Case 2:16-cv-00235-JP Document 16 Filed 03/25/16 Page 1 of 3 I
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Kimberly Lash
CI)TIL ACTION
vs. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, : Matrix Absence Management, Inc. and Temple University Health System Inc.
No1. 16-cv-00235-JP I
I
I
PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HER ANSWER TO MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT, MATRIX ABSENCE! MANAGEMENT, INC. I
Plaintiff, Kimberly Lash, by and through couns,l, Bruce L. Neff, Esquire and Associates, I
submits the following Supplemental Memorandum ~n Support of her Answer To Matrix I
Absence Management, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. ~laintiffs Memorandum In Support of her I
Answer to Matrix' Motion addresses Matrix' positi~n that it should not be responsible for I I
deciding that Plaintiff was not disabled because Relrance was the plan's claims fiduciary. Plaintiff asserts that Matrix' position is erroneous bfcause the tasks performed by Matrix I
were beyond ministerial.
1
1
At the time Plaintiff filed her complaint, she di~ not have possession or substantive I
knowledge of the Third Party Administrative agreetent between Matrix and Reliance. Plaintiff has now been provided with a copy of the 4greement. Plaintiff represents that, I I
should this Court be sympathetic to Matrix' argum911t,Plaintiff should be granted leave to amend her Complaint to allege that Matrix' authorii under the agreement is to grant and !
deny claims, authorize disbursement of benefits, an~ investigate and maintain claims files in I
accordance with industry standards which qualifies ~s fiduciary control respecting the i
1
Ex. N, p. 1