The Rice Thresher | Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Page 1

VOLUME 100, ISSUE NO. 5 | STUDENT-RUN SINCE 1916 | RICETHRESHER.ORG | WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 2015

Addressing Unwanted Sexual Experiences

SEXUAL MISCONDUCT SURVEY AT RICE UNIVERSITY

RothGo to the museum! See Mark Rothko’s work at the Museum of Fine Arts

72.3% of ALL RICE UNDERGRADS & GRADS RESPONDED TO THE SURVEY 26.8% did not wish to participate in the survey 0.2% did not open survey; 0.7% gave consent but inserted no data

see A&E p. 6 RetrOspectiveWeek, Part 2 McMurtry O-Week coords respond to last week’s ops

see Ops p. 5 MOB’s Clipped Wings Big 12 prevents band’s travel to game vs. No. 5 Baylor

see Sports p. 9

Professors reflect on distribution classes

Anita Alem News Editor

According to Rice’s Survey on Unwanted Sexual Experiences, 18.9 percent of female and 4.9 percent of male graduate and undergraduate students have experienced unwanted sexual contact in their time at Rice. On the survey, conducted in spring 2015, students selected one or more of six nonconsensual behaviors depending on their personal experiences. Provost Marie Lynn Miranda said the survey is a step toward understanding the dimensions to this issue on Rice’s campus.

“These numbers confirm our belief that we have more work to do,� Miranda said. “The objective here was not just to get more information, [but also] to inform better programs that we need to put into place to make sure that all of our students are safe, protected, happy and prospering on this campus.� The Results Students could open the survey and choose whether to participate: A total of 72.3 percent of students chose to participate, while 26.8 percent refused. The remaining students either did not open the survey or gave consent but did not enter any data.

7.4% 24.2% UNDERGRADS UNDERGRADS

Andrew Ligeralde Assistant News Editor

Any Rice undergraduate who has sought academic advice from other students will more likely than not have heard the words “easy distribution credit.â€? It should come as no surprise that positively skewed grade distributions, light work loads and generous course reviews are tantalizing features to students looking to knock out graduation requirements. From the student’s point of view, it is entirely clear why taking a low effort “blow o â€? instead of a more demanding course is a desirable, even strategic option. But for the professors teaching distribution courses, the process is anything but low eort. Peer over the sea of heads in Herring Hall’s auditorium during one of Jeery Kripal’s lectures, and you will be hard-pressed to find a student with an open laptop or cellphone. “I decided to ban technology from the classroom,â€? Kripal, who teaches Introduction to the Study of Religion (RELI 101), said. “I’ve seen students on Facebook or YouTube or shopping for whatever.â€? Kripal prohibited laptops and cellphones four years ago to combat what he calls student apathy. “I am very aware that the majority of students in [my] class really don’t care,â€? Kripal said. “It’s very dispiriting.â€? At a current enrollment of 196 students, RELI 101 is one of the university’s most popular undergraduate courses. Oered every fall, the course features a lecture format in which the final grade is based on 10 reading quizzes and two multiple choice examinations. Last year, more than 80 percent of students who took the course finished with an A. Upon successful completion of RELI 101, students receive three hours of humanities (D1) distribution credit. “The requirements are not onerous,â€? Kripal said. “There’s no paper ‌ So they take it as a class that they think will be easy.â€? 0see CREDITS, page 3

2.0%

7.4%

The data was directly sent to the National Opinion Research Council, an independent institution at the University of Chicago. NORC has yet to provide qualitative results from sections in which students provided more information on their experiences. “It was important to us to use a third-party data analyst so there was someone external and purely objective looking at our data,� Miranda said. In fall 2014, the federal government recommended that universities complete climate surveys before the end of 2015 as part of a report regarding sexual assault on college campuses. However,

according to Dean of Undergraduates John Hutchinson, Rice took this step of its own accord. Of those providing responses, 35.9 percent overall indicated they had no experience with unwanted sexual experiences. Among responding undergraduates, 24.2 percent of females and 7.4 percent of males had unwanted sexual experiences at Rice. Among responding graduate students, these numbers were 7.2 percent of females and 2.0 percent respectively. Out of the total student population, 5.0 percent of females and 1.1 percent of males experienced penetrative sexual assault. 0see SURVEY, page 2

ON AT LEAST ONE OCCASION, SOMEONE ... kissed me touched, fondled or rubbed against my private areas removed some of my clothes put a penis or inserted fingers/objects into my vagina/anus performed oral sex on me or made me give them oral sex put my penis/fingers or objects in their vagina/anus

GRADS GRADS reported unwanted sexual contact

... WITHOUT MY CONSENT�

% of undergrads who have experienced completed acts of the following sexual misconduct:

21.0% 6.2%

touching, fondling or rubbing against private areas

3.0% 0.8%

forced oral sex

5.6% 0.3%

anal/vaginal penetration design by justin park

Student behavior can help reduce servery food waste, says Housing and Dining Hannah Che

Thresher Staff

The six serveries at Rice are among the most frequented places on campus, yet most students are unaware of what takes place behind the scenes in order to produce and serve roughly 1.3 million meals per school year. One factor that plays a significant role in all the serveries’ decisions is sustainability, according to Housing and Dining Senior Business Director David McDonald. McDonald said a key part of being sustainable is finding ways to reduce food waste. According to McDonald, food waste can be broken into two categories: pre-consumer and post-

consumer. The former involves the production of food in the kitchen before it goes to the line. “There are a couple ways to reduce pre-consumer food waste, the easiest of which is to buy food that’s already pre-made, which we don’t do, since 90 percent of our food is made from scratch,� McDonald said. “The other way is to have excellent chefs.� McDonald explained that the serveries are run by 15 American Culinary Federation certified chefs, who are equipped with the knowledge and experience to prepare raw ingredients with minimal waste. “This level of expertise in the kitchen is one of the main reasons, if not the best reason, that we have very little pre-consumer waste in

the kitchen,� McDonald said. Richard Johnson, director of the Rice Administrative Center for Sustainability and Energy Management, said employing high-quality chefs is essential. “This is not your traditional school cafeteria ‘reheat’ staff who are making minimum wage,� Johnson said. “These are knowledgeable workers. They know how to cut pineapple to minimize waste, how to utilize whole plants for multiple dishes and how to transform trimmings into fruit slushies and soup stock. Our chefs literally try to find a use for everything, and that’s the culture that is emphasized here.� Another method of reducing preconsumer food waste is found in the 0see SERVERIES, page 4

In the United States, 30-40% of food is wasted, according to the USDA. H&D measures to reduce food waste: ĂŁ +LULQJ ZHOO WUDLQHG FHUWLÄ? HG FKHIV ĂŁ &RRNLQJ LQ EDWFKHV DQG VDYLQJ LQJUHGLHQWV ĂŁ &RQVROLGDWLQJ VHUYLQJ OLQHV ĂŁ 8VLQJ FRPELQDWLRQ RYHQV DQG EODVW IUHH]HUV ĂŁ 3RUWLRQ FRQWURO VPDOOHU SRUWLRQ VL]HV ĂŁ (OLPLQDWLQJ PHDO WUD\V


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.