Epaper – March 22-2022 ISB

Page 1

Tuesday, 22 March, 2022 I 18 Sha’ban, 1443 I Rs 15.00 I Vol XII No 263 I 14 Pages I Islamabad Edition

No-coNfideNce motioN: iNdividual vote of aN mP has No status: sc ISLAMABAD

a

Staff RepoRt

FTeR associating with a party, the vote of an MP during a no-confidence trial was a “collective right” of that legislator and their party, and that an individual vote, violating the party’s position on the matter, enjoyed no “status” under Article 95-II of the Constitution, the Supreme Court said on Monday. The Supreme Court formed on Monday a five-member larger bench on a presidential reference seeking its opinion on Article 63-A of the Constitution, which deals with the disqualification of parliamentarians over defection.

g

No INTeRFeReNCe To HALT THe PRoCeSS oF ARTICLe 95

Names of the judges who will constitute the bench are yet to be finalised. The reference was submitted by Attorney General of Pakistan (AGP) Khalid Jawed Khan earlier today. Separately, Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial observed that there should not be any interference to halt the process of Article 95 of the Constitution which permits a no-confidence motion against the incumbent prime minister. The twomember bench that also includes Justice Munib Akhtar made these remarks while hearing a petition of the Supreme Court Bar Association

(SCBA) that sought the intervention of the apex court to prevent “anarchy” on the day of the no-trust vote. SCBA President Muhammad Ahsan Bhoon had asked the court to restrain “political parties from holding public meetings in Islamabad before voting on the no-confidence motion”. The petition had also prayed the court to stop government agencies from arresting or detaining MNAs and to stop public gatherings in the federal capital which prevented the assembly members from reaching parliament. “The purpose of Supreme Court

proceedings is that the right of lawmakers [to cast vote] must not be defeated,” CJP Bandial said. The bench also refused to intervene in the matter concerning the delay of the National Assembly session by the speaker. It advised the counsels representing the opposition leaders to raise this matter in parliament. In a reference to the attack on the Sindh House by PTI workers, the court said it expected that the Sindh government’s version will also be included in FIR. The court also issued notices to all major parties on the presidential reference as a larger bench would be expected to hear the presidential reference on March 24.

CONTINUED ON PAGE 05

Response sought from govt on plea against journalist protection law ISLAMABAD Staff RepoRt

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday directed the Ministr y of Human Rights to submit its response on a petition moved against the Protection of Journalists and Media Professionals Act, 2021. A single bench comprising IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah heard the petition. The ministr y didn’t file its response despite having been given a month’s time. The court directed the ministr y to submit its comments at the next hearing and adjourned the case until April 12. The petition has challenged the definition of journalist as well as Section 6 of the Protection of Journalists and Media Professionals Act, 2021. In November last, the National Assembly passed seven bills, including the protection of journalists and media professionals bill. The lower house also witnessed the presentation of two ordinances as well. Minister for Law and Justice Farogh Naseem presented the bill.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.