In partnership with
Profit
GOVT FREE ALL WOMEN, KIDS AFTER SCATHING CRITICISM OF BRUTE POLICE ACTION Friday, 22 December, 2023 I 8 Jamada Al-Sani, 1445
CARETAKER MINISTER CLAIMS SITUATION WAS g HR BODIES, ANALYSTS AND POLITICIANS DEVELOPED ON PURPOSE WHERE POLICE CONDEMN ‘VIOLENT STATE CLASHED WITH BALOCH PROTESTERS CRACKDOWN’ ON BALOCH PROTESTERS
F g
Rs 15.00 | Vol XIV No 173 I 8 Pages I Lahore Edition
ISLAMABAD
STAFF REPORT
OLLOWING scathing criticism of the Islamabad police’s batoncharging and arrests of Baloch protesters, the caretaker government on Thursday announced release of all women and children without any exceptions. Addressing a presser here in Islamabad, caretaker Privatization Minister Fawad Hasan Fawad alongside Information Minister Murtaza Solangi and Culture Minister Syed Jamal Shah, informed that on the directives of Premier kakar, it was decided that all women and children, without any exceptions, will be released. He added that all men who had been identified were also been released. The development came hours after unanimous condemnations from human rights organisations, analysts and politicians had poured in criticizing the “violent state crackdown” on the Baloch protesters. Islamabad police had arrested dozens of Baloch men and women last night during a demonstration against enforced disappearances and extra-judicial killings. Videos of the arrests shared on social media showed security officials firing water cannons and tear gas on the protesters. They could also be seen dragging Baloch men and women into police vans and beating them with clubs.
The police also dismantled camps and loudspeakers set up by the demonstrators outside the National Press Club. Following the outcry, the government had formed a negotiating team comprising Solangi, Fawad and Shah to hold talks with the families of the protesters. During the press conference, Fawad said that a situation was developed on purpose where police clashed with protesters. He further said that the Islamabad police chief Akbar Nasir Khan had also presented the facts before the Islamabad High Court (IHC). He said that the IG told the court that protesters were present from beforehand and they did not instigate the chaos. Fawad said that there were some people present who had already made sure to cover their
IHC turns down Imran’s plea for suspension of Toshakhana case verdict ISLAMABAD
STAFF REPORT
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday turned Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan’s plea, seeking suspension of trial court’s verdict in the Toshakhana case. A two-judge IHC bench, comprising Chief Justice IHC Aamer Farooq and Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri announced the decision. In its ruling, the court stated that there is no provision in the law for reconsideration or modification of orders related to suspension. It stated that the Supreme Court had clarified that the suspension of a sentence did not mean the suspension of a decision. “In the instant case, no specific plea was raised and subsequent application has been made to cover up the omission. Even no extraordinary or exceptional circumstances were mentioned in the earlier application though they existed in the form of the notification dated 08.08.2023 when the application for suspension of the sentence was filed,” the court stated in its verdict. The ruling has effectively eliminated the possibility for the ex-PTI chairman to participate in the upcoming general elections, scheduled to be held on February 8, 2024. “Imran Khan’s request to suspend the decision in the Toshakhana criminal case was rejected so that the disqualification would remain,” Khan’s lawyer and spokesman on legal affairs, Naeem Haider Panjutha, said on X. Earlier this month, IHC had rejected a plea by Imran Khan to withdraw his appeal against his disqualification in the Toshakhana case. PTI’s lawyer Barrister Ali Zafar informed the courtroom that the former prime minister wanted to withdraw the appeal against the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) regarding his disqualification to refile it in the Lahore High Court (LHC). Justice Farooq, however, decided to retain Imran’s appeal against the ECP in the federal capital’s court. The Toshakhana is a state department which retains gifts given by state officials, foreign diplomats and heads of different governments. According to the Constitution of Pakistan, the recipient of the gifts must report them to the cabinet division and pay an appropriate amount if the said recipient wants to keep it personally.
PHC directs ECP to decide on PTI intra party polls, electoral symbol by today PESHAWAR
STAFF REPORT
Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Thursday directed the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to announce a decision on Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s (PTI) election symbol and recently-held intra-party polls by Friday (today). In the intra-party elections held earlier in December on the directives issued by the electoral body, Barrister Gohar Ali Khan was elected as the party’s new chairman. Gohar was nominated by Imran Khan, the founding chairman of PTI who is now incarcerated in Rawalpindi’s Adiala jail. A two-member bench of PHC heard the case related to PTI’s intra-party elections and election symbol. In today’s hearing, Justice Shakeel Ahmed questioned PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar, asking why they had not filed a case in the Islamabad High Court.
faces and had planned what to do. The minister said that the protesters had been advised to demonstrate at another location. “However, they did not pay heed to this advice and when they advanced, the local element which had plans to exploit the situation did so and created such a situation,” he said. The minister said that the government negotiating team met the protesters, who stated that they had no intention of creating a law and order situation. “As I said before, our conviction is that the protesters from Balochistan were not responsible [for this],” he said, adding that there were locals that wanted to exploit the situation. Fawad said that there were some people who were still being identified and investigated. He said that the
IHC had directed the Islamabad police chief to inform it about the process by tomorrow morning. “We have also asked the Islamabad IG to try and not seek more time tomorrow and to identify them. Because we think that a lot of things will come forward after [the process of] identification. Their origin and their identity will help to determine whether they were supposed to be present there or not or whether they were there for a particular purpose.” Fawad said that more than 90 percent of the men who were detained had been released. He further said that the government had also noted the “separate grievances” of the people and would bring them to the premier’s attention. He said that the “peaceful protest” had been ongoing for 23 days, and the Islamabad police and administration did not interfere as long as it was ongoing. “So to say that there is no permission for peaceful protests is not correct. Peaceful protests and any other kind of protest are restricted to the parameters of the law,” he said. The minister said that Pakistan’s security situation was in front of everyone. “The administration, police and intelligence agencies had clear and credible evidence that if people were gathered on a main street for an extended period of time, the situation would be exploited.”
CONTINUED ON PAGE 03
IHC serves notice on FIA on Imran’s plea against in-camera trial CYPHER CASE
ISLAMABAD STAFF REPORT
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday issued a notice to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on a petition filed by former prime minister Imran Khan challenging in-camera proceedings of the cypher trial at Adiala Jail. In his plea filed a day ago, the former premier challenged his trial in jail and subsequent developments, including the framing of charges and a gag order on the media. The Special Court (Official Secrets Act) had begun the cypher trial afresh last week at the Adiala district jail after Imran and former foreign minister Shah Mehmood
Qureshi were indicted for a second time in the case on Dec 13. The cypher case pertains to a diplomatic document that the Federal Investigation Agency’s charge sheet alleges was never returned by Imran. The PTI has long held that the document contained a threat from the United States to oust Imran as prime minister. The former premier and his aide Qureshi, who is also behind bars, were first indicted in the case on Oct 23. Both had pleaded not guilty. The trial was being held at Adiala Jail and four witnesses had already recorded their statements when the IHC termed the government’s notification for a jail trial “erroneous” and scrapped the entire
proceedings. The IHC had endorsed Imran’s indictment, disposing of his plea against the same, but had also instructed the special court judge to ensure a “fair trial”. On Dec 20, the IHC issued a detailed judgement explaining reasons for scrapping the earlier round of proceedings of the special court due to a lack of transparency and openness. The court linked the open court proceedings with the independence of the judicial system. On Tuesday’s hearing Imran’s legal counsel Barrister Salman Akram Raja appeared in court as Justice Miangul Hasan Aurangzeb began hearing the petition. Additional Attorney General Munawar Iqbal Duggal was also in attendance.
General elections to be held on Feb 8: Gen Asim Munir KARACHI
MONITORING REPORT
In a meeting with the Pakistani-American business community in the United States last week, Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Asim Munir assured them that elections “will be held on February 8”. The army chief’s remark came hours before the Supreme Court verdict on the conduct of polls on February 8 was issued on Friday evening. The issue was raised during General Asim Munir’s interaction with overseas Pakistanis at a dinner reception hosted by the Pakistan Embassy in Washington when a businessman posed the question to the army chief. Speaking with Geo News, Tanveer Ahmed, a Texas-based Pakistani businessman who was among the participants, quoted the army chief as saying, “As far as I know general elections will be held on the 8th of February.” While referring to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) petition, which at the time was heard in the Lahore High Court (LHC) against the ECP, the army chief said, “If elections get delayed due to that it won’t be beyond the limit when Senate elections are to be held,” Ahmed shared. The next Senate elections in Pakistan are likely to be held in March 2024. The LHC had suspended the electoral body’s notification to requisition returning officers (ROs) from bureaucracy on December 13, which created doubts over the holding of elections on time. However, the apex court suspended the high court verdict and directed the commission to proceed as per plan.
PML-N also seeks extension in deadline for filing nominations LAHORE
STAFF REPORT
After MQM-P and JUI-F, the Pakistan Muslim LeagueNawaz (PML-N) has sought a two-day extension in the December 22 deadline to file nomination papers for the upcoming general elections. As per the election schedule, nomination papers could be filed with respective returning officers by the candidates from December 20 to 22, while names of all nominated candidates would be published on December 23. According to guidelines issued by the electoral body, a candidate must be accompanied by two voters of the same constituency who would propose and second his nomination. However, no individual can become a proposer or seconder for more than one candidate. In a letter penned down to Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), Ishaq Dar – who is the chairman of the party’s election cell – noted that the election commission enjoys the power to make necessary “amendments in the schedule without affecting/changing the polling date”. The PML-N senator highlighted that a three-day deadline had been allocated for the filing of nomination papers while seven days had been given for the scrutiny of the same. “The process of filing nomination papers requires multiple details as well as documents to be annexed with the same which also includes NOCs/NECs from various public sector department. Such exercise is indeed time consuming and any lapse can lead to rejection of nomination papers,” Dar contended. “It is therefore requested that in order to facilitate thousands of candidates desirous to take part in elections, it would be appreciated if only two days’ extension is granted in filing of nomination paper by amending the schedule issued on December 15 without changing the polling day,” he concluded.