The invention of time and space origins definitions nature properties 1st edition patrice f. dassonv

Page 1


1st Edition Patrice F. Dassonville

Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://textbookfull.com/product/the-invention-of-time-and-space-origins-definitions-na ture-properties-1st-edition-patrice-f-dassonville/

More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...

Time of Nature and the Nature of Time Philosophical Perspectives of Time in Natural Sciences 1st Edition Christophe Bouton

https://textbookfull.com/product/time-of-nature-and-the-natureof-time-philosophical-perspectives-of-time-in-naturalsciences-1st-edition-christophe-bouton/

Social Ecology Society Nature Relations across Time and Space 1st Edition Helmut Haberl

https://textbookfull.com/product/social-ecology-society-naturerelations-across-time-and-space-1st-edition-helmut-haberl/

The Primate Origins of Human Nature Carel P. Van Schaik

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-primate-origins-of-humannature-carel-p-van-schaik/

The origins of fairness : how evolution explains our moral nature 1st Edition Baumard

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-origins-of-fairness-howevolution-explains-our-moral-nature-1st-edition-baumard/

Space Time and the Limits of Human Understanding 1st Edition Shyam Wuppuluri

https://textbookfull.com/product/space-time-and-the-limits-ofhuman-understanding-1st-edition-shyam-wuppuluri/

Nature through Time Virtual field trips through the Nature of the past Edoardo Martinetto

https://textbookfull.com/product/nature-through-time-virtualfield-trips-through-the-nature-of-the-past-edoardo-martinetto/

Techno Fixers Origins And Implications Of Technological Faith Sean F. Johnston

https://textbookfull.com/product/techno-fixers-origins-andimplications-of-technological-faith-sean-f-johnston/

The inseparable nature of love and aggression clinical and theoretical perspectives 1st Edition Otto F. Kernberg

https://textbookfull.com/product/the-inseparable-nature-of-loveand-aggression-clinical-and-theoretical-perspectives-1st-editionotto-f-kernberg/

Translation across Time and Space 1st Edition Wafa Abu Hatab

https://textbookfull.com/product/translation-across-time-andspace-1st-edition-wafa-abu-hatab/

The Invention of Time and Space

Origins, Definitions, Nature, Properties

TheInventionofTimeandSpace

TheInventionofTime andSpace

Origins,Definitions,Nature,Properties

Cannes France

ISBN978-3-319-46039-0ISBN978-3-319-46040-6(eBook) DOI10.1007/978-3-319-46040-6

LibraryofCongressControlNumber:2016951704

© SpringerInternationalPublishingSwitzerland2017

Thisworkissubjecttocopyright.AllrightsarereservedbythePublisher,whetherthewholeorpart ofthematerialisconcerned,specificallytherightsoftranslation,reprinting,reuseofillustrations, recitation,broadcasting,reproductiononmicrofilmsorinanyotherphysicalway,andtransmission orinformationstorageandretrieval,electronicadaptation,computersoftware,orbysimilarordissimilar methodologynowknownorhereafterdeveloped.

Theuseofgeneraldescriptivenames,registerednames,trademarks,servicemarks,etc.inthis publicationdoesnotimply,evenintheabsenceofaspecificstatement,thatsuchnamesareexemptfrom therelevantprotectivelawsandregulationsandthereforefreeforgeneraluse.

Thepublisher,theauthorsandtheeditorsaresafetoassumethattheadviceandinformationinthis bookarebelievedtobetrueandaccurateatthedateofpublication.Neitherthepublishernorthe authorsortheeditorsgiveawarranty,expressorimplied,withrespecttothematerialcontainedhereinor foranyerrorsoromissionsthatmayhavebeenmade.

Printedonacid-freepaper

ThisSpringerimprintispublishedbySpringerNature TheregisteredcompanyisSpringerInternationalPublishingAG Theregisteredcompanyaddressis:Gewerbestrasse11,6330Cham,Switzerland

Foreword

WhatPatriceDassonvilleproposesinthisbookisanexhilaratingridethroughour changingnotionsofspaceandtimesincehumanthoughtswere firstrecorded,with anin-depthmasteryoftherelatedhistorical,philosophical,scienti fic,andtechnical aspects.Viewedasawhole,thisfascinatingandintriguingdiscussionthrowslight onbothgeneralissuesanddetailedquestions,andinanutshellshowsthattimeand spacedonotexistbythemselves,butareinsteadpurelyintellectualconstructionsof humankind,builtupthroughalengthyprocessextendingroughlyoverthelast5000 yearsofhumanhistory.

The firstfourchaptersprovideintroductorymaterialoutliningthemaindifficultiesinvolvedinatrueandgenuinedefinitionoftheconceptoftimeand/or duration.(Asamatteroffact,exactlythesameproblemoccurswithspaceand/or distance).Alsodiscussedaretheso-calledarrowoftimeandancillaryissuessuch assynchronicityandtemporality.

Chapter 1 isanintroductionpresentingthebasicaimsandobjectivesofthebook anddiscussingthecontents.Itoutlinesthedifferencebetweenadiscoverywhich relatestoaphenomenon(ortoreality),andaninventionwhichisconnectedtoa concept.

Chapter 2 concentratesonthemainissuesofthediscussion,byintroducingthe useofdialectics.Itemphasizesthelackofdefinitions,andalsotheunknownnature oftimeandspaceandtheirunidentifiedproperties.

Chapter 3 digsdeeperintotheseissues,whicharerelatedtothefailureof dialectics.Itoutlinestheconfusionbetweentimeandevent,anddescribesthe semanticdisorderconcerningthedurationoftheongoing(orpresent)time, countlessmetaphors,aphorisms,sophisms,truisms,andsoforth,includingartifacts (i.e.,conceptionsbasedonanidea,suchasaclockoraclepsydra,usedtoevaluate thedurationbetweentwoevents).

Chapter 4 isthendevotedtotheuseofmodels(mathematicaltools)inorderto describerealitywiththehelpoftheconceptsoftimeandspace,forinstance, enablingonetopredicteventssuchasastronomicaloccurrences.Evidently,because mathematicalmodelingissimplyaninventionofhumanintelligence,itcarries

artifactsandapproximationstothestudiedreality.Physicallawsareobtained accordinglybymathematicalmodelsappliedtotheobservationofnature.Onthe philosophicalside,theselawsevolveovertime(orthroughhistory) theyare relative(andnotabsolute),andcanbemodi fiedlateron,dependingonnew observationsornewmodelsofnature.

Thechapterendswithaclassicexampledrawnfromsmalldeviationsto Kepler ’s fi rstlawdescribingthemovementoftheeartharoundthesunasan ellipticalorbit.Duetothepresenceofthemoon,itisnolongeratwo-bodyproblem, andthetrajectoryismodifiedtoasinusoidalconvergingspiralellipse.

Itisworthnoting,theverylargenumberofreferencestoGreek,Roman,and modernWesternphilosophersinthesefourintroductorychapters.Theseprovide complementarypointsofviewonthecentralissuesrelatingtotimeandspace.

Chapter 5 describeshistoricalperspectivesoftheoriginoftimethroughhistory withthehelpoficonographicsourcestakenfromvariousancientcivilisations, includingtheMaya,AncientEgypt,AncientChina,theRomanempire,Africanand easternEuropeanpeopleandtribes,andsoon.Itoutlinestheobviousevidenceof timeanddurationderivedfromthealternationofdayandnight,cycliceventsdueto seasons,andthelunarmonthormonthlycyclesofthemoon.Thisanthropological approachintroducesthedivisionofthedayintohours(12hforhalfaday,anumber thatcanbedividedby2,3,4,and6),minutes,andultimatelyseconds(with60min in1hand60sin1min,againanumberthatcanbedividedby2,3,and4,butalso 5,6,and10).Thisconstitutesaconvenientarrangementfordividingandorganizing everydaylife.

Inthesecondpartofhisbook,theauthorinvestigatesmoredetailedideasfor describingthenatureoftimeandspace,toexplaintemporalityandspatiality. Chapter 6 focusesonthedefinitionandnatureoftime.Thesecondwasoriginally obtainedfromanethnocentricandanthropo-centricviewoftherotationoftheearth, sinceitisdefi nedas1/240thofadegree.Amoretechnicaldefinitionwas finally giveninthe1960s,exploitingtheoscillationsofatomictransitionsincesium (atomicclocks),butitstillrelatestotheoriginaldefinition,andthisimpliesregular adjustmentofthereferencetimebecausetherotationofearthisslowingdown slightlyastimegoesby(duringrotationcycles).Thisisduetofrictionwithinthe atmosphere,whichinturnisresponsibleformanymeteorologicaleffectssuchas thetradewindsandtropicalhurricanes,becauseoftheCoriolisforce.

Thenon-phenomenologyoftimeisaccordinglywellestablished.Timeproceeds asareferencevariableinphysics,alwaysinthedenominatoroftotalorpartial derivatives.Thisinturnindicatesthatthephysicalvariableunderstudy(i.e.,distance,temperature,pressure,density,electriccharge,energy,oranyotherphysical quantity)issimplyderivedversustime(ordurationbetweentwoevents).The absolutedefinitionoftimeisconsequentlynotsatisfactory,asclearlyoutlinedand demonstratedbytheauthor,becauseitisreferredtothedelaysbetweentwoevents, whicharecomparedtotheearthrotationphenomenon.Radioisotopedatingtechniques,suchasthosedevelopedbyWillardF.Libby,basedonthehalf-lifeofthe C14 isotope,orthermoluminescencedecay,canbeusedtodatepost-mortem organicremainsoroldpottery.Dendrochronologycanalsobeusedfordating,

studyingthealternatingclearanddarkringsinthecrosssectionofatreetrunk. Asstressedbytheauthor,thesearesimpleartifactsrelatedtothealternationofthe seasons,andarenotlinkedtotime,whichstillremainsundefined.

PatriceDassonvillethenputsforwardageneraldefinitionoftime,as “aconcept correspondingtowhatseparatestwostatesofasystem”.Hethenexaminesthe etiologyofaging,distinguishingbetweenbiologicalandchronologicalage.The physicalinexistenceoftimeislinkedtothefactthattimehasnosource.Theauthor thenendsthechapterwithsomeexamplestakenfromdifferentareasoftheoretical physics,suchasgeneralrelativityandquantumphysics,toshowhowtimeis difficulttomanipulate,anddifficulttodefi nerigorously.

Thefollowingfourchaptersmoveontootherissues,usingseveraldifferent approaches.Chapter 7 dealswiththedefinitionandnatureofspace,wherethe problemsarequitesimilar,yetdifferent.Somehow,onecanseespacebytheobjects whicharepresentwithinit,andweallhaveanintuitiveunderstandingofspatiality. Fromaphysicalpointofview,thereisamajordifferencebetweenphysicalspace andemptyspace.Thebasicconceptualizationofspaceoccurredwithreferenceto ourownmovements,e.g.,theconceptofoneday-walkingdistance(approximately 25–30km),whichreappearsinthecontextofthelightyear(approximately9.45 1012 km).

Themeterwasdefi nedaccordingtoaninternationalconventionasone ten-millionthpartofaquarteroftheearthmeridian,beforeamoresophisticated definitionwasintroduced,viz.,thedistancetravelledbylightduring1/299792 458thofasecond.Obviously,sincethisnumberisrelatedtothespeedoflight,it teachesusnothing:distanceisde finedthroughtime,whichiscircular.Amore precisedefinitioncanbeobtainedbygoingbacktotheconceptualissueof “physicalspacebeingtheconceptofwhatseparatestwosystems”.Accordingly, spatialityinemptyspaceisnotguaranteed.Furthermore,emptyspaceissimplya limitingconceptwhichneveractuallyexists,becausetherewillgenerallybewaves andrippleseverywhere.

Chapter 8 attemptstodescribethelinkbetweenspaceandtimemathematically intheframeworkofthespace-timeformalism.Theyarerelatedthroughthe Poincare–Einsteintransformationlawsofspecialrelativity,orthroughtheassociatedRiemannspace-timeinvariantintervalofthetheoryofgeneralrelativity,which takesintoaccountthegravityofmassiveobjectssuchasstarsorblackholes.In suchcases,thedefinitionoftime(orspace)becomesevenmoreabstract,beinga mathematicalconcept,wheretimeandspacearemodifi edbythespeedoftheobject understudy,orbygravityactingonit.

Theauthorendsthechapterbydescribinganumberofwell-knownexperiments, highlightingcertainparadoxicalfeatures.Noneoftheseexampleswillconvincethe readerthattimeandspaceareanythingotherthanpureconcepts,theinventionof humanbeingstoexplainandmasterthesurroundingworld,includingthemost remoteandmassiveobjectswithintheuniverse.Insuchcases,someofthetheoreticaltoolsdevelopedbyastrophysicistssuchasStephenHawkingactually introducethetimeparameterasacomplexquantity,yetanothersteptowardthe conceptualizationoftime.

Thelasttwochaptersaremorephilosophicallyoriented.InChap. 9,Patrice Dassonvilleprovidesanhistoricaloverviewoftimeandspace.Startingfromthe writtenprecursorsortracesofthesebasicconcepts,theauthortriestobuildupa progressiveconceptualizationoftimeandspace,throughrepetitiveseriesofevents (orspatialoccurrences),tothemostsophisticatedinterpretationoftimeandspace. ErnstMachconsideredthattimeandspacedonotexistbythemselves,butare simplyconvenientparametersforformulatingphysicalequations.Itmaybethat researchwillonedayproposemodelsthatgetridofspaceaswellastime,inanew physicsandanewdescriptionoftheuniverse.

Chapter 10 putsforwardsomeideasbasedonjustsuchanewdescriptionofthe world,wheretimeandspacecanbereplacedbyotherdescriptors.Theauthorstarts byexplainingwhattimeandspaceareandwhattheyarenot.Hethenmovesonto thecharacteristicsof “thephysicalpropertiesofsystems”,whichinturnimplythe “mathematicalpropertiesoftimeandspace”.Heinvestigatesthecausallink,well knownanddocumentedinthephysicalsciences,betweenacauseandtheobserved effects,showingthatinmanycircumstances,e.g.,inquantumphysicswheretimeis stochastic(i.e.,probabilistic),theredoesnotexistaformallinkbetweencauseand effect.TheBigBangcannotsetthefundamentalreferencetimetozero,because thereisnoparticularreasontodoso.Relativityandquantumphysicshavebroken theholdweoncehadontimeandspace,becauseoftheintricaciesintheassociated mathematicalmodeling.Attheendofhislife,Einsteinhimselfwasthinkingabouta newphysicswheretimeandspacewouldbetotallyremovedfromtheoretical models.

ThebookendswithashortsummaryandconclusioninChap. 11,andaglossary bringingtogethermanywordsandexpressionsrelatingtotimeandspace(Chap. 12). Heretheauthoropenssomenewdirectionsforresearch.Theconceptoftimeis generallyspeaking,inthecommonsense,poorlyandarbitrarilyintroduced,and usuallyremainsill-de fined.

Theauthor ’sexperienceinhispastworkasascientistandengineerworkingin many fieldsandmanydifferentlocations,includingtheUSA,France,andAfrica, qualifyhimforthisin-depthdiscussionoftheconceptoftimeanditsusein everydaylifeandpotentialapplications.Thebookiswellwrittenandproperly documented,withmanyintriguingandoriginalexamplesanddiscussions.Itshould interestscholarsandscientists,aswellasthegeneralpublic.Itcouldbereadasa complementtoothersources,suchasthewell-knownbook Abriefhistoryoftime byStephenHawking,whichwaswrittenwiththeaimofexplainingthecosmosand cosmology,gravitationandblackholes,theexpansionoftheuniverse,thebigbang andtime,toawideaudience,butotherwisecontainsnosimpleandrigorous descriptionoftimeandspace.

PatriceDassonville’sbookgoesbacktosomeverybasicandnaturalideasand concepts.Timeliesattheveryheartofoureverydaylives.Timeandspacewilllong remainapuzzle,notonlyforthosetrainedinthephysicalsciences,butalsofor others,includingpoetsandordinarypeoplelookingoutintothecosmos.There, withintherelevantmathematicalmodels,timeissimplyconnectedtospacethrough thespeedoflight,theMinkowski–Einsteintransformationlaws,andthetheory

ofgeneralrelativity.Theexistenceofgravitationalwaves,discoveredbyan internationalteamatthebeginningof2016,justintimeforthe100thanniversary oftheirtheoreticalpredictionbyAlbertEinsteininoneofhisseminalpapers, constitutesamajorbreakthroughforscienceandtechnologyattheonsetofthe twenty- firstcentury.

Professor,FormerDirectoroftheFaculté desScienceset Techniques,Université duMaine,LeMans,France(2011–2016)

Acknowledgements

MywarmestthankstoDr.Jean-JacquesBénet,ProfessorEmeritus,Unityof RegulatedDiseases,ZoonoticDiseasesandEpidemiology, ÉcoleNational Vétérinaired’Alfort(France),andDr.BernardSurugue,Anthropologist,Honorary ResearchDirector,InstitutdeRecherchepourleDéveloppement,Université Panthéon-Sorbonne(Paris),fortheiradviceandencouragement.

IamgratefultoProf.Dr.BernardCastagnède,formerDirectoroftheFaculté des Sciences,Université duMaine,LeMans(France),forhisearlyinterestinmy research,andforagreeingtowritetheforewordtothisbook.

ThanksalsotoStephenLyleforhiscarefulreviewofthetranslation,andto Dr.AngelaLahee,SeniorPhysicsEditoratSpringer-Verlag,forherhelpand support.

5.9.1Time

5.12.7Nowadays

5.13Proto-TemporalityinEgypt

6.1.2De

6.1.3De

6.4.2

8.2

6.7.2TheNatureoftheConceptof

7.2.1Length

7.2.2Distance

7.2.3TheBirthofthe

7.2.4TheMetricSystem

8.1.1The

8.1.2Speed

8.2.1PhenomenologyofChance

8.4.1ActionofGravityonaClock

8.4.2Poincaré

8.4.3FiveAttemptswithSpecialRelativity

8.4.4ThreeAttemptswithGeneralRelativity

8.5 QuantumTime

8.5.1TheStateofaQuantumSystem

8.6.1MathematicalPropertiesof

8.6.2TheCPTTheorem .............................

8.7GeneralPropertiesof

9.1.1Observation

9.1.2Repetition ...................................

9.1.3Designation ..................................

9.1.4TheConceptof

9.2TheConceptualizationof

9.2.1Observation

9.2.2Representation

9.2.3Designation

9.2.4TheConceptof

9.3EvolutionoftheConceptsof

9.3.1ThePrototypalEra

9.3.2TheTypalEra

9.3.3TheArchetypalEra

9.4ComplexificationoftheConceptsof

9.4.1ArchetypeorPrototype?

9.4.2TheComplexificationofConcepts

10.2.1InRepresentations

10.2.2The

10.2.3Prediction

10.2.4Demographyand

10.2.5TheLogicof

10.2.6AchronyandAtopy

Chapter1 Introduction

Abstract Time and physicalspace arepartofoureverydaylivesandcutacrossall fieldsofknowledge.Eachofusputsthemtousewithoutasecondthought,surethat weknowthemwellenough;butscienceandphilosophyarestillunabletoexplain whattheyare.Thismeansthatapartofourculturalandscientificbackgroundis excludedofknowledge;moreover,ourholdonthesepointsofreferencemay graduallyweaken.Thiscreatessomethingofapredicamentforresearcherswho buildorusemathematicalmodelswhichinclude time and/or space. Somerather sparsearchaeologicaldatacanbeusedtoidentifythegeographicalandhistorical originsofboth time and space.Furthermore,technicalanalysisofthesedataallows ustodefinethetwonotions,identifytheirnature,describetheirproperties,and clarifytheissueoftheirphysicalexistence.

Whenonebeginsthestudyof time and physicalspace,the firstimpressionisoneof acertainsemanticdisorder,andalackoftheoreticaldata.Forexample,the aphorism timegoesby assumesthat time hasavelocity,whichwouldhavetobe expressedrelativetotime;buttalkingaboutthevelocityof time relativeto time wouldbecircular,sotheideathat timegoesby isalsountenable.

Time and space canbefoundeverywherefromphysicallawstomedicine, architecture,painting,cookery,andoenology;butnotinpuremathematics,because theconceptofvariationisexpressedwithout time,andbecause space isan abstractionthathasnothingtodowith physicalspace.

Mathematicalspaces arerigorouslydefi ned,andtheircorrespondingproperties aredescribedwithaccuracy;buttheuseoftheword space bymathematiciansis potentiallymisleading.Incontrast, physicalspace assuchremainsundefinedandits propertiesareunknown.

Scienceandphilosophyconsider time and space tobesomewhatenigmatic. Whilein Theartofloving,theLatinpoetOvid(43BC–18AD)assertedthat with timeyouwillconquerPenelope ([1]: BookI),Plutarch(c.46–c.125)wascareful enoughtosayhehad leisure insteadof freetime (Ch.4,17: LifeofCesar, 11, 5). BishopAureliusAugustinus(354–430)complainedinhis Confessions that time wasfamiliartohim,butotherwisetotallyelusiveifeverheattemptedtoexplainit

© SpringerInternationalPublishingSwitzerland2017

P.F.Dassonville, TheInventionofTimeandSpace, DOI10.1007/978-3-319-46040-6_1

[2].In TheDivineComedy,Dante(1265–1321)deploredthatweknowthenameof things,whereaswedonotknowtheirmeaninguntilothersexplainit([3]: The ParadiseXX).

Inthecollectiveconscience, time exists;it flowscontinuouslyandatvarious ratesdependingonthesituation.Thethesisofitsphysicalexistenceiswidely upheldindebate,publications,andpublicopinion;thethesisofitsinexistenceis supportedbyfew.Spacesurroundsus.Westandinsideit.Itgoeswithoutsaying. Thisisjustobvious;wesimplyneedtoopenoureyesandlookaround.The existenceof space isnodoubt;butwerarelytalkabout space,becausewedonot knowwhattosayaboutit,orhowtoexplainit.

Alltheseopinionsshareacommonpoint:theyhavenotbeendemonstrated,so theycannotbeacceptedastheoreticaldata.

In ThePeloponnesianWar,theGreekfounderofhistoricalscience,Thucydides (c.465–c.395),observedthatmenpreferpreconceptionsratherthanthequestfor truth([4]: Book1, 20).Ourknowledgeof time isanesthetizedbymerehabitsof thinkingandbythereflexesofeverydaylanguage.Ourknowledgeof physical space,whichismoreconfidentialbecauseofitscomplexity,islaidtowasteby commentsdevoidofanydidactic1 content.In TheHistories ,theGreekhistorian Herodotus(484–425)alreadydemandedto knowwithscientificcertainty ([5]: Book II, 119).

Time and physicalspace seemtohavebeenabandonedbytheoreticalresearch; althoughtheyplayamajorroleintherepresentationofphysicalrealitiesandinthe modelingofphenomena.Wemaythusregretthefactthattherearenodefi nitionsof time and space inthe draftresolutions andinthe resolutions publishedperiodically bythe ConferenceGénéraledesPoidsetMesures sinceits firstmeetingin1889[6]. Thisignoranceof time and space isadifficultywhoseseriousnesshasnotbeen evaluatedyet.Researcherswhodevelopmathematicalmodelsorwhouseexisting models,involvingnotionsof time and/or space,wouldbebetterinformedifthey knewsomethingabouttheirnatureandproperties.

Thecircumstancesinwhich temporality and spatiality aroseinhistorywillallow ustodecidewhethertheyexistphysicallyornot(Fig. 1.1).Thesearchdescribed hereresultsfromthediscoveryofthe fi rstreferencesto time and space inthevery broadcorpusofarchaeologicaldatanowavailable.Thescienceofarchaeologytells uswhattheAncientsdid,anditalsogivesusthemeanstoanalysehowtheydidit.

• Chapter 2,THEMAINISSUES,isaninventoryofthemainproblemswhich remaintobesolved.

• Chapter 3,THEFAILUREOFDIALECTICS,isacriticalanalysisofthe semanticdisorderprevalenthere,identifyingwhathasledtothefailureof classicalreasoning.

• Inordertoacquiretherelevanttechnicalmeans,Chap. 4,REALITY, CONCEPTS,ANDMODELS,focusesonthedistinctionbetween reality and concept,discussingwhatconstitutesa model,theprocessof model-building,and

1FromtheGreek didactikos:teaching.

Fig.1.1 Anunprecedentedinquiryintotheoriginsof time and space

a physicallaw,andspellingoutthedifferencebetweena mathematicalproperty anda physicalproperty.

• Chapter 5,THEORIGINSOF TIME AND SPACE,exploressomeancient civilizationsinthesearchfor precursorsoftime and space.Theaimisto identifytheemergenceof temporality and spatiality inhumanhistory,andthus decidewhethertheywerediscoveredorinvented.

• Chapter 6,DEFINITIONANDNATUREOF TIME,discussesdefinitionsof timeunits anddefi nitionsof time itself,butalsothephenomenologyandnature of time.

• Chapter 7,DEFINITIONANDNATUREOF SPACE,defines lengthunits, physicalspace,and emptyspace,anddiscussesthenatureof space.

• Chapter 8,MATHEMATICALPROPERTIESOF TIME AND SPACE,investigatesthepropertiesof time and space inthemainareasofphysics.

• Chapter 9,HISTORICALOVERVIEWOF TIME AND SPACE,attemptsto situatetheoriginsoftheprecursorsof temporality and spatiality,sothatwemay observehowtheyweregraduallysetup,until time and space finallycameinto being.

• Chapter 10,CONSEQUENCESOFNON-EXISTENCE,isastudyofsome culturalandscientifi cconsequencesofthephysicalnon-existenceof time and space.

Bibliography

1.Ovidius.(43BC–18AD).(1965). Theartofloving (L’artd’aimer Leclubfrançaisdulivre Collection “Privilège”).Paris.

2.Augustinus,A.(354–430).BorninHippo,aformerCarthaginiancolony;nowAnnabain Algeria. Confessions (398AD).

3.Alighieri,D.(1265–1321). TheDivineComedy (LaDivineComédie notdated). Paris-Bruxelles:Thillpublishing.

4.Thucydides.(c.465–c.395).(1964). ThePeloponnesianWar (LaGuerreduPéloponèse, TranslationfromGreekintoFrenchbyD.Roussel).Paris:Folioclassique,Gallimard.

5.Herodotus.(484–425).(1964). Thehistories (L’Enquête,TranslationfromGreekintoFrench byA.Barguet).Paris:Folioclassique,Gallimard.

6.CGPM ConférenceGénéraledesPoidsetMesures (generalconferenceonweightsand measures www.bipm.org).

Chapter2

TheMainIssues

Abstract Thelackofdifferentiationbetween practice, dialectic,and theory is problematic.Thequestionofpracticeconcernstheway time and space areused;it seemstohavedevelopedtothedetrimentofthetheory.Dialecticisarigorousform ofreasoning:itiswhatwethink.Butthedialecticsof time and space arebogged downbypractice,andsufferinterferencefromeverydaylanguageusage.The stringentrequirementsoftheoryarenolongerrespected.Atheoryisintendedto enrichandorganizeknowledge:itiswhatweknow.Nevertheless time and space arenottheorized:theyarenotdefined,theirnatureisunknown,theirpropertiesare notidentifi ed,andtheirexistenceisnotclari fied.Thereiseveryreasontothinkthat thislackoftheorymayleadtoagradualaccumulationofdiffi cultiesforany researchinvolving time and/or space,mainlyinthemathematicalmodelingof phenomenaandinphilosophicalconceptionsoftheworld.

DespiteDante’swarning,philosophytreats time and physicalspace as primordial categoriesofunderstanding,althoughitdoesnotexplainwhat time and space are. FortheGreekphilosopherAristotle(384–322), time and place weretwohisten categoriesofunderstanding[1].TheGermanphilosopherEmmanuelKant (1724–1804)considered time and space astwooutoftwelvecategories[1]:Kant assertedthat time and space werepureintuitions,cognizablebyintellect.Since then,anthropologistshavediscoveredpeoplewithout time and/orwithout space, showingthat time and space arenotintuitions(infra Ch.10.2.8).Ethologistshave shownthatlivingthingshavecertainpracticesof temporality and spatiality,withan astonishingacuityinhighermammals,althoughtheycansometimesbemisledby certain fieldeffects,justaswecan(infra Ch.4.5).

Foritspart,physicshasneverattemptedtodescribe time:accordingtoEtienne Klein,physicsislessinterestedinthenatureof time thaninthebestwayto representit[2].However,thelackofdefinitionsfor duration, time, length,and physical space isaseriousconcern. Time and physicalspace areaporias:then involveirresolvablelogicaldiffi culties,favoringnescience,whichistheignorance ofwhatoneisunabletolearn(from nescius:ignorant),andfavoringalsopsittacism

© SpringerInternationalPublishingSwitzerland2017 P.F.Dassonville, TheInventionofTimeandSpace, DOI10.1007/978-3-319-46040-6_2

orparroting,i.e.,therepetitionofwordsorphraseswhosemeaningisunknown (from psittacinus:parrot).

Theconfusionbetweenpractice,dialectic,andtheory,seemstobethecauseof theobservedsemanticreductionsandindeedthemaincauseofthedifficultiesin evaluating time and physicalspace,whichraisesomanypressingquestions.

2.1 Time and Space inEverydayLife

Theappearanceof temporality and spatiality inoureverydaylivesishighlyfragmented,concerningusage,use,applications,utilizations,measurements,mythologies,andsymbolisms.Thesethingsarefamiliartothegeneralpublicanddescribed bythehumanitiesandsciences.

However,agenerallyagreeddialectic,whichisblindedbythesuccessof time and physicalspace,andconfusedbytheirbewilderingpolynomy,1 cannotenrich anytheoreticalcorpus:thetheoryof time andthetheoryof space arestrickenby ignorance,andsoarestillexcludedfromtherealmofacademicknowledge.

Ofcourse,thesepracticesshouldnotbeneglected:indeed,theirstudy through archaeology,literature,history,philosophy,biology,chemistry,physics, technology,anthropology,psychology,statistics,art,mathematics providesa fruitfulcontributiontothetheoryof time andalsotothetheoryof physicalspace

2.2Dialecticsof Time andDialecticsof Space

Thedialectic2 of time ispowerless:atbest,itisaxiomatic,atworst,itisindigent, becauseitisboggeddownintheproblemof practices,thecomfortofconsensus, andconventionalwaysoftalking.Andasfaras physicalspace isconcerned,its dialecticjustdoesn’texist.

Assertingthat time hasa course andan arrow accordingtophysics,that it flows andthat it causes aging accordingtopopularbelief,that it isa categoryofthought accordingtophilosophy,that it isa flux anda strength forBergson[3],that it is being forHeideggerin SeinundZeit [4],that it keepsdividingitselfinto before and after withthe motionoftheinstant accordingtoDeleuze,justdoesnotteachus anythingabout time,aboutitsnatureanditsproperties.Byendlesslyrepeatingthat space surroundsus,orthatobjectsoccupy space,orthatthingsarein space,wedo notlearnanythingabout physicalspace.

Ovidobserved: Onebelieveseasilywhatonedesires (Ch.1,6: BookIII).

1Varietyoforganizationalformsanddifferentuses;fromGreek molof (nomos):law. 2FromGreek diakevsivof, dialektikos:artofconversing.

2.3TheLackofTheory7

2.3TheLackofTheory

Theaimofatheoryistoprovideunderstandingandtostructureourknowledge, excludingbeliefs,opinions,andconvictions.Nietzscheconsideredconvictionsto bedetrimentalinthesearchfortruth[5].Freudstigmatizedsimplifi cationsmadeto thedetrimentoftruth;andwhenhewasteachingpsychoanalysisattheFacultyof MedicineofViennain1916,hewarnedhisstudentsnottogiveintosympathyor antipathyintheirscientificarbitrations[6].Anytheoryof time or physicalspace mustbeconsistentwithpractice;inotherwords,practicemustverifyandconfirm theory.

Thereisnoinformationavailableaboutanytheoriesof time or physicalspace:

• Lackofdefinition.Defi nitionisoneoftheprimaryrequirementsforknowledge. Todefinesomethingistosaywhatitis.However,dictionariesandencyclopediasprovideonlydefaultdefinitions,whichdonotexplainwhat time and physicalspace actuallyare.

• Unknownnature.Neitherthenatureof time,northenatureof physicalspace are describedinscientificandphilosophicalworks(mostofwhicharedevotedto time ratherthan physicalspace).

• Unidentifiedproperties;Experimentsandobservationsdonotbringtolightany physicalpropertiesof time and physicalspace,although,suchpropertiesare indisputableconditionsfortheirspeci ficphysicalexistence.Thenotionof “property” iscrucial,becauseitallowsscientiststohaveacommonviewof realityandphenomena:indeedtheperceptionofanobjetortheanalysisofa phenomenonmustnotdependonthecultureorthepsycheoftheresearcher.

• Speci ficactionsof time havebeenneitherrecorded,nordescribed.Thereisno traceofanyconsequenceinducedby time.

• Phenomenologyisconsideredasimplicitbuthasneverbeenestablished.No phenomenoncanbeattributedto time. Theetiology3 of aging willsheda decisivelightontheallegedroleof time.

• Physicalspace isthecauseofnoidentifiedphenomenon.Thepossible materialityof space hasbeenneitherobservednorexperimented,evenwith relativisticcovariance(infra Ch.8.4).

• Existenceistreatedasaprinciple,butisneverproven.Itislegitimateto questionthephysicalexistenceof time and space.Yet,thespecifi cexistenceof time and space ismerelypostulated,notproven.

Furthermore,allsciencesarebasedonmodelsinwhich time and space occupya hegemonicplace,eventhoughnoneofthesesciencescandescribethenatureof time and physicalspace.

3FromtheGreek aisiokocia, aitiologia:studyofcauses; aisia, aitia:cause.

2.4TheProblemSituation

Thephysicalissueof time andthephysicalissueof space remainunexplored.Does time havesomekindofconstitutiveelementwhichactivatesphenomenasuchas aging?DoestheUniverseproduce time?Areclocksactivatedby time?Dothey generate time?Are time and space measurableorobservableassuch?Does physical space havemateriality?Canwecarryoutexperimentsonobjectswhosenatureis unknown?Dotheallegedexperimentsprovideinformationaboutthenatureand propertiesof time and space?Whenwere temporality and spatiality observedfor the firsttimeinhumanhistory?Weretheydiscoveredorinvented?Finally,whyis time aprotectedtopic,areserved fieldofstudy,asensitiveissuecontrolledbya kindofochlocracy4?

Answeringthesequestionswillremovemuchoftheshadowcastover time and physicalspace.But firstitwillbeusefultoaskwhydialectichasfailedinthis instance.

Bibliography

1.Cuvillier,A.(1955). PetitVocabulairedelaLanguePhilosophique (basicvocabularyofthe philosophicallanguage).Paris:LibrairieArmandColin.

2. Télérama. (2000).(Paris,April12,2000).

3.Bergson,H.(1859–1941).(1947). L’ÉvolutionCréatrice (1907).Paris:P.U.F.

4.Heidegger,M.(1889–1976). SeinundZeit (1927)(Beingandtime,TranslationfromGerman intoFrench,forewordandnotesbyE.Martineau).Digitalpublishing,offtrade.

5.Nietzsche,F.(1844–1900).(2009). Morgenröte (1881) (Aurora,citedin Lire,February 2009).

6.Freud,S.(1856–1939).(1949). VorlesungenzurEinführungindiePsychoanalyse (1916) (Introductiontopsychoanalysis,TranslationfromGermanintoFrenchbyDr.S.Jankélévitch). Paris:Payot.

4Powerexertedbya crowd (fromtheGreekojηkor, okhlos).

Chapter3

TheFailureofDialectics

Abstract Thefailureofthedialecticsof time and space hasvariousorigins:

• Theconfusionbetween time and event,e.g.,theconfusionbetween pasttime and pastevent

• Thenon-rigoroususeoflanguage,e.g.,questionslikethe duration of present time.

• Thedifficultyinunderstandingthedifferencebetweenaphenomenonwhich belongstophysicalreality,andthecorrespondingmentalconstructorconcept, e.g.,wemeasurechangesinsteadof hours.

• Thedichotomybetween time and space,attemptingtomake time, space,and spacetime,physicalrealities.

• Thecountlessmetaphorsinwhich time hasanactiverole(dynamicsof time, actionof time,arrowof time),andinwhich space hasamateriality.

Dialecticis whatproceedsfromrigorousreasoning.Therelevanceofthemethods ofdialecticscollapsesassoonasrealityreachesacertainlevelofcomplexity: rigorousreasoningisnolongerenough, determinationsoflogic sodeartophilosophy(Kant,Hegel)andthe intuitionoftheworldperceivedwithallthatis obviousinit (Bergson),arepowerlesstounderstandthecomplexityoftheworld: thelawsofphysics,chemistry,orbiologyowenothingtoSocraticmaieuticsorto eristics.1

Whenonedeepensone’sstudyofreality,theapproachisneitherevident,nor logical,norintuitive.Theeffi ciencyoflogicisofshort-rangeandthereliabilityof intuitiondoubtful. Concepts areoftentakenfor realities,e.g., time iscommonly likenedtothe flow ofwater,wheneveronesaysthat time flows. Time flowslike water,wroteOvid(Ch.1,6: BookIII).Notonlydoesthesimiletellusnothing,but itismisleading.

Theproblemsraisedby time andby space arefarfrombeingsimpleandlinear: thedialecticrunsroundincirclesuntilitcollapsesfromexhaustion.Intheintroduction,severalfundamentalunresolvedissueswerebroughttolight,facedwitha

1Exerciseofcontroversy.Cicero(106–43BC): rescontroversa,controversialissue.

© SpringerInternationalPublishingSwitzerland2017 P.F.Dassonville, TheInventionofTimeandSpace, DOI10.1007/978-3-319-46040-6_3

realitydevoidoflogicandevidence:classicalreasoningfailsandonemustthereforeproceedotherwise,byintroducingaheterodox2 operatingprocedure.

Time iswellknowntoallofus,assomethingwhichactsonthings,whichpasses fasterorslower,orwhichbringsaboutchangeslike aging.However,noneofthis haseverbeenproven.

Ifwedonotaskwhat time is,thereisnowaywecanassertthat it flows,that it causes aging,that it isacategoryofunderstanding,orthat it hasacourse:[…] after thecourseofmanydaysandmonths,wrotetheGreekpoetHomer(8thcenturyBC) ([1]: SongXIX).

Scientificpublicationsandphilosophicalliterature,whicharededicatedto temporality,use time inmathematicalmodelsandinintellectualconstructs;butthey donotsaywhatitis,andtheydonotdescribeitsnatureanditsproperties.Allusions to space arefurtive,embarrassed,andweakenedbysophistry:themoreathing seemsobvious,themoreitisdifficulttoexplain. Space isobvious,itsurroundsus. Whatelsecanwesay?Butwhatexactlyisitthatsurroundsus? Space israrely mentioned,perhapsbecausewesenseacertaincomplexity.

TheLatinphilosopherLucretius(98or94–55BC)emphasizedthepovertyof language,whichrequiresnewwordsfornewobjects([2]: SongI, 138).Thushe describedthe “perspective” effect(SongIV, 429),whereastheword “perspectivus” onlyappearedduringthesixthcenturyAD.Healsomentioned “refraction” (from refringo:break): thepartsimmersedinwater, refracted (SongIV, 440).Perspective andrefractionare technicaleffectsof fi elds on space (infra,Ch.4.5).

Dante(Ch.1,2)pointedoutthatwordstonamefactswereoftenmissing (Inferno, VI).Hecomplainedabouttheinsufficiencyoflanguageandthelimitsof ourminds(Inferno, XXIII).

Thestagnationofdialecticculminatesinrecurrences.Hereisacriticalinventory ofthemostcommonamongthem.

3.1ConfusionBetween Time and Event

Thetriad past-present-future doesnotteachusanything,becauseintheusualway ofspeaking,thesethreetermsarecommonlyusedtoreferto events,ratherthan time,e.g., past and pasttime mean pastevents.Asamatteroffact, pasttime does notmeananything,insofaraswedonotknowthemeaningoftheword time.

In TheArtofPoetry,theLatinpoetHorace(68–8BC)mockedtheoldmanwho praises pasttime (laudatortemporisacti)[3];ofcourse,Horacemeant pastlife or pastevents,insteadof pasttime assuch.Ovidrejoiced: Otherspraisethepast;for myself, Iampleasedtobeborninthiscentury (Ch.1,6: BookIII).Tacitususedthe expression successionoftimes insteadof successionofevents (Ch.8,8: BookXII, 2FromtheGreek doxa:opinionand hétéros:different;oppositeto orthodox; orthos:straight.

Ch.XL, 5).However,thisbasicdistinctionbetween time and event isnottakeninto account,probablypassedoverduetothepersuasivehabitsofeverydaylanguage.

Historytellsof events,not time. Inhis HistoricalLibrary [4],Diodorus(c.90–30)stressedthefactthathistoryhasvaluablelessonstoteachus:thehistorythat Diodoruswastalkingaboutconcerned pastevents and presentevents,ratherthan pasttime and presenttime. Thucydidesobservedtheconflictwhichopposed AthenaandSpartafrom431to404BC,pulledintoconflictbytheirvarious alliances.Hedidnotstudy presenttime,but presentevents.Hefollowedthe sequenceofeventsinordertounderstand,andtoaccomplishhisworkasahistorian (Ch.1,4:Book V, 26).DuringoneofhisfamousspeechesPericles(495–429) warnedtheaudience;[…] theeventsofwarareuncertain:Periclesdidnotreferto timesofwar.

Inhisconference Laconscienceetlavie (in L’ÉnergieSpirituelle)at BirminghamUniversityin1911,Bergson[5]describedthe present,asa duration thickness locatedbetweenour immediatepast andour imminentfuture.The philosopherdidnotexplainwhata durationthickness was.Perhapshedidnot understandthat thickness isa spatial conceptandthat past, present,and future have todowith events,not time.

In Letempsetsa flèche [6],MichelPatypointsoutthatthephilosopherAlfred NorthWhitehead(1861–1947)thoughtthata duration hada temporalthickness (1919).Inthesamework,J.M.Lévy-Leblondclaimsthatthereisa width anda thickness between future and past

Thereissomethingstrangeabouttheideathatthe present shouldhavea duration:

• Eitherthe present designatesa presentevent,inwhichcasethe duration ofthe present isgivenbyastopwatch.

• Orthe present designatesthe presenttime;butthe duration ofthe presenttime is apleonasmofthe fi rstorder.

TheFrenchword avenir (fromLatin advenire:toarrive)isself-contradictingifit istranslatedby futureevents,because futureevents donotexist.Forecasterstryto predict futureevents,i.e.,theirpredictionsreferto events ratherthan time.Theword fatum (fate,destiny)namesthebeliefaccordingtowhichthe future,includingeven themostinconsequentialevents,iswrittenordecidedinadvance.Periclesobserved thatpeoplethoughtfatewasthecauseoftheirfailures(Ch.1,4: BookI, 140). Untilweareabletodefine time,itiscrucialtounderstandthedifferencebetween apieceofinformationwitha temporal content,andsomeofthe corresponding events orsomeofthe possiblecorrespondingevents: (a)Withthe past

• Exampleof pasttime: 1939–1945

• Someofthe correspondingpastevents: WorldWarII

(b)Withthe present

• Exampleof presenttime: today

• Someofthe correspondingpresentevents:Festivalopening.

(c)Withthe future

• Exampleof futuretime: 21stcentury.

• Someofthe possiblefutureevents:climateupheaval.

Weobservethatinformationwithastrict temporal contentispoor,consistingof justafewnumbers,whilethe correspondingevents and probableevents aremuch moresubstantial,becausetheinformationtheycarryisincomparablyricher.

3.2TerminologicalConfusion

Theconfusionbetween time and events isnotlimitedtothisinevitabletriad;indeed, ithasinvadedall fields.AninvestigationcarriedoutbyReinbergandHalbergabout peoplesufferingfrombraindeathinFrancebetween1962and1967observeda greaterfragilityduringwinter seasons.JacquesAttalitakesthisasanactionof time onindividuals([7]: Ch.4),whereasinfactthereisnoactionof time,merelya seasonalclimaticimpact.Thucydidesavoidedthismistake,whenhetalkedabout theseason(August)duringwhichpeople’shealthgrowsweaker(Ch.1,4: Book VII, 47).HistranslatorDenisRousselnotesthatphysiciansoftheCôsSchool(that ofHippocratesc.460–c.377BC)weretakingtheinfluenceofclimateandseasons intoaccount.

In1953,theFrenchpoetLouisAragonproclaimedwithouthesitationthatStalin, whohadjustdied,was thegreatestphilosopherofalltime [8].Naturally,weshould understandhere: inthewholehistoryofphilosophy,asthepoetdidnotknowthe meaningoftheword time.

3.3TruismsandPleonasms

De fininga firstwordwithasecondword,andthendefiningthesecondwordwith the first,youhaveatruism. Time isoftendefinedby duration and duration is frequentlydefinedby time;thesearefallacies,because time and duration denotethe sameconcept,andtheyarebothexpressedwiththesameunits.

TIME ) DURATION ) TIME

3.3TruismsandPleonasms13

AccordingtotheFrenchDictionnaireLarousse(1972), timeisthemeasureofthe durationofphenomena,and duration is thespaceoftimethatsomethinglasts:four words time, duration, space, last thatsuccessivetruismsfailtodefi ne. 3

3.4AdjunctionofExoticConcepts

Itisusefultodistinguish concept, exo-concept, conception, and conceptualization.

3.4.1TheConcept

TheGreekhistorianPlutarch(c.50–125)emphasizedtheeffectivenessof an explanationdrawnfromaprincipleofnature ([10]: LifeofCamillus, 3.1).The followingisinspiredbythisremarquableobservation.Aconceptistheideathatone hasaboutarealityoraphenomenon.Itisthereforeaconstructionofthemind. Conceptualizationconsistsinobservingarealityoraphenomenon,withthepurposeofinducingthecorrespondingconcept:

OBSERVATIONofaREALITYoraPHENOMENON ) CORRESPONDINGCONCEPT

ThusweobservethemovementsoftheSun,ratherthanthe day asa unit:

ALTERNATINGAPPEARANCESoftheSUN(phenomenon) ) DAY asa unit (concept)

Thepsychoanalystobservesclinicalsymptomsofneurosis,notneurosisitself:

CLINICALSYMPTOMS(observablephenomenon) ) NEUROSIS (concept)

Aconcepthasnophysicalproperties,soitdoesnotexistphysically,anditis neitherobservablenormeasurable.

3.4.2ConceptandExo-Concept

Anexoticconcept,orexo-concept,isonethatisunrelatedtotherelevantidea;its useisonethatbreakssemanticrules.Inexpressionslike lengthoftime or spaceof time,theterms length or space are spatial exo-concepts.Theseintrudersencourage confusion.

In L’évolutioncréatrice,Bergsonassertedthat time wasa flux,butonthefollowingpage,declaredthat time was akindofforce (Ch.2,1: p.338).However, flux

3ThephilosopherMauriceMerleau-PontysummarizedHenriBergson’sthinking: Timeistherefore me, IamthedurationthatIgrasp, itisinmethatdurationgraspsitself ([9]: Ch.7).

and force aremutuallyexclusive;itiseitheroneortheother,orelseitisneither. Bergsondidnotdescribethenatureofthe flux;furthermorethequalifier “kindof” is neverusedinphysics.

TheGermanphilosopherMartinHeideggerpostulatedtheexistenceof time and thephenomenologyof time.Hethoughtof time asa being,andconfused time, events,and historiality;hewonderedwhythe fluxoftime couldnotbereversed(Ch. 2,4).Despitehisbaroquephraseology,hecouldnotexplainthenatureof time.

TheDictionnaireLarousse(1993)de fined time asfollows: aninfinitemedium […] oftenconsideredasaforce, actingontheworldandonbeings. FortheFrench DictionnaireRobert(1993), time is anundefinedmedium… whichisverydifferent. Unde fined meansonlythatsomethingis notdefined,or unknown,whereas infinite means unlimitedinsize,or boundless,whenceitisamathematicalconcept,unrelatedtophysicalreality.

HerewemayaddsomedefinitionsbytheFrenchphilosopherA.Cuvilier (Ch.2,2):

• time: ahomogeneousandinfinitemediuminwhicheventsaresupposedtotake place

• duration: a finiteandgenerallymeasuredportionoftime.

Usingthesespatialexo-concepts(medium, space, width, portion, thickness, below horizontalit yand verticality,then orientation)todescribe time constitutesa metaphoricaldiversionwithouttheoreticalimpact.Suchattemptsto spatializetime areineffectivebecausethenatureof space isunknown.Theconfusionbetween time and space wasfosteredbytheprecursorsof temporality and spatiality. ThisgradualdriftisobservedinclassicalLatinliterature,forinstance,in Lucretius(98or94BC–55BC)with theimmensityoftime ([2]: SongV, 427)and withthe infinitenessoftime ([2]: SongII, 574 et SongV, 378);inCaesar(101BC–44BC)andCicero(106BC–43BC),withthe spatium whichwasa garden or square,then extent,then space,and finally, aspaceoftime.For spaceoftime, LucretiusandTitusLivius(c.59BC–17AD)used spatiumtempus,andTacitus distantitempore.

3.4.3ConceptionandArtifact

Anartifactisanobjectconceivedordesignedonthebasisofanidea: IDEA ) DESIGNOFTHECORRESPONDINGARTIFACT

TheclepsydraisawaterclockinventedbytheBabylonians(18–16thcentury BC)underthenameof gish-Lu-Lu,whichmeans waterthief (Ch.5,9: Ch.VI). CtesibiusofAlexandriainventedhisownclepsydrainc.270BC.InRomantimes, towastewater meant towastetime (Ch.4,1: Ch.IV).InCicero, Adclepsydram

meant underthecontrolofaclepsydra. Plutarchusedtheexpression tomeasurethe wateroftheclepsydras ([10]: LifeofAlcibiade, 19, 5):

IDEAOFMEASURINGCHANGES ) DESIGNOFACLEPSYDRA

Aclockisadevicewhosefunctioningiscorrelatedwiththeconfi gurationofthe SunandEarth(Fig. 3.1).Whenusedasclocks,therhythmsofnaturedonot generate time. Aclockdoesnotproduce time anditdoesnotconsume time;the time displayedissubjecttostrictinternationalconventions.Theidea(concept)of measuringchanges(phenomena)ismadeconcretebytheinventionoftheclock (artifact):thisisconceptionordesign,i.e.,thematerializationofaconceptthrough thegnomon,sundial,clepsydra,andclock.ConsiderwhatPetronius(?–65AD) said: … aclocknearwhicha “bucinator” (latinwordfora “trumpetplayer”) warns usofthe flightofthedays, andtimegoneby ([11]: XXV). Days and hours cannotbemeasured;itischangesthataremeasured.

IDEAOFMEASURINGCHANGES ) MAKINGACLOCK

Fig.3.1 Designbasedonanidea

3.5TheDichotomyBetween Time and Space

Thepointofadichotomyistoseekoutwhatbringstogetherorwhatcontraststwo ideasortwophenomena,soastodrawlessons.Itisaveryelementaryprocessof dialectics,whichwasalreadyusedinSumerianproverbsintheearlythirdmillennium.S.N.KramerquotedaSumerianproverbrelatedto temporality: Friendshiplastsoneday, kinshiplastsforever ([12]: Ch.XVI).Perhapsthe equivalentoftheverb last didnotexistduring18thcenturyBC,buttheopposition oneday/forever showsaninterestingmaturityintheunderstandingof temporality.

FortheGreekphysicianHippocrates(c.460–c.377): Artislong, lifeisshort. Space issometimeslinkedtohorizontalitywhile time islinkedtoverticality,as iftoshowthatman,oncereleasedfromthehorizontalityof space,canriseto heaven,thankstotheverticalityof time ([13]: vol.II).Writing,whichisconsidered horizontal,isassociatedwith space;speech,whichisconsideredvertical,isassociatedwith time:thissophismissupposedtoprovethatspeechissuperiortowriting ([13]: vol.II).ButinanaddresstotheRomanSenate,Titus(c.40–81)explained whyspeechwasnotsuperiortowriting: Verbavolantscriptamanent (Words fly away;writingsremain).Itturnsoutthathorizontalityandverticalityare space concepts,andweknownothingabout space:theamalgamwith time istherefore inappropriate.

Another random document with no related content on Scribd:

CHAPTER 7

Our Offensive Running Game

The number one objective of offensive football is to score. If we cannot score, then the only alternative is to kick. We never want to surrender the ball to our opposition outside of the 4-down zone other than by kicking it to them. We cannot possibly win the tough football games if we lose the football by fumbles, interceptions, blocked kicks, or anything else other than by kicking the ball to our opponents.

BASIC PRINCIPLES AND REQUIREMENTS OF OFFENSIVE FOOTBALL

Offense is based on two primary principles, running with and/or passing the football. They go hand in hand and complement each other in all respects. A team must pass sufficiently in order to keep the opposition from putting all of its strength on or relatively close to the line of scrimmage. A team also must be able to advance the football with its ground game so the opposition does not have to defend against only one phase of the game, the passing attack.

The main requirements for playing offensive football are: (1) explosive speed, and (2) a real desire to carry out the specific assignment, whether it be to block, run or fake. Offense is a game of skill and perfection, and many hours must be spent working on it.

A Sound Offense

A sound offense is one in which each play is designed to gain ground, and if executed perfectly there is a good possibility for a long gain and/or scoring a touchdown. If the offense is going to operate at

maximum efficiency, the bad play must be eliminated completely The bad play is one that does not gain yardage. If the offense is based on the 4-yard per play or short thrust offense, such as Oklahoma has used so successfully in the past under Bud Wilkinson, it is clear to see how a bad play can stymie the offensive attack.

The sound attack also utilizes the best personnel available, such as the best ball carriers carrying the ball, the best blockers for blocking, and so on. If you will analyze your offensive attack, you are likely to learn this does not always occur. The best blocker might be carrying the ball more often than your best ball carrier, who in turn might not be a strong blocker.

We had a fine team at Texas A & M in 1956, but when I look back over the season I now realize I did not utilize my backs to maximum efficiency. Our quarterback, Roddie Osborne, was a very fine football player, and like the great ones he enjoyed running with the football. Roddie did a terrific job of running with the ball, but we had other outstanding backs, such as All-American John Crow, All-American Jack Pardee, and Lloyd Taylor, a great competitor. When the season was over and we tabulated our final statistics, we found Roddie had carried the ball nearly as many times as the combined carries of Crow, Pardee, and Taylor.

In order to maintain maximum results with the offense, it must be presented to the squad so they all have a complete understanding of what you are trying to accomplish and how it is going to be done. Unless the players have a thorough picture and understand the reasoning behind your offensive attack, maximum efficiency is impossible.

I firmly believe that the simpler the offense, the better. The fewer things a boy has to do and remember, the better he will execute the fundamentals you have taught him. If executed well, the player will have more confidence in what he is doing and his own ability. Consequently the greater the chance the offensive attack has of being successful.

OUR OFFENSIVE TERMINOLOGY

To be sure that we are all talking the same “language” and can understand each other readily, we have adopted the following offensive terminology:

Flow—Direction in which most of the backs start.

On-Side—Lineman on side of point of attack.

Off-Side—Lineman on side away from point of attack.

Near Back—Halfback on side of flow.

Far Back—Halfback away from side of flow.

On-Back—Of the two remaining backs in the backfield, the back toward call.

Off-Back—Of the two remaining backs in the backfield, the back away from call.

Point of Attack—Spot where ball crosses the line of scrimmage.

Over—Defensive man over any part of the offensive man.

Cut Off—Shoot the head and shoulder past the defensive man, destroying his correct pursuit angle to the football.

Set—Fake pass protection block.

Slam—Entertain defensive man with shoulder and forearm.

N/T—No one there.

Position Lateral—Getting self in position to receive lateral from the man with the football.

Covered—Designates offensive man with a defensive man over him on L.O.S.

L.B.—Linebacker.

M.L.B.—Middle linebacker.

L.O.S.—Line of scrimmage.

Man on L.O.S.—Defensive man down in 3- or 4-point stance on the line of scrimmage.

“6”—Right end.

“7”—Left end.

Club—A vicious running head and shoulder block attacking the defensive man’s upper extremities from the blind side. This block is used in the area approaching the point of attack.

Color—First man approached with different color jersey.

Motion—Back leaving before snap of the ball.

Ice—Receiver going to outside or inside and becoming a possible receiver after making his block or when no one shows. Yell “Ice” when open.

Trail Junction Blocker—Ball carrier straddling the outside leg of junction blocker. Stay close to him.

Pursuer—Defensive man pursuing the ball carrier.

Gap—Space between two offensive men.

Flare—Call to tell a back to run a flare route.

Drive Man—Man who does the driving on a two-on-one block.

Post Man—Man who stops the progress of the defensive man on a two-on-one block.

Odd Defense—Offensive guards not covered.

Even Defense—Offensive guards are covered.

Box Defense—Only two deep men in the secondary

3-Deep Defense—Three deep men in the defensive secondary

9-Man Front—Box defense.

8-Man Front—Three deep defense.

Position Ball—Bring ball immediately into belly, elbows in, ball in fingers.

Drive Block—A vicious head and shoulders block and turn opponent.

Climb Block—A brutal drive block.

Chop Block—Open field block on men in the secondary by throwing your body (extended) at his throat.

Crack Back—A vicious low reverse body block.

Groin Block—A low drive block with upward action aimed at defensive man’s groin.

Fill—Protect the area to your inside.

Shoot Out—Springing from your original stance, hitting on your hands and feet running (used to get downfield).

Against the Grain—Direction in the secondary opposite the flow.

On Linebacker—Denotes (on-side L.B. N/T M.L.B.).

Position—Getting to a spot between the man you are to block and the ball carrier

Roll Back—Position and block defensive man from blind side.

Eagle—Call to tackle and guard to switch assignments.

Head On—Man nose on nose.

We want all of our players and coaches to understand and use our offensive terminology. One or two words either explains the descriptive action we want or identifies some segment of the offense or the opposition’s defense. The terms are simple, meaningful and descriptive.

OUR OFFENSIVE STANCE

The offensive stance is very important. It is difficult enough trying to attain maximum results when they are lined up in their proper stance, but it puts your players at a distinct disadvantage and handicaps them greatly if you permit them to assume a stance that is improper and incorrect. Therefore, we put first things first, and try to coach our players always to take the proper stance.

Offensive Stance for Linemen

The stance for the linemen, with the exception of the center, is basically the same, with allowances being made for various physical characteristics, which vary from individual to individual. The inside foot is forward, the feet staggered in an arch to toe relationship. The tackles and ends exaggerate the stagger from heel to toe since they are further removed from the center and quarterback.

The feet should not be spread wider than the individual’s shoulders, with the weight of the body concentrated on the balls of the feet. The heels should be slightly in, with the cleats on the heel of the forward foot almost touching the ground. The ankles should be bent slightly. The knees should be bent slightly more than 90 degrees, and turned slightly in. The tail is even or a little higher than the shoulders, and splitting the forward and rear heels. The back is straight, shoulders square, neck relaxed, and eyes open keeping the defensive linebacker in line of sight. The hands are placed down slightly outside of the feet, elbows relaxed, and thumbs in and slightly forward of the shoulders.

Offensive Stance for Center

The center lines up in a left-handed stance with the feet even and slightly wider than the shoulders. The weight is on the balls of the feet, heels turned slightly in, with the cleats on the heels of the shoes almost touching the ground. The knees are slightly in and bent a little more than 90 degrees. The tail is slightly higher than the shoulders and about two inches in front of the heels. The center places his left hand inside his legs down from between his eye and ear almost

directly under the forehead, with the fingers spread and the thumb turned slightly in. The shoulders are square, the back is straight, the neck is relaxed, and the eyes looking upward. His right hand grasps the football like a passer. He should reach out as far as possible without changing his stance. The center is coached to place the ball on his tail as quickly as possible with a natural turn of the arm. He should drive out over the ball with his head coming up and tail down, keeping his shoulders square as he makes his hand-back to the quarterback.

Quarterback’s Stance

The quarterback is coached to get into a football position with the feet slightly wider than the shoulders, weight on the balls of the feet, heels and knees turned slightly in, knees bent slightly, and a natural bend at the waist in order to be in a good position to receive the ball from the center as he snaps the ball on the hand-back. The elbows must be bent and in close to the body.

The quarterback’s right hand goes up in the center’s crotch. He turns it slightly to the right. At this spot he applies pressure with the hand to his center’s tail. The left hand must be in a comfortable position, making slight contact with the right hand, and it is used to trap the ball and to assist the right hand in taking the football from the center.

Halfback’s Stance

The feet of the halfback should not be wider than the shoulders, and staggered in a heel to toe relationship with each other. The weight should be on the balls of the feet, but will vary slightly depending upon the direction the halfback must move in carrying out his particular assignment. With the snap of the ball he should throw himself in the direction he is going, and he should not use a crossover step.

His knees should be bent a little beyond 90 degrees, with the knees and heels turned slightly in, and the tail a little higher than the

shoulders. The halfback’s shoulders should be square, with his head and eyes in a position to see the defensive linebacker on the opposite side from him. The inside hand should be down, slightly forward and inside of the knee with the thumb turned a little to the inside. The body weight should be forward slightly.

Fullback’s Stance

The fullback lines up with the feet even and a little wider than his shoulders. The cleats on the heels of his shoes should touch the ground. The heels and knees are turned slightly in with the weight on the balls of the feet. The head and eyes are in a relaxed position, but where they can see the second man standing outside of the offensive end. The hands are directly in front of each foot with the thumbs turned in. The shoulders are square, the back is straight, the tail is directly above the heels, with the weight slightly forward, but not to such an extent he cannot start quickly in a lateral direction to either side.

OFFENSIVE LINE SPLITS

The use of intelligent line splits by the offensive guards, tackles and ends must be mastered in order to realize the full potential of our basic offensive attack. Without proper line splits, it is impossible for the offense to function at 100% efficiency. Therefore, we must present line split theory and coach our linemen in such a way they will have a clear understanding of why and when we want to move in, out or remain stationary. Mastering the intelligent use of line splits is one of the most important single duties of the offensive linemen. (The other is a quick offensive charge together on the starting count.)

The Pre-Shift Position

When the linemen leave the huddle and come up to the line of scrimmage in a pre-shift position (hands on knees in a semi-upright

stance), the basic split rule for the guards is to split one full man. The tackles and ends will split slightly more than one full man. As the linemen go down into their offensive stance, each man (except the center) will move in, out or remain stationary, depending upon the particular defensive alignment and the individual’s split rules.

Our Basic Split Rules

Our offensive basic split rules are as follows:

E D:

1. Guards—full man; don’t move.

2. Tackles—man over you, split one-half man. If no one is there, use a common sense split which would be to cut the split down on a wide play and take a maximum split on an inside play.

3. Ends—Line up a little over a full man split, and use the common sense split rule which would depend upon the play. Never move more than one-half man either way.

O D:

1. Guards—Take a full man split, but never so wide that if a man should jump into the gap between the guard and center, you could not cut him off. After taking the proper split, then apply the common sense split rule.

2. Tackles—If there is no inside linebacker:

(a) Wide play called—split in one-half man.

(b) Inside play called—fake split and don’t move. Inside linebacker: Split out one-half man.

3. Ends—Take good wide splits and apply common sense rule, never split more than one-half man either way.

In order to split intelligently it is important to determine first of all if the defensive man will move with you when you move (Figure 99a), or whether he is keeping his spacing on his own defensive man (Figure 99b). You are attempting to determine as quickly as possible if your defensive man is taking a variable or a static position. Figures 99a-b illustrate variable and static spacing, respectively, by the defensive linemen.

F 99b

Do not ever emphasize that you are splitting to get good blocking angles, but you split in order to isolate a defender. If the defender splits when the offensive man splits, you can isolate him. If his split is static, a good blocking angle will be the result. Your linemen should never split merely to get the angle, however. It will also help the linemen if they have a clear picture of where the ball crosses the line of scrimmage (the critical point of attack), and from where the ball is being thrown on a pass play. Then, too, there is no set rule that will cover all defensive situations and the offensive men must be able to apply the common sense split rule along with the basic split rule.

F 99a

Figure 100 illustrates the pre-shift position of the right side of the offensive line and the application of the guard’s, tackle’s, and end’s split rules. From the pre-shift stance and position, the offensive men are allowed to split one-half man either way, according to the defense. The inside always must be protected. A defensive man must not be allowed to penetrate or shoot the inside gap as he is likely to stop the offensive play for a loss.

F 100

If the defensive man will move with the offensive man, then the offense should be able to isolate one man and the point of attack should be directed toward him. Figures 101a-b illustrate the center’s man and the offensive right tackle’s man being isolated respectively, and the critical point of attack being directed at the isolated defenders.

It is very important for the offensive lineman to know his main objective in proper line splitting is either (1) to spread the defense out, or (2) to isolate a man. The main objective is never to split in order to get a good blocking angle. This latter misconception can destroy any advantage we gain by splitting the line.

OUR SNAP COUNT

F 101a
F 101b

In order for a team to operate at maximum efficiency offensively all of the players must get off with the ball at the same time. They must uncoil as a unit and strike the opposition as quickly as possible. The only advantage the offense has over the defense is the former knows where the play is going and when the ball will be snapped. In order to maintain this advantage the offense must strike quickly as a unit. Should the defense penetrate the offense or the offense not get off on the ball together, the offense loses its advantage over the defense.

The offense’s advantage hinges on its ability to get off on the ball together. Whether or not the offense can do this well will depend upon their first initial movement, which in turn depends upon the snap count.

At one time or another I believe we have used just about every imaginable snap count. We have found that our line gets off better as a unit, without leaning, and hits quicker when we employ a sound snap count. The quarterback can say what he likes if we are going on the first sound. While in the huddle, the quarterback will give the play and then cue the action with the first sound, second sound or the third sound. We use the same word for our sound snap count, but the emphasis is placed on the first, second or third sound. For example, if the quarterback calls, “24 on the second sound,” the team lines up in its offensive position, and the quarterback says, “Go!” Since this is the first sound, the ball is not centered. Then the quarterback commands, “Go!” for the second sound, the ball is centered and the team moves as a unit. The quarterback can wait between his first and second commands since our snap count is non-rhythmic. Such a measure not only keeps the defense off guard, but it also keeps the offense constantly alert.

Automatics

It is not my purpose to discuss the automatic versus the nonautomatic systems of signal calling. In the former the quarterback can use the automatic system or change the play at the line of scrimmage. In the latter he runs the play that was called in the

huddle and does not change it at the line of scrimmage. There are advantages and disadvantages to both systems. A strong argument that is advanced for the non-automatic system is that it gives the linemen time to analyze their block and mentally pick out the person they are supposed to block as they approach the line of scrimmage. The people who favor the non-automatic system maintain they have fewer broken signals, and fewer bad plays than the teams using the automatic play change.

While I am not stressing the merits of one system over the other, frankly, I would never send my players into a football game without several plays which could be automaticked at the line of scrimmage. It is just common sense to realize certain plays are not good against certain defenses, and it is useless in most instances to run a play directly toward the strength of a defense when you need to gain yardage in order to sustain your offensive drive. Therefore, we always have a trap play, an end sweep, and a look pass as our automatics. Since they are few in number, our automatics are easy to learn and they allow the quarterback to change his play at the line of scrimmage if he wishes to do so.

Our automatic system is very simple, and there is very little confusion when we change our plays. As an example, while we are in the huddle, the quarterback will call play, “18,” and the players will break from the huddle and go to the line of scrimmage. After the quarterback gets the players down into their offensive positions and he sees he wants to change the play on automatic, he will repeat the original play, “18.” This will alert the players, and they know the next number they hear will be the new play that will be run instead of play 18. After the quarterback has repeated the original play, and has called another number, “24,” as an example, everyone on the offensive team knows the new play will be 24, and the snap count always remains the same.

Faking the Automatic

If the quarterback wishes to fake an automatic so the opponents cannot catch on to what he is doing, this can be done very simply. As

an example, let’s say the quarterback called the play, “30,” in the huddle. At the line of scrimmage he decided to fake or dummy the automatic. At the line he will say any number other than the one he called in the huddle. This notifies the boys it is a fake automatic and they will not pay any attention to the next number he calls as they are going to run the play which the quarterback called originally in the huddle.

By using this two number system we can always play the automatic or fake it, and it is impossible for the opponents to catch on because they do not know the play the quarterback called in the huddle originally. It is impossible to use the automatic if the quarterback has elected to run the play on the first sound. The majority of the time when we are going on the first sound we will be hitting fast and straight away, and an automatic will not be necessary. If the quarterback thinks there is any chance he might want to change the play for any particular reason, he would not run the play on the first sound.

THE OFFENSIVE HUDDLE

The entire offensive operation starts with the huddle; therefore, it is very important to insist that proper huddle techniques are carried out properly. It is not too important the way the men are spaced or lined up in forming the huddle, as long as everyone can see, hear, and get to their proper offensive positions with as little confusion as possible. It is a must, however, for the quarterback to use the proper techniques in calling his plays and in controlling the huddle.

The Quarterback Controls the Team

A quarterback should never allow any talking in the huddle, unless he asks a question and wants specific information. Therefore, he should stand out of the huddle until it is completely formed. This will give any player an opportunity to come and give specific information to the quarterback without talking in the huddle.

The quarterback should not just call a signal, but on certain occasions he should make a few extra comments while in the huddle. He should be forceful, and above all he must be confident. The team will run the play the way the quarterback calls it. Occasionally he should single out the man called on to make the key block and inform him the team is depending upon him. After the quarterback has called the play, and someone wants to check the signal, the quarterback should not merely repeat the signal but the entire play over again.

The quarterback must know the tactical situation at all times. If a substitute comes into the game, the quarterback should always ask if there are any instructions from the coach. The quarterback must always be conscious of the 25 seconds between plays, and he should use it to his advantage, whether to speed up or slow down the game. Training the quarterback will be discussed in greater detail in Chapter 9.

THE QUARTERBACK’S TECHNIQUES

I spoke previously of the quarterback’s stance. It is very important for him to take the same stance every time. The center must know where to place the ball every time. Centers and quarterbacks should work with each other frequently giving them as much practice as possible. Each center or quarterback has particular traits, and by the centers and quarterbacks working with each other they get to know one another better, thus eliminating bad exchanges between them.

The quarterback should have his head up and always look straight ahead, while observing the defense at all times. He should be as comfortable and as relaxed as possible, and he should never look down when receiving the ball from his center.

Taking the Snap-Back

On the snap of the ball, the quarterback should dip his hips so his hands will follow the tail of the center as he charges. This technique

will also help the quarterback push off. The quarterback will take the ball with his right hand, using the left as a trapper, as was explained previously. He should make certain he has the ball, and he should not fight it, before withdrawing his hands from the center’s crotch. As soon as the quarterback has possession of the ball, he should bring it into his “third hand,” his stomach. Such a procedure will help prevent a fumble. He then wants to push off and execute his techniques as quickly as possible.

The quarterback must always be cognizant of the fact he cannot score without the ball; consequently, he wants to make certain he has possession of it before pulling out of there. If he gets in a big hurry, he is likely to drop the ball to the ground. I have seen this occur many times.

After Receiving the Snap

After receiving the snap, the quarterback will operate in one direction or the other by using a pivot or a cross-over step. The theory and techniques are basically the same.

First, the quarterback must know the defensive alignment as this will determine how far he should pivot, or if he needs to take a position step. After he has recognized the defense and he has taken the first short jab step or pivot step, he should have the ball in close to his body until he is ready to hand-off.

The head is the first part of the body around if using the pivot step, and also the first to move in the direction the quarterback is taking if the cross-over step is used. After the head is pointed in the right direction, the steps can be adjusted to avoid running into the ball carrier. The quarterback should not wave his arms or his body up and down as he should maintain the same level throughout the entire operation. The quarterback should never flash (show) the football; he always operates under control.

Making the Exchange

It is important for the quarterback to know each man with whom he must make an exchange, including his speed, strong and weak points. He should look at the target, the far hip, of the man to whom he is going to hand the football, and he should be very quick with the exchange. He should try to make the hand-off with the same motion he would use if he were dealing cards quickly.

Quarterback Faking

The faking of the quarterback is very important. He should always remember to carry out his fakes realistically. Incidentally we sometimes give the ball to the man who is supposed to be doing the faking. We have found it helps our faking as the man is not certain whether or not the quarterback is going to give the ball to him.

When attempting a fake, it is very important for the quarterback to look at the man he is faking to, and not merely swing his arms in a half-hearted fake. He should go through the same motions he uses when he actually gives the ball to the faker. His fakes must be realistic for the offense to be effective. The quarterback should remember he never stops moving while on offense, except when faking to set up a drop back pass.

BALL CARRYING TECHNIQUES

Every team wins or loses a great percentage of its games due to the manner in which the backs and ends carry the football. All players, not only the backs, should be drilled in the proper mechanics and techniques of carrying a football properly as it is possible on occasions an interior lineman will have an opportunity to run with the ball.

The outstanding characteristics or strength of each ball carrier is likely to be different as one might possess outstanding speed, another is a nifty, shifty runner, and the third is solid on his feet, possesses power, and is capable of running over the opposition. Every ball carrier must utilize his natural talents, and should practice

diligently to become as versatile as possible. Regardless of the individual style of a runner, the most important point is for him to hold on to the football and not fumble it.

Good habits, careful handling, and the execution of proper techniques will prevent fumbles on ball exchanges. When a player has the ball in his possession and fumbles it, he has committed the unpardonable sin in my estimation. The ball carrier should remember to have one point of the football in the palm of his hand with the fingers around the end of the ball, and gripping it tightly. The other end should be in the crook of his arm, which should force the football up close to his body.

If the football is carried properly, and the ball carrier is determined to hang on to it, the football should never be lost due to a fumble. The ball is the most valuable object on the football field. Consequently if the ball carrier fails to hang on to the ball, he is letting down his entire team. Once a player has control of the ball and fumbles it, this is no accident. It is either carelessness or lack of courage. I can’t build a winner with this type of player. In a close game a fumbled ball can be the deciding factor in winning or losing.

A ball carrier should remember his primary objective is to gain ground; if possible, to score Therefore, he should move directly toward the opposition’s goal line as quickly as possible, unless there is a definite reason for doing otherwise. There are always exceptions to the rules, and a ball carrier may not be running toward the opposition’s goal because he might be trying to make better use of a blocker, dodge an opponent, get to the opening, time the play properly, or he might have some other valid reason. There will be times when top speed and the correct direction will not be sufficient to get the job done.

Open Field Running Techniques

When a ball carrier is in the open field, he should always keep the tackler guessing. He should not tip-off whether he is going to try to outrun him, run through him, or dodge him, until he is close enough

to the tackler to give him the fake and then get by him. The ball carrier should never concede he is down, and he should always keep fighting to gain ground until the whistle stops the play.

The ball carrier should always realize and know exactly where he is on the field, and just what he must do in order for the play to be successful. In a majority of cases, a ball carrier should be concerned only with running for a touchdown.

The Importance of Proper Mental Attitude

The basic difference between ordinary and great athletes is mental attitude. As far as football players are concerned, the ordinary ball carrier will try to make a touchdown, but he will be satisfied with a five or six yard gain. The champion athlete, the All-American back, is dissatisfied when he fails to score. He is always going for the opposition’s goal line. The ball carrier actually does not succeed in his objective unless he runs for a touchdown on every play (except for occasional tactical situations), and he should never be made to feel he has accomplished his objective unless he scores.

A ball carrier must be made to realize when he does a poor job of carrying the ball, the effort of the other 10 men has been wasted. The ball carrier must always be aware of the yardage necessary for a first down and for a touchdown. When the ball carrier has possession of the football, he must realize he has the control of the game in his hands.

OUR BLOCKING TECHNIQUES

Blocking techniques are basically the same for all linemen. The blocks the backs are called upon to execute are basically the same, too. Therefore, we will not discuss the techniques of each position, but merely discuss techniques and procedures as a whole.

The Drive Block

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.