FlightCm African Aviation
Edition 144 | OCTOBER 2020
MAF :
HOW IT BROUGHT AIR SERVICE TO AFRICA
WAMS HELIEMERGENCY SERVICE AFRICAN AIR FORCES NEED DIGITAL SOLUTIONS GEN. DES BARKER ON THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN TACTICS! United States Dollars $3.50 | South African Rands R39.50 | Kenyan Shillings KES 300.00 | Nigerian Naira NGN600.00 1 PRICE:FlightCom Magazine
Better solutions and services for your World. From state-of-the-art trip support to payment card programmes and reliable into plane fuel delivery, MH Aviation Services, based in Johannesburg, is Africa’s most innovative aviation services partner. Join the 8,200 flight departments who depend on our bespoke global solutions and local expertise to take their success to new heights. Fuel | Trip Support | Card and Reward Programmes | Logistics | Planning
Discover our Flight Operation Solutions 24/7 Support: +27 82 940 5437 Office: +27 11 609 0123 tsopsafrica@wfscorp.com mhaviation.co.za
CONTENTS
TABLE OF 08 12 18 24 29 30 33 34 36 37 38 48
Publisher Flyer and Aviation Publications cc Managing Editor Guy Leitch guy@flightcommag.com Advertising Sales Wayne Wilson wayne@saflyermag.co.za Layout & Design Emily-Jane Kinnear
ADMIN: +27 (0)83 607 2335
OCTOBER 2020 EDITION 144
Bush Pilot - Hugh Pryor Airlines - Mike Gough Defence - Darren Olivier MAF Founder Stuart King dies IATA - Quarantines Wilderness Search & Rescue Atlas Oil Charter Directory Alpi Flight School Listing AEP AMO Listing AME Directory The Battle of Britain Back Page Directory
© F lightCom 2020. All rights reserved worldwide. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronically, mechanically, photocopied, recorded or otherwise without the express permission of the copyright holders.
TRAFFIC: +27 (0)81 039 0595 ACCOUNTS: +27 (0)15 793 0708
A NOTE FROM
THE EDITOR:
A
has traditionally had the world’s weakest airline industry. Thanks to the legacy of stateowned airlines with concomitant political interference and protection, and the lack of liberalisation and open skies, Africa’s airlines have been sheltered children. It is therefore ironic that African airlines are now the best placed to recover from the Covid-19 pandemic. African governments have been more relaxed than many European countries in their response to the pandemic, and some counties such as Tanzania have done their best to ignore it entirely. Thus, African airlines are, broadly speaking, returning to the sky sooner than their European and American counterparts. Additionally, the benefits of state ownership means that African airlines can just put out their hands for shareholder bailouts which are far more readily available than having to scrounge money from banks, or private sector investors. However, we must not lose sight of the massive social, financial and economic impact the pandemic has had on Africa. Mr Mikail Houari, Airbus’s President for Africa and the Middle East, points out that the grounding of flights has resulted in losses, not just to the airlines, but also to sectors dependant on aviation such as tourism and trade. Houari points out that Covid-19 has also demonstrated the intrinsically vital nature of aviation. Due to poor ground-based transport modes, such as effective road and rail links, aircraft have been the only means of transport capable of delivering essential time-sensitive cargo. Thus, the FRICA
United Nations opened a humanitarian transport hub at Addis Ababa to move supplies and aid workers across Africa to fight the coronavirus pandemic. Prior to this pandemic, the outlook for air transport in Africa was positive. Airbus’s Global Market Forecast (GMF) for 2019 predicted that passenger traffic to and from Africa would increase by 5.4% yearly over the next twenty years. This was in line with the International Air Transport Association (IATA) predictions that Africa would be the second-fastest-growing aviation market in the 20 years leading to 2037, with passenger numbers expected to more than double — to 334 million — by then. Over the past twenty years, out of the 20 top worldwide economic performers, more than ten were African economies. The increased demand for air transport is a reflection of that growth. The impact that the aviation industry has had on the sustainable development of Africa cannot be overstated, and governments across the continent are leveraging the industry’s ability to bring about economic transformation. Houari points out that aviation not only gets people moving, but it also fosters regional integration, creates jobs and enables domestic, intra-African and global trade. According to IATA, the African air transport industry directly supports 6.2 million jobs and contributes $56 billion to the continent’s regional GDP. To generate further activity and improve the state of air transport in Africa, governments, regional bodies, and financial institutions have developed air transport-specific initiatives such as the Single
African Air Transport Market (SAATM). The African continent has also made significant strides towards the expansion and improvement of airport infrastructure and air traffic management. Countries such as Morocco, Niger, Senegal, South Africa, Uganda and Ethiopia are expanding existing airports or building new ones. Aerospace manufacturing is also happening on the continent. In South Africa, Morocco and Tunisia, for example, more than 35 African companies are involved in the manufacturing of Airbus commercial aircraft in areas such as design, engineering, and the production of aerodynamic, structural, communications, control surface, electronics and
The impact that the aviation industry has had on Africa cannot be overstated cabin items. Such activities have enabled the creation of centres of learning, knowledge development, and innovation, thus supporting the creation of a pool of highly skilled aviation talent for the continent. Although the real impact of the pandemic on Africa’s airline industry is still difficult to gauge, the Covid-19 crisis poses a threat not only to the current African aviation value chain, but also to the tremendous progress made to improve the entire airtransport ecosystem on the continent. Considering the inherent and extensive nature of aviation and the boundless possibilities and opportunities it offers Africa’s socio-economic 6
FlightCom Magazine
development - it seems necessary for all stakeholders to strongly support the sector. Indeed, the ability of Africa’s aviation industry to recover from this global crisis will depend on the level of collaboration and support invested by all stakeholders to mitigate the effects of this unprecedented crisis. Support from governments and development finance institutions will be particularly critical, be it with direct financial support, loan guarantees, or tax relief. We already see governments in Senegal, Cote d’Ivoire, Rwanda and Uganda taking actions. For airlines, being adaptable will be crucial; with the expected decrease in passenger numbers, airline fleet composition and aircraft versatility will be put to the test. Unsurprisingly Airbus points out
that more than ever, it will be about flying the right aircraft at the right time, with flexible approaches to business models while operating economically efficient aircraft. Post-Covid will require tailored market and fleet strategies. Furthermore, concerted effort with airlines, airports, and the authorities will be required to reassure people who rely on air travel. Airbus points out that renewed air circulates in the cabin every 2-3 minutes through highly efficient HEPA filters that remove 97-99.95% of microbes, viral and bacterial particles from the air, including Covid-19. With every crisis comes opportunity, and the current climate might encourage better collaboration and integration in Africa. African carriers could choose to join forces, thus increasing competitiveness, creating regional hubs, and ultimately speeding up the full implementation of initiatives such as SAATM. Airbus concludes that aviation connects people, countries and cultures, generates revenue, and improves the livelihood of millions of people. When the stakes are so high and the returns even higher, a successful and sustainable aviation industry in Africa should not be viewed as an option, but rather, as a vital sector, with immeasurable value.
A Message to All Our Loyal Readers The Covid-19 pandemic has thrown the aviation publication business into turmoil. QUESTION:
WHY CAN I NOT FIND SA FLYER ON THE SHOP SHELVES AND IN MY POST BOX?
ANSWER:
T HE COVID-19 PANDEMIC HAS EFFECTIVELY FORCED ALL THE AVIATION MAGAZINES TO STOP PRINTING. BUT THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT THERE IS NOW FAR MORE TO ENJOY!
C
OVID-19 has brought the entire print publication industry to its knees. One of the impacts of this has been the closure of our retail distribution to shops and our inability to deliver subscriptions. For this reason, we have moved to a purely digital offering. Our new value proposition to you, our loyal reader: We now provide not just the magazine, but 3 different ways for you to get your flying fix – and not just monthly – but with new material every day! 1. Our all new digital pdf magazine - available for free on our website www.saflyer.com 2. Our Facebook page - with by far the biggest aviation following in Africa 3. Our brand-new state of the art website - visit www. saflyer.com And best of all! We provide all three of these platforms for free!!
The core our offering remains the magazines, which, as purely digital PDF publications use an excellent ‘e-zine’ reader. Click on: https://issuu.com/saflyermagazine for your free copy of SA Flyer and FlightCom. This very
powerful yet easy to use e-zine reader allows us to fully exploit the wonderful opportunities created by digital publishing in linking videos to our articles. And we have made the font and layout much easier to read on a tablet or computer monitor. So now – not only is SA Flyer and FlightCom available for free – it offers so much more! Our means of reaching our readers may have changed, but at SA Flyer and FlightCom we remain committed to our core principles of quality journalism and insightful thought-leadership. Our key objective is to inform and entertain our readers, which we do thanks to the world-class contributors we have nurtured. These include: •
Peter Garrison’s unrivalled insights into aerodynamics and accidents
•
Jim Davis’s years of instructing experience
•
George Tonking’s unique helicopter insights.
•
At the same time we are nurturing young writers such as Johan Walden and the wonderful Dassie Persaud van der Westhuizen who qualified as an architect and then became a flight attendant to fund her flying training – all the way to the cockpit of an Airbus A320.
We are also the only magazine to do hands-on ‘from the cockpit’ flight tests where we actually fly the aircraft. And we bring our readers invaluable information, such as where to get the cheapest fuel – thus saving you thousands of Rands! We live in challenging times and it will be extremely interesting to see what the aviation publication market looks like in a year’s time. But in the meanwhile, we are confident that we are still by far the most liked and respected aviation magazine in Africa. Thank you for your support!
Guy Leitch
BUSH PILOT HUGH PRYOR
ABDUL AZIZ
I have never thought of myself as being much of a magician, even less a ‘medium’ or spiritual intermediary, but there is a customs officer in Algeria who certainly thinks that I am one or possibly even both.
T
reason he gave me this completely undeserved reputation was because he had been to Ethiopia and so had I. Abdul Aziz was there in the course of his duties, ‘something to do with drugs,’ he murmured, and left it at that. I was there during the great Ethiopian Famine of 1985/6/7, flying for the International Committee of the Red Cross. Abdul Aziz was a compact little man with a thin moustache, which he obviously spent time on. 8
HE
FlightCom Magazine
The grey at his temples looked too good to have been put there by his creator. His uniform was always immaculately creased. The bill of his cap had been cut back so that he could look down his nose at people, in spite of his abridged stature. His badges of rank were worn with intent and beamed his authority to all and sundry. Given a different time and place, he could have been a world leader and probably a very dangerous one, too. As things turned out, he rose to be the chief of customs at Hassi Messaoud, the oil capital of Algeria, in North Africa.
His position had considerable influence on the local economy and his services were therefore much in demand by the many foreign oil-related companies which did business in the town. He had a reputation for being particularly hard on people and organisations who tried to find alternative methods of moving materials in and out of the country, without going through
He could have been a world leader and probably a very dangerous one, too the normal customs procedures. The basic principle by which he lived was that if you were straight with him, he would be straight with you. Okay, it might take a little longer, but if he caught you trying
BUSH PILOT HUGH PRYOR to bypass the system, you stood a very good chance of not receiving your goods at all. And, of course, the next time you came through, Abdul Aziz would have no reason to suspect that you were telling him the truth, since you had lied to him before, and so you would have to jump through ALL the hoops, some of them more than once, before you would get your things out of customs. This could delay your project considerably and with an oil rig costing upwards of $25 000 per day, even sitting idle, it was definitely worth your while to make friends with Abdul Aziz. Some time later I was relieved of my duties by the company which I had been working for, for the previous fourteen years. The ‘relieving’ smarted
Everybody thought that Pryor had left the fuel caps off quite a bit, partly because it was based on baseless accusations and partly because it was carried out on the telephone, while I was on leave. But that’s
another story, with which I may possibly bore you at a later date. Be warned! Almost simultaneously with my firing, another company offered me employment. I have been blessed several times this way and it confirms all I have heard about ‘It’s not what you know, it’s who you know’. The new company was interested in me because they were picking up several of the contracts previously served by my ex-employers. One of these was with a very large American construction company, who had landed an enormous contract to 10
FlightCom Magazine
build some big compressor stations on one of the gas pipelines feeding North African gas, from the middle of the Sahara, under the Mediterranean sea, into Europe. I had the honour of bringing the first company aircraft into Hassi Messaoud, from Malta. I have to say that the aircraft was not, by any stretch of the imagination, a pristine example of its marque. Just because Twin Otters tend to visit the more remote corners of the world does not mean that they have to be shabby. ‘Charlie-Alpha’ was shabby. Twin Otters don’t see sophisticated airports very often, but that doesn’t
mean that the fuel tanks should leak. ‘CharlieAlpha’s’ tanks leaked so badly that I once left a fiftymetre contrail of fuel behind me as I flew off to a place called Zina, to the south of Hassi Messaoud, in Algeria. Of course, everybody thought that Pryor had left the fuel caps off, but they were wrong. I have only ever done that once in my long career, and this was not the occasion. When we landed at Zina, the caps were in place and a continuous stream of fuel was pouring from the belly of the aircraft. So, obviously, we had to make a quick turn-around and get back to Hassi Messaoud before all the fuel leaked out. Luckily the trip was only 34 miles and there was a good black-top road all the way, in case the split in the tank got any bigger. No, ‘Charlie-Alpha’ was a bit of an embarrassment, to be honest, and so it was just as well that it was dark when we landed that first time. Being our first visit with the new company’s aircraft, there were various formalities which had to be complied with, before operations could commence, and Abdul Azziz was, of course, heavily involved. He was actually standing there, on the darkened apron, in full uniform, with the arc lights glittering off his insignia, as we taxied in and parked the aircraft. We shut down the engines and all the
remaining systems which still worked and while my colleague finished up the paperwork, I opened the cockpit door and jumped down onto the ground. When Abdul Azziz saw who the driver was, he strode over with outstretched hands to meet me. “Hello Abdul!” I said, grasping his hand, “Nice to see you again.” “Welcome to Hassi Messaoud, Captain!” he said, shaking my hand vigorously. “So you bring a new aircraft with you this evening.” “Well, Abdul, it’s not really new exactly. New to Algeria, yes. But it’s quite an old aeroplane, twentynine years old, in fact.” “But it is bigger than the ones you were flying for your previous company, isn’t it?”
“No, Abdul, it’s the same type, a De Havilland DHC-6 dash 300. It’s exactly the same as theirs.” I was tempted to add that theirs was probably in a lot better shape than ours, but managed to restrain myself.
“But you have bigger engines in yours, don’t you?” “No, Abdul, we’ve got the Pratt and Whitney Canada PT-6A dash 27s in ours, and so have they.” “Yes but you must have tweaked yours a bit, or something, surely.” Abdul insisted. “No, Abdul, I promise you, we’ve got the same type of plane as they have. What makes you think ours is different?” “Well your Fuel Control Units cost $22 000 each.” “Yes, that’s right. I have the invoices with me, but I assume you already have them.” “Well your previous employer’s Fuel Control Units only cost $150!” Abdul suddenly realised he was onto a major scam, and he went for the throat. Two of the aircraft were impounded, pending the payment of $1 900 000 in back tax. And, guess what? I got the blame! What a pleasure!
PETER GARRISON’S NEW BOOK! Acclaimed SA Flyer (and Flying magazine) columnist Peter Garrison has just released a book of noteworthy accident analyses, and lessons to be learned, from his ‘Aftermath’ series. He writes: “I’ve put a bunch of slightly used but still serviceable Aftermaths into a book called “Why? Thinking About Plane Crashes”, which is for sale on Amazon Books as both a Kindle ebook and a paperback.” Guy Leitch highly recommends it; “I downloaded it for just US$5.75 on kindle and the profound insights to be gained from these accidents will make us all better pilots. From the risks of ‘taking a look’ at dubious VFR conditions, to showing-off in front of our friends, there are 32 invaluable lessons. This book should be part of every pilot’s prescribed reading list.”
FlightCom Magazine
11
AIRLINES MIKE GOUGH
THE NEAREST ADEQUATE AIRPORT The choice between an adequate airport, as opposed to a suitable airport depends essentially on one’s level of desperation of getting on to the ground, what risks are involved and then the consequence management of dealing with the result of one’s decision.
L
assume we are in the cruise, and everything is normal. Anyone who has ploughed through the Airbus Computer Based Training aircraft technical course should have raised a smile at that one… However. The unexpected happens. It could be as simple as a Level One warning – simply requiring crew awareness, for example the SATCOM might
12
ET’S
FlightCom Magazine
have gone on strike. Maybe a Level Two warning pings into our attention sphere. We would sit on our hands, take a look at it, discuss it, and then do something about it. It is unlikely we would be considering a suitable airport to divert to, although it may be a possibility. ‘Suitable’ being engineering capability, company representation, onward connections and so forth. The Level Three has our absolute and undivided attention.
This requires ‘immediate’ crew action. A fire warning, dual hydraulic failure, smoke in the cabin or the most extreme, all engine failure. Now, we are only concerned with an adequate airport where weather, runway length and strength are all that matter. We are trained to leap into (appropriately measured) action and deal with the situation using all available resources. As soon as we have (hopefully) managed to stop the bleeding, we then need to assess the next, most appropriate course of action. As one would probably have an elevated pulse rate and possibly that kick of adrenaline through one’s system, the chance of an uncoordinated and random decision-making process is a distinct possibility. Being the fatally flawed human creatures that we are, we are taught that our mental processes are sometimes our own worst enemy. Confirmation Bias leads
Use the TFOReDEC process to consult - not argue.
us to seek only that information that supports our current mindset and leads us to discount alternate information. Heuristics assist our brains to shortcut the situation, and literally leap to a conclusion. We have seen something similar and thus we will do X. This has advantages and some pretty obvious disadvantages. Thus, as much as our vivid thinking patterns can lead us down the garden path, the same thought processes respond in a gratifyingly child-like manner to simple mnemonics to get us out of a mental hole that we might find ourselves in. We can probably all recall our elementary flight training (something I find myself busy with almost full time now, but we’ll get to that), and those epic complexities of dealing with a Cessna 172 immediately before takeoff. Variations of these themes exist throughout the ab initio training environment. Immediately after start, “ROAMFRIES” (RPM, Oil pressure, Ammeter, Mixture, Flaps up, Radios, Instruments, Electrics, Safety), tells us the actions
and checks to accomplish when the quiet turns noisy and rattley. “Too Many Pilots Go Fly In Heaven Early” – although not strictly a mnemonic, reminds us of the vital first letters to initiate certain before takeoff checks. As far as single crew checklist philosophy goes, when a single-crew operation is literally in motion, one cannot safely consult a written checklist, while paying attention to the all- important ‘Aviate, Communicate, Navigate’ hierarchy of aviation needs. Thus, the simple mnemonic can assist with relatively complex tasks. In my airline training, we have been taught to use ‘TFOReDEC’ as our go-to mnemonic when we need to declutter our decision-making process and consider all our options. Most airlines around the world use a similar process to assist crews to use a logical sequence as a Decision Making Model (DMM). The ‘thinking’ part: Time. Do we have enough time to complete this
FlightCom Magazine
13
AIRLINES MIKE GOUGH
process? How much time do we have? Normally fuel related, although many factors can affect this assessment. Facts. What are the actual, underlying, causal facts of this situation? Are we both on the same page in terms of understanding this issue? Options. What options – any and all options – are available to us? Continue. Turn back. Divert. Descend. Enter a holding pattern. Risks and Benefits of these various options. Play Devil’s Advocate and the ‘what if’ game to test the strength and weaknesses of each option. The lower-case e is experience. Have we seen this before, either in the simulator or on the line? If so, what did we do and what was the outcome? Then comes the ‘acting’ part – putting the decision into action: Decide. Choose the most appropriate option / course of action. Execute. Task delegation. Who will do what, and when it will be done. Check. What have we missed? Is the decision achieving the desired outcome? Start the TFOReDEC again. Around two years ago, while I was undergoing the annual requirement to be observed by a 14
FlightCom Magazine
company Check Captain on a twosector flight to assess how well we are complying with Airbus and company procedures, I had a minor issue that I had to take care of. Generally, something is bound to go south during a check flight… After push-back, with both engines now running, the ground
it came from was somewhat irrelevant, but we could not depart in this state. Options. We could pull back into the bay, shut down both engines, connect the airbridge, open the door and retrieve the rope. Or, we could shut down number 1 engine and open the door in the lane. Or, we could
Check Captain is also part of the decision making team.
engineer informed me that we had a green rope dangling out of
door 1 Left – the main entry door - and what am I going to do about it? Time. We had plenty of time – engines running just meant we would start using our tankering fuel for the return sector from Maputo, but we could uplift some of their expensive fuel if need be. Facts. Well, apparently there was a piece of rope hanging out the bottom of the door…where
simply disarm the door with both engines running and open it.
Risks and benefits. Option 1, minimal risks, but would definitely use some fuel reserves and we would lose our departure slot. Option 2, less ‘alarm factor’ for the passengers due to reduced noise when we opened the door, but caution in terms of losing one’s footing while retrieving the rope without the safety of a connected airbridge. Option 3, the quickest and simplest, but
possibly the noisiest and even though risk was relatively low, it was the riskiest. Experience. Had we seen or done this before? No. Decide. I included the three of us in this brief discussion, as the Check Captain is still a usable resource on the flight deck. Option 3 it was. Execute. I decided the additional crew member would firmly hold the Purser’s belt while he knelt at the open door, and also double-check the door was disarmed before opening it. A quick announcement to the passengers about a sudden increase in jet-noise, and the first officer made a radio call to Ground to let them know why we hadn’t commenced the taxi. The increase in noise level took us all by surprise and rendered any verbal communication between us hopeless. As we had properly briefed, additional discussion was unnecessary. In ten seconds it was done, and it turned out to be part of the escape slide housed in the door bustle. I got a few Noddy points after the check ride for using what was then a relatively new procedure. Allow me to look at the events of this year in terms of our Decision Making Model. In
February, the entire industry was fat and happy, in the cruise and not only was everything normal, but the future for all of us was looking positively rosy. Then the shit-show called COVID-19 turned the entire world upside down. Airlines around the world were grounded in a flash, and tens of thousands of aircrew
students are able to get through our borders, I can continue for some time to come in the lifestyle to which my family and I are accustomed. Many are not so lucky. Facts. The entire aviation industry globally is that allegorical battered boxer on his knees, reeling from a sucker
I expect this coming week to be my last in my airline were suddenly the target of bean counters’ attempts to maintain some form of solvency. For the vast majority of crew in this country, the unexpected last salary was the end of March. Retrenchments abounded. As I write this, I expect this coming week to be my last in my airline where I have made my career for the last 23 years. Time. I am fortunate that I not only have holding fuel (financial resources), I also have a significant business in my flight school. Provided the pipeline of
punch out the blue. How long it takes for him to stand again and start ducking and weaving is the subject of much conjecture. At this point, the facts get a bit foggy… Options. For a lot of people, an alternate career is suddenly a necessity. Any employment in the worst recession in the history of the planet would probably be an option – much like that adequate airport. Some may be lucky enough to be re-employed by what is left of the respectable carriers, worldwide. Others are
FlightCom Magazine
15
AIRLINES MIKE GOUGH
going to have to hold for about 18 to 24 months and that will take a heck of a lot of holding fuel. Risks and benefits. I would wager that a lot of the more senior crew members exiting the flight deck at this point will not be coming back at all in the future. For some, the risk of accepting any position in the interim may in itself be long term career-limiting, as licences lapse and recencies are lost. There simply are no benefits in this situation.
a lot of the more senior crew members exiting the flight deck will not be coming back Experience. Have we seen this before? Never on this scale, and that’s why it seems so overwhelmingly daunting. Decide. I will be training ab initio students for the foreseeable future and doing some commercial licence testing and the occasional Airbus simulator session for those willing to use their resources to keep that ATP valid. It is not as straightforward for many. Execute. The roles are allocated, the game plan in action. Check. Monitor those reserves, refine the plan, check for changes around the globe and repeat the TFOReDEC frequently. There will eventually be a suitable airport, with good weather and a choice of approaches. All we need is Time.
16
FlightCom Magazine
TFOReDEC CONSIDERATIONS TIME- HOW MUCH TIME DO WE HAVE? Consider Land ASAP amber or red, is the fuel contained and balanced and agree on how much time is remaining. Consider starting a stopwatch. Ask how much time is available before the aircraft needs to land, are there any technical malfunctions that could change how much time is available? Consider time as either critical, available or required (i.e. buy time by holding or slowing down) FACTS- WHAT ARE THE FACTS? Identify and confirm the problem, gather all relevant facts. Ask what is going on and what are the implications? Are there limitations we need to think about? Can the problem be fixed (reset)? Seek information, look for a convergence of facts to point towards or confirm a problem is what you think it is. Ask why something is the way that it is to probe understanding. OPTIONS- WHAT ARE OUR OPTIONS? Consider continuing, holding, diverting, or turning back to where you came from. Ask what options are available, what choices we have? The use of open questions can assist “What do you think…” Consider the opposite too “What are some reasons that my initial judgement might be wrong?” RISKS AND BENEFITS- WHAT ARE THE (DIS)ADVANTAGES? Weigh up the risks and benefits or advantages and disadvantages of each option. Keep in mind that Risk = Severity x Probability. Consider any latent or overt threats, what can be said for and against the different options. Consider other aspects like if it is safe, legal and possible, does it take into account crew, passenger or company requirements too? experience - HAVE WE SEEN THIS BEFORE? When a solution is obvious to an expert this stage is meant to bring that aspect into the process. Exchange and share your experiences and solution approaches gained in the past concerning the situation. EXECUTE - WHO DOES WHAT? Who shall do what, when and how? This step is part of assigning tasks and communicating, it is also part of an essential aspects of leadership: workload management. Consider providing a NITS briefing x 4 (within the flight deck, to ATC, to the Cabin Crew and to the Airline). Use all available resources. CHECK - HAVE WE MISSED ANYTHING? Review and modify plans, follow-up to check that people are seeing and doing what is expected, if what is expected is not happening, change the plan. Ask if everything is still alright, this step should be repeated whenever workload permits. Encourage the team to state when the situation has changed.
JET & TURBINE SALES EXPERT Led by Maartin Steenkamp and his experienced team, the company has over 60 years of experience in providing the best advice and solutions to companies and individuals looking to operate corporate jets. From single engine turboprops to long range corporate jets and airliners, Ascend Aviation is able to provide the right solution for every need.
Contact Maartin Steenkamp: C +27 (0)82 807 6701 Pierre Kieser C +27 (0)82 577 7815 T +27 (0)11 064 5624 F +27 (0)86 673 9129 E sales@ascendaviation.co.za
FlightCom Magazine
SA Flyer 2019|03
For our list of available aircraft head over to our website www.ascendaviation.co.za.
17
Defence D arren O livier
Canada's Icarus Tactical Aerial Vehicle (TAV) is a direct competitor to the AHRLAC.
THE POSSIBILITIES OF A ‘DIGITAL CENTURY’ STYLE APPROACH It’s becoming ever more difficult, and expensive, to maintain an air force. We are stuck in a vicious loop where higher aircraft acquisition and lifecycle costs result in fewer aircraft being acquired, meaning each aircraft has to do more and last longer, in turn driving up complexity plus acquisition and lifecycle costs.
18
FlightCom Magazine
N
Augustine included a wry reference to this in Law Number XVI from his eponymous laws published in 1984: In the year 2054, the entire defence budget will purchase just one aircraft. This aircraft will have to be shared by the Air Force and Navy 3-1/2 days each per week except for a leap year, when it will be made available to the Marines for the extra day. While written with the US in ORMAN
mind, the principles are universal and affect all. More importantly, this trend has the potential to be devastating for African air forces that are already resourceconstrained and risk being priced out of the market for new and even second-hand aircraft. While some have managed to stave off the problem for a few years by acquiring Russian and Chinese aircraft which remain significantly cheaper than their Western counterparts, that’s only a short-term solution as the same
cost and complexity increases are happening there too. Clearly, a new approach is needed. Fortunately, there are already a few intriguing new ideas and concepts being developed that hope to solve this problem, or at least reduce the rate of cost and complexity increases. Some are all new, possible now only because of advances in computeraided engineering (CAE), others are clever remixes of old methods. Combined, they might just break
The modular approach adopted by AERALIS.
FlightCom Magazine
19
us out of the cost/complexity loop and allow African air forces to remain capable on limited budgets. So let’s look at some of the technological changes that have allowed for a new approach. Fair warning: This section will inevitably contain a number of hyped-up industry buzzwords, though I will attempt to cut through the hype to explain the actual value of each part. First: end-to-end digital product lifecycle management (PLM), using the concept of digital twinning, has proven that if correctly applied, PLM can bring down design, development, engineering and service life operating costs by a substantial amount. It does this by reducing the number of
digital twinning is considered part of ‘Industry 4.0’ prototypes needed, the amount of rework, and both acquisition and lifecycle costs through being able to accurately model and therefore simulate every aspect of a manufactured item, from inception through to disposal. While its constituent components, such as computer-aided design (CAD), computeraided engineering (CAE) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) have been around in various forms for decades, it’s only in more recent years that it has become feasible to go a step further and not 20
FlightCom Magazine
only model every system and sub-component, but to feed back into those models in real-time from builtin sensors incorporated into production systems. To illustrate this let’s look at a typical air force tactical transport aircraft. Before the 1990s, even if the aircraft and many of its components were designed and built using CAD, CAE and CAM, usually only the prototypes were fully instrumented to test the validity of the models against the final system because the sensors were so expensive, bulky and heavy. Production aircraft typically only had relatively basic usage monitoring, such as engine hour meters, along with whatever information was written down by maintenance personnel working on
the aircraft. From the 1990s onwards, this was improved by the adoption of health and usage monitoring systems (HUMS) which collected more data and stored it digitally for alerting and later monitoring. Even these, though, were limited in what data they could collect by the size and cost of sensors. In the past few years though, the size and cost of sensors has fallen so much that it has become possible to incorporate them into production components from the very beginning, so that nearly every component on an aircraft, and every aspect of its behaviour, can be instrumented. What’s more, with data processing getting cheaper and easier each year, those sensors can output data at a much higher resolution than a traditional HUMS and it can even all be collected and analysed in real-time during flight. That analysis, in turn, can run the data against near realtime simulations that incorporate the digital model of the aircraft in order to test how the stresses, the aircraft and its components experience will impact lifespan, maintenance costs and performance. That data in turn is fed back into the model itself in order to continuously improve the basic component and system designs and reduce production and maintenance costs for the next set to come off the
production line. In brief, this is what’s referred to as expense of manufacturing, to how much maintenance digital twinning, and considered part of ‘Industry 4.0’ a design might require, and how even small changes or the fourth main wave of industrial manufacturing. to individual components affect all those over the Modern airline engine manufacturers like Rolls- life of an aircraft. Royce, for instance, now offer maintenance services As a result we’re seeing a raft of new designs where they collect huge amounts of data in real-time for modular aircraft emerging, which are able to from the in-service engines of their client airlines fulfil a wide variety of roles through the swapping and run simulations to predict breakdowns or other of components and sub-assemblies, including entire issues, immediately recommending preventative wing sections, engine pods, payload bays, and so on, maintenance actions that are much, much cheaper around a common base core. This is a unique new than only acting once the part has failed. This is approach. Until now with multi-role aircraft, the another beneficial self-reinforcing cycle, as the goal has been to avoid too much variation in a design data collected further improves the accuracy of so as to avoid skyrocketing production and testing the simulations and costs, so aircraft their predictions manufacturers have over time. to over-engineer An intriguing each design for all side benefit of all the roles it might this is the way need to perform. it can interact If it’s now with additive possible to both manufacturing accurately simulate (aka 3D printing) thousands of design by using the datavariations which are enriched models also cheap and easy An example of a 3D printed part designed using generative in generative to manufacture, test design. The part on the right has the same mounting points design algorithms and strength as the traditionally-designed part on the left, and fly them, it opens but is both much lighter and cheaper to manufacture. to create unique up a world where a part geometries that common basic design minimise material, cost and weight without harming can lead to multiple specialised variants that each strength and longevity. The parts in aircraft are contain only the design elements needed to fulfil going to look increasingly organic, sometimes even their roles. alien, as a result of this process. What’s more, they can be switched between roles Second, this level of product lifecycle management and functions by merely swapping out entire subdigitisation has made it feasible to take riskier bets assemblies, meaning that the aircraft does not fly on highly modular designs that nonetheless have with any systems or components not needed for its enough commonality to keep costs and complexity particular function, saving on wear from usage. down. There’s enough data for simulations to have There are, of course, downsides. Modular designs much greater fidelity and accuracy when modelling are seldom as high performing as a specialised everything from performance, to the ease and design optimised for a small set of roles, and unless
FlightCom Magazine
21
there’s enough discipline about maintaining commonality and standardisation, they can end up being more expensive than purpose-designed options. The goal is also often not to get a 100% solution that can do all things, but to achieve 80-90% of that solution at a lower cost. Nonetheless, they offer new options. Amongst the contenders in this space are the UK’s AERALIS, which is proposing a modular jet training aircraft that can be switched between an advanced trainer with a swept wing (AERALIS A), a basic trainer with a straight wing and single engine (AERALIS B) and a bespoke or aerobatics aircraft (AERALIS X) while preserving 85% commonality in parts. Another is South Africa’s own AHRLAC, now back in production after a business rescue process. The AHRLAC is built around a huge modular payload bay and open architecture software system, with the idea that the most complex and expensive electronics, sensors and components needed for each mission type are contained within standardised payload pods that can be swapped in and out as needed. Similar to AHRLAC is a new contender in the same space from Canada called Icarus Aerospace, which is offering the Tactical Air Vehicle (TAV) in both a 22
FlightCom Magazine
weaponised and high altitude variant, using modular parts. Third, while software remains a huge problem for all aircraft projects as a result of its neverslowing cost and complexity, the same modular approaches are starting to have an effect via open architectures that separate out flight-critical software from mission-specific software so as to allow for them to be developed at different paces without compromising each other. Traditionally, everything that ran on an aircraft’s computers required pretty much the same level of testing and certification, driving up costs. Now, as seen on Saab’s Gripen E, an open architecture concept in the onboard systems provides for mission-specific ‘apps’ to be developed, installed and removed, all without affecting the core software systems. Bringing all this together, the US Air Force’s head of acquisition Will Roper has proposed a fascinating new approach to specifying, designing, buying and operating aircraft that he’s calling the Digital Century Series, an attempt to bring back some element of the USAF’s approach in the 1950s and 1960s when dozens of manufacturers produced the “Century Series” fighters with short development timelines and low costs. This approach draws on all
the developments mentioned above and recommends moving to a system where modularity and shared components are embraced to allow for a wide variety of aircraft designs from the same core parts that can be created, tested, deployed and retired in a fraction of the time and cost it takes to just develop current multi-role, multi-mission aircraft designed to operate for 30+ years. The hope is also to move away from relying on an everdwindling number of aircraft
manufacturers, with the idea that one manufacturer may be contracted to produce a core fuselage, as with the AERALIS concept, while others produce and test modular add-ons and other variations. Iteration of designs, and continuous improvement, would be prioritised over trying to create designs that last for decades. If this Digital Century Series concept, and the enabling modular and technological approaches, succeed, it’ll represent a revolutionary change in military aircraft design and acquisition that may finally break the cost cycle and disprove Augustine’s law. It may also reverse the worrying trend where African air forces are becoming priced out of the market entirely. For that reason alone, it’s worth keeping a close eye on Will Roper’s new Digital Century Series approach.
WORDS: GUY LEITCH
Industry Update:
BOEING 787
TROUBLES CONTINUE Boeing's production quality problems just get worse. The latest development may affect as many as 680 Boeing 787 Dreamliners.
Boeing's 787-10 final assembly is still struggling with flawed barrel joints.
O
5 September Boeing disclosed a new manufacturing quality issue with the 787, this time with assembly of the airliner’s horizontal tail in Salt Lake City. During fabrication in Salt Lake of the 787’s horizontal tail, engineers discovered earlier this year that “certain components were clamped together during the build process with greater force than specified,” potentially leaving the structure with gaps between components wider than the five-thousandths of N
an inch that’s allowable in the specification, Boeing said. Boeing spokesperson Jessica Kowal pointed out that the gap tolerance required is only slightly more than the thickness of a sheet of paper, which is about fourthousandths of an inch. Such gaps are typically filled with small pieces of material called shims. This flaw, which Boeing said was identified during an internal audit conducted in February, “may lead to premature aging” of the horizontal tail structure. Kowal said none of the affected 787s currently in service with airlines around the world
“are within a window when they would experience this aging,” and so “this is not an immediate safety of flight issue. We are correcting the issue on airplanes that have not been delivered,” Kowal said. “The rework generally involves removing fasteners at the affected locations, applying a calibrated clamping force, measuring for any gaps and shimming if required.” Then, on 11 September Boeing confirmed that it was dealing with the FAA about substandard joints between fuselage barrels. It was revealed that the vertical fin is affected by the potential flaws, which were actually discovered almost a year ago but the company said in a statement its engineers decided “it did not immediately affect the safety of flight and no immediate action is required.” The statement also said it expects the issue to be resolved by “a onetime inspection during regularly scheduled maintenance.” Boeing also released data showing the order backlog for the 737 MAX has been reduced this year by almost 1,000 jets.
FlightCom Magazine
23
News G uy L eitch
MAF
FOUNDER
STUART KING DIES
M
Aviation Fellowship (MAF) has been a powerfully effective force for good in enabling access to remote areas. MAF’s founder Stuart King has now passed on to a higher reward at the age of 98. Guy Leitch’s column attitude for altitude in September 2019 reviewed King’s remarkable life and the column is reproduced on the following pages as a tribute to King. Stuart King founded MAF with Jack Hemmings using a war surplus De Havilland Rapide, supported by much prayer more than 70 years ago. The exRAF engineer was convinced that aircraft could be a vital link to remote areas of Africa and he and Hemmings flew a Miles Gemini through Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Kenya and the Congo on a six-month tour to test that hypothesis. MAF now serves 1,400 remote locations in 26 countries in support of more than 2,000 humanitarian and missionary organisations. It’s also a highly developed aviation organisation with high standards for aircraft maintenance and pilot training and fiscal management. Recognising his contribution, King received an award from the Honourable Company of Air Pilots in 2019 to add to the long list of humanitarian tributes paid to him.
24
ISSION
FlightCom Magazine
MAF founder Stuart King in front of their pioneering De Havilland Rapide.
GUY LEITCH'S COLUMN REPRINT:
FLYING MISSIONARIES IN AFRICA Love them or hate them – missionaries have done a huge amount to open up the ‘dark continent’. And general aviation has been an essential tool to get missionaries into and out of dark places.
H
Morton Stanley’s epic travels to find the missionary David Livingstone, and Joseph Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness’ brought the travails of travel into central Africa to the attention of the world. You had to be nuts – or called by God – to want to travel far into Africa. It was the call of God which was the strongest, as undaunted, the missionaries kept coming. They lived, procreated and died in the most inaccessible places. Some fervent evangelists won souls, others learned the native lingo, opened schools and translated the Bible, and others – well they achieved nothing ENRY
The crashed Gemini on a Burundi hillside in 1948.
much more than train thousands of women to crochet the large tablecloths which you can still find in the rural markets. The life of many of these missionaries was often unimaginably tough. They would travel by boat, train, mule and on foot into the most inaccessible
places – the more inaccessible the better – and start a new mission station far from the comforts of home or civilisation. Particularly difficult was what to do in case of sickness. And many got sick with malaria, blackwater fever, dysentery, sleeping sickness and the myriad other tropical diseases
FlightCom Magazine
25
they had never been exposed to in Europe. And then the World Wars happened. The legacy these wars left for remote missionaries was a sudden huge increase in air transport capability and the availability of experienced pilots. The aeroplane had come of age and could be reasonably relied on to get to the most remote missionaries, if their local population could be persuaded to hack an airstrip out of the jungle or mountainside using spades and pangas. The most significant of the air transport support services to missionaries is Mission Aviation Fellowship – MAF. In the 75 years since its founding, MAF has grown to provide aviation support for missionaries around the world. MAF was founded by aero engineer Stuart King and a handful of other pilots who had been demobbed after World War 2. As fervent Christians they responded to the call of God to use their aviation skills to improve access to the most remote mission fields. For the seventieth anniversary of MAF, Stuart
Dave Forney
Modern C208 operations.
26
FlightCom Magazine
King, then aged 94, was interviewed. He recounts; “Although we were professionals in aviation, we were all amateurs in mission! We just felt the call to go. We didn’t think ahead to what it might become, we didn’t analyse it; we just went.” They pooled their funds, bought an underpowered Miles Gemini very light twin and flew it out to Africa. It became a nine-month survey flight across Africa, “armed with a calling from God and only £250 in our back pockets! The sight of Africa was moving and impressive: desert and swamp, later jungle and mountains. That first pioneering survey was exciting, tough and dangerous.” A big reality check hit them when they were flying over the mountains of Burundi and were caught in a lee downdraft. They could not outclimb the mountain and crashed. Luckily without serious injury and they were able to get back to Nairobi by road without too much trouble. The little four-seater Gemini had served them well as they had by then surveyed much of Sudan,
Uganda, Burundi, Rwanda and the Congo. It was evident that the need for fast and efficient air transport was essential if the backwaters of Africa were to be opened up. And it also became clear that this service was not just needed by missionaries, but by the governments and colonial authorities. That first crash was a huge setback and they briefly questioned whether they really had heard God’s call. They convinced themselves that they had, and carried on, but reduced to surveying potential air strip sites by mule and on foot. King says, “I remember once trekking for two days looking for airstrips and reaching missionaries who hadn’t seen white people for six months. That was the isolation they faced. The change the plane made was startling. We served, prayed and cried with these brave people. It was such a joy.” Back in England they managed to put the insurance pay out on the Gemini towards an already vintage 1930s De Havilland Dragon Rapide Mk 2. They needed the two engines to satisfy the government, and the performance was adequate for the flat Sudan. But their Rapide Mk 2 had fixed pitch props and thus had no single engine performance to speak of. It was one of those twins where an engine failure meant that the other engine would have just taken them to the scene of the accident. They had taken a huge leap of faith in trying to start an air service in remote parts of Africa, and it was soon evident that there was a desperate need. In his book ‘Hope has Wings’ Stuart King describes the plight of a sick missionary at Yabus in Southern Sudan; Betty Guth had been desperately ill for two
weeks. They suspected sleeping sickness and knew she would die without help, so they dispatched a runner to the government post at Kurmuk, 110 km away, with a telegraph message. The nearest hospital was 800 km away in Khartoum, and it was the rainy season. Betty and her husband Chuck had been able to drive to Yabus (with their three-month old baby and a year’s supplies) before the rains set in. But they could not drive out in the rainy season as the trails were swamped and the sticky cotton spoil was treacherous. It was a fearsome 250 km journey west
It soon became evident that general aviation could provide essential and safe air transport to remote regions. to the Nile which would take two weeks and they would have to traverse the Dinka swamps, where two other missionary children had already died. They made a rough stretcher for Betty and the baby and covered it with a mosquito net. The first hard day’s slog took them 50 km to the nearest mission station at Doro. This was in the territory of the Mabaan tribe, so the Yabus stretcher bearers refused to go any further. The mission at Doro hired new stretcher bearers and some donkeys from the Sudanese police post. They slogged on, sometimes chest deep in the swamps. They rode the animals until they could no longer carry them and then walked until they could walk no further. They slept in the Mabaan villages and boiled water from mud puddles for the baby on a Primus stove. And the next day they did it again. And again.
FlightCom Magazine
27
The Dragon Rapide in Sudan.
As they moved on into the Dinka marshlands it became harder and harder to find carriers. They had hoped to catch the paddlewheel steamer on the Nile, but after six days they were still a day short of the river and the stretcher bearers refused to continue. The missionaries prayed and were answered when the four strongest Dinkas agreed to go on. The next day they
heard a truck pushing through the long grass. It had received the runner’s telegram and come looking for them. But they still had a frantic 40 km dash on the truck, bouncing through potholes in trackless bush, to get to Melut to catch the post boat. Their prayers were again answered as they made the boat in time. They then had two days on the boat to get to the 28
FlightCom Magazine
railhead at Kosti, 180 km south of Khartoum. A further day on the train got them to hospital in Khartoum. The journey had taken 10 impossibly gruelling days. King writes that such stories were only too common, some of them ending in tragedy. They made missions, as well as the Sudan government, reluctant to allow people to work in such remote situations. A better means in and out was essential. When MAF arrived with the Rapide they based it in Malakal in Sudan, where it lasted just three years before the harsh conditions deteriorated the wood and canvas aeroplane to an unflyable condition. A year later Betty Guth had to be evacuated from Yabus once again to have her second baby. But by now they had made an
airstrip at Yabus and the Rapide made the journey to Khartoum in four hours, instead of ten tortured days. It soon became evident to the Sudanese authorities, and indeed governments across Africa, that general aviation could provide essential and safe air transport to their remote regions. The Sudanese government increasingly called on MAF to
transport officials quickly and safely. And then, in 1956, Sudan got its independence from Britain. As in much of post-colonial Africa, the missionaries were driven out and, as Nigerian Chinua Achebe famously quoted, ‘Things Fall Apart’. The aftermath can be read in Hugh Pryor’s wonderful stories of flying for the Red Cross in Southern Sudan.
WORDS: GUY LEITCH
Industry Update:
IATA - QUARANTINES WILL KILL AFRICAN AIRLINE REBOUND The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has called on governments in Africa and the Middle East (AME) to implement testing as an alternative to quarantine measures when re-opening their economies to international air travel.
T
countries in Africa and the Middle East have quarantine measures in place. This is an increase of seven countries since August. The impact is that the region effectively remains in lockdown despite borders being open. Recent public opinion research by IATA showed that 88% of travellers would not even consider travelling if quarantine measures were imposed on them at their destination. “Mandatory quarantine measures stop people from traveling. We understand that governments’ priority is on protecting the well–being of their citizens. Quarantine destroys livelihoods. Testing is an alternative method that will also save travel and tourism jobs,” said Muhammad Albakri, HIRTY-FIVE
IATA’s Regional Vice President for Africa and the Middle East. “Testing provides a safe alternative to quarantine and a solution to stop the economic and social devastation being caused by COVID-19,” said IATA’s Albakri. Travellers support testing instead of quarantine restrictions. The latest IATA survey of passenger attitudes in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) shows that 72% of people surveyed agreed that those who test negative for Covid should not have to quarantine, and that 80% of people feel that Covid-19 is sufficiently under control in the country to open borders. IATA reports that quarantines, closed borders and travel restrictions continue to decimate travel demand in Africa and the Middle East. Traffic levels in
Africa and the Middle East saw the largest drop of all regions in July compared to 2019 levels. Total passenger traffic in Africa in July 2020 was 93.7% below 2019 levels and in the Middle East 95.5% below 2019 levels.
Aviation supported more than 6.2 million jobs and $56 billion in GDP in Africa and 2.4 million jobs and $130 billion in GDP in the Middle East pre-COVID-19. The economic impact of the collapse in air traffic in 2020 due to COVID-19 could be 3.5 million lost jobs and $35 billion in GDP in Africa and 1.5 million lost jobs and $85 billion in GDP Middle East.
RIGHT: IATA's Muhammad Albakri - opposing quarantines.
FlightCom Magazine
29
Search & Rescue S tory & I mages : G rant D uncan S mith
WILDERNESS SEARCH & RESCUE One of the two dedicated AMS helicopters.
If you crash in a remote part of South Africa it’s really good to know that there is a vast multidisciplinary network of resources that can quickly be mobilised to come to your rescue. 30
FlightCom Magazine
I
the Western Cape, the Wilderness Search & Rescue (WSAR) is the umbrella body which coordinates the activities of a diverse coalition of government and volunteer organisations. WSAR is a wonderful example of cooperation between government and non-governmental resources. WSAR was formed under the auspices of the Western Cape’s Metro Emergency Medical Services, and functions under the authority of Metro EMS – the provincial ambulance and rescue service. N
Remote Search & Rescue (S&R) is a complex business, so Metro EMS provides logistical and air support, control room functions, vehicles, as well as limited financial and equipment support. In all other respects, WSAR maintains its own identity and autonomy and provides rescue services to the communities of the Western Cape and beyond, through a Memorandum of Understanding with the Western Cape Government. It is of great comfort to know that a multitude of specialist rescue skills are available when the need arises. The many S&R organisations that fall under the Metro EMS include the Red Cross Air Mercy Service, the Mountain Club of South Africa,
the Off Road Rescue Unit of the Four Wheel Drive Club of South Africa, Table Mountain Rescue, High Angle Rescue, Hiker’s Network, Delta Search and Rescue, the NSRI, Hamnet (Ham radio), South African National Parks, CapeNature (Conservation), the South African Air Force and the South African Police Service. The Air Medical Service (AMS) contract is for two helicopters for the whole of the Western Cape. While there are a number of helicopters available at any given time on a rotational basis, there will always be two “response machines” on duty for WSAR, namely Skymed 1 which serves the Cape metropole and to the north, and Skymed 2 for the Southern Cape, Garden Route, Little and Great Karroo. Both of these have ASR and MSR (ambulance) capabilities. At times, these can respond to lend a hand in the neighbouring provinces, in particular, to the Eastern Cape where many rescues are performed on the Otter Trail. The Western Cape Department of Health Emergency Medical Service plans training sessions throughout the year for both wilderness and surf rescue. The teams, consisting of all member organisations train as they would operate, because they operate as they have trained.
Detailed safe operating procedures remain a work in progress, and these live procedures are reviewed regularly by peer review. The training and operating processes are looked after by a special technical group which is made up of rescue technicians and hi-angle technicians and AMS. There is a mountain rescue technical group (HTG) and a surf rescue technical group (ASRTG) Teamwork is key to successful deployments. At any given training there is a clear purpose planned and Rigorous training in various scenarios helps keep a high level of proficiency.
a safety officer and ground control officer allocated. Training is not done simply for mandatory currency retention, but to ensure the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) get drilled again and again and serve as an opportunity for all to bond, build trust, and develop the muscle memory required to make actions instinctive. Various sites are selected around the peninsula for their distance from the general public, general aviation and safety while being as close to an operational environment as possible. Scenario based training ensures the SOPs trained on are the same processes for an operation. Each exercise is preceded by briefings on ground safety on the Landing Zone, exercise safety and deployments and on equipment rigging. All exercises, like all operations, end with a full debrief immediately after the event on the Landing Zone. No single training exercise is the same as the last,
FlightCom Magazine
31
The AMS helicopter in action.
as the environment is dynamic and there are always
variables in terrain conditions and weather, such as temperature and winds. At the training exercises volunteers and professionals from all 17 member organisations get to meet and greet, learn to work together as one team and use their individual group skills to contribute to a safe, competent and effective wilderness search and
VOLUNTEERS GIVE FREELY OF THEIR TIME AND TALENTS TO WORK IN TRAINING AND REAL-LIFE RESCUES rescue program. Almost all the rescuers in WSAR come from volunteer organisations whose members give freely of their time and talents to work in training and real-life rescues. As the umbrella body
32
FlightCom Magazine
WSAR maintains high safety standards and upholds a strict policy of rescuer currency, demanding much time and effort on the part of rescuers to meet these standards. In addition, the senior WSAR leadership give freely of their time to attend administrative, planning and training meetings, in furtherance of a culture of safety, self-critical introspection and constant improvement. Numerous specialist Working Groups have been formed to guide the creation and maintenance of the performance criteria, standard operating procedures and best practice guidelines offered by WSAR. The individual team members are required to self-fund fuel costs, cell phone expenses, and the costs of personal rescue and other gear, for rescues, exercises and other administrative functions. These personal costs can be considerable in the busy months of the Cape summer. Funds generated from donations are not channelled back to rescuers for reimbursement of personal costs, but are allocated to a dedicated equipment fund and used exclusively for the purchase of much-needed technical rescue and dedicated medical equipment. If you would like to support WSAR, please visit: https://wsar.org.za/ support-us/ ďƒź
Thorough briefings are vital for the safety and success of the operation.
Hangarage
Export Docs & Clearing
Lodge Transfers
(armed)
Line Inspections
Security Based
Aircraft Leasing
Aerial Photography
Maintenance
Surveys
Aircraft Sales
Contracts
Safari Charters
Special Events
Helicopter
Freight
FAX NO
V.I.P
TEL NO
Biz-Jets
CODE
> 20 pax
NAME OF CHARTER
< 20 pax
CHARTER DIRECTORY
Long-Range
+27 (0) 11 917 4220 www.atlasoil.africa
BRAKPAN FABB Titanium Air
(011)
914 5810
083 292 0978
j
jjj
ExecuJet South Africa
(021)
934 5764
934 2087
jjjjj
jjjj
MS Aviation
(021)
531 3162
531 4209
jjjjjj
jjj
Streamline Air Charter
(011)
395 1195/8
jjjjj
jj
(031)
564 6215
Avcon Jet Africa
(011)
312 5676
Pambele Aviation
(011)
805-0652/82
805-0649
Batair Cargo
(011)
659 2000
701 2253
ExecuJet South Africa
(011)
516 2300
659 2520
Majestic Air Charters
(018)
632 6477
Out of the Blue Air Safaris
(011)
701 2653
j
CAPE TOWN jjj j
j
jjjj jjj j
DURBAN KZN Aviation
564 6222
j
jjjjjj
j
j
jj
GRAND CENTRAL j
jjjj
j
j
jjjj
j
jjj
j
j
LANSERIA AIRPORT j jjjjj j 082 905 5760
j
j jjjjj
jjj
jj
jjj
j
j
jjjj
j
j
jjj
jjj
j
jj
j
j
OR TAMBO INTERNATIONAL Fair Aviation (Pty) Ltd
(011)
395 4552
395 4244
jjjj
Federal Airlines
(011)
395 9000
086 667 1789
jjjjjjjjjj
jjj
Streamline Air Charter
(011)
395 1195/8
jjjjj
j
(012)
566 3019
j
jj
RAND AIRPORT FlyFofa Airways
www.flyfofa.co.za
jj
jj
j
WINDHOEK - SWAKOPMUND Scenic Air (Pty) Ltd
(+264)
6440 3575
info@scenic-air.com.na
j
j
j
WONDERBOOM AIRPORT - PRETORIA Alpha One Aviation
(082)
301 9977
Aviation @ Work
(012)
567 3443
jjjj
jjj
j
Flyjetstream Aviation
(012)
543 0060
(083) 279 7853
jjjjjjjjjjjj
jjj
jjj
Maverick Air Charters
(012)
940 0320
086 648 2690
jjjjjjjjjjj
jj
jjj
Powered Flight Charters
(078)
460 1231
086 666 2077
j
jjjj j
j
j jj
j
jjjjjj
j
j
jj
j
jj
FlightCom Magazine
j
j
33
FLIGHT SCHOOL LISTING
Club Facilities
Aircraft/Heli Sales
Accommodadtion
Microlights & Ferry Flights
Gyro-Copter Training
Beginners/Advanced
Aerobatic Training
Charters
Hire and Fly
Conferences
Pilot Shop
Tail Draggers
Helicopter Training
CPL Practical
CPL Theory
Conversions
Simulator Training
Instructors Rating
IF Rating
FAX NO
Night Rating
TEL NO
Multi Engine
CODE
Single Engined
NAME OF School
Ab-Initio Training
LEARN TO FLY WITH US
Turbine - GS Training
Cell: 082 556 3592 Email: dale@alpiaviation.co.za
BETHLEHEM Paramount Aviation
(058)
050 0493
info@flyparamount.co.za
(011)
914-5810
083-292-0978
j
jjjjjjj j j
jj j
j
j
BRAKPAN BENONI FABB Titanium Air
j
j
j
j
jj
j
CAPE TOWN Aviation Pilot Training
(021)
935 0719
Cape Town Flight Training Centre (021)
976 7053
admin@cape-town-flying.co.za j j j j j j j j j j j
jj j
j
Era Flug
(021)
934-7431
934-7435
jj j j
j
Durban Aviation Centre
(031)
573-2995
Starlite Aviation Training Academy
(031)
571-6600
www.starliteaviation.com
(043)
736-6181
086-516-8475
(044)
876-0096
Avcon Jet Africa
(011)
312-5676
www.avconjet.training
Flight Training Services
(011)
805-9015/6
805-9018
j jjjjjjj j j
Lanseria Flight Centre
(011)
312-5166
312-5159
j j jjjjjjj j j
Superior Pilot Services
(011)
805-0605
805-0604
j j jjjjjjj j jj
Alpi Flight Academy
(082)
556-3592
086-605-8948
Aviatech Flight Academy
(082)
303 1124
www.aviatech.co.za/
j j jjjjj
j
jj
j jjjjjjj j j
j j
j
DURBAN j j jjjjjjj j j
j
j
j
j j jjjjjjj j jjjjj j jjj
jjj
EAST LONDON Border Aviation Club
j jjjjjjj j jj
j
j
j
j
GEORGE AIRPORT Savannah Helicopter Training
jjj
j
j
j
jj
jj
j
GRAND CENTRAL j j jjjjjjj j j
jj j
j
jj
jj
j
jjj
jj
j jj
jj
j
j
j
KRUGERSDORP j jjjjj j
jjj
jj
j
jj
jjjjj j j
jj
j
j
j
jj j
LANSERIA AIRPORT / RANDBURG Aeronav Academy Gryphon Flight Academy Skyhawk Aviation
(011) (082) (011)
701-3862 562-5060 701-2622
701-3873 701-2623
j j jjjjjjj j j j jj j j jjjjjjj j j
(044)
692-0006
www.starliteaviation.com
j j jjjjjjj j jjjjj j jjj
(064)
756 6356
(041)
581-3274
086-461-7067
j jjjjjjj j j
j jjjjjjj j j j j jjjjjjj j j
j j
j j jj
j
j
j
MOSSEL BAY Starlite Aviation Training Academy
jjj
PANORAMA Johannesburg Flying Academy
jj
jjj
jjj
j
j
j
jj j
j
jj j j jj
j j
jj
j
j
j
PORT ELIZABETH Algoa Flying Club
j
RAND AIRPORT Johannesburg School of Flying
(011)
827 9827
info@jsf.co.za
U Fly Training Academy
(011)
824-0680
390-1738
Richards Bay Air Carriers
(035)
786-0146/7
786-0145
Rustenburg Flying Club
(082)
821 1690
082 619 8633
RICHARDS BAY8 RUSTENBURG
j jjjjj jjjj
jjj jj
j
j
jj
VEREENIGING AIRPORT Bird Aviation
(016)
556-1007
info@birdaviation.co.za
Desert Air (PTY) LTD
+264
61 228101
+264 61 254 345
j j jjjj
j
j
Blue Chip Flight School
(012)
543-3050
543-1826
Loutzavia
(012)
567-6775
543-1519
Legend Sky
(083)
860-5225
086-600-7285
Powered Flight Training
(078)
460-1231
086-666-2077
Vortx Aviation Training
(072)
480-0359
086-524-0949
j j jjjjjjj j jj j j j j j jjjjjjj j j jj j j j jjjjjjj jjj j j j j j jjjjj j jj jjj j j j jjj j jj jj
j j j j j
WINDHOEK - EROS AIRPORT
j jjjjjjj j j
jj
j
jj
WONDERBOOM AIRPORT / AEROPARK / RHINO PARK - PRETORIA111
34
FlightCom Magazine
j
jj
jj
jjj jj j jj j j j j
LEARN TO
Dale de Klerk Cell: +27825563592 Fax: 0866058948 Skype: dale_de_klerk Email: dale@alpiaviation.co.za
FLY WITH
FROM NPL
THROUGH
US
TO CPL
SA Flyer 2020|09
WE NOW OFFER TA I L W H E E L TRAINING & A E R O B AT IC TRAINING
✗ ✗ ✗ ✗
Britz
Rudi
Wonderboom Airport
083 422 9882
rudiavmed@gmail.com
Church
Belinda
Valhalla
079 636 9860
churchbs@live.com
Du Plessis
Alexander
Athlone Park
031 904 7460
dex.duplessis@intercare.co.za
Erasmus
Philip
Benoni
011 849 6512
pdceras-ass@mweb.co.za
Govender
Deena
Umhlanga Rocks
031 566 2066/7 deena@drdg.co.za
✗ ✗
Ingham
Kenneth
Midrand
011 315 5817
kaingham@hotmail.com
✗ ✗
Marais
Eugene
Mossel Bay
044 693 1470
eugene.marais@medicross.co.za
✗ ✗
Opperman
Chris
Pretoria Lynnwood
012 368 8800
chris.opperman@intercare.co.za
Schutz
Ernest
Germiston
011 825 5300
schutzfm@iafrica.com
Tenzer
Stan
Rand Airport & JHB CBD
083 679 0777
stant@global.co.za
✗ ✗ ✗
Toerien
Hendrik
White River, Nelspruit
013 751 3848
hctoerien@viamediswitch.co.za
✗ ✗ ✗
Van Der Merwe
Johann
Stellenbosch
021 887 0305
johann.vdmerwe@medicross.co.za
Van Niekerk
Willem
Benoni
011 421 9771
http://willemvanniekerk.co.za
Other countries
EASA registered
TEL NO
FAA registered
LOCATION
Off-site Specialist tests
FIRST NAME
On site Specialist tests
SURNAME
Senior Class 1, 2, 3, 4
AME Doctors Listing
Regular Class 2, 3, 4
w w w. a l p i a v i a t i o n . c o . z a
✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗
✗ ✗
✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗
✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗ ✗
FlightCom Magazine
35
AMO LISTING
CAPE TOWN
FAX NO
Sheet Metal Rebuilds Overhauls Electrics NDT Testing Refurbishments Structural Repairs Inspections NTCA Aircraft Seat Belts Instruments
CODE TEL NO
Interior
NAME OF AMO
Fixed Wing Helicopter Avionics Piston Engines Turbine Engines Propellers Weight / Balance Paint
AERO ENGINEERING & POWERPLANT
AES
(082)
494 3722
Cape Aircraft Interiors
(021)
934 9499
934 2022
ExecuJet South Africa
(021)
934 5764
934 2087
j
Placo
(079)
674 8351
076 901 6780
j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j jj
BAC Aviation Greystones Aviation Components
(035) (031)
797 3610 569 2614
797 5341 569 2630
Astwood Aircraft Electrical
(011)
315 9605
315 0094
Superior Rotorworx
(076)
595 2120
(082)
346 0150
086 697 9096
AES
(011)
701 3200
701 3232
Aircraft Assessing Company (Pty) Ltd
(083)
310 8588
Paull@aacglobal.co.za
jj
ExecuJet South Africa
(011)
516 2300
011 659 1071
j
Gem Air
(082)
905 5760
011 701 2653
j
Integrated Avionic Solutions
(082)
831 5032
012 567 7320
Lanseria Aircraft Interiors
(011)
659 1962
Plane Maintenance Facility
(011)
659 2204
SkySource International SA
(011)
900 4300
The Propeller Shop
(011)
701 3114
086 543 7988
Tynay Aviation
(082)
088 6663
011 659 1157/8 j
Diepkloof Aircraft Maintenance
(083)
454 6366
Aircraft Maintenance International Leading Edge Helicopters cc
(013) (013)
741 8221 741 5582
Ferreira Aviation Flightdeck Instrument Systems Westline Aircraft Maintenance
(051) (073) (051)
451 1682 513 3205 451 1717
Nevergreen Aircraft Industries Star Air Maintenance
(010) (011)
003 3747 395 2201
43 Air School
(046)
604 3686
(084) (011) (011) (011) (082)
710 0864 827 7535 827 2491 383 2024 445 4496
DURBAN
j
j
j
j j jj j
j jj
jjj j j j
j
jjjjjj
j
jj
j j
jj
jj
j
j
jj
jj j
jj
j
j
j
GRAND CENTRAL AIRPORT j jjjj
j j j jjjjjjjj
jj
KRUGERSDORP Skyworx Aviation
j
j
j j j jj
jjjj
LANSERIAâ&#x20AC;&#x2C6;AIRPORT
MALMESBURY NELSPRUIT
NEW TEMPE BLOEMFONTEIN
OR TAMBO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PORT ALFRED
RAND AIRPORT
36
j
j j
j
jjj j j j jj
j
jjjj
j
j
j
j
j j
j
j
jj
jj pmf@myconnection.co.za
jjjjjj
j
j
j
j
jjj
j
jjjj
j j j jj
j
jjj
j
j
j
jj
j j
j
j
jj
jj
j j
jj
jjjj
082 787 0415 741 8188
jj
jj
j j
jjj
jjjj
451 1683
j
j
j
jj
jj
j j
j
jj
j
j
jj
jj
j
j
451 1641
jjjj
manager@nevergreen.co.za
j
973 4761
j
jj j j
jj j
j
jj
jjjjj
j
jj
j j j jjjj
j
j j j j jj
1
AMKA Aviation Pty (Ltd) Aerospace Electroplating Aviation Rebuilders CC Clifton Electronics Dynamic Propellers
FlightCom Magazine
j
827 9896
jj
lyn@aviationrebuilders.com
j
086 689 5645 086 548 2651
j jjj
j
jj
jj j
jj j
j
j j
Composite Manufacturing
Structural Repairs Inspections NTCA Aircraft Seat Belts Instruments
Sheet Metal Rebuilds Overhauls Electrics NDT Testing Refurbishments
FAX NO
Interior
CODE TEL NO
Fixed Wing Helicopter Avionics Piston Engines Turbine Engines Propellers Weight / Balance Paint
NAME OF AMO
RAND AIRPORT CONTINUED Emperor Aviation
(082)
497 1701
FLYONICS (Pty) Ltd
(082)
686 2374
michael@flyonics.co.za
Heli-Afrique cc
(011)
827 8632
086 503 1870
Placo (Pty) Ltd
(011) 827 9301
jjjj
j j j jjjj
j j
j jj
j
j jj
jj j
j
jj
j
j
827 3801
j
jjjjj j j jjjjj j jjjjj
(035)
786 0146/7 786 0145
j
jj
jj j j jjj
(083)
736 3969
086 508 6010
j
jj
jj j j
744 3412 110 4033 567 3443 741 8221 543 3196 802 1347 543 0948 301 9977 442 5884 543 0775 464 7130 749 9256
086 613 9922 082 565 2330
j
jj
j
j
j
j
j
jj
j
jj
jj
jj
RICHARDS BAY Alton Aero Engineering
j
SPRINGS AIRFIELD Legair Maintenance
WONDERBOOM AIRPORT - PRETORIA
208 Aviation Aerocore Aircraft Maintenance @ Work Pty Ltd Aircraft Maintenance International Adventure Air Aerotric Aero Engineering & Powerplant
Alpha One Aviation
AviSys Aviation Systems APCO Pty Ltd AVIA Instruments Avtech Aircraft Services Breytech Aviation cc
(083) (012) (012) (013) (012) (087) (012) (082) (083) (012) (082) (082) (012)
567 3500
Sport Plane Builders cc
(083)
361 3181
TAM Interiors
(083)
455 0215
Propeller Centre cc
(012)
567 1689
082 787 0415 543 2323
j jj
j
jjj
j jjj
j jj
aerotric@aol.com
j
543 9447
j
j
jj j
jj
086 618 6996 567 3630 086 602 6171 082 555 2808
jjjj j jjjjj
j
j
j j
j
j
jj
j j
jj
j
jjj
j
j
j
j
jj
086 643 0122
jj
j
jj j
086 514 5066
j
jj
j
jj
j
jjj
j
jjjj
j jjj
jj
j jjj
j
086 638 6821
j
j
j
j
j
NIGERIA - MURTALA MUHAMMED INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ExecuJet Aviation Nigeria Ltd
+2341 295 5110
j
j
j
j
jj
jj j
jj
j
JOHANNESBURG F Gomes Upholsters
(011)
614 2471
614 9806
jj
j
j
Comporob CC
(012)
940 4447
086 502 3689
jj
j
jj
M&N Acoustics Services Pty (Ltd)
(012)
689 2007
086 211 469
jjjjjjj
j
PRETORIA j
j
jj
j
• Overhaul / Shockload / Repair of Continental and Lycoming Aircraft engines; •Overhaul Engine; Components; •Overhaul and supply of Hartzell / McCauley and Fix pitch Propellers Hangar no 4, Wonderboom Airport , Pretoria PO Box 17699, Pretoria North, 0116 • Tel: (012) 543 0948/51 • Fax: (012) 543 9447 • email: aeroeng@iafrica.com AMO No: 227
FLIGHT SAFETY THROUGH MAINTENANCE
FlightCom Magazine
37
Historic S tory : D es B arker
THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN â&#x20AC;&#x201C; AND GERMAN BLUNDERS
38
FlightCom Magazine
The Hurricane was outclassed by the Bf-109 but the Spitfire changed that.
'Never in the field of human
conflict was so much owed by so many to so few'.
(Winston Churchill, 20 August 1940)
FlightCom Magazine
39
This article pays tribute to those that have tasted the fear of mortal combat in fighting for a cause for which they were prepared to pay the ultimate sacrifice; for their country or their comrades in arms. In the immortal words of poet Laurence Binyon (1869-1943): “They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old: Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn. At the going down of the sun and in the morning, we will remember them.”
T
90th anniversary of the Battle of Britain was commemorated on 15 September 2020 by means of commemoration services which provided an opportune time to reminisce on the most classical air battle in history. It can be argued that poor intelligence and abandoning the Principles of War, constituted the major contribution to the Luftwaffe losing the Battle of Britain. The tenets expressed in this article are those of the writer: Maj Gen D.E. Barker (SAAF Ret). HE
Total air superiority, in more modern parlance,
‘air dominance’, was the minimum operational requirement for Operation Sea Lion, the German invasion of Britain, to be attempted. Hitler was winning and Britain was about to be defeated. Theoretically, on paper at least; numerically, there was no way that Britain could survive Hitler’s ill-conceived plans; 600 RAF fighters should have been overwhelmed by the Luftwaffe’s 2800 fighters and bombers when on 15 September 1940 Germany proclaimed ‘Eagle Day’. THE BATTLE
PRELUDE
For one moment, close your eyes and recall the European Spring of 1940. The Nazis had swept through the Low Countries and into France. The British Expeditionary Force had been defeated and had retreated from Dunkirk with a large proportion of Britain’s fighting equipment left on the other side of the channel. The last bastion facing the Nazi onslaught lay across the English Channel; Britain stood totally isolated, but at that stage, without anyone realising it, the outcome of World War II, depended on whether or not the Luftwaffe would succeed in destroying the Royal Air Force’s (RAF) Fighter Command.
40
FlightCom Magazine
This battle has been analysed ‘ad nauseum’ at the strategic and operational level by strategists, students of air power and by air force staff colleges. Most appreciations of the battle essentially focussed on the different capabilities and resources ranged against each other, but very few dug deeper and attempted to get to grips with the personalities involved in the strategic and operational thinking, both in the RAF and Luftwaffe. The crux is that the Great War of 1915 shaped the strategic thinking and tactical knowledge of most commanders involved in the Battle of Britain; the young fighter pilots of WWI would take centre stage in commanding the air forces of WWII, and in
South African born, Battle of Britain ace, Sdn Ldr ‘Sailor’ Malan, CO 74 Sqn, August 1940 ended the war having scored 27 kills.
particular, of what was subsequently to be known as the Battle of Britain. Why did the Luftwaffe at the most critical moment of the battle, when the RAF Fighter Command was on its knees, sacrifice the Principles of War; why did they shift their objective of eliminating the RAF Fighter Command to the bombing of London? The answers lie not so much in strategic thinking, but the personalities and organisational politics that plagued both the RAF and Luftwaffe. History, however, provides clear evidence that failure by strategists and politicians to fully comply with the ‘Principles of War’, proved devastating for Germany. Heresy, possibly? It would not be wrong to conclude that Britain did not win the Battle of Britain, rather, that Germany lost the Battle of Britain. After a build-up of several months, the decisive day of the Battle was 15 September 1940. The Luftwaffe attacked by day in huge numbers expecting to sweep
Britain did not win the Battle of Britain, rather, Germany lost the Battle of Britain the RAF from the skies, but the RAF fought them off. At one point, every available fighter was in the sky – when Churchill, monitoring operations from Uxbridge, 11 Group’s Operations Rooms asked Air Vice Marshal Park: “What reserves are left?” the shocking reply was “None sir!” Like two punch drunk boxers, the Luftwaffe was also approaching the limit of its ability to sustain such attacks and losses for an extended period when in November 1940, Hitler, tiring of Goering’s empty
promises, postponed the attack on Britain. If only they had had accurate intelligence to realise to what extent they had sapped out the last bit of resistance from the RAF, who knows what the world would look like today. Under the aggressive leadership and inspirational wisdom of Winston Churchill, the British people stood resolute and defiant that they would fight and the Nazis would be defeated. A robust psychological approach by the population, coupled to leading edge technological innovation, transcended the theoretical ‘paper odds’ and resulted in a major victory for the British people. PERSONALITIES OF THE BATTLE
Wars are essentially driven by national ego or the fight for resources or territory, which in turn implies personalities at both the political, and military level. At the political level, the battle was between
FlightCom Magazine
41
Hitler and Churchill; at the military level, the battle between Reich Marshal Goering and the RAFs Air Vice Marshal Dowding, Commander-in-Chief Fighter Command. Stuck between these personality groupings was the technological advancements developed during the pre-war years that would be the determinants of success or failure. If there was one particular differentiator between the two sides, it was the superior strategic thinking of Dowding vs that of Hitler’s right hand man, Goering. What was it that made Hitler place so much faith in Goering’s decisions? Goering’s successes as a fighter pilot in WWI and his employment strategy of the air force in the Blitzkrieg, would surely have convinced Hitler that in Goering, he had a visionary leader, a military commander that could provide a military solution to the goals of Germany in regaining its stature after the humiliation suffered under the harsh conditions of the surrender Treaty of Versailles. After all, it was Goering that drove the revival of Germany’s air power and rebuilding of the Luftwaffe and his support to Hitler in 1935 in renouncing all the restrictions of Versailles. The Luftwaffe’s successful
Pilots scramble to their Hurricanes - which was the mainstay of the British defence as the Spitfire was not yet available in the numbers needed.
42
FlightCom Magazine
tactical involvement in 1936 in Spain in support of Franco and the defeat of Poland in one month brought on by the aerial triumph, led Goering to convince Hitler that every major offensive would in future be spearheaded by the pilots of the Luftwaffe. One of the lesser known names that featured most prominently in the strategic decision making on the German side, was Colonel ‘Beppo’ Schmid, an Army officer promoted to Head of Luftwaffe Intelligence. The performance of Luftwaffe air intelligence prior to and during the Battle of Britain was seriously flawed and perhaps doomed it to failure from the outset. Poor organisation and staffing combined with the dysfunctionality of the Nazi “system” resulted in an almost complete absence of coordination amongst the various intelligence agencies. All combined to help ensure defeat. ‘Chastise the bearer of unhappy tidings’. If not the motto of the Nazi regime, certainly this was the apparent attitude of many individuals, including Hitler and Goering; they demonstrated a dislike of intelligence reports that did not fit their own personal visions with the result that intelligence analysis
was often watered down to reach conclusions more acceptable to the intended reader. Thus, the reputation of Col “Beppo” Schmid, evolved within the Luftwaffe for garnishing his reports to make them more palatable to Goering. During interrogation in 1945, General Adolf Galland was less diplomatic, calling Schmid a “complete washout as an intelligence officer, the most important job of all.” GERMAN INTELLIGENCE APPRECIATION
For Goering’s Luftwaffe, during the euphoric pre-Dunkirk period, no task was too great. However ominous indicators existed but glossed over: the loss rates against the British during the air battles above Dunkirk were either ignored or overwhelmed by the positive optimism resulting from earlier military successes, in fact, the weaknesses in intelligence both mirrored and contributed to a fatal overconfidence throughout the German High Command. Hitler’s own conviction that the British were weak and would capitulate and accept overtures for peace, either before or after a short air offensive, definitely affected Luftwaffe thinking. Assessments of raid results were almost always overstated. For example, following the raids on 17 August, Luftwaffe intelligence claimed 11 airfields permanently destroyed with another 12 severely damaged. All of these airfields were in fact operational. Three times the actual British loss rates were claimed by German intelligence during the crucial August-September time period, while German losses, which were also high, were not accurately reported on by Intelligence. Even within the Luftwaffe, considerable confusion developed between Luftflotten 2 and 3. Kesselring claimed that Fighter Command had been destroyed, while Sperrle claimed it had 1,000 aircraft. Based on the ‘inaccurate intelligence’, the optimistic view once again prevailed, supported by Goering, which
contributed to the German decision to shift targeting from Fighter Command airfields, factories and radar stations, to London. STRATEGIC ERRORS
Strategic Error 1 – Goering’s Perceptions. The first major error Hitler made was to take Goering’s advice in May 1940 and order a halt by advancing German forces on Dunkirk; this decision was based on a promise by Goering to Hitler that the air force could finish the job through a Blitzkrieg at Dunkirk. Chain Home radar installation at Poling, Sussex, 1945.
It was not only a moral victory for Britain, but more than 350,000 soldiers and airmen were saved to counter German efforts at defeating Britain. It is clear that Goering was riding high on the euphoria of the Blitzkrieg, but had no real idea of the capabilities and resources of Britain, and certainly did not believe Britain had any real chance of resisting the rolling advance of the German forces. The timescales allotted for the invasion plans for Britain was for the Luftwaffe to gain air superiority over a period of four days for the air battle and four weeks to defeat what was left, demonstrating his contempt for the RAF capabilities. Strategic Error 2 – The Spitfire. The Hurricanes were no competition for the Bf-109 and although the
FlightCom Magazine
43
The Chain Home radar station coverage and airfields. FlightCom Magazine
44
technological advances of Britain in post war Europe were well known to the Germans, and also that the Spitfire was under development, no real importance was given to the impact of the Spitfire on the ability of the Bf-109s to protect the Luftwaffe bombers. The Spitfire lacked power reserves but it possessed a better close-in fighting potential due to its turn-in capability. After Dunkirk, Goering, using attacks on shipping convoys to evaluate RAF Fighter Command’s ability to respond, seemed to have learnt nothing from the RAF’s response and the Spitfire’s combat performance against the Bf-109. The Spitfire thus posed the greatest threat to the Luftwaffe bombing campaign.
By September 1940, serious conflict existed within the Luftwaffe; bomber losses had mounted, which Goering, in his failure to reduce such losses, blamed on inadequate fighter cover. To satisfy his frustrations, the fighter escort was ordered by Goering to fly at the same altitude as the bombers, thereby removing the Bf-109s flexibility. The fighter escort lost the advantage of height and were forced to weave and not allowed to leave the bombers, even if they had RAF fighters visual. This enraged Galland; squadrons of Luftwaffe bombers with a ‘lame’ fighter escort a mile behind; amazingly poor tactics of fighter escort providing the Spitfires with a huge tactical advantage which cost lives of German fighter pilots. Add to this the approximately 15 minutes fuel limit of ‘time over target’ available to the Bf-109, and it becomes evident that inadequate protection would be available to the bombers, the main strike force with which the Luftwaffe intended to bring the RAFs Fighter Command, and Britain, to its knees. Strategic Error 3 - Radar. Perhaps the greatest failure was the German conclusions about the effectiveness of the British, Chain Home, radar stations. General Martini’s 3d Abteilung signals intelligence, using the airship Graf Zeppelin,
had detected British radar before the outbreak of hostilities. Did Colonel Schmid, as a non-pilot, fail to grasp the significance of radar’s potential? In any event, little emphasis was placed on sustained attacks against the British early warning system. As the battle progressed, Schmid became aware that radar information was being passed to RAF fighters by radio. This served to confirm his earlier conclusions and, in his ignorance of air power, he remained convinced that the mass attacks being conducted by the Luftwaffe would overload what he considered to be an “inflexible” command and control system. In fact, the British Command and Control system, developed during the pre-war years under the astute Dowding, was a ‘first generation’
Hitler believed that the working classes could be incited against the rich ruling class to bring about a revolution net-centric system in which the sensor information provided by radar and visual sightings was fed into a centralised, command and control system which detected and tracked massed formations of German aircraft. Dowding implicitly understood Rule Number 1 of air defence: early warning was an essential element of any air defence campaign. Further supporting Schmid’s flawed conclusions about radar was the effectiveness of an undetected deception plan derived from a British policy to continue transmitting from damaged radar sites. Thus, radar sites that were incapable of receiving information, continued to transmit signals. The German signals intelligence was deceived into thinking that the bombing of radar stations which was undertaken early in the campaign was ineffective.
FlightCom Magazine
45
In concert with pilot reports that “led the Germans to believe that the vitals of the radar stations were located in bomb proof bunkers”, the decision was finally made to discontinue attacks against the radar sites altogether. The only conclusion one can reach is that Goering did not understand the advantages of early warning radar with 120 mile range coverage which provided the RAF with an element of surprise the Luftwaffe pilots could not understand. One Luftwaffe pilot, in
Command and Control was key to the RAF victory - the interior of RAF Fighter Command's Sector 'G' Operations Room at Duxford, 1940.
his mission debriefing reported that: “Spitfires strike with astonishing suddenness.” Strategic Error 4 – Target Selection. The analysis of Great Britain as established by Studie Blau formed the foundation of the bomber offensive conducted during the Battle of Britain. In addition, an “England Committee” was established to provide specialised guidance on target selection to the Luftwaffe. Although target lists were prepared by the Luftwaffe, the final decisions seem to have been made on the spot by Goering and Jeschonnek. This created considerable confusion within the Intelligence and Leadership communities of the Luftwaffe over the choice of targets for a strategic campaign. Intelligence weaknesses had earlier been 46
FlightCom Magazine
identified when, in 1936, the director of operations of the Luftwaffe General Staff identified the lack of good intelligence as having “very great significance in a bombing war.” This director further established that the current knowledge and experience within the military was inadequate to properly identify the relative vulnerability of “technical-industrial” systems. Throughout the Battle of Britain, there was “a preference for the choice of a large number of targets for simultaneous attack as a precaution, lest one important target be left out, rather than concentrating on the most important targets”. One point appears to have received singular agreement within the German High Command. The common belief arose from the experiences of World War One that civilian populations could be driven to panic, even revolution, as the direct result of aerial bombing. Goering and Jeschonnek obviously shared this view, as did the England Committee. Hitler and the England Committee believed that the poorer working classes could “be incited against the rich ruling class to bring about a revolution”. This ideological and sociological viewpoint remained ingrained in the Luftwaffe leadership’s thinking until the end of the war and had a major influence on the decision to change the original plan to destroy the RAF Fighter Command and rather bomb London. Apparently no specific priority for the destruction of the identified target types was established. The focus was to be on those targets having the greatest effects upon the population. Again, the dominant influence of the German belief in the “fear of aerial bombardment” is evident. Furthermore, by midOctober Goering would personally order “frequent changes of targets in order to achieve the necessary effect on the population of London and to confront the enemy’s defences with a new situation.” Strategic Error 5 – Force Levels. Without actually realising it, the German High Command, based
on the expeditionary offensive against the Low Countries, had created a tactical air force; one in which light bombers and light fighters, both with limited range, were used for the Blitzkrieg. Taking on strategic warfare with a tactical air force prevented the Luftwaffe from optimising its strike force for maximum effect with the limitations of range and bomb load, significantly reducing the potential to achieve its objectives. It’s not for nothing that the Allied Air Force’s strategic component developed ‘heavy’ four engine bombers with long range escorts; for example B-17s and P-51 Mustangs. One month after the high-point of the bombings, the Chief of the Operational Staff, General Jeschonnek, stated that England’s
destruction would require an air fleet four times as large as the Third Reich possessed. A statement of that kind revealed once again the sheer foolishness of the German High Command’s appreciation and estimations of the extent of conducting such an operation. PRINCIPLES OF WAR
In the final analysis, it is clear that inadequate regard was paid by the Luftwaffe to the ‘Principles
of War’, more particularly, Selection and Maintenance of the Aim, that is, the main principle in conducting warfare was weakly pursued. No real compliance was evident in the other principles such as: Maintenance of Morale, Offensive Action, Security, Surprise, Concentration of Force,
Economy of Effort, Flexibility and Sustainability. This clearly reveals the extent to which the RAF, strategically and tactically, were destined not to lose the Battle of Britain. The performance of the RAF can best be summarised by Churchill’s speech to the nation on 18 June 1940. Following on from the British Army’s miraculous evacuation from Dunkirk, and realising the precarious position Britain found itself in:
“The Battle of France is over – I expect that the Battle of Britain is about to begin. The whole fury and might of the enemy must very soon be upon us... Let us therefore, brace ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will say, “This was their finest hour””.
The slower thicker wing of the Hurricane is evident compared to the sleek Bf-109.
FlightCom Magazine
47
BACKPAGE DIR DIRECT ECTORY ORY A1A Flight Examiner (Loutzavia) Jannie Loutzis 012 567 6775 / 082 416 4069 jannie@loutzavia.co.za www.loutzavia.co.za
Alpi Aviation SA Dale De Klerk 082 556 3592 dale@alpiaviation.co.za www.alpiaviation.co.za
Adventure Air Lande Milne 012 543 3196 / Cell: 066 4727 848 l.milne@venture-sa.co.za www.ventureglobal.biz
Apco (Ptyd) Ltd Tony/Henk + 27 12 543 0775 apcosupport@mweb.co.za www.apcosa.co.za
Comporob Composite Repair & Manufacture Felix Robertson 072 940 4447 083 265 3602 comporob@lantic.net www.comporob.co.za Corporate-Aviators/Affordable Jet Sales Mike Helm 082 442 6239 corporate-aviators@iafrica.com www.corporate-aviators.com
Flying Frontiers Craig Lang 082 459 0760 CraigL@fairfield.co.za C. W. Price & Co www.flyingfrontiers.com AES (Cape Town) Aref Avionics Kelvin L. Price Erwin Erasmus Hannes Roodt 011 805 4720 Flying Unlimited Flight School (Pty) Ltd 082 494 3722 082 462 2724 cwp@cwprice.co.za Riaan Struwig erwin@aeroelectrical.co.za arefavionics@border.co.za www.cwprice.co.za 082 653 7504 / 086 770 8376 www.aeroelectrical.co.za riaan@ppg.co.za Atlas Aviation Lubricants Dart Aeronautical www.ppg.co.za AES (Johannesburg) Steve Cloete Jaco Kelly Danie van Wyk 011 917 4220 011 827 8204 Foster Aero International 011 701 3200 Fax: 011 917 2100 dartaero@mweb.co.za Dudley Foster office@aeroelectrical.co.za Sales.aviation@atlasoil.co.za 011 659 2533 www.aeroelectrical.co.za www.atlasoil.africa Dart Aircraft Electrical info@fosteraero.co.za Mathew Joubert www.fosteraero.co.za Aerocore ATNS 011 827 0371 Jacques Podde Percy Morokane Dartaircraftelectrical@gmail.com Gemair 082 565 2330 011 607 1234 www.dartaero.co.za Andries Venter jacques@aerocore.co.za percymo@atns.co.za 011 701 2653 / 082 905 5760 www.aerocore.co.za www.atns.com DJA Aviation Insurance andries@gemair.co.za 011 463 5550 Aero Engineering & PowerPlant Aviation Direct 0800Flying GIB Aviation Insurance Brokers Andre Labuschagne Andrea Antel mail@dja-aviation.co.za Richard Turner 012 543 0948 011 465 2669 www.dja-aviation.co.za 011 483 1212 aeroeng@iafrica.com info@aviationdirect.co.za aviation@gib.co.za www.aviationdirect.co.za Dynamic Propellers www.gib.co.za Aero Services (Pty) Ltd Andries Visser Chris Scott Avtech Aircraft Services 011 824 5057 Gryphon Flight Academy 011 395 3587 Riekert Stroh 082 445 4496 Jeffrey Von Holdt chris@aeroservices.co.za 082 555 2808 / 082 749 9256 andries@dynamicpropeller.co.za 011 701 2600 www.aeroservices.co.za avtech1208@gmail.com www.dynamicpropellers.co.za info@gryphonflight.co.za www.gryphonflight.co.za Aeronav Academy BAC Aviation AMO 115 Eagle Aviation Helicopter Division Donald O’Connor Micky Joss Tamryn van Staden Guardian Air 011 701 3862 035 797 3610 082 657 6414 011 701 3011 info@aeronav.co.za monicad@bacmaintenance.co.za tamryn@eaglehelicopter.co.za 082 521 2394 www.aeronav.co.za www.eaglehelicopter.co.za ops@guardianair.co.za Blackhawk Africa www.guardianair.co.za Aeronautical Aviation Cisca de Lange Eagle Flight Academy Clinton Carroll 083 514 8532 Mr D. J. Lubbe Heli-Afrique cc 011 659 1033 / 083 459 6279 cisca@blackhawk.aero 082 557 6429 Tino Conceicao clinton@aeronautical.co.za www.blackhawk.aero training@eagleflight.co.za 083 458 2172 www.aeronautical.co.za www.eagleflight.co.za tino.conceicao@heli-afrique.co.za Blue Chip Flight School Aerotric (Pty) Ltd Henk Kraaij Elite Aviation Academy Henley Air Richard Small 012 543 3050 Jacques Podde Andre Coetzee 083 488 4535 bluechip@bluechip-avia.co.za 082 565 2330 011 827 5503 aerotric@aol.com www.bluechipflightschool.co.za info@eliteaa.co.za andre@henleyair.co.za www.eliteaa.co.za www.henleyair.co.za Aircraft Assembly and Upholstery Centre Border Aviation Club & Flight School Tony/Siggi Bailes Liz Gous Emperor Aviation Hover Dynamics 082 552 6467 043 736 6181 Paul Sankey Phillip Cope anthony@rvaircraft.co.za admin@borderaviation.co.za 082 497 1701 / 011 824 5683 074 231 2964 www.rvaircraft.co.za www.borderaviation.co.za paul@emperoraviation.co.za info@hover.co.za www.emperoraviation.co.za www.hover.co.za Aircraft Finance Corporation Breytech Aviation cc Jaco Pietersen 012 567 3139 Enstrom/MD Helicopters Indigo Helicopters +27 [0]82 672 2262 Willie Breytenbach Andrew Widdall Gerhard Kleynhans jaco@airfincorp.co.za admin@breytech.co.za 011 397 6260 082 927 4031 / 086 528 4234 www.airfincorp.co.za aerosa@safomar.co.za veroeschka@indigohelicopters.co.za Bundu Aviation www.safomar.co.za www.indigohelicopters.co.za Aircraft Maintenance @ Work Phillip Cronje Opelo / Frik 083 485 2427 Era Flug Flight Training IndigoSat South Africa - Aircraft Tracking 012 567 3443 info@bunduaviation.co.za Pierre Le Riche Gareth Willers frik@aviationatwork.co.za_ www.bunduaviation.co.za 021 934 7431 08600 22 121 opelonke@aviationatwork.co.za info@era-flug.com sales@indigosat.co.za Celeste Sani Pak & Inflight Products www.era-flug.com www.indigosat.co.za Aircraft Maintenance International Steve Harris Pine Pienaar 011 452 2456 Execujet Africa Integrated Avionic Solutions 083 305 0605 admin@chemline.co.za 011 516 2300 Gert van Niekerk gm@aminternational.co.za www.chemline.co.za enquiries@execujet.co.za 082 831 5032 www.execujet.com gert@iasafrica.co.za Aircraft Maintenance International Cape Aircraft Interiors www.iasafrica.co.za Wonderboom Sarel Schutte Federal Air Thomas Nel 021 934 9499 Nick Lloyd-Roberts International Flight Clearances 082 444 7996 michael@wcaeromarine.co.za 011 395 9000 Steve Wright admin@aminternational.co.za www.zscai.co.za shuttle@fedair.com 076 983 1089 (24 Hrs) www.fedair.com flightops@flyifc.co.za Air Line Pilots’ Association Cape Town Flying Club www.flyifc.co.za Sonia Ferreira Beverley Combrink Ferry Flights int.inc. 011 394 5310 021 934 0257 / 082 821 9013 Michael (Mick) Schittenhelm Investment Aircraft alpagm@iafrica.com info@capetownflyingclub.co.za 082 442 6239 Quinton Warne www.alpa.co.za www.@capetownflyingclub.co.za ferryflights@ferry-flights.com 082 806 5193 www.ferry-flights.com aviation@lantic.net Airshift Aircraft Sales Capital Air www.investmentaircraft.com Eugene du Plessis Micaella Vinagre Fireblade Aviation 082 800 3094 011 827 0335 010 595 3920 Jabiru Aircraft eugene@airshift.co.za micaella@capitalairsa.com info@firebladeaviation.com Len Alford www.airshift.co.za www.capitalairsa.com www.firebladeaviation.com 044 876 9991 / 044 876 9993 info@jabiru.co.za Airvan Africa Century Avionics cc Flight Training College www.jabiru.co.za Patrick Hanly Carin van Zyl Cornell Morton 082 565 8864 011 701 3244 044 876 9055 Jim Davis Books airvan@border.co.za sales@centuryavionics.co.za ftc@flighttrainning.co.za Jim Davis www.airvan.co.za www.centuryavionics.co.za www.flighttraining.co.za 072 188 6484 jim@border.co.za Algoa Flying Club Chemetall Flight Training Services www.jimdavis.co.za Sharon Mugridge Wayne Claassens Amanda Pearce 041 581 3274 011 914 2500 011 805 9015/6 Joc Air T/A The Propeller Shop info@algoafc.co.za wayne.claassens@basf.com amanda@fts.co.za Aiden O’Mahony www.algoafc.co.za www.chemetall.com www.fts.co.za 011 701 3114 jocprop@iafrica.com Alpha One Aviation Chem-Line Aviation & Celeste Products Fly Jetstream Aviation Opelo Steve Harris Henk Kraaij Kishugu Aviation 082 301 9977 011 452 2456 083 279 7853 +27 13 741 6400 on@alphaoneaviation.co.za sales@chemline.co.za charter@flyjetstream.co.za comms@kishugu.com www.alphaoneaviation.co.za www.chemline.co.za www.flyjetstream.co.za www.kishugu.com/kishugu-aviation
48
FlightCom Magazine
Kit Planes for Africa Stefan Coetzee 013 793 7013 info@saplanes.co.za www.saplanes.co.za
MS Aviation Gary Templeton 082 563 9639 gary.templeton@msaviation.co.za www.msaviation.co.za
Kzn Aviation (Pty) Ltd Melanie Jordaan 031 564 6215 mel@kznaviation.co.za www.kznaviation.co.za
Skyhorse Aviation Ryan Louw 012 809 3571 info@skyhorse.co.za www.skyhorse.co.za
United Flight Support Clinton Moodley/Jonathan Wolpe 076 813 7754 / 011 788 0813 ops@unitedflightsupported.com www.unitedflightsupport.com
North East Avionics Keith Robertson +27 13 741 2986 keith@northeastavionics.co.za deborah@northeastavionics.co.za www.northeastavionics.co.za Landing Eyes Gavin Brown Orsmond Aviation 031 202 5703 058 303 5261 info@landingeyes.co.za info@orsmondaviation.co.za www.landingeyes.com www.orsmondaviation.co.za Lanseria Aircraft Interiors Owenair (Pty) Ltd Francois Denton Clive Skinner 011 659 1962 / 076 810 9751 082 923 9580 francois@aircraftcompletions.co.za clive.skinner@owenair.co.za www.owenwair.co.za Lanseria International Airport Mike Christoph Pacair 011 367 0300 Wayne Bond mikec@lanseria.co.za 033 386 6027 www.lanseria.co.za pacair@telkomsa.net
Skyworx Aviation Kevin Hopper kevin@skyworx.co.za www.skyworxaviation.co.za
Legend Sky 083 860 5225 / 086 600 7285 info@legendssky.co.za www.legendsky.co.za
PFERD-South Africa (Pty) Ltd Hannes Nortman 011 230 4000 hannes.nortman@pferd.co.za www.pferd.com
Southern Energy Company (Pty) Ltd Elke Bertram +264 8114 29958 johnnym@sec.com.na www.sec.com.na
Litson & Associates (Pty) Ltd OGP, BARS, Resources Auditing & Aviation Training karen.litson@litson.co.za Phone: 27 (0) 21 8517187 www.litson.co.za
Pipistrel Kobus Nel 083 231 4296 kobus@pipistrelsa.co.za www.pipistrelsa.co.za
Southern Rotorcraft cc Mr Reg Denysschen Tel no: 0219350980 sasales@rotors-r-us.com www.rotors-r-us.com
Plane Maintenance Facility Johan 083 300 3619 pmf@myconnection.co.za
Sport Plane Builders Pierre Van Der Walt 083 361 3181 pmvdwalt@mweb.co.za
Precision Aviation Services Marnix Hulleman 012 543 0371 marnix@pasaviation.co.za www.pasaviation.co.za PSG Aviation Reon Wiese 0861 284 284 reon.wiese@psg.co.za www.psg aviation.co.za
Starlite Aero Sales Klara Fouché +27 83 324 8530 / +27 31 571 6600 klaraf@starliteaviation.com www.starliteaviation.com
Rainbow SkyReach (Pty) Ltd Mike Gill 011 817 2298 Mike@fly-skyreach.com www.fly-skyreach.com Rand Airport Stuart Coetzee 011 827 8884 stuart@randairport.co.za www.randairport.co.za Robin Coss Aviation Robin Coss 021 934 7498 info@cossaviation.com www.cossaviation.co.za
Starlite Aviation Training Academy Durban: +27 31 571 6600 Mossel Bay: +27 44 692 0006 train@starliteaviation.com www.starliteaviation.com
Litson & Associates Risk Management Services (Pty) Ltd. eSMS-S/eTENDER/ eREPORT/Advisory Services karen.litson@litson.co.za Phone: 27 (0) 8517187 www.litson.co.za Loutzavia Aircraft Sales Henry Miles 082 966 0911 henry@loutzavia.co.za www.loutzavia.co.za Loutzavia Flight Training Gerhardt Botha 012 567 6775 ops@loutzavia.co.za www.loutzavia.co.za Loutzavia-Pilots and Planes Maria Loutzis 012 567 6775 maria@loutzavia.co.za www.pilotsnplanes.co.za Loutzavia Rand Frans Pretorius 011 824 3804 rand@loutzavia.co.za www@loutzavia.co.za Lowveld Aero Club Pugs Steyn 013 741 3636 Flynow@lac.co.za Marshall Eagle Les Lebenon 011 958 1567 les@marshalleagle.co.za www.marshalleagle.co.za Maverick Air Charters Chad Clark 083 292 2270 Charters@maverickair.co.za www.maverickair.co.za MCC Aviation Pty Ltd Claude Oberholzer 011 701 2332 info@flymcc.co.za www.flymcc.co.za MH Aviation Services (Pty) Ltd Marc Pienaar 011 609 0123 / 082 940 5437 customerrelations@mhaviation.co.za www.mhaviation.co.za M and N Acoustic Services cc Martin de Beer 012 689 2007/8 calservice@mweb.co.za Metropolitan Aviation (Pty) Ltd Gert Mouton 082 458 3736 herenbus@gmail.com Money Aviation Angus Money 083 263 2934 angus@moneyaviation.co.za www.moneyaviation.co.za
SAA Technical (SOC) Ltd SAAT Marketing 011 978 9993 satmarketing@flysaa.com www.flysaa.com/technical SABRE Aircraft Richard Stubbs 083 655 0355 richardstubbs@mweb.co.za www.aircraftafrica.co.za SA Mooney Patrick Hanly 082 565 8864 samooney@border.co.za www.samooney.co.za Savannah Helicopters De Jager 082 444 1138 / 044 873 3288 dejager@savannahhelicopters.co.za www.savannahhelicopters.co.za Scenic Air Christa van Wyk +264 612 492 68 windhoek@scenic-air.com www.scenic-air.com Sheltam Aviation Durban Susan Ryan 083 505 4882 susanryan@sheltam.com www.sheltamaviation.com Sheltam Aviation PE Brendan Booker 082 497 6565 brendanb@sheltam.com www.sheltamaviation.com
Sky-Tech Heinz Van Staden 082 720 5210 sky-tech@telkomsa.net www.sky-tech.za.com Sling Aircraft Kim Bell-Cross 011 948 9898 sales@airplanefactory.co.za www.airplanefactory.co.za Solenta Aviation (Pty Ltd) Paul Hurst 011 707 4000 info@solenta.com www.solenta.com
Unique Air Charter Nico Pienaar 082 444 7994 nico@uniqueair.co.za www.uniqueair.co.za Unique Flight Academy Nico Pienaar 082 444 7994 nico@uniqueair.co.za www.uniqueair.co.za Van Zyl Aviation Services Colette van Zyl 012 997 6714 admin@vanzylaviationco.za www.vanzylaviation.co.za Vector Aerospace Jeff Poirier +902 888 1808 jeff.poirier@vectoraerospace.com www.vectoraerospace.com Velocity Aviation Collin Pearson 011 659 2306 / 011 659 2334 collin@velocityaviation.co.za www.velocityaviation.co.za Villa San Giovanni Luca Maiorana 012 111 8888 info@vsg.co.za www.vsg.co.za
Starlite Aviation Operations Trisha Andhee +27 82 660 3018/ +27 31 571 6600 trishaa@starliteaviation.com www.starliteaviation.com
Status Aviation (Pty) Ltd Richard Donian 074 587 5978 / 086 673 5266 info@statusaviation.co.za www.statusaviation.co.za Superior Pilot Services Liana Jansen van Rensburg 0118050605/2247 info@superiorair.co.za www.superiorair.co.za The Copter Shop Bill Olmsted 082 454 8555 execheli@iafrica.com www.execheli.wixsite.com/the-coptershop-sa Titan Helicopter Group 044 878 0453 info@titanhelicopters.com www.titanhelicopters.com TPSC Dennis Byrne 011 701 3210 turboprop@wol.co.za Trio Helicopters & Aviation cc CR Botha or FJ Grobbelaar 011 659 1022
Vortx Aviation Bredell Roux 072 480 0359 info@vortx.co.za www.vortxaviation.com Wagtail Aviation Johan van Ludwig 082 452 8194 acrochem@mweb.co.za www.wagtail.co.za Wanafly Adrian Barry 082 493 9101 adrian@wanafly.net www.wanafly.co.za Windhoek Flight Training Centre Thinus Dreyer 0026 40 811284 180 pilots@flywftc.com www.flywftc.com Wings n Things Wendy Thatcher 011 701 3209 wendy@wingsnthings.co.za www.wingsnthings.co.za Witbank Flight School Andre De Villiers 083 604 1718 andredv@lantic.net www.waaflyingclub.co.za Wonderboom Airport Peet van Rensburg 012 567 1188/9 peet@wonderboomairport.co.za www.wonderboomairport.co.za Zandspruit Bush & Aero Estate Martin Den Dunnen 082 449 8895 martin@zandspruit.co.za www.zandspruit.co.za Zebula Golf Estate & SPA Reservations 014 734 7700 reception@zebula.co.za www.zebula.co.za
stoffel@trioavi.co.za/frans@trioavi.co.za
www.trioavi.co.za Tshukudu Trailers Pieter Visser 083 512 2342 deb@tshukudutrailers.co.za www.tshukudutrailers.co.za U Fly Training Academy Nikola Puhaca 011 824 0680 ufly@telkomsa.net www.uflyacademy.co.za United Charter cc Jonathan Wolpe 083 270 8886 jonathan.wolpe@unitedcharter.co.za www.unitedcharter.co.za
FlightCom Magazine
49
50
FlightCom Magazine