INSIDE
Op-Ed: Fight On! Pg. 2
DECEMBER 2016
Annex-Terrace Changes Pg.4
‘aina Wins Bib Gourmand Pg. 6
Arch Returns Pg.6
Police Work With Hill Residents to Combat Crime Pg. 9
Serving the Potrero Hill, Dogpatch, Mission Bay and SOMA Neighborhoods Since 1970
SF in the Rearview Mirror Pg.21
FREE
Driscoll’s Boycott Hampered by Poor Information BY MICHAEL IACUESSA
Since calls for a boycott of berry distributor Driscoll’s began in 2013, San Francisco grocers have struggled to find more information about the issues driving the labor dispute. The boycott effort has mostly been grassroots, led by Mexican farmworkers, many of whom are isolated and speak indigenous languages, making it difficult to communicate with reliable news sources. Last fall, the issue got more confusing when word spread that the boycott was being called off. The labor battle against the company has been fought on two fronts. In 2013, workers in Northwest Washington organized several walkouts over unpaid wages at Sakuma Brothers Farms. Then, in 2015, workers in Mexico’s San Quintin Valley, in Baja, California, launched a series of strikes over living and working conditions at BerryMex. Driscoll’s is the principal distributor for both farms. The operations primarily employ migrant farm workers, many from Mexico’s Oaxaca region. The two groups of farmworkers committed to assist each other in elevating the boycott into an international affair. However, in September Sakuma agreed to allow its workers to unionize; 77 of roughly 370 farmworkers voted to join Familia Unidas por la Justicia (FUJ). That led FUJ to call-off the boycott while they negotiate a contract with Sakuma. Labor leaders hailed the unionization as a major victory. The union is only the third independent farmworker union formed in Washington in the last three decades, and the first led by indigenous workers. In 2014, in what was the largest wage settlement ever in Washington, Sakuma agreed to pay $850,000 for unpaid hours. The next year, berry pickers took their case to the state supreme court, where they won the right to paid rest breaks. Maru Mora Villalpando, a FUJ spokesperson and longtime activist DRISCOLL continues on page 11
Rebuild Potrero to Break Ground in 2017 BY MICHAEL IACUESSA
Next month, Bridge Housing will break ground on an ambitious effort, titled “Rebuild Potrero,” to redevelop the Potrero Annex-Terrace housing complex into mixed income housing. Rebuild Potrero, which has already spent eight years in planning, will evolve over five phases, enabling current Annex-Terrace residents to be moved to new buildings as they’re constructed. Upon completion, anticipated by 2026, the site will feature the same number, 619, of public housing units that exist today, as well as 200 affordable and 800 market rate units. Those making half or less of San Francisco’s median income – for one person, $37,700; a three-person household, $48,500 – would be eligible for
affordable housing. There’ll also be 15,000 square feet of retail in a neighborhood that currently has two small s t or e s , a s w e l l a s a 2 5,0 0 0 t o 35,000-square foot community center. Bridge, a nonprofit that specializes in affordable housing, which manages more than 10,000 apartments on the West Coast, has been working with Annex-Terrace residents for the past few years to address issues of poverty, crime, and potential dislocation. “We felt it wasn’t enough for us to just have a master plan for the physical site. We thought it was just as important to also have a social services master plan,” explained Thu Banh, Bridge’s community developer assigned to the site. “Obviously, it is going to take more than just having a new unit to live in. They are going to need support in
employment, education and health.” In 2014, Bridge surveyed AnnexTerrace residents to identify ways it could improve the community. Leveraging other efforts, the developer created a series of programs designed to enhance health and well-being, including a garden, daily walks, healthy living workshops and exercise classes. “It is not just about building new units,” said Banh. “We have to ensure that residents are not only ready once their new unit is built, but that they are able to stay in the unit.” The track record in similar redevelopments hasn’t been good. In the 1990s, the federal government created the Hope VI program, with a goal of turning isolated public housing projREBUILD continues on page 10
Neighborly Assistance: The American Settlement Movement in San Francisco B Y B R E T T Y AT E S
It’s safe to assume that most San Franciscans—including those yoga classe participants at the Potrero Hill Neighborhood House on De Haro Street, and those who drop their children off for preschool at the Good Samaritan Family Resource Center on Potrero Avenue—have never heard the term “settlement house.” “Community center,” the more popular phrase of current times, may, for all its broadness, better describe the contemporary function of these establishments. But the term elides a complex history of Progressive Era
social outreach that forged many of the fundamental tenets that continue to inform the practices of San Francisco institutions like Chinatown’s Cameron House and the Western Addition’s Booker T. Washington Community Service Center. In 1884, Anglican cleric Samuel Barnett and educator Henrietta Barnett conceptualized the “settlement house” as a new form of charity when they established Toynbee Hall in London’s East End. Their revolutionary plan was to create, in one of the city’s worst slums, a residence for educated, upper-class volunteers, who, by “settling” among the underprivi-
leged, would learn about the plight of the downtrodden while dispensing healthcare, education, and culture to their new neighbors. Their model caught on in the United States. San Francisco’s first settlement house, the Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Center, was founded in 1890 by two young Sunday school teachers. It continues to operate today. Settlement houses functioned not only as volunteer dormitories but as recreation centers, meeting halls, and social service agencies. Foremost, they sought to bring the SETTLEMENT continues on page 16