Photo/Dennis Myers
Washoe Schools Superintendent Pedro Martinez chatted at the Harrah’s Auto Collection after holding one of the school district’s “brown bag lunch” meetings.
Stop us if you’ve heard this one WalletHub, which calls itself the “social network for your wallet,” has ranked Nevada near the bottom in the nation in education. Because it is oriented to personal finance, WalletHub monitors quality of life factors that can affect success and from time to time releases lists like “Best and Worst Cities for First-Time Home Buyers.” In this case, it monitored factors like math and reading scores, percent of children who repeat grades. It also assesses safety factors in schools such as number of reported bullying incidents. In a ranking of school systems, Nevada placed 47 among the 50 states and D.C., the same ranking it had last year. The only states placing lower on the list than Nevada are Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi—states that frequently share the bottom of national rankings with Nevada—plus D.C. In the school safety ranking, Nevada did better, placing 36. WalletHub also said there is evidence of a correlation between the money states spent on schools and financial success: “[S] tates that invest more dollars in education benefit not only their residents but also their economies. The Economic Policy Institute, or EPI, reported that income is higher in states where the workforce is well educated and hence more productive. With higher incomes, workers in turn can contribute more in taxes to beef up state budgets over the long run.”
Sounds more like Nevada Scientists at the University of California, Davis, reported last week that the state of California has allocated five times as much water as the state actually has. “[W]ater-rights allocations exceed the state’s actual surface water supply by about 300 million acre-feet, enough to fill Lake Tahoe about 2.5 times,” according to a Davis statement. Contributing to the problem, the scientists said, are a complicated, backlogged allocation system, retroactive applications, inaccurate reporting and deliberate overestimates by applicants.
Fire sale Congressional leaders of political parties are expected to serve as fire hydrants for political dogs of all kinds. Nevada’s U.S. Sen. Harry Reid serves that purpose in ways that reference things he never did (“Where’s Harry?” RN&R, Aug. 21) as well as things he actually has done. The website of the Republican National Committee (RNC), under the headline “Want Keystone? Fire Reid,” ran a long polemic blaming Reid for problems in getting the Keystone XL oil pipeline constructed. The XL is a supplement to the already existing Keystone pipeline between Canada and the U.S. Gulf Coast. President Obama supports the XL, but the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has raised concerns about the adequacy of the environmental impact statement, and the New York Times published reports on legal authorities who questioned the impartiality of analysis of the project. Reid has disagreed with Obama and has voted against the project in some cases and the GOP faults him for not bringing legislation to circumvent legal processes to a vote. “Firing” Reid is a meme the RNC has been trying to promote lately on various issues and while he has not addressed the XL in this context, his campaign committee has turned it into a couple of fund-raising letters under his name: “The GOP wants to fire me. At least, that’s what they’re saying in their latest robocall attack. It’s not surprising. I’ve exposed their backers—Charles and David Koch—for funneling money to buy our democracy. I keep badgering them to take action on real issues like raising the minimum wage and protecting women’s access to contraception. Now they’re calling up people and attacking me for trying to do something good for the middle class? I can live with that. But I can’t fight against it without your help.”
—Dennis Myers
8 | RN&R |
AUGUST 28, 2014
Was it race? A suspicion lingers Since the dispute over Washoe County Schools Superintendent Pedro Martinez began, Latino leaders have been prominent in by support of him and of a school board Dennis Myers member, Estela Gutierrez. Martinez was put on paid leave by the Washoe County School Board in a closed meeting after he refused to participate in a contractual dispute over his accounting credentials and because the school board members were taken aback by his allegedly unprofessional demeanor when he was
“I cannot tell you that race is not a factor.” Maria Sheehan truckee Meadows Community College president confronted by the accusation about his credentials. It happened in the absence of school board member Gutierrez, who had not attended the meeting. No agenda item had informed the public such a thing was coming. After the superintendent was put on leave, the Latino Leaders Roundtable quickly organized a forum for Pedro Martinez and school board member Gutierrez to speak at. Latino leaders like Theresa Navarro and Leslie Mix have been prominent in calls for school board recall. Reader comments on some websites dwell on the ethnicity of the superintendent.
Does all this mean that the controversy is about race? “I cannot tell you that race is not a factor, if even from the standpoint of ethnic or cultural awareness, the necessity of having an individual so uniquely qualified to handle this growing, very challenging population,” said Truckee Meadows Community College president Maria Sheehan on Nevada Newsmakers on Aug. 4, who had spoken against the suspension of the superintendent. “The Latino population in fact is growing in our country, and we have a superintendent that knows from the inside how to be successful. Don’t we want to pass that on to our children? Aren’t we proud of having that? And so just that level of insensitivity of the need to address the kinds of challenges of this growing population, if just only from that level—.” Sheehan’s comments could not be overlooked, and program host Sam Shad gingerly tiptoed into trying to determine what she was saying. Shad: “OK, you realize you’ve made a very powerful statement here today, that you’re essentially accusing the board of racism.” Sheehan: “I am not doing that.” Shad asked her to elaborate. Sheehan: “Let’s be careful, let’s be careful about the semantics. In terms of insensitivity of the necessity of having a leader address the issue, that’s what I’m saying. Now, these board members are in a very difficult
position, and I did say that in my statement [at a public meeting], and I was careful to be respectful of them in my statement. But what we need now is resolution, not a deeper divide, not accusations of racism but a need to come together.” Shad: “So in a way—and I’m not trying to put you in bad light here— but it’s almost like reverse racism to say that, you know, you need to have somebody of Hispanic ethnicity … as the superintendent of this school district. That doesn’t seem to add up to me.” Sheehan: “No, and I’m not saying that. I’m saying that at this point in time, we have a uniquely qualified individual to handle some extreme challenges. Now, that could come from someone else that had that sensitivity. But today we’re in a place where we have someone, a leader, that can address challenges and move us forward.” It’s a tricky needle to thread, and a program like Shad’s where a newsmaker can be heard for more than a soundbite helps bring outshadings in a nuanced stance like Sheehan’s, as television news reports do not. But how many people will hear that interview? What most local residents know is that Latino leaders are in the forefront of the recall effort, and that sends a powerful message, a message those leaders have not sought to dampen. Does the fact that two of the players in the dispute—Martinez and Gutierrez—are Latino, in and of itself, mean that the race was a factor in the suspension of Martinez? Where is the evidence of racism beyond the fact the two are Latino? In other disputes of this sort, there is normally something more than mere ethnicity on the part of the players that fuels it. For instance, on Aug. 30, 2001, Southern Nevada Community College administrator Mike Meyer resigned after saying of the wife of a state legislator, “She’s a nigger, and niggers are never on time.” That statement was unambiguous. But there have been no reported antiLatino comments or actions on the part of the members of the Washoe school board, three of whom participated in hiring Martinez. School board chair Barbara Clark said she has never heard anyone on the board say anything racist, nor has she done so herself. “Absolutely not,” she said. Navarro said she believes race was a factor in the Martinez suspension, but also said she is unable to put her finger on any specific showing of it. She said she has been involved in working with the school district and
