MOPAN'S effectiveness
ternal studies from the development co-ordination office (DCO) and from the office of internal oversight services (OIOS). • MOPAN also put an extra emphasis on timeliness and buy-in. One of the MOPAN study experts was also involved in the UNDG review of the RC system. This approach helped to “build bridges” between MOPAN and the UN and to disseminate the study findings in the UNSG. Furthermore, a preliminary version was sent to MOPAN members and to the UN in April 2021, before the ECOSOC meeting at which the reform was to be discussed. DCO has been using the report in its dialogue with MOPAN member countries about maintaining or increasing their contribution to the RC system. At this stage, however, this funding is not yet secured.
Table 15: Use of the UNDS study Use… In informing the UNSG’s review of the RC system
In helping DCO engage in dialogue on the funding of the RC system with MOPAN member states
Depends on •
Capacity to disseminate preliminary findings in a timely manner
•
Consistency of MOPAN’s findings with UN DCO and OIOS internal studies
•
Level of buy-in in the UNSG
•
MOPAN’s independence from the UN
•
MOPAN member states knowledge about the analytical study
Main findings • SEAH is an example of an alternative process by which MOPAN has contributed to the development of performance indicators and standards and thus to multilateral effectiveness. MOs were involved in developing the indicators and standards, are persuaded by the framework, which addresses a pressing issue, and have been adopting it steadily. • The UNDS study was influential on the very specific topic of reinvigorating the RC system. MOPAN emphasised a timely delivery and worked to get buy-in from key users, which led the UNSG to use the substance of the report and to convince members to secure the funding of the RC system.
86
