Mount Holyoke News AN INDEPENDENT STUDENT NEWSPAPER SINCE 1917 MOUNTHOLYOKENEWS.COM
FRIDAY, APRIL 29, 2022
Mount Holyoke Review celebrates Mount Holyoke reinstates publication of first in-print issue isolation in place policy BY MARIAM KEITA ’24 MANAGING EDITOR OF WEB
Photos by Ali Meizels ’23 Left: Danyah Shaikh ’25 reads a poem about her senior skip day in high school, published in the Mount Holyoke Review’s latest edition. Right: Morgan Sammut ’22 performs their newly published writing, an interactive prose piece in the format of a personality quiz, with audience participation.
BY SAMMI CRAIG ’23 STAFF WRITER
On April 25, students gathered in the New York room of Mary Lyon Hall to celebrate the third publication of the Mount Holyoke Review, the College’s student-run literary magazine. Hard copies of the Review were distributed for personal ownership and for attendees to follow along with while contributors read poems, short stories and other written works aloud. The Review is an organization whose “mission is to provide a platform for Mount Holyoke College’s diverse voices through creative writing in the form of an annually printed quality literary magazine that will be compiled by the org,” according to their website. The organization works on each publication throughout the year before hosting an end-of-year launch party celebration. The event started with intro-
ductions from the Review’s edi- member, said. tors-in-chief, Kylie Gellatly FP ’23 The Review was founded at the and Ella White ’22, before the floor beginning of the spring of 2020, with opened for writers to perform their their first publication cycle interwork aloud. From 7 p.m. to 9 p.m., rupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. contributors to the publication were After publishing two online-only called up by name to present their editions throughout the 2020-2021 work, while atschool year, this tendees followed was the first “It was really special for along with their in-person puball the members of the org, lication launch hard copies of the Review. party. Excited especially for the seniors Following the to finally conwho have been with it from readings, some vene in person the start.” guests socialized for an end-ofwhile members year event, sevof the Review eral presenters – Sage Sanderspree ’24 congratulated thanked the one another. founders of the “I loved it. I’ve been a reader of organization and the publication’s the Review for two years now, so see- contributors. ing it be published in a physical book A virtual copy of the first two was really satisfying. It was really issues of the Mount Holyoke Respecial for all the members of the view can be found on the organizaorg, especially for the seniors who tion’s website under the Issues sechave been with it from the start,” tion, with the new third publication Sage Sanderspree ’24, an audience scheduled to upload shortly.
On Friday, April 22, the Division of Student Life announced in an email to students that the College will once again ask residential students who test positive for COVID-19 to shelter in place within their residence halls starting on April 25. The decision to reinstate the isolate in place policy comes from an upward trend in positive testing rates over the last few weeks. According to the email, this policy will affect those students who live alone or are currently rooming with a student who has tested positive for COVID-19 within the past 90 days. Students who reside within three hours of campus and have a private vehicle will be asked to isolate at home. Alex Moreno ’22 was one of the first student at Mount Holyoke who was asked to isolate in place in their residential hall upon testing positive for COVID-19 when they arrived back on campus for ResLife training during winter break prior to the start of the Spring 2022 semester. “I tested positive [for COVID-19] literally the day I got to campus,” Moreno said. “I had taken a PCR at home. Because of the delays … the PCR that was supposed to come back in 24 hours took four days.” Moreno, who works as a residential fellow, was in a Zoom training session for ResLife when they got the alert that they had tested positive. Upon receiving the alert, they immediately sent a text message to their area coordinator in ResLife asking what their next steps should be. “[My area coordinator was] like, ‘I’ll get back to you. You should call a health center.’” Moreno said. Upon calling Health Services, Moreno’s phone call was sent to a
voicemail box which relayed the message that the center was closed for several days. The voicemail then directed Moreno towards a number to call in case of an emergency. “I was like, ‘Okay, I feel like I really need to talk. COVID[-19] like, that feels kind of serious.’ So I call them and then … [the person on the emergency line was] like well this isn’t an emergency so call at a different time and then they hung up on me. Yeah, they were just so mean,” Moreno recalled. Having had yet to hear back from anyone as to what their next steps could or should be, Moreno described feeling uncertain about what to do. Eventually, Moreno received a call back from a Health Services employee during which they were presented with two options: opt into a quarantine and isolation housing space in one of the apartments on campus, or participate in the pilot launch of a new isolation program. Since Moreno’s room as a residential fellow contains a private bathroom, they were offered the chance to remain in their room. However, Moreno was given a caveat along with this option — they would be responsible for coordinating having all of their meals delivered to their door, because Dining Services employees were unable to enter residential buildings. “I chose to stay in my room just because I had also just moved back from Hampshire. I needed to unpack. I needed to be in my room. I couldn’t just leave all my stuff.” Moreno said. Moreno further explained that they were only asked to isolate in place for about three days, as Health Services was following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines in counting the date that they received the first positive PCR test result as the beginning of their five-day contagion window.
Earth Week showcases climate activists and student organizations BY ANOUSHKA KUSWAHA ’24, HELEN GLOEGE ’23, LILY BENN ’25 & ANH PHAM ’25 SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENT EDITOR | SCIENCE & ENVIRONMENT STAFF WRITERS
Content warning: This article discusses anti-Indigenous violence and gendered violence. This week, Mount Holyoke celMount Holyoke’s Earth Week began with an event held by the Miller Worley Center for the Environment which previewed the upcoming programming and highlighted student organizations who engage with climate-related work on campus. Attendees were given schedules de-
tailing the Earth Week 2022 events, as well as bingo cards filled with climate-related challenges that students could complete for the opportunity to win a prize. Various student organizations were represented at the kickoff event. The Zowie Banteah Cultural Center “promotes visibility and empowerment for Native American and communities of Indigenous people,” according to the Center’s page on the Mount Holyoke website. Their representatives presented information on the role of Indigenous people in fighting against climate change and information about the cultural center. The Animal Welfare Associa-
tion, presented on the intersection between animal welfare and environmental rights, outlining their current Jorge information campaign, which aims to educate students on proper treatment of the campus goose. For example, they emphasized that Jorge should not be picked up or fed by students. The event also detailed The Fridge Project — a new student project that aims to take electronic appliances from students at the end of the year and store them over the summer to give them to First-Generation and Low-Income Partnership students in the fall. This would prevent these items from going to a landfill by giving them to those who need them.
The Outing Club was also present, providing information on how to get involved with active nature engagement and appreciation. Later during the first day of Earth Week, the Class of 1971 Climate Change Workgroup, co-sponsored by the Miller Worley Center for the Environment and Alumnae Association, held a climate film discussion. The event spotlit four climate change documentary films: “Kiss the Ground,” a documentary on regenerative soils; “2040,” a film about contemporary technologies that could reverse the effects of climate change; “Smart as Rock,” a “discussion on carbon sequestration strategies” and “Earth Emergency,” a “PBS documentary on climate tip-
ping points and feedback loops,” according to the discussion event page. The discussion ended with a screening of the film “One Ocean,” which aims to capture the beauty of nature and the grief of the climate crisis. Olivia Aguilar, Leslie and Director of the Miller Worley Center for the Environment and Associate Professor of Environmental Studies Sarah Miller spoke about how the solution to climate change “has to do with cultural identities” and systematic change through political actions, including “voting for the right administration” to push through large-scale policies that “pressure CONTINUED ON PAGE 5
u
Senate holds Town Hall with Residential Life, discusses accessibility BY GILLIAN PETRARCA ’23 STAFF WRITER
After a land acknowledgment from the Chair of Senate Shula Mathew ’22, the April 26 senate meeting began. The meeting agenda included a Town Hall with Residential Life, E-Board updates and a presentation from the all-campus elections committee. E-Board updates included Chair of Halls EJ Jankovic ’23 sharing the results from last week’s in-senate elections. Next year’s chair of senate will be EJ Jankovic ’23, Chair of halls will be Serynn Nowlin ’25 and chair of special interests will be Oumoulakyre Mounkaila ’24. Vice President of SGA Ananya Singh ’22 announced that the student activities fee will increase by $25 next year to pay for free menstrual products in the restrooms on campus and allow the E-Board to be paid. Director of Community Standards & Housing Operations Rachel Alldis and Associate Director of Residential Life Nashalie Vasquez joined senate for a Town Hall meeting. Senators submitted questions last week with their commissions.
u
2
Photo by Artemis Chen ’25 At senate, students asked Residential Life representatives about selecting and switching rooms.
Question topics ranged from housing selection times to room changes to accessibility in the dorms. When asked if students can be provided with basic cleaning supplies for their residence halls, such as vacuum cleaners and dustpans, Alldis replied that she knows facilities provide trash bags for students. Alldis stated that in the past, the school provided each dorm with a vacuum cleaner; however, vacuum
FEATURES: Bagel Therapy performs
u
4
cleaners were often either broken or stolen. Still, she expressed that she is happy to put in that request to facilities. Next, the two were asked if ResLife and the registrar could coordinate next year so that the housing lottery and class registration are not in the same week. Alldis responded that it is hard to do both of these things before spring break because many students do not begin thinking
A&E: Drag Ball returns after two years
about their living situation until after this time. However, she will talk to the registrar moving forward. Vasquez was asked how ResLife uses the roommate preferences survey to match students with a roommate. Vasquez replied that for incoming students, she reads all of their applications and tries to match students that have similar habits. However, some students change their habits as they come to college. Vasquez reminded students that they can update their roommate profile each year when finding a new roommate. When asked what circumstances can warrant a room change, Vasquez explained that switching rooms should never be a student’s first response to a conflict with their roommate. The student should first talk to their RA or RF to try and mediate the conflict. Next, they should talk to their Area Coordinator. If going through these channels is unsuccessful, then the student can be moved. Lastly, Vasquez and Alldis were asked about accessibility in the dorms. A concern was raised about accommodations for students who live in buildings without elevators
u
7- 8
but become temporarily disabled during the school year. Vasquez responded that ResLife would work with Health Services on an individual basis to get the student temporary housing accommodations. In a follow-up question, a senator asked why there are no empty rooms on the first floor of every building in case this happens. Alldis replied that there are first-floor housing accommodations that prohibit non-accessible buildings from having empty rooms on the first floor. Vasquez and Alldis thanked everyone for inviting them to the senate meeting. The floor was then opened for a presentation by all-campus elections committee member Isabela Haskell ’23. Haskell stated that the all-campus SGA election did not reach a quorum. According to the SGA constitution, senate can approve the election or vote to allow the election to be open for one more week to reach a quorum. Senators had the opportunity to vote on this matter. Senate concluded with a statement of gratitude from the senate team and a cording ceremony for senior members, where senators sang the alma mater.
COMMUNITY: Seniors reflect on time at MHN