Heavyweights: ASNI C Board, College Senate h) \ 111..t Cut)
The AS'JIC Student Board pa»cd a resolution a1 11s Feb 18 me1:ung 10 oppose a facuhy commiuce mo\C~ to maease its ,01ing clout in the College Senate-at ~tudent expense. Fre\hman Sen. Ncw1on Hill introduced the re5olu11on m roponse 10 a proposed re,ision of 1hc 1'1C F3cult> Cons11tution and Bylaw·s that would increa,e an already weighted faculty voung bl<xk m 1hc senate. The student bod~· would lose one of their 1hrct ,c:natonal seats 1f the proro~al i\ adop1ed In add111on 10 ~h1f1mg a ho,t of broadly-worded d1<cre11onary power) 10 the faculty block. the re, tS1on would altc:r ,enate composition a~ follow~ . .. increase facult> membership from 66 10 72 pcrccn1 --mainuun administrative ,upporl mc:mbersh1p at I.I percent --reduce student membership from 20 10 14 percent
Ed ~fcOoaald pbo10
Kickin ' back L)'nn Bomlll and T om Rlct 11kt
Ll m t'
In repr~n1a1i~t' terms, the faculty hold~ senate ,eats in a r:itio of one per nine 1eachcr~: admimma1i"e support pc~onnel ore represented 111 a ra110 of I: 17; student representa11on i~ I :666 and would mc1ch to I 1.000 under the faculty proposal. according to srudent obser,er Bob Hol\tein. In the course oi di\cu~ing the board's resolution. actini; president Bob Stull quoted ins1ructor Bob Kabler as telling the Administrative Curriculum Coun.::il that ~,udents are not rcsp()nsible nor reliable enough [to <.er.eon 1he College Senate) and didn't dcser\'e the repre\eotation the} already ha"e. In a sub~quent tnten ic~ with Kabltr. he confirmed hi} statement. but emphasized that he does not rc-gard all student~ as irresponsible. He pomted 10 a hastory ot student absenteeism on the College Senate. continued on Page 3
ou t Monda) 10 ~Jo>
lht
sprin1-m, ,
Ltmptl'llfllft.
Cardinal matmen are best • zn nation.
Live area comedy lights
stt Page 17
stt Page 7
up
local lounge.
Letter writers respond •
in
full force. see Pages 5, 6