CSG Comments to VDOT/VDRPT on 495 Southside Express Lanes NEPA Study

Page 1

CSG comments to VDOT/VDRPT on 495 Southside Express Lanes NEPA Study June 21, 2022 The Coalition for Smarter Growth appreciates the efforts of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT) to improve mobility within the I-495 corridor between Springfield and Maryland. However, to truly address the needs of the study area communities on either side of the Woodrow Wilson bridge and the metropolitan region, VDOT will need to take a broader and more holistic approach consistent with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The study approach is flawed from the outset by an overly narrow Purpose and Need and set of alternatives, and by pushing a transit alternative outside of the primary legally required NEPA study. We worry that, like previous VDOT studies, the Purpose and Need inappropriately presumes that the preferred approach will be a Public-Private toll lane project and that this has also influenced the narrow set of alternatives. Finally, the alternatives must include a comprehensive transit, land use (transitoriented development) and TDM alternative (including bike routes, and parking pricing) that addresses the racial and economic inequity of the east-west divide in jobs and housing. Instead of siloed and parallel transit and highway expansion studies, VDOT must evaluate within a single study a range of alternatives that include transit, transportation demand management (TDM), transitoriented land use, tolling with HOV that does not expand overall lane capacity, and options that support the needs of low-income commuters – in addition to the Express Lanes extension alternative. The current proposed approach is not acceptable as it does nothing to address the underlying land use issues causing the mobility and accessibility challenges in this corridor, and it also fails to address the need to significantly reduce corridor greenhouse gas emissions and toxic air pollutants. While VDOT needs to identify alternatives that can be implemented in the short- to mid-range timeframe, it also needs to consider mid-to-long-term solutions and not preclude them by ignoring land use and the adverse induced demand impacts of highway expansion. Information Presented at Public Meetings Suggest a Narrow, Siloed Project Purpose Parallel Transit/TDM and Highway Studies It is still unclear why there are separate studies for improving mobility in the same corridor. NEPA requires study of the range of alternatives to address the purpose and need. VDOT intends to develop alternatives by this Fall; however, there is no information readily available online regarding the DRPT transit study (see Attachment to this comment). It is hard to imagine that the transit and TDM needs will

P.O. Box 73282 × Washington, DC 20056 × smartergrowth.net


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.