The Appalachian
TheAppalachianOnline.com
Athletes again found responsible
by ANNE BUIE
Senior News Reporter
Four Appalachian State University students have been found responsible for sexual offenses, sexual misconduct, harassment, hostile communication and accessory to a code violation following a Student Conduct Board hearing that took place March 29 to 31, junior history secondary education major Meagan Creed said in an interview with The Appalachian this week. A fifth student was charged with the same counts as the other four, but was only found responsible for harassment and attempting to commit and be an accessory to a code violation, Creed said. That student is still on Appalachian’s 2012 football roster but is only allowed to participate in football practices, not games, Creed said. The other students have been suspended from the university for a total of eight semesters. Creed brought charges against the students after an alleged sexual assault incident that took place April 28, 2011. Hearings were initially held throughout December and January. Two of the accused students were found responsible for harassment and accessory. Another two students were found responsible for all charges. The final student was not found responsible on any charges. Creed appealed the Student Conduct Board’s initial decision because she said the board was not properly trained to handle sexual assault and rape cases. Creed had the option to appeal the March 31 decision as well, but said she decided against it. “I’m moving away from this situation and trying to close this chapter in my life,” she said. Another former student, Alex Miller, brought charges against two of the students Creed accused. Miller said she has decided to pursue another hearing against those students, including the student who was only found responsible for two charges out of four. “I am going to come back to App State one last time to make sure this rapist gets the punishment, along with his fellow womanizers,” said Miller, who is no longer enrolled at the university and plans to transfer next semester. Specific details of student conduct proceedings are confidential, said Hank Foreman, associate vice chancellor for university communications and cultural affairs. “Under certain circumstances, the university is permitted to release limited information about outcomes in student conduct cases, but not until the final administrative action has been taken,” Foreman said.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Vol. 86 No. 44
Cox/Barnes win 2012 SGA election Get to know your new SGA President and Vice-President
by ANNE BUIE Senior News Reporter
W
hen Jake Cox heard the results of the 2012 Student Government Association runoff election, he thought he had lost. When the results for last year’s runoff elections were announced, the losing ticket was read first. This year, Elections Board Chair Frank Byrne decided to announce the losing ticket last. So when Cox - who will serve as SGA president next year - heard his name first, he was convinced he had come up short. “I didn’t even hear the number until [Barnes] turned and hugged me,” Cox said. Cox and Barnes, the 2012-13 SGA president and vice-president, received 53 percent of the runoff vote. Candidates Evan Freemyer and Bobby Lee received 46 percent. The number was low, but higher than expected, Barnes said. “We were worried about getting 900 [votes], so the fact that 1,200 [students] came out is pretty impressive,” he said. A total of 1,230 votes were cast in the 2012 runoff election - 1,000 fewer than in the 2011 runoff election. Former presidential candidate Freemyer said the campaigning process was an enjoyable experience regardless of the results. “Eric and Jake were great opponents and I know they will do a great job in the positions next year,” Freemyer said. Freemyer and Lee plan to continue their involvement in SGA, but neither see Election, page 2
President-Elect Jake Cox
Vice-President-Elect Eric Barnes
By this time next year, what are you hoping to have accomplished?
What is your first priority now that you are elected?
I hope that Jake and I will sit down and say that we did everything to the best of our ability and that we didn’t waste time…I want to say that we did make a difference on campus…I want to be able to say we attacked and achieved as much as we could…I want Student Government to have a better image next year. What I mean by image is that it’s marketed and publicized more.
I can’t accomplish any of my platform goals without a cabinet on board. I need people who support me, who can chase after my platform goals, so Eric and I are going to first begin by looking for cabinet. What are you looking for in a cabinet? We’re definitely looking for cabinet members who work together well. People who are driven, motivated and who are good student leaders on this campus.
How do you see your administration varying from the current administration? One thing we want to vary is communication. We touched on that a lot...we want better communication between the faculty and organizations. The 10 senate seats was a great idea but there were a lot of organizations that felt hurt by it too. We want to try to build those bridges. That’s no diss toward the current administration, but there’s always room for improvements.
Would you consider people from outside SGA to be in your cabinet? Absolutely. I think some of the best people we’ve had this year came from outside SGA … I think some of the most potential will come from outside. What do you hope to accomplish?
What’s one of your main concerns for next year and how do you plan to address it? One of my concerns for next year is the budget. The new budget is going to come out and Jake and I still have to fight for that. Tuition is always going to be huge…Regarding student safety, we’re definitely going to look at the blue lights, specifically places that don’t have them.
Olivia Wilkes | The Appalachian
Visit TheAppalachianOnline.com to read the rest of each interview.
It’s a mixture of things. Our F.O.C.U.S element that we had touched on was really important to us. So the feasibility, the organization, the communication, the unity and the sustainability - all of that is really important to emphasize. Obviously, we do have a lot of projects that we want to work on…Programs like the eco-box system - that is something that I want to concentrate on. That’s a big one from last semester, so seeing it carried through and implemented on this campus really would be a cool legacy.
Forest ignites near Heavenly Mountain
Drew Bennett | The Appalachian
A forest fire burned late Monday night, near the Blue Ridge Mountain Club. As of press time, the fire was contained and the cause was still under investigation.
ASU’s four-year graduation rate tops other universities by KELLI STRAKA
Senior News Reporter
Appalachian State University has a higher four-year retention rate than East Carolina University, UNC-Charlotte and UNC-Greensboro. At Appalachian, 39.8 percent of the class of 2010 began as freshmen, remained enrolled and graduated within a four-
year time span. That came just short of the university’s 42 percent goal. For the same graduating class, ECU’s rate was 32.7 percent, UNC-Charlotte’s was 26.3 percent and UNC-Greensboro’s was 29.4 percent. Appalachian’s retention rate rose to 41.5 percent for the class of 2011 - still short of the university’s 43 percent goal.
Some attribute Appalachian’s higher retention rates to a strong focus on high school GPAs and SAT scores during the admissions process. Heather Langdon, the senior associate director for the Office of Institutional Research and Planning, said multiple studies have pointed to high school GPA as one of the strongest predicting factors
for success in college. And Director of Admissions Lloyd Scott said his office works hard to admit students who are likely to succeed. “We work very hard to identify those students who are likely to be successful here, who are likely to persist to graduation and to graduate on time,” Scott said. Appalachian has
also made changes, in recent years, to ensure that students are able to graduate on time. Director of Academic Advising Lynne Waugh pointed to advising programs like Early Registration Advising, a pre-orientation course implemented in spring 2010. Waugh also mentioned DegreeWorks, a new degree audit tool the university
hopes to fully implement by 2012. The university purchased the software for $56,000 after the Student Government Association passed a resolution requesting a 24/7, userfriendly audit system for students and advisors. “This won’t replace the job of the advisor,” Waugh said. “It’s just one more tool that students need help with. We’ll still be needed.”
Correction An April 3 story in The Appalachian incorrectly reported that Ron Hinton and Kevin Kimball were nominated for ASG president and vice-president, and that Arjay Quinto and Juan Virella were waiting for an amendment to an attendance bylaw before they could accept a nomination. Hinton and Kimball were unable to accept a nomination. Quinto and Virella were eligible to accept a nomination.