Page 1


Volume 142, 2018 $6.95

Ethical Issues in Using Social Media

Jeffrey Jacobs Ten Proven Strategies to Effectively Implement the Two-tier Partner Structure

Joel A. Rose Being a True Giver When Networking

Steve Fretzin Overcoming the Isolation of Being a Solo Practitioner

Terrie S. Wheeler

Workplace Harassment: In Life as in Art!

Kit Goldman and Memo Mendez From Papyrus to Email: The History of Newsletter Marketing

Steve Klinghoffer Why Are Law Firms Falling Behind?

Jim Bliwas

Attorney of the Month

Steve Vasquez, “Getting to Know You”

Law Offices of Luis E Vasquez, Santa Ana

 949-833-3622





Helping People


nt La w

Make Their Dreams Come True


Volume 132, 201 $6.95

7 Disciplines Of a Leader

Jeff Wolf

Abdicate, Delegate, Don’t unting Client Trust Acco

Your Network is Your Net Worth

ckford Sheila M. Bla

Ruth Carter

the A Closer Look at ws e Revie lin On of s tic tis Sta

se 17 Ways to Increa Your Materials’ Readership and Response

n Katie Johnso

aries Civil Alert Summ

Trey Ryder

ntyre Monty A. McI

Learning to Learn

With over sixty years combined experience, John and Thomas Connors limit their Intellectual Property and Patent Law Practice to representing clients at the United States Patent and Trademark Office. John and Thomas Connors are highly skilled at:

Mike O’Horo

PC s e t a i c o s s A & s Connor



iates oc

13421 Danbury Lane, Unit 135 i, Seal Beach, CA 90740 NTY ORANGE COU

rs & Ass no

onth w Firm of the M

Seal Beach roperty Law Intellectual P Excellence in s r o n n o .C w w w


Marijuana and Intellectual Property Law

• Obtaining patents, trademarks and copyrights for your clients • Protecting your clients’ intellectual property rights to prevent idea theft • Establishing your clients’ intellectual property rights both at home and abroad • Providing counsel necessary to navigate the complexities of protecting your clients’ intellectual property

Knowledge Is Power HOT CASES


Washington Redskins fight for their Federal Registration

Summaries of Important Intellectual Property Law Matters

Contact: to receive “Special Reports,” “Hot Cases,” and/or “Law Blogs”

Specialization matters. Having represented more law firms over the last 25 years than any other broker in the region, no one understands their real estate needs better than I do. — JASON HUGHES President & CEO, Hughes Marino


At Hughes Marino we only represent tenants and buyers – never landlords – so we never have a conflict of interest. Our only fiduciary duty is to our client, the tenant. We are fully committed to protecting our clients’ interests, and we always guarantee our service and results. (949) 333-3111 |


2018 EDITION—NO.142



6 Why Are Law Firms Falling Behind?

by Jim Bliwas

10 Being a True Giver When Networking

by Steve Fretzin

14 Workplace Harassment: In Life as in Art! by Kit Goldman and Memo Mendez

EXECUTIVE PUBLISHER Brian Topor EDITOR Wendy Price CREATIVE SERVICES Skidmutro Creative Partners CIRCULATION Angela Watson PHOTOGRAPHY Chris Griffiths STAFF WRITERS Dan Baldwin Jennifer Hadley CONTRIBUTING EDITORIALISTS Jim Bliwas Jeffrey W. Jacobs Steve Fretzin Terrie S. Wheeler Steve Klinghoffer Kit Goldman and Memo Mendez Joel A. Rose WEBMASTER Mariusz Opalka ADVERTISING INQUIRIES SUBMIT AN ARTICLE OFFICE 30211 Avenida De Las Banderas Suite 200 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 ADDRESS CHANGES Address corrections can be made via fax, email or postal mail.



16 Steve Vasquez, Law Offices of Luis E Vasquez, Santa Ana “Getting to Know You” by Dan Baldwin

22 Ten Proven Strategies to Effectively Implement the Two-tier Partner Structure

by Joel A. Rose

26 From Papyrus to E-mail: The History of Newsletter Marketing by Steve Klinghoffer

28 26

28 Overcoming the Isolation of Being a Solo Practitioner

by Terrie S. Wheeler

30 Ethical Issues in Using Social Media

by Jeffrey Jacobs

Editorial material appears in Attorney Journal as an informational service for readers. Article contents are the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of Attorney Journal. Attorney Journal makes every effort to publish credible, responsible advertisements. Inclusion of product advertisements or announcements does not imply endorsement. Attorney Journal is a trademark of Sticky Media, LLC. Not affiliated with any other trade publication or association. Copyright 2018 by Sticky Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Contents may not be reproduced without written permission from Sticky Media, LLC. Printed in the USA

t : sa om f u an Fr l o Ry Al lioJi

We appreciate your business and wish you the Happiest of Holidays and a Prosperous New Year!

W W W. J I L I O R YA N . C O M


Why Are Law Firms

Falling Behind? by Jim Bliwas

This news ought to be deeply disturbing to managing partners and lawyers everywhere, regardless of the size of their firm: Attorneys are losing their once-revered position as a business’ most-trusted advisor. Other professionals are edging them out, especially accountants and consultants. How did this happen? More precisely, why did lawyers let it happen? Something of a parallel might be found in what happened to the American auto industry in the 1970s when Japanese and European manufacturers made their first serious inroads into Detroit’s dominant market position. Several years later, Lee Iacocca—who saved Chrysler from near collapse and liquidation—was asked by the CBS News show Sunday Morning how the Big Three could have allowed this to happen. His answer was blunt and accurate: “Nothing is more vulnerable than entrenched success.” A similar earthquake is shaking up the business of law. As recently as 10 years ago, often a lawyer was the most-reliable and easily available source of advice to executives, managers and business owners. So, the entrenched success of traditional law firms created a window for new competitors to make inroads into the dominant market position of the profession. 6

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

Business people discovered other sources of advice that often charged less to give it: • Accounting firms launched law firm divisions to go after the high-premium, high-value files of corporate clients; • A growing number of foreign-based firms began opening offices in the U.S., Canada and the U.K., often staffed with “business authorities” to help companies from their home country make the transition to doing business in America and other Western nations; • Consulting firms began hiring lawyers, not to practice law per se but to provide advice when business issues had a legal component; • Virtual “NewLaw” firms operating under a low-cost economic model started attracting day-to-day commodity work from businesses that always paid the light bill for regular law firms; and • Clients are keeping more work in-house, both as a costsaving measure and because lawyers in the general counsel’s office are more likely to know more about the business and thus offer better, more focused advice. So along with competition for actual work, lawyers are suddenly playing a game of tug-of-war with the other sources of advice open to clients that didn’t exist a decade ago.

Value v. Price Contributing to firms losing their “trusted advisor” status: Clients don’t feel they are getting sufficient value for what they are paying. A new study from Nisus Consulting finds “clients feel they are paying through the nose and that the (law firm’s) profits are excessive,” and as a result they are not getting value for money. According to LegalFutures, the survey shows that the top three factors driving client views of the law firms they use haven’t changed—strategic thinking, personal chemistry and problem solving—yet responsiveness, which lawyers believe is the most important factor, came eighth. Price also is driving clients away from seeing their attorneys as an advisor. Indeed, there is a growing reluctance on the part of executives to call outside counsel on simple, routine matters or to run something by them that isn’t a big deal. “Unless it’s really vital, I avoid calling our lawyers because it’s gotten too costly,” the general counsel of a midsized, fast-growing, high-tech company told me not long ago. “A few months ago, I phoned him with a quick question. We spoke for maybe 10 minutes and at the end of the month a $150 charge appeared on my invoice. “Our CFO tells me that the CPA firm he uses never charges for that kind of a call,” he added. “Why do law firms start running the meter every time the phone rings?” Attorneys have fallen a long way in their client’s eyes. In early October, The Global Legal Post reported that along with pricing issues, the client-attorney relationship is undergoing a fundamental shift thanks to the rise of artificial intelligence, which is changing the how firms must package and price services. As law futurist Chrissy Lightfoot has been writing for several years, “The incremental change everybody talks about I actually believe has begun to be exponential … Now is the time to actually do the deep research and the deep thinking on how it’s going to impact all of us, our livelihoods, our career, but in a positive way.” Law firms have done a lousy job of differentiating what they do by quantifying their value. Instead, they have fallen a long way in their client’s eyes in a relatively short period of time.

Recovering Lawyers can still recapture their role as the client’s trusted advisor. But it will take a different mindset and a sustained marketing effort to convince clients that the firms are sincere. Attorneys can begin the process by thinking about these six ideas:

1. Start listening to your clients, they’re trying to say what they want to do. I’ve lost track of how many business people told me in focus groups and client satisfaction interviews, “They don’t hear what I’m saying. I tell them I just need a dining room chair and they come back with six chairs, a table and a sideboard. They were at the meeting so why is this so difficult?”

2. Stop over-lawyering files. Don’t put three partners on a file when two can do the job. If I were a client, I’d explode hearing, “I asked Joe to help on the file because he needs the hours” – which I’ve overheard in hallways too many times over the years. Unless the client is the Lawyer’s Relief Charity Fund, let Joe find his own hours.

3. Don’t charge for bringing young associates to meetings. Yes, they need the experience and observing a deal being structured is a valuable learning exercise. But don’t bill for every minute of the associate’s time; training young lawyers is a cost of doing business for the law firm, not the client, and charging for the time is unprofessional.

4. Turn off the meter. Billing for a 10-minute phone call where you answer a quick question may be ethical but it’s bad business. The executive will believe that you see them as a paycheck, not as a colleague, and it only deepens the crack in the “trusted advisor” relationship.

5. Invite clients to a free “What are your plans?” meeting annually. Invite the key executives in for a lunch where they can explain how they plan to grow their business over the next few years. Tell them the meter is off, and have some of your partners attend. Just ask questions, don’t use it to tout the expertise of a tax partner the client has never met. It will absolutely generate new files.

6. Learn to get by giving. A well-written, readable blog is the best way to establish an attorney’s thought leadership and provides clients, potential clients and referral sources with things they should think about in running their company. If you give away good ideas, you’ll get files that help an executive implement them. I hope you’ll find my outlined reasons why I think lawyers may be losing their valued status as a “trusted advisor” to clients and suggestions for turning things around helpful toward increasing your overall level of success in this new year!   n

Law marketing veteran Jim Bliwas has spent most of his career working in and with law firms in the U.S. and Canada. He is senior marketing and communications strategist for Professional Services Marketing LLP, and managing director of Leaner Law Marketing Strategies. Reach him at

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018




• ESI Processing & Hosting • Data Acquisition & Forensics • Managed Document Review • Paper-based Discovery Services • Court Reporting


With offices in LA Downtown, LA Century City, Irvine and San Diego

16842 Von Karman Avenue, STE 375, Irvine, CA 92606 Office: (949) 622-0650

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

Call us for information to schedule a complimentary in-person or webinar MCLE seminar on a variety of electronic discovery topics.


SARA SIMMONS We proudly welcome Sara Simmons to our team. Sara is passionate about helping clients overcome harm inflicted by others’ improper conduct. She has tried several cases and her practice will focus on representing plaintiffs in personal injury and civil rights matters. Sara serves on the Board of Directors and as Vice President of Policy & Membership for Lawyers Club, a 1,300-member association with a mission to advance women in law and society. She is also a member of the Louis M. Welsh Chapter of the American Inns of Court, Consumer Attorneys of San Diego, and the San Diego County Bar Association. Sara earned her J.D. from California Western School of Law, where she competed nationally on the school’s trial team. She received her B.A. from University of California Santa Barbara.

After each case, we donate a portion of attorney’s fees to a nonprofit chosen by the client.




Being a True Giver When Networking by Steve Fretzin


ver the past 10–15 years there has been a dramatic increase in the number of people actively focusing on networking. Increasing competition, along with more widespread attention on building a strong network, is encouraging businesspeople to flock to networking functions in droves. This is as true for the legal profession as for any other. However, it can be an especially difficult challenge for an attorney to simultaneously balance a clogged office inbox with a devotion to developing a book of business. As we’ve established, simply “getting out there” isn’t enough in the contemporary networking scene. It’s more critical now than ever before to employ a thoughtful approach to networking in order to find success. Many attorneys I work with express discomfort at the notion of networking due to fruitless past attempts, which makes the whole endeavor seem a waste of valuable time. However, applying an efficient and effective process to networking will ensure you get optimal results from your time investment. I’ve categorized business networkers into three groups. In addition to identifying which group you might belong to, it’s important to quickly identify which group others fit into as well. Identifying which group the person you’re speaking with falls into can make or break your results.

Networker Type 1: The Taker A “Taker” is an individual who attends numerous events and racks up an imposing collection of names and business cards as a way to push appointments and close sales. Unfortunately, these sometimes-aggressive creatures can burn enough people that word “gets around” and ultimately helps to dissolve their reputations. You may even start to observe people physically positioning themselves away from a Taker at consecutive events. Although avoidance seems an appropriate strategy, the Taker should not be dismissed outright. For some people, simply obtaining new sales (however generated) is and always will be their focus. Perhaps a compassionate view toward seemingly aggressive Takers is the best way to view them. After all, many entrepreneurs require sales quotas of their employees to retain their jobs as a strategy to keep the business viable. Some Takers simply haven’t been taught the art of networking, or are confused on how best to utilize networking in order to achieve long-term results. That being said, if you can detect a Taker early on at an event, try to avoid the next step: the one-on-one meeting. This important 10

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

meeting is where you schedule a time to meet for coffee or lunch after the initial networking event where you met with a potential business connection. If you find yourself inadvertently ensnared in a meeting with a Taker, this meeting can make for a rough few hours consisting of a sales pitch for the Taker’s product or service, whether you have a need for it or not. It could also turn into a “name grab” by the new acquaintance for the names of your contacts so that he or she can make a sales pitch to them. Whatever the case, identifying and avoiding a Taker at an event or by phone before committing to a coffee meeting can save you time and emotional energy. Feel free to thank the person for his or her time and express appreciation for the invitation, but tell the “wannabe” contact directly that you’re not available and/ or not interested in his or her product or service. It’s perfectly acceptable to say you’re happy with your current vendor. The most important thing to remember when dealing with a Taker is to use whichever response best fits your situation, get it said, and move on as quickly as possible. Your ability to identify a Taker and then to remove yourself and focus on more promising prospects is a critical component of effective networking.

Networker Type 2: The Apparent Giver The Apparent Giver is the most common networker type. Apparent Givers are those people who, sometime during their careers, have heard and taken very much to heart the concept that “givers gain” or “give to get” as a mantra relating to networking. They believe they understand how to network and think of themselves as major players in the networking game, but often they miss the boat on the important component of follow-through. Where Apparent Givers stumble is in failing to execute the promises they’ve made to new contacts in an effort to gain their trust. While an Apparent Giver may actually have altruistic intentions in the beginning, promises are worthless if the networker doesn’t follow up and carry out the pledge made to the new contact. Some Apparent Givers become too distracted by other commitments and simply forget to act on their earlier promises. Some with less philanthropic motives may drop the ball when they realize the new contact may not be able to immediately reciprocate. For most people in this age of information overload, if something isn’t scheduled and written down, it probably won’t happen. The most obvious downside to turning into an Apparent Giver is that failure to follow through will tarnish your reputation if you come to be viewed as someone who doesn’t act on a pledge to a

new contact. On the receiving end of the networking exchange, Apparent Givers present a distraction from your ultimate goal of disqualifying this contact type as a potential strategic partner due to empty promises. When I meet an Apparent Giver, I always perform a small test. I ask this potential Apparent Giver to make an introduction for me to a third party to observe the person’s follow-through. If the Apparent Giver seems to stumble on the action portion of the equation, I may step in and try to help the person out with a reminder e-mail or phone call to discuss progress on the referral that was offered. After that, if my prompts don’t bear fruit, I begin to seriously question my new contact’s ability to become a referral source for me. This low-commitment testing process provides me with an opportunity to gauge the new contact’s mettle in terms of living up to promises before spending time on someone who’s unable to be an active part of my network due to inertia. The same approach can work for you.

Networker Type 3: The True Giver The ultimate networking aspiration is to become a True Giver and to seek to interact with others of this type. True Givers understand the “big picture” when it comes to networking. This networker’s mantra is “I’ll give selflessly, regardless of what’s in it for me personally.” As a True Giver, I can tell you that giving selflessly to everyone you meet is a fulfilling way of life in and of itself. The amount of good karma I’ve stockpiled over the years of true giving is impressive, if I do say so myself. I’ve built a mega network 15,000 people deep with a stellar reputation as a dependable person. The downside of being a True Giver comes down to a math problem. When I started networking many years ago, I attended three or four networking events each week. Depending on the type of event, I’d meet from three to 20 new people at each event. Early on, I filled up my calendar with anyone, including C-classified contacts, who’d meet with me. There were days I’d go to five coffee meetings back-to-back. As a newbie True Giver, I felt that in order to succeed at networking on a high level, I had to help each and every person I met for a cup of joe. However, even if I met for only three coffees each day, in a month of 20 working days, that would have amounted to 60 individuals that I was trying to assist with referrals—and I was making as many as three connections for each person I met for coffee. When I make a referral, it’s typically a call on the contact’s behalf for optimal results, which could take three minutes, minimum. All this adds up to 540 minutes of referral time, give or take, each month. That’s nine hours each month just making phone calls, in addition to the time spent meeting with the contacts in the first place—which is untenable, even for the most committed True Giver. As a busy attorney, you’re probably reading this and shaking your head in disbelief due to not just the sheer number of meetings, but the astonishing amount of time I’d spend introducing contacts to each other. Even if you had only five

short coffee meetings in a month, it might be problematic to then make one quality introduction for each. That’s why being a True Giver has to be balanced with a deliberate process. First and foremost, remember that you don’t have to meet with everyone you encounter at a networking event, as we’ve already established. By using the system outlined in Chapter 5 to qualify the best people for you to endeavor to meet and possibly refer to another connection, you’ll focus in on quality connections. Second, don’t feel obligated to promise referrals for every person you meet. Not everyone is worthy of your “endorsement” by way of an introduction to another one of the contacts you’ve nurtured. It’s fairly easy to disqualify Takers and industry nonexperts as people not to make pledges to or introduce to others. Finally, while of course the Golden Rule tells us we should be nice to everyone, you should focus your networking energy on helping those people you identify as True Givers and those who appear to have the ability to be a strategic partner over the long haul. One major key to successful networking is to qualify people as you go. This is critical because, from a temporal standpoint, you should be following up as close in time to the networking event as possible. Because all networkers are not created equal, you should make sure they’re tested and then tested again. You’ll learn more about your new contact with each interaction. For example, after meeting someone for coffee and rating her as an A, I may try to make one or two introductions for her. Along the way, I watch her reaction and reciprocation. While I don’t necessarily expect “tit for tat,” if there isn’t some level of reciprocity, I know I’ve met someone who’s probably not a True Giver, which informs my interactions surrounding this person going forward. While other networking resources might suggest that being a True Giver requires never asking the “return on investment” question, I posit that effective networking requires informed, judicious giving of your time and connections to the right people for the right reasons. After all, there just aren’t enough hours in the day to run around doing good deeds for every person who crosses our paths. On another note, I may meet a contact I rate as a C and try to make one small connection for him or her or provide some sound advice if asked. I don’t necessarily expect much from a C in return, but this is where the “networking karma” kicks in. My father always said, “If you can’t make a sale, make a friend.” This is a surefire way to build up a following of people who like you and might think about referring you down the road.  n Steve Fretzin is the Chicago area’s premiere business development coach and marketing trainer for attorneys. Fretzin is driven, focused and undeniably passionate in his pursuit to help attorneys reach their full potential. He has redefined the business development experience, transforming hundreds of attorneys into top performers. His clients are thrilled because of the growth that happens after completing his program. A typical client should expect to double or triple their book of business within 12-16 months of working with him. Learn more at Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018



Our experienced litigation teams are assisted by a support staff of professionals with diverse backgrounds. Our team is conversant in multiple languages, including Farsi, demonstrating our desire and ability to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse community. RESULTS


The San Diego personal injury team at Khashayar Law Group has received millions of dollars in compensation for our clients.

Our clients appreciate our hands-on attorneys and are reassured by their around-the-clock availability. At Khashayar Law Group, our clients can always speak directly with their attorneys at any time, day or night.

EXPERIENCE Some cases need to go to trial, and we are aggressive and experienced enough to take them to trial.

SKILL A personal injury lawyer not only depends on their knowledge of the law, but also requires the skills and experience to use that knowledge in negotiations and the courtroom.

COMPENSATION Cases of personal injury are not limited to instances of physical harm and loss. The damages can be financial, emotional or psychological, and harm your reputation. At Khashayar Law Group, we use the latest technology to test and refute evidence presented by opposing counsel to give your referrals the compensation they deserve.

GENEROUS REFERRAL FEES PAID • 858.509.1550 12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92130 400 South Melrose Drive, Suite 209 Vista, CA 92081

9454 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 615A Beverly Hills, CA 90212


Workplace Harassment: In Life as in Art! by Kit Goldman and Memo Mendez


while back, Ellen DeGeneres did a game with guests on her show. She compared harassment training videos to real life situations and challenged guests to guess the real from the fiction. One of our videos was used to stump the guests. This was well before the Harvey Weinstein, Roy Moore, Al Franken and Matt Lauer revelations and all those in the aftermath—which, sadly, and I mean that, makes our work more crucial than ever. The devastation harassment can wreak on the targets of the misconduct, brands, companies, careers is in the harsh light of day. OK, let’s play. Take a look at this situation and decide … real or fiction? Welcome to EveryCo, a fictional company in your industry. Meet Roger, a respected, likable, high-producing manager with a touchy feely style and edgy sense of humor. Everyone knows he’s got a good heart and doesn’t mean anything by his kidding around, right? Today, Roger is meeting with Margo, an employee, about a promotion. When Margo arrives, Roger’s on the phone, joking lightheartedly with a fellow manager about a gay employee. Margo’s embarrassed by the phone conversation—also by the picture on Roger’s desk of his wife on the beach in Rio. Enough said. Margo’s easily offended. That irritates Roger and raises concerns regarding the promotion. Roger speaks with her candidly, says she’s the most qualified for the opening and he wants her to succeed, but she’s uptight, makes people paranoid. He tells her she needs to loosen up, be part of the team, show up at the parties and the happy hour. After all, she’s Irish, isn’t in her DNA to hit a pub once in a while? Jokingly, he says she “…needs to liberate herself from that Catholic School upbringing.” Well, call it. Real or fiction? Actually, this is part of the opening moments of a powerful, issue-packed episode I and my training partner, Memo Mendez, perform in our “edutainment”-style harassment prevention 14

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

training, on-site and online. Think Roger’s behavior is over the top? Think it doesn’t happen except in Hollywood and Washington, D.C.? Not here, not now in our enlightened, politically correct workplaces? Please. Give me your rose-colored glasses and get me a latte with an extra shot. That kind of situation and a vast number of other high-risk scenarios happen all the time, even in world-class workplaces. It’s often unintentional, unrecognized, and unreported—until a lawsuit is filed or the EEOC comes calling. It’s a ticking litigation time bomb which can be defused via meaningful harassment education which teaches:





So—any harassment in Roger’s office? Probably. If so, Margo and Roger, like your employees and managers, have legal rights and responsibilities they need to exercise and fulfill. Do your employees and managers know how to recognize harassment and how to respond should it occur? You need them to! Here are three of the core concepts they need to understand:

Harassment is Unwelcome Conduct If it’s welcome, it’s not necessarily harassment. But welcome to whom? Roger was in a private conversation with a fellow manager when Margo walked in. Maybe the conversation had sexual or homophobic overtones, but it was welcome to the people having it. However, we work in an environment. Sound carries. Images carry. We can’t just think about what’s welcome in our direct interactions, but also to those in the work environment.

Intent vs. Impact Harassment is about impact not intent. It’s defined 100% by the impact on the other person. Intentions are irrelevant. Like the NFL. You’re offside, you get caught, there’s a penalty, whether you meant it or not. As mentioned, Roger is good hearted. He doesn’t mean anything by it. He’s just being himself. Unfortunately, unless he’s enlightened, he’s a runaway train rumbling toward a cliff with the company’s good name and resources aboard.

Consenting vs. Welcome If someone consents to something, it’s probably welcome, right? Let’s say you get off work, it’s dark, you’re in the parking lot, a stranger comes up behind you, puts a 9mm to your head, says “Give me your wallet.” You going to give it up? Darn Skippy. Did you consent? Yes. Did you welcome giving up your wallet? Of course not. The law recognizes that in the workplace people consent to things they don’t welcome for a variety of reasons. Effectively educating your workforce about harassment prevention and proper response to complaints is a great investment, especially when compared with the costs of lawsuits, settlements and compliance audits.

And if, heaven forbid, you end up in court, your efforts at prevention and proper response by management can be major factors in the outcome. Effective training can provide an affirmative defense to a harassment suit. Sadly, some employers choose not to do harassment prevention education. Here are some common reasons why: • Training will just stir things up • It’s a can of worms • Why open Pandora’s Box? • Let sleeping dogs lie On this last point, as we are seeing now, those sleeping dogs do eventually wake up. When they do, effective training is a very good thing.  n Kit Goldman and Memo Mendez are nationally acclaimed trainers, facilitators and experts with Wolf Management Consultants on legal and human issues in the workplace. Kit and Memo’s unique “edutainment” methodology harnesses the power of entertainment to enlighten and educate on dozens of workplace topics, and achieves unsurpassed levels of engagement and retention. Over the past 15 years, their entertainment-based courses have engaged 800,000+ executives, managers, and employees in a vast array of industries. They have appeared frequently as workplace experts in the national media. Call 858-638-8260 or email to learn more.


• Decades of Experience • Aggressive Representation • Personalized Care • Over 1 Billion Recovered by Our Attorneys

949.287.4931 |

500 Newport Center Drive, Suite 950 Newport Beach, CA 92660

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018


“Getting to Know You” T

he song title is famous and by taking the same approach the Tax Law Office of Luis E Vasquez is achieving the same results—getting well known and respected in the Orange County market by listening to the needs of each individual or business client. “We take the time to listen to our clients’ situations before setting up tax strategies. The office also maintains those relationships into the future by developing tax plans for the coming years. We get to know the client first and then help them in their unique situation instead of asking for money up front to just start a conversation. We do our best to get the desired results with the various tax agencies in the least amount of time compared to other firms,” says founder Luis E (Steve) Vasquez. The Tax Law Office employs three people. Vasquez, who founded the firm in 2003, his business office manager and wife, Tonya, and their assistant Henry Quinteros. Their primary practice areas are tax planning and preparation, tax resolution services, small business services including formation, planning and tax preparation as well as bankruptcy petition filing. Although their base is in Southern California, the firm handles clients in more than 20 states. “Some of our clients will move out of state for work or family but they still want us to handle their tax returns. We have to be prepared to help them no matter what state they are in so we make sure that we have that ability through our software applications and tax training,” Vasquez says. Certain states require certification to prepare taxes in that state. As an attorney, Vasquez is certified to prepare taxes for all states. Tonya Vasquez and Quinteros are certified in California and New York to prepare tax returns. The firm serves a large variety of clients, from newlywed couples to large families spanning several generations to small businesses. They are based in the Santa Ana/Irvine area near the John Wayne Airport to be centrally located to their client base, which spans as far north as LA County, as far east as San Bernadino and Riverside County, and San Diego County to the south.


Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

“We had a couple that used to live in Orange County and moved to San Francisco for work purposes. We saw a cab drop them off in front of the office, they came straight from the airport to the office for their tax appointment. They really wanted that one-on-one interaction so they flew in to see Steve and to spend the weekend with family and friends. He has the personality that keeps clients coming back to him and they trust him to make sure everything is done correctly in regards to their tax returns,” says Tonya Vasquez. The office serves a wide base of clientele including the Latino community. They are members of the Latino Tax Professionals group and go to their National Conference every year to make sure they are well prepared to handle some of the unique situations to that client base including solving tax controversies. They also assist small businesses with everything from corporate taxes, payroll taxes and sales tax issues. “We want to be an office that can handle all of your tax needs,” says Tonya Vasquez, who manages the small business clientele. The firm has plans to expand the business to provide a total package of services that will help businesses grow. “We have client businesses from so many varied industries including aerospace, video gaming, IT, construction, auto and real estate that we learn something new with each client. We want to continue that into the future.” Business reviews, like the numerous ones they’ve received on Yelp with a perfect 5-Star rating, reflect this dedication to their business clients. One client wrote, “I am currently using Steve Vasquez’s tax services for filing back Taxes for my C-Corp (for IRS and FTB). My experience with Steve have been very positive and exceeded my expectations. I realized how



2018 2016

overwhelming it is to deal with the IRS and especially the FTB. I did some research and contacted professional tax preparers, bookkeepers, tax resolution companies and other Tax attorneys. After meeting with Steve, I knew that he would be able to address my concerns and help me resolve my situation with the IRS and FTB. Plus, his knowledge of tax law is very impressive as a tax attorney. He filed my taxes, dealt with the IRS over the phone and in person. Steve was spot on in advising me what would happen next from the IRS and FTB. He truly is the ultimate and very personable professional.” –Leonard Mangalindan, Maximum Fitness Gear, Inc.

Clients dealing with the IRS or various State Tax Agencies are understandably nervous, often frightened. One of the benefits of working with an experienced tax attorney is the peace of mind knowing you are working with a top level professional in the tax industry. Knowledge and experience not only allows his firm to represent people but to become an effective legal advocate.

© christopher TODD studios

Learning Before Earning

Vasquez says, “That’s one of the reasons we offer a free one-hour consultation. I don’t look at the money right up front. We want to find the best resolution for their circumstances and provide the best value for it. A lot of tax resolution firms will say, ‘Put us on retainer and we’ll see what we can do.’ We basically say let me see what the situation is and then we’ll try to fix it accordingly. And then we can talk about money. I want to make sure that whatever the circumstances, I want to fix it as best as possible and do the best for you first.” Sometimes the client cannot be helped. Vasquez says, “It happens a lot. You owe a certain amount of money and we can help with a payment arrangement, an offer of compromise, or put you into noncollectible status. It’s best not to try to handle the IRS alone.” The honesty and open communication often causes those same clients to return for help with other legal matters. “Every once in a while a potential client doesn’t believe that I’ll invest an hour of my own time to discuss their case to see what we can do. And we invest that hour without billing the potential client. We explain that we need to find out exactly what’s going on before we bill for our services,” Vasquez says. One satisfied client says, “Steve offered me a free consultation for tax issues caused by my exhusband. Solved my problems without charging me to come in. Amazing attorney! Thank you!” – Gi. G.

From Business School to the Business of Law

Vasquez attributes much of his success to inspiration from his mother. He says she was selfemployed and often at a disadvantage because she lacked experience in business and legal matters. When he was in business school he would offer her advice. One of his professors suggested that he would make a good attorney. He says he at first laughed off the idea, but the concept stayed with him. He started getting educated on the tax and legal side of business. Those interests plus his experience helping his mother encouraged a dramatic change in career paths. After graduating in business from the University of California at Berkeley, he earned his Juris Doctor from Southwestern University, where he earned an American Jurisprudence Award. He is also now certified to appear in U.S. Tax Court. After law school he worked for one of the “Big Four” accounting firms in Los Angeles. Later he worked for a small Orange County tax preparation firm before starting his own business in 2003. His business grew through referrals and he had several hundred clients. He met his future wife in 2008 and after reviewing the business she knew that his business could grow through aggressive marketing. She developed a website and began working on other advertising, marketing and public relations efforts. She quickly became the office manager. “Now we have twice as many clients since she took over,” Vasquez says.

“It sounds like a cliché, but it’s true—to me my clients are like family. I answer my own phone most of the time—unless I’m with someone. That’s a huge thing. I’m available by e-mail and by cell phone, too. Again, I’m very hands on. In this business you need to be available for your clients at all times. There are tax matters that require immediate action such as wage garnishment, foreclosures, and I need to be available at all times.”


Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

The Tax Law Office of Luis E Vasquez team includes: Tonya Vasquez, Steve Vasquez and Henry Quinteros.

© christopher TODD studios

Enjoying Victory Regardless of the Challenge

Contact Law Offices of Luis E Vasquez 1820 E Garry Avenue Suite 108 Santa Ana, Ca 92705 (949) 756-1394  f (949) 756-1398


Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

© christopher TODD studios

Vasquez says, “I enjoy winning. When I get results and when my client is happy with those results there’s nothing like that feeling. If I don’t feel like I’ve done something at the end of the day or week then I don’t feel like I’ve done anything. When I come home Tonya can tell if I’ve had a good day or a bad day. One of the best days was when I got a $50,000 liability gone in a ten-minute conversation. I felt so good about that.” A recent case illustrates the point. A potential client came in. He had hired another firm and they called Vasquez to mitigate the situation because he had a five and a half million dollar liability. But the client faced other serious challenges. “I looked at the case and said, ‘I don’t care about the million dollars. I have to keep you from going to jail first. We have to do this in stages. We have to make sure we report everything that has to be reported and to follow all the documents to make sure you are in compliance. If you don’t report, you can be highly liable and could go to jail.’ That’s what I was looking at. I told him that once we took care of those matters we could probably get the liability reduced to $500,000 – $750,000, which we did. That put him in full compliance and significantly reduced his financial liability with the IRS. Now he’s listening to me.” Most attorneys would agree that the biggest challenge with tax law is that it is constantly changing. Tax law specialists have to be on top of a constantly shifting legal environment. “People come to us for the answers and we have to have them. Now that we have the clients we have, some of them for more than a decade, they look to us for advice on tax planning, estate planning, major purchases or things in which they need sound financial advice.” n

Compassionate & Experienced Family Law Attorneys


130 years

collective experience

 Complimentary

 130+ Years

 Certified

 We Exclusively

 Dedicated

Case Reviews

Of Collective Experience

Family Law Specialists

Practice Family Law

To Obtaining Real Results


Now Accepting Referrals 20281 S. W. Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 502-4400 |

Ten Proven Strategies to Effectively Implement the Two-tier Partner Structure by Joel A. Rose


artners in a great many law firms have recognized the value of creating a two-tier partnership structure—as opposed to the “up or out” alternative—for dealing with those long-tenured associates the firm has invested a lot of money in developing, yet do not satisfy all of the objective and subjective criteria to become equity partners. During recent consulting assignments with mid-size and larger law firms, managing partners who are keenly aware of the need to develop more effective methods to integrate nonequity partners into their firm’s career development program have expressed some frustration with the less than effective implementation of the two-tier partner system in their firms. To quote one managing partner, “It is one thing to attract and spend a lot of time and money training high-quality associates and progress them to non-equity partner status, but it is more challenging to integrate them into the firm to enable them to feel as though they are more than ‘higher paid associates.’” By the time an attorney becomes a non-equity partner, a law firm has invested heavily in time and money to train them. Non-equity partners should be among the most profitable attorneys in the firm. They have experience and the partners should assign work to them and expect high-quality work product with minimal oversight and direction. Further, they should be capable of supervising younger attorneys and managing/coordinating certain non-billable matters for the firm.

Problems Reported by Non-equity Partners Below is a composite of the key perceptions that were offered to the author by non-equity partners about their firm and its equity partners during recent consulting assignments. During personal and confidential interviews, a majority of the nonequities said that: • Equity partners were excellent lawyers and basically “good people,” except for the fact that they did not know how to supervise and develop attorneys.


Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

• They would like to become equity partners in the firm, if only the current equity partners could “get their acts together.” • The equity partners were not nearly as interested in the professional development of the non-equities as they claimed to be. They (equity partners) were more interested in the non-equities’ billable hours and collected billable hours. • During pre-employment interviews, equity partners misrepresented the type of personal and professional development the non-equities would receive. • The non-equities did not feel as though they were an integral part of the “team” serving the firm’s clients, i.e., they were told only what they had to know to complete the assigned work, rather than being told the rationale for the assignment and the broader scope of the client project. • The non-equities were among the last to know what the firm’s plans were. One common complaint echoing these concerns was that the secretaries knew more about what was happening at the firm than they did. • The non-equities were not making adequate contributions towards satisfying the client’s objectives. • A considerable amount of the work assigned to the non-equities did not provide appropriate intellectual and personal challenges. • The more experienced non-equities were not given sufficient independence and responsibility for their work and were instead micro-managed by equity partners. • Equity partners failed to provide open and honest communications and constructive feedback about the non-equities’ work. • The non-equities were not given adequate opportunities to develop and use their skills and talents in areas in which they excelled. • The equity partners talked about opportunities for partnership, but were unwilling to discuss the criteria for making equity partner or the length of the equity partner track that was likely applicable to the non-equities.

Strategies to Enhance the Integration Process Following is a list of proven strategies that we have recommended to our clients to enhance the integration of the non-equity partners into their firms. Equity partners should: Conduct personal meetings with the non-equity partners to determine:

• To what extent do the non-equities perceive (the firm’s) stated values about “open communications, and concern for quality of life and professional development” as an accurate representation about how associates are treated, professionally and personally? • Whether the non-equities believe their opportunities for advancement, professionally, personally and financially, are better than, less than, or about the same as opportunities available to their peers for performing similar kinds of work by other law firms and corporations. • Whether the non-equities believe their “total” compensation (cash and benefits) is better than, less than, or about the same as the “average” total compensation paid to their peers, for performing similar kinds of work, and demands on their time, by other law firms and corporations? • Whether the non-equities believe that the equity partners’ demands about their billable time and expectations of their total time commitment is reasonable when compared to other law practices performing similar kinds of work in private firms and corporations? • Whether the non-equities perceive the present methods followed by some equity partners for assigning work as being conducive to providing to them “stable, diverse and challenging workloads?” Allow for individual differences among the non-equities while ensuring that such differences do not interfere with collaboration at the firm.

Strive to work with the non-equities to gain an understanding of: what professional and personal objectives the latter want to achieve, and how the firm can assist the non-equities achieve their objectives while ensuring that such differences do not interfere with collaboration at the firm.

Make the non-equities’ professional and personal development a high priority. The lines of communication between the equity partners and the non-equities have to be open, reasonable and candid. For example, equity partners should invite the non-equities to attend many of the equity partners’ meetings and retreats. When the equity partners intend to discuss issues that should not be heard by the non-equities, the latter should be excused from the meeting.

Reassess the firm’s non-equity partner career development program and decide which programs are working, which ones need to be tweaked, and which ones may require major surgery.

Develop objective and subjective criteria to evaluate the non-equities’ professional performance and personal characteristics, so that the equity partners may offer constructive recommendations concerning their performance and career development.

Designate one equity partner to head a committee of equity and non-equity partners to develop a coherent approach for the professional and personal development of the non-equities, including developing strategies to address the non-equities’ concern, including enhancing the quality and frequency of communications.

Recognize that the individual lawyers’ effectiveness can be an insurmountable mode of ensuring excellence. A well-timed “great job” for a good performance is a much more effective motivator than a kick in the pants when things go poorly.

Make it clear that, while individually, the non-equities have free rein to excel, collectively they are the keepers of the firm’s future. The firm will grow if it permits its non-equities to perform for their individual benefit and for the firm. Therefore, the equity partners must provide an environment in which both the equities and nonequities will thrive.

(After the equity partners agree to the above) Integrate the above program into the firm’s career development program and present at separate meetings to the nonequity partners as well as to the associates.

Joel A. Rose is a Certified Management Consultant and President of Joel A. Rose & Associates, Inc., management consultants to the law firms based in Cherry Hill, NJ. He has extensive experience consulting with private law firms about management and organization, strategic and financial planning, lawyer compensation, the feasibility of mergers and acquisitions, and planning and conducting retreats. Mr. Rose may be contacted at

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018








“Rick is one of the best lawyers in the country. I call him every time I have any issue in Nevada and would not hesitate to refer RSO NAL INJURY PA RT N ER him any type of case ofP Eany size.” ~ C. Michael Alder, Esq., Alder Law, Los Angeles, California CAALA Past President and Former Trial Lawyer of the Year

“I recently co-counseled a serious Las Vegas injury case with Rick Harris and his law firm. Rick’s advocacy and skills are extraordinary, and were instrumental in resolving and maximizing our client’s sizable recovery.” ~ Carl Wolf, Esq., Callaway & Wolf Northern California Super Lawyers San Francisco, California

© 2016 RHLF

From Papyrus to E-mail: The History of Newsletter Marketing by Steve Klinghoffer


rom e-mail marketing to social media marketing, it seems that every year or two there is a new trend for you to keep in touch with your clients. Today, using ever-evolving technology that was nonexistent a generation ago, you can reach thousands of people with a click of a button. As new as it may sometimes seem, your content marketing strategy—whether paper, digital or both—is rooted in principles that predate Cleopatra. As the oldest known piece of direct marketing, most marketers cite a 3,000-year-old papyrus from Thebes offering a reward for a runaway slave. And long before the computer and even the printing press, Babylonian merchants advertised their products to new audiences on clay tablets. Soon after the appearance of these marketing pieces, we see some of the first known examples of newsletters: Handwritten reports from the Roman Empire and China’s Tang Dynasty kept literate adults informed about what was happening around them. But with so few people able to read and write—not to mention the lack of technology—examples such as these are few and far between until after Gutenberg’s 15th century innovation: movable type.

New technology spurred newsletter marketing The invention of the printing press hastened the spread of knowledge and information, along with raising literacy rates. It also paved the way for the mass production of not only books but also flyers, brochures, newspapers and newsletters. Publications that we might now recognize as newsletters began to appear in the 16th and 17th centuries. One example is a 17th century newsletter distributed in England featuring accounts of events and people from the colonies. By 1704, a publication considered the United States’ first known newsletter appeared, The Boston News-Letter—a single sheet printed weekly that contained information from England of interest to Colonial Americans. These early newsletters evolved into what we today know as newspapers. Printed for 72 years, The Boston NewsLetter is considered the first continuously published newspaper in North America.

Early newsletters paved the way for content marketing While the term “content marketing” traces its use to 2001, we can find the first examples of content marketing in the 26

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

mid-1700s. For example, in 1734, Benjamin Franklin began publishing Poor Richard’s Almanack  to promote his printing business. He did this by printing weather predictions, recipes, trivia and other advice people considered valuable, selling 10,000 copies a year. Later examples of content marketing include the following: • In 1882, the Edison Electric Lighting Company Bulletin helped spread the word about the benefits of electric lighting. • In 1888, Johnson & Johnson launched a publication, Modern Methods of Antiseptic Wound Treatment, one of the company’s three publications that provided useful information to physicians and the larger medical community. • In 1900, Michelin launched the Michelin Guide, a publication that helped motorists maintain their automobiles and find lodging while traveling. The iconic red-covered guide is still published today. • Adapting to new technology in the 1930s, Proctor and Gamble launched radio programs featuring entertainment and valuable information for housewives. The term “soap opera” originated with these radio programs. The early 1900s saw a new flourishing of newsletters, such as  The Kiplinger Letter, which forecasts financial trends for its readers and is currently read by 5 million people each month. Throughout the 1900s, newsletters covering myriad topics, from business and industry to farming and fashion, could be found.

The Internet changed life— and newsletter marketing Just as the birth of the Internet in the 1990s transformed life as it had been known for centuries, it also revolutionized marketing. E-mail actually predates the Internet, as does the first e-mail marketing message, which was sent in 1978 by a Digital Equipment Corp. employee name Gary Thuerk. He sent an e-mail blast to 400 recipients that resulted in $13 million in sales. This is also considered to be the first spam message. With the 1996 launch of the first web-based e-mail service, Hotmail, what began as a communications tool for business professionals and academics turned into a common means of personal communication. This innovation made free e-mail available to anyone with access to the Internet, even if only from a library or business center. Smart marketers seized on the

newsletter marketing opportunities of this new technology. Large companies and small professional firms alike use e-mail marketing to send eNewsletters to clients and prospects on a regular basis. While some eNewsletters contain links back to a company website to increase web traffic, many more are content-rich publications full of information. Like the paper newsletters that came before them, these eNewsletters have helped turn prospects into customers, or one-time customers into repeat customers. E-mail technology continues to evolve. For example, in the mid-2000s, e-mail service providers began allowing senders to receive feedback. As a result, marketers today can measure open rates, clicks and other data, helping them to hone and improve their e-mail marketing to better meet their needs and those of their audiences. In 2015, an estimated 2.5 billion people were using e-mail, though 50% of all e-mails sent were believed to be spam. These figures underscore the importance of sending newsletter marketing e-mails that contain information useful and valuable to the reader.

The lasting value of newsletters The handwritten pieces circulated in the Roman Empire and the mass e-mails sent today share several characteristics: Chief among them, they contain valuable information that readers want to absorb. It’s this key characteristic that has made

newsletter marketing a successful tool throughout history. Newsletters not only inform but they also position the sender as an expert in a specific field. As a newsletter marketer for more than 30 years, I know this to be true. I started in this business helping accounting firms successfully market their practices with a monthly accounting newsletter that is still published today, in both print and digital formats. Today, our services have expanded to help accounting, legal, financial, medical, dental and physical therapy practices market themselves with print and electronic newsletters—using modern technology and long-standing, tried-and-true marketing principles. The next time you click “send” on your e-mail newsletter, know that you are following a long line of content marketers that includes Benjamin Franklin, the Edison Company and even the first soap opera.  n Steve Klinghoffer, along with his wife Lori, founded WPI Communications, Inc., in 1984. After practicing law for almost ten years, Steve directed his entrepreneurial interests toward helping professionals market their practices through a wide range of editorial-based tools, such as client and patient newsletters, referral-generating newsletters and Web site content. Over the last 33-plus years, Steve has worked with thousands of physicians, dentists, physical therapists, accountants, attorneys, financial planners and other professionals to help them build their practices. For additional information, please visit:

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018


Overcoming the

Isolation Of Being a Solo Practitioner by Terrie S. Wheeler

Do you ever feel a little isolated as a solo practitioner? Like you’re hanging out, doing all the right things to market and grow your practice, yet the results just aren’t happening? If you’re in a small firm or a solo practitioner, isolation can be debilitating, particularly when you are trying to build a “firm” mentality with your clients and prospects. Plus, I have to admit, at least in Minnesota, weather does become a factor. You were planning to attend that morning networking event, and you hear on the morning news that traffic is at a standstill and your trip “in” will take another hour. Guess what? I’d cancel too! I am simply acknowledging that you need to approach your marketing efforts with commitment, but also with a degree of flexibility. So as you are sitting atop your perch today, looking out at the world, what can you do to propel your practice to the next level? 28

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

Use Technology as a Solo Practitioner Between email, Skype, GoToMeeting, and other technologies, you can bridge the gap into the outside world. At PSM we have clients across the country. We definitely feel more connected to our clients when we can talk “live” with them on Skype.

Spend Time on LinkedIn Truly—LinkedIn is one of your best marketing tools. You can sit in your office and connect with your contacts. You can comment on posts they have made, and post links to articles and websites you find interesting. In addition, you can check out the ability to answer questions prospective clients have about your area(s) of practice, or to conduct advanced searches for people YOUR contacts could introduce you to.

Write a Blog Content is king, and the best way for you to share your content is to regularly post blogs to your website, then promote them on social media. Clients want to see that you have done what they need, so don’t be afraid to share your expertise—it’s what makes a client hire you!

Schedule a Lunch Everyone has people to whom they have said, “Let’s get together sometime soon!” Well, now’s the time to act! Take your in-office time and reach out to a couple of those people to schedule lunch or coffee; now or after the holidays.

Develop your Marketing Plan for 2018 Rather than wondering where your next client will come from or why the phone isn’t ringing, take action. Develop a proactive marketing plan for your practice by identifying your most important target audiences, what makes you unique and differentiates you from other lawyers, who your best contacts are (referral sources and prospective clients), and what your overall objectives are for next year. How much money do you want to earn? What practice areas offer the greatest growth for you? Once you have answered these questions, you can find out how to implement your plan by reviewing The Four Pillars of Marketing—best practices for lawyers who want to grow!

Focus on your Referral Sources Take a look at your clients from 2017. Go through each client you would like to do more business with or who was what you consider to be an A-Level client, and identify how you got the

client. As you know, most of your new business comes to you from referrals. Who were your best referral sources in 2017? How can you continue to engage with these people and keep your expertise top of mind with them? Nurturing relationships with referral sources offers a very productive and efficient way to spend some well-earned marketing time. It’s a lot easier to market to someone who has access and entrée into possibly hundreds of prospective clients for you versus trying to attract one new individual or business client. If you’re a family lawyer, build relationships with therapists and financial advisors. If you’re a business lawyer, get to know your local CPAs and bankers. You get the idea! If you find yourself perching on a proverbial branch as a solo practitioner, wondering what the future holds for you, now is the time to take action by implementing the ideas above. Remember that over the holidays is a great time to reach really busy people. They’re likely perching too!  n Terrie S. Wheeler, MBC, is the founder and president of Professional Services Marketing, LLC. Terrie has worked with lawyers and law firms throughout the country to help them develop targeted strategies to develop new business. She teaches marketing and client service at two law schools, and serves as Vice Chair of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board. Terrie loves talking and brainstorming with lawyers! There are numerous free webinars for lawyers on our website, You can also reach Terrie at 651-295-5544, or at

Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018


Ethical Issues in Using Social Media by Jeffrey Jacobs

Why should lawyers care about social media, and whether they are using it ethically? Obviously, lawyers should be concerned about compliance with ethical requirements in everything they do, but there may be some hidden ethical pitfalls in the use of social media about which they need to be aware, both on behalf of themselves and their clients. The use of social media is everywhere – your associates and partners are using it, your competitors are using it, and your clients are using it and want you to use it, too. The effective (and ethical) use of social media falls squarely within every lawyer’s duty of competence, as set forth in ABA Model Rule 1.1 and California Rule of Professional Conduct (CRPC) 3-110. Comment 8 to the ABA rule provides that “[t]o maintain the requisite knowledge and skill, a lawyer should keep abreast of changes in the law and its practice, including the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology, engage in continuing study and education and comply with all continuing legal education requirements to which the lawyer is subject.” (Emphasis added.) About 80 percent of Fortune 500 companies have a Facebook page, 83 percent of Fortune 500 companies have Twitter accounts, and the content is all discoverable. That is an important thing to keep in mind when advising a client on creating a social media policy, regulating who can post to or must review the content on such accounts, or preserving social media evidence when necessary to help implement a client’s litigation hold. Providing such advice not only implicates the ethical duty of competency, but also requires lawyers to consider ethical requirements when seeking the social media evidence of opposing parties. Whichever side of a matter you are on, information contained on social media and in electronic communications can be very helpful in all sorts of litigation contexts, from family law (divorce and custody) proceedings to personal injury/insurance, trade secret theft, intellectual property, non-compete, employment discrimination, and even commercial dispute matters. Keep in mind that although lawyers may view public areas of social media accounts, communicating with an unrepresented person through social media may be problematic (ABA Rule 4.3), as is “friending” a party, witness or juror under false pretenses in order to access non-public information (ABA Rule 4.1(a)). As San Diego Bar Ethics Opinion 2011-2 stated, “[the] rules bar an attorney from making an ex parte friend request of a represented


Attorney Journal Orange County | Volume 142, 2018

party … We have further concluded that the attorney’s duty not to deceive prohibits him from making a friend request even of unrepresented witnesses without disclosing the purpose of the request.” And although employers are more and more frequently searching social media in connection with background checks on potential employees, they need to be aware that uncovering information, even inadvertently, about an applicant’s age, race, religion, national origin, disability or other characteristics may give rise to a claim that such information was used inappropriately in making hiring or other employment-related decisions. In addition to using social media in their representation of clients, lawyers and law firms typically have websites, Facebook and LinkedIn pages, and Twitter accounts of their own, and need to be aware that such content may be considered regulated attorney communications. Under CRPC 1-400, a “communication” is “any message or offer made by or on behalf of a member [of the bar] concerning the availability for professional employment of a member of a law firm directed to any former, present, or prospective client…” Accordingly, the content of such pages and accounts may need to be retained for a period of time that varies by state (for example, two years in California, one year in New York). In addition, when considering what to put on a Facebook page or other social media account, lawyers need to keep in mind their ethical duties of candor (ABA Rule 3.3, CRPC 5-200(B); maintenance of client confidences (ABA Rule 1.6(c), CRPC 3-100), and duty to supervise (ABA Rule 5.3(c)), for it should go without saying that subordinates cannot be permitted to engage in conduct that lawyers could not perform themselves under the rules of professional conduct. Lawyers should also be wary of the distinction between providing legal information versus legal advice through social media, lest they run afoul of restrictions on unauthorized practice of law outside the jurisdiction of their state licensure (ABA Rule 5.5) or inadvertently create an attorney-client relationship. These are just some of the ethical issues that can arise in lawyers’ use of social media, and readers are encouraged to attend CLEs on the topic for a fuller treatment of these and related issues.  n Jeffrey Jacobs, Esq., CEDS, is a senior counsel and senior director of litigation readiness consulting for Epiq. Learn more at:



We’ll help you put your best foot forward. From logos and brochures to websites, strategy, writing and beyond, we’ve got you covered!

Jenny Strauss, Partner & Brand Strategist 215-460-0835

Ideas, Design, Marketing … Powerful Results!

View our portfolio at



Post Falls, ID PERMIT NO. 32

Profile for Attorney Journals

Attorney Journal, Orange County, Volume 142  

Attorney Journal, Orange County, Volume 142

Attorney Journal, Orange County, Volume 142  

Attorney Journal, Orange County, Volume 142