Experts express concern for Columbiaâs tuition increase, financial state
PAGE 3
Technology syncs with every part of life Volume 52, Issue 13
ColumbiaChronicle.com
Nov.
28 2016
PAGE 20
Four years in the making:
Staff says âyesâ to new contract
» FILE PHOTO
» FILE PHOTO
» WESLEY HEROLD/CHRONICLE
years of negotiations that left Columbiaâs union feeling underappreciated, the college and United Staff of Columbia College have come to a contract agreement, which will now take effect following its Nov. 22 ratification vote. US of CC, the collegeâs staff union, met Nov. 21 at Stage Two auditorium in the 618 S. Michigan Ave. Building to cast their ratification votes on the recent collective bargaining agreement between the staff union and the college. Additional polling places were available Nov. 22 in the 623 S. Wabash Ave. Building and the 916 S. Wabash Ave. Building for members who could not attend the ratification vote meeting. Of the 70 percent on campus full-time members voted, 98 percent of them voted in favor of the contract ratification, according to Mary Badger, US of CCâs negotiations committee chair and director of theatre facilities in the Theatre Department. At the meeting, Badger led a discussion about the agreements expressed in the contract. US of CC Vice President Tanya Harasym, operations coordinator for the Learning Studio and adjunct professor in the AFTER NEARLY FOUR
» FILE PHOTO
Humanities, History & Social Sciences Department, said the agreement could not have come at a better time. âIt will do nothing but boost morale at a time where [morale] is very low, when thereâs been layoffs and things of that nature,â Harasym said. âThis is going to give people some renewed hope in the administration and renewed dedication to their jobs.â More than 15 staff members lost their positions at the college because of budgetary constraints, as reported June 6 by The Chronicle. Cat Bromels, member of US of CCâs bargaining team and contract support team and print services manager in the Design Department, said the amount of time these negotiations have taken and the process of reaching an agreement was âincredibly frustrating.â âThe amount of time it took was disgusting,â Bromels said. âIt really made a lot of people feel like their jobs werenât seen as worthwhile, seeing how the administration views the school and views our efforts toward education.â Bromels added that one aspect that made reaching a contract agreement so difficult was having three different
SEE CONTRACT, PAGE 12
» AMELIA GARZA CAMPUS REPORTER