DON’T COUNT ON ‘21’ BEING A HIT Blackjack movie, based on true story, fails to remain realistic ARTS
University of Wisconsin-Madison
l
PAGE 5
Complete campus coverage since 1892
l
AN UP-AND-DOWN SEASON IN REVIEW Despite mid-season letdown, hockey team completes a year to remember SPORTS PAGE 8 l
dailycardinal.com
Manning wins District 5, praises campaign staff
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
DANE COUNTY BOARD MANNING
304 votes
66%
146 votes
By Abby Sears
O’HAGAN
THE DAILY CARDINAL
GABRIEL SEHR/THE DAILY CARDINAL
Wyndham Manning addresses friends and supporters at Project Lodge Tuesday night after winning the District 5 election.
manning page 2
SUPREME COURT GABLEMAN
400,310 votes
49%
51%
379,556 votes
BUTLER
Gableman wins in close Supreme Court election By Charles Brace THE DAILY CARDINAL
Wisconsin residents voted Burnett County Circuit Judge Michael Gableman to be on the state Supreme Court Tuesday in a race that went down to the wire. Gableman and incumbent Judge Louis Butler were close in vote totals throughout the evening, but returns showed Gableman pulling ahead around 11:00 p.m. It is the first time an incumbent Supreme Court Judge was defeated in
an election since 1967. However, Butler won in Dane County, winning by ratios of 5-to-1 and 10-to-1 in some campus wards, according to early vote totals. Gableman campaigned largely on his support from law enforcement around the state and his former career as a prosecutor. He said he was a judicial conservative and Butler was a judicial activist. “He won with a very clear message, gableman page 2
THE FATE OF THE ‘FRANKENSTEIN’ VETO
Vetoed In Part Vetoed In Part Vetoed In Part Vetoed In Part
Notwithstanding section 16.42 (1) of the statutes, in submitting information under section 16.42 of the statutes for purposes of the 2007−09 biennial budget act, the department of transportation shall include recommended reductions to the appropriation under section 20.395 (3) (cr) of the statutes for each fiscal year of the 2007−09 fiscal biennium reflecting the transfer from this appropriation account to the appropriation account under section 20.395 (6) (au) of the statutes, as created by this act, of amounts for anticipated debt service payments, in each fiscal year of the 2007−09 fiscal biennium, on general obligation bonds issued under section 20.866 (2) (uup) of the statutes, as created by this act. (4w) PASSENGER RAIL SERVICE. (a) The department of transportation may submit, in each fiscal year of the 2005−07 biennium, a request to the joint committee on finance to supplement the appropriation under section 20.395 (2) (cr) of the statutes by up to $572,700 in fiscal year 2005−06 and up to $629,900 in fiscal year 2006−07 from the appropriation account under section 20.865 (4) (u) of the statutes for passenger rail service. Any request submitted under this paragraph shall be submitted by the due date for agency requests for the joint committee on finance’s second quarterly meeting under section 13.10 of the statutes of the year in which the request is made. The committee may supplement the appropriation under section 20.395 (2) (cr) of the statutes by up to $572,700 in fiscal year
Assembly, according to Harsdorf. Amendment co-sponsor state Sen. Tim Carpenter, D-Milwaukee, commended the legislature’s support of the referendum. “For me, it’s not a partisan issue, it’s institutional,” Carpenter said. “It’s not directed toward Gov. Doyle whatsoever, it’s the powers of future governors I’m worried about.” Despite the overwhelming support of the measure, Gov. Jim Doyle displayed less enthusiasm for the amendment, though he never officially denounced it. “I’ve just sort of stayed out of it because it has to do with longer-term
carried out because of such transfer. (c) If the committee approves a supplement under paragraph (a), the committee may supplement, by the amount by which the supplement it approves under paragraph (a) is less than $572,700 in fiscal year 2005−06 or $629,900 in fiscal year 2006−07, other department of transportation appropriations. Notwithstanding section 13.101 (3) of the statutes, the committee is not required to find that an emergency exists prior to making the supplementation. (d) If, in considering a request made under paragraph (a), the joint committee on finance determines that $572,700 in fiscal year 2005−06 or $629,900 in fiscal year 2006−07 is not sufficient to fund passenger rail service, the committee may supplement the appropriation account under section 20.395 (2) (cr) of the statutes, from the appropriation under section 20.865 (4) (u) of the statutes, by an amount that would not cause the transportation fund to have a negative balance. Notwithstanding section 13.101 (3) of the statutes, the committee is not required to find that an emergency exists prior to making the supplementation. (5f) VILLAGE OF OREGON STREETSCAPING PROJECT. In the 2005−07 fiscal biennium, from the appropriation under section 20.395 (2) (nx) of the statutes, the department of transportation shall award a grant under section 85.026 (2) of the statutes of $484,000 to the village of Oregon in Dane County for a streetscaping project on Main Street and Janesville Street in the village
II I I I The department of II transportation shall ... transfer to the ... general ... fund ... from ... the transportation fund ... in the 2005-07 I fiscal biennium ... $4 ... 2 ... 7 ... 0 ... 0 ... 0,000 II
Vetoed In Part Vetoed In Part Vetoed In Part Vetoed In Part Vetoed In Part
source: www.legis.state.wi.us
frankenstein page 3
PIECING TOGETHER FRANKENSTEIN The ‘Frankenstein veto’ allows Wisconsin governors to edit legislation by striking words to create new sentences. Gov. Jim Doyle used this power in 2005 to shave 752 words out of a budget bill, creating a $159 million increase in the amount of money transferred from the transportation account to the general fund.
Vetoed In Part
I
institutional relationships between the legislature … I do think people have vastly overblown what this is all about, and I think that the voters should be very careful in changing the constitution and not knowing what some of the ramifications of that might be,” Doyle said. “It’s important that the governor have a strong partial veto.” However, Doyle has criticized the breadth of the partial veto power in the past. According to Jay Heck, executive director of the bipartisan group Common Cause in Wisconsin, Doyle
Vetoed In Part Vetoed In Part Vetoed In Part
2005 Wisconsin Act 25
− 374 −
(5g) CHIPPEWA COUNTY CROSSING AND RAMP. In the 2005−07 fiscal biennium, from the appropriation under section 20 .395 (2) (nx) of the statutes, the department of transportation shall award a grant under section 85.026 (2) of the statutes of $80,000 to Chippewa County for the construction of a pedestrian−railroad crossing and handicap−accessible ramp related to the Ray’s Beach revitalization project on Lake Wissota in Chippewa County if Chippewa County contributes funds for the project that at least equal 20 percent of the costs of the project . (5h) VILLAGE OF WESTON BICYCLE−PEDESTRIAN
“…the great state University of Wisconsin should ever encourage that continual and fearless sifting and winnowing by which alone the truth can be found.”
JILL KLOSTERMAN/THE DAILY CARDINAL
With the flick of his tool he cuts, incises, conjoins and, ultimately, creates—creates what some view as an abomination of power. The “tool” is a veto pen, the creations are changes in bills that often circumvent the power of the state legislature and “he” is the Wisconsin governor in the last two decades. The partial veto, dubbed the “Frankenstein” veto, has allowed Wisconsin governors enjoy some of the broadest powers in the United States with the ability to strike out partial sentences from fiscal legislation and join other sentences together to create entirely new meanings. Tuesday, an overwhelming majority of Wisconsin voters voted yes to a statewide referendum to create limitations on the governor’s ability to reconstruct spending bills. State Sen. Sheila Harsdorf, RRiver Falls, introduced the constitutional amendment after a particularly extensive and publicized use of the partial veto by Gov. Jim Doyle in 2005. Doyle excised 752 words from a budget bill and left a 20-word sentence shifting $427 million from transportation to education, a measure never approved by the legislature. “This resolution, what we are proposing … is basically saying the governor will be prohibited from
creating a new sentences by combining two or more other sentences,” Harsdorf said. “No governor should be able to use the partial veto authority to enact laws that have not passed the legislature.” With the approval of the referendum, Doyle and future Wisconsin governors will no longer be able to create new sentences by crossing out words or numbers from two or more existing clauses. The amendment received strong bipartisan support before appearing on the April 1 ballot, passing with a 33-0 vote on second consideration in the Senate and a 94-1 vote in the
III
THE DAILY CARDINAL
II
By Alex Morrell
IIIII
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials released Tope Awe, a UW-Madison pharmacy school student, from custody in Milwaukee Tuesday, pending deportation. According to ICE spokesperson Gail Montenegro, Awe and her brother Oluwabenga received orders for deportation. Both are required to wear ankle monitoring bracelets and check in periodically with immigration officials while documents for their return to Nigeria are assembled. Awe was placed in federal custody March 27 after being summoned to the Milwaukee immigration office. According to Montenegro, Awe’s family emigrated from Nigeria in 1989 and repeatedly applied for immigration benefits but their requests were repeatedly denied. ICE gave the family until July 31, 2004 to leave the county. “The Awe family failed to make any contact with ICE after July 2004 as required, and they remained in the United States illegally,” Montenegro said. “In failing to comply with the conditions set by ICE, the Awe family became immigration fugitives with outstanding orders of deportation.” UW-Madison students rallied against immigrant deportation Monday, and members of several student organizations are circulating a petition on Awe’s behalf.
UW-Madison senior Wyndham Manning won the District 5 seat on the Dane County Board of Supervisors, according to Tuesday’s preliminary vote totals. Manning captured nearly 66 percent of votes to beat out freshman candidate Conor O’Hagan, who obtained around 32 percent of votes. Manning celebrated his victory with friends at Project Lodge and credited his success to the hard work of his campaign staff and student voter support. “We stayed true to what we were talking about and we stayed honest with our faults and with our strengths, and we came out on top because of it,” Manning said. After spending a laid back evening awaiting the election results with friends in his dorm room, O’Hagan offered words of encouragement to his opponent. “I wish him the best of luck and I’d like to congratulate him. I really hope he represents the district to the best of his ability,” O’Hagan said. Manning said he is looking forward to meeting with his predecessor, UW-Madison senior Ashok Kumar, to
IIIIII
Federal officials to deport UW-Madison pharmacy student
32%