Page 1
Volume CXIX, No. 9
National Betsy DeVos was confirmed by the Senate to serve in President Trump’s Cabinet as the Secretary of Education. DeVos faced fierce opposition due to her lack of experience in public education and her support of school vouchers. After 24 consecutive hours of speeches aimed at getting a third republican defector, all 48 members of the Democratic Caucus and two moderate republicans, Senator Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska voted against DeVos. This 50-50 split resulted in the first time a vice-president was needed to cast the tiebreaking vote on a cabinet nomination. During her confirmation process, she repsonded to a question about bullying experienced by students of the LGBT community: “Every child deserves to attend school in a safe, supportive environment where they can learn, thrive and grow.” This resonated better with her oposition than her comments on guns in Wyoming schools: “I will refer back to Sen. Enzi and the school he was talking about in Wyoming. I think probably there, I would imagine that there is probably a gun in the school to protect from potential grizzlies.”
International Alexei Navalny, leader of an anticorruption campaign in Russia, was found guilty of embezzlement and was given a five-year suspended sentence along with a 500,000-rouble ($8,500; £6,700) fine. This court decision comes from a retrial precipitated by a European Court of Human Rights ruling which deemed the original trial to be unfair. All of this comes after Navalny targeted senior officials in an anticorruption campaign. Navalny denies the charges and promises to continue his bid for the presidency despite being barred from the race due to his recent conviction. President Putin has not yet declared his intention to run again in 2018.
This week’s “Top Stories” were compiled by Joshua Wagner and Morgan Hubbard with information from abcnews.go.com and the BBC.
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Thursday, February 9, 2017
FREE
Department of Justice grant expands efforts against sexual violence on campus B y S arah K irkpatrick S taff W riter After receiving a 25 million dollar grant from the Department of Justice Office on Violence Against Women, Gettysburg College has undertaken a massive project to prevent sexual and domestic violence on campus as well to provide assistance to survivors of these crimes. One of College’s first steps in the initiative was hiring Grant Project Coordinator Valentina Cucuzza, a welcome addition to the Gettysburg community. “My primary role is to lead all communication and coordination for on- and off-campus victims’ resources,” explains Cucuzza, “My job is to ensure that information flows freely among all offices and that efforts are not being duplicated amongst our many dedicated on-campus partners in violence prevention.” This team of dedicated partners includes groups like Survivors, Inc., the Gettysburg Borough Police Department, and the District Attorney’s Office, but continues to add new members. As Grant Project Coordinator, Cucuzza argues that one of her main priorities is the creation of a Campus Coordinated Community Response Team (CCRT), a “multidisciplinary team of campus and community partners that meet regularly to assess, plan, monitor, and evaluate campus prevention and response efforts.” The team plans to use the groundwork established by the Sexual Violence and Healthy
Photo credit Gettysburg College Communications and Marketing
Relationships Committee (SVHR), which existed before the College received the DOJ grant, as the foundation for their group. They also look forward to working with new partners such as a SAFE nurse from the Gettysburg Hospital, the Adams County Assistant District Attorney, local law enforcement, and Ms. Jessica Ritter, a recently hired Victims’ Services Advocate from Survivors, Inc. As a new member of the Gettysburg staff, Ritter will also play an important role in providing on-campus confidential resources for students who have been the victim of sexual assault or domestic violence. Ritter is qualified to offer crisis counseling as well as medical and legal advocacy to survivors who seek her assistance in the healing process. Armed with skilled new members and ample funding, Cucuzza explains that the Grant Project team hopes to
“enhance victim services, implement prevention and education programs, and develop and strengthen security and investigation strategies to prevent prosecute and respond to domestic violence” as well as related crimes such as dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. The College plans to achieve these goals through a carefully designed threeyear plan, which begins with a focus on planning and training the team responsible for executing the initiative. In the year two, the Grant Project will execute strategic plans on campus, which include establishing new prevention programs designed to assist underserved or highrisk student populations such as LGBTQIA, minority groups, and students involved in Greek Organizations. By the third year of the program, the College plans to shift its focus to employing training programs, such as Green Dot Bystander training,
that will help to continue on the project’s legacy even after its conclusion. “My goal is to have all students be aware and comfortable utilizing all of the resources available to them should they ever experience sexual assault or domestic violence during their time here at Gettysburg College,” Cucuzza explains, “We want students to feel supporting and know that Gettysburg College is really committed to preventing violence in our community.” Along with the rest of the Grant Project team, Cucuzza hopes to expand on existing violence prevention programs, establish new, more inclusive prevention service, and reduce victimization on campus. She urges students to contact her if they are interested in developing a new program or training for a specific student organization or to reach out to Ms. Ritter if they require confidential resources. Many Gettysburg
students show enthusiasm for the Grant Project, hoping that it will help to transform our campus culture and reduce the prevalence of crimes such as sexual assault. “I think the grant will give the college more resources to better educate our community and put sexual assault and domestic violence prevention methods into practice,” asserts First Year Sammi Singman. Jackson Guyton, a First Year and Green Dot Program participant, echoes similar optimism for the plan. “I think the grant should be used to inform campus community members about ways to reduce the risk of sexual assault,” explains Guyton, “I anticipate that it will help Gettysburg students to be more excellent to each other.” Time will only tell whether this age-old vision will become a reality, but with new funding and plans to improve life on Gettysburg’s campus, the future looks hopeful.
Melon grant allocated to Gettysburtg College to support diversity-related efforts on campus B y B enjamin P ontz S taff W riter Gettysburg College announced last week that it has received an $800,000 grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation to support diversity-related efforts on campus. The grant stems from the college’s strategic plan, a need to foster inclusion and internationalization, and it will provide funds for the hiring of six new tenure-track faculty members who “possess the experience, knowledge and skills to support underrepresented students,” according to a release from the college’s communications department. The release goes on to explain, “In
Inside This Issue
This Week’s Top Stories
♦
their first year, these ‘Mellon Faculty Fellows’ will receive additional support as they adjust to living and working in the community, including the opportunity to teach a reduced course load and receive additional mentoring and training. A new Inclusion Partner Program will also provide faculty with training to implement inclusive hiring practices and engage in ongoing diversity recruitment practices.” In addition to hiring new faculty members, the grant will support efforts to revise departmental learning outcomes to emphasize and enhance diversityrelated components as well as to develop new
Trump’s Executive Mellon Scholar Order reflection, affects pg. 3 faculty, pg. 2
courses that represent different perspectives than those currently a part of the curriculum. Although the primary focus of these curriculum modifications may come in the humanities, Associate Professor of Mathematics Darren Glass sees an opportunity for growth even in a department such as his. “Having a diverse faculty across the curriculum is important for a number of reasons, but in my eyes the biggest one is the ways that it can help us diversify the students studying a given discipline and, ultimately, working in a given discipline,” he explains. “Traditionally, the sciences have been
dominated by white men, m u ch to ou r detriment as a community, and everyone will be better off if we find ways to nurture talent no matter where it is coming from … If we want to diversify the kinds of students that study, for example, Mathematics then it is important to give rolemodels that show that anyone can thrive in the sciences.” A s t h e coordinator for the firstyear seminar program, Glass is also eager for faculty with new and diverse perspectives to engage incoming students of all backgrounds from their first day on campus. “We have some seminars that deal directly with ‘diversity
Scientists New create Schmucker human-pig Gallery hybrid. Exhibition, pg. 5 pg. 6
issues,’ but we could always use more, and more importantly I think there are lots of other topics that would resonate with a student body that is increasingly diverse which this new cohort of faculty might be able to help with,” says Glass. “I am hopeful that this grant will help us to be able to recruit a more diverse group of faculty and just as importantly, help them to thrive at the college and want to spend their careers here.” According to the Mellon Foundation, this is the 14th (and largest) grant they have awarded Gettysburg College since 1975. Collectively, those grants amount to more than $4 million.
Opinions, please! pg. 7
Women’s Swimming finishes strong, pg. 8
THE GETTYSBURGIAN
Page 2
NEWS ♦
Thursday, February 9, 2017
President Trump’s executive Baby food shown to affect and society in special lecture order may affect faculty travel Breflect C W c h i l d a n d t h a t f e e d i n g fats and sugar, was not
B y B enjamin P ontz S taff W riter On the heels of sending an email to discuss the potential impacts of ending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, Gettysburg President Janet Morgan Riggs again sent an email to the campus community regarding an immigration-related issue. This time, the message discussed President Donald Trump’s recent executive order banning admittance from seven countries that have Muslim majorities: Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Iran, Somalia, Libya and Yemen. Trump argues that these countries are “terror hotspots” and thus pose a threat to the U.S. Riggs noted that although the college presently does not have any students or faculty who hail from such
countries, faculty travel could be affected along with certain students’ family members. She promised support from college administration for anyone wishing to discuss the executive order’s implications further, and she closed by urging all members of the campus community to uphold values “rooted in the worth and dignity of all people— regardless of their religion or country of origin.” Trump’s executive order has caused controversy for its ban on refugees as well as for seeming to uphold a campaign promise to ban Muslim immigration, a perception that was fueled by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani (now an advisor to Trump) telling FOX News, “I’ll tell you the whole history of it: When he first announced it, he said ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me
up, he said, ‘Put a commission together, show me the right way to do it legally.’” Around the country, masses protested at various airports, and to date, several federal judges have stayed parts of the ban. Most recently, a federal judge in Seattle issued a nationwide stay on the ban, something Trump promptly denounced as “ridiculous.” “The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes lawenforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!” he tweeted on Saturday. Nevertheless, the Department of Homeland Security has stopped enforcing the order, and a protracted legal battle is almost certainly imminent.
Student Senate Bullet Points February 6, 2017 * President Riggs spoke to the Student Senate about campus renovations and the impact of recent political events on student life * Tom Segerstrom was appointed as Class of 2017 Senator * Mike Mancino was appointed as Class of 2018 Senator * Nick Arbaugh was appointed as Class of 2020 Senator * Claire Quinn was appointed as Co-Chair of Public Relations * Alex Xie was appointed as Co-Chair of the College Life Advisory Committee * $1,348.09 was allotted to Circolo Italiano * $1,250.00 was allotted to Jazz Appreciation Society
y
harlie
illiamson
W riter On Friday, February 3rd in Masters Hall 110, Professor Amy Bentley spoke about how the invention of commercial baby food has shaped American notions of infancy and influenced what we eat as a society. Bentley gave a timeline of how what we feed our children has developed over the last couple centuries, from the conventional wisdom of the 1800’s to the more science driven approach of the present day. Up until the mid to 19th century, little was known about what to feed your baby. This time period was one before the discovery of germs and good nutritional practice. Many believed that infants had to be breast fed the first year of their life and that solid foods like fruits and vegetables were ‘cold and dangerous’ as opposed to meat and grains that were seen to make a child strong. The limited knowledge set the stage for the first baby food producers. In the 1920’s, companies like Gerber marketed the idea that solid food was okay for babies to eat. The advertisement campaigns spurred themselves on the idea that you had to be a good mother to your contributing
them baby food was the responsible thing to do. These campaigns proved wildly successful as baby food became the landscape of grocery stores in the 1930’s. Baby food became extremely accessible, which made it a typical household item throughout WWII. By the end of WWII, and on the onset of the baby-boom generation, baby food had become the most highly purchased product in grocery stores. It also marked the disappearance of breast feeding. Bentley claims that the spoon used in baby food ads was important as “it was a marker of civilization…that we are a wealthy, civilized country contrasted with the primitive groups that breast feed their children.” Bentley also added that baby food producers captured the high morale and arrogance of the post war period, which created this idea that “we can create food through science better than nature can.” By the 1960’s, 90% of babies ate baby food and two-thirds were fed Gerber. However, in the 1960’s and 70’s, scientific research started to develop and people found out that baby food, which had high amounts of artificial
healthy for a baby. As a result, breastfeeding started to come back, and cook books were created so moms could cook natural, healthy food for their children. This scientific research put pressure on baby food producers, who responded with organic baby food and no more baby food desserts. From the 1970’s on, there has been a constant struggle between the false advertising of the nutritional benefits of baby food and real science. Today, companies like Gerber and their fat and sugar filled baby food are still successful even though the science is clear that Americans have too much of those in our diets. Bentley admitted that even she fed baby food to two of her three kids because of how e as i ly a cc e s s i b l e it i s . At the end of the talk, an elder man who was a food packer for fifty years praised Bentley for her talk, “It was interesting because baby food and its highly industrialized and unhealthy ways is a . microcosm for what is happening with all foods. The science is there, but people are lazy and will choose the easy way out, even if it means they are eating unhealthy foods.”
Gettysburg professors reflect on the return to dystopian classics B y D aniella S nyder S taff W riter Coinciding with the presidential inauguration and recent executive orders, Americans have turned to novels they might have read in high school: dystopian novels like 1984 and Animal Farm. Current political events have sparked a spike in sales, news outlets like CNN and The New York Times report. At the Women’s March three weeks ago, references were made to Margaret Atwood’s A Handmaid’s Tale, a novel published thirtytwo years ago depicting a society in which women are stripped of civil rights. Posters proclaiming “Make Margaret Atwood
Fiction Again!” attracted attention, according to The New York Times. Publishers were left unprepared for the high demand. Some editions of these futile fictions remain sold out on the websites of Barnes & Noble and Amazon. S e v e r a l Gettysburg College English professors offered thoughts on why readers are choosing A Handmaid’s Tale instead of Pride & Prejudice. It makes sense why interest in 1984 rose following the controversy surrounding the comment Kellyanne Conway made regarding Sean Spicer’s “alternative facts”, according to professors Christopher Fee and
Leonard Goldberg. In 1984 “alternative facts” were simply considered “Newspeak”, a political weapon in which those in power use language to define the reality for the rest of society. L e o n a r d Goldberg, Gettysburg College English professor, said the idea of “Newspeak” is 1984’s most important theme. “While falseness in language is scarcely a new political phenomenon, it is important for modern readers to ask whether ‘alternative facts’ and ‘The Bowling Green Massacre’ might not have been foreseen in it,” he said. P r o f e s s o r Christopher Fee shared a similar sentiment: “Each
novel represents a special set of anxieties…Orwell, of course, takes as his central topic life in a totalitarian state with the p ow er t o con t ro l m or e than people’s minds, actions, and feelings. He is talking about concrete modes and methods of what we might term ‘deep propaganda,’ ways of controlling not just the news organizations and the history books but our very ways of formulating truth and morality.” It is terrifying because it is EXACTLY the depths to which totalitarian regimes really aspire, and even seeing slight references is enough to set off alarm bells for anyone concerned about free speech, due process, and the rule of law,” Fee
DPS Crime Log Nothing to report
January 29-31
February 1 Possession of Drug Paraphernalia: campus exterior: outside Burglary: Laptop theft - Rice Hall February 2 Arson: disclosed willful and intential burning of a pizza box - Hanson Hall February 3 Assisting other Agencies: false identification cards - Mamma Ventura Restaurant Burglary: Laptop theft - Rice Hall February 3 Liquor Laws: underage consumption/possession - Patrick Hall Liquor Laws: underage consumption/possession - Patrick Hall February 4 Liquor Laws: underage consumption - Rice Hall Sex Offence/Liquor Laws: Fondling, underage consumption - campus residence facility Liquor Laws: underage consumption - Alpha Tau Omega February 5 Liquor Laws: underage consumption - Smyser Hall Liquor Laws: underage consumption - Huber Hall
Photo credit: libstack.com
remarked. Professor Sarah Sillin uses The Hunger Games in her introductory English classes, and she commented that her class discussions on the novel have become political and involved with current events, as students begin to see parallels and connections to dystopian fiction and class conflict in America. While Professor Elizabeth Duquette plans to teach an entire first year seminar on dystopian literature this coming fall, Professor Temma Berg argues that everything she teaches has become political, even if the class discussion focuses on Hamlet.
However, while Orwell scholars for The New York Times claimed that dystopian literature is gaining popularity as a means to grapple with a new reality we, as Americans, have never faced, Berg remarks, “I can’t really remember a time that was not turbulent. We always read dystopian literature.” She continued: “Dystopian literature is there to raise awareness and warn us as readers for what could happen, but it also serves as a comfort to remind readers that things could be much worse. It is a false comfort, however, and we must consider how bad things could actually become.”
No news is bad news! Write for the News section. If you want to start or already have a piece you want printed, email the News editor: Joshua Wagner (wagnjo08).
THE GETTYSBURGIAN
FEATURES Page 3
♦
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Cutting or bulking for the “skinny fat” body type?
To read or not to read... that is the question
Photo credit Arne Hendriks
Reading the news, in light of recent feelings Explaining what it is and how they should eat A ri S naevarsson F eatures E ditor
by
Likely the most common dilemma anyone interested in changing their body composition arrives at is whether they should cut or bulk. Briefly, to “cut” means to lose weight (preferably fat mass), while “bulking” denotes an attempt to increase weight (preferably muscle mass) via a caloric surplus. Of course, answering this question is ultimately a personal decision; people at this crossroads should ask themselves what body composition they look or perform best at; whether the necessary dietary/physical regimen intervention to get to that end goal is something they can commit to; and why exactly this is important to them. Where matters get complicated is with a class of individuals known to the scientific community as being TOFI, or “thin on the outside, fat on the inside,” or, more colloquially, skinny fat. I should note these two terms are not exactly interchangeable, as the former has more to do with health parameters and the latter to do primarily with aesthetics. However, it is this dichotomy I wish to address, and so for the purpose of this article, it suffices to consider these terms one in the same. What does it mean to be skinny fat? The skinny fat body type has a characteristically disproportionate distribution of visceral (abdominal) fat to subcutaneous fat. In essence, these individuals likely have underdeveloped lean tissue throughout (explaining their outward “skinny” appearance), yet they have large amounts of fat in the midsection (hence the inward “fatness”). Dr. Jimmy Bell, professor at the Medical Research Council’s center at Imperial College in London, created the aforementioned TOFI acronym to describe these individuals. As stated earlier, this was originally highlighted in the literature to point out the poor metabolic profiles that were observed despite BMIs pointing either to normal weight or underweight. They display high
blood triglycerides, prediabetes, chronic i n f l a m m a t i o n , hypertension, and other hallmark traits typically seen in obese patients that predispose them to cardiac events. Which do you choose? For such individuals, I vehemently reject the push to get them to “just eat more” and lift weights in hopes that they will bulk up, effectively ignoring the dangers of their visceral fat deposits. My word on the matter, which of course does not constitute medical advice, is that they should be treated much like obese patients with similar metabolic deficiencies. Yes, this means cutting. But, more specifically, this means a diet high in fruits and vegetables, naturally raised/farmed meats, careful attention to saturated fat intake (not all saturated fats are bad, but by in large they should not make up a large portion of one’s fat intake), plenty of monounsaturated fats, and so on. Allow me to expand further on the importance of this. Why is treatment of TOFI so imperative? This is still a murky area in the literature, and so I do not mean to make the following appear to be an exhaustive, or even fully accurate, explanation. I will only speak to the points of which I believe there to be enough grounding to warrant further observation. The fat distribution in these individuals tends to exist around their vital organs and streaked through their underdeveloped muscles, all areas that are associated with the health risks of obesity. In comparison to visceral fat, subcutaneous fat predisposes to virtually none of the same conditions, as elucidated by results from a 2009 review of the famed Framingham Heart Study. For example, when visceral fat is surgically removed, plasma glucose and insulin levels drop (this is good). Yet when subcutaneous fat is removed, glucose metabolism is not improved. The argument could even be made that some subcutaneous fat might be protective, as posited by the ectopic fat hypothesis. This has been shown
in scientific trials. Diabetes medications that increase fat mass have shown to improve insulin sensitivity. And, interestingly enough, when subcutaneous fat is transplanted into visceral compartments of mice, fat mass was decreased and glucose metabolism improved. But why? The exact physiological mechanisms that differentiate these two types of adipose tissue are still largely unknown. Adipocytes are a unique type of body cell, as they are responsible for paracrine, endocrine, a n d e x o c r i n e signaling; they may have implications for human reproductive capabilities; and they exhibit a whole host of other functions that set them apart from most cells. One such difference, which can suffice as a tentative answer to this question, is that their gene expression may vary greatly depending on the fat type. Visceral fat shows disturbances in this realm, an example being the overactivation of lipolysis-blocking molecules. So, though we are far from having definitively understood pathophysiologies of the mechanisms of visceral fat, enough hypotheses, and certainly enough lab and practical observations, exist to make the case for its role in promoting obesityrelated diseases. In closing I hope it is now clear why individuals with such a body type (and this of course encompasses obese individuals as well) need to be focusing on weight loss and not “bulking.” I point to this specifically only because I see the advice given quite often in the lifting community and feel this is irresponsible at best. Note that while the focus of such individuals should not be a “bulk,” in which body fat gain is expected, the retention or even increase in muscle mass should absolutely be strived for. In sedentary individuals or those new to exercise, gaining muscle while losing weight and improving health parameters is a common reality, when prescribed the proper diet.
by
N oelle Z immerman S taff W riter
The past few months have been very overwhelming in terms of what has been happening all around the world. Sometimes people are able to stand up for what they believe in and fight what is wrong. However, sometimes people read about terrible things and simply cannot do anything about them. Over the past few weeks, it has been very difficult for people to read the news. In one of my classes, the professor asked us what emotions we feel and what emotions people around us feel about what they see on the news these days. A few things named were sadness, guilt, anger, and more. When she asked us if we knew anyone who felt any positive feelings about the news, not a single person raised their hand. Should we even read the news if it is so depressing? Adam Yetsko from Ugly Mug café perfectly explains
why he thinks that we should read the news. “You cannot actually have or form opinions and then choose a president later down the line if you did not watch what happened. You cannot actively choose to fix something if you do not pay attention and watch it. “On the same note, you have to be really careful where you watch the news because our news right now is split one way or another and even the views that I believe more so are very skewed one way or another. I think now it is really one side or another- there are not many places that are simply willing to give you the facts and allow you to pick your opinion. “The great part of America is that we get to make our own decisions, and we get to vote, whether or not it was the right thing to make that vote I think it was people trying to do the right thing but if you stop paying attention you cannot do the right
thing.” Yetsko continues, demonstrating his opinion that people are struggling to come together in the middle. “ T h e r e w a s something on Facebook recently that basically said if you do not get out and you do not rally and you do not do things then you are a horrible person. That is a very extreme, onesided thing where it is not really our spot to say to everybody that they have to go out and fight for what I believe in or what somebody else does, but if you do, good for it. Show your beliefs.” Yetsko brings up some very good points. While many things on the news could make you sad, it is still very important to read them so that you have the ability to change them. It might be hard to watch, but the people or animals who are going through these tough times suffer more than the reader who simply has to know about it.
Daniella Snyder’s experience as a Mellon Scholar
A ri S naevarsson F eatures E ditor
by
As part of the Mellon Summer Scholarship offered by the school through the Mellon Foundation, ten students were selected this summer to do independent research projects within the humanities. There was also a digital component to this scholarship, keeping it technologically up-todate. Many of these students focused on research that was found in Special Collections and College Archives in the Musselman Library. Daniella Snyder ‘18, an English and Art
History major, chose to do her research on a rare map in Special Collections. Her research can be found here: www. daniellasnyder.sites. gettysburg.edu/maps_ as_art. She described how all of the Mellon Scholars lived together in the same apartment and shared progress on their research. It was presented to the campus community this past summer, and it will also be presented at Celebration this year. She ultimately ended up doing original art history research with Professor Else in the Art History department, since she focused her
research on the art historical perspective of cartography. She will be presenting her research in April at an undergraduate art history symposium in Lebanon Valley College. Daniella says this was a great resource for undergraduate students to explore their passions in the humanities while still maintaining relevance to the 21st century, via the digital component. It gave her the opportunity to gain innumerable talents and a great deal of confidence regarding her abilities as a budding art historian.
THE GETTYSBURGIAN
FEATURES Page 4
♦
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Staff Box
The Gettysburgian Editors-in-Chief, Jamie Welch & Daniella Snyder Advisors, Jim Duffy & Jack Ryan News Editor, Joshua Wagner
MS&T Editor, Kayla Britt
Copy Editor, Morgan Hubbard Social Media Editor, Ben Pontz Web Content Editor, Andy Milone Business Managers, Andrew Fitzsimmons & Jess Schneider
Features Editor, Ari Snaevarsson Opinions Editor, Alex Romano Sports Editor, Claire Healey A&E Editors, Raichl Davenport & Katherine Lentz
THE GETTYSBURGIAN
MONEY, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Page 5
♦
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Scientists create the first human-pig hybrid embryo By Emma Gruner Staff Writer The idea of a hu man-animal hybrid is one that usually generates a host of exotic, otherworldly images. Centaurs, mermaids, freakish mutants... all beings that one generally does not expect to encounter outside of fantasy and science fiction. In actuality, though, these hybrids may be closer to becoming a reality than previously thought. On January 26, a team of researchers at Salk Institute, led by Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte, announced in Cell magazine that they had successfully engineered a human-pig embryo. It is worth noting that these embryos are not designed to mature into nightmarish hogpeople with any semblance of human intelligence or consciousness. Rather, the motivation behind the research is an innovative new approach for growing human organs for those in need. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, an average of 22 people a day die waiting for organ transplants. While there have been s ome a ttempts to grow human organs in Petri dishes, the process is often tedious, and in any case, these organs are never identical to the ones that develop inside an actual human. Thus, the prospect of growing a transplantable human organ inside a non-human being, such a pig, is a useful and promising one. Why pigs, one might ask? According to Pablo Ross, co-author of the Salk study, the organs of pigs are roughly the same size of those in humans, yet they mature at a much faster rate. The gestation period of a pig is four months to a human’s nine, and a newborn piglet can grow into a 200-pound adult in only five months. Total, that’s only nine months from conception to organ-harvest time, w hich, cons ider ing the three-year wait for the average kidney
t r a n s p l a n t , i s v e r y e ncouraging. To create the hybrid embryos, the Salk Institute team injected human pluripotent stem cells (adult cells that have been reverted back into an embryonic state) into the partially developed embryos of pigs. Originally, the team implanted around 2000 hybrid embryos into 41 sows, which ultimately resulted in 18 pregnancies and 186 embryos. After three to four weeks, the embryos were removed from the sows and analyzed by the researchers. According to study author Jun Wu, approximately one out of every 100,000 cells in the embryos were human rather than pig, with the human cells developing into precursors of various tissue types, including heart, liver, and neurons. This project is not the first or only instance in which interspecies hybrids have been created in this manner. On January 25, an international team of researchers, led by Hiromitsu Nakauchi, published an account in Nature about their work with rat-mouse hybrids. In this study, the scientists were able to successfully grow a mouse pancreas inside of a rat. They were then able to transfer insulin-secreting tissue from this pancreas into those of diabetic mice, treating their illness without instigating a harmful immune response. The Salk team expanded upon this research, introducing rat stem cells into mouse embryos. The mice in question survived to adulthood, sporting eyes, hearts, and pancreases enriched with rat cells. With the knowledge that such interspecies organ growth was possible, it was only a matter of time before they turned their attentions toward humans. While the creation of the human-pig embryo is undoubtedly a huge advancement, the project is still not without its obstacles. For one, the research is currently not eligible for federal fund-
ing, forcing the Salk Institute to rely on private donations. In 2015, the U.S. National Institute of Health instituted a moratorium that banned federal contributions to certain human-animal hybrid research. This stance is primarily for ethical reasons; many are concerned that such studies could result in an animal developing a humanlike consciousness, although the researchers assert that such an outcome is unlikely. While the NIH did draft a less restrictive policy in August 2016, it has yet to be implemented. Of course, as mentioned above, the Salk team is still in the very early stages of this research; by all accounts, a healthy, adult human-pig hybrid is likely still a far-distant prospect. Pigs and humans are much more distantly related than rats and mice, so coaxing the different cells to grow together is not an easy feat. The researchers’ results confirmed this difficulty, as the fourweek-old embryos analyzed were much smaller and less developed than a pig embryo would normally be at that stage in the pregnancy. Obstacles aside, the repercussions of this study are huge. As Izpisúa Belmonte remarks, “We were just trying to answer the yes or no question of, can human cells contribute at all? And the answer to that question is yes.” The fact that the human cells survived embryonic development at all is immensely encouraging towards those meaning to continue the research. As the team continues to tweak their methods, they can still use the hybrids to study human embryo development and disease in an environment not affected by the normal ethical constraints. In any case, this particular field of science promises some exciting developments in the next several years!
Changes to the EPA under the Trump administration B y G raham A labdulla S taff W riter The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was officially established in 1970 by America’s then-leader, President Nixon. This agency was formed to determine and restrict the negative effect that citizens in the United States had on the environment. Notable legislation from the EPA include the Clean Air Act (CAA) in 1970 and subsequent Clean Water Act (CWA) in 1972. But, over half a century later, the EPA may undergo significant changes by the forty-fifth leader in America’s history, President Trump. During President Trump’s presidential campaign, he advocated for the federal government to decrease its involvement with domestic industries, most notably oil and gas. After Trump be-
came President, he eventually nominated Oklahoma’s attorney general, Scott Pruitt, as the head of the EPA. Pruitt has previously sued the EPA on fourteen different occasions, focusing on their overinvolvement in the regulation of the economy. Pruitt, like other members of Trump’s cabinet, has expressed willingness to accept that humans have impacted the environment, but have not directly said that humans are the main contributors to climate change. In addition to these concerns of the EPA being led by an individual who has and currently is suing the department, Trump has also expressed his intention to reduce the power of current initiatives of the EPA including the CAA, and CWA. Recently, he instructed the EPA of-
ficials to temporarily freeze all grants and contracts. If President Trump and his cabinet achieve the changes they propose to the EPA, there will be greater economic freedom and profits for companies extracting oil and gas, but it remains to be seen whether these benefits outweigh the negative effects of the pollution from these industries. Overall, President Trump has the power to significantly impact the EPA and our energy policy, through budget cuts, executive orders, and changing how scientists within the EPA use foreign data from organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to determine the link between human activity and climate change.
By Aphra Murray Staff Writer On January 26 2017, in the midst of an array of news about the presidency, Science featured an article that claimed that scientists had finally achieved the goal of turning hydrogen into a metal. Researchers from Harvard University say that under a pressure 4.9 million times that of atmospheric pressure, they observed a shiny quality to hydrogen: one of the defining features of a metal. This, they say, is evidence of their experiment’s success. If correct, this could be a potential method for the development of a material capable of superconductivity: the ability to conduct electricity with
no resistance. Ideally, this material could be used make faster digital circuits and more efficient electric motors, among other uses. A solution to the problem of superconductivity has been the result of a decade’s worth of research. Despite the magnitude of this seemingly magnificent accomplishment, there are critics who dispute these published findings. Physicist Eugene Gregoryanz of the University of Edinburgh has specifically pointed out the review process which the Harvard researchers underwent. Given the evidence, he believes that the pressures achieved were not 4.9 million times atmospheric pressure. Grego-
ryanz also noted that the experiment has only been performed once and does not believe this to be in accordance with the reliability and reproducibility of results that is normally accepted by publishers. This group is not the first to announce the results of its success in producing metallic hydrogen, as many groups have published and had their findings overturned in the past. Only time will tell whether these findings will also be overturned, but regardless, should encourage any other research groups to try and reproduce these results.
Researchers say they have turned hydrogen into metal
AppTeezr
Byte-size reviews of the latest apps Duobook
Love to listen to audiobooks and read eBooks as well? This one’s for you! The new app Duobook allows you to seamlessly switch between a n a u d i o b o o k a n d i t s e B o o k counterpart. You can read the book on your phone or iPad and then pop in your headphones to listen to the next chapter while you are in the gym. Although only a select number of titles are currently available, as the app gains traction and popularity it is likely to add a more diverse selection. Free Category: Books Updated: Feb 01, 2017 Version: 1.2.0 Size: 47.0 MB Language: English Seller: Findaway World © 2016 Findaway
Photo Credit: usatoday.com Independently-funded researchers led by Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte at the Salk Institute created the very first human-pig embryo hybrid. The researchers hope that the developed animals could be used to harvest human organs. Today, a person could wait three years to get a kidney transplant; this innovational approach could change that. Critics of the experiment believe it raises ethical concerns.
THE GETTYSBURGIAN
Page 6
A&E
♦
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Featured films in WZBT: Gettysburg Gettysburg College’s Very Own Radio Majestic Theater Jackie hour, 40 minutes – R “3 Oscar Nominations” Following the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy (Natalie Portman) fights through grief and trauma to regain her faith, console her children, and define her husband’s historic legacy. Also starring Peter Sarsgaard & Greta Gerwig. Friday - Saturday (2/10 - 2/11) - 4:15 PM and 7:15 PM Sunday (2/12) - 2:15 PM and 5:15 PM Monday - Thursday (2/13 - 2/16) - 4:15 PM and 7:15 PM 2017 Oscar Nominated Shorts NR (see www.gettysburgmajestic.org for titles & description) ANIMATED SHORTS (1 hour, 26 minutes) Friday - Saturday (2/10 - 2/11) - 4:00 PM Sunday (2/12) - 2:00 PM Monday - Thursday (2/13 - 2/16) - 4:00 PM
WZBT’s Top Weekly Adds and Albums “Artist”- “Disk” - “Label” WZBT Radio 200 | ‘Top New Releases’ | CMJ 1408 All Them Witches- Sleeping Through the War- New West Homeshake- Fresh Air- Sinderlyn Hideout- So Many Hoops, So Little Time- Small Plates Greyface- Grayola WZBT Radio 200 | ‘Top 10 Requested Albums’ | CMJ 1408 Cherry Glazerr- Apocalipstick -Secretly Canadian 11 Hard Proof- Stinger -Modern Outsider 10 The Flaming Lips- Oczy Mlody -Bella Union 10 Priests- Nothing Feels Natural -Sister Polygon 10 The Regrettes- Feel Your Feelings Fool!- Warner Bros. 10 Mick Harvey- Intoxicated Women- Mute 10 Hooton Tennis Club- Big Box of Chocolates- PIAS America 10 Dr. Dog- Abandoned Mansion 9 Brandon Can’t Dance- Graveyard Of Good Times-Lucky Number 9 Cory Hanson- The Unborn Capitalist From Limbo-DRAG CITY RECORDS
LIVE ACTION SHORTS (2 hour, 10 minutes) Friday - Saturday (2/10 - 2/11) - 7:00 PM Sunday (2/12) - 5:00 PM Monday - Thursday (2/13 - 2/16) - 7:00 PM
New Schmucker Art Gallery
Gateway Theater Showtimes
exhibitions gain popularity
FRIDAY FEBRUARY 10TH THRU WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 15TH ** NO SHOWS AFTER 8PM MONDAY – THURSDAY ** **BARGAIN TUESDAYS – ALL SEATS $5 – ADDITIONAL FEE FOR 3D** 50 SHADES DARKER R I.D. REQUIRED (1:20) (4:20) 7:20 10:00 NO PASSES THE LEGO BATMAN MOVIE PG NO PASSES (1:10) (1:40) (4:10) (4:40) 7:05 7:35 9:35 JOHN WICK: CHAPTER TWO R I.D. REQUIRED (1:30) (4:30) 7:15 9:55 NO PASSES RINGS PG-13 (1:25) (4:25) 7:20 9:50 A DOG’S PURPOSE PG (1:45) (4:45) 7:10 9:35 SPLIT PG-13 (1:15) (4:15) 7:25 10:00
Photo Credit to Khun Minn Ohn
B y D aniella S nyder
HIDDEN FIGURES PG (1:20) (4:20) 7:10 9:55
Editor in Chief
THE SPACE BETWEEN US PG-13 10:00
Broadway
Director
discusses theater and life B y K evin W right Staff Writer
The Kline Theater was filled on January 25th for an open forum and discussion sponsored by the Theater Arts Department. They had gathered to listen to and discuss theater with Broadway Director Moritz von Stuelpnagel , director of the critically acclaimed and unlikely hit ‘Hand to God’, a play about a boy who believes his sock puppet is possessed by Satan. Throughout his talk, Stuelpnagel exemplified an enthusiasm for his passion, the stage, and life in general. His discussion ranged from anecdotes from his “starving artist” days to sometimes pseudophilosophical interpretations of what makes great storytelling, all the way to the seemingly mundane, like what podcast he listened to that morning. Through all of this, those in attendance encountered a man who carefully balanced humility with a distinct and overarching pride in his craft. After graduating with a Theater Arts degree from Rutgers University, Stuelpnagel went to the place almost every aspiring theater player goes: New York City. While working a variety of odd jobs, Stuelpnagel constantly hit the pavement looking for any theater opportunities he could find. He was a young artist, hungry for work, and looking to get a foot in the door in the highly competitive New City theater scene. During this time, he began to meet people that had something in common with him, in that they were fellow theater newcomers and outsiders.
They had no gigs in traditional theaters, so they performed in unorthodox settings such as the back of a crowded city deli. Stuelpnagel said that sometimes these performances would have as little as three spectators, but this did not discourage him and his fellow players. They wanted to pursue and perfect their craft, even if there was no audience to watch them. Almost all of them were self-titled “romantics” that believed in art for art’s sake. During this time, Stuelpnagel sent letters to almost every off- Broadway and Broadway theater saying that he would take on a production role, no matter how small, in order to gain experience. His letters went almost entirely unanswered, because in his own words he was unknown to almost every theater producer at this time. Eventually, word of the quality of his performances in the back of delis and bars spread around, and he had the opportunity to work with a variety of small off-Broadway theaters. He eventually came upon the original play that would dramatically change come to largely define his career up to this point, ‘Hand To God’. Written by playwright Robert Askins, ‘Hand To God’ details how a boy comes to terms with his grief about the death of his father. The play is auto-biographical: the writer lost his father at a young age and grew up in an ardently Christian household like the protagonist in the story. Stuelpnagel had the opportunity to see the production through from its small Off-Broadway beginnings
to its Tony Award nominating and international success. Not only did he do this, but he retained much of the same cast and crew that began with him at the small 50 person capacity “Blackbox Theater”, all the way to the 1000 seat “Booth’s Theater” on Broadway. M o r i t z V o n Stuelpnagel had realized his dream: he was on Broadway. Shortly thereafter, he was surprised to learn that ‘Hand of God’ was nominated in five categories at the 2015 Tony awards, including Best Direction. In Stuepnagel’s eyes, it was a wild and unlikely ride, and he and his collaborators weere just happy to be along for the ride. Being a Tony Award winning director opened many doors for Stuelpnagel. He has multiple projects in production right now, including a revival of the comedy ‘Present Laughter’, staring Academy Award winner Kevin Kline, opening on April 5th. Stuepnagel concluded by offering advice for those wishing to pursue a future in theater. Instead of focusing on specific genres like tragedies, musicals, or comedies, he encouraged aspiring thespians to focus on exploring the range of human emotion in a character, no matter what the context or setting. He looked to the future and what new innovations,
S c h m u c k e r Art Gallery held their opening reception this past Friday evening, February 3, 2017 for their two newest exhibitions: “Posada: Jose Guadalupe Posada and the Mexican Penny Press” and “Conversations: Studio Art Faculty Exhibition”. Over 250 visitors attended, making this reception one of the gallery’s most successful events. “Conversations” features the work of six studio art faculty members. While some of their work featured their tried & true mediums—Professor Blair selected his black & white photography, for example, other professors stepped out of their comfort zone to display more experimental works. John Kovaleski, who usually teaches drawing courses at the college, displayed a collection of work
that showed his experimentation with abstract expressionism. Each professor’s selected works have an adjoining card that re-tells a conversation had between the faculty member and a current art & art history undergraduate student on campus. Each student and professor pairing delves into the creative process, and reflects the students’ budding scholarship in the art world. “Posada”, the exhibition occupying Project: Space features an array of mass media in 19th century Mexico called penny press publications. The penny press publications were inexpensive to make, and they were intended to educate the middleand working-class communities in Mexico. Posada is most known for his satirical designs of calaveras, or skeletons, that were distributed on handbills during the Day of the
Dead. Most of Posada’s illustrations provide a rich narrative that seem to tell a story all on their own. The exhibitions will be in the gallery until March 10th. Other upcoming events for the Schmucker Art Gallery include a lecture by Diane Miliotes, the interim curator of Modern Art and Design, Smart Museum of Art, University of Chicago. The lecture will be in Bowen Auditorium on Thursday, February 9, from 5:30-6:30. A reception is to follow in the gallery from 6:307:30. Current sophomore Vanessa Martinez will be delivering a gallery talk on Wednesday, February 15, from 12-1 pm in the gallery. Martinez translated the titles of Posada’s penny press headlines from Spanish to English, and provided exhibition labels in Spanish for gallery visitors.
stories, and voices will be expressed by young people like those in our very own Theater Arts Department.
Student Shannon Gross and Professor Mark Warwick discuss the creative process during the “Conversations” Gallery Talk. Photo credits to the Gettysburg College Flickr.
THE GETTYSBURGIAN
OPINIONS Page 7
♦
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Note: The opinions published in this section are those of the individual writers and are in no way representative of the views of The Gettysburgian staff, The Gettysburgian or Gettysburg College.
Opinions, please: A R e a s s u r a n c e s b y t h e Letter from the Editor g i v e n S t u d e n t S e n a t e written to the student body By
ians,
By alex romano opinions editor
I never thought that, upon entering a liberal arts school at the tail end of the Obama years, an age defined by the rise of the PC Movement and its consequential alienation and embitterment of segments of the nation’s youth and the Republican Party, I would see so few opinion pieces published in the college newspaper. I have a variety of feelings with regard to this recent shortage of articles from contributing writers. Among these feelings, however, there is no judgment or disappointment. Rather, I was at first surprised. Was there honestly not enough intrigue, violence, and vitriol to go around during the campaign season that would give cause to a lot of students to submit? Secondly, I was curious. Should there be better advertising on the part of the paper? And then, of course, as we all have a reputation to stake on this campus, amongst the people with whom we live and with whom we share classes and seats in the dining hall, I became selfconscious about the lack of submissions: maybe there needs to be more assurance for potential writers that whatever opinions they have to share will not be used as a basis for judgment of their character, intelligence, or ideology. Whatever the reason, it is indisputable that diverse, original opinions are essential in any intellectual community, and that opinion pieces are important in any free press.
Photo credit: Starmagazine.com
I should emphasize the penultimate word in that last sentence: free. As a writer for the Gettysburgian, you are encouraged to discuss any subject within the section to which you contribute (sections are News; Features; Arts and Entertainment; Money, Science, and Technology; Sports; and. of course, Opinions). For op-eds, particularly, the variety of subjects ranges expansively. A writer has the option to discuss student life, academics, politics, religion, etc. The paper provides full liberty in that respect, and a diversity in subjects is encouraged. Along with an encouragement of diverse subjects comes an encouragement of diverse opinions. We do not want a Democrat-or-Republicandominated newspaper, nor do we want the Opinions Section reduced to a trite, redundant, and edgeless black-and-white page filled with passages expressing series of homogeneous beliefs. Writers are expected to share unique positions, thrust unpopular ideas into the mainstream, and challenge the majority. The Gettysburgian will not benefit from printing a repetition of the same ideology week after week. An artist’s palette is no good if it only mixes one color. Editing is confined to the grammar, punctuation, and overall mechanics of the article, and nothing is done to change the idea of the piece. There is no outside influence on the article whatsoever; it is purely the writer’s own. Now, it is understandable that
students do not always have the time to write. I, myself, am guilty of failing to set an article that I promised my editor I would send to him. It was finals week in December, and I wanted to write an article summarizing and analyzing the wild events of the previous year. However, the realities of that relentlessly demanding stretch of time pre-Christmas prevented me from producing a piece that was of peak quality, so I soon abandoned the project. Thus, The Good, The Dab, and The Ugly: 2016 in Review never came to be. No hard feelings, though. As sure as editors have lives of their own and work that needs taking care of before they have time to worry about the paper, writers have lives and work, too, and are also entitled to setting their priorities. Fair is fair. So there it is. This is my personal policy, and mine only, as I need to assure all potential writers that you have nothing to worry about in contributing to my section. Above is the contract that the writer holds with this editor, within the jurisdiction of the Opinions Section (and only my Opinions Section; I will not speak for anybody else who came before me or will come after me). I will tend to all of the tasks that I have set for myself in this article, knowing that in doing so the members of the student body will have their voices heard. And think: how often is it that you will be able to share your opinions with so many people all at once? Thank you.
the student senate
Dear Gettysburg-
Many of you have voiced your concerns over the issues surrounding the potential repeal of DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). There have been questions regarding Gettysburg College’s “sanctuary campus” status, questions about what a potential repeal would mean on-campus, and what to do if DACA is repealed. As a body, the Student Senate cannot officially comment on these or provide adequate answers. We can’t say definitively what will happen one way or the other. What we can do, however, is assure the student body that no matter what , we will stand up for our peers. We will support our friends and our class-
mates, and we fully expect each and every one of you to do the same, for that is what it means to be a true Gettysburgian. Our college is a college where diverse ideas and different people are welcomed, in fact required, in order to form a cohesive learning and living environment. The Student Senate Executive Board stands with President Riggs in her recent statements regarding D A CA , and w ill as s is t her in any way should she ask for our help. As she said in an email to the student body last week: “We all have an important role to play in furthering the mission and values of our College. Central to these values is our commitment to enhancing and sustaining a campus culture that is inclusive and welcoming for all.” Our diversity is
our strength, and as a body we can and will encourage it. It is what makes us, the Gettysburg community, and America great.
Living in President Donald Trump’s “BigLeague” America By
zack sobeck
staff writer
At approximately noon on Friday Januar y 2 0 th , 2 0 1 7 D o n ald J. Trump was sworn in as the 45th President of the United States. In his inaugural address the new president reassured his constituents that he would not let them down. President Trump was right when he said that his inauguration was like no other, as it was not merely a transfer of power from a political elite of one party to another political elite of a different party.Rather, President Trump’s inauguration signified power being returned from the corrupt global elites back to us, the people. For too long we, the people, have suffered under the yoke of the global and financial elites which dominate our political class. Washington has become a quagmire of special interests, corruption, and global financial entities. Our political class has become hijacked by shills for these global elites, who made their ascension to power possible in the first place with massive campaign donations and favorable coverage in the corrupt corporate media. These politicians serve the interests of these global power structures, not the interests of their constituents. President Donald Trump will drain
the swamp of Washington D.C. and create a new American government which actually does what is in the best interest of its citizens. We the people have taken our country back from this hostile clique of elites who care only for their own self-interest at the expense of the well-being of the American people. We will now, again, have an American government by, of, and for the people. This new American government will have strong borders, obey the rule of law, and will craft policy that benefits the American people and not the big global, political, and financial power structures. Donald Trump will be a president who puts America first and, in his own words, “Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.” President Donald Trump, under the direction of the people, will forge a new American government which will protect its borders from the ongoing invasion of illegal immigration, make new trade deals which protect American workers and American industry, and pursue an America First policy both at home and abroad. Under these America First policies the people will start winning like never before and there will be wealth and prosperity across the nation. More-
You probably have opinions...
Get them published in The Gettysburgian! Contact Alex Romano (romaal02) for more details!
over, President Trump will ring in a patriotic wave of national pride which will usher in a new era of enhanced patriotism and American civic nationalism. For too long, the United States has not put its national interests first in foreign or domestic policies which have matriculated in the form of disastrous trade deals, ludicrous foreign wars, and the current incursion of illegal aliens across our borders. America First policies will include fair trade deals which protect American workers and American industry, a foreign policy which eradicates radical Islam off the face of this planet while avoiding the un necessary wars of nation building, and an impenetrable wall across our southern border which will prevent illegal aliens from flooding into our great nation. President Donald Trump’s “big-league” America signals a return of the American government to its people, and together we will make America strong again, we will make America wealthy again, we will make America proud again, we will make America safe again, and we will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! Together, we will make America greater than ever before.
THE GETTYSBURGIAN
SPORTS
Page 8
♦
Thursday, February 9, 2017
Men’s basketball wins offensive thriller
Bullet Men’s basketball beat Haverford 100-80 in shoot out Shot: By
Athlete of the Week
Senior Sara Graham By
Andy milone staff writer
The Gettysburg College women’s track & field team competed this past Friday, February 3, at the Susquehanna University Indoor Challenge, and while there were many personal records set, the shot put throwers impressed deep into the night with three top ten finishers coming from the Orange & Blue. Senior Sara Graham, a third year varsity athlete, has continued to demonstrate why she is one of the top shot put throwers in school history. This past Saturday featured her best indoor shot put throw of her career, which was good for fourth place among 40 other women from rival schools like Dickinson, York, By emily sheehan & and Messiah. elizabeth hilrfank Staff W T riter h e t h&r S o ports w of 38-4 3/4editor set her closer to the school record of Jane D’Addario, who set the Gettysburg all-time best in 2007 at 38-9 3/4. While Graham is second alltime in the indoor shot put, she is alone at the top in the outdoor shot put with a throw of 41-9 1/4. Her throw was good enough for the s ilv e r me d a l at t h e C e n t e n n i a l C o n f e rence Championships last spring, and Graham continues to be the core of a strong group of throwers which consists of two first year throwers and a first year throwing coach. The Gettysburg track & field team continues their season this upcoming Saturday at the Dickinson Ducharme Classic, where Graham will seek to further her progress towards the Indoor Centennial Conference Championships. Graham has proven to be the veteran leader on the scoreboard of a talented group of Gettysburg throwers, and this is why she is the Athlete of the Week.
emily sheehan
contributing writer
Last Saturday, the Gettysburg College men’s basketball team took on Haverford College in a Centennial Conference matchup. The Bullets had a strong performance in this game, leading the entire contest and coming out on top with a final score of 100-80. Gettysburg’s score of 100 points was the highest they’ve had since Feb 19, 2000 against conference opponent Dickinson. It was a strong showing of Gettysburg’s offensive weapons. Senior captain Cody Kiefer was nine of eleven from the courtand contributed a team high twentytwo points on the day, a season high eight assists and six rebounds. The starting lineup combined for seventy-seven points overall which is a season high for the Bullets’ starters. “I think it kind of just came to us. We didn’t force much. We just stepped into it and everyone was just confident with their shots. It felt good, it felt really good,” said Kiefer. Senior center Mlynue Reeves also contributed nineteen points with seven of nine shooting. Senior captain Pete Christ and junior Cameron Stewart each contributed fifteen and sixteen points respectively. Stewart shot six for eight from the field. “Probably the best night we’ve had as
a team in my four years on the Gettysburg team. I’m very excited to put up a night like this. I think as a team we all came together. It was a total team effort,” said Reeves. Senior center Tanner Kirkpatrick was just one rebound short of a double double after j u s t s i x t e e n m i n u t e s off the bench. He shot thirteen points and had nine rebounds. Firstyear Danny Duffey had a season high nine assists. Gettysburg was in control for the first half of the game. The Bullets had a twentypoint lead headed into
half time. Haverford did manage to get within one point after a 29-10 run in the fourth quarter. “Any time you play a Centennial Conference opponent any team has the chance to cut into a lead. We fell asleep on defense for a little in the start of the second half. Once we stopped fouling and made more stops we were able to get that momentum back,” said Kiefer. After managing to get within one, Keifer hit a three pointer to bring the momentum back to the Bullets. His three made it 64-60 with
10:21 left in the game. Over the next minute and a half, Haverford would remain in striking distance until Gettysburg went on an 8-0 run. Sophomore Alec Warren started and ended the 8-0 run with a pair of threepointers. The end of the run led to a strong finish by Gettysburg. The Bullets went ten for eleven from the field, including three for three from beyond the arc and four for six from the foul line in the last 6:31. Gettysburg would push the lead back up to seventeen
points with 5:09 to play, which left Haverford unable to get within thirteen points for the rest of the game. The Bullets finished out the game in a convincing fashion. The Bullets were successful on both offensive and defensive rebounds scoring sixteen points off of second chances compared to Haverford’s two. This success comes after a long struggle on the defensive end. “I think it was starting on the defensive end. We were getting a lot of stops which gives us confidence on the offensive side,” said Kiefer. The Bullets are now 7-14 overall, and are looking to take the momentum from this win and use it Wednesday night as they take on Dickinson at home. In a previous matchup versus Dickinson on December 7, 2016, the Red Devils came out on top by a mere five points. The Bullets look to come out on the winning end of this contest as the attempt to make a successful campaign in conference play.
Photo credit: Gettysburg College Athletics
Senior captain Cody Kiefer lead Gettysburg’s offense with 22 points, 8 assists, and 6 rebounds.
Women’s swimming finishes strong
Women’s swimming beats rival Franklin and Marshall 157-105 By Claire Healey sports editor
The Gettysburg College women’s swim team won their final dual meet of the 20162017 season. The Bullets were victorious over conference rival Franklin and Marshall College. Gettysburg finished 8-2 in dual meets, putting them second in the conference standings. Gettysburg came away with a convincing victory in the battle of conference opponents. After opening the meet with five straight victories, Gettysburg never allowed Franklin and Marshall the opportunity to catch up. Gettysburg
won eleven of fourteen events on their way to a victory. Senior Sydney Boswell led the way for Gettysburg with victories in the 100-backstroke and 100-butterfly. “I’m really pleased with how I swam today. It’s always important to have a good last dual meet right before conferences. Also this was my last college dual meet, so I’m happy to finish off my career with two wins. Also, it’s nice to come away with a win against a conference rival,” said Boswell. F i r s t - y e a r Kate Crilly also had an outstanding meet for the Bullets with two individual victories as
well as being part of two winning relays. Crilly claimed the 50- and 100-freestyle events and helped the 200-medley relay and 200-freetyle relays. Sophomore Paige Griesse also came away with two individual victories for Gettysburg in the 200 and 500-freestyle events. Griesse was also part of the 200-freestyle relay. Other Bullets with individual victories included sophomore Sadie Stiles in the 100-breastroke, senior captain Caroline Moyer in the 200-breastroke, and first-year Karley Devine in the 1,000-freestyle. Stiles and Devine also
Photo credit: Gettysburg College Athletics
Senior Sydney Boswell won two events against Franklin and Marshall
had runner-up finishes in the 200-breastroke and 500-freestyle respectively. Junior Savannah Llewellyn had a runner-up finish in the 200-butterfly. Sophomore Johnna Hock placed second in the 100-freestyle and firstyear Becca Maroney also came second in the 200-backstroke. In the relays, a 200-medley team of Maroney, Moyer, junior Nicole Farina and Crilly set the early pace for Gettysburg with a full second win over Franklin and Marshall’s ‘A’ relay. In the 200-freestyle relay, a team of Crilly, sophomore Lindsay Hayden, Griesse, and
senior Carlin Baker closed out the meet with another victory, however the relay was swum exhibition. “I think our team swam really well today. We never gave up or lost momentum even when the relay went exhibition. I’m hoping we can take this momentum into conferences to hopefully improve on our second place finish last year. Our freshmen are swimming really well right now and everyone just seems to be stepping up,” said Moyer. Gettysburg placed second last year behind Ursinus College at the Centennial Conference Championships. The Bullets 8-2 record put them just behind Ursinus in the conference standings, so they will be looking to upset firstranked Ursinus at the upcoming conference championships. Some members of the Gettysburg squad will be competing at the McGinness Invitational at Franklin and Marshall this upcoming Saturday, February 11. The rest of the team will be training for the Centennial Conference Championships, which are being held back at Franklin and Marshall’s Kunkel Aquatic Center, February 17th-19th.
This weekend in Gettysburg College winter sports:
Thursday, Feb 9th: Women’s Basketball at Muhlenberg College- 7:30p.m. Friday, Feb 10th: Men’s Indoor Track at Bucknell Tune-Up- TBA Women’s Indoor Track at Bucknell Tune-Up- TBA
Saturday, Feb 11th: Men’s Indoor Track at Dickinson Ducharme Classic- 10:00a.m. Women’s Indoor Track at Dickinson Ducharme Classic- 10:00a.m. Wrestling at Centennial Conference Championships- 10:00a.m. Men’s Swimming at McGinness Invitational-11:00a.m. Women’s Swimming at McGinness Invitational- 11:00a.m. Women’s Basketball vs. Bryn Mawr-2:00p.m. Men’s Basketball at Muhlenberg- 3:00p.m.
Are you interested in writing for the sports section? Contact Claire Healey at healcl01 for more information!