FREE For adults only. Soft Secrets is published six times a year by Discover Publisher BV Netherlands
In this issue:
Issue 6 - 2010
Relative Risks Well, people. In case you didn’t know it already, alcohol is much more harmful for you than weed. Actually, the demon drink comes out at the top of a pretty inclusive list of 20 of the main players in the intoxicants league (The Lancet, 2010)
Top, Middle Or Bottom? Growing from clones has its obvious advantages, but which strains have the quickest strike rate and does it really make a difference where the cutting is taken from the mother? Soft Secrets investigates...
35
Table of contents Page 3 girl Dear Soft Secrets Product flash NFT Names and flavours Grow report: Amnesia Haze Soil and hydro Free Rob Cannabis The Economy Origins of cannabis Poster Jorge Cervantes Community Ask Ed Shop reviews Strain report Comic Ganjaman Music – a stoned selection Poster Shop reviews Colofon Index of ads
3 5 11 15 16 18 21 26 28 30 33 37 43 45 50 56 57 58 60 62 62 62
How this was worked out is complicated, and explaining it would take more than the 600 words allowed me for the purposes of this column. Cutting it down to the essentials, each substance is looked at from different aspects or domains (harm or cost to self, harm or cost to others, cost to society etc) and given a score between 0 and 100, with zero being the least and 100 being the most harmful. Then a lot of clever sums are done and each substance is given an overall mark out of 100 to indicate its overall dangerousness. Obviously, everything has got an element of risk attached to it and therefore none of the substances scored zero. The top three malefactors are as follows: booze scored 72; heroin came second with 55 (surprisingly low, I thought), and then crack cocaine in third with 54. Cannabis comes in as the eighth most dangerous with a score of 20 (more dangerous than Methadone, a point that will raise a few eyebrows).
Why is such a dangerous drug as alcohol still so freely available? Why indeed. Simply put, it comes down to economics and the considerable clout of the alcohol industry. Over the past 100 years or thereabouts, alcohol has been assimilated into the culture as the drug of choice for R&R in Britain. It’s gone from being unrespectable in the early part of the 20th century to being an essential part of any social function less than 100 years later.
Now, the rights and wrongs of this aside – and I’m sure there will be many people out there screaming that this is indeed “all wrong” – the point being made here is that alcohol is legal, whereas the others are not (tobacco is on the list, but I think it can only really be regarded as semi-legal these days by anyone’s standards).
The issue with alcohol is really complicated and full of contradictions: it’s bad for you in quantities over 28 units a week for men and 18 for women, and yet a standard size glass each day of [your tipple of choice here] has been shown to have effects beneficial to health and wellbeing. It costs billions of pounds in lost work
days, police and medical interventions, while at the same time it brings in billions of pounds in tax revenue. Plus we have to think about the number of people employed in the industry from those who make it through to those who sell it. It seems to us that the financial aspects of this are at the heart of the matter. There’s so much money involved one way or another in booze that it’s not in the interests of any government to make too much noise about doing anything serious about it. If there was a sure fire way of monitoring exactly how much cannabis is being grown and traded in the UK we suspect that the current legal status of the plant would change pretty quickly. The botContinues on page 3