May 30, 2019

Page 1

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

@thecaliforniaaggie

SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915

the california aggie

THEAGGIE.ORG

@californiaaggie

@californiaaggie

VOLUME 137, ISSUE 29 | THURSDAY, MAY 30, 2019

UC DAVIS TO HOLD ONLY THREE COMMENCEMENT CEREMONIES IN 2020 Chancellor May hopes move will attract national speakers, unify students as graduates of UC Davis and not individual colleges

BY DEANA MEDI NA campus@theaggie.org

What is perhaps the biggest student celebration of the year is about to change, as UC Davis is planning to transition from seven to three commencement ceremonies in 2020. The current summer graduation schedule includes three commencement ceremonies for the College of Letters and Sciences and two for the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, while the College of Biological Sciences and the College of Engineering are granted one ceremony each. This schedule will shift next year to only “three ceremonies of about 2,500 students plus guests for a total of about 10,000 per commencement,” according to UC Davis News and Media Relations. With such a large number of students and guests, a proper venue is needed. UC Davis News reported that the current options are Aggie Health Stadium or Golden One Center in downtown Sacramento, with the added task of having to bus students to the Golden One Center if that becomes the chosen venue. Chancellor Gary May recognized that no mat-

U C DAV I S P H OTO / CO URTESY

ter the venue there will be “transportation logistics to resolve,” such as how “families and friends will need parking, and [how] we will need shuttles to bring people from parking lots to the venue and back. If we hold one or more ceremonies in Sacramento, we will need to determine how to transport people who need a ride.” Despite these future possible difficulties transitioning to a different amount of commencement ceremonies, the chancellor reaffirmed that there is “staff working through these logistics to ensure that, no matter what the venue, our graduates and their families have a wonderful experience on this important day.” Only a few reasons were given as to why exactly this change is in the works, one being that it presents the opportunity to “draw national speakers to speak to our graduating classes and their families,” May said. The importance of portraying a single image of UC Davis rather than a split one played a factor as well. “Students graduate from UC Davis, so we want to honor them with a university commencement ceremony, rather than a college- specific ceremony,” May said.

JUDICIAL COUNCIL RULES 2015 BDS RESOLUTION UNCONSTITUTIONAL Senate Resolution #17 encouraged UC to divest from Israeli companies

JE R E M Y DA N G / AGGI E

BY SA BRI N A HA B C H I campus@theaggie.org Senate Resolution #17, passed by the ASUCD Senate in 2015, was ruled unconstitutional by the Judicial Council for violating Article II, Section 2 and the Student Bill of Rights of the ASUCD Constitution. The decision was unanimous. The resolution, a part of the larger Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, urged the UC to divest from “corporations that aid in the Israeli occupation of Palestine and illegal settlements in Palestinian territories.” The case was brought forward by former ASUCD Judicial Council Chair and former Interim Senator Sydney Hack and former Senator Daniella Aloni. The Judicial Council declared the resolution unconstitutional, as Section 2 of the Constitution states that ASUCD must promote student welfare, and the council found that the resolution “caters to the welfare of a group of students [...] at the expense of the welfare of other students.” The second justification pointed to language in the Student Bill of Rights that prohibits discrimination based on

national origin, ethnicity or political belief. The Judicial Council found the resolution to be in conflict with anti-discrimination language, explaining that the resolution “has led to the discrimination and harassment of students whose ethnicity, national origin or political beliefs are in opposition to the content of the Resolution.” Amid what Aloni called an increase in anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic rhetoric on campus, she and Hack brought the case before the council. “While this resolution may have been passed in 2015, it still has created a toxic environment for students on campus,” Aloni said via email. “There were rumors of another Senate Resolution similar to this one being passed by the current ASUCD Senate Table and we decided it was best to go on the ‘offense’ rather than wait for another wave of antisemitic incidents to take place.” Aloni said that actions intended to sanction Israel, such as academic boycotts, negatively impact Israeli students because the students may feel isolated and discriminated against. “This academic boycott also prevents American students in the U.S. from attending Universities in Israel,” Aloni said. “These boycotts lead to

REVIVE Kombucha 12 oz.

2

79

discrimination against students from Israel, and from the United States.” Hack expanded on this issue, stating that any boycotts of Israel “can negatively affect Israeli students in that they may have invested interest in the companies being boycotted.” Hack also said that boycotts affect all students, because they result in limited cooperation between the U.S. government and the governments that have been sanctioned. ASUCD President Justin Hurst, on the other hand, argued that there is a difference between sanctions against a government and sanctions against the people in a nation. “My understanding of the resolution is that it was specifically targeted against the actions of the Israeli government, not the individuals of Israel,” Hurst said. “Another comparison is with the importance of similar legislation of the U.S. government during apartheid in South Africa. The point of it was to change the government’s actions — it had nothing to do with the people of the country.” ASUCD Vice President Shreya Deshpande echoed Hurst’s argument by emphasizing the fact that there is “no mention of the word Judaism or Zionism.” Deshpande expressed concerns that declaring SR #17 unconstitutional will stop discussions that students need to have about the Arab-Israeli conflict. Deshpande argued that the resolution did not detract from the welfare of a portion of the student body, because the resolution specifically mentions ways the UC could divest from companies that fund the Israeli military. Judicial Council Chair Aria Aghalarpour, however, said that the council agreed that the resolution was harmful to a certain group of students based on the arguments of the plaintiffs, Hack and Aloni. “Throughout the hearing, what

BDS on 9

OL IV IA KOT L A REK / AG GIE

LENGTHY DISCUSSION OVER POLICE DISARMAMENT RESOLUTION ENSUES AT MAY 16 SENATE MEETING

After SR #14 passed, Judicial Council issues temporary injunction BY ALEXI S LOP EZ campus@theaggie.org An estimated 20 members of the public voiced their opinions on Senate Resolution #14, which calls for the disarmament of the UC Davis police, at the May 16 ASUCD Senate meeting. The discussion over the resolution lasted approximately two and a half hours. The resolution, which is non-binding, was ultimately passed in a 7-6 vote after ASUCD Vice President Shreya Deshpande cast the tie-breaking vote. Since the meeting, however, the ASUCD Judicial Council has placed a temporary injunction on the resolution after the Davis College Republicans sued the Association to block the bill. Those who spoke at the May 16 Senate meeting, including senators and other members of the Senate table, professed a range of perspectives and opinions regarding whether or not UC Davis police should be disarmed. The author of the resolution, Blu Buchanan, began the conversation for those in support of disarmament. They spoke about the importance of taking the time to understand the evidence. Buchanan cited the resolution as appearing in a larger conversation — those who choose to take part in this conversation bring different experiences to campus and doing some-

thing such as disarming the police is a common measure, not a radical idea. A member of the campus community mentioned an argument related to mental health, stating that those who suffer mental illnesses are more likely to be killed or brutalized by the police. They added that police approach people of color with unnecessary violence, which in turn creates further problems for those with mental illnesses within these communities. Another member of the community mentioned the recent bookstore incident, stating that disarming the police is not enough due to the fact that during the incident no weapons were used, but the woman in question was still brutalized by UC Davis police. External Affairs Commission Chair Nayzak Wali-Ali said UC Davis Chief of Police Joseph Farrow spoke to them about the decreasing crime rates in Davis. Wali-Ali noted that guns were not used to decrease crimes, so the notion that guns are necessary to reduce crime rates is not accurate. Wali-Ali also mentioned that passing the resolution would not alienate the UC Davis Police Department, as Farrow has been very open to the discussion and open to working with students to ensure their safety, with or without weapons.

DISARMAMENT on 9

ON SALE!

5/15/2019 – 6/4/2019

DAVIS FOOD CO-OP

OPEN DAILY 7AM—10PM 620 G ST, DAVIS • (530) 758-2667

/ea

DAVISFOOD.COOP

@DAVISFOODCOOP


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
May 30, 2019 by The California Aggie - Issuu