Long cases in clinical medicine concerned with long cases their presentation related questions answe
Long Cases in Clinical Medicine Concerned With Long Cases Their Presentation Related Questions Answers and
Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://textbookfull.com/product/long-cases-in-clinical-medicine-concerned-with-long-c ases-their-presentation-related-questions-answers-and-discussions-1st-edition-a-b-m -abdullah/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...
Long Cases in Clinical Medicine For the Final MBBS 1st Edition Senaka Rajapakse
(Concerned with long cases, their presentation, related questions, answers and discussions)
aBM abdullah mrcp (uk) frcp (edin)
Dean, Faculty of Medicine
Professor, Department of Medicine
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Dhaka, Bangladesh
Foreword Pran gopal datta
JAYPEE BROTHERS MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (P) LTD
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd
Headquarters
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd
4838/24, Ansari Road, Daryaganj
New Delhi 110 002, India
Phone: +91-11-43574357
Fax: +91-11-43574314
Email: jaypee@jaypeebrothers.com
Overseas Offices
J.P. Medical Ltd
Jaypee-Highlights Medical Publishers Inc. 83, Victoria Street, London City of Knowledge, Bld. 237, Clayton
SW1H 0HW (UK)
Phone: +44-2031708910
Fax: +02-03-0086180
Email: info@jpmedpub.com
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd
Panama City, Panama
Phone: + 507-301-0496
Fax: + 507-301-0499
Email: cservice@jphmedical.com
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd
The Bourse 17/1-B Babar Road, Block-B, Shaymali 111 South Independence Mall East Mohammadpur, Dhaka-1207 Suite 835, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA Bangladesh
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the prior permission of the publisher.
Inquiries for bulk sales may be solicited at: jaypee@jaypeebrothers.com
This book has been published in good faith that the contents provided by the author contained herein are original, and is intended for educational purposes only. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of information, the publisher and the author specifically disclaim any damage, liability, or loss incurred, directly or indirectly, from the use or application of any of the contents of this work. UnitedVRG, If not specifically stated, all figures and tables are courtesy of the author. Where appropriate, the readers should consult with a specialist or contact the manufacturer of the drug or device.
Long Cases in Clinical Medicine
First Edition: 2013
ISBN 978-93-5090-502-9
Printed at
“He who studies medicine without books sails an uncharted sea, but he who studies medicine without patients does not go to sea at all.”
sir William osler
dedicated to My Parents, Wife and Children
Foreword
This is my pleasure and great honor to write a few words about Long Cases in Clinical Medicine. Professor Abdullah has written an excellent “made easy” book that will help both undergraduate and postgraduate students prepare themselves in a systematic manner. It is easy to understand, concise, and will help to learn many aspects of medicine. This will reflect the diseases of the region. Medicine is a vast subject and ever-changing science, expanding and progressing day by day. New information is emerging all the time, making the textbooks bigger and harder to assimilate. Textbooks are a good source of knowledge, but many students, in spite of hours of tedious work, are often unable to acquire all the necessary information in a concise way.
Dr Abdullah has admirably succeeded in fulfilling this gap by preparing such a book in a concise and methodical way. This book is certainly the first of its kind to fulfill the long demand of students and doctors. I have no doubt that this book will be of immense benefit for the students who are appearing in any postgraduate and undergraduate examination in clinical medicine. This book has an excellent outline regarding presentation of long cases, answers of relevant questions and a brief discussion.
When I was a new student in clinical medicine, I found it difficult while talking to the patient, taking the history, physical examination, coming to the diagnosis, etc. I think every new student in clinical medicine used to feel the same problem. There is no book or clinical methods that will fill these difficulties. In that respect, I strongly appreciate and feel that this book will really be a good guide, written in a concise and rational manner that will greatly help the undergraduate students to establish the foundation of clinical medicine with ease and confidence.
I heartily appreciate and praise the author’s effort, hard work, sincere endeavor, enthusiasm and patience in bringing out this book in a beautifully designed way for the benefit of the learners in medicine.
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University Dhaka, Bangladesh
Preface
By the good grace of Almighty, I have succeeded to bring out the first edition of Long Cases in Clinical Medicine.
Long cases are an integral part of any examination in medicine. The idea is to assess the candidate’s ability of gathering adequate information from thorough medical history and physical examination, interpreting them to come up with a probable diagnosis and formulating a management plan. A sound knowledge of medical science, optimum clinical skills, good interpersonal communication and adequate time management are all needed. A good preparation and adequate practice are vital for success.
From my experience as a teacher and an examiner in medicine, I feel that many candidates, even brilliant ones, fail to succeed in long cases due to lack of adequate technique of taking history from the patient, analysis of symptoms, inapt presentation and inability to answer questions related to the case. In spite of good theoretical knowledge, many of them are unable to effectively communicate with the patient. This is because they do not prepare themselves in an examinationoriented manner. It is important to acquire knowledge from textbooks, but it is equally vital to know what to expect in examinations, how to face them and to practice with that in mind. Goalbased preparation, systematic practice and repeated exposure to different cases and rehearsal of presentation in front of others is the secret to success. With this in mind, I have written this book to help students prepare themselves in an examination-oriented manner.
This book has been written to entertain a wide variety of readers from medical students to postgraduate examinees. It includes a complete outline of a comprehensive medical encounter including history taking and physical examination. It also gives valuable tips regarding interpretation of various clinical features to make a diagnosis. Successive chapters include long cases arranged according to body systems. In each case, the history and examination is presented first followed by the clinical diagnosis and possible differentials. Then the relevant questions and answers are provided.
The best way to get the most out of this book would be to practice a real case in the ward and then go through the relevant example given in the book. Students should notice how the case has been presented, the important clinical points that are mentioned and then familiarize themselves with the relevant questions and answers. They can make small groups where one will present a case in front of others and then answer questions asked by them. This will help them to be confident and fluent during the real examination.
In examination, a patient may have a single disease, or may be suffering from multiple diseases. For the purpose of preparation and simplicity, I have prepared this book using a prototype single case of a disease condition.
x I do not claim that this book is enough for the whole clinical medicine and one should consult standard textbooks for learning. But for examination purpose, this book will be a valuable tool for optimum preparation.
A candidate needs to prove that he is not only knowledgeable but also competent. I hope that this book will help to promote such an approach.
I would like to invite constructive criticism from valued readers of this book, so that any error or omission may be corrected in future edition.
acknowledgments
I would like to take the opportunity to extend my sincere gratitude to Professor Pran gopal datta MCPS, ACORL (Odessa), PhD (Kiev), MSc in Audiology (UK), FCPS, FRCS (Glasgow-UK), ViceChancellor, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, for his encouragement and valuable suggestions in preparing this book.
I am also highly grateful to Dr Ahmed-al-Muntasir-Niloy for the computer composing and graphic designing of the entire book. He has also gone through the whole manuscript and made necessary corrections and modifications. I can, without any hesitation, mention that he has worked as the co-author.
I must acknowledge the contributions of my colleagues, doctors and students who were kind enough to help me in writing such a book of its kind. They are always a source of my inspiration and encouragement.
Y Professor MN Alam MRCP (Glasgow), FRCP (Glasgow), FCPS
Y Professor Tofayel Ahmed FCPS (BD), FCPS (Pak), FACP, FCCP, MRCP, FRCP (Edin, Glasgow and Ireland)
Y Professor MU Kabir Chowdhury FRCP (Glasgow), DDV
Y Professor Quazi Deen Mohammad MD (Neuro), FCPS
Y Professor Taimur AK Mahmud MCPS, FCPS
Y Professor Mohammad Gofranul Haque FCPS
Y Professor Chandanendu B Sarker FCPS, MD
Y Professor Mohammad Abdul Mannan MD (EM), MCPS (Medicine), PhD (Endocrine)
Y Professor Masuda Begum FCPS (Hematology)
Y Professor Mohammad Farid Uddin DEM, MD (EM)
Y Professor Akhtarun Naher M Phil (Microbiology), WHO (Fellow)
Y Dr Asia Khanam MD (Nephrology)
Y Dr Tahmida Hassan DDV, MD (Dermatology)
Y Dr ATM Asaduzzaman MD (Dermatology)
Y Dr AKM Motiur Rahman Bhuiyan MPH, MD (Internal Medicine)
Y Dr Tazin Afrose Shah FCPS
Y Dr Shagufa Anwar MBBS, MBA, Postgraduate Diploma in Health Care Management
Y Dr Nusrat Sultana FCPS (Medicine)
Y Dr Mohammad Razibul Alam, MBBS, MD (Gastroenterology)
Y Dr Mohammad Mahbubul Alam (Prince), MD (Hepatology)
Y Dr Mohammad Abul Kalam Azad, FCPS (Medicine)
Y Dr Shahnoor Sarmin MCPS, FCPS, MD (Cardiology)
Y Dr Lima Asrin Sayami FCPS (Cardiology)
Y Dr Meera Momtaz Sabeka MPH (Melbourne), MD (Neurology)
Y Dr Ayesha Rafiq Chowdhury FCPS (Medicine), MD (Cardiology)
Y Dr Bakhtiar Mohammad Shoeb FCPS (Medicine), MD (Nephrology)
xii
Y Dr Omar Serajul Hasan MD (USA)
Y Dr Tanjim Sultana MD (USA)
Y Dr Mohammad Asadur Rahman MD (Gastroenterology)
Y Dr Samprity Islam MBBS
Y Dr Monirul Islam Khan MBBS
Y Dr Nazma Azim Daizy MBBS
Y Dr Ahmed-al-Muntasir-Niloy MBBS
Y Dr Faiza Mukarrama MBBS
Y Dr Sadia Sabah MBBS
Y Dr Sadi Abdullah MBBS
My special thanks to Shri Jitendar P Vij (Group Chairman), Mr Ankit Vij (Managing Director) and Mr Tarun Duneja (Director-Publishing), and other staff of M/s Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd, New Delhi, India, for their untiring endeavor and hard work, which made it possible for “painless delivery” of this book. They have also notably enhanced the physical quality of the book making it beautiful and attractive.
I must be grateful to my students who were repeatedly encouraging and demanding to write such a book.
Last but not least, I must express that no amount of appreciation is sufficient for my wife and children, whose untiring support and sacrifice has made it possible to bring such a book in the light of the day.
Contents
“The good physician treats the disease; the great physician treats the patient who has the disease.”
sir William osler
Chapter 1 Proforma of a Long Case 1
Brief Discussion and Elaboration about Physical Examination 12
How to approach a long case 23
How to Proceed with a long case 26
Systemic Inquiry 29
Description (or Elaboration) of Symptoms 32
Chapter 2 Respiratory system 57
Bronchial asthma 59
chronic Bronchitis 72
chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 77
chronic Bronchitis with Emphysema 84
chronic Bronchitis with cor Pulmonale 89
Bronchiectasis 94
Pleural Effusion (tubercular) 99
lung abscess 109
Bronchial carcinoma 114
consolidation 123
Pneumothorax 132
collapse of the lung 139
Superior Vena cava Obstruction 143
Diffuse Parenchymal lung Disease 147
cystic Fibrosis 154
Chapter 3 Cardiovascular system 159
Mitral Stenosis 162
Mitral regurgitation 175
Mixed Mitral Stenosis with Mitral regurgitation 181
aortic Stenosis 183
aortic regurgitation 189
Mixed aortic Stenosis and regurgitation 196
congestive cardiac Failure with Valvular lesion 199
Hypertension 208
Subacute Bacterial Endocarditis 217
rheumatic Fever 224
Eisenmenger’s Syndrome 231
tetralogy of Fallot 235
Ventricular Septal Defect 240
atrial Septal Defect 244
Patent Ductus ar teriosus 248
coarctation of aorta 252
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 257
Chapter 4 gastroenterology
chronic Duodenal Ulcer 263
chronic Duodenal Ulcer with Pyloric Stenosis 271 carcinoma of the Stomach 274
carcinoma Head of the Pancreas 279
Inflammatory Bowel Disease 283
Ileocecal tuberculosis 293 carcinoma of colon 296
Chapter 5 Hepatobiliary system
Obstructive Jaundice 305
acute Viral Hepatitis 311
chronic liver Disease (cirrhosis of liver) 320
liver abscess 338
Primary Biliary cirrhosis 343
Hepatoma 348
Secondaries in the liver 353
Hemochromatosis 356
Budd-chiari Syndrome 361
261
303
Chapter 6 nephrology 365
Nephrotic Syndrome 367
Post-Streptococcal Glomerulonephritis 374
Polycystic Kidney Disease 379
chronic Kidney Disease (Diabetic Nephropathy) 384
Hypertension with chronic Kidney Disease 396
lupus Nephritis 401
Pyrexia of Unknown Origin in Hemodialysis Patient 404
“Observe, record, tabulate, communicate. Use your five senses. Learn to see, learn to hear, learn to feel, learn to smell, and know that by practice alone you can become expert.” —Sir William Osler
Brief discussion and elaboration about Physical examination 12
How to approach a Long Case 23
How to Proceed with a Long Case 26
Systemic Inquiry 29
description (or elaboration) of Symptoms 32
HISTORY OF THe PaTIeNT
Y Name, age, sex, address, marital status, occupation, religion
Y Date of admission
Y Date of examination
Y Chief complaints (in chronological order, from longest to shortest duration)
Y History of present illness
Y History of past illness (including any operation)
Y Family history
Y Personal history
Y Socioeconomic history
Y Psychiatric history
Y Drug and treatment history
Y History of allergy (to drugs, diet or anything else, skin rash associated with allergy, treatment taken for allergy)
Y History of immunization
Y Menstrual and obstetric history (in female)
Y Other history – Travelling to other places or abroad, working abroad (may be related to hepatitis B, HIV, etc.), contact with TB patient (mention, if relevant).
PHYSIC aL eXaMINaTION (INCLudeS geNeRaL aNd SYSTeMIC eXaMINaTION)
general examination
Y Appearance
Y Build
Y Nutrition
Y Decubitus
Y Cooperation
Y Anemia
Y Jaundice
Y Cyanosis
Y Clubbing
Y Koilonychia
Y Leukonychia
Y edema
Y Dehydration
Y Bony tenderness
Y Pigmentation
Y Lymph nodes
Y Thyroid gland
Y Breasts
Y Body hair
Y Pulse
Y Blood pressure
Y Temperature
Y Respiration
Y Others (if relevant) – Neck, axilla, head (alopecia, large or small). Skin lesion (if any, such as butterfly rash in face, rash in body, scratch mark).
Systemic examination
Cardiovascular System
1. Pulse: x Rate x Rhythm x Volume x Character x Condition of the vessel wall x Radio-femoral delay x Radio-radial delay
Precordium (Sequentially—Inspection, Palpation, Percussion and Auscultation)
Inspection:
Y Any deformity of the chest
Y Visible cardiac impulse
Y Other impulses (epigastric, suprasternal, supraclavicular or other impulse)
Y Any scar mark (midsternal or thoracotomy)
Y Pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator box (mention, if any).
Palpation:
1. Apex beat: x Site (that intercostal space) x Distance from midline (in cm) x Nature (normal, tapping, heaving, thrusting, diffuse or double apex).
2. Thrill:
x Site (that intercostal space, apical or basal or other site) x Nature (systolic or diastolic or both).
3. Left parasternal heave
4. Palpable P2
5. epigastric pulsation.
Percussion:
Y Area of cardiac dullness (Not a routine. However, it is important to diagnose pericardial effusion, where area of cardiac dullness is increased and in emphysema, where area of cardiac dullness is obliterated).
Auscultation:
1. 1st and 2nd heart sounds
2. Other heart sounds (3rd and 4th)
3. Murmur:
x Site
x Nature (systolic, diastolic or both)
x Radiation (towards left axilla or neck)
x Relation with respiration, posture (in left lateral position with breathing hold after expiration or bending forward with breathing hold after expiration)
5. Auscultate back of the chest (to see bilateral basal crepitations in pulmonary edema).
Respiratory System
examination of the chest (systematically—inspection, palpation, percussion and auscultation).
Inspection:
Y Shape of the chest
Y Deformity (flattening of the chest, kyphosis, scoliosis, etc.)
Y Drooping of the shoulder
Y Movement of the chest
Y Intercostal space (indrawing or fullness)
Y Visible impulse
Y Visible or engorged vein (if present, see flow)
Y Others (scar marks, suprasternal and supraclavicular excavation, prominent accessory muscles, gynecomastia, needle puncture mark, tattooing, radiation mark).
Palpation:
Y Position of trachea
Y Apex beat
Y Chest expansion
Y Chest movement (symmetrical or asymmetrical)
Y Tracheal tug
Y Cricosternal distance
Y Vocal fremitus
Y Local rib tenderness.
Percussion:
Y Percussion note
Y Liver dullness
Y Area of cardiac dullness (not done routinely, only if emphysema is suspected).
Auscultation:
Y Breath sound
Y Vocal resonance
Y Added sounds (rhonchi, crepitations, pleural rub, post-tussive crepitations).
Note
Always examine the back of the chest, systematically.
Gastrointestinal System
(Always start examining from mouth and pharynx, then abdomen).
Mouth and pharynx:
Y Lips
Y Teeth and gum
Y Oral mucous membrane
Y Tongue
Y Palate and movement of soft palate
Y Tonsils
Y Fauces.
Note
Look for pigmentation, white patch, ulceration.
Abdomen (Examine Systematically—Inspection, Palpation, Percussion and Auscultation)
Inspection:
Y Shape of the abdomen
Y Flanks
Y Movement with respiration
Y Visible peristalsis
Y Visible pulsation
Y Umbilicus
Y Engorged veins (if present, see the direction of flow both above and below the umbilicus)
Y Striae
Y Any scar mark
Y Pigmentation
Y Swelling or mass (tell the site)
Y Campbell de Morgan’s spot
Y Groin, pubic hair and genitalia (with permission of the patient)
Y Cough impulse.
Palpation:
Y Superficial palpation and local temperature
Y Deep palpation (tenderness, rigidity, mass)
Y Liver:
x Size (in cm)
x Margin
x Surface
x Tenderness
x Consistency
x Upper border of the liver dullness
x Auscultation (to see bruit or rub).
Y Spleen (size in cm)
Y Kidneys
Y Gallbladder (if palpable, mention the size, tenderness, consistency, surface, margin)
Y Fluid thrill (if ascites is suspected)
Y Any mass (if present, first see whether it is intra-abdominal or extra-abdominal). Then see the following points:
x Site
x Size
x Shape
x Surface
x Consistency
x Tenderness
x Mobility
x Others: (whether pulsatile, feel for get above the swelling).
Y Para-aortic lymph nodes
Y Hernial orifice
Y Testis (with permission of the patient)
Y Per-rectal examination (though it is a part of physical examination, usually it is never done in an examination setting).
Percussion:
Y Liver dullness
Y Splenic dullness
Y Shifting dullness (if ascites is suspected or present).
Auscultation:
Y Bowel sounds
Y Hepatic bruit or rub
Y Renal bruit
Y Bruit of aortic aneurysm
Y Splenic rub
Y Venous hum.
Nervous System
Higher Psychic Functions (HPF):
Y Appearance
Y Behavior
Y Consciousness
Y Memory
Y Intelligence
Y Orientation of time, space and person
Y emotional state
Y Hallucination
Y Delusion
Y Speech.
Motor functions:
Y Bulk of the muscle
Y Tone of the muscle
Y Power of the muscle
Y Fasciculation
Y Involuntary movement (mention the type, e.g. tremor, chorea, athetosis, hemiballismus, etc.)
Y Coordination test:
x Finger nose test
x Heel shin test
x Romberg’s sign
Y Gait and posture.
Reflexes (Superficial and deep)
Superficial reflexes:
Y Plantar reflex
Y Abdominal reflex
Y Corneal reflex
Y Palatal reflex
Y Cremasteric reflex.
Deep reflexes:
Clonus:
Y Ankle
Y Patellar.
Others: Gordon’s sign and Oppenheim’s sign (both in leg) and Hoffman’s sign.
Sensory functions:
Y Pain
Y Touch
Y Temperature
Y Position sense
Y Sense of vibration
Y Tactile localization
Y Tactile discrimination
Y Recognition of size and shape, weight and form of object
Y Romberg’s sign.
Signs of meningeal irritation:
Y Neck rigidity
Y Kernig’s sign
Y Brudzinski’s sign.
Examination of cranial nerves:
Y Olfactory nerve (sense of smell or hallucination of smell)
Side BicepsTricepsSupinatorKnee
Ankle
Right Left
Y Optic nerve:
x Visual acuity
x Field of vision
x Color vision
x Light reflex (direct and consensual)
x Fundoscopy (see last)
Y Oculomotor, trochlear and abducent nerve:
x Ptosis
x Squint
x Ocular movements
x Diplopia
x Nystagmus
x Pupils (size, shape, light reflex)
x Accommodation reflex.
Y Trigeminal nerve:
x Motor
x Sensory
x Corneal reflex.
Y Facial nerve (both sensory and motor)
Y Vestibulocochlear nerve: (ask about any hearing abnormality, vertigo or dizziness or giddiness).
x Look at the external auditory meatus (for any wax, rash)
x Rinne’s test and Weber’s test.
Y Glossopharyngeal and vagus nerve:
x Look for nasal voice, nasal regurgitation, hoarseness of voice, bovine cough
x Movement of palate
x Gag reflex
x Taste sensation (in posterior 1/3 of tongue).
Y Accessory nerve (spinal part): see the action of sternomastoid and trapezius
Y Hypoglossal nerve (look at the tongue and see):
x Wasting
x Fasciculation
x Movement of tongue.
Locomotor System
Bones:
Y Shape
Y Swelling
Y Tenderness
Y Deformity
Y Sinus.
Joints:
Y Inspection:
x Swelling, local muscle wasting (unilateral or bilateral), any deformity
x Redness
x Skin change (psoriatic patch).
Y Palpation:
x Temperature
x Tenderness
x Dry or moist
x Fluctuation
x Crepitus.
Y Movement:
x Observe the range of active movement while gently palpating the joint for abnormal clicks or crepitus
x If restricted, gently perform passive movement and check for crepitus
x Perform passive stretching maneuvers to detect joint instability or ligament injury (when appropriate).
Spine:
Y Look for any kyphosis, scoliosis, lordosis
Y Any swelling of vertebral column (local swelling, Gibbus)
Y Tenderness of vertebral column
Y Movement of vertebrae (perform Schober’s test, if appropriate).
Examination of nerve root compression:
Y Straight leg raise: With the patient lying supine, flex the hip with legs extended. Normally, up to 90° hip flexion is possible. But when there is root compression, it will be restricted (patient will feel pain in the lumbar region)
Lasegue’s sign: With the knee flexed, flex the hip up to 90°. Now gently extend the knee. The patient will feel pain.
Sacroiliac joint examination:
Y With the patient in prone position, apply firm pressure over the sacrum with the hand
Y With the patient lying on his side, press down on the pelvic brim.
Others (according to suspicion of cause, examine the individual joint accordingly. For example, in case of rheumatoid arthritis, examine the joints of hands, wrist, feet, etc.).
Genitourinary System
Inspection:
Y Scar (nephrectomy)
Y Scar of transplanted kidney in the right or left iliac fossa
Y Visible mass (including mass of transplanted kidney)
Y Small scar of dialysis
Y Abdominal distension
Y Inspection of scrotum for mass or swelling or edema and penis (with permission of the patient).
Palpation:
Y Renal angle
Y Kidneys
Y Urinary bladder.
Percussion:
Y Bladder.
Auscultation:
Y Renal bruit.
After completing all of the above, proceed as follows:
Bedside investigations (if applicable):
Y Urine for sugar (If diabetes mellitus)
Y Urine for albumin (If nephrotic syndrome)
Salient features (Present in the following manner – mentioning the name, age, hailing from, smoker or nonsmoker, diabetic or nondiabetic, hypertensive or nonhypertensive, etc. One example is given below):
Mr. X, a 50-year-old businessman, smoker, nondiabetic, nonhypertensive, hailing from … was admitted in the hospital (or presented) with the complaints of:
1. … days/months
2. … days/months
3. … days/months
Then summarize the history of present illness, past history, social and other history with important negative points in the history.
On general examination—mention the important positive and important negative findings.
On systemic examination—tell the findings of the specific system. Then tell, “other systems reveal no abnormality”.
My diagnosis is … (Tell the diagnosis if it is possible).
If the diagnosis is not clear, then tell in the following manner—“With this history and physical findings, I can tell some differential diagnoses”.
Now, be ready to answer the questions asked by the examiner.
BRIeF dISCuSSION aNd eLaBORaTION aBOuT
PHYSIC aL eXaMINaTION
Always begin with the general examination, followed by systemic examination. Details history will suggest that system or parts of the body should be examined first.
general examination
Remember, “A doctor must be a good observer, like a detective”. So, before starting general examination, look carefully from head to foot.
Y Appearance (ill or well looking, depressed, anxious, Cushingoid, expressionless face)
Y Built (obese, emaciated or cachexic, tall, short, normal)
Y Nutrition (well nourished, poor, normal)
Y Decubitus (on choice, propped up, lateral bending, Mohammedan’s prayer position)
Y Anemia (see in palpebral part of conjunctiva, tongue, palm, nails, body as a whole). Mention whether it is mild, moderate or severe
Y Jaundice (see in sclera, under surface of the tongue, palm, body as a whole). Mention whether it is mild, moderate or severe (deep)
Y Cyanosis (see in tip of the nose, lips, ear lobule, tongue, tip of the finger and toes). Comment whether the cyanosis is peripheral or central. Be aware of differential cyanosis (it means cyanosis in toes, not fingers)
Y Clubbing (see fluctuation of nail base, angle between the nail and its base, curvature of the nails, look for hypertrophic osteoarthropathy by pressing the lower end of tibia-fibula or radius-ulna). Mention whether it is early clubbing, drum-stick or parrot-beak appearance. Be aware of differential clubbing (it means clubbing in toes, not fingers)
Y Koilonychia (feel the nails for dryness, brittleness, flattening, thinning, spooning)
Y Leukonychia (white spots in nail or white nail)
Y Edema (in leg above the medial malleolus, in sacrum if the patient is recumbent)
Y Dehydration (skin turgor, dry tongue)
Y Pigmentation (exposed parts, face, neck, palmar creases, knuckles, inner side of the mouth, recent scars)
Y Lymph nodes (examine systematically in different areas)
Y Thyroid gland (palpable or enlarged). If enlarged, examine in details
Y Breasts (normal or enlarged or any mass)
Y Bony tenderness
Y Body hair distribution (including head, to see alopecia)
Y Pulse (rate/min)
Y Blood pressure
Y Temperature (record in Centigrade or Fahrenheit)
Y Respiration (number of respiration per minute, mention if any abnormality found).
(Other findings, though not seen routinely, should be mentioned if present or relevant to individual cases. examples are – xanthelasma, corneal arcus, xanthomatous nodules, skin rash, alopecia, scratch mark, rheumatoid nodule, Dupuytren’s contracture, palmar erythema, Osler’s node, splinter hemorrhage, Heberden’s node, Bouchard’s node, gangrene or nail fold infarct or nail fold telangiectasia, ulceration, wasting, skin rash or Gottron’s patch, spider angioma, parotid gland enlargement, striae, Campbell de Morgan’s spot, purpura, vitiligo, deformity like kyphosis, scoliosis, lordosis).
Note
Mention if the patient has any cannula, catheter, N-G tube, CV line, A-V fistula, etc. Remember to examine the lower limb to see unilateral leg swelling, DVT, differential cyanosis, clubbing, trophic ulcer or gangrene.
Systemic examination
(From the history, once you get a clue of a particular disease, examine that system first. Then examine the other systems).
Cardiovascular System (First See Pulse, Neck Veins and BP, then Examine the Precordium)
1. Pulse (all the following features should be seen in radial pulse):
x Rate (beat/min)
x Rhythm (interval between two beats)
x Volume—low, high or normal (make sure you lift the arm to see collapsing pulse)
x Character (normal, slow rising, collapsing)
x Condition of the vessel wall (if normal, tell, “neither thicken nor tortuous”)
x Radio-femoral delay and radio-radial delay (or inequality).
Compare all other pulses simultaneously (beware of the carotid pulse that should not be seen simultaneously). Volume and character of the pulse are better seen in the brachial and carotid artery. Collapsing pulse in aortic regurgitation and pulsus alternans in acute left ventricular failure are better seen in the radial artery.
2. Neck veins (JVP): The patient should lie at 45°.
x Normal or engorged (internal jugular vein that lies medial to the sternomastoid). If visible, see any prominent wave. Always see hepatojugular reflux. Next, measure the height from the sternal angle (it indicates the mean pressure in the right atrium. Normally, it is at the level of the sternal angle and invisible).
x Other signs in neck:
• Tall, sinuous venous pulse, oscillating up to the ear lobule (indicates prominent V wave, found in tricuspid regurgitation)
• Dancing carotid pulse (called Corrigan’s sign found in aortic regurgitation)
• Vigorous arterial pulsation in neck (found in coarctation of aorta)
• Other pulsation in neck (carotid aneurysm or subclavian artery aneurysm).
3. Blood pressure (BP):
x Measure BP (normal or high).
• Low systolic, normal diastolic and narrow pulse pressure (found in aortic stenosis)
• High systolic, low diastolic and wide pulse pressure (found in aortic regurgitation) (If needed, see in both arms, also in standing and lying to see postural hypotension).
examination of Precordium
Inspection:
Y Deformity of the chest wall (kyphosis, scoliosis, lordosis, pectus excavatum or carinatum)
Y Visible cardiac impulse (visible apex beat)
Another random document with no related content on Scribd:
faintest reflection in the pages of this diary Even the Mischianza— that marvellous combination of ball, banquet, and tournament—is dismissed in a few brief sentences. “Ye scenes of Vanity and Folly,” says the home-staying Quaker wife, though still without any rancorous disapprobation of the worldly pleasures in which she has no share. To withstand steadfastly the allurements of life, yet pass no censure upon those who yield to them, denotes a gentle breadth of character, far removed from the complacent self-esteem of the “unco guid.” When a young English officer, whom Elizabeth Drinker is compelled to receive under her roof, gives an evening concert in his rooms, and the quiet house rings for the first time with music and loud voices, her only comment on the entertainment is that it was “carried on with as much soberness and good order as the nature of the thing admitted.” And when he invites a dozen friends to dine with him, she merely records that “they made very little noise, and went away timeously.” It is a good tonic to read any pages so free from complaints and repining.
The diary bears witness to the sad distress of careless merrymakers when the British army prepared to take the field, to the departure of many prominent Tories with Admiral Howe’s fleet, and to the wonderful speed and silence with which Sir Henry Clinton withdrew his forces from Philadelphia. “Last night,” writes Elizabeth on the 18th of June, 1778, “there were nine thousand of ye British Troops left in Town, and eleven thousand in ye Jerseys. This morning, when we arose, there was not one Red-Coat to be seen in Town, and ye Encampment in ye Jerseys had vanished.”
With the return of Congress a new era of discomfort began for the persecuted Friends, whose houses were always liable to be searched, whose doors were battered down, and whose windows were broken by the vivacious mob; while the repeated seizures of household effects for unpaid war taxes soon left rigid members of the society—bound at any cost to obey the dictates of their uncompromising consciences—without a vestige of furniture in their pillaged homes. “George Schlosser and a young man with him came to inquire what stores we have,” is a characteristic entry in the journal. “Looked into ye middle room and cellar. Behaved
complaisant. Their authority, the Populace.” And again: “We have taxes at a great rate almost daily coming upon us. Yesterday was seized a walnut Dining Table, five walnut Chairs, and a pair of large End-Irons, as our part of a tax for sending two men out in the Militia.” This experience is repeated over and over again, varied occasionally by some livelier demonstrations on the part of the “populace,” which had matters all its own way during those wild years of misrule. When word came to Philadelphia that Lord Cornwallis had surrendered, the mob promptly expressed its satisfaction by wrecking the houses of Friends and Tory sympathizers. “We had seventy panes of glass broken,” writes Elizabeth calmly, “ye sash lights and two panels of the front Parlour broke in pieces; ye Door cracked and violently burst open, when they threw stones into ye House for some time, but did not enter. Some fared better, some worse. Some Houses, after breaking ye door, they entered, and destroyed the Furniture. Many women and children were frightened into fits, and ’tis a mercy no lives were lost.”
When peace was restored and the federal government firmly established, these disorders came to an end; a new security reigned in place of the old placid content; and a new prosperity, more buoyant but less solid than that of colonial days, gave to Philadelphia, as to other towns, an air of gayety, and habits of increased extravagance. We hear no more of the men who went with clubs from shop to shop, “obliging ye people to lower their prices,”— a proceeding so manifestly absurd that “Tommy Redman, the Doctor’s apprentice, was put in prison for laughing as ye Regulators passed by.” We hear no more of houses searched or furniture carted away. Elizabeth Drinker’s diary begins to deal with other matters, and we learn to our delight that this sedate Quakeress was passionately fond of reading romances;—those alluring, longwinded, sentimental, impossible romances, dear to our greatgrandmothers’ hearts. It is true she does not wholly approve of such self-indulgence, and has ever ready some word of excuse for her own weakness; but none the less “The Mysteries of Udolpho” and its sister stories thrill her with delicious emotions of pity and alarm. “I have read a foolish romance called ‘The Haunted Priory; or the Fortunes of the House of Rayo,’” she writes on one occasion; “but I
have also finished knitting a pair of large cotton stockings, bound a petticoat, and made a batch of gingerbread. This I mention to show that I have not spent the whole day reading.” Again she confesses to completing two thick volumes entitled “The Victim of Magical Illusions; or the Mystery of the Revolution of P—— L——,” which claimed to be a “magico-political tale, founded on historic fact.” “It may seem strange,” she muses, “that I should begin the year, reading romances. ’Tis a practice I by no means highly approve, yet I trust I have not sinned, as I read a little of most things.”
She does indeed, for we find her after a time dipping into—of all books in the world—Rabelais, and retiring hastily from the experiment. “I expected something very sensible and clever,” she says sadly, “but on looking over the volumes I was ashamed I had sent for them.” Mary Wollstonecraft’s “Vindication of the Rights of Women” pleases her infinitely better; though she is unwilling to go so far as the impetuous Englishwoman, in whom reasonableness was never a predominant trait. Unrestricted freedom, that curbless wandering through doubtful paths which end in social pitfalls, offered no allurement to the Quaker wife in whom self-restraint had become second nature; but her own intelligence and her practical capacity for affairs made her respect both the attainments and the prerogatives of her sex. In fact, she appears to have had exceedingly clear and definite opinions upon most matters which came within her ken, and she expresses them in her diary without diffidence or hesitation. The idol of the Revolutionary period was Tom Paine; and when we had established our own republic, the enthusiasm we felt for republican France predisposed us still to believe that Paine’s turbulent eloquence embodied all wisdom, all justice, and all truth. In Philadelphia the French craze assumed more dangerous and absurd proportions than in any other city of the Union. Her once decorous Quaker streets were ornamented with liberty-poles and flower-strewn altars to freedom, around which men and women, girls and boys, danced the carmagnole, and shrieked wild nonsense about tyrants and the guillotine. The once quiet nights were made hideous with echoes of “Ça ira” and the Marseillaise. Citizens, once sober and sensible, wore the bonnet rouge, exchanged fraternal embraces, recited mad odes at dinners, and played tricks fantastic enough to
plunge the whole hierarchy of heaven into tears,—or laughter “If angels have any fun in them,” says Horace Walpole, “how we must divert them!” Naturally, amid this popular excitation, “The Rights of Man” and “The Age of Reason” were the best-read books of the day, and people talked about them with that fierce fervour which forbade doubt or denial.
Now Elizabeth Drinker was never fervent. Hers was that critical attitude which unconsciously, but inevitably, weighs, measures, and preserves a finely adjusted mental balance. She read “The Age of Reason,” and she read “The Rights of Man,” and then she read Addison’s “Evidences of the Christian Religion,” by way of putting her mind in order, and then she sat down and wrote:—
“Those who are capable of much wickedness are, if their minds take a right turn, capable of much good; and we must allow that Tom Paine has the knack of writing, or putting his thoughts and words into method. Were he rightly inclined, he could, I doubt not, say ten times as much in favour of the Christian religion as he has advanced against it. And if Lewis ye 17th were set up as King of France, and a sufficient party in his favour, and Paine highly bribed or flattered, he would write more for a monarchical government than he has ever written on the other side.”
Yet orthodoxy alone, unsupported by intellect, had scant charm for this devout Quakeress. She wanted, as she expresses it, thoughts and words put into method. Of a most orthodox and pious little book, which enjoyed the approbation of her contemporaries, she writes as follows: “Read a pamphlet entitled ‘Rewards and Punishments; or Satan’s Kingdom Aristocratical,’ written by John Cox, a Philadelphian, in verse. Not much to the credit of J. C. as a poet, nor to the credit of Philadelphia; tho’ the young man may mean well, and might perhaps have done better in prose.”
“Pilgrim’s Progress,” however, she confesses she has read three times, and finds that, “tho’ little thought of by some,” she likes it better and better with each fresh reading. Lavater she admires as a deep and original thinker, while mistrusting that he has “too good a conceit” of his own theories and abilities; and the “Morals” of
Confucius she pronounces “a sweet little piece,” and finer than most things produced by a more enlightened age.
This is not a bad showing for those easy old days, when the higher education of women had not yet dawned as a remote possibility upon any mind; and when, in truth, the education of men had fallen to a lower level than in earlier colonial times. Philadelphia was sinking into a stagnant mediocrity, her college had been robbed of its charter, and the scholarly ambitions (they were never more than ambitions) of Franklin’s time were fading fast away. Even Franklin, while writing admirable prose, had failed to discover any difference between good and bad verse. His own verse is as cheerfully and comprehensively bad as any to be found, and he always maintained that men should practise the art of poetry, only that they might improve their prose. This purely utilitarian view of the poet’s office was not conducive to high thinking or fine criticism; and Elizabeth Drinker was doubtless in a very small minority when she objected to “Satan’s Kingdom Aristocratical,” on the score of its halting measures.
The most striking characteristic of our Quaker diarist is precisely this clear, cold, unbiased judgment, this sanity of a well-ordered mind. What she lacks, what the journal lacks from beginning to end, is some touch of human and ill-repressed emotion, some word of pleasant folly, some weakness left undisguised and unrepented. The attitude maintained throughout is too judicial, the repose of heart and soul too absolute to be endearing. Here is a significant entry, illustrating as well as any other this nicely balanced nature, which gave to all just what was due, and nothing more:—
“There has been a disorder lately among ye cats. Our poor old Puss, who has been for some time past unwell, died this morning, in ye 13th year of her age. Peter dug a grave two feet deep on ye bank in our garden, under ye stable window, where E. S., Peter and I saw her decently interred. I had as good a regard for her as was necessary.”
Was ever affection meted out like this? Was there ever such Quaker-like precision of esteem? For thirteen years that cat had
been Elizabeth Drinker’s companion, and she had acquired for her just as good a regard as was necessary, and no more. It was not thus Sir Walter spoke, when Hinse of Hinsdale lay dead beneath the windows of Abbotsford, slain by the great staghound, Nimrod. It was not thus that M. Gautier lamented the consumptive Pierrot. It is not thus that the heart mourns, when a little figure, friendly and familiar, sits no longer by our desolate hearth.
FRENCH LOVE-SONGS
Quand on est coquette, il faut être sage; L’oiseau de passage
Qui vole à plein cœur
Ne dort pas en l’air comme une hirondelle, Et peut, d’un coup d’aile, Briser une fleur.
A M .
T literature of a nation is rooted in national characteristics. Foreign influences may dominate it for a time; but that which is born of the soil is imperishable, and must, by virtue of tenacity, conquer in the end. England, after the Restoration, tried very hard to be French, and the “happy and unreflecting wantonness” of her earlier song was chilled into sobriety by the measured cadences of Gallic verse; yet the painful and perverse effort to adjust herself to strange conditions left her more triumphantly English than before. We are tethered to our kind, and the wisest of all wise limitations is that which holds us well within the sphere of natural and harmonious development.
It is true, however, that nationality betrays itself less in lyrics, and, above all, less in love lyrics, than in any other form of literature. Love is a malady, the common symptoms of which are the same in all patients; and though love-songs—like battle-songs and drinkingsongs—are seldom legitimate offsprings of experience, they are efforts to express in words that sweet and transient pain. “Les âmes bien nées”—without regard to birthplace—clearly of their passion, and seek their “petit coin de bonheur” under Southern and Northern skies. The Latin races have, indeed, depths of reserve underlying their apparent frankness, and the Saxons have a genius for self-
revelation underlying their apparent reticence; but these traits count for little in the refined duplicity of the love-song.
Garde bien ta belle folie! has been its burden ever since it was first chanted by minstrel lips.
M. Brunetière frankly admits the inferiority of the French lyric, an inferiority which he attributes to the predominance of social characteristics in the literature, as in the life of France. When poetry is compelled to fulfil a social function, to express social conditions and social truths, to emphasize fundamental principles and balance contrasted forces, the founts of lyrical inspiration are early dried. Individualism is their source,—the sharp, clear striking of the personal note; and the English, says M. Brunetière, excel in this regard. “To Lucasta. Going to the Warres,” has no perfect counterpart in the love-songs of other lands.
Even the eager desire of the Frenchman to be always intelligible (“That which is not lucid is not French”) militates against the perfection of the lyric. So too does his exquisite and inborn sense of proportion. “Measure,” says Mr. Brownell, “is a French passion;” but it is a passion that refuses to lend itself to rapturous sentiment.
Et veut que l’on soit sage avec sobriété is hardly a maxim to which the genius of the love-song gives willing ear. Rather is she the La Belle Dame sans Merci, or the Elfin Lady who rode through the forests of ancient France.
My sire is the nightingale, That sings, making his wail, In the wild wood, clear; The mermaid is mother to me, That sings in the salt sea, In the ocean mere.
“What,” asks Mr. Brownell hopelessly, “has become of this Celtic strain in the French nature?”—a strain which found vent in the
“poésie courtoise,” playful, amorous, laden with delicate subtleties and fond conceits. This poesie—once the delight of Christendom— echoes still in Petrarch’s sonnets and in Shakespeare’s madrigals; but it is difficult to link its sweet extravagances with the chiselled verse of later days, and critics forget the past in their careful contemplation of the present. “French poetry,” says Mr. Zangwill, “has always leant to the frigid, the academic, the rhetorical,—in a word, to the prosaic. The spirit of Boileau has ruled it from his cold marble urn.”
But long before Boileau lay in his urn—or in his cradle—the poets of France, like the poets of Albion, sang with facile grace of love, and dalliance, and the glory of youth and spring. The fact that Boileau ignored and despised their song, and taught his obedient followers to ignore and despise it also, cannot silence those early notes. When he descended frigidly to his grave, Euterpe tucked up her loosened hair, and sandalled her bare white feet, and girdled her disordered robes into decent folds. Perhaps it was high time for these reforms. Nothing is less seductive in middle age than the careless gayety of youth. But once France was young, and Euterpe a slip of a girl, and no grim shadow of that classic urn rested on the golden days when Aucassin—model of defiant and conquering lovers—followed Nicolette into the deep, mysterious woods.
Jeunesse sur moy a puissance, Mais Vieillesse fait son effort De m’avoir en sa gouvernance,
sang Charles d’Orléans, embodying in three lines the whole history of man and song. Youth was lusty and folly riotous when Ronsard’s mistress woke in the morning, and found Apollo waiting patiently to fill his quiver with arrows from her eyes; or when Jacques Tahureau watched the stars of heaven grow dim before his lady’s brightness; or when Vauquelin de la Fresnaye saw Philis sleeping on a bed of lilies, regardless of discomfort, and surrounded by infant Loves.
J’admirois toutes ces beautez Égalles à mes loyautez, Quand l’esprit me dist en l’oreille: Fol, que fais-tu? Le temps perdu Souvent est chèrement vendu; S’on le recouvre, c’est merveille.
Alors, je m’abbaissai tout bas, Sans bruit je marchai pas à pas, Et baisai ses lèvres pourprines: Savourant un tel bien, je dis Que tel est dans le Paradis Le plaisir des âmes divines.
With just such sweet absurdities, such pardonable insincerities, the poets of Elizabeth’s England fill their amorous verse. George Gascoigne “swims in heaven” if his mistress smiles upon him; John Lyly unhesitatingly asserts that Daphne’s voice “tunes all the spheres;” and Lodge exhausts the resources of the vegetable and mineral kingdoms in searching for comparisons by which to set forth the beauties of Rosalind. The philosophy of love is alike on both sides of the Channel, and expressed in much the same terms of soft insistence. Carpe diem is, and has always been, the lover’s maxim; and the irresistible eloquence of the lyric resolves itself finally into these two words of warning, whether urged by Celt or Saxon. Herrick is well aware of their supreme significance when he sings:—
Gather ye rose-buds while ye may, Old Time is still a-flying: And this same flower that smiles to-day, To-morrow will be dying.
Then be not coy, but use your time, And while ye may, go marry; For having lost but once your prime, You may forever tarry.
Ronsard, pleading with his mistress, strikes the same relentless note:—
Donc, si vous me croyez, Mignonne, Tandis que vostre âge fleuronne
En sa plus vert nouveauté, Cueillez, cueillez vostre jeunesse; Comme à cette fleur, la vieillesse Fera ternir vostre beauté.
May-day comes alike in England and in France. Herrick and Jean Passerat, poets of Devonshire and of Champagne, are equally determined that two fair sluggards, who love their pillows better than the dewy grass, shall rise from bed, and share with them the sparkling rapture of the early dawn. Herrick’s verse, laden with the freshness of the Spring, rings imperatively in Corinna’s sleepy ears:—
Get up, get up, for shame! The blooming Morn Upon her wings presents the god unshorn. See how Aurora throws her fair Fresh-quilted colours through the air. Get up, sweet Slug-a-bed, and see The dew bespangling herb and tree.
And then—across the gayety of the song—the deepening note of persuasion strikes a familiar chord:—
Come, let us go, while we are in our prime; And take the harmless folly of the time! We shall grow old apace, and die Before we know our liberty
Passerat is no less insistent. The suitors of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries seem to have dedicated the chill hours of early morning to their courtship. Nor was the custom purely pastoral and poetic. When Lovelace makes his appointments with Clarissa Harlowe at five A. M., the modern reader—if Richardson has a modern reader—is wont to think the hour an unpropitious one; but to Herrick and to the Pléiade it would have seemed rational enough.
Laissons le lit et le sommeil Ceste journée: Pour nous, l’Aurore au front vermeil Est desjà née
sings the French poet beneath his lady’s window; adding, to overcome her coyness—or her sleepiness—the old dominant argument:—
Ce vieillard, contraire aus amans, Des aisles porte, Et en fuyant, nos meilleurs ans Bien loing emporte. Quand ridée un jour tu seras, Mélancholique, tu diras: J’estoy peu sage, Qui n’usoy point de la beauté Que si tost le temps a osté De mon visage.
No less striking is the similarity between the reproachful couplets in which the singers of England and of France delight in denouncing their unfaithful fair ones, or in confessing with harmonious sighs the transient nature of their own emotions. Inconstancy is the breath of love’s nostrils, and the inspiration of love’s songs, which enchant us because they express an exquisite sentiment in its brief moment of ascendency. The tell-tale past, the dubious future, are alike discreetly ignored. Love in the drama and in the romance plays rather a heavy part. It is too obtrusively omniscient. It is far too selfassertive. Yet the average taxpayer, as has been well remarked, is no more capable of a grand passion than of a grand opera. The utmost he can achieve is some fair, fleeting hour, and with the imperative gladness of such an hour the love-song thrills sympathetically. It is not its business to
recapture
That
first fine careless rapture.
It does not essay the impossible.
Now the old and nameless French poet who wrote—
Femme, plaisir de demye heure, Et ennuy qui sans fins demeure,
was perhaps too ungraciously candid. Such things, when said at all, should be said prettily.
Sigh no more, ladies, sigh no more,— Men were deceivers ever; One foot in sea, and one on shore, To one thing constant never.
Gay voices came bubbling with laughter from the happy days that are dead. Sir John Suckling, whose admirable advice to an overfaithful young suitor has been the most invigorating of tonics to suitors ever since, vaunts with pardonable pride his own singleness of heart:—
Out upon it! I have loved Three whole days together, And am like to love three more, If it prove fair weather.
Time shall moult away his wings Ere he shall discover In the whole wide world again Such a constant lover.
Sir John Sedley epitomizes the situation in his praises of that jade, Phillis, whose smiles win easy pardon for her perfidy:—
She deceiving, I believing,— What need lovers wish for more?
And Lovelace, reversing the medal, pleads musically—and not in vain—for the same gracious indulgence:—
Why shouldst thou sweare I am forsworn, Since thine I vowed to be?
Lady it is already Morn, And ’twas last night I swore to thee That fond impossibility.
Mr Lang is of the opinion that no Gallic verse has equalled in audacity this confession of limitations, this “Apologia pro Vita Sua;” and perhaps its light-heartedness is well out of general reach. But the French lover, like the English, was made of threats and promises alike fruitless of fulfilment, and Phillis had many a fair foreign sister, no whit more worthy of regard. Only, amid the laughter and raillery of a Latin people, there rings ever an undertone of regret,—not passionate and heart-breaking, as in Drayton’s bitter cry,—
Since there’s no help, come let us kiss and part, but vague and subtle, linking itself tenderly to some long-ignored and half-forgotten sentiment, buried deep in the reader’s heart.
Mais où sont les neiges d’antan?
A little sob breaks the smooth sweetness of Belleau’s verse, and Ronsard’s beautiful lines to his careless young mistress are heavy with the burden of sighs:—
Quand vous serez bien vieille, au soir, à la chandelle, Assise auprès du feu, devisant et filant, Direz, chantant mes vers, en vous esmerveillant: ‘Ronsard me célébroit du temps que j’estois belle.’
The note deepens as we pass into the more conscious art of later years, but it is always French in its grace and moderation. How endurable is the regret with which de Musset sings of Juana, who loved him for a whole year; how musical his farewell to Suzon, whose briefer passion lasted eight summer days:—
Que notre amour, si tu m’oublies, Suzon, dure encore un moment; Comme un bouquet de fleurs pâlies; Cache-le dans ton sein charmant! Adieu! le bonheur reste au gîte: Le souvenir part avec moi:
Je l’emporterai, ma petite, Bien loin, bien vite, Toujours à toi.
In Murger’s familiar verses, so pretty and gay and heartsick, in the finer art of Gautier, in the cloudy lyrics of Verlaine, we catch again and again this murmur of poignant but subdued regret, this sigh for the light love that has so swiftly fled. The delicacy of the sentiment is unmatched in English song. The Saxon can be profoundly sad, and he can—or at least he could—be ringingly and recklessly gay; but the mood which is neither sad nor gay, which is fed by refined emotions, and tranquillized by time’s subduing touch, has been expressed oftener and better in France. Four hundred and fifty years ago François Villon touched this exquisite chord in his “Ballade des Dames du Temps Jadis,” and it has vibrated gently ever since. We hear it echoing with melancholy grace in these simple lines of Gérard de Nerval:—
Où sont les amoureuses?
Elles sont au tombeau! Elles sont plus heureuses, Dans un séjour plus beau.
Nerval, like Villon, had drunk deep of the bitterness of life, but he never permitted its dregs to pollute the clearness of his song:—
Et vent que l’on soit triste avec sobriété.
In the opinion of many critics, the lyric was not silenced, only chilled, by the development of the classical spirit in France, and the corresponding conversion of England. Its flute notes were heard now and then amid the decorous couplets that delighted well-bred ears. Waller undertook the reformation of English verse, and accomplished it to his own and his readers’ radiant satisfaction; yet Waller’s sevenyear suit of Lady Dorothy Sidney is the perfection of that poetic lovemaking which does not lead, and is not expected to lead, to anything
definite and tangible. Never were more charming tributes laid at the feet of indifferent beauty; never was indifference received with less concern. Sacharissa listened and smiled. The world—the august little world of rank and distinction—listened and smiled with her, knowing the poems were written as much for its edification as for hers; and Waller, well pleased with the audience, nursed his passion tenderly until it flowered into another delicate blossom of verse. The situation was full of enjoyment while it lasted; and when the seven years were over, Lady Dorothy married Henry, Lord Spencer, who never wrote any poetry at all; while her lover said his last good-bye in the most sparkling and heart-whole letter ever penned by inconstant man. What would the author of “The Girdle,” and “Go, Lovely Rose,” have thought of Browning’s uneasy rapture?
O lyric love, half angel and half bird, And all a wonder and a wild desire.
He would probably have pointed out the exaggeration of the sentiment, and the corresponding looseness of the lines. He would certainly have agreed with the verdict of M. Sévelinges, had that acute critic uttered it in his day. “It is well,” says M. Sévelinges, “that passionate love is rare. Its principal effect is to detach men from all their surroundings, to isolate them, to render them independent of the relations which they have not formed for themselves; and a civilized society composed of lovers would return infallibly to misery and barbarism.”
Here is the French point of view, expressed with that lucidity which the nation so highly esteems. Who shall gainsay its correctness? But the Saxon, like the Teuton, is sentimental to his heart’s core, and finds some illusions better worth cherishing than truth. It was an Englishman, and one to whom the epithet “cynical” has been applied oftenest, and with least accuracy, who wrote,—
When he was young as you are young,
When he was young, and lutes were strung, And love-lamps in the casement hung.
THE SPINSTER
The most ordinarie cause of a single life is liberty, especially in certain self-pleasing and humorous minds, which are so sensible of every restriction, as they wil goe neere to thinke their girdles and garters to be bonds and shakles.—B
I the Zend-Avesta, as translated by Anquetil-Duperron, there is a discouraging sentence passed upon voluntary spinsterhood: “The damsel who, having reached the age of eighteen, shall refuse to marry, must remain in Hell until the earth is shattered.”
This assurance is interesting, less because of its provision for the spinster’s future than because it takes into consideration the possibility of her refusing to marry;—a possibility which slipped out of men’s minds from the time of Zoroaster until our present day. A vast deal has been written about marriage in the interval; but it all bears the imprint of the masculine intellect, reasoning from the masculine point of view, for the benefit of masculinity, and ignoring in the most natural manner the woman’s side of life. The trend of argument is mainly in one direction. While a few cynics gibe at love and conjugal felicity, the mass of poets and philosophers unite in extolling wedlock. Some praise its pleasures, others its duties, and others again merely point out with Euripides that, as children cannot be bought with gold or silver, there is no way of acquiring these coveted possessions save by the help of women. Now and then a rare word of sympathy is flung to the wife, as in those touching lines of Sophocles upon the young girls sold in their “gleeful maidenhood” to sad or shameful marriage-beds. But the important thing to be achieved is the welfare and happiness of men. The welfare and happiness of women are supposed—not without reason—to follow as a necessary sequence; but this is a point which excites no very deep concern.
Catholic Christendom throughout the Middle Ages, and long afterwards, offered one practical solution to the problem of unmated and unprotected womanhood,—the convent. The girl robbed of all hope of marriage by bitter stress of war or poverty, the girl who feared too deeply the turmoil and violence of the world, found shelter in the convent. Within its walls she was reasonably safe, and her vows lent dignity to her maidenhood. Bride of the Church, she did not rank as a spinster, and her position had the advantage of being accurately defined; she was part of a recognized social and ecclesiastical system. No one feels this more solidly than does a nun to-day, and no one looks with more contempt upon unmarried women in the world. In her eyes there are but two vocations,— wifehood and consecrated virginity. She perceives that the wife and the religious are transmitters of the world’s traditions; while the spinster is an anomaly, with no inherited background to give repute and distinction to her rôle.
This point of view is the basis of much criticism, and has afforded scope for the ridicule of the satirist, and for the outpourings of the sentimentalist. A great many brutal jests have been flung at the old maid, and floods of sickly sentiment have been wasted on her behalf. She has been laughed at frankly as one rejected by men, and she has been wept over as a wasted force, withering patiently under the blight of this rejection. “Envy, hatred, malice, and all uncharitableness” have been ascribed to her on one side, and a host of low-spirited and treacly virtues, on the other. The spinster of comedy is a familiar figure. A perfectly simple and ingenuous example is the maiden aunt in “Pickwick,” Miss Rachel Wardle, whom Mr. Tupman loves, and with whom Mr. Jingle elopes. She is spiteful and foolish, envious of youth and easy to dupe. She is utterly ridiculous, and a fair mark for laughter. She is pinched, and withered, and hopelessly removed from all charm of womanhood; and—it may be mentioned parenthetically—she is fifty years old. We have her brother’s word for it.
There is nothing in this straightforward caricature that could, or that should, wound anybody’s sensibilities. The fun is of a robust order; the ridicule has no subtlety and no sting. But the old maid of
