TUESDAY
SKITS
THURSDAY
Tuesday, November 6, 2018
P2
Peer Theatre involves students in theater, looks to educate and inform with skits.
FAN LOYALTY
STREAMING
P3
P4
Ohio State student makes livestream gaming a full-time job.
Buckeye Rewards is a loyalty program that rewards committed fans.
FOOTBALL
THE LANTERN thelantern.com
@TheLantern
TUESDAY NOV. 6
P8
Ohio State’s running game will be tested by MSU’s rush defense.
The student voice of the Ohio State University
Year 138, Issue No. 48
Strauss accusers hope to speak at Board of Trustees’ meeting EDWARD SUTELAN Editor-in-Chief sutelan.1@osu.edu
ELECTION DAY 2018 LANTERN FILE PHOTO
CASEY CASCALDO | PHOTO EDITOR
COURTESY OF TNS
COURTESY OF TNS
Opposing Opinions: Issue 1 VOTE YES
VOTE NO ZACH VARDA Campus Editor varda.6@osu.edu Issue 1 has been fostering much discussion in the lead-up to the midterm elections, and no doubt if you are even remotely plugged in to Ohio elections, you have heard about it from one or both sides. First and foremost, there is no doubt in my mind that Issue 1 and those supporting it are extremely well-intentioned. My voice is one that I have learned a lot of people do not expect to be against Issue 1. As a recovering heroin addict, clean for four and a half years now, I would urge you to vote no, and I feel strongly enough about this to let go of my objectivity as an editor to write an opinion piece to voice this feeling. Ultimately, there are two reasons why you should vote no on Issue 1: A constitutional amendment is too drastic and if passed, valuable opportunities for addicts to get a catalyst for turning their life around will be taken away. As I am not a legal scholar, I will get the constitutional portion out of the way quickly. Simply put, constitutional amendments are a drastic measure and extremely difficult to tweak in the future. If this proposal is not nearly perfect but still passes, then we will be nearly powerless to make fixes. A lot of the ideas being proposed are good, but being taken a little
When people overdose, we see them as victims. When they are arrested in Ohio with low-level, non-violent drug possession, we see them as criminals. We can do better. As a primary care physician, I support Issue 1 because it halts the cycle of trauma and incarceration that often leads to drug use in the first place while also providing greater access to rehabilitation. My patients who have chronic diseases such as diabetes and depression have better results when we address all the factors that impact their health. If we know this approach works for chronic diseases, why don’t we treat the chronic disease of addiction with the same comprehensive approach? Instead, Ohio criminalizes and stigmatizes this chronic health condition – treating a public health issue with criminal justice interventions. The right path is to provide comprehensive, community-based medical care to people living with substance abuse that integrates rehabilitation, preventative care and chronic disease management, including addressing the high prevalence of complex psychiatric issues this population faces. Burdening the prison health system with people who should be effectively treated in the community is not the answer. Let’s treat these people with dignity and compassion, not incarcerate them. That’s why I support Issue 1.
VOTE NO CONTINUES ON 3
Fill out a quick
Martin Fried, M.D. Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
5 minute survey
Scan the QR code below or enter the link to begin!
for The Lantern and be entered to win a
$50 Visa Gift Card!
http://bit.ly/2PksndU
Several people accusing Dr. Richard Strauss of sexual abuse during his time at Ohio State are hoping to speak at the full Board of Trustees’ meeting on Nov. 16, said Judy Peterson, a spokeswoman at EJV Communications, the firm handling public relations for several accusers. The group does not know if it will be allowed to speak to the Board yet and is currently working to make a formal request, but hopes to have four publicly identified victims speak at the meeting, Peterson said. Brian Garrett, who said he was abused by Strauss at a private clinic in 1996, said he has not spoken with Ohio State since making his accusations public and was interviewed only once in June by Perkins Coie, the Seattle-based law firm handling the investigation. He would be one of the first to speak to the Board if the accusers are allowed the opportunity to speak. “[Ohio State has] not done one ounce of anything to reach out to the victims to be useful or helpful. Zero. Nada. Nothing,” Garrett said, adding that everything he’s learned about progress in the investigation has come through the media. “That’s why it’s kind of disappointing. And the lawyers have offered to mediate and sit down with them several times to talk and they’ve denied them all,” he said. Ohio State spokesman Chris Davey said the university has not received a formal request to speak at the Board Meeting, but “the university will work with victims to ensure that at the appropriate time and place they have the opportunity to be heard.” Peterson said in a press release that Ohio State held a closedSTRAUSS CONTINUES ON 2