Dance Central March/April 2013

Page 1

March/April 2013

Dance Central A Dance Centre Publication

Small 'C' Contemporary A conversation with Jai Govinda

Content

Jai Govinda has for many years danced, choreographed and presented bharata natyam Indian classical dance, in the context of his company, Mandala Arts and through his annual Gait to the Spirit Festival. Trained originally at Les Grands Ballets Canadiens in his native Quebec City and in Montreal, he went on to train as a bharata natyam dancer in India and has been performing, choreographing and teaching in Vancouver for the past thirty years. AK: I am interested in exploring how notions of contemporaneity are reflected in different artistic communities. Whose definition takes precedence, how does the language valorize some practices and exclude others, especially when the concept becomes a defining trope of eligibility for certain kinds of institutional funding? JG: This idea of the 'contemporary' is quite muddy now, because Western

Small 'C' Contemporary: A conversation with Jai Govinda. Page 1

dance in Canada developed at the beginning mainly through the classical form — Celia Franca who founded the National Ballet of Canada, Ludmilla Chiriaeff, and a few other people, side by side with the movement of Expression Corporelle, a form of physical expression outside of classical ballet. There were pioneers like Jeanne Renauld, and then Martha Graham appeared,

Thinking Bodies: A conversation with Amber Funk Barton. Page 6

which gave rise to a new term: Modern Dance. 'Modern' is not use anymore, except to designate a type of technique such as Graham or LimĂłn, but you don't see it on grant applications. You do see the term 'contemporary'. Now, is contemporary a noun or an adjective? If it is a noun, strictly speaking the work that has been called contemporary doesn't belong, because it was done twenty five years ago, and if you present one of those 'contemporary'

CO : LAB: A research process for composers choreographers and performers. Page 11

pieces today it will have lost its stature, its appeal, its momentum. If you see a Martha Graham piece now, it is like watching an old tableau. It lacks what it did at the time, when it revolutionized the way we were moving. Today, these are just part of the established vocabulary, so the work now looks old rather than contemporary. But if the intent is to refer to work that is fresh, and of today, how can we change this fixed idea of the 'contemporary'? I find myself getting caught, because there is no other terminology. In Montreal, for

Dance Calendar March/April 2013 Page 18

example, they have started to call it Danse Actuelle, but that, too, is a trap: After all, my form of dance is just as 'actuelle'. For me, 'contemporary' means what is of today, a work whose ideology, mind, and action are relevant to the world we are in. continued on page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.