Skip to main content

LMD July 2023

Page 1

Riding Herd Saying things that need to be said. July 15, 2023 • www.aaalivestock.com

Volume 65 • No. 7

Coming Undone LEE PITTS

I

t’s been a love affair ever since they joined hands in 1986 to save the spotted owl. That means they’ve been hitched for 36 years now and seldom have we seen them disagree in public. They were the perfect pair and where one went the other followed. But now the bond between the over 50,000 animal rights groups and environmental organizations in America is being tested like never before and before you know it they’ll be seeing a marriage counselor and seeking a trial separation because, let’s face it, their issues and differences are just too big to overcome. Once upon a time wherever the eco-warriors went into battle the folks who refer to cats, dogs and cows as “non-human animals” always had their backs. It seems like they’ve always been joined at the hip, probably because as flaming liberals they have so much in common. Until now when one green group needed help lobbying a bill through Congress they knew they could count on support from the animal rightists. But now there seems to be visible signs of discord between the greens and the animal activists which is probably good news for stockmen. Divide and conquer and all that.

Crispy Critters

NEWSPAPER PRIORITY HANDLING

One wonders, why did it take record setting forest fires for the animal rightists to wake up and smell the smoke? During

a recent four-year period it’s estimated that 539 separate wildfires killed nearly 3 million animals and a funny thing about infernos is that fire doesn’t play favorites. It kills all animals. It wasn’t just the creatures the animal activists love to hate, like cows and sheep. (The animal activists supposedly love all animals... just not our animals.) Yet we wonder, where were the protestors, the PETA Hollywood starlets covering their privates

cooked w-a-a-ay past well-done, that would have been okay with the animal rightists who don’t seem to categorize cows as “animals.” But if you walk the ground after a forest fire has incinerated everything in its path you’ll see the skeletons of all sorts of crispy critters like cremated cottontails, carbonized deer and all sorts of endangered species consumed by combustion. And because these fires were largely the result of policies written by their buddies, the environmentalists, and a few brave animal rightists had the nerve to suggest that, hey, maybe what’s best for the greens isn’t necessarily good for the animal lovers. If the first signs of division between the greenies and the animal lovers were the forest fires, it was the hunting done by the greens that really made the animal activists madder than a

Don’t judge folks by their relatives.

with lettuce leaves, protesting against the loss of animal lives due to senseless wildfires that burned brightly due to government mismanagement? If it was just cows that were

livestock-truck-bombing Animal Liberation Front member. Yes, it turns out that greenies can, and do, support hunting in cases when it’s considered to be ecologically beneficial. While on the opposite side of the argument are animal ethicists who argue that we have a moral obligation to take ALL steps necessary to avoid ALL suffering of animals. Naturally, your average animal rightist would never condone hunting of any kind. So when environmentalists supported the murder of cows by government gunslingers that rubbed the animal lovers the wrong way, even if the dead were just cows.

Target Practice The Center for Biological Diversity has been a thorn in rancher’s side for decades as they are one of the greenest groups there is. What is new is that they have now become a pain in the patoot of the USDA, or the Animal Plant Inspection Service (APHIS) to be more continued on page 2

Green Madness The Downside You’d Have To Burn a Pizza Stove 849 Years of Wild and to Equal 1 Year of John Kerry’s Private Jet Science River Act Designation nvironmental bureaucrats are out to BY MARC MORANO / NEW YORK POST OPINION

Impact on Property Owners, Water Rights, and Agricultural Communities BY DREW LESOFSKI, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HERITAGE WATERS COALITION

W

ild and Science River Act (Wild and Science) designation is a process that legally secures specific areas, primarily to protect their unique ecosystems and biodiversity. While the intention is generally noble, these designations can inadvertently pose a host of negative implications, particularly for private property owners, water rights holders, and the farming and ranching communities. Private property owners are often significantly affected by Wild and Science designations. Although these designations do not directly annex privately owned land, they can devalue such properties due to the restrictions and regulations imposed on surrounding areas. For instance, activities such as construction, road building, and usage of motorized vehicles could be limited, thus impacting the overall convenience and accessibility of these properties. Furthermore, property owners may be subjected to stricter regulations about how they can use their land to prevent potential damage to the adjacent Wild and Science designated areas. Water rights are another contentious issue associated with Wild and Science designation. continued on page 4

E

save you from pizza. The city government is set to restrict emissions from coal- and wood-fired pizza ovens in restaurants in the city. New Yorkers are once again suffering at the hands of the unelected food police in the name of public health and climate change. New Yorkers have already endured former Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s attempts to ban soda sales of over 16 ounces for their own good and are facing Governor Kathy Hochul’s gas stove and furnace bans in the state, all in the name of climate change. And now, another one bites the crust as New York City officials are going after pizzerias using the century-old cooking methods, citing the ovens’ allegedly excessive carbon emissions. But how many pizzas would you have to order to equal just one trip on John Kerry’s private jet? In 2021, Kerry’s private jet emitted an estimated 116 metric tons of carbon in less than a year. Private jets emit up to 40 times as much CO2 per passenger as commercial flights. It would take a coal-burning stove 849 years to reach the carbon emissions of John Kerry’s jet in one year. By comparison, the carbon footprint of a wood-burning stove (a reasonable facsimile of a pizza oven) is barely measurable. The 8 Billion Trees Project estimates that the “carbon footprint of wood-burning stoves” can be up to 15.6 grams an hour or 374 grams a day. This is meacontinued on page 4

by LEE PITTS

No Chit Chat

M

y friend Rod gets all his news by reading the headlines on a website called Market Watch because he refuses to pay a dollar per week to read the complete stories. But this only partially explains his stupidity. “What’s all this excitement about AI?” he asked. “I read where one company’s stock went up 700% because it’s a leader in AI. And every other headline was about how AI is the next EXCITING BIG THING. Heck, we’ve been AI’ing cows for decades now and Wall Street just found out? And just ask any brown-shouldered AI technician how ‘exciting’ it is.” Admittedly, Rod’s not all that computer savvy. He thinks a byte is what rattlesnakes and cantankerous old horses do. His chips are ruffled with ridges and he thinks software refers to the plastic knives, forks and spoons they pass out at bull-sale-barbecues. Cookies are what you get for dessert. “Rod,” I said, “if you weren’t so cheap and could read the complete stories you’d know that the AI they’re referring to is artificial intelligence, not artificial insemination.” Obviously, Rod hasn’t had too many run-ins with intelligence, real or artificial, and I’m beginning to wonder about myself. Not too long after the encounter with Rod I was reading a story in the New Mexico Stockman magazine about stress in cows caused by cold weather. It was a ho-hum story and not up to the usual excellent standards of the magazine. And then I read the fine print and you can imagine my surprise when I read that the sample article was written BY A COMPUTER! Well, my friends, I’ve seen the future and it doesn’t include me. I blame something called ChatGPT that will write a story all by itself without any human intervention. Now you can add ‘writer’ to the list of jobs destroyed by the Internet. If you see me on the side of the road with a sign that says “Will work for food,” throw me a quarter or two. Actually the nerds and geeks say ChatGPT doesn’t write the stories, it generates them. So I’m a ‘generator’ now. Or a ‘linguistic engineer,’ as one out-of-work

continued on page 3


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
LMD July 2023 by Livestock Publishers - Issuu