News

Stop us if you’ve heard this one

WalletHub, which calls itself the “social network for your wallet,” has ranked Nevada near the bottom in the nation in education.

Because it is oriented to personal finance, WalletHub monitors quality of life factors that can affect success and from time to time releases lists like “Best and Worst Cities for First-Time Home Buyers.” In this case, it monitored factors like math and reading scores, percent of children who repeat grades. It also assesses safety factors in schools such as number of reported bullying incidents.

In a ranking of school systems, Nevada placed 47 among the 50 states and D.C., the same ranking it had last year. The only states placing lower on the list than Nevada are Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi—states that frequently share the bottom of national rankings with Nevada—plus D.C.

In the school safety ranking, Nevada did better, placing 36.

WalletHub also said there is evidence of a correlation between the money states spent on schools and financial success: “[S] tates that invest more dollars in education benefit not only their residents but also their economies. The Economic Policy Institute, or EPI, reported that income is higher in states where the workforce is well educated and hence more productive. With higher incomes, workers in turn can contribute more in taxes to beef up state budgets over the long run.”

Sounds more like Nevada

Scientists at the University of California, Davis, reported last week that the state of California has allocated five times as much water as the state actually has.

“[W]ater-rights allocations exceed the state’s actual surface water supply by about 300 million acre-feet, enough to fill Lake Tahoe about 2.5 times,” according to a Davis statement. Contributing to the problem, the scientists said, are a complicated, backlogged allocation system, retroactive applications, inaccurate reporting and deliberate overestimates by applicants.

Fire sale

Congressional leaders of political parties are expected to serve as fire hydrants for political dogs of all kinds. Nevada’s U.S. Sen. Harry Reid serves that purpose in ways that reference things he never did (“Where’s Harry?” RN&R, Aug. 21) as well as things he actually has done.

The website of the Republican National Committee (RNC), under the headline “Want Keystone? Fire Reid,” ran a long polemic blaming Reid for problems in getting the Keystone XL oil pipeline constructed. The XL is a supplement to the already existing Keystone pipeline between Canada and the U.S. Gulf Coast.

President Obama supports the XL, but the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has raised concerns about the adequacy of the environmental impact statement, and the New York Times published reports on legal authorities who questioned the impartiality of analysis of the project. Reid has disagreed with Obama and has voted against the project in some cases and the GOP faults him for not bringing legislation to circumvent legal processes to a vote.

“Firing” Reid is a meme the RNC has been trying to promote lately on various issues and while he has not addressed the XL in this context, his campaign committee has turned it into a couple of fund-raising letters under his name:

“The GOP wants to fire me. At least, that’s what they’re saying in their latest robocall attack. It’s not surprising. I’ve exposed their backers—Charles and David Koch—for funneling money to buy our democracy. I keep badgering them to take action on real issues like raising the minimum wage and protecting women’s access to contraception. Now they’re calling up people and attacking me for trying to do something good for the middle class? I can live with that. But I can’t fight against it without your help.” —Dennis Myers

Washoe Schools Superintendent Pedro Martinez  chatted at the Harrah’s Auto Collection after  holding one of the school district’s “brown bag  lunch” meetings.

Was it race?

A suspicion lingers

Since the dispute over Washoe County Schools Superintendent Pedro Martinez began, by Latino leaders have been prominent in Dennis Myers support of him and of a school board member, Estela Gutierrez. Martinez was put on paid leave by the Washoe County School Board in a closed meeting after he refused to participate in a contractual dispute over his accounting credentials and because the school board members were taken aback by his allegedly unprofessional demeanor when he was

“I cannot tell you that race is not a factor.”

Maria Sheehan truckee Meadows Community College president

confronted by the accusation about his credentials. It happened in the absence of school board member Gutierrez, who had not attended the meeting. No agenda item had informed the public such a thing was coming.

After the superintendent was put on leave, the Latino Leaders Roundtable quickly organized a forum for Pedro Martinez and school board member Gutierrez to speak at.

Latino leaders like Theresa Navarro and Leslie Mix have been prominent in calls for school board recall.

Reader comments on some websites dwell on the ethnicity of the superintendent.

Does all this mean that the controversy is about race?

“I cannot tell you that race is not a factor, if even from the standpoint of ethnic or cultural awareness, the necessity of having an individual so uniquely qualified to handle this growing, very challenging population,” said Truckee Meadows Community College president Maria Sheehan on Nevada Newsmakers on Aug. 4, who had spoken against the suspension of the superintendent. “The Latino population in fact is growing in our country, and we have a superintendent that knows from the inside how to be successful. Don’t we want to pass that on to our children? Aren’t we proud of having that? And so just that level of insensitivity of the need to address the kinds of challenges of this growing population, if just only from that level—.”

Sheehan’s comments could not be overlooked, and program host Sam Shad gingerly tiptoed into trying to determine what she was saying.

Shad: “OK, you realize you’ve made a very powerful statement here today, that you’re essentially accusing the board of racism.”

Sheehan: “I am not doing that.”

Shad asked her to elaborate.

Sheehan: “Let’s be careful, let’s be careful about the semantics. In terms of insensitivity of the necessity of having a leader address the issue, that’s what I’m saying. Now, these board members are in a very difficult position, and I did say that in my statement [at a public meeting], and I was careful to be respectful of them in my statement. But what we need now is resolution, not a deeper divide, not accusations of racism but a need to come together.”

Shad: “So in a way—and I’m not trying to put you in bad light here— but it’s almost like reverse racism to say that, you know, you need to have somebody of Hispanic ethnicity … as the superintendent of this school district. That doesn’t seem to add up to me.”

Sheehan: “No, and I’m not saying that. I’m saying that at this point in time, we have a uniquely qualified individual to handle some extreme challenges. Now, that could come from someone else that had that sensitivity. But today we’re in a place where we have someone, a leader, that can address challenges and move us forward.”

It’s a tricky needle to thread, and a program like Shad’s where a newsmaker can be heard for more than a soundbite helps bring outshadings in a nuanced stance like Sheehan’s, as television news reports do not. But how many people will hear that interview? What most local residents know is that Latino leaders are in the forefront of the recall effort, and that sends a powerful message, a message those leaders have not sought to dampen.

Does the fact that two of the players in the dispute—Martinez and Gutierrez—are Latino, in and of itself, mean that the race was a factor in the suspension of Martinez?

Where is the evidence of racism beyond the fact the two are Latino?

In other disputes of this sort, there is normally something more than mere ethnicity on the part of the players that fuels it. For instance, on Aug. 30, 2001, Southern Nevada Community College administrator Mike Meyer resigned after saying of the wife of a state legislator, “She’s a nigger, and niggers are never on time.”

That statement was unambiguous. But there have been no reported antiLatino comments or actions on the part of the members of the Washoe school board, three of whom participated in hiring Martinez. School board chair Barbara Clark said she has never heard anyone on the board say anything racist, nor has she done so herself.

“Absolutely not,” she said.

Navarro said she believes race was a factor in the Martinez suspension, but also said she is unable to put her finger on any specific showing of it. She said she has been involved in working with the school district and

has gotten a sense from some district staffers that there are members of the board who have a race problem, but was not able to cite anything concrete.

“I can’t pinpoint it for you,” she said. “I can only say it’s that feeling from some of the staff members, some of the people there. I haven’t heard any of the trustees [board members] say anything racist.”

But she remains convinced that race was a factor in the dispute.

“He [Martinez] is very popular with people in our community,” she said. “He has made changes for a lot of our kids.”

Clark said, “I was on the board that appointed Estela Gutierrez when Leslie [Porter] died. I was on the board that appointed Pedro Martinez as superintendent.”

She said the board obtained diversity funding from the legislature for a second person in the school district diversity office. It has ridden herd on “the cultural competency part of our mission”—making sure that everything from textbooks to the materials on classroom walls reflect the children who see them.

In addition, she said, the board has tried to address poverty among children, both of color and white, by increasing breakfast-in-the-classroom programs and free lunches.

She said she personally made sure that the public was given a chance to address redistricting when school board districts were redrawn after the last census (“The District’s districts,” RN&R, Sept. 1, 2011).

“And our actions and our words have reflected that belief system that every family and every child is valued. Not everybody believes that but this board believes it.”

Probably the most outspoken person on the role of race in the controversy is longtime civil rights activist Andrew Barbano, an NAACP officer who wrote in his Sparks Tribune column on July 31, “[School board member] Howard Rosenberg, who has fought discrimination all his life, stormed out of Tuesday’s board meeting in righteous rage. The suspended superintendent has uttered not one word to calm the waters. Playing the race card pays. Whenever former Reno City Manager Charles McNeely was getting well-deserved heat or wanted a raise, he would recruit local African Americans to show up at Reno City Hall. In all my years as a member, I never saw McNeely attend an NAACP meeting. I can understand opportunists playing the race card.”

Subsequently, Barbano sent a letter to Martinez, with a copy to Gov. Brian Sandoval: “Mr. Martinez, only you and the governor are in position to dampen this smoldering tinder. There is no evidence of ethnic or racial bias on [the part] of the school board. Playing the race card can be toxic. Will you issue a statement that racial/ ethnic bias are not part of the current situation between you and the board of trustees and that such unfounded allegations have no place in this discussion?”

So far, Martinez has not spoken on the topic. Gutierrez has done so, however, telling a July 26 meeting, “This not a racial thing.” Ω

That was then, this is now

At last week’s all-class reunion at Reno High School, some members of the class of 1965 tried to pick themselves out of a group class photo displayed in the RHS alumni building. All-class reunions are held every three years.

775.329.0711 CIRCUSRENO.COM

Must be 21 or older. Subject to NRS 463.362. Management reserves all rights. Circus Circus Hotel and Casino endorses responsible gaming. If you or someone you know has a problem gaming responsibly, please call the 24-hour Problem Gamblers HelpLine at 800.522.4700.