Instant download Taliban narratives: the use and power of stories in the afghanistan conflict thomas
Taliban Narratives: The Use and Power of Stories in the Afghanistan Conflict
Thomas Johnson
Visit to download the full and correct content document: https://textbookfull.com/product/taliban-narratives-the-use-and-power-of-stories-in-the -afghanistan-conflict-thomas-johnson/
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant download maybe you interests ...
Transmedial Narration: Narratives and Stories in Different Media Lars Elleström
The Use and Power of Stories in the Afghanistan Conflict
A
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.
Oxford New York
Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi
Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto
With offices in
Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore
South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam
Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries.
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.
You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available Thomas H. Johnson, Matthew DuPee and Wali Shaaker. Taliban Narratives: The Use and Power of Stories in the Afghanistan Conflict ISBN: 9780190840600
Printed in India on acid-free paper
I would like to dedicate this book to Lt. Col. John Darin (JD) Loftis, a student, friend, and outstanding military officer who was murdered while helping the people of Afghanistan whom he loved and respected dearly.
I also dedicate this book to Ryan and Courtney, whose love and inspiration maintain me.
1. Introduction
2. An Overview of Taliban and Other Afghan Insurgent Stories and an Assessment of their Master Narratives
3. Target Audiences of Afghan Narratives and Stories
4. Taliban and Afghan Insurgent Magazines, Circulars, and Newsletters
5. The Taliban’s Use of Shabnamah (Night Letters)
6. The Taliban’s Use of the Internet, Social Media Video, Radio Stations, and Graffiti
7. The Afghans’ and Taliban’s Use of Poetry and Taranas
10. The United States’ Afghan Information and PSYOP Campaign and a Comparison with the Taliban’s Campaign
11. Conclusions
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This book was initially conceived at the US Naval Postgraduate School (NPS)’s Program for Culture and Conflict Studies (CCS), which I direct. The research associates and assistants on the program played an indispensable role in the conceptualization of data and notions concerning many of the analyses presented in this book. I would like first to thank Matthew DuPee. I came across Matt’s tremendous self-taught knowledge of Afghanistan by reading his articles published on the influential blog, the Long War Journal. I found his articles full of data and knowledge concerning Afghanistan that appeared in no other media outlet. It was very evident that he had valuable Afghan contacts and used them extremely effectively. I was so impressed with his scholarship and his writing that I eventually contacted and offered him a research position at CCS and a stipend to enter the MA program in National Security Affairs at NPS. He proved to be an outstanding student, graduating with highest honors, as well as being a tremendous colleague and researcher. His self-initiative, smarts, and outstanding analytic and writing capabilities proved invaluable. He co-authored a number of peer-reviewed journal articles with me and made invaluable contributions to nearly every chapter presented in this book. He now serves as an important Department of Defense Afghan analyst. The country is fortunate to have his services.
I would also like to thank Wali Ahmed Shaaker, an important and wellknown Afghan-American poet who was initially hired as a translator for the CCS. I quickly learned that his intellectual tool chest relative to Afghanistan was vast. He basically taught me the essence of Afghan poetry and its many variants, as well as important Afghan poets that we needed to consider in assessing the role of poetry in Afghan IO. Wali’s research was critical for those sections of this book that deal with Afghan and Taliban poetry. His transla-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
tions of Taliban materials, especially poetry, proved extremely important and are presented in this book. In addition, his support of my field research in Afghanistan proved extremely valuable.
Other CCS members also played critical roles in the research presented here. I would like to thank especially Ahmad Waheed and Amina KatorMumbarez. Ahmad, a Kandahari Afghan, now a US citizen, who initially came to study in the United States as a Fulbright Scholar, helped to bring Afghan nuance to almost all of the analyses presented in this book. He served as a CCS Research Associate for over five years, and his contributions to the research presented here were numerous. Like the other CCS members suggested above, his self-initiative and dedication was infectious. Like Matt DuPee, Ahmad served as my co-author for peer-reviewed journal articles on a variety on subjects relevant to Taliban information operations. He translated most of the Pashto materials assessed in this book, including the hundreds of shabnamah whose summaries are presented in Appendix B (available online at www.hurstpublishers.com/book/taliban-narratives). Amina KatorMumbarez, another Afghan-American, was hired shortly after her graduation from the University of California in Berkeley where she organized important conferences and workshops on Afghanistan. Amina served the CCS as an invaluable colleague, proving to be a very gifted writer and researcher. She, like the other dedicated CCS colleagues, played a critical role in assessments of Taliban IO materials, data collection, analysis, and review. Keely M. Fahoum, a former NPS student, also played a significant role in educating me concerning the early US IO and PSYOP campaigns in Afghanistan. She had a wealth of knowledge concerning early OEF IO and PSYOP, some of which is reflected in this book. Elizabeth (Betsy) Hulme, an outstanding student intern from the University of North Carolina, made valuable contributions during the final push of finishing the book. Finally, I would like to thank Matthew Dearing, one of the first CCS research assistants, for supporting some of the early research relevant to this book.
Very importantly, most of these CCS scholars proved also to be tremendous friends and colleagues and played significant roles in the production of this book on their own time.
This book also benefited from conversations with NPS’s Center of Excellence for Information Dominance. I would like to thank especially Professors Hy Rothstein and John Arquilla. I was told that John once stated that the war in Afghanistan would eventually become a “battle of poetry,” and I believe the reasoning underlying this statement is quite prophetic and extremely relevant to the major thesis of this book.
x
Chris Mason, Harold Ingram, Graeme Smith, and Larry Goodson also helped to frame my ideas on many subjects presented here. This group of Afghan scholars regularly communicate with each other and me via emails discussing a variety of important Afghan subjects and personalities. They are also all valued friends. Chris Mason played an especially important role in my understanding of Afghan messaging and narratives, as well as the naiveté of US messaging and information operations.
I would also like to thank all my students at NPS that I have had the opportunity to interact with over the years. Many of these students have had multiple deployments to Afghanistan, and their experiences taught me valuable lessons concerning Afghanistan. In addition, many of my students had unique and real world experience with information operations conducted by both the US and the Taliban that proved important to developing my knowledge and ideas concerning Afghan IO.
The research presented would not have been possible without the data I gathered from numerous individuals interviewed over the course of my research. Such individuals included (please note that position and ranks, where known, reflect those at the time of the interview): Joanna Nathan (Senior Analyst, International Crisis Group), Joe Auger (Local Stability Initiatives Team Leader, DAI), Col. Woodsworth (Canadian PRT), Maj. Perey (Canadian PRT), Karen Swails (USAID officer), Sharif Noorzai, Dr Jouri, Whit Mason (Regional Justice Coordinator, UNAMA), Sarah Chayes, Louis Palu (freelance photographer and journalist), Abdul Bari (tribal elder from Maiwand, Ishaqzai Pashtun), Mohammadullah Barakzai (tribal elder from Panjwayi), Nimat Arghandabi (Head of National Islamic Society of Afghan Youth, Mohammedzai tribe), Qadir Khan Durrani, Alex Strick van Linschoten, three anonymous Kandahari District Taliban commanders, Qari Yousef (Taliban spokesman, southern Afghanistan), Zabidullah Mujahid (Taliban spokesman, eastern Afghanistan), LTC Eric Edin (Commander CJ-POTF), Col. Jeff Jaworsky (TF-Paladin/CJTF IO), Cdr Jon Young (TF-Paladin), LTC Dean Burbridge (CJTF IO), Edward Mooradian (COIC Red Team), Sgt Martinez (2/7 Marines, Helmand), Tom Targus (State Department Political Officer), Bruce Dubee (USDA advisor), Ted Wittenberger (USAID officer), James Fussel (TF Paladin), Dr Jeffery Bordin (Red Team Leader), Alisson Blosser (Assadabad PRT officer), Cdr Dan Dwyer (Assadabad PRT CO), Cpt. Rose (TF Paladin), Cpt. Beasley (EOD), Lt. Matt Myers Assadabad (PRT), MSGT Foreman (TF Paladin), various political party representatives: Sayyaf, United Front, Northern Alliance,
Kunar Governor Wahidi, LTC Paul Donovan (Nangahar PRT Commander), Maj. Brad Adams (TF Paladin), LTC Herb Bilewski (CIED JAF), Maj. Mike Jackson (CIED JAF), Sarah Rahimi (TF Paladin), Chancellor of Jalalabad Medical University, Haji Mohammed Hasan (Nangarhar Provincial Council Representative, Khogiani tribal elder, Sayyef Party representative), Dr Nijra Habib (Nangarhar Provincial Council representative), Abiba Khaker (Nangarhar Provincial Council representative), Lal Agha Kaker (Mayor of Jalalabad, Nangarhar), Nangarhar Governor Gul Agha Sherzai, Masood Ahmad Azizi (Chief of Staff for Nangarhar province), Nujayed Ahmad (Political Assistant, Jalalabad PRT), Fazil Hadi (Speaker of Nangarhar Provincial Council, Sayyaf Party Representative), Mirwais Ahmadzai (Director of Eastern Office, AIHRC), Cpt. John Morash (JIOC Jalalabad PRT), Sean Waddups (Jalalabad PRT Office), Gen. David McKiernan (ISAF Commanding General), Frank Curry (Assymetric Warfare Group, US Army), LTC Robert Spath (CJ POTF), Col. Dietger Lather (CJ POTF), Barbara Sotirin, (Deputy Director, HQUSACE), Bjorn Delaney (Lincoln Group), Todd Wilson (Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and Stabilization, US State Department), Brian Goodman, LTC Patrick Kearney (CIED), Christian Harstad (NORNAVSOC), Greg Reichman (CENTCOM), Col. Roger N. Sangvi (Director CJ2 CTSC), Ray Valez (JIEDDO), Alan Yu (Political Officer, US Embassy, Kabul), Paul Fishstein (Director AREU Kabul), Mohammad Yousef (Aschiana), Col. John Agoglia, Ayscha Hamdami (Political advisor, ISAF HQ), Abdullah Amini (Cultural Advisor to COMISAF), LTC Wood (TF Paladin XO), CWO Stephen Pierce, LTC Elders, LTC Jarkowsky, MAJ Dvorsack, Col. Michael Langley, Col. Ronald Sheldon (Senior Mentor and Team Chief, 201st ARSIC-IO), Cpt. Charles Johnson, Afghan MG Rahim Wardak, BG Edward Reeder, Jr (Commanding General Combined Forces Special Operations Component Command, Afghanistan CFSOCC-A), Col. Kevin Davis (Deputy Commander, CFSOCC-A), LTC David Markowski, CWO Steven Pierce, Col. Arthur Tulak (Director USFOR-A Information Operations), Col. Kevin Davis (Deputy Commander, CFSOCC-A), Col. Brian Sweeney (Director of Strategy, J5 Strategy and Plans, CFSOCC-A), LTC Lisa Miller (Task Force Phoenix IO), LTC Greg Elpers (POTF Task Force Siren Deputy Commander), Commander Christopher Hurley (SO2, Key Leader Engagement), Maj. Cas Benavidez (Chief IO Plans, USFOR-A Information Operations), Maj. Katherine Doyle (Analyst, USFOR-A Information Operations, USFOR-A IO Working Group), Michael Innes (JIC), BG
Jonathan Vance (Canadian Commander of Kandahar Task Force) and his HQ Staff, Col. La Croix (Deputy Commander KTF), Col. Hammand (KTF J-5), Col. Burt (OMLT Commander), LTC Paul (Canadian Battle Group Commander), Maj. Kevin McLoughlin (KTF J-5), Ken Lewis (Representative of Canada in Kandahar-RoCK), Ms Renata Pistone (CIDA), LTC Carl Taurren (Canadian Camp Nathan Smith PRT Commander), Ms Deborah Chatsis (Canadian Civilian PRT Director), Maj. Luis Carvallo (Canadian Camp), Nathan Smith (PRT Deputy Commanding Officer), Maj. Claude Villeneuve (Civil Military Cooperation-CIMC), Capt. Roy (CIMIC), Capt. Stepanie Godin (PAO), Maj. Chris Brooke (US PMT Commander), Khalil, Khan Mohammad Jan (Peace and Reconciliation Commission-PRC, Chief, Kandahar), Hajji Mullah Amadullah Khan (Zhari district shura member), Mullah Massoud (former District Chief for Maywand district, Kandahar), Anonymous Panjwaii district shura member, Jorge Silva (freelance photographer and journalist), David Beriain (documentarian/journalist), Anand Gopal (journalist, Christian Science Monitor), Ghulam Haidar (Mayor of Kandahar City), Maitullah Qati Khan (Provincial Police Chief for Kandahar), Khan Mohammad Jan (Peace and Reconciliation Commission Chief, Kandahar), BG Edward Reeder, Jr (Commanding General, Combined Forces Special Operations Component Command—Afghanistan, CFSOCC-A).
I would also like to thank various US and Canadian governmental organizations who enhanced parts of the research presented here. Finally, I would like to thank two anonymous reviewers whose constructive criticisms and suggestions have made this a much better book than the one they initially reviewed.
Thomas H. Johnson
Monterey, California, 9 May 2016
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Figures
Figure 1.1Leaflet designed by the author xxx
Figure 2.1Taliban narrative targets
23
Figure 2.2 “The US evil soldiers are defiling our Muslim sisters…” 29
Figure 5.1Taliban night letter, Kandahar, 2003 59 and 60
Figure 5.2 Warning letter to the people of Ma’ruf and Arghistan, Kandahar province 67
Figure 5.3Night letter, Wardak 70
Figure 5.4 Warning from Taliban Islamic movement, representative of Parwan and Kapisa provinces
Figure 5.5Taliban night letter from Ghazni
Figure 5.6Night letter from Kandahar
Figure 6.1 Alemarah cartoon, June 2011
75
77
80
86
Figure 6.2Screen dumps of Taliban Twitter accounts 91
Table 11.1Themes used in Taliban narratives and stories
Table 11.2Terms used in Taliban narratives and stories
Table 11.3Taliban narrative targets
Table 11.4Temporal differentiation of Taliban messaging
FOREWORD
Ambassador (Retd) Peter Tomsen
Throughout history, military strategists have often stressed the importance of motivation in warfare in relation to military might. Napoleon looked back in exile at his military career of victories and defeats to observe: “There are but two powers in the world, the sword and the mind… In the long run, the sword is always beaten by the mind.”
A thorough understanding of the enemy, including his will to fight, was highlighted by Sun Tzu, a Chinese strategist who lived in the sixth century BC: “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the results of a hundred battles.” Sun Tzu and Napoleon must have viewed their guidelines as applicable to all warfare. They have been especially relevant to guerrilla wars in modern times, pitting a militarily stronger side against a determined yet weaker foe on home turf. Vietnam comes to mind in this regard, as does the nine-year Soviet–Afghan war. In both conflicts, the guerrilla’s main goal was to mold military and informational operations into a unified, effective strategy to resist and outlast a superpower’s will to continue fighting an endless war.
In the end, the US and Soviet withdrawals from (respectively) Vietnam and Afghanistan represented more of a policy failure than a military defeat. The Soviet military in Afghanistan never lost a set-piece battle. After the Vietnam war, a Vietnamese general in Hanoi famously commented “That’s irrelevant”
when a visiting American retired officer stated that the US had never lost a battle during the war.
Since the initial withdrawal of US Coalition ground combat forces from Afghanistan in 2012, the outcome of the Afghan war has remained in doubt, even though the Pakistani-supported Afghan insurgency—collectively, the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani Network and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar’s Hisb-eIslami Gulbuddin (HIG)—has gained the upper hand in military and informational areas. The Coalition-backed Afghan National United Government (NUG) suffers from the same ailments that inflicted the South Vietnamese Nguyen Van Thieu government when I served as a District Senior Advisor in the Mekong Delta 1969–70, and later, in 1973, when I returned in the capacity of a ceasefire monitor. Pervasive government corruption, dating back to the Ngo Dinh Diem government and continuing to the 1975 defeat of the Thieu regime, reached down to the district level from elites in Saigon. Vietnamese leaders scuttled free and fair elections. The Vietnamese government’s popularity was higher than the popularity of the Communist insurgency in rural areas, but that was only a matter of degree. Most of the rural population just wanted the war to end—a sentiment that appeals to many rural Afghan communities today.
The American experience in Vietnam is not a good precedent for judging what lies ahead in Afghanistan. The two countries are vastly different, as is the regional geo-strategic context that has surrounded each conflict. Still, it bears noting that the South Vietnamese Thieu government lasted three years (1972–5) following the US withdrawal of ground forces. The Moscowdependent Najib regime in Kabul likewise lasted three more years (1989–92) before collapsing. In both cases, the insurgency had better synchronized, highly sophisticated information operations, with military strategy. Each benefited from a secure rear area to prepare and supply military offensives while—equally important—planning and executing a well-coordinated information campaign in the battle zone. In Vietnam, the insurgency in the South was permanently buoyed by the coming of military age of a quarter million North Vietnamese every year. They were armed with Soviet-supplied weaponry and sent south into a seemingly endless conflict.
In Pakistan, the 3–4 million Afghan refugees have offered a similarly large pool of highly motivated jihadist fighters, accurately described in Professor Thomas H. Johnson’s Narratives as comprising the great majority of the Taliban leadership, as well as Taliban fighters inside Afghanistan. For over three decades, Pakistan’s powerful military intelligence agency, the Inter-
Services Intelligence (ISI) directorate, with funding from Saudi Arabia and support from Pakistani extremist sects, has funneled young Afghan refugees through a network of radical madrasas inside Pakistan preaching obligatory Holy War, to be followed by covert military training in ISI-managed military camps, and subsequent movement to a fighting front, jihad, in Afghanistan. A roughly equal number of Pakistan Pashtuns in poverty-stricken, uneducated families on the Pakistan side of the border continue today to make that same journey under the banner of ISI-created Pakistani religious paramilitary forces—Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-i-Mohammed, Harakat ul-Mujahidin—all on the US government’s Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) list.
As indicated in this book, nearly the entire propaganda production platform for the Taliban’s information campaign carried out inside Afghanistan is located in Pakistan and overseen by ISI: the magazines Al Somood, In Fight, Shahamat, Elhan, Murchal; the monthly pamphlet Srak; and media studios and video production facilities of Alemarah, al Hijirat, and Mana-ul Jihad. Afghan Taliban media spokesmen inside Pakistan provide a Taliban interpretation of events and news releases about developments in the Afghan war to international as well as to local journalists. The media output of other radical Afghan insurgent groups operating from Pakistan—the anti-American firebrand Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and the brutal Haqqani Network—are also disseminated into Afghanistan and internationally from Pakistan, in most cases from the Peshawar region where their leaderships live and freely operate.
When I served as American Special Envoy to Afghanistan (1989–92), Hekmatyar regularly attacked the United States, equating it with the Soviet Union, in his official newspaper, Shahadat. Shahadat routinely lashed out at me as well for being “an uninvited guest with cheekiness, stubbornness,” and “implementing a satanic plan.” Today, Hekmatyar’s media empire inside Pakistan is considerably larger. In addition to Shahadat, it boasts three magazines, a second newspaper, a website, Twitter and Facebook online operations, and an official spokesman. Hekmatyar and the Taliban insurgent media outlets are in close touch with extremist Pakistani and Arab publications, including those operated by al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda affiliates, sharing and disseminating propaganda videos and printed materials with each other across Eurasia.
As is thoroughly documented in the pages of this unique book, the ISIsupported Afghan Taliban, Haqqani Network, and HIG informational campaigns mounted from Pakistan have proven far superior in quality, quantity, and effectiveness to those organized by the American Coalition and the Afghan government. In sum (and expanded on later), “the US military and the
Afghan government have continually failed to offer a credible narrative and stories that resonate with the Afghan people. The Taliban, on the other hand, have crafted a strong, simple, and culturally relevant IO (Information Operations) campaign to energize, coerce, and control the Afghan populace.”
Over the past nearly four decades, since the 1979 Soviet invasion, the Pakistan-fueled Afghan insurgency inside Afghanistan has transited through different military propaganda phases. Fluctuating information messaging has been closely aligned with adjustments in military operations and vice versa. As is well-documented in Taliban Narratives, the propaganda themes remained basically the same during the Soviet occupation (1979–89) and the post-9/11 American intervention in Afghanistan (October 2001-present). Taliban information operations aimed at mobilizing popular support behind the insurgency, motivating and recruiting fighters, have highlighted:
• The Muslim Brotherhood, Qutbist mandate making it obligatory on every Muslim to conduct violent jihad to defend Islam (the radical Islamist socalled sixth pillar of Islam);
• The call to emulate past Afghan defeats of foreign invaders, with a special accent on ethnic Pashtun historiography, traditions, values, and mythology toward that end;
• Afghan and Pashtun nationalism;
• Foreign sponsorship of an abusive, corrupt Afghan puppet government;
• Warnings to Afghans working in or supportive of the Afghan government and foreign occupiers.
The Mujahidin propaganda campaign during the anti-Soviet war changed along with military objectives when it became clear in early 1988 that the Soviets were leaving Afghanistan. ISI began preparations to install its favorite extremist, Hekmatyar, in Kabul. It shifted the great bulk of financial, propaganda assets, and CIA weapons supplies to Hekmatyar. Simultaneously, it drastically reduced support to major non-extremist Afghan commanders Ahmed Shah Masood, Abdul Haq, Haji Latif, and Ismael Khan. Together, moderate Afghan Mujahidin had inflicted the majority of casualties on Soviet forces during the anti-Soviet jihad. The Soviet departure led ISI to pivot from a defensive to an offensive posture to eliminate or degrade the moderates. On 9 July 1989, a Hekmatyar commander murdered thirty of Masood’s subcommanders in northern Afghanistan. Hekmatyar’s radio station in Pakistan blamed Masood. ISI maneuvering disrupted American efforts to investigate the massacre. A month later, Haji Latif, a prominent tribal moderate who had
been feuding with Hekmatyar, was poisoned near his base in southern Afghanistan. Many believed that Hekmatyar killed the renowned commander. ISI funds for moderate Mujahidin information operations dried up. ISI cut off support to Ismael Khan and Abdul Haq.
From Pakistan, Hekmatyar’s media promoted him as the top leader of the Mujahidin drive to topple the Najib regime which the Soviets had left behind in Kabul. This did not stop Masood from capturing Kabul in 1992 before Hekmatyar’s forces could get there. ISI assisted Hekmatyar in bombarding the city, killing thousands. In 1995, Pakistan switched its support from Hekmatyar to the Taliban as the most promising Afghan extremist vehicle to expel Masood from Kabul. By this time, an Afghan Muslim versus Afghan Muslim civil war had replaced the jihad against a foreign invader. The ideological solidarity that had unified the Mujahidin during the jihad was fast dissipating, resulting in a battlefield stalemate.
To gain the initiative and in an unusual departure from the Taliban’s radical Islamist messaging, Taliban propaganda featured the “return” of the secular and moderate ex-Pashtun king, Zahir Shah, then residing in Rome. Zahir Shah’s popularity throughout most of the Pashtun tribal belt in the south and east gave impetus to Taliban military progress against Masood’s Mujahidin forces in control of Kabul. Taliban formations carried aloof huge portraits of Zahir Shah as they marched through Pashtun provinces on the way to the capital. After Pakistani-assisted Taliban assaults forced Masood to abandon Kabul on 26 September 1996, the Taliban’s propaganda associating the Taliban with Zahir Shah quickly disappeared, replaced by a stream of religious fatwas establishing the rigid new Taliban order based on a strict, Wahhabi version of Qur’anic law. In early 1997, the Pakistani foreign minister nimbly compared the Taliban’s advent to the 1789 French Revolution and announced Pakistan’s diplomatic recognition of Mullah Omar’s Afghan emirate.
In the wake of the disastrous second Anglo-Afghan war (1879–81), Britain’s commander, Field Marshal Frederick Roberts, had suggested that, in the future, the British should seek out internal Afghan allies rather than unilaterally attempting again to invade the country:
• I feel sure I am right when I say that the less the Afghans see of us, the less they will dislike us.
• Should the Russians attempt to conquer Afghanistan, we should have a better chance of attaching the Afghans to our interests if we avoid all interference with them.
A century later, Soviet commanders in Afghanistan would encounter a similar Afghan religious–patriotic uprising reminiscent of the Roman writer Virgil’s comment in the Aeneid: “Their rage supplies them with weapons.” During the Soviet occupation, American Cold War strategists did not need to coordinate arms supplies to the Mujahidin with an informational PSYOP campaign. Afghan fury required no American encouragement. As with the covert weapons supplies to ISI, the Pakistanis ran the propaganda war, building up the al-Qaeda-connected radical Mujahidin groups, particularly Hekmatyar, at the expense of Mujahidin moderates. Washington lost interest in Afghanistan during the mid-1990s following the late 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union.
That left Pakistan with a free hand to shape an extremist sequel to the Afghan war in the form of the Taliban, while keeping outsiders duped or at bay about Islamabad’s intentions. US policy-makers ignored warnings from some scholars and diplomats that “Arab terrorist organizations … could shift their bases to Afghanistan” (Tomsen, The Wars of Afghanistan, p. 323). Outsourcing America’s Afghan policy to Pakistan backfired. Afghanistan became a launching pad for al-Qaeda attacks on the US, first targeting two American embassies in Africa (1998), then against the warship USS Cole off the Yemeni coast (2000), and again on 9/11 directly against the American homeland.
The post-9/11 American military intervention in Afghanistan in October 2001 drove the Taliban and Osama bin Laden’s Arab forces back to the Pakistani base areas from which they had emerged after the Soviet withdrawal. As widely accepted in hindsight today, the Pakistani commitment to cooperate in the struggle against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and Islamist terrorism proved duplicitous. ISI revamped the Taliban. It reorganized three jihadist fronts on the Pakistan side of the Afghan–Pakistani border: Mullah Omar’s Afghan Taliban above Quetta in the west, the Haqqani Network in the center, and Hekmatyar’s HIG on the western flank. The insurgency’s ultimate goal was to outlast the American will to conduct the war. A retired ISI director general predicted that the US would be gone in five years. A group of Pakistani generals decided in a private meeting that it would take ten. The US withdrew its combat forces after twelve years of inconclusive guerrilla warfare planned and supplied from Pakistani safe havens. A large-scale sophisticated Taliban propaganda campaign emanating from Pakistan, detailed at length in Taliban Narratives, reinforced the insurgency’s gradual expansion to most other regions of the country.
As of mid-2016, some 13,000 American-led Coalition troops are training and assisting the Afghan army and air force and conducting counter-terrorism operations. The Soviet military in the 1980s had only sporadically conducted cross-border air raids into Pakistan. The US adopted a more forward posture, hitting Taliban targets across the border in Pakistan, launching hundreds of drone strikes inside Pakistan’s tribal areas, with the silent compliance of Pakistan’s military. A drone strike on 21 May 2016 killed Taliban leader Mullah Mansour, traveling by car in Pakistan’s western Baluchistan province, undertaken without Pakistani clearance. US Special Forces raids have also periodically covertly penetrated Pakistani territory, including the 2 May 2011 killing of Osama bin Laden, also undertaken without notification to Pakistan.
There is much to be pessimistic about when looking at the situation in Afghanistan today. The Taliban have yet to take over a city and hold it, but the movement has expanded into many rural areas, especially in the Pashtun belt adjoining Pakistan and near Kabul. Haqqani Network suicide bombings rock Afghanistan’s capital. The Islamic State is establishing small footholds in the east and north-west. It attempts to create more bases across the Amu Darya in Central Asia. Iran and China oppose the continuing US presence in Afghanistan, as does the Taliban’s patron, Pakistan. The Afghan National Unity Government in Kabul is corrupt and inept. Ashraf Ghani is more concerned about keeping American pressure for reforms at arm’s length than governing well. The Ghani government’s poor image among Afghans reduces its potential to become an effective partner in the critical motivational contest for the Afghan mind. Another Vietnam policy failure is not out of the question.
On the positive side of the ledger, American and Coalition combat forces have been withdrawn. The Taliban message to end the American occupation is less credible. The conflict is now primarily an Afghan war: Afghan extremists based in Pakistan versus the anti-extremist government in Kabul. The Taliban are divided vertically and horizontally, tarnished with being the Pakistani proxy that they are. Soviet ally Najib skillfully divided the Mujahidin for three years after the Soviet departure had weakened the unifying call to jihad. It was the conclusion of the US–Soviet negative symmetry agreement depriving Najib of Soviet arms, not Mujahidin military pressure, that eventually precipitated his regime’s collapse in 1992. The US-led Coalition has apparently recognized that Afghanistan is just one theatre in the ongoing struggle across Asia and the Middle East against Islamist terrorism. It is likely to remain committed to a non-extremist outcome in Afghanistan.
Pakistani sponsorship of the Taliban is clearer than ever after the killing of Taliban leader Mullah Mansour. Rumors that the ISI murdered Mullah Omar and suppressed news about Omar’s demise for two years after his death had already stoked angry resentment in some Taliban ranks. The ISI’s dominant role in choosing first Mansour, then Haibatullah, to be the next Taliban emir, not to mention selecting their deputies, will likely heighten Taliban annoyance about Pakistan’s interference in Taliban leadership politics.
Inside Afghanistan, the Taliban record in ruling Afghanistan (1996–2001) has left a bitter legacy among most Afghans, especially the non-Pashtun minorities who make up a majority of the population. Should the Taliban again overrun Kabul, the Northern Alliance of mainly Tajik, Uzbek, and Hazara forces will fiercely resist Taliban expansion north of the Hindu Kush. Backing from Russia, Iran, and India would assist their capability to prevent a Taliban conquest of Afghanistan.
The most important challenges that the US, its Coalition, and Afghan partners must overcome are conveying a persuasive message to the Afghan population to buttress their military strategy; countering Taliban propaganda; and harvesting the many opportunities available to exploit Taliban and Pakistani vulnerabilities. Taliban Narratives methodically chronicles how and why the Taliban have to date “won the information war against the US coalition and the Afghan government”—or, paraphrasing Napoleon’s dictum, the battle for the Afghan mind. This sobering predicament confronted me during a 2012 military briefing on Afghanistan at a military base in the US. I asked a military officer why the traditional “strategic communications” topic had been dropped from the agenda. “Because it failed,” he replied. His answer stunned me. The Coalition’s eleven-year information effort, as depicted in Professor Johnson’s book, just “did not work.”
A fulsome description and assessment of what went wrong with the US attempt to win the hearts and minds of Afghans follows here in the pages of Taliban Narratives. Its conclusions and recommendations are based on fieldwork inside Afghanistan over a seven-year period by Professor Johnson and his two colleagues. They interviewed hundreds of Afghans and compiled thousands of documents, videos, and other originally-sourced materials. This book’s incisive analysis of Taliban and Pakistani vulnerabilities will prove invaluable in informing a future, more successful US strategy to counter the radical Islamist message, and not only in Afghanistan; for the ideological–military struggle between the majority moderate Afghan Muslims and the radical Islamist brand espoused by the Taliban and its offshoots will continue for decades in the Islamic world.
PREFACE1
In mid-September 2001, I was asked by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) to assist in the formulation of the United States’ initial “Information Operations” (IO) campaign in preparation for the US invasion of Afghanistan. The stated policy aim of this invasion was initially to pursue and destroy al-Qaeda, the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks on the United States. This initial goal would change significantly over the course of the war in Afghanistan to a primary focus on the destruction of the Taliban as well as nation-building. For three weeks I feverishly researched and worked on narratives that I believed would help tell the “story” of why the US military was attacking al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan. I was especially interested in the formulation of narratives and stories that I believed would resonate with the Afghan people in a nuanced way.
I had first traveled to Afghanistan in the mid-1980s during the Soviet occupation, and over the course of years I had the pleasure of visiting and meeting many Afghans, both rural and urban, during my numerous trips to the country. Having studied and written on Afghanistan for nearly two decades, I felt I had a fairly sophisticated knowledge of the country and its people. Yet, not expertly knowing their languages hindered my deep structural understanding of certain aspects of the country, cultures, and peoples. Nevertheless, I immersed myself in data and Information Operation’s ideas that I believed could be used effectively during our coming invasion of Afghanistan.
I was startled by the frazzled and hectic pace I found in OSD in preparation for our coming operations in Afghanistan. From endless meetings to running into numerous expatriate Afghans I had known for years walking and campaigning in the halls of the Pentagon, I was nearly overwhelmed by the sheer volume and variety of opinions expressed concerning the “best” way to explain our forthcoming actions to the Afghan people.
I was also unprepared for the lack of detailed and nuanced, substantive knowledge among military leaders and OSD personnel concerning the country and people which the US was about to attack. It was very evident that since the US had ended its considerable support of the Afghan Mujahidin and their anti-Soviet jihad (the largest intelligence covert program in US history) and our goal of “bleeding” the Soviets a decade earlier, our government had lost most of its legacy of information on Afghanistan. Moreover, the eventual withdrawal of Afghan support by both “superpowers” created a power vacuum that the Pakistan military had tried to exploit by using their Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) directive to sponsor the Mujahidin’s attempt to overthrow the post-Soviet Afghan government. From the relative importance of the Pashtun community in the governance of the country, to the biases of the Kabuli Afghan elite to the explicit make-up of the Northern Alliance, I was taken aback by the lack of up-to-date, relevant data on Afghanistan within OSD as well as with the military leadership. While I found more sophisticated knowledge concerning Afghanistan within the intelligence community members with whom I interacted, I also found their knowledge of the country lacking in important aspects, especially considering the immense Afghan knowledge I had witnessed in this community a decade earlier. I found myself agreeing with the many critics who argued that after the Soviets withdrew in defeat from Afghanistan in January 1989, the US basically abandoned and forgot about the country. And this had a significant impact on how the US approached their initial Afghan information campaign.
As the date for the US invasion neared, I had flag officers and senior civil servants standing over my shoulder as I prepared PowerPoint slides of possible information leaflets and word documents for possible broadcasts through EC 130E Commando Solo (at the time the US military’s only airborne psychological and information operations mission platform). It is actually interesting to note that while working on this initial Afghan information campaign, I was told that the initial air operations against al-Qaeda and the Taliban were supposed to commence on Wednesday 3 October 2001. However, because the initial IO leaflets and Commando Solo broadcasts had not been fully produced and vetted, the start of the war was delayed until Sunday 7 October 2001.
I spent the majority of my time developing messages and narratives aimed at the Afghan Pashtun population. While the Taliban at this time were almost exclusively Pashtun, I believed that the key to our information efforts should be directed at winning the trust and confidence of the Pashtuns, especially those rural Pashtuns I expected would eventually be central to our campaign
against al-Qaeda and the Taliban. In my opinion, the key to a successful Afghan IO campaign was to separate the rural Pashtun population from the Taliban and their draconian policies. Indeed, I believed that the best way to defeat al-Qaeda as well as the Taliban was to make them “irrelevant” to the Afghan villager.
From my perspective, the Taliban represented a political bastardization of traditional Pashtun village life. While the Talib (“seeker of knowledge, or student” in Arabic) has been an important fixture in society ever since Islam was introduced in the seventh century to the area of present-day Afghanistan, they had never been a formal political entity. For centuries Talibs traveled the countryside as ascetics, often living off the land and tithings from Afghan villagers, in search of religious “truth.” The Taliban (plural of Talib) would later become an extremely important part of the Afghan social fabric, running religious schools (madrasas), mosques, shrines, and various religious and social services, and serving as Mujahidin when necessary, but the Taliban had never represented an explicit Afghan political movement until 1994. Moreover, the vast majority of the Taliban foot soldiers had lived most, if not all their lives in refugee camps in Pakistan. Many had never spent time in an Afghan village and were not familiar with many of the key aspects of rural Afghan village politics and culture, including Pashtunwali (literally the “way of the Pashtun”: the unwritten rules that drive and significantly influence a Pashtun’s life, honor, and conflict resolution, especially in rural Afghanistan). The violence of the Afghan civil war after the superpowers left Afghanistan, and the criminality of supposed Mujahidin turned warlords who raped, plundered, and extracted from the war-weary Afghan population between 1992 and1994, resulted in the political formulation of the Taliban, which was not only a reaction to the criminal warlords, but also represented a reactionary Deobandi (a revivalist movement within Sunni, primarily Hanafi) Islamist movement. Many of the early Taliban leaders and soldiers had fought the Soviets in the Yunas Khalis’ Hezb-e-Islami (“Party of Islam”) party (HIK) or Harakat-i-Inqilab-iIslami (Islamic Revolution Movement) led by Mohammad Nabi Mohammadi. Due to their combination of fundamentalist Deobandi Islam and Pashtunwali, although many of the Taliban’s domestic policies were often based on local customs in the guise of religion, not all Taliban policies were locally based. The Taliban’s hostility to orchestrated music and Sufism, for example, was in stark contrast to rural Afghan cultural norms and practices. The Taliban also strictly segregated the sexes (known as purdah). While this is an established practice throughout much of rural (particularly Pashtun)
Another random document with no related content on Scribd:
reticent stranger. Allen had struck Pawtuxet people as a vaguely unnatural being and there was an universal belief that his thick Vandyke beard was either dyed or false—a belief conclusively upheld by the finding of such a false beard, together with a heavy pair of dark glasses, in his room at the fateful bungalow His voice, Mr Ward could well testify from his one telephone conversation, had a depth and hollowness that could not be forgotten; and his glance seemed malign even through his smoked and horn-rimmed glasses. One shopkeeper, in the course of negotiations, had seen a specimen of his handwriting and declared it was very queer and crabbed; this being confirmed by penciled notes of no clear meaning found in his room and identified by the merchant.
In connection with the vampirism ructions of the preceding summer, a majority of the gossips believed that Allen rather than Ward was the actual vampire. Statements were also obtained from the officials who had visited the bungalow after the unpleasant incident of the motor truck robbery. They had felt less of the sinister in Dr. Allen, but had recognized him as the dominant figure in the queer shadowy cottage. The place had been too dark for them to observe him clearly, but they would know him again if they saw him. His beard had looked odd, and they thought he had some slight scar above his dark spectacled right eye. As for the search of Allen's room, it yielded nothing definite save the beard and glasses, and several penciled notes in a crabbed writing, which Willett at once saw was identical with that shared by the old Curwen manuscripts and by the voluminous recent notes of young Ward found in the vanished catacombs of horror.
Dr. Willett and Mr. Ward caught something of a profound, subtle, and insidious cosmic fear from this data as it was gradually unfolded, and almost trembled in following up the vague, mad thought which had simultaneously reached their minds. The false beard and glasses, the crabbed Curwen penmanship—the old portrait and its tiny scar—and the altered youth in the hospital with such a scar—that deep, hollow voice on the telephone—was it not of this that Mr. Ward was reminded when his son barked forth those pitiable tones to which he now claimed to be reduced? Who had ever seen Charles and Allen together? Yes, some officials had once, but who later on? Was it not when Allen left that Charles suddenly lost his growing fright and
began to live wholly at the bungalow? Curwen—Allen—Ward—in what blasphemous and abominable fusion had two ages and two persons become involved? That damnable resemblance of the picture to Charles—had it not used to stare and stare, and follow the boy around the room with its eyes? Why, too, did both Allen and Charles copy Joseph Curwen's handwriting, even when alone and off guard? And then the frightful work of those people—the lost crypt of horrors that had aged the doctor overnight; the starved monsters in the noisome pits; the awful formula which had yielded such nameless results; the message in minuscules found in Willett's pocket; the papers and the letters and all the talk of graves and "salts" and discoveries—whither did everything lead? In the end Mr. Ward did the most sensible thing. Steeling himself against any realization of why he did it, he gave the detectives an article to be shewn to such Pawtuxet shopkeepers as had seen the portentous Dr. Allen. That article was a photograph of his luckless son, on which he now carefully drew in ink the pair of heavy glasses and the black pointed beard, which the men had brought from Allen's room.
For two hours he waited with the doctor in the oppressive house where fear and miasma were slowly gathering as the empty panel in the upstairs library leered and leered and leered. Then the men returned. Yes, the altered photograph was a very passable likeness of Dr Allen Mr Ward turned pale, and Willett wiped a suddenly dampened brow with his handkerchief. Allen—Ward—Curwen—it was becoming too hideous for coherent thought. What had the boy called out of the void, and what had it done to him? What really had happened from first to last? Who was this Allen who sought to kill Charles as too "squeamish," and why had his destined victim said in the postscript to that frantic letter that he must be so completely obliterated in acid? Why, too, had the minuscule message, of whose origin no one dared think, said that "Curwen" must be likewise obliterated? What was the change, and when had the final stage occurred? That day when his frantic note was received—he had been nervous all the morning, then there was an alteration. He had slipped out unseen and swaggered boldly in past the men hired to guard him. That was the time, when he was out. But no—had he not cried out in terror as he entered his study—this very room? What had he found
there? Or wait—what had found him? That simulacrum which brushed boldly in without having been seen to go—was that an alien shadow and a horror forcing itself upon a trembling figure which had never gone out at all? Had not the butler spoken of queer noises?
Willett rang for the man and asked him some low-toned questions. It had, surely enough, been a bad business. There had been noises—a cry, a gasp, a choking, and a sort of clattering or creaking or thumping, or all of these. And Mr. Charles was not the same when he stalked out without a word. The butler shivered as he spoke, and sniffed at the heavy air that blew down from some open window upstairs. Terror had settled definitely upon the house, and only the businesslike detectives failed to imbibe a full measure of it. Even they were restless, for this case had held vague elements in the background which pleased them not at all. Dr. Willett was thinking deeply and rapidly, and his thoughts were terrible ones Now and then he would almost break into muttering as he ran over in his head a new, appalling, and increasingly conclusive chain of nightmare happenings.
Then Mr. Ward made a sign that the conference was over, and everyone save him and the doctor left the room. It was noon now, but shadows as of coming night seemed to engulf the phantom-haunted mansion. Willett began talking very seriously to his host, and urged that he leave a great deal of the future investigation to him. There would be, he predicted, certain obnoxious elements which a friend could bear better than a relative. As family physician he must have a free hand, and the first thing he required was a period alone and undisturbed in the abandoned library upstairs, where the ancient overmantel had gathered about itself an aura of noisome horror more intense than when Joseph Curwen's features themselves glanced slyly down from the painted panel.
Mr. Ward, dazed by the flood of grotesque morbidities and unthinkably maddening suggestions that poured in upon him from every side, could only acquiesce; and half an hour later the doctor
was locked in the shunned room with the paneling from Olney Court. The father, listening outside, heard fumbling sounds of moving and rummaging as the moments passed; and finally a wrench and a creak, as if a tight cupboard door were being opened. Then there was a muffled cry, a kind of snorting choke, and a hasty slamming of whatever had been opened. Almost at once the key rattled and Willett appeared in the hall, haggard and ghastly, and demanding wood for the real fireplace on the south wall of the room. The furnace was not enough, he said; and the electric log had little practical use. Longing yet not daring to ask questions, Mr. Ward gave the requisite orders and a man brought some stout pine logs, shuddering as he entered the tainted air of the library to place them in the grate. Willett meanwhile had gone up to the dismantled laboratory and brought down a few odds and ends not included in the moving of the July before. They were in a covered basket, and Mr. Ward never saw what they were.
Then the doctor locked himself up in the library once more, and by the clouds of smoke which rolled down past the windows from the chimney it was known that he had lighted the fire. Later, after a great rustling of newspapers, that odd wrench and creaking were heard again; followed by a thumping which none of the eavesdroppers liked. Thereafter two suppressed cries of Willett's were heard, and hard upon these came a swishing rustle of indefinable hatefulness. Finally the smoke that the wind beat down from the chimney grew very dark and acrid, and everyone wished that the weather had spared them this choking and venomous inundation of peculiar fumes. Mr. Ward's head reeled, and the servants all clustered together in a knot to watch the horrible black smoke swoop down. After an age of waiting the vapors seemed to lighten, and half-formless sounds of scraping, sweeping, and other minor operations were heard behind the bolted door. And at last, after the slamming of some cupboard within, Willett made his appearance, sad, pale and haggard, and bearing the clothdraped basket he had taken from the upstairs laboratory. He had left the window open, and into that once accursed room was pouring a wealth of pure, wholesome air to mix with a queer new smell of disinfectants. The ancient overmantel still lingered; but it seemed robbed of malignity now, and rose as calm and stately in its white
paneling as if it had never borne the picture of Joseph Curwen. Night was coming on, yet this time its shadows held no latent fright, but only a gentle melancholy. Of what he had done the doctor would never speak. To Mr. Ward he said, "I can answer no questions, but I will say that there are different kinds of magic. I have made a great purgation. Those in this house will sleep the better for it."
That Dr. Willett's "purgation" had been an ordeal almost as nerveracking in its way as his hideous wandering in the vanished crypt is shewn by the fact that the elderly physician gave out completely as soon as he reached home that evening. For three days he rested constantly in his room, though servants later muttered something about having heard him after midnight on Wednesday, when the outer door softly opened, and closed with phenomenal softness. Servants' imaginations, fortunately, are limited, else comment might have been excited by an item in Thursday's Evening Bulletin which ran as follows:
North End Ghouls Again Active
After a lull of ten months since the dastardly vandalism in the Weeden lot at the North Burial Ground, a nocturnal prowler was glimpsed early this morning in the same cemetery by Robert Hart, the night watchman. Happening to glance for a moment from his shelter at about two a.m., Hart observed a glow of a lantern or pocket torch not far to the northward, and upon opening the door detected the figure of a man with a trowel very plainly silhouetted against a nearby electric light. At once starting in pursuit, he saw the figure dart hurriedly toward the main entrance, gaining the street and losing himself among the shadows before approach or capture was possible.
Like the first of the ghouls active during the past year, this intruder had done no real damage before detection. A vacant part of the Ward lot shewed signs of a little superficial digging, but nothing even nearly
the size of a grave had been attempted, and no previous grave had been disturbed.
Hart, who cannot describe the prowler except as a small man probably having a full beard, inclines to the view that all three of the digging incidents have a common source; but police from the Second Station think otherwise on account of the savage nature of the second incident, where an ancient coffin was removed and its headstone violently shattered.
The first of the incidents, in which it is thought an attempt to bury something was frustrated, occurred a year ago last March, and has been attributed to bootleggers seeking a cache. It is possible, says Sergeant Riley, that this third affair is of similar nature. Officers at the Second Station are taking especial pains to capture the gang of miscreants responsible for these repeated outrages.
All day Thursday Dr. Willett rested as if recuperating from something past or nerving himself for something to come. In the evening he wrote a note to Mr. Ward, which was delivered the next morning and which caused the half-dazed parent to ponder long and deeply Mr Ward had not been able to go down to business since the shock of Monday with its baffling reports and its sinister "purgation," but he found something calming about the doctor's letter in spite of the despair it seemed to promise and the fresh mysteries it seemed to evoke.
10 Barnes St., Providence, R. I., April 12, 1928.
Dear Theodore:
I feel that I must say a word to you before doing what I am going to do tomorrow. It will conclude the terrible business we have been going through (for I feel that no spade is ever likely to reach that monstrous place we know of), but I'm afraid it won't set your mind at rest unless I expressly assure you how very conclusive it is.
You have known me ever since you were a small boy, so I think you will not distrust me when I hint that some matters are best left
undecided and unexplored. It is better that you attempt no further speculation as to Charles's case, and almost imperative that you tell his mother nothing more than she already suspects. When I call on you tomorrow Charles will have escaped. That is all which need remain in anyone's mind. He was mad, and he escaped. So don't ask me any questions when I call. It may be that something will go wrong, but I'll tell you if it does. I don't think it will. There will be nothing more to worry about, for Charles will be very, very safe. He is now—safer than you dream. You need hold no fears about Allen, and who or what he is. He forms as much a part of the past as Joseph Curwen's picture, and when I ring your doorbell you may feel certain that there is no such person. And what wrote that minuscule message will never trouble you or yours.
But you must steel yourself to melancholy, and prepare your wife to do the same. I must tell you frankly that Charles's escape will not mean his restoration to you. He has been afflicted with a peculiar disease, as you must realize from the subtle physical as well as mental changes in him, and you must not hope to see him again. He stumbled on things no mortal ought ever to know, and reached back through the years as no one ever should reach; and something came out of those years to engulf him.
And now comes the matter in which I must ask you to trust me most of all. For there will be, indeed, no uncertainty about Charles's fate. In about a year, say, you can if you wish devise a suitable account of the end, for the boy will be no more. You can put up a stone in your lot at the North Burial ground exactly ten feet west of your father's and facing the same way, and that will mark the true resting-place of your son. Nor need you fear that it will mark any abnormality or changeling. The ashes in that grave will be those of your own unaltered bone and sinew—of the real Charles Dexter Ward whose mind you watched from infancy—the real Charles with the olive-mark on his hip and without the black witch-mark on his chest or the pit on his forehead. The Charles who never did actual evil, and who will have paid with his life for his "squeamishness."
That is all. Charles will have escaped, and a year from now you can put up his stone. Do not question me tomorrow. And believe that the
honour of your ancient family remains untainted now, as it has been at all times in the past.
With profoundest sympathy, and exhortations to fortitude, calmness, and resignation, I am ever
Sincerely your friend, Marinus B. Willett.
So on the morning of Friday, April 13, 1928, Marinus Bicknell Willett visited the room of Charles Dexter Ward at Dr. Waite's private hospital on Conanicut Island. After the interchange of a few strained formalities, a new element of constraint crept in, as Ward seemed to read behind the doctor's masklike face a terrible purpose which had never been there before.
Ward actually turned pale, and the doctor was the first to speak. "More," he said, "has been found out, and I must warn you fairly that a reckoning is due."
"Digging again, and coming upon more poor starving pets?" was the ironic reply. It was evident that the youth meant to shew bravado to the last.
"No," Willett slowly rejoined, "this time I did not have to dig. We have had men looking up Dr. Allen, and they found the false beard and spectacles in the bungalow!"
"Excellent," commented the disquieted host in an effort to be wittily insulting, "and I trust they proved more becoming than the beard and glasses you now have on!"
"They would become you very well," came the even and studied response, "as indeed they seem to have done."
As Willett said this, it almost seemed as though a cloud passed over the sun; though there was no change in the shadows on the floor. Then Ward ventured:
"And is this what asks so hotly for a reckoning? Suppose a man does find it now and then useful to be twofold?"
"No," said Willett gravely, "again you are wrong. It is no business of mine if any man seeks duality; provided he has any right to exist at all, and provided he does not destroy what called him out of space."
Ward now started violently. "Well, Sir, what have ye found, and what d'ye want with me?"
The doctor let a little time elapse before replying, as if choosing his words for an effective answer.
"I have found," he finally intoned, "something in a cupboard behind an ancient overmantel where a picture once was, and I have burned it and buried the ashes where the grave of Charles Dexter Ward ought to be."
The madman choked and sprang from the chair in which he had been sitting:
"Damn ye, who did ye tell—and who'll believe it was he after these full two months, with me alive? What d'ye mean to do?"
Willett, though a small man, actually took on a kind of judicial majesty as he calmed the patient with a gesture.
"I have told no one. This is no common case—it is a madness out of time and a horror from beyond the spheres which no police or lawyers or courts or alienists could ever fathom or grapple with. You cannot deceive me, Joseph Curwen, for I know that your accursed magic is true!
"I know how you wove the spell that brooded outside the years and fastened on your double and descendant; I know how you drew him into the past and got him to raise you up from your detestable grave; I know how he kept you hidden in his laboratory while you studied modern things and roved abroad as a vampire by night, and how you later shewed yourself in beard and glasses that no one might wonder at your godless likeness to him; I know what you resolved to do when he balked at your monstrous rifling of the world's tombs, and at what you planned afterward, and I know how you did it.
"You left off your beard and glasses and fooled the guards around the house. They thought it was he who went in, and they thought it was
he who came out when you had strangled and hidden him. But you hadn't reckoned on the different contacts of two minds. You were a fool, Curwen, to fancy that a mere visual identity would be enough. Why didn't you think of the speech and the voice and the handwriting? It hasn't worked, you see, after all. You know better than I who or what wrote that message in minuscules, but I will warn you it was not written in vain. There are abominations and blasphemies which must be stamped out, and I believe that the writer of those words will attend to Orne and Hutchinson. One of those creatures wrote you once, 'do not call up any that you cannot put down.' Curwen, a man can't tamper with Nature beyond certain limits, and every horror you have woven will rise up to wipe you out."
But here the doctor was cut short by a convulsive cry from the creature before him. Hopelessly at bay, weaponless, and knowing that any show of physical violence would bring a score of attendants to the doctor's rescue, Joseph Curwen had recourse to his one ancient ally, and began a series of cabalistic motions with his forefingers as his deep, hollow voice, now unconcealed by feigned hoarseness, bellowed out the opening words of a terrible formula.
But Willett was too quick for him. Even as the dogs in the yard outside began to howl, and even as a chill wind sprang suddenly up from the bay, the doctor commenced the solemn and measured intonation of that which he had meant all along to recite. An eye for an eye—magic for magic—let the outcome shew how well the lesson of the abyss had been learned! So in a clear voice Marinus Bicknell Willett began the second of that pair of formulae whose first had raised the writer of those minuscules—the cryptic invocation whose heading was the Dragon's Tail, sign of the descending node—
At the very first word from Willett's mouth the previously commenced formula of the patient stopped short. Unable to speak, the monster made wild motions with his arms until they too were arrested. When the awful name of Yog-Sothoth was uttered, the hideous change began. It was not merely a dissolution, but rather a transformation or recapitulation; and Willett shut his eyes lest he faint before the rest of the incantation could be pronounced.
But he did not faint, and that man of unholy centuries and forbidden secrets never troubled the world again. The madness out of time had subsided, and the case of Charles Dexter Ward was closed. Opening his eyes before staggering out of that room of horror, Dr. Willett saw that what he had kept in memory had not been kept amiss. There had, as he had predicted, been no need for acids. For like his accursed picture a year before, Joseph Curwen now lay scattered on the floor as a thin coating of fine bluish-gray dust.
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE CASE OF CHARLES DEXTER WARD ***
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
START: FULL LICENSE
THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”
• You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.
• You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
1.F.
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and
expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™
Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
