TCCD Collegian December 8, 2021

Page 1

collegian.tccd.edu A critical hit! PG. 4

Wednesday, December 8, 2021 – Volume 34 • Issue 13 DISTRICT

DISTRICT

Reactions to Rittenhouse verdict Community weighs in on a controversial jury decision JUAN SALINAS II campus editor

Kyle Rittenhouse was found not guilty of five charges Nov. 19. Two counts of homicide, one count of attempted homicide and two counts of recklessly endangering safety. The verdict has sparked a conversation across the country. Rittenhouse was walking around with an AR-15 during a racial injustice protest Aug. 25, 2020. He was chased by Joseph Rosenbaum into a car lot. Rittenhouse shot and killed him and ran away from the scene, causing members of the crowd to chase him. Rittenhouse shot two members of the crowd, injuring one. Gov. Greg Abbott tweeted “Rittenhouse -- NOT GUILTY!” Nov. 19 at 12:18 p.m. after the verdict. NE student Jacqueline Gonzales feels baffled by these types of reactions to the verdict. “This trial proves white privilege exists and is strong amid the court system,” she said. “If Rittenhouse was a Black boy holding an

AR-15, he would’ve been shot.” In a survey done by Pew Research Center, 87% of Black Americans and 61% of white Americans think the U.S. criminal justice system treats Black people less fairly. “While the verdict in Kenosha will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included, we must acknowledge that the jury has spoken,” President Joe Biden said in a press release Nov. 19. “I ran on a promise to bring Americans together because I believe that what unites us is far greater than what divides us.” Wisconsin doesn't currently have a stand your ground law, which justifies the use of deadly force if necessary. But the state does have self-defense that is defined by federal law. According to the law, if a person feels there is unlawful interference by someone else, they can threaten or use force to stop or kill them. “I think this trial says more about our justice system than society,” South student Sophia Rodriguez said. “I’m not surprised, but still disappointed and angry about

the outcome.” The protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, Aug. 25, 2020, was due to the aftermath of Jacob Blake, a young Black man that was shot by a police officer during a traffic stop Aug. 23, 2020. “The justice system works for those it was meant to protect,” SE student Jamea Johnson said. “I am not one of those people.” Rittenhouse has stated he will destroy the AR-15 he used during the events of the night, and support the Black Lives Matter Movement in recent interviews. “Did the prosecution rush to charge Kyle Rittenhouse before reviewing all evidence?” board of trustees member Shannon Wood said. Rittenhouse was arrested Aug. 26, 2020, at his home in Antioch, Illinois, which is 33 minutes away from Kenosha, Wisconsin — the place of the protest. “The prosecution has a duty to only prosecute cases after considering all evidence, and the prosecutor is required to review all evidence prior to requesting or pursuing

Video in Arbery case discussed LOGAN EVANS

managing editor

Henry C. Jorgenson/Shutterstock

Demonstrators outside of the courthouse during the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.

charges against a defendant,'' Wood said. “The state has endless resources to prosecute, and defendants are often without financial means to defend. The state must take time to review all evidence and provide all evidence to a grand jury, and the grand jury must be provided with all evidence to make a decision upon whether to allow a felony to be filed against a defendant.” Wood said the prosecution charged Kyle Rittenhouse with murder within 24 hours, before reviewing all evidence, and when a jury was presented with all the evidence in the case, the jury unanimously acquitted Kyle Rittenhouse.

YEE-HAW, COWGIRL

​​A jury recently found the three men charged in the killing of Ahmaud Arbery guilty on several counts of murder. The verdict came after eight days of testimony, much of which centered around a video of the incident taken by defendant William Bryan. The trial has sparked discussion about the role of video evidence in the justice system. “Video has leveled the playing field,” NE paralegal studies professor Karen Silverberg said. “Eyewitnesses are notoriously bad, just not accurate in a lot of cases. But video doesn’t lie.” Witnesses are often called to testify weeks or months after the event they’re being asked to recount, Silverberg said. With video, a witness must compare their memory with a visual truth. Juries spend less time determining how credible they find a witness to be. “It’s a whole lot harder to claim motivations that are not visible,” Silverberg said.

“Eyewitnesses are notoriously bad, just not accurate in a lot of cases. But video doesn’t lie.”

Karen Silverberg

NE paralegal studies professor

Alex Hoben/The Collegian

Student activities employee Jeni Green yells cheerfully as she tries to hold onto a mechanical bull brought in for the Western-themed day of SE Campus’ spirit week.

The increased prevalence of video in cases like Arbery’s has led to a greater investment of the public across social media. Silverberg believes this is because the public can now watch something, be affected by it and make more directly informed decisions. “With George Floyd, you could count the seconds and minutes,” Silverberg said. “It was a very clear set of circumstances.” South education professor Jeffrey Herr said he is thankful for the rise of smartphones and social media in bringing awareness to issues of racial injustice through video, but he doesn’t believe the guilty Arbery verdict points toward active change. “I’m happy with the verdict, but I am skeptical that progress has been attained,” he said. “What if in 1955, there was video evidence of what happened to Emmett Till when the white mob showed up to his relative’s house to kidnap and kill him? That might’ve turned out a lot differently, too.” NE student Caleb Thompson believes the fact the video was taken and released by one of the killers proves his arrogance in committing a racially-motivated crime. “It’s a great example of how certain people with not-so-good racial views can be so comfortable upon seeing a video of them unequivocally doing a lynching,” Thompson said. “Saying ‘This makes us look good.’” Thompson believes while social awareness spurred by video evidence is a good thing, no amount of public opinion can make up for systemic issues. “If you’re relying on social media to bring about what the justice system should be doing or what the police should be doing, that proves we’re not at a spot we should be,” he said. “Once these institutions are working as they should, social change will follow suit.”

News

Entertainment

Opinion

Opinion

Editorial

BURNTOUT End of semester has students and faculty tired. PG. 2

JILL SANDWICH “Resident Evil” gets a good film adaptation. PG. 4

LISTEN TO TEACHERS Recent tragedy revives discussion. PG. 5

SLOW DOWN Texas drivers need to chill out. PG. 5

BLOODY HANDS Kyle Rittenhouse is guilty of something. PG. 5


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
TCCD Collegian December 8, 2021 by TCC Collegian - Issuu