business@tribunemedia.net
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2019
$4.50
$4.53
Wells LOI battle: ‘It’s finished now’
By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
A $727.364M DAMAGES claim against Renward Wells and others was yesterday branded as “finished” after the firm at the centre of the Letter of Intent (LOI) controversy withdrew its appeal. Gregory Moss, the nowCabinet minister’s attorney, told Tribune Business there was little prospect that Stellar Energy would be able to revive its action against his client and the co-defendants, Algernon Allen and Frank Forbes, who the company alleged had acted as government “agents” in its bid to develop a wasteto-energy plant at the New
further grounds of appeal.” Mr Moss said Stellar Energy’s attorneys had indicated they would look to re-file an appeal, but he argued it was difficult to see how there could be any “substance” to such a move. Tribune Business was unable to contact Stellar Energy’s attorneys, Osman and Rengin Johnson, and their firm, Ayse Rengin Dengizer Johnson, for comment prior to press time last night. However, legal documents obtained by Tribune
By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net RENWARD WELLS
Business show Mr Wells and his attorney arguing that the case be dismissed on technical grounds because Stellar Energy had failed to follow the correct legal procedures for getting permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The appeal’s meek withdrawal is a marked change from the bullish April 2019 statement issued by Stellar Energy’s attorneys, in which they pledged to appeal on
SEE PAGE 4
‘Music to my ears’ WTO 95% unlikely By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net SUPER Value’s principal yesterday said it was “music to my ears” to hear the government’s WTO chief negotiator state The Bahamas is almost certainly not joining under this administration. Rupert Roberts, who has vehemently opposed becoming a full World Trade Organisation (WTO) member, told Tribune Business it “comes as a welcome relief” after Zhivargo Laing told an Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) organised seminar that The Bahamas was “95 percent unlikely” to join under the Minnis administration. He added that whether The Bahamas signs on to the global rules-based trading
• SuperValue boss: ‘Welcome relief’ to hear • Fears ‘loss of Bahamian identity, sovereignty’ • Anti-WTO activist: ‘Dorian’s put this to rest’
RUPERT ROBERTS regime’s overseer should “be an election issue”, giving the electorate the ultimate say on whether this nation embraces or rejects the WTO. Mr Roberts, though, voiced doubts that any
Govt targets ‘best in class’ over aviation By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
THE government’s aircraft registry ambitions are critical to developing a “best in class aviation sector”, a Cabinet minister telling Tribune Business yesterday: “Now the journey begins.” Dionisio D’Aguilar, minister of tourism and aviation, told Tribune Business he was aiming to implement the necessary legislative and regulatory changes to facilitate the registry’s creation within the next 12 to 18 months. He disclosed that the
DIONISIO D’AGUILAR government is also seeking to conclude a final agreement with Aviation Registry Group (ARG), the company responsible for developing aircraft registries in Aruba and San
SEE PAGE 5
Ex-Atlantis staffer loses appeal over $300,000 fraud By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net A FORMER Atlantis employee who masterminded a $300,000 fraud against the Paradise Island resort has seen her wrongful dismissal counterclaim dismissed by the Court of Appeal. It also upheld the hotel’s “breach of fiduciary duty” against Monteigne Cunningham, a former administrative assistant in its security administration office, finding that she was in a position of trust that required her to act
honestly as the last person to send cheque payment requests to the Atlantis accounts department. The Court of Appeal, in a unanimous verdict, detailed how Ms Cunningham was responsible for approving and authorising payment to third party investigators who carried out due diligence and background checks on prospective Atlantis employees. She also had to prepare and submit cheques for these vendors to Atlantis’ accounts department for final signature and payment, and the verdict detailed how she was
SEE PAGE 5
political party would win if it included full WTO membership in its campaign platform, arguing that “it would be defeated” in either a general election or referendum on the matter. Reiterating his opposition to joining, the Super Value chief argued that fully opening up this country’s economy to foreign competition would result in a “loss of Bahamian identity and sovereignty” as the world rushed in. “That’s music to my ears,” Mr Roberts told Tribune Business of Mr Laing’s pessimistic prediction. “I think that the government will
$4.54
Appeal justice raises ‘judicial activism’ fear
• Stellar withdraws $727m claim appeal • Minister’s attorney: Should be ‘end of the matter’ • ‘Can’t see any further grounds for appeal’
Providence landfill. Mr Moss, also a former PLP MP, said Stellar Energy’s attorneys filed the “notice of withdrawal of appeal” this Tuesday just prior to the case’s scheduled hearing that same day. He said the move came after they realised Mr Wells and his co-defendants had a strong case for why the dispute should be dismissed. “I regard that as being effectively the end of the matter,” he told Tribune Business. “I don’t see how there could possibly be any
$4.54
make the right decision if it has chosen not to pursue it [WTO accession] in these terms. “Let it come up as an election issue and see where it stands with the people. I think if we had a referendum on it, it would be defeated. I don’t think the government could win on joining the WTO. They wouldn’t win an election on it, and they wouldn’t win a referendum on it. Nobody seems to be for it.’ Mr Roberts was reacting after Mr Laing, in a presentation to the IDB’s forum
SEE PAGE 4
A COURT of Appeal judge has seemingly cautioned a colleague for straying into “judicial activism” in a case involving the termination of a 14-year veteran John Bull store manager. Appeal justice Stella Crane-Scott said “courts should avoid” straying into making law, as opposed to interpreting the law, as she expressed concerns over how fellow justice, Sir Michael Barnett, had arrived at the same conclusion as herself and appeal justice Jon Isaacs in finding that Helena McCardy was unfairly dismissed by the luxury goods retailer. Emphasising that “any perceived inadequacies or shortcomings” in the Employment Act had to be addressed by Parliament as the law-making body, appeal justice Scott-Crane wrote that Sir Michael, a former chief justice, had “imported” tests and rulings from UK law that were not applicable to Bahamian law. She argued that this approach would ultimately result in the “conflating” of claims for wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal, which have traditionally been separate under Bahamian law even though the Industrial Tribunal and judicial system have dealt with both in the same case. “In my view, given the limitations of our [Employment] Act as presently drafted and the existing local jurisprudence, wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal claims are completely separate claims, each with their own principles which cannot be conflated in the manner proposed in the absence of statutory intervention,” Appeal justice Scott-Crane wrote. “As I see it, unless and until Parliament sees fit to
amend the Employment Act to import or adopt the criteria set out in section 98 of the UK Act, any reliance on UK Employment Tribunal cases must be viewed with extreme care.” While Ms McCardy’s case was based on unfair dismissal, appeal justice Scott-Crane said Sir Michael’s ruling started from the premise that there was nothing in the Employment Act to prevent the Industrial Tribunal from treating it as matter where she was improperly dismissed for gross misconduct. The former chief justice said there were no legal limits on an “unfair dismissal” claim, and the ways in which employees can be treated as such, as it was not defined in the Employment Act. Bahamian law, as it currently stands, only says that “unfair dismissal” be determined on “the substantial merits of the case”. Sir Michael, though, used section 98 of the UK’s Employment Rights Act, which defines the criteria for what is “wrongful dismissal”, to find that this includes cases involving alleged misconduct where the employer was purported not to have acted reasonably in terminating a worker. Appeal justice CraneScott, noting that he had “imported” UK law and judicial tests to help him reach a verdict, wrote: “With respect, this approach may fairly be characterised as judicial activism which courts should avoid. “Any perceived inadequacies or shortcomings of the current Employment Act vis-à-vis its English counterpart should be addressed by Parliament, not by the courts. To do otherwise is essentially to incorporate into the clear words of our Employment Act, criteria and concepts
SEE PAGE 6