Negotiations continue
Look after yourself
From the Middle East to UTM
Talk on Russian Revolution
Men’s basketball loses game
News, page 2
Opinion, page 4
Arts, page 5
Features, page 8
Sports, page 11
Faculty requests action against Peterson The request follows Peterson’s plan to launch site that highlights classes with “neo-Marxian”content ALICIA BOATTO NEWS EDITOR Faculty members from the University of Toronto’s Women and Gender Studies Institute (WGSI) have requested a meeting with the university’s vice-provost to demand that action be taken against professor Jordan Peterson, who has stated his intent to create a website ranking university courses and instructors based on “postmodern neo-Marxian” ideologies included in course content. “We are writing to express our deep concern about a proposed website being built under the direction of Prof. Jordan Peterson for the purpose of identifying and ranking courses and professors that he advocates should be removed from the university,” read the letter, “This website, if launched, presents a serious case of harassment, fostering unsafe work and study conditions for students, faculty, and staff.” Peterson has spoken about this digital tool since summer of 2017, recently saying that he hopes to have the site ready by January.
JORDANBPETERSON.COM/PHOTO
Peterson has discussed the creation of a website in several videos since summer 2017. “In public online remarks more broadly, Prof. Peterson regularly describes women and gender studies and what he refers to as ‘racial and ethnic group studies’ as pathological,
a cancer, and in other strongly denigrating terms,” the letter also reads, “The launch of this website must be put in this context in order to fully understand it as a platform that will
generate harassment.” Peterson stated his goal to establish the website as a way of “moderating the behavior of the universities.” “It will tell you the degree to
which the description is postmodern and then you can decide for yourself whether you want to take that and become a social justice warrior, if that is what you think your education should be about, or if you should avoid that like the plague that it truly is,” Peterson stated in an interview with Julie Patreon, uploaded on July 3rd of this year, “I would like to knock enrolment in the postmodern disciplines down by 75 per cent over the next five years.” “I think that what needs to happen is that freshman and second-year university students, and students coming into university from high school, need to be educated about the postmodern cult and they need to be encouraged to not take the courses, to just drop the courses, to just stay the hell away from them,” Peterson stated in a video uploaded on July 9th. In the same video, Peterson expressed an interest in seeing enrolment in the humanities decline at an increased rate. Peterson continued on page 3
College faculty to decide on latest offer The voting results will determine if the strike will continue or if classes will resume later this month ALICIA BOATTO NEWS EDITOR WITH NOTES FROM SHARMEEN ABEDI STAFF WRITER
The College Employer Council (CEC) has requested that the Ontario Public Service Employees Union (OPSEU) partake in a vote on Tuesday November 14th to accept or reject the CEC’s latest offer. Ontario college faculty has been on strike for several weeks. If the union members unanimously vote to accept the CEC’s offer classes would resume this month. However, if the vote is rejected, the strike will go on and the province will have to intervene on the interest of students who are missing out on their education. The CEC’s latest offer includes wage increases ranging from 1.752 per cent from 2017 to the year 2020 as well as a maximum salary of $115,378 in place by October 1, 2020 and a maximum hourly rate for partial-load employees of $154.26 implemented as of October 1, 2020. The new offer also pledges to place
MARYAM RADWAN/THE MEDIUM
The fate of college classes, such as those at Sheridan College, is yet to be determined. more focus in filling more full-time positions rather than “partial-load teaching positions.” “The College will give preference to the designation of full-time positions as regular continuing teaching positions rather than sessional teach-
ing positions,” the offer reads in Article 2. One of the requests by the OPSEU was to ensure job security. “The contract offer put forward by the College Employer Council on November 6 is a bad one for facul-
ty—and the students we teach. It entrenches inequity and takes us backwards on academic freedom,” stated the OPSEU in a bulletin released on November 10th. In the same bulletin, the OPSEU bargaining team outlined why they
believe their members should vote “No” to accepting the latest offer. “This offer will decrease the percentage of full-time jobs in the colleges. Faculty are fighting for a 50:50 ratio of permanent to contract staff; the colleges’ offer fails to create a path to permanent jobs for partial-load faculty, and it denies students the better education that comes with a stable workforce,” the statement reads, “By removing the cap on teaching weeks and overtime for full-time faculty, this offer allows the employer to move work from partial-load faculty to full-timers. This will mean fewer teaching hours available for partialload faculty.” “We will Vote NO because it will make the colleges stronger, better for students, and better for the next generation. We will vote NO because we love our students, we value education, and we care,” the bulletin concludes. David Scott from the CEC and JP Hornick from the OPSEU did not respond to The Medium’s request for comment regarding negotiations. Vote continued on page 3