Conservation Across Borders

Perspective

Conservation Across Borders Research indicating that the giant sea bass is critically endangered did not consider data from Mexico, where the majority of the species lives.

Arturo Ramírez-Valdez

I

was looking at the seafloor, focused on identifying fish species as I normally did when diving off the California coast, when I suddenly sensed something large above me.

When I turned my head, I saw an enormous fish—more than 2 meters long—­ calmly investigating the air bubbling from my scuba regulator each time I exhaled. This 2016 dive marked my first encounter with a giant sea bass.

I am a marine ecologist who studies how international borders pose challenges for conservation and management efforts in aquatic environments.

Despite the absence of walls or fences in the ocean, borders can still act as stark barriers for a variety of marine activities, including research.

Giant sea bass live off the western coast of North America in both Mexican and U.S. waters. Large differences between the two countries in regulation and research efforts have led to a significant misunderstanding of giant sea bass population health, including the likely miscategorization of the species as critically endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

Science Across Borders The giant sea bass (Stereolepis gigas) is the largest coastal bony fish in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. It can grow to be up to 2.7 meters long and weigh up to 315 kilograms, and its life span can reach 76 years. It lives in coastal waters ranging from Humboldt Bay in far northern California to the southern tip of the Baja California peninsula in Mexico, including the entire Gulf of California. (In this article, I use California to refer to the U.S. state and Baja California to refer to the Mexican peninsula.)

In California, commercial fishing for giant sea bass began in the late 1880s. The fish were abundant across the entire range until the early 1970s, when a sudden reduction in yield led to the collapse of U.S. giant sea bass fisheries. In 1981 the United States banned both commercial and recreational Giant sea bass live up to their name, as is evident when one is juxtaposed with a scuba diver.

The fish were once common off the California coast, but sightings are now rare, and the species is considered critically endangered.

However, that classification did not take into account data from Mexico, where the fish remain plentiful. Information siloed on the two sides of a border may hamper research and conservation efforts for other species as well.

Jeffrey Bozanic

QUICK TAKE Giant sea bass are heavily regulated and researched in the United States, but scientific and conservation efforts rarely extend beyond the border with Mexico.

338

American Scientist, Volume 109

In Mexico, giant sea bass are largely unregulated and unstudied, but observations and data from fisheries indicate that the species remains plentiful.

Asymmetrical data and research can result in false impressions of a species’ population health and thereby hamper conservation and sustainability efforts.

© 2021 Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society. Reproduction with permission only. Contact perms@amsci.org.

fishing for giant sea bass, and in 1996 the fish was included on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species as critically endangered due to the population being “severely fragmented, leading to a continuing decline of mature individuals.”

The giant sea bass population collapse in California and its subsequent protection along with a flurry of research on the fish in the United States stand in stark contrast to activities in Mexico, where few regulations govern fishing for giant sea bass, and there is almost a complete lack of data and research on the species.

The dearth of Mexico-based scholarship about giant sea bass is compounded by the problem that research from U.S. institutions stops at the border. My colleagues and I conducted an extensive literature review and found 56 unique, peer-reviewed articles that mention giant sea bass; of those, only three include any data or information from Mexico. The IUCN based its decision to categorize giant sea bass as critically endangered on a report that included no data what­so­ever from Mexico. This lack of information about giant sea bass from Baja California and the Gulf of California is concerning, given that 73 percent of the species live in Mexican waters. This knowledge gap made me wonder whether ecologists had the wrong idea about the health of giant sea bass populations.

To our surprise, from our very first assessments we found that giant sea bass were plentiful in Mexican fish markets and fishing grounds. The local fishmongers were never out of the fish; indeed

Despite the absence of walls or fences in the ocean, borders can still act as stark barriers for a variety of marine activities, including research. when we inquired about their stock, they would ask, “How many kilos do you need?” It was clear that for fishers in Mexico, the species is still common in the sea and, therefore, in their nets. It is still possible to find big fish weighing as much as 200 kilograms, and the average catch weighs around 12 kilograms.

It was fantastic to see an abundance of these fish in markets, but I wanted to understand what led to the misconception of a dwindling giant sea bass population. To that end, I examined ai16318132899_2021-11PerspectiveF2-new.pdf

1

9/16/2021

fishery trends through history and compared current fishing levels with those of previous years. Historical and contemporary fishing records show that the Mexican commercial fleet has caught an average of 55 tons of giant sea bass per year over the past 60 years, and catch size has been relatively stable over the past 20 years, with a peak in 2015 at 112 metric tons.

According to U.S. and Mexican records, the largest yearly catch on record for giant sea bass in Mexico was 386 metric tons in 1933. Biologists consider a fish population to have collapsed when total catches, under the same effort, are less than 10 percent of the largest catches on record. So a steady trend of 55 tons per year shows that in Mexico the species has not collapsed. It is clear that giant sea bass populations have faced severe declines throughout their range, but the health of the species is not as dire as previously thought.

We also found that the apparent collapse of California’s giant sea bass fishery documented in the 1970s actually began as early as 1932. As the U.S. commercial fleet overfished giant sea bass off the California coast over the first half of the 20th century, the boats moved into Mexican waters—but they

1:28:09 PM

Different Countries, Different Science In 2017 I led an effort to document the giant sea bass population in Mexico and to look for clues that would indicate how their numbers may have changed over time. At the beginning of the project, my colleagues and I feared that the records in Mexico would confirm the precarious situation of the fish, as shown by data from the United States.

www.americanscientist.org

© 2021 Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society. Reproduction with permission only. Contact perms@amsci.org.

From Ramírez-Valdez, 2021

Giant sea bass have been spotted from Humboldt Bay, California, to Oaxaca, Mexico, but the population is concentrated along the coast of Southern California and Baja California. (The Oaxaca specimen was a fish larva; fish larvae are not commonly included when assessing species distribution because they are unlikely to survive to adulthood.)

The author and his colleagues analyzed 11,251 government, scientific, and fishing industry records from the United States and Mexico to pinpoint the species’ distribution and movement since 1880. The vast majority of giant sea bass research and regulations come from the United States, but 73 percent of the species live in Mexican waters.

2021

November–December

339

continued to count all catches as being from the United States. This practice changed in 1968 when the two governments signed the Mexico–U.S. Fisheries Agreement, limiting how much fish each country’s fleet could take from the other country’s waters.

Thus the collapse of U.S. giant sea bass fisheries in the 1970s was not due to a drastic reduction in fish numbers in the region; it was driven by changes in fishing regulations between the United States and Mexico. California’s giant sea bass populations had been depressed for decades, but the lack of fish in the United States had been hidden by the continued supply from Mexico.

Better Data, Better Management Based on my research, I believe that the giant sea bass may not qualify as a critically endangered species. My analysis of modern catch data suggests

landings (metric tons)

400

U.S. landings (Mexican waters)

commercial fishing

U.S. landings (U.S. waters) Mexican landings

300

Mexican landings (estimated)

200 100 0 1910 800

total individual fish

that the population of this iconic fish is likely much larger than biologists previously thought, especially in Mexico.

Over the 40 years since the California State Legislature banned commercial and recreational fishing of giant sea bass, the fish’s populations along the U.S. coast have begun to recover. In response, a new industry has emerged: scuba-diving excursions for tourists who want to swim with the massive fish in the wild. These types of experiences are currently far more common in the United States than in Mexico, but recreational scuba tours are beginning to take root south of the border as well. These businesses raise the nonconsumptive value of the giant sea bass, which could bolster efforts to reduce overfishing and to develop more sustainable fishery-­ management practices in Mexico.

I am leading the next assessment for the IUCN; now that we have accu-

Bibliography 1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

recreational fishing

600 400 200 0 1910

1920

1930

1940

combined recreational and commerical landings in the United States and Mexico landings (metric tons)

400 300 200 100 0 1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2020

year

Fishing records indicate that although the number of giant sea bass has decreased, the population has not reached the point of critical endangerment. California experienced a sharp drop in giant sea bass landings in the early 1930s (top), but fisheries compensated by moving into Mexican waters until 1968, when the Mexico–U.S. Fisheries Agreement was signed. When the U.S. fisheries collapsed in the 1970s, recreational fishing for giant sea bass increased, particularly in Mexican waters (middle). Combined data from U.S. and Mexican fishing records show that giant sea bass levels are not as dire as U.S. records alone suggest (bottom, dotted red line indicates threshold for collapsed fish stock). From Ramírez-Valdez, 2021.

340

mulated better data from south of the U.S.–Mexico border, we can make a more informed determination that balances responsible species management with human needs.

More accurate information about giant sea bass populations may become increasingly important as climate change continues to warm oceans. If the giant sea bass start migrating north and returning to the California coast in search of cooler waters, it will be crucial to have a sense of the total species population, both north and south of the U.S.–Mexico border. Otherwise, we will not know whether a growing number of giant sea bass in California is due to population explosion or dislocation.

I hope that our study inspires policy makers in the United States and Mexico to start a conversation about how to manage this incredible fish in a collaborative way. But I feel our work also has larger implications. It shows how asymmetry in research and data can create significant barriers to understanding the past and present status of a species such as the giant sea bass and make it harder to implement sustainable practices for the future.

American Scientist, Volume 109

Dallimer, M., and N. Strange. 2015. Why sociopolitical borders and boundaries matter in conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30:132–139. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.12.004.

Dayton, P. K., M. J. Tegner, P. B. Edwards, and K. L. Riser. 1998. Sliding baselines, ghosts, and reduced expectations in kelp forest communities. Ecological Applications 8:309–322.

Pauly, D., R. Hilborn, and T. A. Branch. 2013.

Fisheries: Does catch reflect abundance?

Nature 494:303–306.

Pondella, D. J., and L. G. Allen. 2008. The decline and recovery of four predatory fishes from the Southern California Bight. Marine Biology 154:307–313.

Ramírez-Valdez, A., et al. 2021. Asymmetry across international borders: Research, fishery and management trends, and economic value of the giant sea bass (Stereolepis gigas).

Fish and Fisheries doi:10.1111/faf.12594.

Sahagún, L. 2020. Scientists seed local seas with imperiled fish. Can giant sea bass make a comeback? Los Angeles Times (March 4).

Arturo Ramírez-Valdez is a staff researcher at the University of California, San Diego, where he received his doctorate in marine biology. He is the founder and lead scientist of the Giant Sea Bass/Mero Gigante Project, a team of early-career scientists and fishers working to improve fishery management through science-based marine conservation initiatives. This article expands on and is adapted from an article in The Conversation (www.theconversation.com). Email: garturorv@ucsd.edu

© 2021 Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society. Reproduction with permission only. Contact perms@amsci.org.