Use of Network Meta-Analysis in Clinical Guidelines - Scientific Research

Research paper

USE OF NETWORK METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL GUIDELINES A Description a n d Quality Assessm ent Tags: P u b r i c a | S t a t i s t i c a l A n a l y s i s | Scientific R e s e a r c h | M e t a - A n a l y s i s | N e t w o r k M e t a - A n a l y s i s | R a n d o m i z e d C o n t ro l l e d Tr i a l s | B a y e s i a n | Clinical R e s e a r c h | M e t a A n a l y s i s Models Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright © 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

META- ANALYSIS

Meta-analysis can be accomplished when several scientific studies that address the same issue, with each individual study record measurements assuming some degree of error.

0 1

Meta-analysis is a statistical analysis that incorporates several results of scientific research.

0 2

0 3

The goal is then to use statistical methods to extract a pooled approximation nearest to the unknown common truth based on the int erpretation of this error.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

NETWORK META- ANALYSIS (NMA)

Network meta-analysis compares multiple approaches simultaneously by evaluating experiments that make

01

different correlations in the same analysis.

02 The importance of network meta analysis lies in taking decisions explicitly instead of taking implicitly.

It is a difficult task to decide which one to choose when numerous treatment options are available.

03

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

TYPES OF NETWORK META- ANALYSIS Direct Treatment comparison Traditional meta-analysis which is performed using research groups that explicitly (headto head) evaluate the same two treatments.

1 2 INDIRECT TREATMENT COMPARISON Comparison of different approaches in health care using data from separate research.

Often used due to the dearth of evidence from headto-head comparative studies or insufficient evidence.

Compared to direct comparison within the study, indirect comparison implies a comparison of different procedures between the studies.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

EXAMPLE OF INDIRECT TREATMENT COMPARISON Using indirect treatment comparison, the advantage of A over B is obtained by means of comparing the trails of A vs C to that B vs C, even though this treatment fairly results in inaccurate estimates. Characterization of three or more comparison treatments as a structure of multiple comparison evidence are performed depending on the comparative studies conducted pair-wise.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

COMPARISON OF CLINICAL TRIALS USING NMA Available therapies are constantly increasing for many medical indications. For example, for the treatment of depression and other mental disorders, a wide range of different–old and new–medications are available.

Physicians, clinicians and health policymakers often have to find out the most cost-effective treatment.

Well performed randomized controlled trials provide the most accurate assessments of the comparative efficacy of competing for healthcare approaches.

In randomized controlled trials, most methods were not measured directly. If there is zero or inadequate data from direct comparison trials, the outcomes of different studies may be used to assess the effects of different treatments.

Standard meta-analysis acts as an effective tool for evidence base medicine in spite of its drawback of comparing only two alternative treatments at a time.

If there are no studies that compare two strategies explicitly, it is impossible to measure their comparative effectiveness.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright © 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

MIXED/MULTIPLE TREATMENT META-ANALYSES Multiple treatment meta-analysis therapies integrates both direct and indirect comparison data from a network of trials using multiple procedures to evaluate as widely and precisely as the possible findings of summary treatment.

1 2

Mixed/Multiple treatment comparison (MTC) is nothing but the generalized form of generic pair meta- analysis for A Vs B to that of data systems.

FOR EXAMPLE Consider the study on A Vs B, B Vs C and A Vs C. MTC performs two roles where it strengthens the relative effectiveness of two therapies using both direct and indirect comparisons and other one is to select the best treatment by simultaneously allowing all treatments interferences.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

Fig 1: Simple meta analysis

Fig 2: More complex network containing 6 interventions

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

NEED TO COMBINE DIRECT AND INDIRECT TREATMENT COMPARISON Combining direct and indirect may prove beneficial in some cases as given below: Results are not reliable When study quality is low Supported by manufacturer Research sizes A small number of trials In addition to that, Network-wide levels of reliability/inconsistency can be helpful and provide continuity across the entire treatment network.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

MEDICAL GUIDELINES WITH NMA Even though the network meta-analysis has been recently used for development of WHO guidelines, its approach is well known within national agencies for health technology evaluation.

01

02

In addition, NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) in the UK and Northern Ireland has incorporated recommendations on network meta-analysis within its clinical guidelines manual.

In 2015, GRADE published guidance on how GRADE can be used in combination with network meta-analysis.

03

“8% of 145 NICE clinical guidelines used network meta-analysis in 2012, but possibly the percentage has gone up today” Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright © 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

HOW TO USE NMA It is already mentioned that 8% out of 145 NICE clinical guideline use NMA. There are three types of interventions as shown in below figure.

Type of Interventions

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright © 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

NMA METHODOLOGIES FOLLOWED BY NICE CLINICAL GUIDELINE Comparison of point estimate Adjusted indirect comparison Bucher's adjusted indirect comparison Bayesian

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright © 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

ADVANTAGES OF NMA

0 1

Make comparisons that do not properly account for potential biases in research designs, characteristics of intervention and populations of study.

Opportunity to quantitatively evaluate the comparison of interventions which was not done directly in studies. This is essential to the development of guidelines as guideline design teams can rely more heavily on expert opinion in the absence of head-to-head.

0 2

0 3

Network meta-analyses for guideline development provides a parallel analysis of all possible treatment options and makes the use of the available evidence within a single review to the fullest extent.

Examines both direct and indirect evidence together means stronger evidence base – often to a degree that signifies the difference between grading the strength of evidence as low versus fair or high.

0 4

0 5

By doing so it offers a crispier evaluation of the clinical landscape that in effect is better suited for decision-making.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

CHALLENGES OF NMA

Network meta-analysis normally synthesizes evidence from only randomized controlled trials. But in the case of randomized controlled trials, hefty cohort studies are not captured.

Although absolute effects can be derived from relative effects, alternative analytical methods may be preferred. This may be pivotal especially for the evaluation of harmful drugs.

03

01

Network meta-analysis models do not mean relative effects, rather they mean than absolute effects.

02

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

SUMMARY

Clinical guidelines have growingly become evidence-based with the use of meticulous evidence synthesizing methods.

High-quality, in pairs meta-analyses, have been extensively used over the past decades, yet network meta-analysis approaches are gaining more importance to optimize the evaluation of competing interventions.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright Š 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

PUBRICA LAB @ PUBRICA.COM

www.pubrica.com

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright © 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved

PHONE NUMBER UK INDIA

: +44-1143520021 : +91-4448137070

EMAIL ADDRESS

Freelancer Consultant

sales@pubrica.com

Guest Blog Editor

GET IN TOUCH WITH US

CONTACT hr@workfoster.com

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Editing & Peer-Reviewing | Scientific Communication

Copyright © 2019 Pubrica. All rights reserved