Energy consulting project Sample

Page 1

Elementary and Middle School improvements

Baseline model setup

File type: Final Results Report Location: Prairie City, IA Role: Energy consultant and modeler Project Introduction This Report is designed to assist the Owner and Project Team in making energy-related decisions about building design. The process is analytical in nature, using tools and methods not normally part of the customary design contract. The Owner, Project Team, and Energy consultant work together to understand how the building will use energy and where cost-effective savings can be realized, through design. This project is located in Iowa, climate zone 5. The scope of the project includes renovation and partial addition. Also, there are several spaces with renovation potential. The design team likes to evaluate saving potential before making decisions. Due to the character of complicated space, several different mechanical systems are applied in the project. The analysis is compared to ASHRAE 90.1 2010. The system type is compared to the Appendix G. This information is based on a review of the design documents and conversations with the Project Team. The work flow includes following process.

The Weidt Group analyzes energy solutions using DOE-2.2, a building simulation program. The program performs thermal and luminous calculations on an hour-by-hour basis, using typical yearly climatic data, to determine the building's energy loads and system requirements. The Weidt Group gathers building description data and assumptions from the Owner and Project Team to construct the model. Some of the customized operating assumptions include the following. The energy models are simulated using the Des Moines, IA DOE-2.2 Typical Meteorological Year (TMY) weather file. This energy model is intended for comparison of relative differences in net energy use for various design alternatives, compared to a baseline condition; it is not intended for system design and/or equipment selection. In addition, the actual energy use of this building will be different from the DOE-2.2 simulations because there will be differences in the weather, operating parameters, occupancy, and other circumstances not anticipated in the model. Given those qualifications, however, this model offers energy savings estimations as good as any other means available for a building that has not yet been built. The Baseline model provides a benchmark for comparison of alternatives. The sole purpose of the Baseline is to establish a starting point for program administration. The Baseline uses building characteristics provided by the Project Team, default operating characteristics representative of this building type, and minimum performance criteria for building components or systems based upon the prevailing energy code. A Protocol has been established for Baseline criteria. ASHRAE baseline setup Appen G sys. 3 ---- PSZ-AC --- Packaged rooftop air conditioner --- Constant volume --- Direct expansion --- Fossil fuel furnace Appen G sys. 4 ---- PSZ-HP --- Packaged rooftop heat pump--- Constant volume --- Direct expansion --- Electric fuel furnace

1. Intro meeting (understanding basic building information)

New LED lighting Heat pump&DX cooling vs. Appen G sys. 4

3. Final results meeting (Finalize strategies selection and review bundle results)

New LED lighting Gas furnace&DX cooling vs. Appen G sys. 3

4. Site Verification (Construction Documents review and on-site verification)

New Addition Renovation Alternate Renovation

Building Summary Location Building Area

Prairie City, IA 54,836 sf – 27736 sf renovation, 13,300 sf alternate renovation, 13,800 sf addition Summary of Existing condition

Envelope

Exis�ng: Brick exterior finishes with CMU backup and ba� insula�on exis�ng:Punched windows with aluminum framing Florescent light throughout

Summary of Renovation

Plug Loads

Addi�on: Steel studs with metal frame wall; Exis�ng: To be remain Addi�on: storefront and curtain wall Exis�ng: To be remain Mix of exis�ng florescent llight and new LED light Typical plug loads by space type

Service Water Heating

Electric point of use water heater

Lighting

Hours of Operation Mechanical

No lighting upgrade electric heating&DX cooling vs. Appen G sys. 4 No lighting upgrade Gas furnace&DX cooling vs. Appen G sys. 3 New LED lighting Gas furnace&DX cooling vs. Appen G sys. 3

No lighting upgrade LED lighting Gas furnace&DX cooling vs. Appen G sys. 3

Energy conservation measure evaluation

Systems Summary

Glazing

Alternate LED lighting upgrade No HVAC upgrade

Alternate LED lighting upgrade No HVAC upgrade

2. Preliminary results meeting (select energy conservation measures to evaluate in model)

Typical opera�on hours for elementary school Classroom A: Exis�ng electric coil for hea�ng and DX cooling; Auditorium, Classrooms B, Media Center, Gymnasium: exis�ng Packaged variable air volume with gas furnace and DX cooling; Classrooms C: Exis�ng Packaged heat pumps with gas backup Office (New), Classroom (New): Non

Classroom A: New electric coil for hea�ng and DX cooling; Auditorium, Classrooms B, Media Center, Gymnasium: New Packaged variable air volume with gas furnace and DX cooling; Classrooms C: New Packaged heat pumps with gas backup Office (New), Classroom (New): Heat pump furnace and energy recovery

This table shows Whole Building results for Top 10 individual strategies or groups of strategies to show the best opportunities. Dollar savings affect payback, and savings accrue every year of a building’s life. Hourly Whole Building analysis allows us to present integrated results. Individual conservation and efficiency strategies can affect more than one fuel source. For example, a more efficient lighting design produces less heat. This reduction in interior heat gain reduces cooling energy needs. If cooling energy is produced by electricity, those savings are integrated into the Annual Dollar Savings above. However, that more efficient lighting may cause a need for more heating energy in the winter.

Strategy Descrip�on

How does this strategy save energy?

Ligh�ng wa�age is saved by reducing light level or increasing ligh�ng system efficiency Ligh�ng wa�age is saved by switches that allow Ligh�ng switch strategies occupants to choose lower light levels (eg. 1/3 or 2/3) Hea�ng and cooling energy are reduced by closing VAV Occupancy sensor control of outside boxes lowering ven�la�on rates when zones are air - RTU 3,4&new addi�on unoccupied Cooling energy is reduced by an increased system Best cooling systems efficiency Hea�ng and cooling load is reduced by improved window Best Fenestra�on characteris�cs Hea�ng energy is reduced by an increased system Best hea�ng systems efficiency Ligh�ng energy is saved by turning lights off when Occupancy sensor control of ligh�ng applicable spaces are empty Total heat recovery- RTU 1,2,5& new Hea�ng and cooling energy are reduced by recovering addi�on heat from building exhaust air Ligh�ng energy is saved by dimming lights automa�cally Dimming dayligh�ng in response to daylight Hea�ng and cooling load is reduced by increasing Max envelope insula�on levels and window characteris�cs Lowest wa�age ligh�ng design

Annual Energy Savings

Included

$2,446 $2,261

1

$2,053

1

$1,322 $1,234 $1,202 $1,200

1

$1,122

1

$982 $975

• Lowest wattage lighting design strategies results in the highest energy savings. • Control to outside air and other ventilation control strategies show significant heating and fan energy savings when ventilation air and conditioning are reduced with controls. • Lighting design and control strategies also contribute to good energy savings and incentives.

1 front

1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Energy consulting project Sample by Tianyu Feng - Issuu