NEW NATION, APRIL 2024

Government sabotaging work of the Public Accounts Committee

The Public Accounts Committee stands as a bastion of transparency and accountability and provides responsible oversight over public funds allocated. Without effective oversight, we risk witnessing fiscal mismanagement, reckless squandering of public resources, and a crisis of trust in the government‟s financial stewardship. last week's cancellation of yet another statutory Monday meeting of the Public Accounts Committee is becoming more and more representative of the government‟s clear plot to stymie the work of this very important committee of the National Assembly.

Primarily, the government members who sit on this committee are deliberately absenting themselves, especially the government ministers who should not have been there in the first place, according to Minister Gail Teixeira‟s own words in parliament, where she posited “ministers of government should not sit on the PAC because of their commitments and heavy workload”. I agreed with her then and I agree with her even more now. The government members, we all have seen, continue to display a flagrant disregard for this crucial parliamentary oversight body, entrusted with the vital task of scrutinizing government‟s financial matters.

The government‟s consistent no-show is imperiling one of the guard rails of our democracy, it is handicapping the committee‟s capacity to function as a robust oversight mechanism to aid the overarching principles of good governance. This disheartening trend began when the PPP/C government altered the Standing Orders, mandating the presence of two government members for a quorum. This change, we argued then, was intended to slow down and stymie the committee‟s work which the PPP/C denied was their true intention. But one year and months later, it is clear as day, with the more than 40 cancellations of the committee‟s meetings since this unnecessary and unwarranted change was made, the PAC continues to grapple with an alarming backlog of work, particularly in its present examination of the financial records for the year 2019, rendering it five years behind schedule.

It is important to note that a fully functioning PAC is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy, providing a vital counterbalance to government actions and to ensure that accounting officers discharge their duties and responsibilities in accordance with the law and show respect in service to the people they serve. It is in this regard, I again, on behalf of the committee, emphatically call upon the government to prioritize the prompt resumption of regular PAC meetings, replace the “hard working” ministers of government with two other competent members, so that the committee can really begin to address its backlog of work in a meaningful way, diligently executing the pivotal oversight duties for the people of Guyana we all love. Ω

ANALYSIS & OPINIONS

City council does not need a bailout, it needs the monies owed by the government

By Alfred Mentore, JP Mayor of the City of Georgetown

I have noticed that over the last few days, after the collapse of a section of the Stabroek Market Wharf, the Guyana Chronicle has dedicated a significant percentage of column inches in that newspaper, to criticize the management of the Georgetown City Council, Collapse of section of ‘Stabroek roof’ end result of years of neglect by APNU-led City Council, 17th April, 2024. Mentore should go thy way in peace, 19th April 2024, Editorial: Poor City Governance, 19th April 2024. However, I shall comment on the Editorial; I will address the other article in a subsequent letter. I hope that in the spirit of fairness and good media ethics, the management of the Guyana Chronicle would publish my responses to the articles by certain city councillors, and its Editorial.

As Mayor, I welcome criticisms. For me, the utility of criticisms is in their potential to assist us, at the council, to improve our responsiveness to the felt needs of our citizens. Nevertheless, I do wish to make a few points about the frame and substance of the editorial.

First, it must be noted that, the role of the media as a watchdog of society is paramount in holding both public and private institutions accountable for their actions. However, when media outlets engage in selective criticism, prioritizing certain issues over others clearly based on political bias or agenda, it undermines their credibility and integrity as purveyors of truth. It is clear that, the Guyana Chronicle‟s editorial board‟s approach to criticizing the City Council while ignoring government failures in the wake of recent national negative events and incidents epitomizes this detrimental practice. Here, I am not trying to make excuses but to point out an important truth which is that the editorial appears to be more concerned with negotiating the unfortunate event to highlight the perceived shortcomings of the council and to link those inadequacies to a particular political party. That alone disqualifies this editorial as a serious attempt to keep citizens properly informed about this situation and to report fairly and accurately on the facts.

I understand that the recent collapse of the Stabroek Market Wharf would, undoubtedly, warrant scrutiny, as it reflects upon the management of the city by the municipal authorities. But, the glaring inconsistency arises when the same editorial board fails to adequately report, let alone criticize, the government‟s handling of tragic events with massive national significance such as the tragic inferno at Mahdia that claimed the lives of 22 of our youths, the destruction of more than six public school buildings, by fire, the razing of the Brickdam Police Station by fire, the fatal helicopter crash that claimed important lives and the spike in the spate of blackouts experienced by citizens and students preparing for various exams. This selective approach to journalism not only skews public perception but also perpetuates a narrative that prioritizes political agendas over objective reporting. I should point out that the impact of such biased reporting on the credibility of the newspaper cannot be overstated. Journalism is founded on principles of truth, objectivity and impartiality. When the Chronicle chooses to ignore or downplay certain events while amplifying others based on political leanings, it erodes public trust in the integrity of its journalistic practice. Readers rightfully expect balanced and comprehensive coverage that holds all institutions accountable, regardless of political affiliation.

Second, the editorial itself is riddled with inaccuracies. For example, the editorial stated that: “… the PNC/APNU-controlled City Council…”. That narrative is patently false and is part of a political conspiracy to link the opposition to the Municipality as a collective.

The truth is that the City Council is the government for the Georgetown District. It is an autonomous statutory body, with full powers to manage the affairs of its local government area- the city. Its decisions are legally binding. Further, the Municipal and District Councils Act, Chapter 28:01 guides the actions of the council. It has conferred certain powers on the City Council. The council is not controlled by any political party; it is managed by an elected council (30 councillors with equal rights, powers, responsibilities and privileges) and an administration composed of statutory and local government officers, whose duties, functions, powers and reporting responsibilities, are clearly set out in Chapter 28:01. No political party or other organization or group can control the council.

Third, at para 2 of the editorial, the assembly of the words: “that area did not deteriorate and became an eyesore overnight” is stating the obvious. Since 2015, the council inspected and observed that that structure was in need of urgent repairs. In 2017, under Town Clerk Royston King, the council did a conditional analysis and determined that the wharf was in a ruinous and calamitous state, and that it should be demolished. As a result, council agreed that, that section of the market should be condemned and cordoned off, and vendors should not be allowed to enter or do business on the wharf. That was done. The council provided space for those affected vendors, at Russel Square, on the western side of the Parliament Building. The plan was to design and install special collapsible/ removable stalls for those vendors. However, the council could not muster the requisite resources to move forward in a manner befitting the authorities of the nation‟s capital.

Also, the council considered a proposal to redesign and repurpose the space that accommodates the wharf, to facilitate a modern mall with appropriate amenities. That too could not happen because of a lack of funds. Then there was the proposal by the Ministry of Public Infrastructure to construct a modern mall and boardwalk utilizing a portion of a grant from the European Union. There was at least one presentation on this project by representatives of the Ministries of Finance, Public Infrastructure, and I think, Natural Resources. That too encountered certain challenges; it did not materialize. I mentioned those activities, and projects to demonstrate that over the years, the council did not sit on its hands and watch that and other structures deteriorate as this editorial seems to want to suggest. In fact, at that time and now, the council was engaged in restoring and repairing several other municipal assets including Kitty Market, the Engineer‟s Building, the Constabulary Head office, the Training School, the Stone Depot, and the Solid Waste Management Building. But, the shallowness of the city treasury made it impossible for us to attend to all the problems, in every section, at the same time. Yes, we were aware of the challenges, including the deterioration of the Wharf, but we did our best in all the circumstances. Again, the council is painfully aware of its shortcomings to do critical repairs to other assets such as our municipal markets, and other buildings. However plans are afoot with our partners to develop Stabroek market, the vendors mall and Bourda green based on feasibility studies commissioned. This is so, because we have shown the leadership capacity to conceptualize projects; however the council does not have the resources to fulfill this aspect of its responsibility. Therefore, I disagree with the President, as quoted in the editorial when he said that: “…because, from a leadership perspective, there is no capacity to manage some of these key infrastructure and investment in the city.” We simply do not have the money and when we try to implement new revenue earning measures and projects or to monetize them, we are prevented or blocked from doing so by the very government … (Continued on Page 9)

Venezuela’s aggression is of deep concern

The Parliamentary Opposition views with deep concern, and alarm, the action taken by the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to promulgate “the organic law for the defense of Guayana Essequiba” in total violation of international law.

The Parliamentary Opposition is constrained to note that this illegal act has come at a time when the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela continues to take belligerent action against the Cooperative Republic of Guyana, including, the fraudulent referendum of December 3, 2023; the build-up of troops along the border and other provocative acts. These measures will neither contribute to the peaceful relations between the two countries nor the overall peace of the region. A zone of peace can hardly survive in these circumstances. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela will therefore be responsible for the further decline in the relations between the two states and any breach in the peaceful development of the region.

Accordingly, the Parliamentary Opposition not only rejects this organic law but condemns it as a flagrant violation of International Law, the Gene-

va Agreement and the letter and spirit of the recent joint Declaration of Argyle for dialogue and peace agreed to on December 14, 2023. Also, the “Organic Law” is in clear violation of the recent decision of the ICJ which enjoined that “Pending a final decision in the case, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela shall refrain from taking any action which would modify the situation which currently prevails in the territory of dispute…”.

The Parliamentary Opposition further notes that the government and people of Guyana have not engaged in any aggressive action against the government and people of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, but rather has sought to solve the territorial controversy through peaceful and legal means, including the resort to the International Court of Justice which is now considering a final decision in this matter.

The Parliamentary Opposition finally urges the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela to act responsibly and not further inflame the geo-political fault lines of the region, and thereby threaten its further peaceful development.

VP Jagdeo should stop playing juvenile games with the gas-to-energy contracts

The Guyanese people should note that Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo, when asked at a previous Press Conference by a KNews reporter when would the Gas-to-Energy contracts be released to the National Assembly, declared bluntly: "I don't know." He then offered several lame excuses why he still refuses to release these documents despite long-standing demands from the media and the Opposition. We and others have repeatedly commented on this unacceptable situation as PPP's disregard for transparency and accountability and its disrespect for the people of Guyana. But, in addition, VP Jagdeo displays two particularly irksome attitudes as he continues to hide and hoard information. One, his attitude is to take credit for the release of sporadic bits of information when, in fact, it is the relentless pressure from the media and the Opposition that forced him to do so. He, for example, praised himself for the release last week of the two audit reports

on the operations of Exxon Guyana when the media and the Opposition have been demanding these since last year.

In his second attitude, VP Jagdeo, in keeping the documents as secrets, takes pleasure in criticizing others for not being properly informed about the matters covered in the very documents. This is a typical ploy of persons who like to pretend to be the brightest person in the room. They deliberately withhold information from others so that they can ridicule and belittle them.

It is time that Mr. Jagdeo stops this juvenile behavior. Our oil industry is too pivotal to Guyana's present and future prosperity for one man to be playing games with vital information that should be available to all Guyanese, including the media, civil society, and the parliamentary Opposition. We call on the VP to grow up and release all contracts on the Gas-toEnergy project and all other projects.

PPP incompetence will prolong the Blackout Plague

Many Guyanese were hoping that the addition of more generators would have brought the blackout plague to an end by now. Even though 14 of the 17 used generators bought last year are reportedly on the grid, it is clear they are inefficient and under-performing. Load shedding has continued, even though the government and Power Company are reluctant to admit this fact. This is of course one of the risks with purchasing used generators that others have discarded. Guyanese must continue to hold Bharrat Jagdeo and the PPP government accountable for this fiasco.

We have called for the government to purchase new generators, with an additional 50MW capacity beyond estimated demand. If demand continues to rise, as we expect it will, more generators will have to be purchased to maintain this buffer. Barely having enough generation capacity to meet current demand exposes the government‟s lack of planning and common sense. A buffer will allow our electricity generation system to absorb the failure of any of the aged engines GPL itself describes as “unreliable,” eliminating one of the critical risks to our energy security.

The government appears to have grudgingly capitulated to this sound advice. Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo indicated last week that as much as

80MW is likely to be purchased. It is unfortunate that this was not done when we first made this recommendation last November, as it would have prevented the current blackout plague. Guyanese must note the amount of effort it took to convince the selfclaimed Mr. Know-it-all, VP Jagdeo, of the simple concept of redundancy, which even the most humble business owner knows.

To ensure energy security and the elimination of blackouts over the long term, let us stress that any new generation acquired must be dual fuel in nature, so that it can benefit from the natural gas that is being brought onshore. We in the Opposition see the acquisition of more capacity not of nuisance value and a stop-gap measure (as the PPP sees it), but as a necessary investment into our country‟s energy infrastructure going into the future. Even when the 300 MW gas-fired power plant comes online, the country will still have to rely on its stock of smaller generators to ensure that electricity can be supplied to the nation free of disruptions and interruptions whether due to maintenance, increased demand, or mechanical or other sudden failures. This is called proper planning in contrast to the PPP‟s thoughtless, ad hoc and knee jerk approaches. Luckily, their time in office is nearing an end.

POLITICAL

Update on the work of the Parliamentary Sectoral Committee on Economic Services

The Parliamentary Opposition continues to utilize every means to force the government to account to the Guyanese people for its governance and management of the country.

On the 10th April 2024, the Opposition-led Economic Services Committee held a meeting where the Minister and Senior Members of the Ministry of Public Works were summoned to appear. During the course of the meeting, opposition members expressed their dissatisfaction with two major issues:

1. The Unconscionable Fare Increase in Public Transportation.

2. The Blackout crisis.

On the issue of the unconscionable increase in fare for public transportation, the committee agreed and advised the Minister of Public Works to immediately meet with various associations including the Speed Boat Association at Parika, Bartica and Supenaam to bring this untenable situation to an end so as to ease the burden on the public.

With respect to the blackout crisis, the committee acknowledged that it is a definite matter of urgent public importance and as such there was a unanimous agreement to have those in government with the responsibility of policy and administration of GPL appear before the committee so that the issue can be properly interrogated with the view of arriving at solutions to bring this crisis to an end.

Opposition members also pressed the Minister of Public Works for answers on several other matters including:

1. Stalled Major Construction Projects.

2. Continuous Expenditure Cheddi Jagan International Airport Expansion Project.

3. Expenditure on River Transportation.

4. Status of Major Infrastructure Projects, and

5. Contract Monitoring Units.

Like the Public Accounts Committee, the Economic Services Committee is currently chaired by the opposition and is the only active sectoral commit-

On Wednesday 17th

tee in Parliament holding fourteen meetings over the last year. Nevertheless, the work and function of the committee continue to be stymied by the government and the speaker of the National Assembly. The committee had set out a clear work program which entails field visits to certain economic projects including the recently recommissioned Rose Hall and Skeldon Sugar Estates, the Blackbelly Sheep and Brackish Freshwater Shrimp Projects. This work program was first rejected by government members of the committee and has since been denied approval for funding by the Speaker of the National Assembly over the last six months or more.

The committee upon the request of opposition members has also agreed that the Oil and Gas Sector as a new industry with the most significant impact on our economy must be added to the area of scrutiny of this committee. This request has also been essentially blocked by the government and serves to highlight the Peoples Progressive Party‟s utter disregard for transparency and accountability in the oil and gas sector and, more generally, its attempts to sideline and undermine the Parliament of Guyana. Ω

The Opposition welcomes the decision of the High Court on the legality of the

The Opposition considers as a significant reaffirmation of workers‟ rights the ruling on Friday (19th April) by High Court Judge Sandil Kissoon that the Guyana Teachers Union (GTU) led strike was legal. We further see the ruling as a blow against the PPP government in its efforts to abuse the rights and freedoms of workers and other Guyanese and to control public institutions.

The High Court, correctly in our view, reversed the vengeful anti-union actions of the government to deduct the salaries of teachers who participated in the month-long strike in February, and to discontinue deducting union dues from the salaries of teachers for the union. We share in the Court‟s condemnation of the government‟s actions as “arbitrary, unilateral, and discriminatory”.

Guyanese should also take note that the Judge found it necessary to expose the unprofessional and deceptive conduct of senior public servants in the Ministries of Education and Labour, particularly the Chief Education Officer. While we, in the Opposition, understand the political pressures under

GTU strike

which senior public servants work, we call on them to uphold their integrity and resist becoming pawns and lackeys of the PPP government.

We note that the government has announced its intention to appeal the High Court‟s ruling “to the CCJ, if necessary.” Teachers and workers must view this as a further demonstration of a government that is obsessed with authoritarian power. Guyanese, as one, must continue to stand up and resist.

The PPP government is not the government we deserve. We deserve a government that respects the rights and freedoms of workers and all other citizens and that embraces the principles of good governance. We deserve a government that sees workers‟ rights as human rights.

The Opposition Coalition will continue to stand on the side of the GTU and the teachers of Guyana as they continue their fight for the respect, remuneration, and other rewards they duly deserve. We are confident that justice will prevail, and the union and its capable legal team will ultimately succeed. Ω

Message from the Leader of the PNCR and Parliamentary Opposition to all Grade Six pupils embarking on the National Grade Six Assessment (NGSA)

As you step into these pivotal days, (Thursday 2nd and Friday 3rd May 2024), remember that you carry within you the strength, knowledge, and determination to conquer any challenge that comes your way. This assessment marks not just an academic milestone but a testament to your resilience and dedication.

To parents, guardians, and mentors, your unwavering support is the cornerstone of your child's success. Your encouragement, guidance, and love serve as the guiding light that illuminates their path towards greatness.

As the Parliamentary Opposition, we stand in solidarity with every Grade Six pupil, urging you to embrace these moments with confidence and tenacity. Your potential knows no bounds, and with perseverance, you will soar to

Visit to La Parfaite Harmonie

The pile driving exercise in Region #3, La Parfaite Harmony have caused massive destruction to many homes and disturbed the lives of many residents in the area. The project involves the construction of poles for the running of heavyduty electrical wires (69KVA line) from Wales to the Vreed-en-Voop Power Station. The contractor has committed to fixing the damages, and residents were pleased to hear so. An assessment will be done shortly, and we endeavor to follow up to ensure the issue is resolved.

new heights. May you approach each question with clarity of mind, draw upon your learnings with conviction, and showcase the brilliance that lies within. Remember, success is not solely defined by a score but by the growth, resilience, and character forged along the way.

Believe in yourselves, trust in your abilities, and know that regardless of the outcome, you are destined for greatness. The journey ahead may be challenging, but with perseverance, determination, and the unwavering support of your loved ones, you will emerge victorious.

Wishing you all the best as you embark on this transformative journey. You have the power to shape your destiny, and we have every confidence that you will rise to the occasion. Ω

Mr. Shurwayne Holder, MP Chairman of the Parliamentary Committee on Economics Services

April, the Leader of the PNCR and Leader of the Opposition, Mr. Aubrey C. Norton, MP along with Regional Member of Parliament, Mr. Ganesh Mahipaul, MP and a team visited the area and interacted with residents, along with the contractor of the project.

FOREIGN RELATIONS

On Monday 8th April 2024, the Leader of the Opposition, Mr. Aubrey C. Norton, MP and Team met with the ABCE Ambassadors and High Commissioners at his Congress Place, Sophia office. Accompanying him at the meeting were Party Chairman, Mr. Shurwayne Holder, MP; CEC members, Mr. Mervyn Williams and Mr. Ganesh Mahipaul, MP; Shadow Minister of Education, Ms. Coretta McDonald, MP and Economist, Mr. Elson Low.

OUTREACH - REGION #6

Visit to Yakusari, Black Bush Polder by the Leader of the Opposition and Team

On Friday, 5th April 2024, Leader of the PNCR and the Opposition Aubrey C. Norton, MP, and a team visited farmers and residents of Yakusari, Black Bush Polder. The Leader was accompanied by Sherwin Benjamin, Central Executive Member; Mervyn Williams, Central Executive Member; Purendra Singh, Egarton David, Shaneika Haynes, Public Relations Officer and staff. (See photos below).

On April 5, 2024, the Leader of the People‟s National Congress Reform (PNCR) and the Leader of the Opposition in Guyana, Mr. Aubrey C. Norton MP, and a team from the PNCR visited Yakasari, Black Bush Polder. During their visit, they observed several concerning issues that have been affecting the local community. Key concerns raised included:

1. Discriminatory Practices in CashGrantDistribution

The PPP/C operatives were accused of discriminatory practices in handling cash grant distribution for flood relief and farmers‟ relief. Accordingly, persons who lost crops and livestock submitted their names several times and did not receive any relief because they were perceived to be outspoken about corruption and supporters of the APNU.

2. Lack of Clear Agricultural DevelopmentalPlan

Concerns were raised about the absence of a coherent agricultural developmental plan in the region. The government allocated rice land and cash crops land next to each other this creates problems when the rice farmers are spraying weedicides to protect

their rice crops the cash crops are affected. In addition to the problems with the layout of the farmlands, the agricultural officers are of no use they are unable to make any informed intervention to protect the farmers.

3. Corruption in Distributing StateResources

Allegations were made regarding corruption in distributing state resources among residents. The residents claim that known PPP/C operatives are removing the names of persons who are supposed to legitimately benefit from grants and replacing them with their friends, and family names.

4. Victimization of Opposition Supporters

Residents perceived to support the opposition reported victimization by PPP/C operatives. One resident indicated that her name was submitted on several occasions for the grants because she lost crops and livestock but did not receive any because she and her family were open supporters of the APNU. Others claimed they suffered similar fate.

5. Mismanagement at the Black

The mismanagement at the Black Bush Polder Neighbourhood Democratic Council (NDC) was highlighted during the briefing; drainage cleaning is done by spraying thus creating further hardship for residents and only PPPC supporters are getting contracts. The residents said the council is being given direction from the minister on what to do and who should not benefit from the programmes of the NDC. They point to incidents of mismanagement and called for an audit of the NDC.

6. Discrimination in DevelopmentalProjects

Discriminatory practices were noted in carrying out developmental and infrastructural projects, these works are done in perceived areas that supported the PPP/C.

7. Indiscriminate Use of 2D4 Weedicide

Concerns were raised about the indiscriminate use of 2D4 weedicide by rice farmers in the region; this is causing the crops planted by these farmers to die.

8. Selective Water Release for

RiceFarmers

It was pointed out that water release was biased towards rice farmers over cash crop farmers, thus causing the crops planted to die.

9. Mismanagement of Water ResourcesattheConservancy

Issues related to mismanagement of water resources at the conservancy were also discussed.

The Leader of the Opposition expressed gratitude to the residents for inviting him and listening to their concerns. He outlined his peoplecentered development plan and assured them that he would raise their grievances at various levels. The residents openly supported the Leader and expressed their willingness to collaborate with him. They promised to organise a larger meeting involving community members to further engage with him.

The visit by the Leader of the Opposition to Black Bush Polder shed light on various challenges faced by residents due to discriminatory practices and mismanagement by PPP/C operatives The Leader‟s commitment to addressing these issues and engaging with the community was wellreceived by residents who showed strong support for his initiatives. Ω

BushPolderNDC

OUTREACH - REGION #1

Region #1 residents dissatisfied with the performance of the government in their communities

A recent visit to Region #1 Barima/ Waini revealed that with all the talk about investing large sums of money in the Region, the people in the Region are not seeing value for money. They complained that across the Region the People‟s Progressive Party is only focusing on their friends, their families and their favourites and neglecting critical work that needs to be done in the Region.

Accompanying the Leader of the PNCR and Leader of the Opposition, Mr. Aubrey C. Norton, MP on visits to the various communities in the Region were Mr. Ronald Cox, MP; CEC Member Mr. Mervyn Williams, Joan Romascindo, Alana Tang, Malcolm Peters, Donna Prefero, and other local Party activists.

At Baramita, people complained that there is no facility for the police who deal with immigration to do their work. They bemoan the fact that people checking in and out of the village have to use a storage facility with

little or no furniture to book in and out. Residents are requesting that the government build a proper structure for the police immigration section to do their job.

Citizens also complained that the school is overcrowded and demanded that a school be built to facilitate the children so that they can learn in a comfortable environment. It was also noted that the school has more than 500 children with only thirteen teachers. More importantly, the secondary school has over 140 children with three teachers. In addition, they pointed out the need for living quarters for teachers.

In this modern era in oil rich Guyana there is little or no access to the internet using WiFi. This affects both teachers and students and should be addressed by the government because internet access is necessary in these far flung communities.

Many senior citizens in the area are demanding that the government put

arrangements in place so that they can receive their pension in their village since it costs them huge sums to go to Port Kaituma to collect their pension. The senior citizens contend that the pension is already inadequate and when they are compelled to travel long distances at high costs to receive their pension it affects them financially and physically since the travel in itself is burdensome because of the bad roads and it impacts them financially because they have to pay their way to collect the very small pension they receive. Residents reminded the visiting team that under the APNU+AFC they received their pension in their village.

Persons in the Region are contending that there is a need to decentralize the distribution of passports since it costs them a lot to travel out of their community to obtain passports. This proposal has been endorsed by many who contend that one of the reasons for decentralizing services is

to ensure that they are accessible to all residents wherever they find themselves.

Residents also condemn the infrastructural work being done in the Region as shabby, unprofessional and the waste of taxpayers‟ money. At Port Kaituma, residents showed us the poor work that is being done on a wharf being built by the government. We were able to witness that the wharf has already cracked and is sinking. Clearly, the government and people of the Region #1 are not getting value for money.

At Barabina in the Mabaruma SubRegion, a bridge under construction has already been washed away and remedial action was being taken when the Leader of the Opposition Team visited the site.

There is deep concern all across the Region that many of these projects are just avenues for corruption and putting money in the hands of PPP families, friends and favourites. Ω

Opposition lauds High Court’s ruling on right to strike and collective bargaining

- a blow against gov‟t efforts to abuse workers‟ rights and freedoms

The parliamentary Opposition, A Partnership of National Unity and Alliance for Change (APNU+AFC) considers the ruling on Friday (19th April) by High Court Judge Sandil Kissoon that the Guyana Teachers Union (GTU) led strike was legal a significant reaffirmation of workers‟ rights

In a recent statement, the coalition said they see the ruling as a blow against the People‟s Progressive Party (PPP) government in its efforts to abuse the rights and freedoms of workers and other Guyanese and to control public institutions.

“The High Court, correctly in our view, reversed the vengeful antiunion actions of the government to deduct the salaries of teachers who participated in the month-long strike in February, and to discontinue deducting union dues from the salaries of teachers for the union. We share in the Court‟s condemnation of the government‟s actions as „arbitrary, unilateral, and discriminatory.‟”

The Opposition also called on Guyanese to take note Justice Kissoon found it necessary to expose the unprofessional and deceptive conduct of senior public servants in the Ministries of Education and Labour, particularly the Chief Education Officer. The Judge in his ruling said he found Chief Education Officer, Saddam Hussain‟s testimony not credible and his actions “self-serving .“

“While we, in the Opposition, understand the political pressures under which senior public servants work, we call on them to uphold their integ-

rity and resist becoming pawns and lackeys of the PPP government.”

“We note that the government has announced its intention to appeal the High Court‟s ruling „to the CCJ, if necessary.‟ Teachers and workers must view this as a further demonstration of a government that is obsessed with authoritarian power. Guyanese, as one, must continue to stand up and resist. The PPP government is not the government we deserve.”

Guyanese deserve a government that respects the rights and freedoms of workers and all other citizens and that embraces the principles of good governance, the Opposition asserted “A government that sees workers‟ rights as human rights.”

The Opposition coalition said it continue to stand on the side of the GTU and the teachers of Guyana as they continue their fight for the respect, remuneration, and other rewards they duly deserve. “We are confident that justice will prevail, and the union and its capable legal team will ultimately succeed.”

The GTU approached the Court in February asking for a determination of Government‟s decision to deem the teachers strike illegal, deduct pay from teachers for the days they were on strike, and cessation of deduction and remittance of union. GTU‟s case was brought by its Second Vice President Julian Cambridge who was represented by attorney-at-law Darren Wade. In March the Guyana Trades Union Congress (GTUC), through its General Secretary Lincoln Lewis enjoined the case. GTUC was represented by Senior Counsel Roysdale Forde. (Village Voice)

Brooklyn, What Happened? Tough Questions

Guyana‟s President Irfaan Ali‟s recent visit to Brooklyn, NY, a borough often considered a source of hope for AfroGuyanese at home, turned out to be nothing short of an opportunity for Ali‟s administration to post multiple images parading Afro-Guyanese in his circus. Despite the suffering of many family members back home due to discrimination under his watch, Ali‟s circus-like spectacle, including riding a bike down Brooklyn streets à la Forbes Burnham, was met with a disturbing lack of scrutiny from the AfroGuyanese community members he met.

Former minister Simona Broomes, however, has emerged refreshingly, as a voice of dissent, delivering a spirited response to the diaspora‟s complacency. She rightfully pointed out the glaring issues of discrimination and oppression faced by Afro-Guyanese under Ali‟s leadership. Broomes‟ impassioned push for accountability fell on deaf ears as the community failed to challenge Ali on crucial issues of racism and inequality back home. Broomes‟ powerful words echoed the sentiment of many who feel betrayed by both their leader and the Brooklyn community‟s silence, although it

Cocaine in, cocaine out - former President David Granger condemns Govt’s failure to tighten system to stop narco trafficking

The United States (US) Drug Enforcement Administration‟s notification of its offshore interception of a semisubmersible vessel with a 2,370 kg cocaine cargo by a US Navy Guided Missile Cruiser on 21 March 2024 confirmed Guyana‟s „major league‟ status as an international narco-trafficking entrepôt. This year‟s revelation was a reminder of the discovery of a similar self-propelled, semi-submersible vessel in the Barima-Waini Region ten years ago on 14 August 2014 which provided evidence that Guyana was sailing into narco-statehood .

Former President David Granger, in examining the importation and exportation of cocaine on the programme –

The Public Interest – pointed out that Guyanese are still writhing from the secondary impact of the massacres and murders of the „drug-gang warfare‟ during the „Troubles‟ under the PPP/C administration earlier this century. Despite a five-year hiatus under the 2015-2020 APNU+AFC administration, industrial scale narco-trafficking resurged in the absence of a coherent strategy, strong structure and political will to eradicate the crime.

Mr. Granger iterated the fact that Guyana is particularly vulnerable because its hinterland – which comprises over three-quarters of its territory –has unpatrolled open spaces; unmonitored airstrips, unpoliced land borders, an unwatched coastline and numberless rivers and creeks which can be channels for illegal narcotics. Narco-trafficking seems to be rising in response to a „surge in both supply and demand for cocaine.‟

Unit 30 years ago but the unit has been deformed by birth defects which crimped its capability and competence from its conception. The PPPC, on reentering office in August 2020, quickly disestablished the National AntiNarcotics Agency and dissolved the National Drug Strategy Master Plan initiated by the APNU administration to curtail narco-trafficking comprehensively. The PPPC administration resists deploying the defence and police forces in sufficient strength to patrol our land borders and to secure our airspace, seaspace and rivers, preferring, instead, to employ the security forces on glamorous municipal missions on the coastland.

should be rightly noted that Ali‟s visit was not announced, he basically sneaked into Brooklyn to avoid protests from the masses. Broomes rightly called out the dictator-like behavior of Ali, who rather than sit down and work out issues with the African community at home, prefers to put on a clown-show for the UN and other international bodies seemingly to say, “See? Black people love me.”

The visit to Brooklyn was a missed opportunity for the diaspora to demand justice and change. Instead of challenging Ali on his record of oppression, they chose to dance to his tune, enabling his authoritarian rule to continue unchallenged. Simona Broomes should be lauded for standing firm in the face of adversity, and refusing to bow down to oppression. She reminded the diaspora that true freedom comes from speaking truth to power, even if it means facing backlash. (Village Voice News)

The former president reminded that the People‟s Progressive Party has been in government for twenty-seven of the last thirty-two years since 1992 – a period that coincided with Guyana‟s emergence as transnational cocaine-exporting state. Memorable confiscations of cocaine include 3,000 kg on MV Danielsen in October 1998; 1.5 tonnes in a container of rice in Hamburg, Germany in August 2020; 11.5 tonnes in a container of scrap metal in Antwerp, Belgium in November 2020; and 50 kg in a container of rum in Rotterdam, The Netherlands – all shipped through Guyana. Five foreign, cocaineladen, light aircraft are known to have landed, illegally, since August 2020.

The PPPC administration had created its cherished Customs Anti-Narcotics

Granger expressed the view that Guyana needs the restoration of a strong National Anti-Narcotics Agency; an enforceable National Drug Strategy Master Plan and an intelligent Ministry of Public Security which has a grip of the task of suppressing transnational crime and knows the importance of keeping citizens safe from the violence of narco-trafficking.

Narco-traffickers will continue to bring cocaine into the country and will find ways and means to get it out to foreign markets. The PPPC and CANU have had decades to demonstrate their resolve to curtail the importation and exportation of cocaine by air, land and sea. They failed.

(Village Voice News)

Mr. David A. Granger Fmr. President of Guyana

Simona Broomes Fmr. Minister

POLITICAL

THE PARLIAMENTARY OPPOSITION

CALLS FOR A FULL INVESTIGATION OF NPTAB AND THE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SYSTEM

The findings of the Public Procurement Commission (PPC) on the Tepui contract for the construction of the Belle Vue pump station have outraged Guyanese across the political spectrum. We, in the Opposition, firmly believe that the Tepui contract scandal is only the tip of a large iceberg. Indeed, NPTAB was barefaced enough to inform the PPC that it awarded similar pump station contracts to others who also did not have the experience and prerequisites. We are convinced that breaches of the procurement laws and the award of contracts to the friends, families and favorites of the PPP government occur regularly and are in the tens of billions of dollars.

We, therefore, believe that calls for only a criminal investigation of the Evaluation Committee for the Tepui contract or the revocation of the contract fail to recognise the magnitude of the mismanagement, corruption, and political interference in the contract award system under the PPP. Nothing short of radical overhaul and total cleansing is needed. Guyanese must note that the government‟s entire cap-

ital budget is processed through the public procurement system. We are dealing with hundreds of billions of dollars annually. In 2023, the capital budget was G$388B. In 2024, it is a galloping $666B, approximately 58% of the entire national budget.

Let us recall that the award of government contracts was a “Herdmanston issue.” – meaning that in the aftermath of the 1997 election and public protest, the award of contracts was explicitly identified by all stakeholders as a matter of central importance for race relations, social justice, and equal opportunity in Guyana. The 1999 Constitution Reform Commission (CRC) agreed, therefore, to establish the Public Procurement Commission as a body with constitutional powers to address this national problem.

But the PPP, during its previous term in office, thwarted both the establishment and the functioning of PPC. In fact, it was under the Coalition government in 2016 that the PPC was reestablished after an absence of a decade under the PPP.

Given the PPP‟s track record, it is no

City council does not need a bailout, it needs the monies owed by the government

(Continued from Page 2)

… who would wish citizens to believe that we are incapable. Whilst the government and its actors rush to say that we cannot manage the city, I ask them to consider the glaring deficiencies in many government ministries, and agencies even though they are awash with oil resources. The point I wish to make here is that organizational weaknesses are not unique to the city council; they exist in all public and private organisations and institutions.

Finally, it is interesting to note that the editorial under review did not mention one word about taxes owed to the council by central government, corporations and businesses. Government Ministries and agencies owe the council in excess of 6 Billion dollars. We have been pleading with government to honour its obligations but to no avail. Instead, they choose to infringe on the responsibilities of the council and carry out works to city facilities without consulting with or any reference to us. There are numerous instances where those works have been done in a shabby manner. This approach by central government and its agents is unlawful and wrong. It derecognizes separation of powers, and true democratic governance. Also, some big businesses continue to default on their civic responsibility to the city and we will address this soon with an attempt to remedy based on the law. If the government did the right thing and pay its taxes to

Mr.

Alfred Mentore, JP Mayor of the City of Georgetown

the city then we would be in a position to provide better services and stay on schedule with our maintenance plan. This is not the case. As I said at previous forums, the city council does not need a bailout we need our taxes; monies owed to us by the government. I use this letter as another opportunity to ask the government to pay its taxes to the city soon! Also, I urge all defaulters to come forward and settle their accounts. We need every cent to provide vital municipal services to local communities. Ω

wonder that the government‟s only response on the Tepui contact scandal was to say, through its Minister for Finance, that it wishes “to assure the Guyanese public that this PPP/C government, led by His Excellency President Dr. Irfaan Ali, remains firmly and unwaveringly committed to good governance and accountability, including through the maintenance and preservation of public bodies that can withstand scrutiny.” Sheer platitudes! Sheer hypocrisy! The government evidently regards Guyanese as either blind or fools.

Because the Tepui contract award and the other such dubious awards are merely the tip of the iceberg, we in the Opposition call for:

1. A full and thorough investigation of NPTAB and the public procurement system.

2. The enactment of legislation to give the PPC clear-cut powers to revoke contracts and impose penalties whenever breaches, non-compliance, and fraud are discovered.

3. The urgent drafting and enforce-

ment of regulations by the PPC using its powers under the current procurement act.

4. The termination of the Tepui contract in keeping with the position of former Public Procurement Commission Chair Carol Corbyn‟s remarks. She said that the Commission should “recommend” to the procuring entity that they terminate this contract– though, as we said, this will not solve the core problems.

What we want to emphasize, in closing, is that what we are facing with the PPP is a total lack of political will to stamp out corruption and cronyism. They have deliberately decided not to enforce the law, to empower only a narrow section of elite society, and as a result even the changes we recommend must be met with political change. Otherwise, we will continue to hear idle talk and no action. Guyanese must use their vote to ensure the PPP is prevented from further undermining our government and its institutions. Ω

As more FPSOs come on stream, Jagdeo cavalier approach to the oil sector must come to an end

The Opposition notes that Exxon, after receiving all government approvals, announced last week it will commence development of its sixth Stabroek Block operation at Whiptail. This development, we are informed, will take Guyana‟s oil production to approximately 1.3 million barrels per day. This news followed the announcement last month of a new oil discovery at the Bluefin well in the Stabroek Block, taking the tally of discoveries to more than 30.

Guyanese can be forgiven for greeting these announcements with growing indifference, given that little, if any, of this oil wealth is reaching them. Nevertheless, it is the duty of the Opposition to remain vigilant in protecting the nation‟s endowment.

With more and more oil discoveries and developments in Guyana, it has become increasingly critical that the cavalier and perilous handling by Bharrat Jagdeo of the oil sector must come to an end now. The longer he remains, Guyana stands to lose more and more revenue and face more and more environmental risks.

As Guyana joins the league of mega oil producers, we call on the PPP government to urgently:

1. make a serious and systematic effort to build our human resource capacity to ensure we can monitor all aspects of the operations of oil companies. It is apparent that the government does not want to invest in capacity building for its own political self -serving motives.

2. establish the Petroleum Commission and staff it with experts and professionals who can en-

sure that all aspects of the oil industry (be it legal, financial, environmental, technical, or operational) are conducted in the best possible manner, as opposed to the current Jagdeo oneman fiasco of ineptitude and ignorance.

3. release the projected combined cash flow data for the existing and approved developments (from Liza to Whiptail). Let us re -emphasize the importance of this information: it would tell us of the extent and rate at which the company is expected to recoup its investments, so that we can assess how soon the country will get more revenues not just from higher production, but through an increase in profit oil. While demands for a better contract focus on the royalty and ring-fencing aspects, we restate our view that the country must also target greater profit oil to extract a larger proportion of revenues. Such an approach, however, requires a more judicious oil extraction policy, one which is absent today, but one which we, as the next government, have pledged to finalize with the company.

We make these and other demands on the government knowing fully well that it will soon have to demit office after the next election. However, given the high stakes involved in our oil sector, every day Jagdeo and the PPP/C remain in office increases our financial losses and environmental risks. It goes without saying that the Coalition will implement these and other measures as the next government. Ω

HEALTH

Dengue Fever - Symptoms and Treatment

Key Facts

 1 in 4: About one in four people infected with dengue will get sick.

 For people who get sick with dengue, symptoms can be mild or severe.

 Severe dengue can be lifethreatening within a few hours and often requires care at a hospital.

Symptoms

 Mild symptoms of dengue can be confused with other illnesses that cause fever, aches and pains, or a rash.

The most common symptom of dengue is fever with any of the following:

 Nausea, vomiting

 Rash

 Aches and pains (eye pain, typically behind the eyes, muscle, joint, or bone pain)

 Any warning sign

Symptoms of dengue typically last 2–7 days. Most people will recover after about a week.

Treatment

 There is no specific medicine to treat dengue.

 Treat the symptoms of dengue and see your healthcare provider.

If you think you have dengue

 See a healthcare provider if you develop a fever or have symptoms of dengue. Tell him or her about your travel.

 Rest as much as possible.

 Take acetaminophen (also known as paracetamol) to control fever and relieve pain.

 Do not take aspirin or ibuprofen!

 Drink plenty of fluids to stay hydrated. Drink water or drinks with added electrolytes.

 For mild symptoms, care for a

sick infant, child, or family member at home.

Symptoms of dengue can become severe within a few hours. Severe dengue is a medical emergency.

Severe dengue

 About 1 in 20 people who get sick with dengue will develop severe dengue.

 Severe dengue can result in shock, internal bleeding, and even death.

 If you have had dengue in the past, you are more likely to develop severe dengue.

 Infants and pregnant women are at higher risk for developing severe dengue.

Symptoms of severe dengue

Warning signs of severe dengue

Watch for signs and symptoms of severe dengue. Warning signs usually begin in the 24–48 hours after your fever has gone away.

Immediately go to a local clinic or emergency room if you or a family member has any of the following symptoms.

 Belly pain, tenderness

 Vomiting (at least 3 times in 24 hours)

 Bleeding from the nose or gums

 Vomiting blood, or blood in the stool

 Feeling tired, restless, or irritable

Treatment of severe dengue

 If you have any warning signs, see a healthcare provider or go to the emergency room immediately.

 Severe dengue is a medical emergency. It requires immediate medical care at a clinic or hospital.

 If you are traveling, find health care abroad (www.cdc.gov)

Genital HPV Infection

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the United States. HPV vaccines can prevent some of the health effects HPV causes. This fact sheet answers basic questions about HPV.

What is HPV?

HPV is the most common STI. There were about 43 million HPV infections in 2018, many among people in their late teens and early 20s. There are many different types of HPV. Some types can cause health problems, including genital warts and cancers. But there are vaccines that can stop these health problems from happening. HPV is a different virus than HIV and HSV (herpes).

How is HPV spread?

You can get HPV by having vaginal, anal, or oral sex with someone who has the virus. It is most commonly spread during vaginal or anal sex. It also spreads through close skin-to-skin touching during sex. A person with HPV can pass the infection to someone even when they have no signs or symptoms.

If you are sexually active, you can get HPV, even if you have had sex with only one person. You also can develop symptoms years after having sex with someone who has the infection. This makes it hard to know when you first got it.

Does HPV cause health problems?

In most cases (9 out of 10), HPV goes away on its own within two years without health problems. But when HPV does not go away, it can cause health problems like genital warts and cancer. Genital warts usually appear as a small bump or group of bumps in the genital area. They can be small or large, raised or flat, or shaped like a cauliflower. A healthcare provider can usually diagnose warts by looking at the genital area.

Does HPV cause cancer?

HPV can cause cervical and other cancers, including cancer of the vulva, vagina, penis, or anus. It can also cause cancer in the back of the throat (called oropharyngeal cancer). This can include the base of the tongue and tonsils.

Cancer often takes years, even decades, to develop after a person gets HPV. Genital warts and cancers result from different types of HPV.

There is no way to know who will develop cancer or other health problems from HPV. People with weak immune systems (including those with HIV) may be less able to fight off HPV. They may also be more likely to develop health problems from HPV. How can I avoid HPV and the health problems it can cause?

You can do several things to lower your chances of getting HPV. Get vaccinated. The HPV vaccine is safe and effective. It can protect against diseases (including cancers) caused by HPV when given in the recommended age groups. (See “Who

should get vaccinated?” below.)

Get screened for cervical cancer

Routine screening for women aged 21 to 65 years old can prevent cervical cancer.

If you are sexually active:

 Use condoms the right way every time you have sex. This can lower your chances of getting HPV. But HPV can infect areas the condom does not cover. So, condoms may not fully protect against getting HPV; and

 Be in a mutually monogamous relationship – or have sex only with someone who only has sex with you.

Who should get the HPV vaccine?

CDC recommends HPV vaccination for:

 All preteens (including boys and girls) at age 11 or 12 years (or can start at age 9 years).

 Everyone through age 26 years, if not vaccinated already.

Vaccination is not recommended for everyone older than age 26 years. However, some adults age 27 through 45 years who are not already vaccinated may decide to get the HPV vaccine after speaking with their healthcare provider about their risk for new HPV infections and the possible benefits of vaccination. HPV vaccination in this age range provides less benefit. Most sexually active adults have already been exposed to HPV, although not necessarily all of the HPV types targeted by vaccination.

At any age, having a new sex partner is a risk factor for getting a new HPV infection. People who are already in a long-term, mutually monogamous relationship are not likely to get a new HPV infection.

How do I know if I have HPV?

There is no test to find out a person‟s “HPV status.” Also, there is no approved HPV test to find HPV in the mouth or throat.

There are HPV tests that can screen for cervical cancer. Healthcare providers only use these tests for screening women aged 30 years and older. HPV tests are not recommended to screen men, adolescents, or women under the age of 30 years.

Most people with HPV do not know they have the infection. They never develop symptoms or health problems from it. Some people find out they have HPV when they get genital warts. Women may find out they have HPV when they get an abnormal Pap test result (during cervical cancer screening). Others may only find out once they‟ve developed more serious problems from HPV, such as cancers.

I’m pregnant. Will having HPV affect my pregnancy?

Pregnant people with HPV can get genital warts or develop abnormal cell changes on the cervix. Routine cervical cancer screening can help find abnormal cell changes. You should get routine cervical cancer screening even when you are pregnant. Ω (https://www.cdc.gov/)

NEW NATION

The PPP continues to interfere in Indigenous Village Elections

The PPP‟s Minister of Amerindian Affairs continues to meddle in the elections of Indigenous Villages. Her intention is to determine who gets elected in each Village, in keeping with the known PPP policy of domination and control.

In one case, the Minister is on record as saying that only Amerindians are eligible to participate in the electoral process. She speaks of nonAmerindians and “those who don‟t look like us” in describing the mixed descendants of Indigenous Guyanese and Guyanese of other ethnicities. The latter description is cause for worry. It is a matter that any functioning Ethnic Relations Commission would have a keen interest in inquiring into.

The Minister is patently wrong in her pronouncement regarding the ineligibility of non-Amerindians to participate in the Village election process. Further, her observations laid bare two conflicting provisions of the Amerindian Act. This fact begs the question, why the PPP is hell bent on resisting calls for the resumption of the consultative process intended to result in a revised Amerindian Act?

Section 2 of the Act defines an “Amerindian” as “… any citizen of Guyana who –

a) Belongs to any of the native or aboriginal peoples of Guyana, or b) Is a descendant of any person mentioned in paragraph (a);”

It follows, logically, that for Pauline Sukhai to live by her publicly stated position on eligibility for participation in Village elections, the element of DNA testing may become necessary.

Section 2 also defines “resident” as, “… an individual –

a) Who is an Amerindian who was born in, lives in or has his principal place within the Village… ;

or

b) Who lives within the Village and is recognised as a resident by the membership rules of the Village;”

Section 69 (1) (a) provides that the Village Council “Shall” “compile an electoral list of all adult residents” no later than sixty days before the election date. This is clear evidence that “residents” as opposed to “Amerindians” are qualified for inclusion on the voters‟ roll and are entitled to vote. The Minister should read the Act and operate based on the Law.

The law stipulating the publication of the list at least sixty days before the election is being violated since most of the villages were not given the sixty days‟ notice as is stipulated in the Law.

The conflict arises when it comes to eligibility to hold office in the Village.

Section 71 (1) (a) through (d) lists the prerequisites for one to be elected as a Councillor. Among those is that one should be “… an Amerindian of at least eighteen years of age…”

How can one be eligible to elect one‟s leaders but not be eligible to be elected as a leader? Can you imagine what it would be like if our Constitution said that citizens could elect a government but only one category of citizens can offer themselves as candidates? This is clearly an attempt to exclude persons the PPP are unable to control.

The PPP holds on to the Amerindian Act as is, refusing to consult with the Indigenous citizens of Guyana with regard to their demand for its revision. We call on the government to immediately resume the nationwide consultation aimed at revising the Amerindian Act. These consultations which begun under the APNU+AFC were well advanced. The Minister has

in her possession the Reports which emanated from the consultative process, and she must act.

This conflict in the legislation is causing major discomfort for residents in some Villages. We have received reports that the names of socalled non-Amerindians are being removed from the voters‟ lists in some Villages. In many reported cases, persons of other ethnicities living in Villages for more than fifty years, married to Indigenous spouses, their union producing children, and grandchildren, watch on in horror as Village Councils post voters‟ lists from which their names have been deleted. This is electoral fraud.

The PPP government is causing serious divisions in Villages. Massive disenfranchisement is taking place. Families are now embroiled in conflict over exclusion from the electoral process. Children of Indigenous and mixed parentage can no longer participate in the electoral process PPP operatives now have no regard for their Indigenous lineage and the definition of “resident” in the legislation.

Over in Campbelltown in Region #8, former Toshao Marbel Thomas who was unlawfully removed from her elected office soon after the PPP assumed office has again been a target of Pauline Sukhai. Ms. Thomas told her story on social media. She claims that after being nominated, seconded, and having her name placed on the list of nominees for the position of Toshao, the returning officer received a phone call. Following that call, Ms. Thomas alleged that the returning officer removed her name from the list of nominees. She alleged that the returning officer explained that he received instruction that caused him to remove her name. This is unlawful

and a manifestation of the dictatorial nature of the PPP. The PPP must allow the residents of Indigenous communities to elect the leaders of their choice and allow Returning Officers to function independently and not be dictated to by PPP politicians.

Marbel Thomas satisfies Section 71 of the Act in its entirety. Notwithstanding her unlawful removal from elected office, she did not present herself as a candidate in the election immediately following her removal. She was never convicted of any criminal offense. What then is her crime? Only Pauline Sukhai can enlighten us as to the reason(s) for Marbel Thomas not being eligible to be a candidate for the Campbelltown Village election. Vindictive is a word that springs to mind, because the Minister seems not to care about the massive allegations of corruption on the part of some elected officials whom the PPP supports for re -election.

Pauline Sukhai must tell the Indigenous population of Guyana the reason some Villages enjoy one month between nomination and election dates while others have only one to four days in some cases, and in others, both nomination and elections being conducted on the same day. In some cases, the tradition of holding elections on Sundays to facilitate the full participation of Villagers who work outside of the Village is now being discarded and conveniently abandoned.

These Village elections in 2024 are laying bare the PPP desire for total domination and control of the Indigenous Guyanese population. The Indigenous peoples of Guyana reject, in the strongest terms, the PPP‟s unrelenting campaign to exercise total domination and control over their very lives. Ω

Town Week, 2024: The official launching ceremony of Linden Town Week 2024 commenced on Sunday 28th April 2024 at the Linden

keeping with the 54th Anniversary of Linden and hosted by the Municipality of Linden. Attending the event were Leader of the PNCR and Opposition, Mr.

C. Norton along with many officials of the Linden municipality, Councillors, Members of Parliament, among others. The opening ceremony of Linden Town Week featured cultural performances and individuals were honoured for their significant contributions to the Town and where students in Linden were also recognised for their achievements and outstanding performances in essay writing, impromptu speeches, and the 2023 CSEC and CAPE examinations.

Linden

Bus Park in

Aubrey

NEW NATION

The success of Team Guyana at the CARIFTA Games is a source of immense pride and inspiration

for the nation

Once again, Congratulations to Team Guyana for their outstanding performance at the CARIFTA Games 2024.

It was such a joy listening to the broadcast and hear commentators using the phrase "Athletes from Guyana" regularly during the competition. The pride your fellow Guyanese felt as you performed brilliantly cannot be quantified. For this we are thankful. We anticipate many more successes as you keep the Golden Arrowhead flying high in all its majesty.

We wish to also congratulate the parents and coaches for their hard work and dedication in preparing the athletes for a successful competition.

It is clear that the success of Team Guyana at the CARIFTA Games is a source of immense pride and inspiration for the nation. However, the challenges and sacrifices made by parents and coaches behind the scenes need to be commended even as they highlight the need for greater support and investment in sport policies, programmes and the necessary infrastructure.

The financial burden on parents for travel expenses and the substandard training environments faced by athletes underscore the necessity for government‟s intervention to provide ade-

quate facilities and financial assistance.

While we need to give significant support to our athletes that win medals, we also need to ensure all our athletes are provided for so that a wider range can experience success and bring home more medals. This is crucial for fostering a thriving sports culture. Sports should not be used to achieve political objectives, especially narrow political objectives. There should be established criteria for the selection of athletes representing Guyana. There should be clear protocols for receiving athletes returning from competitions. These responsibilities should fall exclusively to the particular sports association.

Investment in sport infrastructure across various regions is essential for nurturing talent and promoting sport as recreation and business and tourism opportunities that benefit all stakeholders. In this regard, it is inconceivable that the government has failed to complete the track and field facilities in Linden and New Amsterdam which began before the change of government in 2020. Additionally, we recommend the construction of a track and field facility at an appropriate venue in Region #4.

Obituary

The PNCR is saddened to learn of the tragic passing of our teachers who were killed in a boat accident on the early morning of Friday 5th April 2024. Sir Adrian Thomas and Ms. Helen Rebai, a young man and woman that were full of life, was busy trying to complete their studies at Cyril Potter College of Education. They had so much to give but maybe it was not meant to be .

We are not privy to the full details of the accident but we must pause to call on the relevant authorities to launch an investigation into this. To their sorrowing relatives, the school family and the residents of Kumaka, please accept our heartfelt condolences at this time.

Definitely gone too soon! May their souls rest in peace and rise in glory.

Ms. Helen Rebai

Opposition Shadow Minister of Culture, Youth and Sports, Ms. Nima Flue-Bess, MP, poses here with one of the athletes on their arrival at the Cheddi Jagan Airport on Tuesday evening, 2nd April 2024.

Tragic loss of our teachers of Kumaka Road, Santa Rosa

Sir Adrian Thomas

Leader of the PNCR and Opposition, Mr. Aubrey C. Norton attended the 100th birth anniversary of Ms. Vera Venture of Queenstown, Essequibo. On Thursday 25th April 2024, where he wished her long life, good health and happiness. The Party Leader presented her with a bouquet of flowers and other goodies on her birthday.