THE
PROSPECTOR
801 WEST KENSINGTON ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
THE VOICE OF PROSPECT HIGH SCHOOL SINCE 1959
School of rock
superhero Faceoff
@PROSPECTORNOW PROSPECTORNOW.COM VOLUME 55, ISSUE 9
Linguistic life
To read about the success of Prospect’s most recent musical, School of Rock, flip to ...
Columnist Bridgette Jasinski debates Debbie Cunningham to determine the ultimate superhero: Spider-Man or Batman. Page 6
FOLLOW US ON:
Students and staff reflect on the benefits of learning other languages and how it changed their openness and compassion towards others.
Page 12
Page 7
FRIDAY, MAY 6, 2016
Celebrity deaths To learn more about the influential people that passed away this school year, turn to ...
Page13
Weighing in on grade inconsistency Courses taught by multiple teachers BY CAROLINE BINLEY Online Editor-in-Chief
E
very night, junior Jake Murray completes his Accelerated Honors Pre-Calculus homework, ensuring he’ll get the points if his teacher decides to collect it the next day. Murray’s work ethic may be what you would expect, but it’s not what is required — at least not for students who have Pre-Calculus with another teacher. Forty points separate Murray’s class from a second section of the class, where only 10 points of homework have been collected this semester. Murray has watched this gap send students in the point-light class a different message about how much work they have to do. “I feel almost cheated in a way,” Murray said. “I’m over here doing my homework almost every night and getting credit for it, but then [another] class is like, ‘Oh, [my teacher is] never going to collect it.’ They don’t have to do it. They can spend less time on it than I do, and I feel like that’s a situation that isn’t always fair.” A third section of Pre-Calculus is on the spectrum’s other end; the teacher collects homework every day, accounting for 210 points in the gradebook. Junior Deegan O’Malley enjoys the chance this gives him to pad his grade. Tests and quizzes account for 66 percent of his grade and 89 percent of Murray’s, while those same assessments compose 96 percent of the other class. These different setups are symptoms of a larger phenomenon: when a single course is taught by multiple teachers, each teacher has the opportunity to adopt their own grading systems, often leading to inconsistencies that impact the experiences of students in that course. Homework is the wildcard once again in AP Calculus AB, though the point difference is more subtle — 40 to 0.
THE WEIGHT OF A POINT:
As a result of a schedule change, senior Jon Ciske had both Calculus AB teachers this year, and he enjoyed both systems, though for different reasons. When his teacher collected homework, it motivated him to stay on top of his work, and now in a class where homework’s only benefit is practice, Ciske has the chance to motivate himself. Because he did his homework both semesters, the impact on his grade has been minimal, and he doesn’t believe that varying collection rates are a problem. “You’re getting rewarded for something you should already do, so I don’t think it should make much of a difference,” Ciske said. Math and Science Division Head Keith Bellof finds no fault in letting teachers adopt their own grading philosophies, even when the points add up, and Murray concedes
the importance of teacher’s choice. Still, he doesn’t sway from his belief that differences in homework collection create “an unbalanced and an also unfair scenario.” The debate extends from the homework students should do to the quizzes they must take. In AP United States History (APUSH), the amount of quizzes differs with the teacher leading each section: one class took eleven quizzes, another six and the third only two. These quizzes are part of a homework and quiz category, weighted 20 percent, in which each class has a comparable amount of total points. Language and Social Science Division Head Gary Judson accepts differences in testing and quizzing as long as the points are comparable, as they are in this scenario. However, Murray finds the situation un-
balanced, as students who quiz more often have to stress more over those points. O’Malley, whose class has taken six quizzes, enjoys not having the stress of five more, but he recognizes there’s another viewpoint: students who are motivated by quizzes to learn class content may be at a disadvantage in his or the even-less-quizzed class. However, as long as a teacher is consistent in their own quizzing style throughout the year, O’Malley doesn’t see a problem in teachers using their own quizzes with their own difficulty level — an occurrence in Honors World Literature and Communication (HWLC). HWLC teachers share materials, but when it comes to quizzes and small assignments, each teacher picks and chooses what See GRADES, page 3
Crest soars to new levels with historic recognition “They’re not just kids running around and taking pictures. They’re starting to get the recognition they deserve because we’re not just the scrapbookers in room 208, which we had been believed to be.”
BY KRZYS CHWALA Editor-in-Chief Senior Kendall Neumann, editor-in-chief of the yearbook Crest, received a picture message during her trek to gym class of the yearbook staff celebrating in a bus from adviser Nicole Stoltz. The rest of the Crest travelled to the College of DuPage on April 22 for the Northern Illinois Scholastic Press Association (NISPA) conference, where they received a Golden Eagle, the highest award given by the association, for last year’s yearbook and blue ribbons — the highest award available for each individual category they entered. Neumann was immediately thrilled and proud of what her staff had accomplished. This was the first time in the Crest’s history that they received such an award, in addition to awards from national associations, like the Columbia Scholastic Press Association, earlier this year. For Stoltz, this achievement is particularly fulfilling because it provides tangible evidence to both the Crest’s staff and the rest of the school about their work.
Nicole Stoltz, adviser
YEAR OF THE ‘YERD’ :
“Our staff is finally at a point where they feel like they are a program,” Stoltz said. “They’re not just kids running around and taking pictures. They’re starting to get the recognition they deserve because we’re not just the scrapbookers in room 208, which we had
been believed to be.” Stoltz finds herself constantly telling her editors how great of a job they do. With this recognition, she feels it is easier to take a step back and let the editors accept praise from organizations and other students alike, instead of just ac-
cepting praise from her. Neumann appreciates the recognition because it reminds students who forget about the yearbook until its distribution about the ongoing effort necessary to create it. “The yearbook only comes out
once a year, but it’s not like we go dormant,” Neumann said. “Winning these awards makes [the students] remember that we’re here.” These awards, however, were a result of the yearbook program’s development over the past years with Stoltz’s guidance and not just the final product. Neumann recounts her sophomore year as a turning point. Previously, she did not think the program was taken seriously by the editors and instead was merely a See YEARBOOK, page 2