24 | DISTINCTIONS |
Horst Witthueser AIPF
DISTINCTIONS I submitted my Associate level assessment panel to the RPS on June this year. Unfortunately, it was not accepted. Horst Witthueser AIPS Although the panel was praised for its presentation, technical deficiencies were criticized: “The assessors applauded the interesting and novel idea, they also commended the applicant on the Statement of Intent, which was accurately reflected in the submitted images. It was interesting to see a mix of the
024 / 3RD QUARTER 2021 / eMAGAZINE
literal and the abstract which was commented on by several assessors. Despite this variation, the presentation was seen as cohesive and consistent. The balance of the images was similarly favorably commented on, and the transition from the blue images on the top row to the amber images in the middle and bottom rows
was also appreciated. Whilst the applicant clearly demonstrated an individual vision and a sound aesthetic awareness, concerns were raised about certain technical issues. (halo, over sharpening) There is much to admire in this submission, but it is important that the highlighted technical weaknesses are addressed.”
