Livestock “The greatest homage we can pay to truth is to use it.”
MARKET
Digest I
APRIL 15, 2012 • www. aaalivestock . com
Volume 54 • No. 4
Whose Country Is This? by Lee Pitts
NEWSPAPER PRIORITY HANDLING
T
by LEE PITTS
Or So I Hear
– JAMES RUSSELL LOWELL
here’s just something particularly galling about a secretive international tribunal telling a country, any country, what it can and cannot do. That’s especially true when a controversial trade organization tells us that we cannot inform the American consumer where her food came from. According to every survey we’ve seen the vast majority of American consumers want labels on their food informing them of its origin. Some survey indicated that as many as 90 percent of American consumers want such country of origin (COOL) labels. Additionally, every survey we’ve ever seen indicates that the vast majority American ranchers also want the beef they raise to be labeled as being produced in the good old U.S. of A. So when American grocers finally began putting COOL labels on cuts of beef, lamb, chicken, pork, and hamburger it seems everyone got what they wanted. Everyone that is except the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, the beef packer’s lobby, the National Pork Producers and an organization that most Americans know little about, the World Trade Organization. Unfortunately for the ranchers and consumers it is this latter group, the WTO, who will decide
Riding Herd
“When in doubt, let your horse do the thinking.” whether or not American consumers and ranchers will get their wish to have the meat they produce and consume labeled as to country of origin. How and why we in America ever gave an organization located in Geneva, Switzerland, the right to tell us what we can and cannot do is a dirty little secret being kept by supposedly patriotic American politicians, lobbyists and multinational Americanbased corporations who don’t
want you to know any more about them than they do the food you eat.
I Pledge Allegiance To The WTO Opponents of country-of-origin-labeling say it is nothing more than a protectionist trade measure that we are using to discourage imports. And these critics might have a point if all the food in the world was the same and was produced under the
same rigid health and environmental standards. But clearly it is not. As proof we offer up milk from China that was contaminated with melamine, European and Canadian mad cows, four legged Mexican TB carriers and South American bovines with Foot and Mouth disease. We’d like to point out amidst all the brouhaha that country of origin labeling does not stop one single animal from entering this country, nor does it prevent any country from selling us beef. Of these facts there can be no debate. What COOL does do is give the American consumer the ability to find out where the food she feeds her family came from. The decision on whether or not to buy foreign or domestic beef lies solely with her, not some bureaucrats at a meeting in Cancun. That’s why we were devastated after years of watching COOL work its way through the bureaucratic and political morass continued on page two
National Forest document stirs scandal with road removal plans by RON ARNOLD, Washington Times
hen Wayne Allard saw the new U.S. Forest Service guidebook for managing off-highway vehicle trails, he was astounded. As the American Motorcyclist Association’s lobbyist, he seethed over its derogatory and unfitting remarks, like “Managing trails for OHVs (off-highway vehicles) can be a lot like herding dragons.” And as a former U.S. senator from Colorado, he saw political danger in the report’s lame OHV humor — “They’re big, they can cause a lot of damage, and they sure can heat things up.” The 316-page document with the unwieldy title — “A Comprehensive Framework for Off-Highway Vehicle Trail Management” — concluded with a similarly flip comment by author Kevin G. Meyer, a National Park Service trail specialist: this document, he wrote, had been developed “to help trail managers corral the OHV management dragon,” and “to help keep the beast at bay. Happy herding and happy trails!” These jolly insults from an agency employee annoyed AMA’s Allard, but substantive problems in the Framework were truly chilling
W
to the OHV community and stirred a scandal. The Forest Service pulled the document from its website, with no explanation of why, or of what will happen to it. Two weeks ago, in a letter to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack — whose department oversees the Forest Service — Allard and six OHV colleagues complained bitterly about the scandal, saying that the document’s author inexplicably adopts the entire environmental analysis of a radical Montana group called Wildlands CPR. On its website, Wildlands CPR brags of its clout: “As a result of our on-going efforts . . . the Forest Service has removed 7,890 miles of roads and motorized trails.” In the 1990s, a substantial anti-road movement emerged in America. A 1994 “Road Ripping Conference” in California spawned a network of small outfits. A little investigating revealed that the Wildlands group of today’s brouhaha was incorporated in Montana on August 5, 1996 — as the Wildlands Center for Preventing Roads.
am one of the 10 percent of adult Americans who don’t own a cell phone. It’s not that I think cell phones are the work of the devil, or that they aren’t handy, it’s just that I am far too busy listening to other people’s conversations to have one of my own. I am not a people watcher but I am a member of the same genus and species: I am a people listener. A conversation pirate. A thief of other people’s words. I don’t know if I was born an enormous eavesdropper, or if I became an earjacker, a highjacker of other people’s dialogue, when I became a writer and was always in need of fresh material. I am sure of one thing though, I find other people’s conversations infinitely more interesting than my own. Although I don’t own one, cell phones have been a blessing to me and have extended my writing career 20 years longer than it should have been. I don’t do my research in a library but in a restaurant booth where I can hardly write fast enough to record all the cell yells from people on their phones. You all know who I’m talking about, the folks who invite other people to lunch and then spend the entire time talking to someone else on their phone; talking louder and louder above the din of other cell phone addicts. They seem to be completely oblivious to their lunch guests, or the other diners. Talk about obscene phone calls! I know it’s rude for me to listen in on other people’s conversations but the way I see it, if they want to blab at such decibels then I have a responsibility to listen. I should at least show them that courtesy. You’d be surprised at the things I’ve heard. (Or maybe you wouldn’t.) There have been many occasions when I could have blackmailed husbands, embarrassed wives or tattled on kids with the information I overheard. And evidently I’m not the only person who listens in on other people’s continued on page seven
continued on page sixteen
www.LeePittsbooks.com