hard and softscape designs of the landscape also references the existing conditions in design and material. The proposed plantation strategy takes into account the prevention of erosion, providing feed for existing animals and requiring no maintenance.

The choice of materials also follows the existing conditions. The natural stone that comes out from the local quarry and talus that is used as the main ingredient in mosaic pavements is proposed to be used.

COMPETITIONS / 13

14 \ COMPETITIONS

COMPETITIONS / 15

16 \ COMPETITIONS

KONYAALTI COAST AND COASTAL RECREATION IDEA PROJECT COMPETITION Prize: Equivalent Mention Year: 2014 Location: Konyaalti, Antalya, Turkey Organizer: Antalya Metropolitan Municipality Team: Tarık Yasar, Tugyan Kepkep, Gulce Kanturer, Caner Olcusenler, Alican Karalar The project aims to generate an urban strategy while preserving and restoring the macro planing decisions. The design makes use of the potentials of 7 km long waterfront through protecting existing natural elements and increase the urban utilization. The project proposes to remove the existing road that has a high density of traffic and detaches the city and the sea.

A new space design has been proposed in between the waterfront’s high and low levels to open access to daily social activities and related utilizations such as storage, security and relation.

COMPETITIONS / 17

18 \ PROJECTS

PLANNING APPLICATION PROJECTS Year: 2021-2023 Location: UK Landscape Project: John Davies Landscape Following three new residential development projects are samples from several which were focused exclusively on planning application. The work involved producing the complete landscape design package from design development to preparing all necessary documentations including Design Statement, Landscape Management Plan and Urban Greening Factor Report.

Eastcote Lane, Harrow, HA2 8RW

PROJECTS / 19

Eastcote Lane, Harrow, HA2 8RW

20 \ PROJECTS

URBAN GREENING FACTOR CALCULATION Surface Cover Type Semi-natural vegetation (e.g. trees, woodland, species-rich grassland) maintained or established on site.

Wetland or open water (semi-natural; not chlorinated) maintained or established on site.

Intensive green roof or vegetation over structure. Substrate minimum settled depth of 150mm.

Standard trees planted in connected tree pits with a minimum soil volume equivalent to at least two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree.

Extensive green roof with substrate of minimum settled depth of 80mm (or 60mm beneath vegetation blanket) – meets the requirements of GRO Code 2014.

Flower-rich perennial planting.

Rain gardens and other vegetated sustainable drainage elements.

Hedges (line of mature shrubs one or two shrubs wide).

Standard trees planted in pits with soil volumes less than two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree.

Green wall –modular system or climbers rooted in soil.

Groundcover planting.

Amenity grassland (species-poor, regularly mown lawn).

Extensive green roof of sedum mat or other lightweight systems that do not meet GRO Code 2014.

Water features (chlorinated) or unplanted detention basins.

Permeable paving.

Sealed surfaces (e.g. concrete, asphalt, waterproofing, stone).

Total Contribution Total Site Area (m2) Urban Greening Factor (Total contribution/Site Area)

Factor

Area (m²)

Contribution

1.00

0.00

0.00

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.80

0.00

0.00

0.80

18.20

14.56

0.70

55.80

39.06

0.70

57.30

40.11

0.70

0.00

0.00

0.60

10.60

6.36

0.60

7.00

4.20

0.60

137.80

82.68

0.50

0.00

0.00

0.40

60.60

24.24

0.30

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.00

0.00

0.10

180.90

18.09

0.00

0.00

0.00

Lynton Grange, London, N2 9EU

229.30 574 0.40

Materials

PROJECTS / 21

First Floor Plan

URBAN GREENING FACTOR CALCULATION

URBAN GREENING FACTOR CALCULATION Surface Cover Type Semi-natural vegetation (e.g. trees, woodland, species-rich grassland) maintained or established on site.

Wetland or open water (semi-natural; not chlorinated) maintained or established on site.

Intensive green roof or vegetation over structure. Substrate minimum settled depth of 150mm.

Standard trees planted in connected tree pits with a minimum soil volume equivalent to at least two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree.

Extensive green roof with substrate of minimum settled depth of 80mm (or 60mm beneath vegetation blanket) – meets the requirements of GRO Code 2014.

Flower-rich perennial planting.

Rain gardens and other vegetated sustainable drainage elements.

Hedges (line of mature shrubs one or two shrubs wide).

Standard trees planted in pits with soil volumes less than two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree.

Green wall –modular system or climbers rooted in soil.

Groundcover planting.

Amenity grassland (species-poor,

Factor

Area (m²)

Contribution

1.00

44.40

44.40

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.80

0.00

0.00

0.80

66.00

52.80

0.70

273.30

191.31

0.70

140.00

98.00

0.70

0.00

0.00

0.60

29.50

17.70

0.60

66.00

39.60

0.60

203.60

0.50

0.00

122.16 0.00

0.40

45.40

18.16

Surface Cover Type Semi-natural vegetation (e.g. trees, woodland, species-rich grassland) maintained or established on site.

Wetland or open water (semi-natural; not chlorinated) maintained or established on site.

Intensive green roof or vegetation over structure. Substrate minimum settled depth of 150mm.

Standard trees planted in connected tree pits with a minimum soil volume equivalent to at least two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree.

Extensive green roof with substrate of minimum settled depth of 80mm (or 60mm beneath vegetation blanket) – meets the requirements of GRO Code 2014.

Flower-rich perennial planting.

Rain gardens and other vegetated sustainable drainage elements.

Hedges (line of mature shrubs one or two shrubs wide).

Standard trees planted in pits with soil volumes less than two thirds of the projected canopy area of the mature tree.

Green wall –modular system or climbers rooted in soil.

Groundcover planting.

Amenity grassland (species-poor, regularly mown lawn).

Extensive green roof of sedum mat or other lightweight systems that do not meet GRO Code 2014.

Water features (chlorinated) or unplanted detention basins.

Permeable paving.

Sealed surfaces (e.g. concrete, asphalt, waterproofing, stone).

Total Contribution Total Site Area (m2) Urban Greening Factor (Total contribution/Site Area)

Factor

Area (m²)

Contribution

1.00

44.40

44.40

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.80

0.00

0.00

0.80

66.00

52.80

0.70

273.30

191.31

0.70

140.00

98.00

0.70

0.00

0.00

0.60

29.50

17.70

0.60

66.00

39.60

0.60

203.60

122.16

0.50

0.00

0.00

0.40

45.40

18.16

0.30

0.00

0.00

0.20

0.00

0.00

0.10

333.70

33.37

0.00

0.00

0.00

Third Floor Plan

Fourth Floor Plan

617.50 1475 0.42

Roof Plan

Hindes Road, Harrow, HA1 1SP

22 \ PROJECTS Upper Meadow: set of landforms and planting providing series of spaces for exploration Forest Garden: enclosed productive planting and composting Medicinal Courtyard: plants selected for medicinal properties

APPLE Project Year: 2021 - 2022 Location: Windelsham, England Architectural Project: Heatherwick Studio & Veretec Landscape Project: Erlam Studio Landscape design of Apple Project aims to evolve the existing qualities of the site and present an inviting and productive environment for the new users of the site. The vision for the concept landscape design involved developing a vision to transform and add value to the already mature and abundant 47 acre site by injecting new life and making it an inspiring location to work.

Building G

Building F

Building B Building D

Building A

Building H

Building C

The Prospect: sculpted landforms weaving together different adjacent spaces

Building E

Gardener’s building re-purposed as meeting / working space with outdoor terrace Manor Gardens: revitalised planting and layout respecting historic setting Potential new deliveries and storage facility

Pollinator Garden : landscape destination garden with focus on pollinator plants Potential new location for gardeners compound or new tennis courts connected to main lawn by woodland walk.

Arrival and welcome- enhanced way-finding

Pedestrian arrival footpaths journey though woodland to reveal of new building

Lush planting cascading down to lower level around new building

PROJECTS / 23

Vehicle and Pedestrian Movement Existing vehicle routes retained

Key

Adjusted vehicle route, material changed for pedestrian priority but allowing for vehicles and emergency access

New tree planting Planting around building H, including medicinal plants to the rear courtyard Woodland under-storey planting

Fire path with revised alignment

Shrub planting

Existing footpaths retained

Perennial planting

New pedestrian pathways

Swathes of meadow grass

Wider pedestrian circulation through the landscape

Feature planting within orchard Pollinator garden

Potential walking/cycling route around site perimeter

Productive forest garden

Woodland Arrival

Medicinal Courtyard

West Wood 0 Year

Existing Condition Brain Arrival

Upper Meadow

1 Year

2 Year

3 Years

De-Cluttering

Introducing Different Varieties

Biodiversity Rich Result

Lower Meadow 0 Year

Existing Condition

5 Years

Transformation into Wetland

Biodiversity Rich Result

24 \ PROJECTS

Amaala Triple Bay Public Realm Year: 2021 Location: Saudi Arabia Landscape Project: Martha Schwartz & SKAB Amaala Triple Bay is a coastal development project in Saudi Arabia designed by Martha Schwartz in collaboration with SKAB. The projects focuses on developing a masterplan for connecting marina, wellness core and Equestrian Hotel. In order to connect these three sites a Wellness Route strategy was developed which focuses on preserving, exploring, learning and focusing on wellness through the journey in landscape.

In DMP, wellness route design principle are preserving, exploring, learning and focusing on well-being.

Wellness Core

Marina

Marina

Organic Farm Boulevard

Linear Park

Wellness Core

Equestrian Hotel

Nabatean Coastal Route

Mountain Right of Way

Equestrian Hotel

PROJECTS / 25 Illustrative Masterplan Viewing Platform Northern Mosque

Viewing Platform

Pedestrian and Bike Path Wadi

Bridle Path Viewing Platform

Wadi

Crossing Culinary Hotel

Culinary Hotel

Family Resort Resting Area Viewing Platform Viewing Platform

Crossing

Wadi

3 scales of rest points are defined:

N

•

Facilitated resting area: large rest points serve all users especially large group of visitors. Service scope of these rest points cover the whole linear park.

•

Shared resting area: medium rest points can be shared between pedestrian,

Resting Point for: Equestrian Cyclist Pedestrian Group

cyclist, horse and rider; •

Resting point: small rest points serve pedestrians, spacing 100m apart, evenly located in the primary and secondary

100m

200m

500m

shared path.

26 \ PROJECTS

3 well beloved park cases were selected to help understanding the most guest friendly resting

Main Circulation System Culinary Hotel

Wellness Spa Hotel

points design principle.

•

Integrate 3 mobility networks: pedestrian path, cycle path and bridle path

Articulated Circulation System •

Right of Way

Considering climatic factors, create different

Wellness Route

using experience for different users. For pedestrian and cyclists, more direct routes are preferred, while bridle path could be more meander

Adjacent Assets

•

Creating garden rooms based on articulated circulation system, which could be combined with resting, viewing and other landscaping facilities

3 Landscape Spatial System

PROJECTS / 27

Resting Points System

Large rest point: fully facilitated

Diagram shows the

500m

distance and facility for each resting area type based on DMP’s requirement.

Medium rest point: shared by pedestrian, cyclist, equestrian users

Toilet Food Kiosks Emergency Fixing Charging Water

200m

Small rest point: used by small groups of pedestrian and cyclist 100m

100m

28 \ PROJECTS

Trendy Group Head Quarters Year: 2019 Location: Guangzhou, China Investor: Trendy International Group Architectural Project: LDI Landscape Project: DHL Trendy Group Head Quarters is located at Guangzhou, China. The architectural program of two towers were: south tower as head quarter for company, north tower as fashion brands offices. Due to defined geometry of architectural plan, the landscape plan was organised in three sections. South part was initially planned as an sculpture garden, but then rearranged according to traffic regulations and fengshui demands. Middle part serves as a transition area between two towers, as well as a leisure zone for workers.

North garden was designed as a high traffic area and request from the client as a scenery of “lush” garden.

Design of a roof garden was initially part of the landscape project, serving as a recreative area that serves both towers.

Final Concept Design

PROJECTS / 29

Middle Entrance

Previous Concept Design

30 \ PROJECTS

NORTH TERRACE RECREATION ZONE

SOUTH TERRACE FORMAL LOUNGE ZONE

N

PROJECTS / 31

50cm Depth Planters

35cm Depth Planters

Combination Option 1

Combination Option 2

Combination Option 3

Alocasia macrorrhizos ‘Giant Taro’

Cyrtostachys renda

Strelitzia reginae

Tradescantia pallida ‘Purpurea’

Hakonechloa macra

Hosta varieties

20cm Depth Planters

Ophiopogon japonicus ‘Nanus’ Sedum spurium ‘Coccineum’

Festuca arundinacea

32 \ PROJECTS

AND PASTEL Year: 2017 Location: Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey Investor: Anadolu Group Architectural Design: HPP Landscape Design: MSP Landscape Project: TYLA In the project designed by Martha Schwartz Partners (London), TYLA has worked as local landscape architect firm, preparing construction drawings and documents. Minor design revisions and changes have been carried through out the process.

N Plan (by Martha Schwartz Partners)

PROJECTS / 33

a

a

Playground - Detail Plan

Playground - Section A-A

34 \ PROJECTS

A

A

B

B

Courtyard Water Element - Detail Plan

Courtyard Water Element - Section A-A

Courtyard Water Element - Section B - B

PROJECTS / 35

Stainless Steel Canopy - Section A-A

a

a

Stainless Steel Canopy - Detail Plan

Stainless Steel Canopy - Joint Detail

36 \ PROJECTS

ANAMUR ATATEPE SOCIAL CENTER Year: 2015 Location: Anamur, Mersin, Turkey Investor: Anamur Municipality Architectural Project: ATOLYE 1ARTIBIR Landscape Project: TYLA Anamur Atatepe Social Center is located at Anamur, Mersin. The unique geographical structure, existing plantation characteristics and the dominant location of the project over the county have been the key elements of the design. Regarding the altitude of the area and distinctive existing tree population of the area, implementing a comfortable and attractive promenade has been the primal approach to the project. After shaping the major walking route, minor paths and resting/observation decks have been positioned on various levels and perspectives. In order to enhance the usage and attraction of the area, various bespoke urban furnitures has been designed. The plantation strategy of the project has been to preserve the existing and enriching it with perennials and shrubs to create a dense plantation character.

A

A

N Plan

PROJECTS / 37

Plantation Characteristics

38 \ PROJECTS

PROJECTS / 39

Section A-A

40 \ PROJECTS

JUMA VADI Year: 2015 Location: Tarabya, Istanbul, Turkey Investor: 6A Yapi Gayrimenkul Architectural Project: Loft Mimarlik Landscape Project: TYLA Juma Vadi project site is located in Tarabya, Istanbul. The housing project is positioned at a high sloped area which has formed the main factor that shaped the design. Functioning between different levels, bespoke hardscape materials were used as unifying elements in both vertical and horizontal axes. While the plantation character has been chosen from monochrome characteristics, the idea of elevating them increased the three dimensional effect of the landscape. The forming retaining walls acted as canvas which carry a mobile plant pots. c

B

c

N Plan

PROJECTS / 41

Perspective View - B

Section C-C

42 \ PROJECTS

A

B

c

d

Vertical Plantation - Detail

Vertical Plantation - Section A

PROJECTS / 43

Vertical Plantation - Section B

Vertical Plantation - Section C

Vertical Plantation - Section D

44 \ PROJECTS

PAMUKKALE CULTURE, ART AND SOCIAL CENTER Year: 2015 Location: Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey Investor: Pamukkale Municipality Architectural Project: Demirten Mimarlik Landscape Project: TYLA

C

C

d

Pamukkale Culture, Art and Social Center project is located at Pamukkale, Denizli. The project aims to make use of the level differences and use landscape as a medium to interlink the spaces.

While the green is the dominant character of the ground level, upper level is followed by a water way which surrounds the area.

Different zoning in the project has allowed the design to compromises varieties of approaches in terms of hardscape and softscape characteristics while remaining as a whole with the help of bespoke canopies and plantation choices.

B

D N Plan

Perspective View - B

PROJECTS / 45

Elevation - C

Section D - D

46 \ COMPETITIONS

COMPETITIONS / 47

THANK YOU TUGYAN KEPKEP Landscape Architect, MA