Ahmet OKUTAN Architect & Engineer
Ahmet Okutan (13-11-1996)
+90 (539) 219 0096
34768 – İstanbul, Turkiye
ahmetnoyanokutan@gmail.com
Profession Architect, Engineer & BIM Consultant
Current position
University Lecturer at İstanbul Medipol University
Sector
Architecture – BIM, Engineering BEM
Education
Ozyegin University–Bachelor (2014-19)
Architecture
(3.36/4.0 GPa)
Politecnico di Milano–Master (2020-23)
Building and Architectural Engineering (103/110 GPa)
Registration
Union of Chambers of Turkish
Engineers and Architects
No. 67220 / 34-8620
Language Knowledge
Turkish, Mother Tongue
English, Professional Knowledge
Russian, Beginne
Certification BIM Specialist
Driving License B
In line with my Architectural and Building Engineering education and experience, I had the opportunity to work with different people, take part in a team, and learn how to produce together Among the things can do are architectural project design, consultancy, energy modelling, BIM, building systems analysis and reporting, advanced facade design and reporting, building physics consultancy, material analysis reporting, and be inside of integrated operations related to AEC industry
Selected Projects • İstanbul Medipol University Digital Design Tools Studio – İstanbul (10-2023/…) BIM Consultant University Lecturer: - BIM Consultancy to ongoing studio projects.
• 3-im Virtual Projects / Zayed National Museum – Abu Dhabi (09-2022/02-2023)
BIM Consultant: 3D/2D – back-office architectural drafting
• Avalon Co. / Pirelli Service & Storage Complex – Istanbul Gebze (10-2019/03-2023)
BIM Consultant & Specialist: Coordination and management of personnel in the field and in the back office - coordination of BIM architectural / structural / plant parts - BIM 3D 2D - back-office and field consultancy for site management after 4D simulation of construction management and safety operations, cost time management.
• Renaissance Construction / Financial Center Towers - Istanbul (06-2018/09-2018)
BIM Modeler: 2D, 3D – Technical Modeler on back office
• Suryapi Construction / Lavender - Istanbul (06-2017/08-2017)
2D - back office and field architect for the site after and safety management operations, cost / time management.
• Directorate General of Foundations of Turkiye Kaptan Pasha Complex – Istanbul(06-2016/08-2016)
Restoration of Ottoman Palaces. Creating technical drawings of the building, Material and Damage analysis on the building, providing solution offers and applying the approved ones on the site. Coordinating the application process.
IT and Software Skills
Institution:
İSTANBUL MEDIPOL UNIVERSITY
Faculty: Architecture & Design
Registered Lectures:
• Interdisciplinary Studios
• Interior Architectural Modeling Techniques in BIM Environment
Teaching Language: English
Teaching Methodology:
•INTEGRATED SYSTEM DESIGN
1. Prepearation of System Designs Details and Identification of BIM Objects (Revit)
2. MEP Modelling Mechanical Bimprojectcloud.app Revit MEP)
3. MEP Modelling Electrical Bimprojectcloud.app Revit MEP)
4. MEP Modelling Plumbing ( Bimprojectcloud.app Revit MEP)
5. Creating a Work Plan (Navisworks
6. Prepearation of Bid Documents by using BIM Softwares
•INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIOS
1. Introduction to BIM, BIM Concepts & Techniques
2. Context Feasibility Analysis (GH Plug-ins)
3. Topography Modelling by using AI (Autodesk Forma)
4. Structural Modelling and Analysis (Skyciv)
5. Generative Design (Fusion360, Dynamo, Grasshopper, Planfinder etc.)
6. Cost Analysis: Scheduling, Material Takeoff and nD Planning (Bexel Manager)
ve Participant Programs:
Arch tecture nter or Arch tecture Civil Engineering, Industrial Design
Students’ Profile
Seniors & Junior
Amount of Registered Students: 160
References:
Ömer Ceran -Rector, Professor
İstanbul Medipol University
+90 (444) 85 44
oceran@medipol.edu.tr
Orhan Hacıhasanoğlu -Dean, Professor (Architectural – PhD)
Özyeğin University
Faculty of Architecture and Design
+90 (216) 564 90 00
Orhan.hacihasanoglu@ozyegin.edu.tr
Tahsin Yomralıoğlu -Professor (Geomatics-Phd)
İstanbul Technical University
Faculty of Civil Engineering
CURRICULUM VITAE
/ PERSONAL INFORMATION, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCES
7. Family Modeling and Parametric object design (Rhino3D: Grasshopper)
8. Clash Detection (Naviswork)
9. Modeling according to LOD Levels
10.Sustainability and Environmental Design (IESVE, NumFEM and THERM)
11.BIM Building Services and Solutions
12.Logistics, Transportation and Manufacturing Process with BIM
13.Building Management Systems (Desigo)
14.Preparation of report and finalization of BIM project
•INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL MODELING TECHNIQUES IN BIM ENVIRONMENT
1. Introduction to Interior Architecture with BIM
2. BIM Concept: Application Project, LOD, CDE and BIM Terminology
3. Design Techniques by using Revit & Rhino3D
4. Furnishing Modeling by using Rhino3D
5. Linking Rhino3D objects to create Revit Families
6. Application of LOD Levels on Furnitures
7. Parameters & COBIe Assignment
8. Modeling Interior Space with LOD 200
9. Modeling Interior Space with LOD 300
10.Modeling Interior Space with LOD 400/500
11.Modeling Interior with BIMCloud and Add-ins (Blocks)
12.Identity Assignment and Standardization of Model Elements.
+90 (212) 285 38 18 tahsin@itu.edu.tr
13.Cost Analysis: Scheduling, Material Takeoff and nD Planning (Bexel Manager)
14.Preparation of report and finalization of BIM project
PROJECT #1: DESERT ROSE / PARAMETRIC & GENERATIVE SKILLS
PROJECT #2: SCHOOL OF ROCK / ENGINEERING SKILLS
Profile
Microsoft 365 Autodesk AutoCAD IESVE Virtual Environment Lumion Autodesk Revit McNeel Rhinoceros3D Adobe Master Collection Teaching Activity
Construc
SYLLABUS
CONTENT SUBJECTS
SITE ANALYSIS GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SUN PATH & WIND ROSE
FUNCTIONS
CONCEPT SKETCHES
DURING DAY & NIGHT
FORM FINDING
GALAPAGOS OPTIMIZATION FOR THE SHAPE
FORM FINDING
BEFORE & AFTER GALAPAGOS
Start optimizing shading Generating radiation analysis
view outside Top view
the
showing dense membrane
the left and lighter
the
Reducing
mesh where radiation is low to optimize the
of
element
on
on
right
FORMING STEPS [LADYBUG]
STRUCTURAL MODELING
DESIGNING STRUCTURE [LUNCHBOX]
FINALIZING STRUCTURE Start designing the structure Main outside truss structure Main inside truss structure Main inside beam connection Design Elastic net for seating Design intermediate truss structure Design structure for back face of the pavilion Design main beam in touch with the ground Start designing the shading structure Main beam structure Secondary elements for shading Final Structure Model
STRUCTURAL MODELLING
Start designing panels for outside surface Start designing panels for inside surface Generate panels for outside surface following internal structure division
PAVILION FORMATION
Generate panels for inside surface following internal structure division PANELLING SURFACE PANELLING [PANELINGTOOLS]
ELEMENTS Final Pavilion Shape ANALSIS EXTENSION & FINALIZING FORMATION Element directed towards first view Element directed towards second view Element directed towards third view Element protecting from sun Element protecting from wind
analysis
rest of pavilion
Extend
for
ACCESIBILITY
Main Road, Site Plan & Elevation
Structural Frame Made of Corten Tubular Steel, Diameter ranging from 42.5mm-48.34 mm and thickness ranging from 2mm-4mm.
Concrete Foundation, which is a fixed support, and helps in load transfer to the substructure.
Karamba Analysis with max deformation of 50mm, under the influence of self-weight of the structure and Live Loads.
STRUCTURE KARAMBA ANALYSIS
Structure of the Pavilion
MATERIALS Material Representation DETAILS SYSTEM DETAILS
PANELLING, SHADING, MEMBRANE AND STRUCTURE
INSTALLATION
SCALE
COMPARISON
HUMAN-SIZE
The building is a High School Education building located in Valparaíso, Chile. For this case-study the building´ s envelope respond to the National Thermal Regulation (OGUC 4..1.10)
Thermal Characteristics of the Building
Wall (Building’s wall) 3.0 W/M²k (2.46 W/M²k) Roof (Building’s roof)= 0.6 W/m²K (0.48 W/M²k) Window – Curtain Wall (Building´ s double glazing) 3.6 - 2.4 W/m²K (2.85 W/m²K) Basement Building basement Not regulated (2.77 W/m²K) • The average temperature is 13.0 °C. • The average annual maximum temperature is 17.6° C • The average annual minimum temperature is 8 4° C
With an average of 23 8 ° , July is the warmest month At 2 3 °C on average, January is the coldest month of the year • The average amount of annual precipitation is 1162 mm • The driest month is February. There is 61 mm of precipitation in February In October, the precipitation reaches its peak, with an average of 147 mm • The average annual percentage of humidity is 77.0% For this
the building is relocated in the city of Milan, where will face similar climate conditions and the local normative. Regarding to the climate, Milan is 133m above sea level In Milan, the climate is warm and temperate. The rainfall in Milan is significant, with precipitation even during the driest month The average temperature in Milan is 13.0 °C About 1162 mm of precipitation falls annually. Building, Location and Climate Relocation Weather Data Analysis Valparaíso is 15m above sea level The climate is warm and temperate The rain falls mostly in the winter, with relatively little rain in the summer The average temperature in Valparaíso is 13 6 °C About 345 mm of precipitation falls annually. With an average of 17° C, February is the warmest month The hottest day of the year is February 8, with an average high of 20°C and low of 12°C At 10.4° C on average, July is the coldest month of the year The coldest day of the year is July 27 with an average low of 7°C and high of 15°C. INTRODUCTION CASE STUDY PROBLEM DEFINITION
(OGUC 4.1.10)
•
case-study,
Once the building is being relocated in Milan, its envelope must be specified according to the Italian Climate Zone, which in our case is ZONE E.
For this reason, our first step was to set new materials for the new design conditions. The next table shows a comparison between the two thermal regulations, the original U values, and the optimized values of the envelope
Curtain Wall
The new curtain wall consider the Schüco USC 65 F Unitized System
Construction Frame with a double glazing from AGC. The glazing system is configured by 8 mm planible Clearvision pos.2, 16 mm Argon 90%, 6 mm Planibel Clearlite,, Stratobel 66 2 (6 mm Planibel G pos 5 + 0 76 mm PVB Clear +6 mm Planibel Clearlite)
Roof
Regarding the roof from the interior to the exterior is composed by 190
mm concrete slab + 120 mm Rockwool insulation + 45 mm cement
board + waterproof vapour membrane + weldable waterproofing + weldable bitumen + waterproofing
Opaque Wall
The opaque wall of the envelope it was configurated with 13 mm
gypsum board + a vapour barrier + 200 mm concrete block (heavyweight) filled with perlite + air infiltration barrier + 100 mm
Extruded polysterene foam (XPS) with acrilyc finish
Basement
The basement layer is structured by a 200 mm concrete slab + 100 mm
Extruded polystyrene foam (XPS) + 150 mm gravel.
After locating the Project in Milan and setting Milan conditions, our goal is by using less effective solutions to provide efficiency equal to the most efficient solution. At this point, we tried to understand which solution is not the most efficient so we can work on it and make it equal to the other most efficient solutions
By following this idea, we have worked in the radiation sector. At this point, we have realized that Radiation is not the biggest problem for Milan but it is still remarkable From this point we decided to work on it; how we can get benefit from radiation, and how we can solve the problems which cause by radiation Due to work on this section, we have set the energy efficiency parameters of our building first then worked on problem definitions re-engineering
These analysis made because of potential problems and opportunities seen by radiation energy
• Direct Normal Irradiation: This analysis done to understand do we need a shading system
• Global Horizontal Irradiation This analysis done to understand which kind of shading system we are going to use
• Photovoltaic Power Potential: This analysis was done to see how we can make equal solar energy efficiency to others
As a result;
• Since our South facade is clear, we decided to work on a shading system that will provide a comfort zone to the interior side. Due to work on the shading system, we re-engineered the current shadings by working on daylight analysis and radiation analysis.
• Since there is remarkable solar energy can be provided according to photovoltaic power potential analysis, we decided to work on solar energy systems as well Yet as it is seen from the analysis, we decided to work on new tech systems which can provide much more efficiency than other kinds of solar energy systems
PROBLEM DEFINITION (RADIATION)
Building Envelope Systems Uvalue target Uvalue Case Study Uvalue optimizad ed Uvalue reduction Wall 0.26 [W/m²K ] 3.0 W/M²k (2.46 W/M²k) 0.23 [W/m²K] 90% Roof 0.23 [W/m²K ] 0.6 W/m²K (0.48 W/M²k) 0.23 [W/m²K] 52% Basement 0.28 [W/m²K ] Not regulated (2.77 W/m²K) 0.25 [W/m²K] 90% Windows 1.30 [W/m²K ] 1.5 _2 W/m²K (2.85 W/m²K) 1.00 [W/m²K] 50%
INTRODUCTION
AND THE PATH
ANALYSIS
Building Energy Efficiency Parameters Area of building envelope 204 m² Ratio surface envelope/volume 1.17 m²/m³ �������������������� 0.20 W/m²K Transmission heat losses 26.6 kW h/a Ventilation heat losses 0.23 kW h/a Internal heat gains 0.28 kW h/a Solar heat gains 1.60 kW h/a DIIRECT NORMAL IRRADIATION GLOBAL HORIZONTAL IRRADIATION PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER POTENTIAL
DAYLIGHT RE-ENGINEERING (PROBLEM SOLUTION) SOLAR RE-ENGINEERING (ENERGY EFFICIENCY)
PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION & ENVELOPE OPTIMIZATION Italian Climate Zone DPR 412/93 Envelope Optimization
INTRODUCTION
DAYLIGHT ANALYSIS
SHADING CALCULATIONS
The Typology of the building is to optimize the indoor building performance regarding the user’s functions where it allows natural sunlight to enter the offices labs and corridors without overheating and creating uncomfortable environment.
We analyzed the daylight analysis for the indoor spaces using Insight daylight that allowed us to study the performance and identify the critical areas of the of the building.
In the Southern façade we notice high Illumination and lower near the end side of the classed room than the required value.
In library we have the standard lux values for natural lighting during the day.
In the Corridors the lux values varies from each area the requires to have artificial and natural lighting.
In service rooms where we have low luminosity the is the required to use artificial light to balance the lux needed for the space use.
The study reveals the entrance area where we have unbalance distribution of the illumination, where we have higher at the foyer and low luminosity this required to use artificial light to balance the lux needed for the space use.
Calculation Summary and Result
Inputs
By applying three main data: EPW File Context: Façade and Shading Configuration
Standard Calculations
By using standard calculations the horizontal shading depth can be found
The Following shows the shading’s calculations set by the standards during the summer season.
Knowing that the latitude corresponding to the study case, the site in Milan latitude.
The length P of the horizontal shading can then be found with the following formula:
W Height of the glass, considering the section between louvers ��=0.6 ����)
O : Distance between the window and the shading device (��=0.2 ����)
Effectiveness
Calculating the Ɛ effectiveness, to solve the reduction of the transmitted heat due to the presence of the shading system Where Ɛ effectiveness should be <030
We see the shading device performance coefficient in the critical season (summer) is lower than 0 3 which
Therefore, the
of the
Daylight analysis Third Floor Daylight analysis Second Floor Daylight analysis First Floor
Area Illumination (lux) Office Space 500 Conference Rooms 300 Internal Corridors 200 Laboratory (Classroom) 750 Services 300
GSA Lighting Standard
The value is ��=45.46° �������������� =sin (cos�� cos(2345)cos 0 + sin(�� sin 2345 ]=6799° �������������� =sin 1[ cos��)cos 2345)cos 0 + sin ��)sin( 2345 ]=2109°
corresponds to the Italian code constrains
effectiveness
designed shading device
verified �� = ��+�� Tan αSummer) = 0.323
is
Month ���� ��=28.29° June 0.680 July 0.670 August 0.710 September 0.784 Average 0.711 For the South façade: ���� =���� �� �� min ���� �� ���� �� �� = 0711 Month ���� (��=32.86°) June 0.915 July 0.890 August 0.913 September 0.850 Average 0.892 For the East and West façade: ���� �� ��=���� min ���� �� ; ���� = 0892 South Facade Ɛ = 0.048 East Facade Ɛ = 0.051 West Facade Ɛw = 0.051 Corridor's analysis Library area analysis Cafeteria Area analysis
DAYLIGHT ANALYSIS FOR EACH FLOOR
SHADING DIMENSION CALCULATIONS
SHADING SOLUTIONS
ACTUAL SECTION ACTUAL STRATIGRAPHY SOLUTION OFFERS GLASS AND Shading not verified SHADING FEATURES Installation option None Wind Stability None Louver blade Angle None Properties None Ease of Cleaning None Light Control None Energy Efficiency None Rainwater control None Glass Features 1.Bad Thermal transmittance of glass Glass not Verified 2. Lack of Shading Shading not verified Glass Features SHADING FEATURES Installation option Vertical Wind Stability Unaffected by wind Louver blade Angle Fixed Properties Sun shading Ease of Cleaning OO Light Control Partial control Energy Efficiency OO Rainwater control OO Glass Features SHADING FEATURES Installation option Horizontal Wind Stability Unaffected by wind Louver blade Angle Fixed Properties Sun shading, heat protection Ease of Cleaning O Light Control Full control Energy Efficiency OOOO Rainwater control O Glass Features SHADING FEATURES Installation option Horizontal Wind Stability Unaffected by wind Louver blade Angle Fixed Properties Sun shading, heat protection Ease of Cleaning OOO Light Control Full control Energy Efficiency OOOO Rainwater control OOO 1.Good Thermal transmittance of glass Glass Verified 2. Partial light control Shading not verified 1.Good Thermal transmittance of glass Glass Verified 2Poor rainwater control Shading not verified 1.Good Thermal transmittance of glass Glass Verified 2. Good properties and rainwater control Shading verified Working Principles Angle Analyzes and Solutions Reactions Overhang Shading Louvers
Floor Concrete Slab
Summer Solar Angle 21st of January Winter Solar Angle 21st of December Summer Solar Gain Reduction %75 In Summer; • Keeps from summer sun • Controls the light • Prevents walls to act like thermal batt In Winter; • Allows to sun in • Provides insulation for the glass • Acts as a windbreaker Allows Ventilation between Fabric and Shading Highest Angle Lowest Angle Concept
decision is related to solar analysis After analysis the solar angles of Milano in winter and summer peak periods it is clearly seen that there is a great difference between these angles In order to face with this kind of annual solar angle, Overhang Shadings are offered It is a crucial element in passive solar design because it blocks the sun’s heat energy when it is not desired Since the sun travels different paths across the sky in the winter (low) and summer (high) time, an overhang can be constructed to utilize and manipulate the heat energy from the sun
Raised
Mullion
Shading
SOLUTION CONCEPT OFFERS
HOW DOES IT WORK?
CONCEPT
With the Actual Case, are able to see the higher daylight Intensity in the building with value 2x higher than the standard
As well we notice the higher visibility to the interior around 6% as an average correspond to higher constant solar access during the day.
Italy is located in the sunny Mediterranean region in the south of Europe, which is rich in solar energy resources and has great potential for development and utilization, and the cost of solar photovoltaic power generation is relatively low compared to the mid-western region of Europe
We analyzed Fixed shading with 45 Degrees Slope we see higher reduction of the illumination intensity as we selected aluminum horizontal shading at has higher absorption and zero transmission which corelate to lower visibility during the day with average daylight within the standard requirements.
MILANO, LINATE
Latitude 45.4642° N
Longitude: 9 1900° E
We have changed the Fixed shading with 10 Degrees Slope we see higher illumination compared to the pervious case. we obtain higher visibility to the external environment and daylight average within the standard requirements.
In addition, Italy is a relatively energy-poor country, most of the energy depends on imports from abroad According to data, Italy's domestic oil and gas production can only meet 4 5% and 22% of the domestic market demand, respectively, while nuclear power generation was rejected by a referendum.
As a result, about 85% of energy imports make Italy's power generation costs remain high The pressure of the energy crisis and the need for a lowcarbon economy have led Italy to look to the clean energy sector, represented by solar energy
As a result of the radiation analysis, solar energy production may highly increase energy performance of the building
MILANO, LINATE
Latitude 45 4642° N
Longitude 9.1900° E Area 181.8 km²
Elevation: 120 m
1400-2200h of sunshine throughout the year in Milan, Italy
The total amount of solar radiation received in a year is approximately 1257 KWh/m2
Concept II Actual Concept I
Inclination Decision of Shading according to Daylight Results ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
120 m
Area 181 8 km² Elevation
Location: Milan, Italy Surface Area: 1671 m² Analysis time: 01.01.2020 – 31.12.2020 Annual cumulative radiation: 2 190 003 kW Average for square meter: 1257 kW Probable PV energy production: 341106 kW/ year Solar Energy (kWh/m²
OVERALL SOLAR ANALYSIS
RESULTS COMPARISON OF INCLINATION OPTIONS SOLAR ANALYSIS
SOLAR SOLUTION
ACTUAL SECTION SOLUTION OFFERS SOLAR SOLUTION NOT AVAILABE Fixed silicon PV panels Silicon PV panels with tracking system Concentrating solar panels with tracking system Solar sphere with tracking system Sunny, cloudy, windy Sunny, cloudy Sunny cloudy Sunny, cloudy, windy Evening Si 100% ~180W/m2 70% ~180W/m2 Si Si 30% ~180W/m2 Si 25% ~180W/m2 FEATURES Mounting method Flat installation Maintenance HIGH Energy efficiency 10%~12% FEATURES Mounting method Installation facing due south Maintenance LOW Energy efficiency 18% FEATURES Mounting method Installation facing due south Maintenance Medium nergy efficiency 25% FEATURES Mounting method No requirement Maintenance Medium Energy efficiency 30%~35% 1. With solar tracking system 2. Low energy conversion rate 3. Low electricity production 1.With solar tracking system 2.Good energy conversion rate 3.Slightly higher construction costs 1. With solar tracking system 2. Good energy conversion rate 3. Good electricity production 1.Low energy conversion rate 2. High maintenance cost afterwards CALCULATIONS CONCEPT 1 CONCEPT 2
Calculate the total solar module panel area Total roof area 1630 m2 Occupied area per solar panel module: 3m Number of solar modules: 543 Single panel assembly area:2056mm*1140mm The total solar module panel area =543*2.34=1273m2 2 Calculation of power generation Ep=HA ×S×K1 × K2 HA Total annual solar irradiation per unit area(unit: KW/m2) S Total solar module area K1 Component conversion efficiency factor K2 Integrated system efficiency factor HA = 1257 KW/m2 S= 1273m2 K1=0.25 K2=0.8; Ep=320 032KW
Calculate the total installed capacity Total roof area: 1630 m2 Occupied area per solar panel module: 4m2 Number of solar modules: 400 Beta.ray 1.8( 180cm): Daily theoretical generation of energy: 3.4KWh Total installed capacity=400*3.4*365=496.400KW 2 Calculation of power generation Ep= Total installed capacity × K(Integrated efficiency factor) K: The integrated system efficiency factor is the value after taking into account the component inhomogeneity, inverter losses, AC/DC circuit losses, etc., and is generally taken as 0.8 Ep=496400*0.8=397 120KW
1
1
SOLAR SOLUTION
FOR EACH CONCEPT
COMPARISON CALCULATIONS CALCULATIONS
SOLUTION DETAILS
Design Solutions
Choosing a solar sphere logical not only for efficiency but also for design parameters While solar spheres are providing %99 transparency, pv panels are blocking the vision and the view
With this advantages solar spheres prove that solar system can be also used as a part of design By the approach it can be integrated to fundementals of building design
Concept
To explain how it Works better same solutions explained by differend kind usage
The Spherical sun power generator
•Spherical solar power generator can work on both diffused or direct rays the sun
Feasibility Solutions
Offering a solutions is not only related to efficiency, and design aspects. More important than these parameteres there is a feasibility which allows or denies to apply the solution. About this issue, solar spheres has remarkable advantages rather than other solutions. Firstly, solar spheres does not restricted by solar angles like panels affected It can gather energy from everywhere from where light source or fake source Moreover application of solar system is modular and can be applied to any kind of Project Solar spheres not only related to roof only it can be used in landscape design, facade solutions and etc due to its advantages
Before applying this solution, we need to understand that it where it can be much more better Chart below is explaining where it is much more efficient than other areas
•Diffused rays of the sun are directed towards ball lens
•Ball lens will focus the diffused ray onto a collector plate
•This collector plate is small but as powerful as a larger PV panel
•Collected energy will be converted into electricity using that smaller panel and will be directed towards the battery
•The spherical sun power generator has a dual axis tracking system with a micro tracking system,
•both the spherical solar power generator and tracking system are immune to weather
•It will absorb a very little damage in the windy season
•Collected energy in the battery can be used in electric cars or any solar driven appliance
•Spherical sun power generator can easily supply its energy to the power grid in the future
•Heat is the additional benefit of the spherical solar power generator Future
The spherical solar power generator is aiming to charge electric cars and fully mobile
SOLUTION STRATIGRAPHY MORE DETAILS ABOUT OUR SOLUTION Sunny, cloudy, windy, Evening 25% ~180W/m2 Si FEATURES Mounting method No requirement Maintenance Medium Energy efficiency 30%~35% Solar Sphere Detailed
HOW DOES IT WORK Day and Night Functions Night Time More Efficiency than PV Panels %35 In Day Time; • Collects light from each main and subsources • Prevents Visual Pollution • Eliminates reflectivity which can cause accidents In Night Time; • Collect light from around (ex.Street lights,reflections) •
unobtrusive clear view •
a solar light
reflections insde Day Time Highest Angle Lowest Angle
can
Provides
Acts as
source with
SOLUTION STRATIGRAPHY AND DETAILS CEONCEPT HOW DOES IT WORK?
C) CONCEPT 2 C) CONCEPT 2 RESULTS APPLICATION RESULTS A) BEFORE A) BEFORE B) CONCEPT 1 B) CONCEPT 1 Annual electricity saving: 320,032kW of electricity Annual electricity saving: 397,120 kW of electricity CO2 reduction: 319,072 kg CO2 reduction 395,928 kg Coal saving 128013 kg Dust reduction 87,049 kg Dust reduction: 108,017kg Coal saving 158,848 kg 319,072 kg 128,013 kg 87,049 kg 395,928 kg 158,848 kg 108,017 kg Savings in electricity costs： 73,607 € Savings in electricity costs： 91,337€ Initial Cost Initial Cost Ahmet OKUTAN MSc. Architect & Engineer
