2009 10 01

Page 1

Sopris Sun THE

VOLUME 1, NUMBER 34 • OCTOBER 1, 2009

Mixed management Which will have a greater impact on local trails – prior managment plans or the Hidden Gems? By Trina Ortega and Terray Sylvester

The Roaring Fork Mountain Bike Association is advocating for trails north of Mt. Sopris to be left out of the Hidden Gems proposal. Photo by Jane Bachrach

T

he Hidden Gems Wilderness Campaign has stolen center stage in the local land management debate, but trail and road use in the White River National Forest is expected to change in any case with the release of the forest-wide Travel Management Plan early next year. Local mountain bike advocates argue that a closure to mountain bikes under the Travel Management Plan would be less restrictive than a closure resulting from a wilderness designation, such as the Hidden Gems wilderness proposal. That’s significant because the Carbondale-based Wilderness Workshop, a lead organization on the wilderness proposal, has argued that there would be little difference between the two forms of closures. In an ad that has run in area newspapers over the last couple of weeks, the Workshop listed more than 65 mountain bike trails that “will not be affected” by the Hidden Gems wilderness proposal, which would add roughly 400,000 acres of Wilderness to the White River National Forest (WRNF). Of those, 20 trails may be closed by the Travel Management Plan. The Roaring Fork Mountain Bike Association (RFMBA) is currently contesting a handful of trails that the Workshop states are unaffected by the Hidden Gems because they would be impacted by the Travel Management Plan. Some of the trails that would be closed to mountain biking are currently ridable and attractive, such as the Anderson/Petroleum Lakes Trail that diverges from Lincoln Creek Road east of Aspen. Kirk Hinderberger, treasurer of RFMBA, describes the trail as the only mountain bike option that diverges from the Lincoln Creek Road. But other such contested trails are patchy, rarely traveled, or difficult to access in the first place. An example is a user-created trail that RFMBA members hope could one day offer a connection from the Hay Park trail system on the north flank of Mount Sopris, near Dinkle Lake, to the Crystal River Valley. The trail runs through private land and is rarely ridden. But board member Charlie Eckart says that RFMBA would like to leave that terrain open to mountain bike access. “The connectivity is what we’re looking for,” Eckart said, while acknowledging that it may be“10 to 15 years”before the trail becomes a reality. Another example of such a conflict is the Huntsman’s Ridge road, which extends north of Highway 133 at the top of McClure Pass. “My understanding is it’s kind of rocky and steep and could use some reroutes in the future,” said RFMBA board member Mike Pritchard, but noted that nonetheless, RFMBA is

WILDERNESS page 7


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.