The Ontarion March 21st 2013

Page 1

the

T h e Un ive r s i t y o f Gu e l ph ’ s I n d ep en d en t Stu d en t New sp ap er

170.1 0 ◆ th ur s day, m a rc h 21 s t, 2 0 1 3 ◆ ww w.the onta rion .com

+ WEB- EXCLUSIVE PHOTO REEL

CSA REPS

COLLEGE ROYAL /

reversible features Plans put on hold

5 8 17

IMMIGRATION MYTHS VAGINA MONOLOGUES WATER POLO

contents 7 17 19 21 21 22 23 23

Arts & Culture Sports & Health Life Opinion Editorial Crossword Community Listings Classifieds

centre

LGBTQ proposal for community coordinator position denied Andrew Donovan Recently, the LGBTQ community at Guelph was faced with a denial of their proposition to increase the compulsory non-tuition fees by three per cent. The raise would have provided the funds to staff a fulltime professional to help progress the status of LGBTQ on campus. The proposal for a community coordinator is one of a few ideas the community has to help bring together people who want a sense of community or are going through difficult situations. According to Barry Townshend, manager at the Centre for New Students, students are still being ridiculed on and off campus for their sexual orientations. The results from a recent survey taken would confirm the statements made by Townshend. “All 29 students who identified themselves as LGBTQ talked about either being targeted personally, supporting friends who had been targeted, experiencing intolerance indirectly (overhearing negative comments) or feeling like they were perceived as an outsider or different.” The proposal that was submitted to the Compulsory Non-Tuition

courtesy

While the fee increase did not get approved, there may be other attempts to find a community coordinator for the LGBTQ community in the future. Fee Committee was declined for a of a tuition freeze (or cutbacks), number of reasons. It wasn’t that and on the other hand, there is the members didn’t support the the reality that scaling back fees initiative and good spirited intent will also scale back the rather proto create a sense of safety and be- gressive intentions of ideas such as longing for students on campus. the one proposed by the LGBTQ It was the issue of raising fees that community. was cause for concern among the Townshend noted that the committee. Aboriginal Resource Centre on The decision to decline the pro- campus and the Office of Interposal reveals a dichotomy. On one cultural Affairs are the models that hand, there are many students they’re looking at replicating, both walking around campus with the of which have three staff positions. red square badge on their backAlong with the proposal were pack, representing their support over 900 signatures on a petition,

37 e-mails of support, and an additional 721 signatures online. Granted, the support of such a position wasn’t unanimous, but it did present the committee with overwhelming evidence that despite the reluctance to raise fees by most students, there is still a substantial population that can be convinced to raise fees if it is for an idea that they support. The CSA also gave its endorsement for increasing support for LGBTQ students, but acknowledged ...se e lg btq pag e 4


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The Ontarion March 21st 2013 by The Ontarion - Issuu