P-Fac files Unfair Labor Practice over online courses PAGE 6
October 2, 2017
Volume 53, Issue 5
ColumbiaChronicle.com
URVEy AYS: ACULTy ISPLEASED
S S F D » CONNOR CARYNSKI CAMPUS EDITOR
» PHOTO ILLUSTRATION AMELIA DETWILER/CHRONICLE
time this year, is considered a pilot program that will be refined and administered again in the Spring 2018 Semester. Although the updated survey is expected to yield better data, the information received this year is still useful to faculty members, she added. The survey—which consisted of 63 questions regarding salary, college resources, leadership, direction and more—was designed to provide information about the average experience of college faculty members, as reported Sept. 14 by The Chronicle. Results from the survey are expected to be shared with members of the Office of the Provost and the Board of Trustees by current Faculty Representative for the Board Andrew Causey.
SEE SURVEY, PAGE 3
RESULTS FROM A new full-time faculty survey reveal that a majority of faculty members are dissatisfied with Columbia’s professional development funding, administrative leadership and current salaries. The survey, administered April 14–25 and completed by 72 percent of all faculty members, was designed with help from former Faculty Liaison for the Board of Trustees Pan Papacosta, Senior Associate Provost Suzanne Blum Malley and members of both the Faculty Affairs Committee and Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate. Joan Giroux, chair of the Faculty Affairs Committee and associate professor in the Art and Art History Department, said the survey, which was conducted for the first
PAGE 20 Underrepresented: society’s beauty perceptions and people with disabilities