Jan10 14

Page 1

AUGUSTA

+

OUR #1 ISSUE O FT

recipe feature PAGE 7

H E Y EA

R! TM

HEALTH • MEDICINE • WELLNESS • HEALTH • MEDICINE • WELLNESS • HEALTH • MEDICINE • WELLNESS • HEALTH • MEDICINE • WELLNESS • HEALTH • MEDICINE • WELLNESS • HEALTH • MEDICINE • WELLNESS • HEALTH • MEDICINE • WELLNESS • HEALTH • MEDICINE • WELLNESS • HEALTH • MEDICINE • WELLNESS

AUGUSTA’S MOST SALUBRIOUS NEWSPAPER • FOUNDED IN 2006

JANUARY 10, 2014

THE

SIXTY-FOUR

REPORT

We look back at the best — and the worst — body parts of 2013

50 years ago tomorrow, on Saturday, Jan. 11, 1964, the United States Surgeon General released a landmark report directly linking smoking with disease and death.

T

his is why you read the Medical Examiner. Because we take on the epic challenges. After all, there must be a couple hundred thousand body parts. Nobody knows them all, not even doctors. But that’s of no concern to us. If something is that obscure, it wouldn’t make this list anyway. Let’s begin with the top five Most Valuable Parts, the ones we simply could not live without. May we have the envelopes, please?

The MVP Awards • #1 The Buttocks You say butt, the next guy says keister, Forest Gump says buttocks, Brits say bum, your doctor says gluteus maximus. Then there’s rump, booty, glutes, tush, fanny, derriere, bottom, patootie and last but not least, badonkadonk. No matter the name, this was, for the umpteenth straight (and hopefully final) year, our Most Valuable Part. Our sedentary lifestyles use it way too much. And this muscle group is enjoying all-new uses in twerking. To “unseat” the rear from its ironic position (at the front) is a simple proposition: get up. Be active. Don’t stand for so much sitting. Aim for a period of

activity — walking, for example — at least every other day. Oh, and go easy on the twerking. Please. • #2 The Stomach The tummy actually gave the keister quite a run for its money, but came up just short. But not for lack of trying: the latest CDC stats say that 69.2 percent of us are overweight. Of that number about half (35.9 percent) are obese. What’s the difference? Without getting too technical, obesity is when someone’s weight gets to the point where it lugs illness, disability and death along with it, or at minimum increased risk of the above. To get technical about it, obesity begins with anything that’s more than 20 percent over the ideal weight for our height. What’s ideal? A six-foot guy with a medium frame should tip the scales in the 157-170 range. A 5’6” woman: 130-144.

Which of these match theone others?

If being alive is the kind of thing you find important, you might be interested to note that about 300,000 people in the US die every year from causes linked to obesity. Many more suffer from illness and disability. The cure: less filling. Check a chart for your height and ideal weight at medical-dictionary. thefreedictionary.com/obesity

• #3 Thumbs Put your hands together for fingers, too. Call it a tie (thanks to our opposable thumbs). Where would we be without around-theclock texting? We are more in touch than ever before. That is great! Even on a beach in Maui looking at a spectacular sunset or peering over the edge of the Grand Canyon, we’re looking at a little screen, texting and checking Facebook updates. The human family is now more tightly knit than ever. Good job! Whenever we post a picture of our ham

doesn’t

I

know a man here in Augusta, an elderly man, who is a heavy smoker. He enjoys smoking which, given the drug he’s addicted to, is not particularly surprising. At this stage of his life quitting would probably be a wrenching ordeal. What I think is unusual about this man is that he views all the clinical and medical evidence against tobacco the way some people view NASA’s moon landings: as non-existent. The “evidence” is all smoke and mirrors, maybe some kind of vast left-wing conspiracy. What about that? We’ve all heard about the famous Surgeon General’s findings, still remembered after all these decades on cigarettepack warning labels. Many of us don’t know, however, the background of the report itself and the debate that preceded it. For starters, do you find it odd that a landmark report of this significance was released on a Saturday? That decision was made in part due to fears about the report’s effect on the stock market. Another surprise is that the report made the impact it did, but there was a key reason for that. More about that in a moment. No one even then would say connecting cancer and smoking was headline news. For more than a decade, respected studies had been establishing a clear link between tobacco and lung cancer. In 1952, for example, a Reader’s Digest article, “Cancer by the Carton,” caused a sharp decrease in US tobacco consumption. By 1954, the American Cancer Society was publicly warning smokers of their higher lung cancer risk. The tobacco industry fought back. “There isn’t a single shred of substantial evidence to link cigarette smoking and lung cancer directly,” said the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in 1954. In a move that would set the tone for the industry stance

Please see MVP page 3

Please see SURGEON GENERAL page 2

MAGNIFY THE

PROFESSIONAL IMAGE • Personal embroidery • Group discounts • Free delivery on group orders • On-site fitting on group orders • Customized billing • Call Mark today for a free consultation!

OF YOUR PRACTICE

(706) 364.1163 • WWW.SCRUBSOFEVANS.COM • 4431 WASHINGTON RD • NEXT TO THE EVANS DINER • M-F: 10-6; SAT: 10-4


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.