Wednesday October 24, 2012 year: 132 No. 121
the student voice of
The Ohio State University
www.thelantern.com
thelantern
Verizon to improve game day cell service
sports
KAYLA BYLER Lantern reporter byler.18@osu.edu
8A
A duel with the Ducks
The OSU football team scheduled two future games against Oregon.
[ a+e ]
On Buckeye game days, it’s nearly impossible to get cellphone service. Ohio State, partnered with Verizon Wireless, is working on a three-phase, three-year project to alleviate problems with service outages. Kelly Garrett, assistant professor of communication said the increased number of people on campus is the main source of problems with cellphone service on football game days. Record attendance at Ohio Stadium is more than 106,000, which exceeds the normal 80,000 OSU students and employees on campus any given day. “It is not uncommon for the cellphone companies to have too few channels to support all those people,” Garrett said. Verizon and OSU are working to develop a “Neutral Host Wireless Distribution System (WDS) solution to ensure that campus cellular capacity and coverage will meet the ever-growing demand for mobile connectivity,” according to a release from the Office of the Chief Information Officer. Verizon will pay all costs related to the project, said Kathy Starkoff, chief information officer at OSU. After working with different specialists across campus, the university sought out numerous service providers and “Verizon was the winning bid,” Starkoff said. Once completed, Verizon “will sublease capacity to other vendors,” Starkoff said, so users of all cellphone providers will benefit from the project.
ANDREW HOLLERAN / Photo editor
The OSU defense lines up against the Purdue offense during the Oct. 20 game. OSU won 29-22 in overtime. There were 105,290 people in attendance. Construction on the project is expected to be discrete. There will not be a “giant tower,” Starkoff said. “It really is a number of devices that will be placed around campus depending on the expected capacity needs, and we will work closely with the facility organizations to make sure that the systems are discrete … If you’re lucky you’ll never see it, but we know they’re there.” The OCIO saw service outages as a problem and understood the urgency in solving it, Starkoff said. “We like to proactively manage all of our systems and networks, and we understand that at peak times
the coverage was not what it should be,” Starkoff said. The three-phase, three-year project is on time for completion in 2015, Starkoff said. Phase one is scheduled to be included in June 2013. This phase will target service in and around the Wexner Medical Center, Police Command Center at Ohio Stadium, OSU Police Headquarters, William Oxley Thompson Memorial Library, Ohio Union and Blackwell Inn. “In addition to supporting the cellular services,
continued as Cell on 3A
Not all universities oppose concealed carry
Horror hot spots
4A
Check out popular spooky destinations near OSU’s campus.
campus
Ohio State President E. Gordon Gee doesn’t approve of guns on campus, and he’s made it clear he won’t be changing his mind. “Not as long as I’m president. I am totally, unequivocally opposed,” said Gee in a Sept. 10 interview with The Lantern. “I want to be very clear about that. I think that is a horrible idea on a university campus for people to be carrying guns. Period.” According to the National Conference of State Legislatures website, Ohio is one of 21 states that bans carrying a concealed weapon on any college campus. OSU currently has a policy that prohibits individuals from carrying guns on campus, a prohibition one student group thinks violates Second Amendment rights and plans to fight the university with a lawsuit on the issue. In an email to The Lantern, OSU Police Chief Paul Denton stressed the police’s respect for
CHRISTOPHER BRAUN / Design editor
MICHAEL BURWELL Lantern reporter burwell.37@osu.edu
constitutional rights but also highlighted the reason behind the campus rule. “The fact is that under current Ohio law, concealed carry license holders are limited or prohibited from carrying concealed handguns in numerous locations, among which are churches,
synagogues, mosques, child day care centers, buildings owned or leased by Ohio or its political subdivisions, colleges and universities,” Denton said in the email. Gee’s firm stance on the issue is reflected by some other Ohio universities and their own policies. “Knowing that one can make very persuasive arguments on both sides of the guns on campus issue, my stance is consistent with President Gee in that I feel the campus is a safer place with restrictions on guns on campus in place,” said Director and Chief of Police of the University of Toledo police department Jeff Newton in an email. Newton said he isn’t concerned that citizens who qualify for carrying a concealed weapon pose a threat, but he’s worried about gun security overall. “Theft is the most pervasive crime on campus and the density of people in a campus environment and residence halls make combating theft uniquely
continued as Concealed on 2A
Half-semester class problems Case could alter affirmative action’s future
2A
Get the daily email edition!
www.thelantern.com/email
weather high 80 low 55 partly cloudy
TH F SA SU
81/57
sunny
65/45
partly cloudy
50/39
showers
50/35
sunny www.weather.com
BRANDON KLEIN Lantern reporter klein.340@osu.edu It all started with a simple college application. How colleges evaluate applicants and race at public universities like Ohio State could be changing with an upcoming Supreme Court decision. Abigail Fisher, a white student who wanted to attend a Texas university in 2008, brought the case to the court’s attention. Fisher did not qualify for the “Top 10 percent” law that the Texas legislature had passed in 1997 which automatically accepts the top students in every Texas high school to any Texas state university, regardless of race. Fisher went through the regular admission process but when she was denied entrance, she sued the school claiming that Texas’ use of race did not meet the standards set by the Supreme Court’s ruling in the 2003 case Grutter v. Bollinger, which debated whether race could be used in the admission process for the University of Michigan’s law school. It was decided in a 5-to-4 opinion that race could be used in the admissions process so universities and colleges could ensure a diverse student body. However, institutions were prohibited from using race quotas. Things could change for future student applicants in the admission process if the Supreme Court rules in favor of Fisher. The decision to prohibit racial considerations in college admissions would have an impact for OSU’s admission process, said Vern Granger the OSU associate vice president of enrollment services and director of admissions. “It’s a hot topic among universities like us,” he said. “Ohio State (is) looking at monitoring the case closely.” If the court prohibits the use of race in the admission process, it would be “tougher to say how much so,” Granger said, adding that race is not “exclusively used” but is a secondary factor in the review process. The most important factor, Granger said, is that the university focuses on is the student’s “academic capability to be successful at Ohio State.”
Some students are in favor of the court to prevent race as a consideration in the admission process. “People go to college to further their education so that’s what should be focused on,” said Chrislyn Koch, a first-year in exploration. Koch said that certain traits such as sex, gender and race should not be considered in the admissions process. A panel of professors and legal experts discussed the issues surrounding the latest affirmative action Supreme Court case, Fisher v. University of Texas on Tuesday at OSU. The panel, which met at the Moritz College of Law, examined some of the likely outcomes as well as the future of affirmative action. Sharon Davies, the executive director of the Kirwan Institute, moderated the discussion. “The population is shifting,” said Angel Harris, a Princeton University professor, at the panel. She said that by 2050 the minorities would become the majority, which would have an impact on the educated population. So far in 2012, minority births in the U.S. exceeded births of white children. The case is an attempt to “write race out of the law,” said Damon Hewitt, director of education practice for NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. He said there are “significant racial disparities” that cannot be ignored for this to happen. Other than overruling the Grutter decision, the Supreme Court would have to either uphold the decision, or narrow it to private and law schools, said Phillip Daniel, the OSU law professor who was on the panel. Some students think diversity is an important characteristic to the student body at OSU. Among them is Chizo Emeaghara, a third-year in exercise science. As an African-American, Emeaghara said he attended a predominantly white high school. “It’s nice to see another black face,” he said smiling. “It’s always nice to have diversity at your school.” Emeaghara said diversity is important for the school’s student body, but should not be an exclusive factor in the admission process. “You still need to work hard,” he said. Of the almost 57,000 OSU students who
Courtesy of MCT
Students show their support for affirmative action in Berkeley, Calif., Sept. 27, 2011. attend the Columbus campus, 8,187 minorities make up 14.4 percent of the campus population, according to a university website. The court’s decision is expected to come in late June. “It’s going to impact a lot of universities like us,” Granger said of OSU.
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
www.thelantern.com 1A