






The San Juan Daily Star, the only paper with
News Service in English in Puerto Rico, publishes 7 days a week, with a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday edition, along with a Weekend Edition to cover Friday, Saturday and Sunday.
By THE STAR STAFF
The Department of Transportation and Public Works (DTOP by its acronym in Spanish) supported a measure Thursday, during a public hearing in the House of Representatives, proposing a 35% discount on traffic fines. The initiative aims to encourage the expedited payment of penalties related to AutoExpreso tolls, expired placards and administrative infractions.
Rep. José “Cheito” Hernández Concepción, who chairs the House Transportation Committee, initiated the evaluation process for House Bill 602. The bill also proposes a 100% discount on accrued interest and surcharges on fines. Additionally, drivers who enter into a payment plan will receive a 50% discount on those interest payments and surcharges.
Hernández Concepción emphasized the importance of approaching the amnesty initiatives thoughtfully to ensure
their completion. He announced that further public hearings will be held once the report from the Legislative Assembly Budget Office is received, but said he wanted to kick off the process now with the goal of approving it this year.
DTOP Associate Secretary Marcos García noted that no new fines related to the AutoExpreso system have been issued since April 2022, meaning only fines issued before that date will qualify for the proposed discounts. He recommended that the legislation clearly state that any AutoExpreso-related discounts apply to tickets and that the toll charges owed must be paid in full.
“Any citizen who opts for a payment plan for AutoExpreso fines must pay the total amount of tolls owed at the time of requesting the payment plan, while the fines can be paid according to the existing provisions,” García said. “This is crucial, as the Highway and Transportation Authority has obligations to the various concessionaires managing the toll roads.”
Hernández Concepción noted that the last similar incentive approved by the Legislative Assembly was in 2016. That amnesty lasted 180 days, benefiting 152,000 individuals and generating $44.5 million in revenue for the island treasury.
Data presented by the DTOP during the hearing indicated that, as of February 2022, there were some 129,000 unpaid fines, predominantly related to expired stickers. Those violations currently amount to $53 million and are included in the agency’s budget for the upcoming fiscal year as accounts receivable.
Typically, the agency generates between $80 and $90 million in annual revenue from electronic ticket payments. García also clarified that traffic fines issued by municipalities and the revenue from those tickets do not belong to the DTOP, and therefore the bill should include such a clarification in its language.
By THE STAR STAFF
atural and Environmental Resources (DNER)
Secretary Waldemar Quiles Pérez reported on Thursday an incident that occurred last Sunday in which a citizen fatally attacked a caiman on Highway PR-686, kilometer 4.1, in the Laguna neighborhood of Manatí.
“While I was driving to a family activity, I observed a citizen brutally attacking a caiman in front of a woman and a child,” Quiles said in a written statement. “I stopped immediately and reported the situation to the Commissioner of the [DNER] Ranger Corps.”
The citizen, accompanied by the woman and the child, fled the scene in a minivan after the DNER chief witnessed the incident. Quiles said he provided the vehicle information, including the license plate number, to initiate the corresponding investigation.
The caiman, some three and a half feet long, died the same day as a result of the attack, a veterinarian confirmed. Quiles thanked the Ranger Corps and the Manatí Municipal Police for their work, reiterating his commitment to appear as a witness in court proceedings.
The investigation is being led by Officer Héctor Maisonet of the Manatí Municipal Police. The case was filed under complaint number 2025-2-047-002871.
By THE STAR STAFF
The Federation of Long-Term Care Institutions (FICPRO by its acronym in Spanish) is deeply alarmed by the substantial payment arrears from the island Family Department, which it says are critically undermining the operations of facilities dedicated to the care of older adults.
FICPRO President Jonathan Morales Adorno has revealed that many centers are burdened with debts of up to two years, exceeding $2 million. Some facilities are claiming debts of $40,000, $70,000, and even $90,000. Others have contended with late payments since 2020, illustrating a severe and ongoing crisis.
“The cycle repeats itself,” Adorno said in a statement issued Thursday. “In 2023 alone, the Department of Family Affairs owed approximately $4 million to long-term care facilities housing seniors.”
Adorno stressed that the delay has led to serious financial instability for many of the 587 FICPRO-affiliated institutions, which are struggling to meet their obligations and ensure the high-quality, continuous care that island seniors deserve.
The amounts owed are indispensable, he said, for sustaining operations and fulfilling contractual commitments related to food services, 24-hour care, professional staff payroll, and essential utilities, including water, electricity, telephone and gas.
Adorno demanded that the government fulfill its financial duties. “Given the urgent crisis affecting abandoned seniors, it is only fair that providers receive prompt payment for the essential services rendered,” he said. “Children who abandon their parents are just as irresponsible as the government when it delays payments for our essential care, love, food, protection, and safe housing for thousands of seniors.”
Before the hurricane season, long-term care facilities must strictly comply with Law 88 of April 14, 2018 (Service Provision Guarantee Law), which mandates that facilities have a reliable power source capable of continuous operation during power outages and maintain sufficient fuel supplies for at least
20 days post-disaster. Additionally, they must stock essential medications and basic necessities for this duration, and have a water cistern with adequate capacity for at least five days.
Adorno emphasized that institutions do not receive assured monthly payment dates from the Family Department, severely impeding their ability to manage finances effectively based on their budget and projected income.
“The inefficiency of this payment process by the Department of Family Affairs jeopardizes the functioning of our institutions and, even more critically, the quality of life of our seniors,” he said.
Adorno, on behalf of the organization he leads, called
for the immediate settlement of outstanding debts and the establishment of clear protocols to ensure effective monthly payments within the first five days of the succeeding month. FICPRO also called on all stakeholders to take decisive action to resolve this critical situation.
According to Family Department data, the agency subsidizes the care of more than 5,807 seniors placed in various centers across the island, all of whom risk losing essential assisted care services if the issue remains unaddressed, Adorno said.
Separately, in response to growing concerns about the safety and well-being of seniors housed in senior living facilities in San Juan’s House District 2, Rep. Ricardo “Chino” Rey Ocasio Ramos announced Thursday the introduction of a resolution ordering a thorough investigation into the conditions at the residential centers in question.
The initiative, filed by Representative Ocasio Ramos, seeks to ensure that the facilities have adequate emergency plans, sufficient resources, and the necessary infrastructure to respond effectively to natural disasters, especially during hurricane season.
“The well-being and safety of our seniors must be a top priority,,” the lawmaker said. “Recent experience during weather events has shown us that there is still much room for improvement in the nursing homes of District 2, where more than 1,000 people reside who deserve protection and dignified care.”
“We must act responsibly and urgently to ensure these centers are better prepared for any emergency,” he added. “We cannot allow a lack of resources or planning to put the lives of vulnerable people at risk.
The resolution directs the House Committee on Senior Citizens and Social Welfare to carry out a series of actions, including visits, interviews and requests for information from the nursing home administrations. The main objective is to evaluate their emergency plans, the operation of their facilities, the availability of backup equipment such as power plants and cisterns, and their response capacity in a crisis situation.
By THE STAR STAFF
The Institute of Forensic Sciences (ICF) will begin the implementation phase of its DNA laboratory automation project in June, which will triple its evidence sample processing capacity, ICF Executive Director María Conte Miller announced Thursday.
“Automating laboratory work allows DNA analysts to triple the number of samples processed compared to conventional manual methods,” Conte Miller said in a written statement.
The QIAcube Connect device will reduce sample processing time from 18-24 hours to 2.5 hours. Additionally, the QIAgil-
ity device can process up to 96 samples in a single cycle, shortening preparation time from 3 hours to just 45 minutes.
The new tools will be used in cases of sexual assault, homicide, robbery, and for DNA database samples (CODIS), according to Mireya Hernández Arroyo, the ICF’s forensic DNA supervisor.
Conte Miller said the project will standardize processes, reduce reagent usage, and ensure service continuity, resulting in a more agile and efficient operation.
Currently, the laboratory has 14 DNA analysts, six technicians, and three managers in charge of sample management. Equipment validation and staff training are already underway as part of the implementation.
By THE STAR STAFF
The Puerto Rico Chamber of Commerce (CCPR by its initials in Spanish) has announced its support for the federal Medical Manufacturing Economic Development and Sustainability Act (MMEDS Act), a bipartisan measure introduced in the U.S. Congress by Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) along with Reps. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.), Jeff Hurd (R-Colo.), and Darren Soto (D-Fla.).
The legislation, originally co-authored by Rep. María Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.), seeks to incentivize the return of pharmaceutical manufacturing to the United States, focusing on economically distressed areas such as Puerto Rico. Through dollar-for-dollar tax credits and other federal incentives, the measure promotes investment in infrastructure, human capital and local procurement by manufacturers of essential medical products.
“The MMEDS Act represents a historic opportunity to revitalize Puerto Rico’s manufacturing base and position the island as a leader in global pharmaceutical production,” CCPR President Luis E. Pizarro Otero said. “We join industry and allies in Congress in supporting this key initiative for our economy and national security.”
Puerto Rico, with its proven capacity in medical manufacturing operations, is emerging as an ideal jurisdiction for the benefits envisioned in the MMEDS Act. The proposed legislation would provide significant incentives to U.S. companies that operate or relocate their operations to areas with high levels of poverty, unemployment, and low labor force participation. The CCPR reaffirmed its commitment to collaborating with the private sector and legislative leaders in Washington to advance policies that enhance Puerto Rico’s competitiveness and promote sustainable economic development.
“The COVID-19 pandemic made it clear that we cannot rely on foreign suppliers for essential pharmaceutical and medical products,” said CCPR First Vice President José Julio Aparicio, who leads the chamber’s Federal Affairs Committee. “The MMEDS Act demonstrates that the federal Congress is taking proactive steps to protect the health of our citizens, strengthen the national supply chain, and encourage investment and economic development nationwide.”
Gov. Jenniffer González Colón emphasized the MMEDS Act “is an essential tool for consolidating Puerto Rico as a strategic manufacturing hub for the United States.”
“This legislation aligns perfectly with our efforts to attract investment, create jobs, and ensure that our island plays a key role in national supply chain security,” she said. “As the nation seeks to strengthen and repatriate its manufacturing capacity, Puerto Rico emerges as an ideal solution, thanks to its advanced infrastructure, technical capacity, and highly skilled workforce.”
“I deeply thank Congress members Malliotakis, Torres, Hurd, and Soto for leading this bipartisan initiative, which not only advances Puerto Rico but also guides the nation toward a more secure and competitive future,” the governor added. “I also recognize and value the support of the Puerto Rico Chamber of Commerce, whose collaboration is essential to aligning the private sector with the economic development goals promoted by this measure.”
In a recent meeting with the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration (PRFAA) team in Mexico City, the CCPR president signed a letter endorsing the congressional bill to send to Malliotakis, expressing support for the measure. PRFAA Executive Director Gabriella Boffelli stated that “we have worked closely with allies in Congress to promote
legislation that recognizes Puerto Rico’s true potential as a center of excellence in advanced manufacturing.”
“The MMEDS Act, initially filed by the governor during her term in Congress and now led by Representative Malliotakis, represents a firm and decisive step toward that shared vision,” Boffelli said. “This proposal not only fosters sustainable economic development but also validates the talent and training of our workforce. I thank the Puerto Rico Chamber of Commerce for its institutional support and for reaffirming the business sector’s commitment to this common mission. Puerto Rico has the capacity and the will to respond to the nation’s needs. With initiatives like this, we open new opportunities for our island to play a leading role in the economic and industrial future of the United States.”
By THE STAR STAFF
Sen. Gabriel “Gaby” González López announced on Thursday a proposal to amend Act No. 54 of 1989, with the goal of strengthening the island government’s commitment to justice and the protection of victims of sexual crimes. The initiative seeks to eliminate the possibility of individuals convicted of sexual assault from benefiting from judicial diversion programs, a measure the legislator considers essential to guarantee the safety and dignity of victims.
“Every victim of sexual assault deserves justice, not re-victimization,” González said. “Allowing those who commit these crimes to evade a rigorous judicial process and access diversion programs is an affront to victims’ rights and sends the wrong signal to those who would commit these heinous acts. Our legislation must be clear and firm in protecting those who have suffered so much.”
“Sexual violence leaves deep and permanent scars on
the lives of its victims,” the senator added. “My commitment is to those who have been violated and to the responsibility of our justice system to be unforgiving toward those who violate their integrity. This change in the law sends a strong message: in Puerto Rico, justice and the protection of human rights are priorities.”
The reality of sexual violence in Puerto Rico represents a persistent and alarming problem, González noted. Between January 2021 and December 2023, more than 2,300 cases were documented, mostly involving women and young people, many of whom are in vulnerable situations.
“The seriousness of the crimes requires that our legislation be clear and strict in its response, excluding any possibility of diverting benefits that could put the community at risk,” the Arecibo District senator said. “Our commitment is to the victims, their families, and the integrity of our justice system.
“This amendment represents a courageous and necessary step for Puerto Rico to send a strong signal against impunity for sexual crimes and ensure uncompromising justice.”
By CATIE EDMONDSON
Conservative Republicans in the House were in open revolt Thursday over their party’s major legislation to deliver President Donald Trump’s domestic agenda, threatening to derail the tax and budget measure over concerns that it would add too much to the deficit.
In a sign of the dissent in the party’s ranks, Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, an influential anti-spending conservative, left a meeting in Speaker Mike Johnson’s office in the Capitol meant to assuage holdout lawmakers and declared that he planned to vote against approving the legislation in the Budget Committee in a session planned for Friday.
If another Republican on the panel were to join Roy, they could block the measure from reaching the floor, upending the party’s drive to push the legislation through the House before a Memorial Day recess. A number of other conservative, anti-spending Republicans sit on the panel.
“Right now, the House proposal fails to meet the moment,” Roy said. “It does not meaningfully change spending. Plus, many of the decent provisions and cuts don’t begin until 2029 and beyond. That is swamp accounting to dodge real savings.”
The legislation would extend Trump’s 2017 tax cut and temporarily enact his campaign pledges not to tax tips or overtime pay. Cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and subsidies for clean energy would partly offset the roughly $3.8 trillion cost of those tax measures, as well as increased spending on the military and immigration enforcement.
Republicans like Roy are demanding changes to the bill, arguing that their leaders did not go far enough to cut federal spending. Some had earlier insisted that the final product add nothing to the deficit. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group that calls for lower deficits, estimated that the bill would add roughly $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.
They are also unhappy that a number of the provisions in the legislation to cut spending — chief among them a measure imposing work requirements on childless Medicaid recipients without disabilities — would not kick in until 2029.
“On Medicaid work requirements: Start ‘em now,” Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania wrote on social media. “The American People are sick of half measures. Some of my congressional col-
reconciliation rules that protect the legislation from a filibuster in the Senate. The committee is responsible for merging the legislative proposals produced by 11 committees who have written various pieces of the reconciliation package into a single bill and sending it to the House floor through the Rules Committee.
Members of the Budget Committee don’t have the power to make any changes to the legislation at this point, but they must approve it to allow the bill to move forward.
With Democrats unanimously opposed, Republicans on the panel need almost unanimity to make that happen.
leagues want to do anything but LEGISLATE...”
Republican leaders had toiled to structure the legislation to protect their most politically vulnerable members from accusations that the party was moving to gut popular health care programs like Medicaid. They stopped short of a structural overhaul that would have made deep cuts to the program.
It is a treacherous balancing act for Johnson, who must try to appease his most conservative members agitating for deep spending cuts, and his swing-seat members who say voting for legislation taking an ax to popular federal programs would send them to an early political retirement.
He was sanguine emerging from the meeting in his office Thursday.
“Not everybody’s going to be delighted with every provision in a bill this large, but everyone can be satisfied, and we’re very, very close to that,” Johnson told reporters.
But conservatives such as Roy are not the only Republicans who have concerns about the legislation.
A small group of Republicans from New York and California are threatening to torpedo the bill over the state and local tax deduction. Others have called on Republican leaders to kill some of the most aggressive provisions in the legislation roll eliminating clean energy tax credits.
And even if the House can clear the legislation, a number of Republican senators have been unsparing in their criticism of the bill and suggested they would want to impose significant changes.
But first, the legislation must clear the
Budget Committee.
The panel’s role is mainly procedural but very significant for complying with the special
Any attempt to skirt the committee could lead to trouble in the Senate even if the House were to approve the bill. The reconciliation rules require that the measure be a product of the Budget Committee for it to qualify for a majority-only vote. Working around the Budget Committee could violate that rule and allow Democrats to filibuster the legislation, effectively killing it.
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered a defiant defense this week of his drastic overhaul of federal health agencies, insisting to members of Congress that he had “not fired any working scientists” and was “not withholding money for lifesaving research” despite evidence to the contrary.
In back-to-back appearances before House and Senate committees, Kennedy, a longtime critic of vaccination, also made clear that he did not think the health secretary should be in the business of making vaccine recommendations. He ducked questions about whether, if he had young children today, they would be inoculated against measles, chickenpox or polio.
“I don’t think people should be taking advice, medical advice from me,” the health secretary said.
After weeks of controversy about his plans for autism research, Kennedy also testified Wednesday that federally funded studies should focus solely on identifying “environmental toxins” — a term that Kennedy’s critics say is code for vaccines.
“I’m told that there was a 20-to-1 research ratio for genetic causes over the past 20 years,” he said, adding: “I believe that was because they did not want to look at the environmental exposure because they were scared. So I don’t think we should be funding that genetic work anymore.”
Kennedy had come to Capitol Hill, his first appearance there since becoming health secretary, to promote President Donald Trump’s budget for the next fiscal year. But his testimony devolved into a series of fiery exchanges with Democrats, who wanted to talk about the mass layoffs and cuts to research funding he has already imposed.
Engineered in part by Elon Musk and his team at the Department of Government Efficiency, the remake of the health department includes cutting 20,000 jobs — one-fourth of the health workforce. It also collapses entire agencies, including those devoted to mental health and addiction treatment, and emergency preparedness, into a new, ill-defined “Administration for a Healthy America.”
Democrats charged that in making the cuts, Kennedy had usurped the power of Congress. Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee,
pointedly directed him to language in the Constitution that gives Congress the power of the purse.
“You have an obligation to carry out the law and to implement what the Congress has done,” she said sharply. Kennedy insisted that if Congress gave his agency money, he would spend it. DeLauro shook her head, looking disgusted.
“Unbelievable,” she said. “Unbelievable.”
Kennedy clashed openly and angrily with Democratic lawmakers on both sides of the Capitol. He showed little hesitation in telling them they were wrong, and engaged in a heated back-and-forth that is unusual for any witness, much less a Cabinet secretary coming to Congress to ask for money to run his agency.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, testifies during a House Committee on Appropriations subcommittee hearing on the Health and Human Services budget on Capitol Hill in Washington, on May 14, 2025. (Eric lee/The New York Times)
“I don’t know if you understand this or whether you are just mouthing the Democratic talking points,” Kennedy said to Rep. Josh Harder, D-Calif., who asked about cuts to Medicaid.
The health secretary testified that while Trump’s budget cuts would be “painful,” they were necessary to ease the federal government’s $2 trillion deficit.
Some of Kennedy’s statements did not comport with the facts. He told the Senate health committee that no current vaccines except those for COVID-19 had been tested against placebo. That prompted the committee chair, Sen. Bill Cassidy , R-La., who had left the room, to return to correct him.
“The secretary made the statement that no vaccines except COVID have been evaluated against placebo,” Cassidy said. “That’s not true. A rotavirus, measles and HPV vaccines have been.”
Kennedy’s assertion that he has “not fired any working scientists” flies in the face of reality. Hundreds of scientists from the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration have lost their jobs as part of his plan to overhaul the Department of Health and Human Services.
The Trump administration has also frozen or canceled scores of research grants at academic institutions, many of them from
the National Institutes of Health, which falls under Kennedy’s purview. Columbia University alone has experienced significant cuts to more than 300 federal grants, many of them for medical research.
Trump has published only the broad outlines of his budget plan, which calls for deep cuts to the NIH and the CDC. In written testimony submitted to the committee, Kennedy said the cuts would save money “without impacting critical services.”
The budget blueprint, the statement said, “recognizes the fiscal challenges our country faces today, and the need to update and redirect our investments to meet the needs of a rapidly changing world.”
Republicans largely praised Kennedy, but their questions revealed that they, too, were somewhat uncomfortable with his changes. In the House, several asked about projects in their districts. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., who represents candy manufacturers, worried aloud that Kennedy’s plan to rid the food supply of certain petroleum-based dyes would cost his constituents money.
In the Senate, Cassidy called on Kennedy to articulate “a clearly defined plan or objective.” Cassidy voted to confirm Kennedy despite intense misgivings about his views on vaccines. He had asked Kennedy to testify about the job cuts at the health department last month, but the secretary did not appear.
“Much of the conversation around HHS’s agenda has been set by anonymous sources in the media and individuals with a bias against the president,” Cassidy said. “Americans need direct reassurance from the administration, from you, Mr. Secretary, that its reforms will make their lives easier, not harder.”
That may be a tall order. A recent poll by KFF, a nonpartisan health policy research organization, found that a majority of the public opposed major cuts to staffing and spending at the nation’s health agencies. A majority of Americans said the Trump administration was “recklessly making broad cuts to programs and staff, including some that are necessary for agencies to function.”
By NIRAJ CHOKSHI
Newark Liberty International Airport has faced many disruptions in recent weeks. Technology outages, air traffic controller shortages and runway construction at the busy New Jersey hub have led to scores of canceled and delayed flights.
The Federal Aviation Administration says it’s trying to improve the situation, including with software and hardware upgrades. On Wednesday, it met with airline executives to discuss how to run things smoothly by reducing the number of flights at the airport during any given hour.
In a Senate hearing on aviation safety Wednesday, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said the agency had had a “multiyear failure to keep pace with technology and staffing needs.”
What’s going on with staffing?
Air traffic control facilities nationwide have not had enough controllers — the professionals who guide planes into and out of airports — for years, a result of employee turnover, tight budgets, long training times and other factors.
There are only 22 certified controllers employed to serve Newark, which is about a third shy of the staffing target of 38, according to the FAA. The agency also employs five supervisors and nearly two dozen controllers and supervisors in training. Ten trainees can do at least some work without extra supervision, the agency said this week.
Tight staffing has at times disrupted operations at Newark. For several hours Monday, for example, limited staffing forced the FAA to prevent flights bound for Newark from leaving other airports. Those delays averaged an hour and 40 minutes and lasted as long as nearly seven hours. For part of the evening, as few as three air traffic controllers were working when the staffing target was 14.
The air traffic controllers for Newark were moved over the summer to Philadelphia from an office in Long Island, New York, where controllers still guide planes to other New York airports. The hope was that by moving the Newark operations to a more affordable area, the agency might have an easier time recruiting controllers.
But 16 of the controllers working on Newark flights are expected to return to Long Island in July 2026. Replacements are being prepared, and training classes are filled through next summer, the FAA said Tuesday. Because of the complicated nature of the work, it can take a year or more to train controllers at other facilities to handle traffic at Newark, one of the busiest airports in North America.
What’s going on with runway construction?
Since April 15, one of Newark’s three runways has been closed for construction. That has caused one to four flight cancellations per hour, peaking during the busy afternoons and evenings, according to the FAA. Arrival delays have also been common. The construction is expected to continue through June 15 and resume on weekends from September through the end of the year.
At the same time, the Philadelphia air traffic control facility has twice had brief, but concerning radar outages that made it impossible for controllers to locate the planes they were guiding.
The first of those outages left controllers rattled, with some taking leave to recover from that stress. Both outages were caused because a telecommunications line failed. A backup line was in place, but software for that line also failed, overwhelming the backup, officials said this week.
“I don’t believe there was a heightened significant danger to the flying public,” Franklin McIntosh, the FAA’s deputy chief operating officer, told senators Wednesday.
What is the FAA doing?
On Friday, the FAA installed a software upgrade that it said would help prevent outages. The agency is also working to add a third telecommunications line. And, on Wednesday, agency officials and airline officials met in Washington to discuss limiting flights at the airport.
While construction is underway, the agency plans to limit flights to 56 per hour, split evenly between arrivals and departures. That will restrict operations through next month, but not significantly, according to a New York Times analysis of flight schedules from Cirium, an aviation data firm.
The limit would then rise to 68 flights per hour, from midJune through late October. That would be a big decrease on many summer afternoons, when the number of flights currently scheduled can reach the high 70s or low 80s, according to the Cirium data.
United Airlines would be affected the most because it operates about 70% of the flights at Newark, which is one of its eight airport hubs. But if the FAA limits help to stabilize operations at the airport, it will be worth it, Andrew Nocella, United’s chief commercial officer, said at a company event in New York on Tuesday.
Nocella described the cap at 68 flights per hour as “a great outcome.”
“Hopefully, as we get through the summer and into the fall, when staffing with the FAA improves, we can increase the number,” he said. “But the most important thing is to make sure when you head out to Newark that you can get on your aircraft and you know it’s going to go and it’s going to go on time.”
Just months ago, Newark’s operations were not far behind those of other major New York-area airports. Over the 12 months that ended in January, 77% of Newark’s departures were on time, compared with 78% at Kennedy International Airport and 80% at LaGuardia Airport, according to federal data. Over that period, 76% of flights arriving at Newark were on time, compared with 77% at JFK and 79% at LaGuardia.
El peticionario, el Sr. Rafael De Juan Ruiz, cuya dirección postal es RR11 Box 5351, Bayamón, Puerto Rico 00956-9734, ha solicitado al Área de Calidad del Agua (ACA) del Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambientales (DRNA) el Permiso de Construcción (UIC-24-110021), para un sistema de inyección subterránea (SIS) Clase VC-1, bajo las disposiciones del Reglamento para el Control de la Inyección Subterránea (RCIS) y la Ley Federal de Agua Potable Segura, según la Enmienda 42 USC 300f et seq. (LFAPS).
El SIS consiste en un (1) tanque séptico de 6.5 pies de ancho por 10 pies de largo por 4 pies de profundidad líquida con una capacidad de 1,944.80 galones y un pozo filtrante de 10 pies de largo por 10 pies de ancho por 5.66 pies de profundidad líquida con un área de percolación de 226.8 pies cuadrados, en el cual se inyectarán 230 galones por día de aguas usadas provenientes de los baños y la cocina del restaurante y del baño del taller mecánico en la instalación. El referido SIS estará ubicado en la Carretera PR-167, Km 9.60, Barrio Dajaos, Bayamón, Puerto Rico.
Luego de realizar la evaluación correspondiente de los documentos presentados, el DRNA tiene la intención de emitir los Permisos de Construcción y Operación para la instalación antes indicados en conformidad con los requisitos del RCIS y de la LFAPS
Esta notificación se hace para informar que el DRNA ha preparado los borradores de los permisos de construcción y operación de tal manera que el público interesado pueda emitir sus comentarios relacionados con los mismos. Los permisos contienen las condiciones y prohibiciones necesarias para cumplir con los requisitos reglamentarios aplicables. Copia de la solicitud de permiso de construcción que radicó el peticionario ante el DRNA, los borradores de los permisos y otros documentos relevantes estarán a disposición del público para ser examinados, a petición del interesado mediante el envío de un correo electrónico a hectorarroyo@drna.pr.gov, o visitando el ACA, cuya oficina está ubicada en el Piso 3, Ala A, del Edificio de Agencias Ambientales Cruz A. Matos, Carretera PR-8838, Km 6.3, Sector El Cinco, Río Piedras, Puerto Rico. Copia de dichos documentos puede adquirirse en el ACA, entre las 8:00 a. m. y las 4:00 p. m. de lunes a viernes o escribiendo a la siguiente dirección postal: Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambientales, San José Industrial Park, 1375 Avenida Ponce de León, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00926.
Las partes interesadas o afectadas pueden enviar sus comentarios por escrito al Sr. Ángel R. Meléndez Aguilar, Gerente Interino del ACA, o solicitar una vista pública por escrito al Secretario del DRNA, a la dirección postal o correo electrónico previamente indicado.
Los comentarios por escrito o la solicitud de vista pública deberán ser enviados al DRNA no más tarde de treinta (30) días a partir de la fecha de publicación de este aviso. La fecha límite para someter comentarios puede extenderse si se estima necesario o apropiado para el interés público. La solicitud de vista pública deberá señalar la razón o las razones que, en opinión del solicitante, justifican la celebración de esta. De realizarse una vista pública, los interesados o afectados tendrán una oportunidad razonable para presentar evidencia o testimonio sobre si se emiten o deniegan los permisos, si el Secretario determina que dicha vista es necesaria o apropiada.
En San Juan, Puerto Rico, hoy 16 de abril de 2025.
Este anuncio se publica conforme a lo requerido por la Ley Núm. 4162004, según enmendada, conocida como “Ley sobre Politica Pública Ambiental”, los reglamentos aprobados a su amparo; y las leyes y reglamentos federales aplicables. El costo del Aviso Público es sufragado por la entidad peticionaria.
and construction on a runway.
Wall Street stocks ended mixed on Thursday, with gains in Cisco Systems following an upbeat forecast, while UnitedHealth tumbled after a report of a criminal investigation into the insurer.
The S&P 500 this week has further recovered from a deep selloff in April triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump’s global trade war, as investors bet Washington will reach deals to roll back steep tariffs that economists worry will drive up consumer prices.
“People think there are going to be deals, so they are just getting ahead of that, and they don’t want to be short stocks. ‘Deal anticipation’ is what I’d call it,” said Dennis Dick, a trader at Triple D Trading.
Cisco Systems jumped after the networking company raised its annual forecast, driven by the artificial intelligence boom.
UnitedHealth Group plunged to a five-year low after the Wall Street Journal reported the U.S. Department of Justice was conducting a criminal investigation into the company for possible Medicare fraud. UnitedHealth said it had not been informed of a criminal probe by federal prosecutors.
Rival health insurers Humana and Molina Healthcare also declined.
Walmart eased after the heavyweight retailer warned it would start raising prices later this month due to tariffs, even after its first-quarter U.S. comparable sales beat expectations.
Rival retailer Amazon dropped and weighed on the Nasdaq.
Walmart declined to provide a second-quarter profit outlook, joining other companies across sectors that have tweaked or pulled their forecasts, signaling that corporate America is hunkering down due to tariff-related uncertainty.
According to preliminary data, the S&P 500 gained 21.89 points, or 0.37%, to end at 5,917.59 points, while the Nasdaq Composite lost 35.47 points, or 0.19%, to 19,111.34. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 277.87 points, or 0.66%, to 42,328.93.
The S&P 500 remains about 4% below its record high
Complex PCI
Market Development Specialist – (TAR), San Juan, PR
- May require to travel/telecommute.
- Responsible for development & adoption of interventional cardiology therapies (Precision PCI, Plaque Modification, CTO) in an assigned market.
Contact Susan Cardinal, Boston Scientific Corporation, GlobalTalentAcq@bsci.com. Please include reference H4872-00914. (EOE)
close on February 19.
Earlier in the day, data showed U.S. retail sales growth slowed in April, while a separate report showed producer prices unexpectedly fell last month. That followed a relatively tame consumer price reading earlier in the week.
“We’re still waiting for that inflation pop. It’s not here yet, but we’re still waiting,” said John Augustine, chief investment officer of Huntington National Bank.
Private equity firm Thoma Bravo has sold its remaining stake in Nasdaq for approximately $3.4 billion in two separate transactions, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Thursday.
A block of approximately 25.5 million shares was divested on Tuesday, sold to JPMorgan for $80.68 each, according to the source.
Earlier, the PE firm had sold 17.33 million shares at $77.90 each on May 7, 2025, trade, raising $1.35 billion, a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission last week showed.
Nasdaq and Thoma Bravo declined to comment.
In 2023, Nasdaq struck a $10.5 billion cash-and-stock deal to buy fintech firm Adenza from Thoma Bravo, giving the PE firm a sizeable stake in the transatlantic exchange operator.
President Donald Trump walks with President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan of the United Arab Emirates at Qasr Al Watan, the presidential palace, in Abu Dhabi on Thursday, May 15, 2025. Trump arrived in the United Arab Emirates for the final leg of a Middle Eastern tour that has so far yielded a major diplomatic breakthrough with Syria and deals for U.S. firms. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
By VIVIAN NEREIM
When President Donald Trump declared from the stage of an opulent ballroom in Saudi Arabia that the United States was done nation-building and intervening, that the world’s superpower would no longer be “giving you lectures on how to live,” his audience erupted in applause.
He was effectively denouncing decades of American policy in the Middle East, playing to grievances long aired in cafes and sitting rooms from Morocco to Oman.
“In the end, the so-called nation builders wrecked far more nations than they built,” Trump said Tuesday, during an address at an investment conference in the Saudi capital of Riyadh. “And the interventionalists were intervening in complex societies that they did not even understand.”
He urged the people of the region to chart “your own destinies in your own way.”
Reactions to his speech spread swiftly on mobile phone screens in a Middle East where the American invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan — and more recently, U.S. support for Israel as it intensifies its war in the Gaza Strip, which is on the brink of starvation — are ingrained in public consciousness and criticized by monarchists and dissidents alike.
Sultan Alamer, a Saudi academic, joked
that Trump’s remarks sounded like they came from Frantz Fanon, a 20th-century Marxist thinker who wrote about the dynamics of colonial oppression. Syrians posted celebratory memes when Trump announced that he would end American sanctions on their war-ravaged country “in order to give them a chance at greatness.”
And in Yemen — another country mired in war and subject to American sanctions — Abdullatif Mohammed implied agreement with Trump’s notion of sovereignty, even as he expressed frustration with U.S. intervention.
“When will countries recognize us and let us live like the rest of the world?” Mohammed, a 31-year-old restaurant manager in the capital, Sanaa, said when asked about the speech. U.S. airstrikes pounded his city under both former President Joe Biden and Trump, targeting the Iran-backed Houthi militia, until Trump abruptly declared a ceasefire this month.
“Who is Trump to grant pardons, lift sanctions on a country, or impose them?” Mohammed said. “But that’s how the world works.”
Trump’s remarks came at the start of a four-day jaunt through three wealthy Gulf Arab states: Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. He was focused in large part on business deals, including more than $1 trillion in investment in the United
States pledged by the three Gulf governments.
But his address in Riyadh made clear that he had broader diplomatic ambitions for his trip. He expressed a “fervent wish” that Saudi Arabia follow two neighbors, the Emirates and Bahrain, to recognize the state of Israel. (Saudi officials have said that will happen only after the establishment of a Palestinian state.) He said he had a keen desire to reach a deal with Iran over its nuclear program, adding that he “never believed in having permanent enemies.”
And on Wednesday, he met the new leader of Syria, Ahmad al-Sharaa — a former jihadi who led a rebel alliance that ousted the brutal strongman Bashar Assad. Trump posed for a photograph with al-Sharaa and the Saudi crown prince in an image that dropped jaws in the region and beyond.
“Dude, what happened is truly unbelievable,” said Mohammed, the Yemeni restaurant manager.
Trump’s address was a sometimesrambling speech that lasted more than 40 minutes.
In Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam, he neglected to mention that he has said before that “Islam hates us” and that the Quran teaches “some very negative vibe.” Instead, he praised the kingdom’s heritage.
His friendliness in front of the Saudi crowd stood in contrast to Biden’s chillier approach to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto Saudi ruler who directed a yearslong bombing campaign in Yemen and has overseen a widespread crackdown on dissent while drastically loosening social restrictions. When Biden visited Saudi Arabia, he said that he told the crown prince he believed he was responsible for the 2018 killing and dismemberment of Jamal Khashoggi, a Washington Post columnist critical of the crown prince.
Trump instead heaped plaudits on the Arabian Peninsula and Crown Prince Mohammed, calling him an “incredible man.”
“In recent years, far too many Ameri-
can presidents have been afflicted with the notion that it’s our job to look into the souls of foreign leaders and use U.S. policy to dispense justice for their sins,” Trump said.
His remarks left some Arab listeners worried about what the potential evaporation of American pressure over human rights violations could mean for their countries.
Ibrahim Almadi is the son of a 75-yearold American-Saudi dual national who was arrested in the kingdom over critical social media posts; his father was released but is not allowed to leave Saudi Arabia. In an interview, Almadi said he had hoped Trump would speak to Saudi officials about his father’s case during his visit — and that he had tried without success to reach out to officials across his administration. He sees it as the type of human rights violation that previous U.S. administrations would have pressed Saudi officials on.
“They are normalizing my dad’s case, which is not normal,” he said of the Trump administration.
A White House spokesperson did not answer questions about whether the president or his aides had raised human rights issues with Saudi officials. Asked about the reaction to his address, the spokesperson, Anna Kelly, said, “The president has received widespread praise for his speech.”
Abdullah Alaoudh, a member of a Saudi opposition party in exile and the son of a prominent cleric imprisoned in the kingdom, called the speech a public relations stunt for the benefit of Crown Prince Mohammed.
He added that he found it ironic that Trump was praising a Middle East built “by the people of the region” when he was speaking to an audience dotted with foreign billionaires and “in front of an authoritarian leader who has brutally silenced all dissent.”
In the ballroom in Riyadh, Trump received a standing ovation.
INTENCIÓN
El peticionario, Sr. Miguel Arias, dueño de la propiedad arrendada a Central Drug Dorado Corp., cuya dirección postal es PO Box 1577, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00970-1577, ha solicitado al Área de Calidad de Agua (ACA) del Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambientales (DRNA) el permiso de construcción, UIC-25-65-0009, para un sistema de inyección subterránea (SIS) Clase VII, bajo las disposiciones del Reglamento para el Control de la Inyección Subterránea (RCIS) y la Ley Federal de Agua Potable Segura, según enmendada 42 USC 300f et seq. (LFAPS). El SIS consiste en un tanque de retención de 26 pies de largo por 14 pies de ancho por 8 pies de profundidad líquida, con una capacidad de 21,782 galones, en el cual se almacenarán 765 galones por día de aguas sanitarias, provenientes de los baños de .la instalación. El referido SIS está localizado en la Carretera PR-1, Km 25.5, Camino Los Navarros, Barrio Quebrada Arenas, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Luego de realizada la evaluación correspondiente de los documentos sometidos, el DRNA tiene la intención de emitir los permisos de construcción y operación para la instalación antes mencionada en conformidad con los requisitos del RCIS y de la LFAPS. Esta notificación se hace para informar que el DRNA, ha preparado los borradores de los permisos de construcción y operación de forma tal que el público interesado pueda someter sus comentarios con relación a los mismos. Los permisos contienen las condiciones y prohibiciones necesarias para cumplir con los requisitos reglamentarios aplicables. Copia de la solicitud de permiso de construcción que sometió el peticionario ante el DRNA, los borradores de los permisos y otros documentos relevantes estarán a la disposición del público para ser examinados, a petición del interesado mediante el envío de un correo electrónico a la siguiente dirección: hectorarroyo@drna.pr.gov o visitando el ACA, cuya oficina está localizada en el Piso 3 Ala A del Edificio de Agencias Ambientales Cruz A. Matos, Carretera PR-8838, Km 6.3, Sector El Cinco, Río Piedras, Puerto Rico. Copia de dichos documentos pueden adquirirse en el ACA, entre las 8:00 a.m. y las 4:00 p.m. de lunes a viernes o escribiendo a la siguiente dirección: Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambientales, San José Industrial Park, 1375 Avenida Ponce de León, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00926.
Las partes interesadas o afectadas pueden enviar sus comentarios por escrito al Sr. Ángel R. Meléndez Aguilar, Gerente Interino del ACA, o solicitar una vista pública por escrito al Secretario del DRNA, a la dirección postal o correo electrónico antes indicado. Los comentarios por escrito o la solicitud de vista pública deberán ser sometidos al DRNA no más tarde de treinta (30) días a partir de la fecha de publicación de este aviso. La fecha límite para someter comentarios puede ser extendida si se estima necesario o apropiado para el interés público. La solicitud para una vista pública deberá señalar la razón o las razones que en la opinión del solicitante ameritan la celebración de esta. De realizarse una vista pública los interesados o afectados tendrán una oportunidad razonable para presentar evidencia o testimonio sobre si se emiten o deniegan los permisos, si el Secretario determina que dicha vista es necesaria o apropiada.
En San Juan, Puerto Rico, hoy 12 de mayo de 2025.
Waldemar Quiles Pérez Secretario
Este anuncio se publica conforme a lo requerido por la Ley Núm. 4162004, según enmendada, conocida como la “Ley sobre Política Pública Ambiental”, los reglamentos aprobados a su amparo; y las leyes y reglamentos federales aplicables. El costo del Aviso Público es sufragado por la entidad peticionaria.
By JACK NICAS
José “Pepe” Mujica did not have much use for Uruguay’s three-story presidential residence, with its chandeliers, elevator, marble staircase and Louis XV furniture.
“It’s crap,” he told me last year. “They should make it a high school.”
So when he became president of his small South American nation in 2010, Mujica decided he would commute from his home: a cluttered, three-room shack the size of a studio apartment, crammed with a wood stove, overstuffed bookcases and jars of pickling vegetables.
Before his death on Tuesday, Mujica lived there for decades with his lifelong partner, Lucía Topolansky — herself a former vice president — and their three-legged dog, Manuela. They farmed chrysanthemums to sell in local markets and drove their sky blue 1987 Volkswagen Beetle to their favorite tango bars.
There was no reason, he said, that a new job should require a move.
That meant that, after sitting side-by-side with Barack Obama in the Oval Office or lecturing world leaders on the dangers of capitalism at the United Nations, Mujica would fly home in coach to a life resembling that of a poor farmer.
It was a political masterstroke. His presidency failed to accomplish all of its economic goals. But his austere lifestyle made him revered by many Uruguayans for living like them, while giving him a platform in the international press to warn that greed was eroding society. He insisted it was truly how he wanted to live, but he also recognized that it served to illustrate that politicians had long had it too good.
“We have done everything possible to make the presidency less venerated,” Mujica told my New York Times predecessor in South America, Simon Romero, in 2013, sharing with him a gourd of mate, the herbal drink passed back and forth over conversation in this part of the world.
I visited Mujica at his same home last year. He was bundled in a winter coat and wool hat in front of a wood stove, frail and hardly able to eat as a result of radiation treatment for a tumor in his esophagus. But facing a journalist who could spread his ideas to the world for perhaps one of the final times, he held court for nearly two hours, expounding on how to find purpose and beauty in life and how, he told me unprompted, “humanity, as it’s going, is doomed.”
He also explained why he believed that the trappings of elected office — the palaces, the servants, the luxury jets — were the opposite of what democracy was supposed to be about.
“The cultural remnants of feudalism remain — inside the republic. The red carpet, the bugles when the feudal lord came out of the castle onto the bridge. All that remains,” he said. “The president likes to be praised.”
He recalled a visit to Germany while he was president. “They put me in a Mercedes-Benz. The door weighed about 3,000 kilos. They put 40 motorcycles in front and
José “Pepe” Mujica, the former president of Uruguay, at his modest home on the outskirts of Montevideo, Uruguay, Aug. 14, 2024. Mujica, who died on Tuesday, May 13, showed the value in world leaders living like their constituents. (Dado Galdieri/The New York Times)
another 40 in back,” he said. “I was ashamed.”
The international press nicknamed him the world’s “poorest president,” noting his net worth was $1,800 when he took office. Mujica detested the moniker and often quoted Roman court-philosopher Seneca: “It is not the man who has too little, but the man who craves more, that is poor.”
It would be hard to find a more striking contrast to President Donald Trump, who has made living a gilded life central to his identity. In our interview, three months before the election, Mujica repeatedly brought up Trump. “It seems like a lie — a country like the United States having a candidate like Trump,” he said. “Democracy at the height of a doormat.”
Mujica entered politics in the 1960s as a bank-robbing leftist guerrilla. His group, the Tupamaros, gained notoriety for their violence. Mujica said they tried to avoid harming civilians, but added that the leftist struggle sometimes required force.
After escaping prison twice, he was imprisoned for 14 years under Uruguay’s military dictatorship, much of his sentence spent in solitary confinement. Trapped in a hole in the ground, he said, he befriended rats and a small frog to survive psychologically.
He was released as Uruguay reestablished democracy and was eventually elected to Congress, drawing attention for showing up to work on a Vespa. In 2009, voters made him president of the nation of 3.3 million.
Under Mujica, Uruguay decriminalized abortion, legalized same-sex marriage, pushed into renewable energy and became the first nation to fully legalize marijuana. Yet many of his goals, like significantly reducing inequality and improving education, fell victim to the realities of politics.
But as news of his death spread Tuesday, people across the world remembered him not for his policies. It was his humility that was his legacy.
Earlier this year, his political protégé, a former history teacher named Yamandú Orsi, took office as Uruguay’s new president. He has commuted to work from his family home, and Uruguay’s presidential mansion has mostly remained empty.
The San Juan Daily Star May 16-18, 2025 11
President Donald Trump behind the Resolute Desk as he signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Feb. 13, 2025. (Eric Lee/The New York Times)
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD
When Republicans took control of Congress in 1947, they were still angry that President Franklin D. Roosevelt had won a fourth term in 1944, and they set out to pass a constitutional amendment to limit future presidents to two terms. John Jennings, R-Tenn., stood on the House floor and said a 22nd Amendment was necessary to prevent a dictator from taking over the country.
“Without such a limit on the number of terms a man
PO BOX 6537 Caguas PR 00726
Telephones: (787) 743-3346 • (787) 743-6537 (787) 743-5606 • Fax (787) 743-5100
Dr. Ricardo Angulo Founder
Manuel Sierra General Manager
María de L. Márquez
Business Director
R. Mariani
Circulation Director
Lisette Martínez
Advertising Agency Director
Ray Ruiz Legal Notice Director
Sharon Ramírez Legal Notices Graphics Manager
Aaron Christiana Editor
María Rivera Graphic Artist Manager
may serve in the presidency, the time may come when a man of vaulting ambition becomes president,” Jennings said on Feb. 6, 1947. Such a man, backed by a “subservient Congress” and a compliant Supreme Court, could “sweep aside and overthrow the safeguards of the Constitution,” he said. Without such a law, a president could use the office’s great powers to tilt the political system in his favor and win repeated reelection. Eventually, that president could come to resemble a king, effectively unbound by the Constitution’s checks and balances.
In the decades after the country ratified the 22nd Amendment in 1951, members of both parties occasionally chafed against its restrictions, but no sitting president openly talked about evading it — until recently. Jennings’ warning on the House floor now looks prophetic: President Donald Trump is a man of vaulting ambition. Congress is largely subservient to his agenda. And he keeps mentioning the idea of a third term.
“I suspect I won’t be running again unless you say, ‘He’s so good, we’ve got to figure something else out,’” he said shortly after being reelected in November. Though Republicans in the room chuckled at the time, he said in March that he was “not joking” and that “there are methods which you could do it.”
This past weekend, he seemed to both step back from the idea and reiterate it. “It’s something that, to the best of my knowledge, you’re not allowed to do,” Trump told NBC News. But then he once again claimed that the decision was his to make. “Well, there are ways of doing it,” he said. All the while, his website continues to sell “Trump 2028” merchandise, including baseball caps for $50 apiece and $36 T-shirts that proclaim, “Rewrite the rules.”
It may be that this talk is mostly a tactical attempt to ward off the stigma of being a lame duck. Congressional Republicans have responded partly by gently disagreeing and partly by downplaying the idea as a joke. “Not without a change in the Constitution,” Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., the majority leader, told reporters in March. He added, “I think that you guys keep asking the question, and I think he’s probably having some fun with it, probably messing with you.”
But Trump’s third-term fantasizing is more dangerous than this response suggests, and it deserves more forceful pushback. He has a history, after all, of using seemingly outlandish speculation to push ideas he genuinely favors — such as overturning an election result — into mainstream discourse. He tests boundaries to see which limits are actually enforced. Even when he backs away from a provocation, he often succeeds in raising doubts about those limits. His behavior is consistent with a president who indeed wants to serve a third term, if not more, and who keeps raising the idea in the hope of getting Americans comfortable with it.
More broadly, Trump has repeatedly demonstrated his disdain for constitutional checks on a president’s
power. He has ignored parts of judges’ rulings, deported immigrants without due process and tried to eliminate the 14th Amendment’s grant of birthright citizenship through an executive order. All of this behavior suggests that he would prefer to wield power without limits.
The appropriate response from the rest of the political system — especially from Republican members of Congress, governors and others — is not to laugh off his musings. It is to assert the clarity of the law: Trump is barred from serving a third term, period.
The 22nd Amendment, to be specific, says no person shall be “elected” to the office of president more than twice, but it doesn’t say that no president shall serve more than twice. This has long led to an academic parlor game: Could a term-limited president run as a vice president and then be handed the Oval Office when his running mate resigns? Trump has said that is one method by which he might return as president.
But another amendment — the 12th — appears to rule out that possibility. Its final sentence declares that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of president shall be eligible to that of vice president of the United States.” Together, the two amendments make clear that Trump’s time in office cannot extend beyond his current term.
Republican politicians and conservative legal scholars often talk about the original intent of the Constitution’s authors, and that intent is crystal clear in this case. The goal of the 22nd Amendment was to restrict presidents to two terms. As Rep. Edward McCowen, R-Ohio, said during the House debate in 1947, “Eight years is long enough for a good president, and four years is too long for a bad one.”
In the decades since 1951, politicians from both parties occasionally called for the repeal of the 22nd Amendment, including Harry Truman and Mitch McConnell. But they did not argue that the amendment was unclear or could simply be evaded. They recognized that somebody who disagrees with a law should follow a legal process to change it. If Trump and his acolytes believe they have Congress and the states on their side, they are free to start a repeal campaign. What they should not do is pretend that any part of the Constitution is merely a suggestion. It’s the law.
Apagón por falla en válvula de gas deja sobre 140 mil clientes sin servicio, informa Josué Colón Ortiz
POR CYBERNEWS
– Una falla en la válvula principal de inyección de gas natural provocó la salida de la Unidad 5 de la Central San Juan y dejó sin servicio eléctrico a más de 140 mil clientes de LUMA Energy este jueves, informó el ingeniero Josué Colón Ortiz, conocido como el Zar de Energía.
El funcionario explicó que la reserva de generación disponible, que supera los 900 megavatios, permitió restablecer el servicio de forma acelerada. “Hace unos minutos la Unidad 5 de San Juan tuvo un percance en la válvula principal de inyección de combustible, lo que ocasionó la salida de la unidad y la interrupción del servicio a los clientes”, indicó Colón Ortiz en declaraciones a periodistas.
El ingeniero precisó que la reserva en rotación era suficiente para atender la emergencia sin mayores contratiempos. “Ya bajó de 140 mil a cerca de 60
mil clientes sin servicio. Eso demuestra que la reserva fue capaz de absorber el impacto mientras se estabilizan voltajes y frecuencia en el sistema”, sostuvo.
Colón Ortiz añadió que la expectativa es que la unidad vuelva a sincronizarse en la tarde de hoy. “La planta no ha reportado daños mayores. El problema se concentró en la válvula de gas natural. Si no surgen complicaciones adicionales, la unidad podría estar operando nuevamente en las próximas dos horas”, detalló. El Zar de Energía recalcó la importancia de contar con capacidad de reserva suficiente para responder a fallas imprevistas. “Estas unidades sirven de respaldo. Cuando ocurre un evento de contingencia, es vital tener capacidad adicional para evitar interrupciones prolongadas que pueden extenderse por horas o días”, enfatizó.
Finalmente, aclaró que la válvula afectada es parte de una conversión a gas natural realizada entre 2019 y 2020, por lo que no se trata de equipos antiguos.
JUAN – El secretario del Departamento de Corrección y Rehabilitación (DCR), licenciado Francisco Antonio Quiñones Rivera, anunció el jueves la instalación de torres con cámaras de vigilancia en las instituciones correccionales, con el fin de reforzar la seguridad en sus instalaciones.
“Este sistema de vigilancia permite visualizaciones en vivo y grabación de imágenes, así como otras herramientas de comunicación. El mismo tiene como fin velar por la seguridad de nuestros compañeros de trabajo, visitantes y los miembros de la población correccional”, indicó Quiñones Rivera en declaraciones escritas.
La inversión de 392,750 dólares contempla la colocación de estas to-
rres en los perímetros interiores y exteriores de las instituciones, así como en entradas, salidas y otras áreas designadas por la Oficina de Seguridad del DCR. El equipo operará con energía solar, garantizando su funcionamiento continuo incluso bajo condiciones adversas.
El secretario informó que un equipo de trabajo especializado será responsable de operar, manejar y mantener el sistema. Estas personas recibirán capacitación y deberán pasar una investigación de antecedentes como requisito para la asignación.
Quiñones Rivera destacó que la flexibilidad del equipo permitirá reubicar las torres según las necesidades de seguridad de cada institución, optimizando su uso para proteger al personal, visitantes y población correccional.
By MANOHLA DARGIS
For nearly three decades, Tom Cruise has been running, soaring, slugging and white-knuckling it through the “Mission: Impossible” series. It’s been fun, on and off, but it’s no wonder he looks so beaten up on the poster for the latest edition, “The Final Reckoning.” Cruise — who turns 63 this year — long seemed impervious to ordinary time, with a boyishness that lasted well into middle age. His early stardom had already granted him a kind of immortality. Yet as the lines on his face discreetly deepened, and he kept pushing himself to lunatic extremes in this series, it seemed as if he were challenging physical death itself.
Cruise is at it again in “The Final Reckoning” — the enjoyably unhinged follow-up to “Dead Reckoning Part One” (2023) — plunging into deep waters, hanging off an airborne plane and insistently defying the odds as well as his own mortality. It’s unclear why the title changed between the two parts. It might have been a marketing decision; dead is a bummer, of course, and the word implied that Cruise’s Ethan Hunt, an American operative extraordinaire, was heading toward the sort of bleak sign-off that capped Daniel Craig’s run as James Bond. Whatever the case, the change suits Cruise’s Ethan, whose abilities have grown so progressively super since the series began in 1996 they seem quasi-mystical.
“Dead Reckoning” ended with Ethan and his team trying to stop an artificial intelligence called the Entity that’s set on destroying Earth. (Why? Why not?) The AI’s plan is the ultimate power grab, although it also seems like overkill, given that humanity is already hurtling toward self-destruction. But the Entity’s exceedingly possible mission keeps everyone busy, including Ethan’s right-hand whizzes, Luther (Ving Rhames) and Benji (Simon Pegg), along with his love interest, Grace (Hayley Atwell), and the giddily anarchic one-woman wrecking machine Paris (Pom Klementieff). Mostly, though, the Entity’s annihilating designs mean that Ethan has to step up his game from superhero to global redeemer.
So, once more, Ethan et al. go unto the breach as they try to stop the Entity, which has thrown the world into chaos, inspired a doomsday cult and is trying to seize the world’s nukes — the usual. One of the dividends of the better big-studio productions is that they tend to be crowded with talented performers who can keep a straight face when delivering nonsense and sometimes bring feeling to the pro -
movies and the “Mission: Impossible” series. In each, his characters demonstrate extraordinary, even preposterous abilities, yet the movies only finally work because Cruise always makes sure that you see them — and him — sweat. He puts in the hard work for these diversions, and he wants you to know it, whether Ethan is baring his nearly naked body, as he repeatedly does in “Final Reckoning,” or is clinging to a biplane in midair, the rushing wind pulling his face into a Francis Bacon-style grimace.
the sight of a diverse group of male and female employees from both the government and military ready to sacrifice all for the greater good.
ceedings. So, as the clock runs down, characters enter and exit, including Angela Bassett’s tight-jawed American president and an army of appealing supporting players: Tramell Tillman, Janet McTeer, Shea Whigham, Holt McCallany, Nick Offerman and Hannah Waddingham.
This is the fourth “Mission: Impossible” movie directed by Christopher McQuarrie, who keeps the machinery well-oiled and smoothly running, even when cutting among multiple lines of action. (He shares screenwriting credit with Erik Jendresen.) Shrewdly, he often uses a similar approach when the pace slows and characters convene to explain what’s going on and why (mainly to us), cutting from one person to another, as each delivers a helpful sentence or two. This conversational turn-taking livens up all the information-heavy explanations and helps feed the forward momentum. None of it makes any sense, of course, no matter how sincerely the actors say their lines, yet everything flows.
Logic isn’t the reason movies like this exist or why we go to them, and one of the sustaining pleasures of the “Mission: Impossible” series has been its commitment to its own outrageousness. Cruise’s stunts have always been among the most outlandish and most memorable attractions in the series, which was spun off from the 1960s television show of the same title. He stepped into the role by escaping a wall of water and descending spiderlike into a luminously white, high-security vault, hanging by an unnervingly thin rope. The entire thing popped with cool stunts, striking locations, exotic doings and the sheer spectacle of Cruise’s intense physical performance.
Why does he keep going? Cruise has been in better, more critically acclaimed movies, but he’s most famous for — his stardom best appreciated in and signified by — the “Top Gun”
There’s vanity in Cruise’s commitment to extremes, and perhaps mania — who knows? Whatever makes him tick and inspires him to keep pushing and testing his limits is an open question, if presumably less relevant to viewers than whether the movies are actually worth seeing. “Final Reckoning” is flat-out ridiculous, but it’s a model example of blockbuster entertainment at its most highly polished, and I enjoyed it thoroughly, despite its clichés, extravagant violence and gung-ho militarism. Among other things, there is something reassuring in
Male-driven action movies often have a savior complex, with heroes who are beaten and brutalized only at last to rise vengefully triumphant. “Final Reckoning” leans hard into that familiar theme — the team faces betrayal, the fate of everyone on Earth is in Ethan’s hands — which gives the movie a quasi-religious dimension. That’s weird, no doubt, but there’s something plaintive about Ethan’s fight this time because it echoes the urgent struggles of workers in the entertainment industry (and everywhere else) to prevent their replacement by artificial intelligence. For years, Cruise has put on a very good show pretending to nearly die for our pleasure; now, though, his body really does seem on the line.
‘Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning’ Rated PG-13 for action-movie violence. Running time: 2 hours 49 minutes. In theaters.
May 16-18, 2025 14
By KENNETH CHANG
Don Pettit, NASA’s oldest active astronaut, returned to Earth on April 20, the day he turned 70 years old. That concluded his fourth trip to space — a busy 220 days at the International Space Station.
Like other crew members on the space station, Pettit conducted experiments, talked with students and exercised for hours to maintain his health and to stave off loss of bone density. But the most eye-catching work he performed in orbit was his photography.
Most people will never get a chance to go to space. “I could try to give them a glimpse through my imagery,” Pettit said during a news conference a couple weeks after his return.
Pettit noted that hard-core photographers always want to have a camera in hand. “I could look out the window and just enjoy the view,” he said. “But when I’m looking out the window, just enjoying the view, it’s like, ‘Oh, wow, a meteor. Oh, wow. Look at that. Man, there’s a flash there. What’s that?’ And ‘Oh, look at that, a volcano going off.’ It’s like, ‘OK, where’s my camera? I got to record that.’”
In an undated image provided by Don Pettit/ NASA, the Betsiboka River in Madagascar. Don Pettit/NASA via The New York Times)
Sometimes he set up five cameras at once in the space station’s cupola module, where seven windows provide panoramic views of space and Earth. Space photography is often much like night photogra-
In an undated image provided by Don Pettit/NASA, Don Pettit, NASA’s oldest active astronaut, with a camera in the International Space Station’s cupola module, where seven windows provide panoramic views of space and Earth. Don Pettit brought a photographer’s eye to orbit, capturing the artistry of the cosmos and our planet. (Don Pettit/NASA via The New York Times)
a crystal clear image of the Milky Way above a cloudy Pacific Ocean just before sunrise. The blue-purple glow emerges from the scattering of sunlight off nitrogen in Earth’s atmosphere.
In April, Pettit recorded a video of the ethereal rhythmic pulsations of auroras — the glowing light emitted when molecules in the atmosphere are bombarded by high-energy particles from the sun.
Sometimes the colorful lights were made by human activities, not cosmic phenomena. The green streaks in one picture are almost the same color as auroras, but they are the lights used by fishing boats off Thailand to attract squid.
With his camera pointing down at Earth, Pettit recorded lightning in the upper atmosphere above the Amazon basin in South America. For the video, the time was stretched in length to 33 seconds from about 6 seconds, revealing more structure in the flashes.
Pettit also took advantage of opportunities to capture the comings and goings of spacecraft from Earth — including a test launch of a SpaceX Starship rocket from Texas in November and the docking of a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft carrying cargo to the space station in December.
In an undated image provided by Don Pettit/NASA, Pettit, injected food coloring into a sphere of water on the International Space Station, creating a globule that somewhat resembled the planet Jupiter, or a very pretty marble. (Don Pettit/NASA via The New York Times
phy. Stars are dim, and exposures lasting seconds or minutes are needed to gather enough photons. But in orbit, nothing is sitting still. The space station is zooming around Earth at 5 miles per second, and Earth is also rotating.
Sometimes, Pettit took advantage of the motion for artistic beauty — lights below blurring into glowing lines, while the stars above traced arcs in the sky.
“I think these are a blend of both science and art,” Pettit wrote on the social platform X. “There is so much technogeek stuff to see, or you can simply sit back and think ‘How cool.’”
Other times, the camera was mounted on an “orbital sidereal tracker” — a homemade device that Pettit brought up from Earth that would pivot slowly to counteract the motion of the space station so that the lens remained pointed at a particular spot in the sky.
The tracker enabled a 10-second exposure to capture
During his off-duty time, Pettit also concocted fun science experiments. One showed electrically charged water droplets dancing around a Teflon knitting needle. “I want to do things in space that you can only do in space,” he said. “And I’ll worry about catching up with TV programs and things like that after I come back.”
In another experiment, he injected food coloring into a sphere of water, creating a globule that somewhat resembled Jupiter, or a very pretty marble.
Pettit also dissolved an antacid tablet within a water sphere. Without gravity to make the bubbles rise and easily escape from the water, the patterns of plop, plop, fizz, fizz are completely different in space.
He also froze thin wafers of water ice at minus 140 degrees Fahrenheit. “What would you do with such a freezer in space?” he wrote on X. “I decided to grow thin wafers of water ice for no more reason than I’m in space and I can.”
Photographing the ice wafers through polarizing filters revealed intricate crystal patterns.
Pettit is the oldest current NASA astronaut, but he is not the oldest person to go to orbit. That was John Glenn, who was the first American astronaut to circle Earth in 1962, and then flew again in 1998 on space shuttle Discovery at the age of 77.
Pettit is not even the oldest person to spend time at the space station. A private astronaut, Larry Connor, was 72 years old when he spent two weeks there in 2022 as part of a mission operated by Axiom Space of Houston.
“I’m only 70, so I’ve got a few more good years left,” Pettit said during the news conference. “I could see getting another flight or two in before I’m ready to hang up my rocket nozzles.”
By MOHANA RAVINDRANATH
Agood night’s sleep isn’t just about the number of hours you log. Getting quality sleep — the kind that leaves you feeling refreshed and ready for the day — is critical for a healthy brain.
People with disturbed sleep, like insomnia or sleep apnea, have a higher risk of developing dementia than those with no sleep issues. Poor sleep can harm your brain in other ways, too. One study found that people in their 30s and 40s with heavily disrupted sleep (such as frequent awakenings or movements) were two to three times more likely to test lower in executive function, working memory and processing speeds a decade or so later.
Scientists think that deep sleep and rapid eye movement (or REM) sleep are particularly influential when it comes to brain health and dementia risk. A study published in March on people with deep sleep and REM deficiencies found that the subjects’ brains showed signs of atrophy in MRI scans 13 to 17 years after the deficiencies were observed; the atrophy looked similar to what you’d find in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease.
What scientists know so far
When you’re asleep, your brain continuously cycles through four distinct phases: Two stages of lighter sleep, when your body relaxes and your heart rate and temperature drop; deep sleep or slow wave sleep, when brain activity slows; and REM, when you typically dream. The brain generally takes about 90 minutes to cycle through all four stages and then restarts the process.
Deep sleep and REM help your brain “heal itself” from fatigue and stress and consolidate memories, said Matthew Pase, an associate professor at the School of Psychological Sciences at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia. In deep sleep, your brain regulates metabolism and hormones; it also acts as a “rinse” for the brain, clearing out waste. REM is when your brain processes emotions and new information you picked up when you were awake.
The two phases influence dementia risk in different ways, scientists think.
As part of the rinsing process in deep sleep, your brain flushes out amyloid proteins that are a hallmark of Alzheimer’s. Years of interrupted deep sleep and incomplete flushing — known as glymphatic failure — could hasten the onset of dementia, said Dr. Maiken Nedergaard, a neurology professor at the Uni-
Two particular phases in your nightly routine seem to play outsize roles in cognitive health. (Georgette Smith/The New York Times)
versity of Rochester Medical Center who researches the glymphatic system.
Scientists understand less about how REM is tied to dementia risk, said Dr. Roneil Malkani, an associate professor of sleep medicine at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine.
A 2017 study of more than 300 people over 60 found that a shorter amount of nightly REM sleep, and taking longer to get to the REM phase in each sleep cycle, were both predictors for dementia later in life. That could be because REM is “vitally important” for storing and processing memories, and losing that capacity both weakens the brain’s defenses against cognitive decline and can accelerate atrophy in parts of the brain that aren’t used, said Pase, who co-wrote the study.
It’s also hard to tease out the “chicken and egg” relationship between sleep and dementia, and whether poor sleep definitively causes it, Pase said. Adults (particularly women) naturally spend less time in deep and REM sleep as they age. Scientists already know aging itself increases dementia risk, but dementia also tends to worsen sleep. It’s possible the two processes “compound each other,” he said.
Tips for a better night’s sleep
It’s generally difficult to target individual stages of sleep for improvement, and as you get older, experts think it may be harder to change the brain’s sleep cycles. But there’s no
downside to improving your sleep hygiene, which is an effective way to boost your sleep overall, including deep and REM sleep, Malkani said.
Getting about seven hours of sleep a night is the easiest step you can take. That gives your brain enough time to cycle through its stages between four and seven times, he said.
Research has shown that people who sleep six hours or less a night in their 50s, 60s and 70s have a 30% increased risk of dementia later in life, suggesting that it’s never too late to improve your sleep, said Bryce Mander, an associate professor of psychiatry and human behavior at the University of California, Irvine.
Having a consistent sleep and wake time can help you fall asleep more easily, said Zsófia Zavecz, a postdoctoral researcher at the Adaptive Brain Lab at the University of Cambridge.
What’s more, parts of the brain that are used heavily during the day tend to exhibit slower brain waves during sleep, so doing anything that “meaningfully engages the brain for a while,” like learning a new skill, could exhaust certain parts and increase their need for restorative, slow-wave sleep, Zavecz said.
Exercising can keep you mentally engaged and increase blood flow to the brain, which is helpful in glymphatic clearance, Nedergaard said. Minimizing stress also boosts
the process, she added.
So how do you know if you’re getting enough sleep? Wearable trackers or smartphone apps can estimate the amount of time you spend in each cycle, but Malkani said it’s more helpful to ask yourself, “How do I feel when I wake up?” And if you wake up in the middle of the night, ask “How long did it take me to fall back asleep?”
In general, setting aside enough time to sleep is the best way to ensure your brain reaches deeper stages — and depending on deficits, it may spend more time in REM or deep sleep as it cycles, Pase said. “Let the brain do its thing, and it will shuffle around as it needs,” he said.
Celebrando en este año 2025 mis más de 30 años de servicio en las bienes raíces. Agradezco y comparto este logro con mis amigos, clientes, colaboradores, y con mi familia, que siempre me han apoyado y confiado en mí... ¡Bendiciones!
VENTA DE PROPIEDADES
GUAYNABO-INCOME PROPERTY
URB TORRIMAR Tres viviendas: Principal 4H, 3B, Marquesina para 4 autos, con dos apartamentos Independientes 1H, 1B, S, C, C, c/u. Cerca de Colegios, Supermercados y avenidas principales. De $690K Rebajado $585K
CAGUAS- HACIENDA SAN JOSE
“LAS NUBES” ¡Vive con estilo resort!
Localizacion privilegiada, cerca de colegios, malls y autopistas. Area recreativa con piscina, canchas de tennis, baloncesto,
pickeball y volleyball. Propiedad cuenta con 4H/4.5 baños. Triple marquesina, terrraza, cocina equipada, doble seguridad y muchos extras en 1,000 mts. llanos. Llame para cita. $989,000. NAGUABO-URB. HACIENDA GRANDE
Casa con solar de 1,081 mts. Con 3H / 2.5 B, Terraza, Cocina equipada, Tormenteras, Placas solares y otros muchos extras. $290,000. VENTA SOLAR ENTRE JUNCOS Y SAN LORENZO-VALENCIANO ABAJO- Solar con 1.86 cuerdas llanas con acceso a agua y luz. $95,000 O.M.O.
Tengo cliente Cualificado y con dinero en mano para comprar en área de Juncos
TENGO CLIENTES CUALIFICADOS POR LA BANCA PARA COMPRA Y EXTRAORDINARIOS CLIENTES PARA ALQUILER Y PARA COMPRAS CASH
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIANDO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
SALA DE GUAYANILLA EN SABANA GRANDE NOEL CASTELLAR
MALDONADO Y MARILYN
LUGO ARROYO
Peticionarios Vs. EX-PARTE
Civil Núm.: GY2025CV00002.
Sobre: EXPEDIENTE DE DOMINIO. EDICTO. El Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, a todo el que tenga derecho real sobre el inmueble descrito en la Petición de Expediente de Dominio, a las personas ignoradas a quienes pueda perjudicar la inscripción solicitada, así como los colindantes, causahabientes o herederos y en general a toda persona que desee oponerse. Por la presente se le notifica que comparezca, si creyera que le conviene, a este Honorable Tribunal, dentro de veinte (20) días a partir de la publicación de este Edicto, el cual se publicará por tres (3) veces y exponer lo que a sus derechos convenga en el Expediente de Dominio promovido por el peticionario para adquirir el dominio de la siguiente propiedad: “RUSTICO: Solar radicado en el Barrio Santo Domingo del término municipal de Peñuelas, Puerto Rico con una cabida superficial de MIL OCHOCIENTOS CUARENTA PUNTO DOS MIL DOSCIENTOS VEINTIUN METROS CUADRADOS (1,840.2221 m/c) y en lindes por el Norte con terrenos de Doña Milagros Toucet antes, hoy su sucesión; por el Sur con terrenos de Don Carlos H. Castellar Maldonado y servidumbre de paso que conduce a carretera municipal; por el Este con terrenos de Don Eduardo Castellar Pacheco antes, hoy su sucesión, con terrenos de Don José Orlando Castellar Pacheco antes, hoy su sucesión, y en parte con terrenos de Don Nelson Castellar Pacheco antes, hoy su sucesión; y por el Oeste con terrenos de Don Luis Castellar Velázquez. Contiene una estructura construida en hormigón armado y bloques dedicada a vivienda, dividida en tres (3) cuartos dormitorios, sala-comedor y cocina unidos, dos (2) baños y balcón y un garaje aparte”. Debe notificar con copia de sus alegaciones a la representación legal del promovente, Lcdo. Joseph Brocco Santiago, P.O. Box 608, Peñuelas, Puerto Rico 00624-0608, Teléfono 787-8363020. En yazco, Puerto Rico, a 29 de enero de 2025. CARMEN G. TIRÚ QUIÑONES, SECRETARIA REGIONAL. DELIA APONTE VELÁZQUEZ,
SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL I. LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA DE HATILLO FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION COMO AGENTE DE SERVICIO DE WILMINTONG SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BYT SOLELY AS CERTIFICATE TRUSTEE OF BOSCO CREDIT II TRUST SERIES 2017-1
Demandante Vs. ULDAMAR MARTÍNEZ GERENA, JORGE ALBERTO GINES
SEDA T/C/C JORGE A. GINES SEDA Y LA SOCIEDAD LEGAL DE GANANCIALES COMPUESTA POR AMBOS; GOBIERNO FEDERAL DE LOS EEUU DE AMÉRICA Demandados Civil Núm.: CFCD2010-0090. Sobre: EJECUCIÓN DE HIPOTECA. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS EE. UU., EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PR, SS. AVISO DE VENTA EN PÚBLICA SUBASTA. Yo, ÁNGEL D. TORRES PÉREZ, Alguacil del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Camuy, a la parte demandada y al público en general les notifico que, cumpliendo con un Mandamiento que se ha librado en el presente caso por el Secretario del Tribunal de epígrafe con fecha 24 de marzo de 2025, y para satisfacer la Sentencia dictada en el caso de autos fechada 31 de julio de 2012, notificada el 2 de agosto de 2012, procederé a vender el día 10 DE JUNIO DE 2025, A LAS 9:00 DE LA MAÑANA, en mi oficina, localizada en el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Camuy, al mejor postor en pago de contado y en moneda de los Estados Unidos de América, cheque certificado y/o giro postal, todo título, derecho o interés de la parte demandada sobre la siguiente propiedad: SOLAR NÚMERO 5: RÚSTICA: Parcela localizada en el BARRIO PUEBLO del municipio Hatillo, Puerto Rico, con una cabida superficial de 1,042.3545 metros cuadrados. En lindes por el NORTE, en distancia de 21.577 metros con Miguel Ángel García Molinari; por el SUR, en una distancia de 21.570 metros con la calle dedicada a uso público; por
el ESTE, en una distancia de 48.059 metros con solar número 4; y por el OESTE, en una distancia de 48.590 metros con solar número 6 a segregarse. TRACTO: Es segregación de la finca #22,851 de Hatillo. Inscrita al Tomo KARIBE de Hatillo, Registro Inmobiliario Digital del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Sección Segunda (II) de Arecibo, Finca Número 26,222. Dirección Física: Urb. Las Praderas #5, Hatillo, PR. Con el importe de dicha venta se habrá de satisfacer a la parte demandante las cantidades adeudadas, o sea, la suma principal de $418,125.90 más intereses al tipo convenido y demás términos y condiciones, según la Sentencia dictada en el caso de epígrafe, por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Hatillo. La PRIMERA SUBASTA se llevará a cabo el día 10 DE JUNIO DE 2025, A LAS 9:00 DE LA MAÑANA, en la cual el tipo mínimo será de $424,650.00. De no haber adjudicación en la primera subasta, se celebrará una SEGUNDA SUBASTA, el día 17 DE JUNIO DE 2025, A LAS 9:00 DE LA MAÑANA, en el mismo lugar, en la cual el tipo mínimo será de dos terceras (2/3) partes del tipo mínimo fijado en la primera subasta, o sea, la cantidad de $283,100.00. De no haber adjudicación en la segunda subasta, se celebrará una TERCERA SUBASTA, el día 25 DE JUNIO DE 2025, A LAS 9:00 DE LA MAÑANA, en el mismo lugar, en la cual el tipo mínimo será la mitad (1/2) del tipo mínimo fijado en la primera subasta, o sea, la cantidad de $212,325.00. A la propiedad no le afectan gravámenes preferentes. A la propiedad le afecta el siguiente gravamen (a ejecutarse): Hipoteca en garantía de un pagaré a favor de RG Premier Bank of Puerto Rico, o a su orden, por la suma principal de $424,650.00, con intereses al 6.875% anual, vencedero el día 1 de mayo de 2038, constituida mediante la escritura número 40, otorgada en Arecibo, Puerto Rico, el día 18 de abril de 2008, ante el notario Luis Sevillano Sánchez, e inscrita al tomo Karibe de Hatillo, finca número 26,222, inscripción 5ta y última. A la propiedad le afectan los siguientes gravámenes posteriores: Embargo Federal, contra Jorge A. Gines Seda, seguro social patronal número 66-0582519, por la suma de $16,175.60, notificación número 419162808, presentado el día 13 de febrero de 2008 y anotado al folio 193, Asiento 2, del libro de Embargos Federales número 3. Fecha límite de renovación 19 de diciembre de 2017. Embargo Federal,
contra Jorge A. Gines Seda, seguro social patronal número 66-0582519, por la suma de $5,980.37, notificación número 495787108, presentado el día 4 de diciembre de 2008 y anotado al folio 228, Asiento 4, del libro de Embargos Federales número 3. Fecha límite de renovación 9 de julio de 2018. Embargo Federal, contra Jorge A. Gines Seda, seguro social patronal número 66-0582519, por la suma de $1,445.00, notificación número 504023408, presentado el día 21 de enero de 2009, anotado al folio 235, Asiento 3, del libro de Embargos Federales número 3. Fecha límite de renovación 1 de diciembre de 2014. Embargo Federal, contra Jorge A. Gines Seda, seguro social patronal número 66-0582519, por la suma de $95.80, notificación número 929493613, presentado el día 11 de abril de 2013 y anotado al folio 161, Asiento 3, del libro de Embargos Federales número 4. Fecha límite de renovación 21 de abril de 2020. Se le advierte a los licitadores que la adjudicación se hará al mejor postor, quien deberá consignar el importe de su oferta en el mismo acto de la adjudicación en moneda de curso legal de los Estados Unidos de Norteamérica en efectivo, cheque certificado o giro postal a nombre del Alguacil del Tribunal, y para conocimiento de la parte demandada y de toda(s) aquella(s) persona(s) que tenga (n) interés inscrito con posterioridad a la inscripción de los gravámenes que se están ejecutando, que los mismos serán eliminados del Registro de la Propiedad, y para conocimiento de los licitadores y el público en general, y para su publicación en un periódico de circulación general, una vez por semana durante el termino de dos (2) semanas consecutivas con un intervalo de por lo menos siete (7) días entre ambas publicaciones, y para su fijación en tres (3) lugares públicos del municipio en que ha de celebrarse la venta, tales como, la Alcaldía, el Tribunal y la Colecturía, y se le notificará además a la parte demandada y a su abogado o abogada vía correo certificado con acuse de recibo siempre que haya comparecido al pleito. Si el (la) deudor (a) por Sentencia no comparece al pleito, la notificación será enviada vía correo certificado con acuse de recibo a las últimas direcciones conocidas. Se les advierte a todos los interesados que todos los documentos relacionados con la presente acción de ejecución de hipoteca, así como la de la subasta, estarán disponibles para ser examinados en la Secretaría
del Tribunal. Se entenderá que todo licitador acepta como bastante la titulación y que las cargas y gravámenes anteriores y los preferentes, si los hubiere al crédito de ejecutante, continuarán subsiguientes entendiéndose que el rematante los acepta y queda subrogado en la responsabilidad de los mismos, sin destinarse a su extinción el precio del remate. Y para conocimiento de la parte demandada, de los acreedores posteriores, de los licitadores, partes interesadas y público en general, expido el presente Aviso para su publicación en los lugares públicos correspondientes. Librado en Camuy, Puerto Rico, a 30 de abril de 2025. ÁNGEL D. TORRES PÉREZ, ALGUACIL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA DE MAYAGÜEZ JOSÉ DE DIEGO
CENTENO VEGA Y SU ENEIDA ROSADO RIVERA, LA SOCIEDAD DE GANANCIALES QUE TIENEN CONSTITUIDA ENTRE SÍ Y JOSÉ DIEGO
CENTENO ROSADO
Demandantes Vs. JUAN FRANCISCO ORTEGA HERNÁNDEZ
Y SU ESPOSA CARMEN B. ORTIZ MORALES; LUIS A. SALVÁ ACOSTA
Y SU ESPOSA ARLENE SAURÍ GONZÁLEZ; ARSENIO RAMOS LÓPEZ
Y SU ESPOSA LUZ M. MEDINA GAUD; JOSÉ M. T/C/C JOSÉ MARTÍNEZ
MERCADO Y SU ESPOSA OLGA E. T/C/C OLGA ROSADO MORA JOSÉ
C. DELGADO DONATE
Y SU ESPOSA CARMEN T/C/C CARMEN R. ROSADO MORA; LA SUCESIÓN PRESUNTA Y DESCONOCIDA DE CARMELO ROSADO GONZALEZ CAMPUESTA
POR A, B Y C; OLGA MORA MARTÍNEZ, JOSÉ
A. ROSADO CRUZ; LUIS M. DÍAZ LÓPEZ
Y SU ESPOSA LEIGH VANESSA MILLÁN GARCÍA; ALFREDO COLÓN MALDONADO; LUIS A. BÁEZ LÓPEZ
Y SU ESPOSA MARÍA
CORSI LÓPEZ; LA SUCESIÓN PRESUNTA
Y DESCONOCIDA DE JOSE ÁNGEL
COLÓN ALEJANDRO
COMPUESTA POR: JOSÉ ÁNGEL COLÓN
MALDONADO; ERICK COLÓN MALDONADO; CARLOS COLÓN MALDONADO Y EDWIN COLÓN MALDONADO Y ALFREDO COLÓN MALDONADO; LYDIA MALDONADO FEBUS; FULANO DE TAL Y SUTANA DE TAL
Demandados
Civil Núm.: CB2025CV00004.
Acción Civil Sobre: TRACTO INTERRUMPIDO Y USUCAPIÓN. EMPLAZAMIENTO POR EDICTO. ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO, ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS EUA. A: LA SUCESIÓN PRESUNTA Y DESCONOCIDA DE JUAN FRANCISCO ORTEGA HERNÁNDEZ, COMPUESTA POR A, B Y C; LA SUCESIÓN PRESUNTA Y DESCONOCIDA DE CARMEN B. ORTIZ MORALES, COMPUESTA POR D, E Y F; ARSENIO RAMOS LÓPEZ Y SU ESPOSA LUZ M. MEDINA GAUD, JOSÉ A. ROSADO CRUZ, LUIS M. DÍAZ LÓPEZ Y SU ESPOSA LEIGH VANESSA MILLÁN GARCÍA, LUIS A. BÁEZ LÓPEZ Y SU ESPOSA MARÍA CORSI LÓPEZ Y/O SU SUCESIÓN PRESUNTA Y DESCONOCIDA COMPUESTA POR G, H E I; LA SUCESIÓN DESCONOCIDA DE FULANO DE TAL Y SUTANA DE TAL Y CUALQUIER PERSONA IGNORADA QUE PUDIERA TENER INTERÉS DOMINICAL EN LA PROPIEDAD OBJETO DE LA PRESENTE ACCIÓN CIVIL. Por la presente se les notifica a ustedes, que se ha presentado en la Secretaría del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de Mayagüez, la demanda de epígrafe, en la que, en síntesis, se alega que son ustedes parte indispensable en la demanda sobre tracto interrumpido sobre un predio de terreno que en el que podrían tener algún interés y que se describe del siguiente modo: “RÚSTICA: Parcela de terreno marcada con el número 11 en el plano de lotificación, localizada en el Barrio Boquerón del término municipal de Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, con una cabida superficial de 900.11 metros cuadrados. En lindes por el
NORTE: con el Solar Núm. 10; por el SUR: con el Solar Núm. 12; por el ESTE: con servidumbre comunal y por el OESTE: con la Calle Principal.” Inscrita al folio 151 del tomo 894 de Cabo Rojo, Finca 30382 del Registro de la Propiedad de San Germán. Es abogado de la parte demandante el Lcdo. Jaime Rodríguez Rivera, quien tiene bufete abierto en el #30 de la Calle Reparto Piñero, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 009695650, Teléfono 787-720-9553 y se notifica a ustedes que de no comparecer a contestar esta demanda dentro de las treinta (30) días siguientes después de haberse publicado el edicto, la parte demandante podrá solicitar la anotación de rebeldía y lograr que se dicte Sentencia, concediéndosele el remedio solicitado sin mas sin más citarles ni oírles. Usted deberá presentar su alegación responsiva a través del Sistema Unificado de Manejo y Administración de Casos (SUMAC), al cual puede acceder utilizando la siguiente dirección electrónica: HTTPS://WWW.PODERJUDICIAL.PR/INDEX.PHP/ TRIUBNAL-ELECTRONICO/, salvo que se represente por derecho propio, en cuyo caso deberá presentar su alegación responsiva en la Secretaría del Tribunal. Si usted deja de presentar su alegación responsiva dentro del referido término, el Tribunal podrá dictar sentencia en rebeldía en su contra y conceder el remedio solicitado en la demanda, o cualquier otro, si el tribunal, en el ejercicio de su sana discreción, lo entiende procedente. Extendido bajo mi firma y sello del Tribunal, en Mayagüez, Puerto Rico, a 30 de abril de 2025. LCDA. NORMA G. SANTANA IRIZARRY, SECRETARIA. YAHAIRA TORRES MATÍAS, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA DE AGUAS BUENAS COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CRÉDITO AGUAS BUENAS
Parte Demandante V. JORGE ALEXIS PÉREZ AYALA
Parte Demandada
Civil Núm.: AB2024CV00212. Sala: 804. Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO. EMPLAZAMIENTO POR EDICTO. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS, EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO, SS. A: JORGE ALEXIS PÉREZ AYALA.
POR LA PRESENTE se le emplaza y requiere para que notifique a:
AGS LEGAL GROUP, LLC
Abogados de la parte demandante
Lcdo. Ricardo A. Acevedo Bianchi - RUA 20637
Lcdo. José R. González RiveraRUA 13105
Lcdo. Juan A. Santos BerríosRUA 9774
P.O. Box 10242
Humacao, Puerto Rico 00792
Teléfono: (939) 545-4300
Email: rab@agslegalpr.com o jrg@agslegalpr.com
POR LA PRESENTE se le emplaza para que presente al tribunal su alegación responsiva, con copia a la representación legal de la parte demandante, dentro de los 30 días de haber sido publicado este emplazamiento, excluyéndose el día su publicación. Usted deberá presentar su alegación responsiva a través del Sistema Unificado de Manejo y Administración de Casos (SUMAC), al cual puede acceder utilizando la siguiente dirección electrónica: https:// unired.ramajudicial.pr/sumac/, salvo que se represente por derecho propio, en cuyo caso deberá presentar su alegación responsiva en la secretaría del tribunal. Si usted deja de presentar su alegación responsiva dentro del referido término, el tribunal podrá dictar sentencia en rebeldía en su contra y conceder el remedio solicitado en la demanda, o cualquier otro, si el tribunal, en el ejercicio de su sana discreción, lo entiende procedente. Extendido bajo mi firma y Sello del Tribunal, en Caguas, Puerto Rico, hoy día 16 de abril de 2025. IRASEMIS DÍAZ SÁNCHEZ, SECRETARIA. MARIEL CRUZ RODRÍGUEZ, SUB-SECRETARIA.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA SUPERIOR DE CAGUAS COOPERATIVA DE AHORRO Y CRÉDITO AGUAS BUENAS
Parte Demandante V. IAN DANIEL GARCÍA DOMÍNGUEZ Parte Demandada Civil Núm.: CG2024CV04550. Sala: 801. Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO. EMPLAZAMIENTO
POR EDICTO. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS, EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO, SS. A: IAN DANIEL GARCÍA DOMÍNGUEZ.
POR LA PRESENTE se le emplaza y requiere para que notifique a: AGS LEGAL GROUP, LLC Abogados de la parte demandante
Lcdo. Ricardo A. Acevedo Bianchi - RUA 20637
Lcdo. José R. González RiveraRUA 13105
Lcdo. Juan A. Santos BerríosRUA 9774
P.O. Box 10242
Humacao, Puerto Rico 00792
Teléfono: (939) 545-4300
Email: rab@agslegalpr.com o jrg@agslegalpr.com
POR LA PRESENTE se le emplaza para que presente al tribunal su alegación responsiva, con copia a la representación legal de la parte demandante, dentro de los 30 días de haber sido publicado este emplazamiento, excluyéndose el día su publicación. Usted deberá presentar su alegación responsiva a través del Sistema Unificado de Manejo y Administración de Casos (SUMAC), al cual puede acceder utilizando la siguiente dirección electrónica: https:// unired.ramajudicial.pr/sumac/, salvo que se represente por derecho propio, en cuyo caso deberá presentar su alegación responsiva en la secretaría del tribunal. Si usted deja de presentar su alegación responsiva dentro del referido término, el tribunal podrá dictar sentencia en rebeldía en su contra y conceder el remedio solicitado en la demanda, o cualquier otro, si el tribunal, en el ejercicio de su sana discreción, lo entiende procedente. Extendido bajo mi firma y Sello del Tribunal, en Caguas, Puerto Rico, hoy día 22 de abril de 2025. IRASEMIS DÍAZ SÁNCHEZ, SECRETARIA. SANDRA J. TRINIDAD
CAÑUELAS, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA DE JUANA DÍAZ ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC COMO AGENTE DE ACE ONE FUNDING, LLC
Parte Demandante Vs. RICHARD TORRES NÚÑEZ Parte Demandada Civil Núm.: JD2024CV00507. Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO. EMPLAZAMIENTO POR EDICTO. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS, EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO, SS. A: RICHARD TORRES NÚÑEZ - BO GUAYABAL SEC TOCADILLO CARR 149, JUANA DÍAZ PR 00795; HC 5 BOX 13260, JUANA DÍAZ PR 007959512.
POR LA PRESENTE se le emplaza y requiere para que conteste la demanda dentro de los treinta (30) días siguientes a la publicación de este Edicto. Usted deberá presentar su alegación responsiva a través del Sistema Unificado de Manejo y Administración
de Casos (SUMAC), la cual puede acceder utilizando la siguiente dirección electrónica: https://www.poderjudicial.pr/ index.php/tribunal-electronico, salvo que se represente por derecho propio, en cuyo caso deberá presentar su alegación responsiva en la secretaría del tribunal. Si usted deja de presentar su alegación responsiva dentro del referido término, el tribunal podrá dictar sentencia en rebeldía en su contra y conceder el remedio solicitado en la demanda o cualquier otro sin más citarle ni oírle, si el tribunal en el ejercicio de su sana discreción, lo entiende procedente. El sistema SUMAC notificará copia al abogado de la parte demandante, Osvaldo L. Rodríguez Fernández cuya dirección es: P.O. Box 71418 San Juan, Puerto Rico 009368518, teléfono (787) 993-3731 a la dirección notificaciones@ orf-law.com. EXTENDIDO
BAJO MI FIRMA y el sello del Tribunal, en JUANA DÍAZ, Puerto Rico, hoy día 14 de marzo de 2025. CARMEN G. TIRÚ QUIÑONES, SECRETARIA. GLORIVEE MORALES SÁEZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE BAYAMÓN SALA SUPERIOR DE GUAYNABO
BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO
Demandante V. SUCESIÓN DE RAFAEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ T/C/C RAFAEL A HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ Y RAFAEL HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ COMPUESTA POR Y OTROS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: BY2021CV04209. (Salón 201). Sobre: EJECUCIÓN DE HIPOTECA: PROPIEDAD RESIDENCIAL. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO.
FERNANDO J. GIERBOLINI GONZÁLEZ - FGIERBOLINI@ MSGLAWPR.COM. A: PERENEJCO DE TAL; PERENEJCA DE TAL; MENGANO DE TAL Y CIRIAO DE TAL COMO MIEMBROS
DESCONOCIDOS Y/O PARTES CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE RAFAEL
ÁNGEL HERNÁNDEZ
GONZÁLEZ T/C/C
RAFAEL A. HERNÁNDEZ
GONZÁLEZ Y RAFAEL HERNÁNDEZ GONZÁLEZ Y EN LA SUCESIÓN DE ALIDA ROSA OCEJO BRIGANTI T/C/C ÁLIDA
R. OCEJO T/C/C ÁLIDA
T. OCEJO T/C/C ALIDA
R. OCEJO BRIGANTI
T/C/C ÁLIDA ACEJO DE HERNÁNDEZ T/C/C ÁLIDA ACEJO BRIGANTI - 3H
CALLE MARGARITA, VILLA CLEMENTINA, GUAYNABO, P.R. 00969. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 09 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 13 de mayo de 2025. En Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, el 13 de mayo de 2025. ALICIA AYALA SANJURJO, SECRETARIA. SARA ROSA VILLEGAS, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE FAJARDO SALA SUPERIOR DE FAJARDO
GOBIERNO MUNICIPAL AUTÓNOMO DE FAJARDO
Demandante V. JOSEFINA MATEO ORTIZ Y OTROS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: FA2024CV00834. (Salón: 301). Sobre: EXPROPIACIÓN FORZOSA. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO.
JOSEPHINE M. RODRIGUEZ RIOS - JOSEPHINE.RODRIGUEZ@GMAIL. COM. A: JOSEFINA MATEO ORTIZ - 261 CALLE AMPARO, FAJARDO, PR 00738; JOHN DOE Y DUEÑO(S) DESCONOCIDO(S) Y/O CUALQUIER PERSONA CON ALGÚN POSIBLE INTERÉS.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 12 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debi-
damente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 12 de mayo de 2025. En Fajardo, Puerto Rico, el 12 de mayo de 2025. WANDA SEGUÍ REYES, SECRETARIA. SHEILA ROBLES HERNÁNDEZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNA DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA DE MAYAGÜEZ STEPHEN LOUIS VEGA; ROBERT JR VEGA; MELANIE KATE VEGA
Demandantes Vs. MICHAEL LOUIS VEGA
Demandado
Civil Núm.: MZ2025CV00585. Sobre: LIQUIDACIÓN DE COMUNIDAD DE BIENES HEREDITARIOS. EMPLAZAMIENTO POR EDICTO. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS EE.UU., EL ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE P.R., SS.
A: MICHAEL LOUIS VEGA - 126 BROADMERE RD. STRATFORD, CT 06614. POR LA PRESENTE: Se le notifica a usted, Michael Louis Vega, que la parte demandante de epígrafe ha radicado en esta Secretaría una Demanda de Liquidación de Comunidad de Bienes Hereditarios que aquí se menciona. POR LA PRESENTE se le emplaza y requiere para que conteste la Demanda de Liquidación de Comunidad de Bienes Hereditarios dentro de los treinta (30) días siguientes a la publicación de este Edicto. Usted deberá presentar su alegación responsiva a través del Sistema Unificado de Manejo y Administración de Casos (SUMAC), al cual puede acceder utilizado la Siguiente dirección electrónica: https://unired.ramajudicial.pr, salvo que se represente por derecho propio, en cuyo caso deberá presentar su alegación responsiva en la secretaría del Tribunal. Si usted deja de presentar su alegación responsiva dentro del referido término, el tribunal podrá dictar sentencia
en rebeldía en su contra y conceder el remedio solicitando en la demanda, o cualquier otro, si el tribunal en el ejercicio de su sana discreción, lo entiende procedente.
LCDA. LOURDES M. ORTIZ PAGÁN 9,103 P.O. BOX 593 CABO ROJO, PR 00623 Tel (787) 831-1984 / Fax 833-5118 lourdesm_ortizpagan@hotmail.com EXPEDIDO POR ORDEN DEL TRIBUNAL, en Mayagüez, Puerto Rico hoy 30 de abril de 2025. LCDA. NORMA G. SANTANA IRIZARRY, SECRETARIA. YAHAIRA TORRES MATÍAS, SUB-SECRETARIA. LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN JUAN
MORTGAGE ASSETS MANAGEMENT, LLC
Demandante V. LA SUCESIÓN DE JORGE OSVALDO PÉREZ DÍAZ, COMPUESTA POR YOEL MAX PÉREZ CORDERO, JORGE RAMÓN PÉREZ BERA, LUZ NANETTE PÉREZ
BERA, FULANO DE TAL Y FULANA DE TAL COMO POSIBLES HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN; CENTRO DE RECAUDACIÓN DE INGRESOS
MUNICIPALES; ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA
Demandados
Civil Núm.: SJ2025CV00973.
Sobre: EJECUCIÓN DE HIPOTECA. EDICTO DE INTERPELACIÓN. ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, PRESIDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS, ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO, S.S. A: LA SUCESIÓN DE JORGE OSVALDO PÉREZ DÍAZ, COMPUESTA POR YOEL MAX PÉREZ CORDERO, JORGE RAMÓN PÉREZ BERA, LUZ NANETTE PÉREZ BERA, FULANO DE TAL Y FULANA DE TAL COMO POSIBLES HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN.
El Artículo 1578 del Código Civil de 2020, dispone: “Transcurridos treinta (30) días desde que se haya producido la delación, cualquier persona interesada puede solicitar al tribunal que le señale al llamado un plazo, para que manifieste si acepta la herencia o si la repudia. Este plazo no excederá de treinta (30) días. El tribunal apercibirá al llamado de que, si transcurrido el plazo señalado no ha manifestado su voluntad de aceptar la herencia o de repudiarla, se dará por aceptada.” Por la
presente el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, conforme al Art. 1578, supra, y el caso Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria vs. Latinoamericana de Exportación, Inc., 164 DPR 689 (2005), les ordena que el término de treinta (30) días, hagan declaración aceptado o repudiando la herencia del causante, JORGE OSVALDO PÉREZ DÍAZ. Se les apercibe a los herederos antes mencionados que de no expresarse dentro de ese término de treinta (30) días en torno a la aceptación o repudiación de herencia, la misma se tendrá por aceptada. Los abogados de la parte demandante son: Lcdo. Andrés Sáez Marrero T.S.P.R. Núm. 18074 TROMBERG, MORRIS & PARTNERS, LLC 623 Ponce de León Avenue Executive Building, Ste. 1100A-2 San Juan, PR 00917 Tel. 877-338-4101 / Fax: 561-338-4077 prservice@tmppllc.com / asaez@tmppllc.com
Expido este edicto bajo mi firma y sello de este Tribunal, hoy 6 de mayo de 2025. GRISELDA RODRÍGUEZ COLLADO, SECRETARIA GENERAL. LUZ ENID FERNÁNDEZ DEL VALLE, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR. LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE ARECIBO SALA SUPERIOR DE CIALES BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO
Demandante V. LISANDRA I. MONTES SANTIAGO TCC LISANDRA MONTES SANTIAGO MONTES SANTIAGO Y OTROS
Demandado(a) Caso Núm.: MT2024CV00513. (Salón: 101 SALA SUPERIOR). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO Y OTROS. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. REGGIE DÍAZ HERNÁNDEZRDIAZ@BDPRLAW.COM.
A: ROLANDO WILLIAM RIVERA MONTES COMO MIEMBRO DE LISANDRA I. MONTES SANTIAGO T/C/C
LISANDRA MONTES
SANTIAGO, JOHN DOE Y RICHARD DOE COMO POSIBLES HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS DE LISANDRA I. MONTES
SANTIAGO T/C/C
LISANDRA MONTES SANTIAGO. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 08 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted
enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 08 de mayo de 2025. En Ciales, Puerto Rico, el 08 de mayo de 2025. VIVIAN Y. FRESSE GONZÁLEZ, SECRETARIA. BRUNILDA HERNÁNDEZ MÉNDEZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA SALA SUPERIOR DE COAMO BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO
Demandante V. SUCESIÓN DE REINALDO LUIS CORREA MORALES COMPUESTA POR LILIAM L. CORREA RODRIGUEZ, LUIS G. CORREA RODRIGUEZ, LILLIAM LUZ CORREA JUSTINIANO T/C/C
LILLIAM LUZ FLECHA, DOMINGO CORREA JUSTINIANO, BLANCA A. CORREA JUSTINIANO, WANDA L. CORREA RODRIGUEZ T/C/C WAND ORTIZ, CARMEN L. CORREA RODRIGUEZ, REINALDO JUNIOR CORREA ROMERO; SUCESIÓN DE MARGARITA ROMERO IRIZARRY T/C/C
MARGARITA CORREA COMPUESTA POR NORMA MARTINEZ CRUZ; REINALDO JUNIOR CORREA ROMERO; “JOHN DOE Y RICHARD ROE” COMO POSIBLES HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS DE LAS SUCESION DE MARGARITA ROMERO IRIZARRY T/C/C MARGARITA CORREA; CENTRO DE RECAUDACIONES DE INGRESOS MUNICIPALES (C.R.I.M.) – PARTE CON INTERÉS
Demandado
Civil Núm.: AI2023CV00512.
Sobre: EJECUCIÓN DE HIPOTECA - IN REM. ESTADOS
UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS, ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO, SS. AVISO DE SUBASTA. El que suscribe, Alguacil del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior, Centro Judicial de Coamo, Coamo, Puerto Rico, hago saber, a la parte demandada y al PÚBLICO EN GENERAL: Que en cumplimiento del Mandamiento de Ejecución de Sentencia expedido el día 14 de abril de 2025, por la Secretaría del Tribunal, procederé a vender y venderé en pública subasta y al mejor postor la propiedad que ubica y se describe a continuación: URBANA: Predio de terreno denominado como Solar O guion tres (3), en el plano de parcelación de la Urbanización Valle Arriba, sita en el Barrio San Ildefonso, del término municipal de Coamo, Puerto Rico, con una cabida superficial de cuatrocientos cuarenta y cinco punto noventa y cuatro metros cuadrados (445.94 m.c.), equivalentes a cero punto uno uno tres cinco (0.1135) de cuerda y en lindes por el NORTE, en treinta y tres punto cuarenta y siete (33.47) metros lineales con los Solares número cuatro (4) y seis (6); por el SUR, en treinta y cinco punto treinta (35.30) metros lineales con el Solar número uno (1); por el ESTE, en trece punto once (13.11) metros lineales con Judith del Valle; y por el OESTE, en trece punto cero cuatro (13.04) metros lineales con la Calle número treinta y siete (37) de la comunidad. Enclava en dicha propiedad una casa propia para vivienda de una planta construida totalmente en hormigón. Inscrita en la finca 13,761, al folio 278 del tomo 246 de Coamo, Registro de la Propiedad de Puerto Rico, Sección de Barranquitas. El producto de la subasta se destinará a satisfacer al demandante hasta donde alcance, la SENTENCIA dictada el 21 de febrero de 2025 y notificada en este caso el 25 de febrero de 2025 en el presente caso civil, a saber la suma $35,480.01 por concepto de principal; generando intereses a razón de 7.5% desde el 1 de abril de 2023; cargos por demora los cuales al igual que los intereses continúan acumulándose hasta el saldo total de la deuda reclamada en este pleito, y la suma de $7,930.00 para costas, gastos y honorarios de abogado; y demás créditos accesorios garantizados hipotecariamente. La adjudicación se hará al mejor postor, quien deberá consignar el importe de su oferta en el acto mismo de la adjudicación, en efectivo (moneda del curso legal de los Estados Unidos de América), giro postal o cheque certificado a nombre del alguacil del Tribunal. La PRIMERA SUBASTA se llevará a efecto el día 4 DE JU-
se llevará a efecto el día 10 DE JUNIO DE 2025 A LAS 9:00 DE LA MAÑANA, en la oficina antes mencionada del Alguacil que suscribe. El precio mínimo para la SEGUNDA SUBASTA será de $86,779.33, equivalentes a dos terceras (2/3) partes del tipo mínimo estipulado para la PRIMERA subasta. Que de ser necesaria la celebración de una TERCERA SUBASTA la misma se llevará a efecto el día 17 DE JUNIO DE 2025 A LAS 9:00 DE LA MAÑANA, en la oficina antes mencionada del Alguacil que suscribe. El precio mínimo para la TERCERA SUBASTA será de $65,084.50, equivalentes a la mitad (1/2) del tipo mínimo estipulado para la PRIMERA subasta. Si se declarase desierta la tercera subasta, se adjudicará la finca a favor del acreedor por la totalidad de la cantidad adeudada si ésta es igual o menor que el monto del tipo de la tercera subasta, si el Tribunal lo estima conveniente; se abonará dicho monto a la cantidad adeudada si esta es mayor, todo ello a tenor con lo dispone el Articulo 104 de la Ley Núm. 210 del 8 de diciembre de 2015 conocida como “Ley del Registro de la Propiedad Inmueble del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico”.
La propiedad a ser ejecutada se adquiere libre de toda carga y gravamen que afecte la mencionada finca según el Artículo 102, inciso 6. Una vez confirmada la venta judicial por el Honorable Tribunal, se procederá a otorgar la correspondiente escritura de venta judicial y se pondrá al comprador en posesión física del inmueble de conformidad con las disposiciones de Ley. Para conocimiento de la parte demandada y de toda aquella persona o personas que tengan interés inscrito con posterioridad a la inscripción del gravamen que se está ejecutando, y para conocimiento de todos los licitadores y el público en general, el presente Edicto se publicará por espacio de dos (2) semanas consecutivas, con un intervalo de por lo menos siete días entre ambas publicaciones, en un diario de circulación general en el Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico y se fijará además en tres (3) lugares públicos del Municipio en que ha de celebrarse dicha venta, tales como la Alcaldía, el Tribunal y la Colecturía. Se les informa, por último, que: a. Que los autos y todos los documentos correspondientes al procedimiento incoado estarán de manifiesto en la secretaría del tribunal durante las horas laborables. b. Que se entenderá que todo licitador acepta como bastante la titularidad y que las cargas y gravámenes anteriores y los preferentes, si los hubiere, al crédito del ejecutante continuarán subsistentes. Se entenderá, que el rematante los acepta y queda subrogado
en la responsabilidad de los mismos, sin destinarse a su extinción el precio del remate. EXPIDO, el presente EDICTO, en Carolina, Puerto Rico, hoy día 16 de abril de 2025. ALGUACIL MILDRED CASTRO, DIVISIÓN DE SUBASTAS, TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA, SALA SUPERIOR DE CAROLINA.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE SAN JUAN SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN JUAN
ROBERTO JESUS VELEZ RODRIGUEZ Y OTROS
Demandante V. ORIENTAL BANK Y OTROS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: SJ2025CV01225. (Salón: 901 CIVIL). Sobre: CANCELACIÓN O RESTITUCIÓN DE PAGARÉ EXTRAVIADO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. ZILMARIE DELGADO PIERASZILMARIED@HOTMAIL.COM. A: JUAN DEL PUEBLO Y JUANA DEL PUEBLO COMO POSIBLES TENEDORES Y CUALESQUIER PERSONA DESCONOCIDA CON POSIBLE INTERÉS EN LA OBLIGACIÓN CUYA CANCELACIÓN POR DECRETO JUDICIAL SE SOLICITA.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 07 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 08 de mayo de 2025. En San Juan, Puerto Rico, el 08 de mayo de 2025. GRISELDA RODRÍGUEZ COLLADO, SECRETARIA. MARÍA I. COLÓN RIVERA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO
DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE ARECIBO SALA SUPERIOR DE CAMUY BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO
Demandante V. MARCOS ANTONIO RUIZ GONZ?LEZ POR SI Y COMO REPRESENTANTE DE LA SOCIEDAD LEGAL DE GANANCIALES COMPUESTA CON FULANA DE TAL Y OTROS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: HA2024CV00307. (Salón: 102 CIVIL - CRIMINAL). Sobre: COBRO DE DINEROORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. GINA H. FERRER MEDINA - LAWOFFICES. GINAFERRERMEDINA@GMAIL. COM.
A: FULANA DE TAL POR SI Y EN REPRESENTACIÓN DE LA SOCIEDAD LEGAL DE GANANCIALES COMPUESTA POR ÉSTA Y MARCOS ANTONIO RUIZ GONZÁLEZ.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 05 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 08 de mayo de 2025. En Camuy, Puerto Rico, el 08 de mayo de 2025. VIVÍAN Y. FRESSE
GONZÁLEZ, SECRETARIA.
JOHANNA GONZÁLEZ VILELLA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE SAN JUAN SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN JUAN
DRIVEN P.S.C., EN SU CARÁCTER DE SÍNDICO DE NODUS
INTERNATIONAL BANK, INC.
Demandante V. BANCRECE CORP Y OTROS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: SJ2025CV00336. (Salón: 602). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO.
GABRIEL ANTONIO GARCÍA DELGADO - GGARCIA@ FERRAIUOLI.COM.
LUIS G. PARRILLA HERNANDEZLPARRILLA@FERRAIUOLI.COM. A: BANCRECE CORPMICHAEL GOGUIKIAN T/C/C MICHEL JEAN GOGUIKIAN.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 08 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 09 de mayo de 2025. En San Juan, Puerto Rico, el 09 de mayo de 2025. GRISELDA RODRÍGUEZ COLLADO, SECRETARIA. ELSA CANDELARIO CABRERA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE GUAYAMA SALA SUPERIOR DE SALINAS MARIBEL
SANTIAGO GONZALEZ
Demandante V. JOHN DOE Y RICHARD ROE COMO POSIBLES TENEDORES DESCONOCIDOS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: SA2024CV00315. (Salón: 202 SUPERIOR). Sobre: CANCELACIÓN O RESTITUCIÓN DE PAGARÉ EXTRAVIADO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO ENMENDADA. MARJALIISA COLÓN VILLANUEVAMCOLON@WWCLAW.COM. A: JOHN DOE Y
RICHARD ROE COMO POSIBLES TENEDORES DESCONOCIDOS. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 30 de enero de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 09 de mayo de 2025. Notas de la Secretaría: SE ENMIENDA LA NOTIFICACIÓN SEGÚN ORDENADO. En Salinas, Puerto Rico, el 09 de mayo de 2025. MARISOL ROSADO RODRÍGUEZ, SECRETARIA. ELIZABETH RIVERA RIVERA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE BAYAMÓN SALA SUPERIOR DE BAYAMÓN
ISLAND PORTFOLIO
SERVICES, LLC
COMO AGENTE DE FAIRWAY ACQUISITIONS FUND, LLC
Demandante V. MARLYNE RIVERA ALCARAZ
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: TA2024CV00691. (Salón: 500-A). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. OSVALDO L. RODRÍGUEZ FERNÁNDEZ - NOTIFICACIONES@ ORF-LAW.COM. A: MARLYNE RIVERA ALCARAZ.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 30 de abril DE 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una
sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 07 de mayo de 2025. En Bayamón, Puerto Rico, el 07 de mayo de 2025. ALICIA AYALA SANJURJO, SECRETARIA. MARÍA COLLAZO FEBUS, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE AGUADILLA SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN SEBASTIÁN ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC COMO AGENTE DE FAIRWAY ACQUISITIONS FUND, LLC
Demandante V. EUGENIO QUILES QUILES
Demandado(a) Caso Núm.: SS2024CV00629. (Salón: 0002 DISTRITO Y SUPERIOR). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. OSVALDO L. RODRÍGUEZ FERNÁNDEZ - NOTIFICACIONES@ ORF-LAW.COM. A: EUGENIO QUILES QUILES. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 05 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este
caso, con fecha de 07 de mayo de 2025. En San Sebastián, Puerto Rico, el 07 de mayo de 2025. SARAHÍ REYES PÉREZ, SECRETARIA. LAURA LUGO CRESPO, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE PONCE SALA SUPERIOR DE PONCE ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC COMO AGENTE DE FAIRWAY ACQUISITIONS FUND, LLC
Demandante V. RACHEL J. SMITH SEPULVEDA
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: PO2024CV02614. (Salón: 504 CRIMINAL Y TRÁNSITO). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. OSVALDO L. RODRÍGUEZ FERNÁNDEZ - NOTIFICACIONES@ ORF-LAW.COM.
A: RACHEL J. SMITH
SEPÚLVEDA - URB
CONSTANCIA 2624
BLVD LUIS A FERRE PONCE PR 00717 Y URB CONSTANCIA 2674 AVE LAS AMERICAS PONCE PR 00717. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 28 de abril de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 07 de mayo de 2025. En Ponce, Puerto Rico, el 07 de mayo de 2025. CARMEN G. TIRÚ QUIÑONES, SECRETARIA. KEILENE RODRÍGUEZ MELÉNDEZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBU-
NAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE CAROLINA SALA SUPERIOR DE CAROLINA ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC
COMO AGENTE DE FAIRWAY ACQUISITIONS FUND, LLC
Demandante V. EDGARDO JIMENEZ PACHECO Demandado(a) Caso Núm.: CA2024CV02921. (Civil: 406). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. NATALIE BONAPARTE SERVERANATALIE.BONAPARTE@ORF-LAW. COM.
A: EDGARDO JIMENEZ PACHECO. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 06 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 07 de mayo de 2025. En Carolina, Puerto Rico, el 07 de mayo de 2025. KANELLY ZAYAS ROBLES, SECRETARIA. MARICRUZ APONTE ALICEA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE BAYAMÓN SALA SUPERIOR DE BAYAMÓN ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC COMO AGENTE DE FAIRWAY ACQUISITIONS FUND, LLC Demandante V. NIDIA E. ARROYO VARGAS Demandado(a) Caso Núm.: BY2024CV02977. (Salón: 500-A). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. NATALIE BONAPARTE SERVERANATALIE.BONAPARTE@ORF-LAW.
COM.
A: NIDIA E. ARROYO VARGAS.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 30 de abril de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 07 de mayo de 2025. En Bayamón, Puerto Rico, el 07 de mayo de 2025. ALICIA AYALA SANJURJO, SECRETARIA. MARÍA COLLAZO FEBUS, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE BAYAMÓN SALA SUPERIOR DE BAYAMÓN ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC
COMO AGENTE DE FAIRWAY ACQUISITIONS FUND, LLC
Demandante V. YOHAM M. ANDINO TORRES
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: BY2024CV03581. (Salón: 500-A). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. NATALIE BONAPARTE SERVERANATALIE.BONAPARTE@ORF-LAW. COM.
A: YOHAM M. ANDINO TORRES. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 30 de abril de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notifica-
ción. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 07 de mayo de 2025. En Bayamón, Puerto Rico, el 07 de mayo de 2025. ALICIA AYALA SANJURJO, SECRETARIA. MARÍA COLLAZO FEBUS, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL. LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE HUMACAO SALA SUPERIOR DE LAS PIEDRAS ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC COMO AGENTE DE ACE ONE FUNDING, LLC
Demandante V. JOSE A. APONTE ROSADO
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: YB2024CV00204. (Salón: 103). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. NATALIE BONAPARTE SERVERANATALIE.BONAPARTE@ORF-LAW. COM. A: JOSE A. APONTE ROSADO - DIRECCION: HC 4 BOX 7084 YABUCOA, PR 00767. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto)
EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 31 de marzo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 08 de mayo de 2025. En Las Piedras, Puerto Rico, el 08 de mayo de 2025. EVELYN FÉLIX VÁZ-
QUEZ, SECRETARIA. LAURA DE JESÚS GONZÁLEZ, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA
CENTRO JUDICIAL DE BAYAMÓN SALA SUPERIOR DE BAYAMÓN ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC
COMO AGENTE DE FAIRWAY ACQUISITIONS FUND, LLC
Demandante V. WILMIN BAEZ TERRERO
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: BY2024CV04993.
(Salón: 500-A). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. NATALIE BONAPARTE SERVERANATALIE.BONAPARTE@ORF-LAW. COM.
A: WILMIN BAEZ TERRERO - URB VILLA CONTESSA P10 CALLE KENT, BAYAMON PR 00956; 110 MARCONI ST CLIFTON NJ 07013-2930.
(Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 08 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 08 de mayo de 2025. En Bayamón, Puerto Rico, el 08 de mayo de 2025. ALICIA AYALA SANJURJO, SECRETARIA. IXIA CÓRDOVA CHINEA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE BAYAMÓN SALA SUPERIOR DE BAYAMÓN ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC
COMO AGENTE DE FAIRWAY ACQUISITIONS
Demandante V. JHONIEL
ORENGO VAZQUEZ
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: BY2024CV02839. (Salón: 500-A). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. NATALIE BONAPARTE SERVERANATALIE.BONAPARTE@ORF-LAW. COM.
A: JHONIEL ORENGO VAZQUEZ - ESTANCIAS DEL PLATA E6 CALLE 4, TOA ALTA PR 00953. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 08 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 08 de mayo de 2025. En Bayamón, Puerto Rico, el 08 de mayo de 2025. ALICIA AYALA SANJURJO, SECRETARIA. IXIA CÓRDOVA CHINEA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL. LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE PONCE SALA SUPERIOR DE PEÑUELAS ISLAND PORTFOLIO SERVICES, LLC COMO AGENTE DE ACE ONE FUNDING, LLC
Demandante V. SAUL A. RODRIGUEZ FRATICELLI
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: PE2024CV00130. (Salón: 3 SALA MUNICIPAL EN SUPERIOR). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. OSVALDO L. RODRÍGUEZ FERNÁNDEZ - NOTIFICACIONES@ ORF-LAW.COM. A: SAÚL A. RODRÍGUEZ FRATICCELI. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que sus-
cribe le notifica a usted que el 06 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 08 de mayo de 2025. En Peñuelas, Puerto Rico, el 08 de mayo de 2025. CARMEN G. TIRÚ QUIÑONES, SECRETARIA.
MELISSA RIVERA ROMERO, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE ARECIBO SALA SUPERIOR DE ARECIBO
MARGARITA ABREU ÁVILA
Demandante V. JUAN RAMÓN ABREU DELGADO, MINERVA FIGUEROA GARCÍA Y LA SOCIEDAD LEGAL DE GANANCIALES COMPUESTA ENTRE AMBOS Y OTROS
Demandado(a) Caso Núm.: AR2025CV00083. (Salón: 402 - CIVIL SUPERIOR). Sobre: PROCEDIMIENTO ESPECIAL EXPEDITO DE EXPEDIENTE DE DOMINIO, REANUDACIÓN DE TRACTO Y USUCAPIÓN (LEY NÚM. 118-2022). NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. CAROLINA J. GARRIGA CESANI - CGARRIGA@ TITLESECURITYGROUP.COM. A: JUAN RAMÓN ABREU DELGADO, MINERVA FIGUEROA GARCÍA Y LA SOCIEDAD LEGAL DE GANANCIALES COMPUESTA ENTRE AMBOS; LUIS ABREU MALDONADO, COMO PERSONA CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE JUAN RAMÓN ABREU DELGADO; JOHN DOS Y JANE DOE COMO PERSONAS CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE LUIS
ABREU MALDONADO, AIDA MARGARITA ABREU DELGADO, COMO PERSONA CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE JUAN RAMÓN ABREU DELGADO, JOHN DOE Y JANE DOE COMO PERSONAS CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE AIDA MARGARITA ABREU DELGADO; ALICIA ABREU DELGADO, COMO PERSONA CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE JUAN RAMÓN ABREU
DELGADO; JOHN DOE Y JANE DOE COMO PERSONAS CON INTERÉS LA SUCESIÓN DE ALICIA ABREU
DELGADO; MINERVA MARGARITA ABREU
FIGUEROA, COMO PERSONA CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE JUAN RAMÓN ABREU
DELGADO Y EN LA SUCESIÓN DE MINERVA
FIGUEROA GARCÍA; JOHN DOE Y JANE
DOE COMO PERSONAS CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE MINERVA MARGARITA
ABREU FIGUEROA; JUAN RAMÓN ABREU
FIGUEROA, COMO PERSONA CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE JUAN RAMÓN ABREU
DELGADO Y EN LA SUCESIÓN MINERVA
FIGUEROA GARCÍA; JOHN DOE Y JANE DOE COMO PERSONAS CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE JUAN RAMÓN ABREU
FIGUEROA; JOHN DOE Y JANE DOE COMO PERSONAS CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE JUAN RAMÓN ABREU
DELGADO; JOHN DOE Y JANE DOE COMO PERSONAS CON INTERÉS EN LA SUCESIÓN DE MINERVA
FIGUEROA GARCÍA; JOHN DOE Y JANE DOE COMO PERSONAS DESCONOCIDAS QUE PUDIERAN TENER ALGÚN INTERÉS EN LA PROPIEDAD OBJETO DE ESTA DEMANDA. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 07 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de
los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 08 de mayo de 2025. En Arecibo, Puerto Rico, el 08 de mayo de 2025. VIVÍAN Y. FRESSE GONZÁLEZ, SECRETARIA. ALEXANDRA ÁLVAREZ NATAL, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE SAN JUAN SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN JUAN SUN WEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC.
Demandante V. JOHN DOE Y OTROS
Demandado(a)
Caso Núm.: SJ2024CV11112. (Salón: 905 CIVIL). Sobre: CANCELACIÓN O RESTITUCIÓN DE PAGARÉ EXTRAVIADO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. JOSE O. MERCADO GELYJMERCADO@COMASREVUELTA. COM.
A: JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 08 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 12 de
mayo de 2025. En San Juan, Puerto Rico, el 12 de mayo de 2025. GRISELDA RODRÍGUEZ COLLADO, SECRETARIA. MARIBEL RIVERA RIVERA, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
LEGAL NOTICE
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE PRIMERA INSTANCIA CENTRO JUDICIAL DE SAN JUAN SALA SUPERIOR DE SAN JUAN
HACIENDA DEL MAR OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC Demandante V. RAFAEL EDUARDO DE ROJAS BRITO Y OTROS Demandado(a) Caso Núm.: SJ2024CV05738. (Salón: 902 CIVIL). Sobre: COBRO DE DINERO - ORDINARIO. NOTIFICACIÓN DE SENTENCIA POR EDICTO. GETZEMARIE LUGO RODRÍGUEZGLUGO@MPMLAWPR.COM. LUIS C. MARINI BIAGGILMARINI@MPMLAWPR.COM. A: RAFAEL EDUARDO DE ROJAS BRITO Y LA SUCESIÓN DE SANDRA MARGARITA ROGER MARIÑO, COMPUESTA POR JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, FULANO (A) DE TAL, SUTANO (A) DE TAL Y JUAN DEL PUEBLO, COMO POSIBLES HEREDEROS DESCONOCIDOS. (Nombre de las partes que se le notifican la sentencia por edicto) EL SECRETARIO(A) que suscribe le notifica a usted que el 09 de mayo de 2025, este Tribunal ha dictado Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución en este caso, que ha sido debidamente registrada y archivada en autos donde podrá usted enterarse detalladamente de los términos de la misma. Esta notificación se publicará una sola vez en un periódico de circulación general en la Isla de Puerto Rico, dentro de los 10 días siguientes a su notificación. Y, siendo o representando usted una parte en el procedimiento sujeta a los términos de la Sentencia, Sentencia Parcial o Resolución, de la cual puede establecerse recurso de revisión o apelación dentro del término de 30 días contados a partir de la publicación por edicto de esta notificación, dirijo a usted esta notificación que se considerará hecha en la fecha de la publicación de este edicto. Copia de esta notificación ha sido archivada en los autos de este caso, con fecha de 12 de mayo de 2025. En San Juan, Puerto Rico, el 12 de mayo de 2025. GRISELDA RODRÍGUEZ COLLADO, SECRETARIA. LUCRECIA PAGÁN MORALES, SECRETARIA AUXILIAR DEL TRIBUNAL.
Fill in the empty fields with the numbers from 1 through 9.
Sudoku Rules:
Every row must contain the numbers from 1 through 9
Every column must contain the numbers from 1 through 9
Every 3x3 square must contain the numbers from 1 through 9
By KEN ROSENTHAL / THE ATHLETIC
The first question about Pete Rose’s reinstatement is obvious: Why did Rob Manfred, the commissioner of Major League Baseball, reverse course? Though Rose’s lawyer and oldest daughter surely made heartfelt pleas on behalf of Rose, the career hits leader, it is reasonable to wonder if pressure on Manfred from President Donald Trump had a greater impact.
If Trump did indeed help persuade the commissioner, it leads to another question: Can the president succeed in lobbying Rose into the Baseball Hall of Fame? Influencing the Hall’s committee process might be more challenging, but after Manfred’s stunning decision Tuesday to posthumously remove Rose, Shoeless Joe Jackson and others from MLB’s permanently ineligible list, who can say for sure?
Rose, who died last Sept. 30, wanted nothing more than to be enshrined in Cooperstown, but said on multiple occasions that it would never happen while he was alive. His former lawyer, Jeffrey Lenkov, and oldest daughter,
Fawn Rose, met with Manfred on Dec. 17 about taking the first step in that effort, and removing him from the ineligible list. Trump, who has been quite public in his support of Rose, met with Manfred at the White House on April 17. Manfred acknowledged Rose was a point of discussion.
The ban Rose accepted in 1989 for betting on baseball was a permanent one, not a lifetime one. Based on that language alone, Manfred could have reasonably justified extending the penalty into perpetuity. In 2022, after receiving a letter from Rose asking for forgiveness, Manfred told the Baseball Writers’ Association of America, “I believe that when you bet on baseball, from Major League Baseball’s perspective, you belong on the permanently ineligible list.”
But in a letter to Lenkov, who had petitioned Manfred for Rose’s reinstatement, the commissioner wrote Tuesday, “In my view, a determination must be made regarding how the phrase ‘permanently ineligible’ should be interpreted regarding Rule 21,” which addresses betting on baseball by people in the sport. “Obviously, a person no longer with us cannot represent a
threat to the integrity of the game.”
Did Rose’s death soften Manfred? Was the case presented to the commissioner by Rose’s lawyer and daughter singularly moving? Doubtful on both counts, considering Manfred’s resistance to reinstating Rose in the past. Only after Trump entered the picture did the commissioner do an about-face.
Manfred is nothing if not shrewd. He surely did not want to risk the president embarrassing him publicly on social media. He also probably did not want to get on Trump’s wrong side at a time when he is pushing for a direct-to-consumer streaming service for the league and the migration from broadcast to streaming by professional sports leagues is under government scrutiny. Also, while Trump is known to be pro-management, it is not out of the realm of possibility that, if sufficiently annoyed, he could threaten baseball’s antitrust exemption.
Reinstating Rose, at least in a narrow, shortterm view, comes at little cost. The Hall of Fame is the true prize for Rose’s supporters. And while Manfred sits on the Hall’s board, he can safely distance himself from whatever decision the Hall makes on Rose’s fate. As the commissioner wrote in his letter to Lenkov, “I want to emphasize that it is not part of my authority or responsibility to express any view concerning Mr. Rose’s consideration by or possible election to the Hall of Fame.”
The writers’ association never got the chance to vote on Rose. Under a rule adopted by the Hall’s board in 1991 — 1 1/2 years after Rose agreed to his ban, and the same year he would have been on the writers’ ballot for the first time — a player on the ineligible list cannot be considered for election to the Hall. Rose’s removal from that list changes nothing for the writers; his eligibility for our ballot has expired.
Now that Rose is reinstated, the way for him to gain induction is by passing muster with two Hall committees. The first is a BBWAA-appointed and board-approved Historical Overview Committee, a group that conducts an initial screening process and seemingly would rubber-stamp Rose’s candidacy to allow him a full hearing. The second is a 16-member era committee made up of Hall of Famers, executives and veteran media members.
The era committees work on three-year rotations. Without directly referring to Rose and Jackson, the Hall’s chair, Jane Forbes Clark, said in a statement that players removed from the permanently ineligible list would be classified in the Classic Baseball Era, which covers players who made their greatest impact before 1980. Thus, Rose and Jackson will be eligible for election in the winter of 2027, as part of the class of 2028.
Each of the eight candidates on an era committee ballot must receive 75% approval. Rose, then, would need 12 voters willing to overlook his past indiscretions, including his alleged sexual relationship with a girl under 16 in the 1970s (which he has denied, acknowledging the relationship but saying she was 16 at the time); his five-month prison sentence for tax evasion in 1990; and, of course, his betting on baseball.
The committee presumably would weigh not just Rose’s 4,256 hits but also the implications of electing him, the message it would send, the precedent it would set. Manfred’s decision on Rose, Jackson and other members of the 1919 Black Sox might have almost immediate ramifications. The possibility of a current player betting on baseball is hardly far-fetched. It is not all that difficult to imagine Trump calling out individual committee members, whose identities are revealed a few days before the committee meets. The president has said he would pardon Rose. But the tax evasion conviction is the only one of Rose’s issues Trump could forgive. And that is not what kept Rose out of Cooperstown, where Trump clearly feels he belongs.
Commenting on his social media platform, Truth Social, after Rose’s death, Trump described Rose, a 17-time All-Star, as “one of the most magnificent players ever to play the game.” The president added: “He paid the price! Major League Baseball should have allowed him into the Hall of Fame many years ago.”
If he were elected, Rose’s contributions to the game would finally be recognized. His family and friends would celebrate an honor they consider long overdue. And the Hall, it can be argued, would become more complete.
Our society frequently is willing to forgive misconduct by famous figures. Prominent politicians, sports and entertainment figures routinely are afforded second acts. Rose for years argued he deserved the same.
May 16-18, 2025 23
Answers to the Sudoku and Crossword on page 21