INSIDE
Urban Smith p.7
p.9
p. 5
Bayview Library Reopens p.13
p. 15
Community Calendar p.21
Serving the Potrero Hill, Dogpatch, Mission Bay and SOMA Neighborhoods Since 1970
APRIL 2013
p. 27
FREE
Changes May Be Afoot at the Housing Authority, or Not B y L i z M elchor
See Bayview Library Grand Opening, Southside page 13
Hill Residents Press School District to Prepare for Southside Population Growth By KEITH BURBANK
After almost a year of waiting, Daniel Webster Elementary School parents presented data they’d collected indicating a growing need for high quality elementary and middle schools in the Southside neigbohoods, as well as a proposal for a kindergarten through eighth grade school on Potrero Hill, to City supervisors and school board members last month. But even after the long wait the middle school advocates almost didn’t get a chance to speak. “I was shocked,” said Stacey Bartlett, Potrero Kid’s administrative director. “I guess they wanted to silence us.”
needed and critical in the development of young student’s lives, and then when parents do weigh-in on an issue and it’s unpopular or something the school district is against, it’s unfair to shut them out or to make the process extremely difficult.” District 6 Supervisor Jane Kim, the committee’s chair, didn’t return an email from the View seeking comment. Myong Leigh, San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) deputy superintendent for policy and operations, was one of two district employees who spoke on behalf of SFUSD and International Studies Academy (ISA), which was invited to the hearing. ISA’s high school would have to move or
“We love Daniel Webster because it is a central part of the amazing Potrero Hill community. Our daughter is getting a great education while building lasting relationships with her friends at school. We hope a K-8 school will be approved because we don’t feel comfortable sending our sixth grader to school with 12th graders.” Heidi Williams, who works at Adobe, is a parent to first grader and one year-old
After the meeting, District 10 Supervisor Malia Cohen, who sponsored the item before the Joint City and School District Select Committee, said that it’s important that the school district be transparent in its decision-making process. “I think that’s the one thing I took away from the hearing,” Cohen said. “I think it’s fair to say parent involvement is
close if the district approves an expansion of Webster, now a kindergarten to fifth grade school, onto its campus. ISA’s middle school students would be incorporated in Webster. According to Leigh, the proposal is “very interesting, complicated and layered” Leigh said that, in the fall of 2011 WEBSTER page 4
In late-January, from College Track’s offices on Third and Jerrold streets, Mayor Ed Lee announced in his annual State of the City speech big changes to the Housing Authority. All but one of the existing set of commissioners were out. “What we are doing now with our public housing system isn’t working,” the mayor told the crowd. “If we can’t mend that structure, we should end it. But not without a new vision.” Lee’s announcement came in the midst of controversy surrounding the Housing Authority, an agency that serves more than 20,000 San Franciscans. Last fall, two of the Authority’s own attorneys filed lawsuits against both the Housing Authority and its executive director, Henry Alvarez. One of the attorneys, Tim Larsen, a Caucasian male, alleged that Alvarez, an African-American man, had repeatedly overlooked him for promotions and belittled him for the color of his skin. The lawsuit alleged that Alvarez told Larsen to “stop being so Anglo” and, “if you had more melatonin in your skin, I could make you my deputy.” The other attorney, Roger Crawford, an AfricanAmerican, alleged that Alvarez openly spoke about demoting him because he
took a permissible two-week paternity leave. Accusations of workplace harassment and discrimination were just the beginning for Alvarez. In late-December, the U.S. Department of Housing and Development (HUD), the federal agency in charge of public housing, designated the Housing Authority “troubled” because of its failing score of 54 out of 100 on the Public Housing Assessment System, a tool HUD uses to measure the performance of housing authorities throughout the country. In late-January, the San Francisco Chronicle published an article that alleged Alvarez had illegally steered two contracts towards consultants with long histories in Bayview: Linda Richardson, Treasure Island Development Authority Board president, and Dwayne Jones, a former Housing Authority Commissioner. The Larsen lawsuit had alleged that Alvarez repeatedly circumvented the sealed bidding process the Housing Authority has in place to prevent favoritism by asking his preferred contractors to re-bid at just the right price. In February, Alvarez went on mediHOUSING Southside page 14
Central Subway Audit Uncovers Illegitimate Expenditures B y L i z M elchor
Come 2018, transit riders should be able to get on the Muni T-line at Fourth and Brannan streets and take a train all the way to Chinatown, via the San Francisco Municipal Transportation’s Agency’s (SFMTA) Central Subway. The controversial subway extension is expected to cost more than $1.6 billion, a large portion of which will be spent on consultants. And it seems that when municipal transportation expenditures get so large, private contractors try to work the system to their benefit. A recent audit by Sacramento-based fir m Sjoberg Evashenk found that 10 of 14 consulting firms working on the Central Subway were overcharging the City, to the tune of $900,000. The most egregious companies tried to pass along expenses like a wedding cake, personal vacations, and tables at charity golf tournaments. The Central Subway project has
been criticized for its high cost since its inception. A 2011 Civil Grand Jury report, Central Subway: Too Much Money for Too Little Benefit, compared the Central Subway to another famous 1.7 mile transportation construction feat in San Francisco: the Golden Gate Bridge. To replace the bridge would cost $1.2 billion, they asserted. How could the Central Subway cost so much more? Howard Wong, a member of SaveMu ni, which has long advocated against the project, said that the Central Subway’s budget doesn’t make sense. According to Wong, on typical large infrastructure projects the percentage of funds dedicated to “soft costs” — expenses unrelated to construction, such as consultants — tends to be between five and 12 percent. But for the Central Subway soft expenses are estimated at more than $350 milCENTRAL SUBWAY page 5