Mount Holyoke News — Nov. 12, 2021

Page 1

Mount Holyoke News AN INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER SINCE 1917 FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2021

MOUNTHOLYOKENEWS.COM

Mount Holyoke commits to land acknowledgment, repatriation BY HOPE FRANCES SIMPSON ’24 STAFF WRITER

Content warning: this article discusses anti-Indigenous violence. Beginning this semester, a land acknowledgment recognizing the Indigenous nations which once occupied the land currently owned by Mount Holyoke College must be given before every public event at Mount Holyoke. As the College takes steps to repair its relationship to Indigenous communities both on and off campus, the institution’s history of anti-Indigenous acts has resurfaced. Earlier this month, the College repatriated Indigenous remains that had previously been in their possession. As the College reckons with this and other past violences this National Indigenous Heritage Month, some members of the Mount Holyoke community are calling for further action and accountability.

Land Acknowledgment

According to Kijua Sanders-McMurtry, vice president of equity and inclusion, the idea for a required land acknowledgment started in 2019. The Indigenous Cultural Student Association, an unofficial student organization, met with President Sonya Stephens, as well as Sanders-McMurtry and Lenora Riley, who were working for the president’s office at the time. The group presented a list of concerns, including a request for support for the Zowie Banteah Center and more Indigenous scholar speaking events. The land acknowledgment was a key topic they brought to Stephens’ attention. Regarding the land acknowledgment, Juliette Gagnon Strong Heart ’24, assistant for the Zowie Banteah Cultural Center, said, “It was a simple joy for me, because I was like, ‘oh my god that’s the first time I think I’ve ever seen someone want to do that, or even recognize that, that’s important.’”

“[The group] saw that as something they felt very strongly we should be doing and we had a dialogue,” Sanders-McMurtry said. “It was beautiful.” According to Sanders-McMurtry, the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion worked with Indigenous scholars to further discuss land acknowledgment. They spoke with educator and activist Claudia Fox Tree, who works with the Massachusetts Center for Native American Awareness. Fox Tree did two teaching sessions with the College cabinet, according to Sanders-McMurtry: one on implicit bias around Indigenous people and another on understanding Native monuments, history and legacy. Sanders-McMurty pointed out that in North America, there is a lack of education around Indigenous terminology, tribes and traditions. Therefore, it was important that the College include things like proper pronunciation within the land acknowledgment. Gagnon Strong Heart emphasized the importance of learning the specifics of different Indigenous identities and not treating all nations as one homogenised group. “Using native terms that we use to define ourselves is very important. Also I think it just brings somebody’s identity up further than just saying Indigenous people or Native American. I think that’s a step towards dismantling common stereotypes about Indigenous people that are totally untrue,” she said. Sanders-McMurtry also emphasised the importance of the land acknowledgment from an educational stance. “We’re just trying to make sure that everywhere it should live, it will live. None of our work is meant to be punitive, but there is an accountability process to all of our work,” she said. In addition, Sanders-McMurtry emphasized that the land acknowl-

Everything Was Already Loved: Critical Conceptions of Land in the K-12 Curriculum.” It will be a virtual event and open to the public. On Nov. 30 at 7 p.m., Larry Spotted Crow Mann of the Nipmuc Nation is giving a talk called “We Are Still Here, We Are the Story and We Are the Land: Honoring the Past, Present and Future of the Indigenous People of Western Massachusetts.” During this event, the College also plans to officially announce the repatriation of the Indigenous remains, accordinging to Sanders-McMurtry. The locations for both of these speaking events are still to be announced.

National Indigenous Heritage Month

Photo by Tzav Harrel ’24 At senate on Nov. 10, Kim Kindred FP ’24 read Mount Holyoke’s official land acknowledgment.

edgment is just the first step and that the College still has a lot of work to do.

Repatriation

Last month, on Oct. 16, human remains of an Indigenous person that had been in Mount Holyoke’s possession were repatriated. According to Sanders-McMurtry the remains were claimed by the Stockbridge-Munsee community, located in the Stockbridge area of Western Massachusetts. In 1990, the U.S. government passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, requiring all Indigenous remains in the possession of museums and other institutions to be repatriated back to Indigenous nations and organizations. Despite this, more than 116,000 remains have yet to be repatriated. As The New York Times reported in August, the Biden administration has recently made regulatory changes to the law to close loopholes and streamline the process of repatriation. The College’s decision to participate in repatriation came after

these adjustments. Gagnon Strong Heart emphasised that burials are sacred. According to her, exhuming remains and putting artifacts in museums without tribal consent is “an encroachment on the preservation of the piece that was in that space for a purpose.” Gagnon Strong Heart appreciated that the College repatriated the remains. “My assumption is when people don’t know the importance or how sacred something is they don’t know what to do with it,” she said. She stressed the importance of focusing on solutions, rather than blame. “Blaming someone about something doesn’t change the fact that [these items are] still in a museum,” she said. The College plans to have more Indigenous scholars speak at campus events. Within the month of November, there will be two different speakers. On Nov. 15, Dr. Leilani Sabzalian of the Aliituq people will be speaking at 7 p.m. Her talk is titled, “Nothing Was Ever Discovered,

The Zowie Banteah center will be moved to another location, to be determined, while improvements on the space are made. Gagnon Strong Heart said she hopes to make the Zowie Banteah Center a place where Indigenous students can form a community, but also where non-Indigenous students can educate themselves. She has noticed that non-Indigenous students are often uncomfortable discussing Indigeneity. “It’s important to talk about these things so that we can kind of get rid of that and be more comfortable talking about these issues, so that we can actually put things like land acknowledgment to work,” Gagnon Strong Heart said. While November is National Indigenous Heritage Month, Sanders-McMurtry said the importance of the College’s connection to Indigenous history needs to be incorporated into the school’s traditions alongside Mountain Day, Founder’s Day and other annual events at the College. Students with questions and concerns regarding the College’s plans for National Indigenous Heritage Month can contact the DEI office.

Student raises concerns over possible false positive COVID-19 tests of receiving academic accommodations during their quarantine period. According to an email that Durand shared with the Mount Holyoke News, they received correspondence from their academic dean stating that they had contacted all of Durand’s professors and would grant them access to course notes upon request for any courses that were staffed by a note-taker. “I emailed her back that day and I said I would love to have the notes for the classes. Some of my classes were online. Some of [my professors] barely had contact with me,” Durand said. Despite their written request, Durand said that they did not gain access to the notes for their course until after they had returned to campus from quarantine.

COVID-19 safety

Photo courtesy of Tate Durand ’23 Durand recieved a negative rapid test despite getting a postive PCR result test from the College.

BY MARIAM KEITA ’24 MANAGING EDITOR OF WEB

Oct. 23 started as a regular day for Tate Durand ’23. They woke up, attended a friend’s birthday breakfast, then returned to their on-campus residence for a nap. However, when they rose to several missed calls from the health services center, they immediately had a strong suspicion that they had tested positive for COVID-19. According to Durand, when they returned the missed calls, they were told that, due to the fact that they live in close proximity to the College, they were offered the chance to pack their belongings and quarantine at home. Alternatively, they could choose to stay in Mount Holyoke’s designated student isolation housing. “I chose not to go because my friend had an awful experience with them. So I didn’t want to stay on campus just in case I did have symptoms at some point,” Durand said. Instead, Durand, who lives in Connecticut, packed up their things and drove themselves home.

u

2

“My parents didn’t answer the phone for a good 30 minutes while I was packing my bags frantically and sobbing,” Durand said.

Contract tracing

Upon arriving in Connecticut, Durand recalled receiving a phone call from the College’s contract tracing team asking them to list and spell the names of those with whom they had been in recent contact. However, Durand later heard from a friend whom they had named that no one from the contract tracing team reached out to the close contacts for at least five days after they received their positive test results. “The thing that most agitated me about [the College’s COVID-19 protocol] was contact tracing,” Durand said. “I feel like this is important for the general college community to know because it was so fucked up. Excuse my language, but they contact-traced me on Saturday night and no one was contacted until after one of my friends personally went to the Health Center and was like ‘Why have we not been contacted?’” Additionally, Durand described their frustration with the process

FEATURES: Highlighting study spots

u

3

Durand is no stranger to the threat of COVID-19. Last school year, Durand chose to take a gap year from Mount Holyoke. The junior, who was originally in the class of 2022, spent their time working what they called “odd jobs,” including childcare roles where children were not required to mask, and managing a Dunkin’ Donuts, which was considered frontline work at the beginning of the pandemic. Despite the high risk nature of their work, Durand never once tested positive for COVID-19. “It shocked me because I was working one-on-one with kids who were never vaccinated, with no masks on. I was working face-toface, like food service work. And also at one point my entire family got it and I was living in the same house as them and I didn’’t get it. I did not get it until being back on campus and I was very shocked by the fact that I did not get it but I was regularly testing during those times [before returning to campus],” Durand said. Outside of working, Durand spent much of their time in the house in a tight bubble with their family. They would also get tested for COVID-19 regularly to help mitigate the risk of bringing the virus home to their family. “We were very in the house until

we were vaccinated,” Durand said. “I didn’t want to come back with it and give it to my mom because she’s heavily immunocompromised. After … my whole family was [vaccinated], it was more so for my own safety of like, knowing if I was spreading [COVID-19], because I was especially nervous about that.”

Testing program

Earlier this semester, Durand was a close contact to a friend who contracted symptomatic COVID-19, paired with their own experiences upon testing positive for the virus in October, Durand also lost confidence in the College’s asymptomatic testing program. “I’m less comfortable with their testing policy because I know now that part of their testing policy is after you test positive, you don’t have to test positive for another three months, basically,” Durand said. According to Durand, they were told by the College’s Health Center that those who test positive are asked not to participate in the testing program for a full 90 days after their first positive test due to the potential for testing positive again even after the contagion period has passed. “That, I think, is the part about their testing policy that scares me the most. There’s no confirmation of if it was a true positive. There’s not a second chance of making sure,” Durand said. “I didn’t have any symptoms at all. Like not even a cough or a sniffle or a fever. [That was] when I started to get kind of skeptical of it.” After going home to self-isolate, Durand decided to get tested independently. When they tested again, the results of their rapid COVID-19 test came back negative. “I decided to take a PCR. [After] the rapid test I was like ‘Oh, my viral load might just be low,’ but then my friends also were like ‘You should take a PCR if you have no symptoms at all’, and so I did independently go and take a PCR,” Durand said. When the results of their independent PCR test also came back negative, Durand began to doubt whether or not they were truly infected with the virus.

OPINION: Sustainability transparency

u

7

“I tested negative two days after a positive and I was like what’s going on here?” Durand asked. Soon, they got back into contact with a staff member from Health Services to notify them of the negative test. While, according to Durand, the staff member was unable to answer their questions, they were able to speak with the Health Center’s department head. “The department had told me that I still had to stay for the duration of my quarantine at my house, even if I tested negative and that I would not have to test when I got back on campus. Even if I tested negative then because the viral load might have just been low at the time that I took my PCR test,” Durand said. Although they conceded that they may have actually had COVID-19, Durand expressed concerns about being removed from the College’s testing program — particularly if their viral load was so low that it failed to trigger a positive PCR test result a few days after their initial positive test. “I tested negative three days after [my first positive], I should be able to test [in the College’s testing program] again if I already tested negative from the same exact viral load that tested positive that day,” Durand said. Another concern that Durand raised was the potential for someone to receive a false positive through the College’s testing program, stop testing on campus, and then contract COVID-19 within the 90-day window that would then go undetected. “I also think that they should have it as a note on your file that you did test positive once before,” Durand said. “Some people might have heavy symptoms and have definitely had COVID[-19]. For cases like mine, where I had no symptoms and it could have very well been a false positive, they should be testing again after that first positive, because it could have been false.” Regardless of the College’s guidelines, Durand said that they still plan to continue testing themselves for COVID-19 weekly, outside of the College’s testing program.

SPORTS: GOTW: Rugby ends season


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.