Scientific Systematic Review writing services – Pubrica

COPYRIGHT © 2021 PUBRICA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Systematic Review Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

Systematic Review A systematic review is designed to summarise the results of available studies and provides a high level of evidence-based findings on the effectiveness of interventions.

Our experts can handle any type of research, whether you need systematic review based on controlled clinical trials or review based on observational study designs or community (e.g. psychology) intervention? Our experts at Pubrica, perform a rigorous systematic review by following multi-step process, which includes

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

Identifying a well-focused clinically relevant research question while following suitable frameworks including PICO, SPICE, SPIDER, and ECLIPSE etc.

Developing a detailed review protocol with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and registering the protocol at different registries such as The Campbell Collaboration, The Cochrane Collaboration, OSF Preregistration, SYREAF-systematic reviews for animals and food, Research Registry, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and PROSPERO.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

A systematic literature search of multiple databases (includes PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) in finding relevant references that further requires extensive search and study.

A number of other electronic databases and bibliographic sources will also be searched. Sources we posit for use for the project include:

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

Scientific literature databases as described above and others Cochrane Library Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) NHS Economic Evaluation database Material referenced in Publications obtained in the course of research on the topi

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) documents Clinical trials databases, including clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EU), clinicaltrials.gov (US) and others.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

However, using multiple databases to search relevant studies is laborious and time-consuming so that a well-designed search strategy will be developed.

Meticulous study identification using a variety of search terms, checking for a clear outcome (primary and secondary) Systematic data abstraction, by at least two sets of investigators independently, Risk of bias assessment with the use of existing different assessment tools (e.g. STROBE). For example, allocation concealment (selection bias), incomplete outcome data addressed (attrition bias), and selective reporting (reporting bias).

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

Thoughtful quantitative synthesis through meta-analysis where relevant.

Besides informing guidelines, credible systematic reviews and quality of evidence assessment can help identify key knowledge gaps for future studies.

We can help you with the most used qualitative systematic review, as well as, quantitative, health policy and management information and meta-analysis.

Our systematic review at Pubrica is more structured as at every stage of writing, and we ensure to critically check the rigour using standard methodological checklists such as PRISMA, CASP, AMSTAR, and ARIF etc., based on the checklist provided.

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

FURTHER, THE GENERAL STRUCTURE IS PRESENTED AS FOLLOWS: Formulate the research question Search for studies Selection of studies Data collection Methodological quality assessment Methods used for presenting results Findings are interpreted.

The time required for producing a quality systematic review

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing

Copyright © 2021 Pubrica. All rights reserved

Contact Us

Work With Us

UK: +44 1618186353

Freelancer Consultant Guest Blog Editor ( hr@workfoster.com )

INDIA: +91-9884350006 sales@pubrica.com

Publication Support | Research Services | Physician Writing | Scientific Communication Solution | Editing & Peer-Reviewing