FY22

Metropolitan Sewerage District of

Buncombe County, North Carolina

Annual Comprehensive Financial Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022

Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022 PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS Board Member

Representative of

M. Jerry VeHaun, Chairman

Town of Woodfin

E. Glenn Kelly, Vice-Chairman

Town of Biltmore Forest

Jackie W. Bryson, Secretary/Treasurer

Woodfin Sanitary Water & Sewer District

Matt Ashley. Jr.

Town of Montreat

Sheila Franklin

Henderson County

William G. Lapsley

Henderson County

Esther Manheimer

City of Asheville

Chris Pelly

City of Asheville

Nathan Pennington

Buncombe County

Robert Pressley

Buncombe County

Earl Valois

Town of Weaverville

Robert C. Watts

Town of Black Mountain

Al Whitesides

Buncombe County

Gwen Wisler

City of Asheville

Legal Counsel

Engineer of Record

Roberts & Stevens, P.A.

McGill Associates, P.A.

General Manager

Director of Finance

Thomas E. Hartye, P.E.

W. Scott Powell, CLGFO

Prepared By: Financial Services Department W. Scott Powell, CLGFO, Director of Finance

Cheryl S. Rice, Accounting Manager

Jody Germaine, Budget Analyst

Table of Contents

Introduction Section

Letter of Transmittal Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financing Reporting (GFOA) Map of District Boundary Principal Officials Organizational Chart

Report of Independent Auditor Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Financial Section

Basic Financial Statements Statement of Net Position Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position Statement of Cash Flows Notes to Basic Financial Statements

1-12 13 14 15 16

17-19 21-30

31 32 33 35-70

Required Supplemental Information Local Government Employees’ Retirement System – Schedule of the District’s Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability (Asset) 71 Local Government Employees’ Retirement System – Schedule of District Contributions 72 Schedule of Changes in the Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios 73 Supplemental Financial Data Comparative Statement of Net Position Comparative Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures – Budget to Actual (Non-GAAP) Combining Schedule of Net Position, All Funds (Non-GAAP) Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position, All Funds – (Non-GAAP)

75 76 77-78 79-82 83-84

Table of Contents

Statistical Section

Compliance Section

Introduction Net Position by Component Changes in Net Position (Accrual Basis of Accounting) General Revenues by Source Expenses by Function (Non-GAAP) Sewer Charge Revenue by Customer Type Customer Accounts by Member Agency Residential Sewer Rates Principal Commercial Users Ratio of Outstanding Debt Revenue Bond Coverage Demographic & Economic Statistics Personal Income by Industry Principal Employers Staffing History (FTE’s) Operating Indicators by Division

86-87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97-98 99 100 101 102 103

Report of Independent Auditor on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in 104-105 Accordance with Government Auditing Standards

This page intentionally left blank.

Introduction

Metropolitan Sewerage District OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA

October 27, 2022

To the Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, North Carolina Board of Directors, Bondholders, and Customers

We are pleased to present the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report of the Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, North Carolina (MSD or District) for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2022.

State law requires local governments to publish within five months of the close of each fiscal year a complete set of financial statements presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America by a firm of licensed certified public accountants.

MSD’s Bond Order requires release of such audited financial statements within seven months of the close of the fiscal year. This Annual Report presents MSD’s financial statements and adds this transmittal letter and statistical data to assist the reader in analyzing our financial statements.

The report consists of management’s representations concerning the finances of the District.

Consequently, management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all the information presented in this report. To provide a reasonable basis for making these representations, MSD’s management established an internal control framework designed both to protect the District’s assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient reliable information for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits, MSD’s framework of internal controls has been designed to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. As management, we assert that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, this financial report is complete and reliable in all material respects.

Cherry Bekaert LLP, a firm of licensed certified public accountants, has audited the financial statements.

The goal of the independent audit was to provide reasonable but not absolute assurance that MSD’s financial statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2022, are free of material misstatement.

1

The independent audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

The independent auditor concluded, based upon the audit, that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an unmodified opinion that MSD’s financial statements for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2022, are fairly presented in conformity with GAAP. The report of the independent auditor is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report.

Accounting standard (GASB No. 34) requires that management provide a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This letter of transmittal is designed to complement the MD&A, which is placed immediately following the report of the independent auditors and should be read in conjunction with it.

Accounting standard (GASB No. 44) calls for revised statistical reports designed to increase assistance to the reader in assessing the financial situation and condition of the District. Readers may note some changes in report formats from prior years. In addition, new schedules for which there is no information prior to implementation of GASB No. 34 may have less than the otherwise required ten years of comparative data.

Financial trend information is presented to assist readers in understanding and assessing how a government’s financial position has changed over time. Revenue capacity information is intended to assist users in understanding and assessing the factors affecting a government’s ability to generate revenues.

Debt capacity information is designed to assist users in understanding and assessing a government’s debt burden and its ability to issue additional debt. Demographic and economic information is intended to assist users in understanding the socioeconomic environment within which a government operates and provide information that facilitates comparisons of financial statement information over time and among governments.

Operating information should provide contextual information about a government’s operations and resources to assist readers in using financial statement information to understand and assess a government’s economic condition.

2

Profile of the District

A. Overview

The District was created by the state of North Carolina in 1962 to provide a wastewater treatment plant serving the City of Asheville and surrounding communities, including Biltmore Forest, Weaverville, Black Mountain, Montreat, Woodfin, the Woodfin Sanitary Water & Sewer District, and certain other unincorporated areas of Buncombe County. Through separate contractual arrangements, the District also serves customers in the Cane Creek Water and Sewer District in northern Henderson County and in the Avery Creek Sanitary Sewer District in southern Buncombe County. The collection system has been extended over the years as a result of expansion and development, and now collects wastewater through approximately 1,140 miles of sewer line with 33,890 manholes and serves approximately 58,900 residential and commercial customers and over 20 significant industries.

The wastewater treated by the District is gathered in the collector sewer systems located primarily within the boundaries of the municipalities and other political subdivisions comprising the District and conveyed to the wastewater treatment plant through large sewer lines called interceptors that generally run parallel to the French Broad River, the Swannanoa River or one of their primary and secondary tributaries. Included in the system are remote pumping stations that pump wastewater through force mains where gravity flow is not feasible.

With the Sewer Consolidation, which was signed in 1990, the District agreed to take possession of and to operate, maintain, and repair or replace, as necessary, the various collector sewer systems, which were simultaneously deeded to MSD by these same political subdivisions. Many of the collector sewer systems were undersized, deteriorated, and inadequately maintained. Since taking over the sewer systems, the District has developed and implemented, with input from its member political subdivisions, an ongoing Capital Improvement Program (the “CIP”).

Approximately 1,353,000 linear feet of existing sewer line have been replaced since consolidation, representing over 25.8% of the entire collection system.

In addition, the District expects to replace approximately 194,000 feet of existing sewer lines over the next five years. The District also has an aggressive program in effect for systematic preventative maintenance of collector sewers. The lines are first cleaned using water under high pressure and then are videotaped. The cleaning reduces line blockages and overflows, and the videotapes enable the District to locate and repair problems in the lines. The District cleans and inspects by videotaping between 15% and 20% of its system each year.

3

The District also owns, operates, and maintains a 40 million gallon per day (MGD) wastewater treatment plant to treat raw sewage and industrial wastewater as well as a hydroelectric facility, which is used to generate power for the wastewater treatment plant, which helps defray utility costs for the operation.

Member agencies providing water service include the sewer fees on their water bills and provide customer service and collection services to the District for a negotiated fee. However, the District direct bills about 500 customers, predominantly local industries, and private residences served by wells, yet connected to the sewer system.

B. Budget The annual budget serves as the foundation for the District’s financial planning and control. The Bond Order requires that the District adopt its final budget on or before June 15 of each year after a preliminary budget hearing no more than 30 days prior to adoption. North Carolina General Statutes call for an annual balanced budget ordinance based upon expected revenues, along with a budget message, to be presented to the governing board no later than June 1. During the spring, District departmental staff work with the Board’s Finance and Personnel Committees to develop an operational budget by function (administration, system services, plant operation, etc.), and District engineers work with the Board’s Planning and Capital Improvement Plan Committees on a capital budget.

After the Board approves the budget, it is administered by Department heads who may make transfers of appropriations within a department and by the General Manager who may make transfers between departments. Budget to actual comparisons of financial data for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2022 are in the supplemental information following the notes to the financial statements.

4

Factors Affecting Financial Condition The information presented in the financial statements is perhaps best understood when it is considered from the broader perspective of the specific environment within which the District operates.

A. Local Economy The Asheville-Buncombe County area in which the District is located possesses a combination of characteristics that help protect it in the current economic climate. They consist of a re-emerging more technologically advanced industrial base, a strong tourism position, concentrated healthcare employment, manufacturing diversity, and positive population in-migration. These factors are discussed in further detail in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A).

Local economic development initiatives and various private/public programs have arisen in response to these recent developments designed to strengthen the local economy. Industrial recruitment, workforce development, urban revitalization, broadband access, and improvements to interstate highways are examples of active and pending projects. Area leaders realize the importance of cooperation and action to maintain a healthy, diverse, and sustainable economy.

While industrial usage is uniform, residential, and commercial expansion has resulted in a higher demand for MSD services, as evidenced by growth in overall revenue, and especially by facility and tap fees directly resulting from new development. The majority of new residents being District customers result from emphasis on in-fill development by local communities and large new subdivisions with developer-donated sewer infrastructure.

B. Long-Term Financial Planning In November 2008, the District’s Collection System Master Plan was completed. This plan focuses on the orderly growth of the collection system into future service areas. As the sewer system grows over time, this plan will ensure that extensions of the system are made in an orderly fashion, in accordance with the planning policies of the District’s member agencies.

In 2015, the District updated the Facility Plan for the WRF. It focused on future regulatory requirements, the viability of existing processes, long-term costs, and needed performance. This comprehensive plan recommends various options for the future of the treatment plant and will help the District continue to protect our local environment by implementing the latest technologies in a phased, cost-efficient manner. The short-term and mid-term projects are scheduled within the 10-year CIP. 5

Using these plans as guides, District engineers developed a ten-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which is updated annually. The capital budgeting process begins with considering projects identified in these plans, as well as those recommended by various departments to deal with recurring wastewater collection and treatment problems. Engineering staff prioritize such projects, preparing cost estimates and a suggested timetable for construction.

The CIP Committee, consisting of representatives from the District’s member agencies, meets to review the program and to make recommendations to the Board concerning the CIP’s adoption as part of the annual budget.

The CIP continues to have the largest impact on the District’s current and future financial position.

In connection with the long-term CIP, the District prepares a ten-year cash flow projection, which integrates revenue and expenditure projections with planned capital expenditures to anticipate rate increases and timing of debt issuance.

Major Initiatives and Accomplishments

A. Collection System & Plant Rehabilitation The District maintains an aggressive, proactive rehabilitation program for both the regional 1,140mile collection system and the treatment plant facility. MSD assumed ownership and maintenance of the local public collection systems in 1991 and since that time over $475.8 million has been re-invested back into the system.

 Plant High-Rate Primary Treatment Project This is the second critical project recommended by the Plant Facilities Plan. This $17.1 million project will provide chemically enhanced primary treatment after the headworks and prior to the plant’s biological process. This new process is expected to improve the plant’s biological process and in turn, plant effluent quality. Construction is complete and the process is currently in the startup phase.

6

 Carrier Bridge Pump Station Replacement This $42.5 million project is for the replacement of the Carrier Bridge Pump Station. Carrier Bridge is the District’s largest pump station and serves significant areas of Buncombe and northern Henderson Counties. Its current capacity is 22 MGD and will be expanded to 36 MGD with the ability to be further expanded in the future. Design is currently underway, with construction expected to begin by Spring 2024.

 Equipment Storage Building On November 10, 2020 a fire destroyed MSD’s Alkaline Stabilization Building, also known as the “Nutri-Lime Building”, which is located

on

the

main

plant

property. The Nutri-Lime process was decommissioned in the early 1990s and the facility had been utilized for equipment storage ever since.

This project is to

design and construct a new storage facility at the same location.

The new building is

scheduled

for

completion

Spring 2023.

7

in

 Springside Road @ Overlook Road Sewer Rehabilitation Project The Springside Road @ Overlook Road rehabilitation project was located in South Asheville on the campus of T.C. Roberson High School. The existing 6-inch clay lines were in poor condition and had a history of SSOs.

Approximately

3,922LF of new 8-inch DIP was installed.

Buncombe

County

Schools partnered with MSD and utilized the same contractor to install sanitary sewer lines (for MSD) and new stormwater infrastructure on T.C. Roberson’s campus.

 Mountainbrook Road @

Chunns Cover Sewer Rehabilitation Project Another rehabilitation project completed this past year was the “Mountainbrook Road @ Chunns Cove Road” sewer rehabilitation in East Asheville. This project relocated existing sewer lines from the rear of the parcels (where access and maintenance was extremely difficult) to the public street rights of way.

This project also

eliminated one high aerial creek crossing where existing support piers were failing due to erosion.

The

subject lines had a history of SSOs and the project replaced approximately 3,204LF of sewer lines.

8

 West Crabapple Lane Sewer Rehabilitation Project This project was located in West Asheville on a private road, West Crabapple Lane. The existing 8-inch clay pipe was in poor condition and approximately 1,774LF of new 8-inch DIP was installed to replace the aging infrastructure.

MSD’s

System

Services crews had reported multiple structural defects in the pipe which resulted in major infiltration and inflow.

Significant Reduction of Sanitary Sewer Overflows Reduction of Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO’s) is one of the District’s primary goals related to the collection system. This has been accomplished by aggressive rehabilitation and preventative maintenance (line cleaning) programs. Over the past twelve years, the District has realized a significant reduction of SSO’s – from 289 in FY2000 to 26 in FY2022.

National Environmental Achievement Award In February 2017, MSD received a National Environmental Achievement Award from NACWA for its Incinerator System Emissions Upgrades Project. This award recognizes individuals and NACWA member agencies that have outstanding contributions to environmental protection and the clean water community. This $7.4 million project reduced emissions from the incinerator, and utilized a new mercury removal technology, which saved MSD ratepayers $5 million over traditional technology.

9

Peak Performance Award Recognition The District was recognized once again for outstanding wastewater treatment efforts by the National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) and received the prestigious NACWA Gold Award signifying consistent NPDES permit compliance during the 2019 calendar year. This marks the nineteenth year the District has been honored with a “Peak Performance Award” representing continued excellence in environmental protection.

Excellence in Management Recognition Award National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACWA) established the Excellence in Management (EIM) Recognition Program to recognize public clean water utilities that implement progressive management initiatives and thereby advance the goals of the Clean Water Act. NACWA is committed to clean water and a healthy environment and strives to help ensure that member agencies have the tools they need to meet these objectives. In 2015, the District received gold recognition.

Improved Customer Service Response The Systems Services Department reclassified a management position to that of a first responder to handle emergency calls between 2:00 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. as well as holidays, which reduced average response time from 90 minutes in FY2006 to 34 minutes in FY2022.

Environmental Regulations Compliance The District received favorable regulatory reports from the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) for wastewater discharge, pretreatment, collections system, and air quality permits. In addition, the District maintained ISO 14001 Environmental compliance certification.

Another requirement of the annual Collection Systems permit is to perform preventative maintenance on at least 600,000 linear feet of sewer line. During the current year, the District cleaned approximately 845,000 linear feet.

10

Continuing Disclosure Obligation The District issued revenue bonds most recently in May 2018. In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Commission Rule 15C-12, as amended, and the North Carolina Local Government Commission, the District will provide continuing disclosure information to recognized municipal security information repositories. This will include the audited financial statements, historical net revenues and debt coverage, future rate increases and listing of the District’s largest commercial and industrial customers.

Financial Awards The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, North Carolina for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2021. This was the twenty-seventh consecutive year that the District has achieved this prestigious award. In order to receive a Certificate of Achievement award, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements.

A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current Comprehensive Annual Financial Report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.

In addition, the District also received the GFOA’s Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for its annual FY2022 budget document. In order to qualify for the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award, the District’s budget document was judged proficient in several categories, including as a policy document, a financial plan, an operations guide, and a communications device. This is the twenty-fourth consecutive year that the District has achieved this prestigious award.

11

Acknowledgments The preparation of this report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of staff throughout the District and the District’s independent auditor, Cherry Bekaert LLP. We would like to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of Cheryl Rice, the District’s Accounting Manager. In addition, a special thanks to Jody Germaine who assembled the Annual Report documents and prepared the graphs, and to Asheville Chamber of Commerce for the current economic data and insightful identification of business trends.

We also would like to thank the members of the Finance Committee and Board for their support of maintaining high standards of fiscal accountability and responsibility for the District.

Respectfully Submitted,

Thomas E. Hartye, P.E. General Manager

W. Scott Powell, CLGFO Director of Finance

12

Certificate of Achievement

13

Map of District Boundary

14

Principal Officials

Board Members

Representative of

Matt Ashley, Jr.

Town of Montreat

Jackie W. Bryson, Secretary/Treasurer

Woodfin Sanitary Water & Sewer District

Douglas Dearth

Town of Weaverville

Sheila Franklin

Henderson County

E. Glenn Kelly

Town of Biltmore Forest

William G. Lapsley

Henderson County

Esther Manheimer

City of Asheville

Chris Pelly

City of Asheville

Nathan Pennington

Buncombe County

Robert Pressley

Buncombe County

M. Jerry VeHaun, Chairman

Town of Woodfin

Robert C. Watts

Town of Black Mountain

Al Whitesides

Buncombe County

Gwen Wisler

City of Asheville

Legal Counsel Roberts & Stevens, P.A.

Engineer of Record McGill Associates, P.A.

General Manager Thomas E. Hartye, P.E.

Director of Finance W. Scott Powell, CLGFO

15

Organizational Chart MSD Board Committees CIP Finance Personnel Planning Right of Way

Legal Counsel

General Manager Thomas E. Hartye, P.E.

Engineer of Record

Executive Secretary Pam Nolan

Engineering Director Hunter Carson, P.E. Project Management Design/Drafting Capital Projects

Financial Services

Information Technology

System Services Construction

Director Director Director Director W. Scott Powell, Pam Thomas Matthew Walter Mike Stamey, P.E. CLGFO Accounting Budget Cash Flow Mgmt.

Right-of-Way

Facilities Maintenance

Allocations

Finance

Taps

Financial Forecasting

Sewer Expansion

Human Resources

Employee Relations

Information Technology

Construction Administration

Payroll

Management Information Systems

Construction (in-house)

Employee Benefits Environmental Health & Safety

Geographical Information Systems

Emergency Maintenance

System Services Maintenance

Waste Treatment

Director Ken Stines

Director Roger Edwards

Electrical

Operations

Mechanical

Industrial Waste

Preventative Maintenance

Reclamation Services

Technical Services Pump Station Maintenance

Fleet Maintenance Investments Purchasing Warehouse

# of employees = 15

# of employees = 17

# of employees =7

# of employees = 10

# of employees = 34

# of employees = 49

# of employees = 19

Number of Employees: 152

16

Financial Section

17

18

19

This page intentionally left blank.

20

Management’s Discussion and Analysis As management of the Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County (District), we offer readers of the District’s financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the District’s financial activities for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2022.

Financial Highlights A. Net Position Net Position is defined as the value of all assets, plus deferred outflows of resources, less all liabilities and deferred inflows of resources. Restricted net position is restricted by law, bond covenant, or other contractual arrangement, less debt incurred. The financial well-being of a government is reflected to a large degree by the growth of net position.  The District’s net position totals $494.1 million and reflects a $20.4 million or 4.3% increase from the prior year. The income and expense items affecting this improvement will be discussed in greater detail in the section, “Financial Analysis of the District” on page 3.  The $20.4 million increase is attributable to the District’s normal operations and includes contributed capital assets from developers of $3.3 million  Net investment in capital assets increased by $13.3 million or 3.3%, evidencing the District’s continued rehabilitation of infrastructure as well as an increase in donated capital.

B. Outstanding Debt After principal repayments of $6.1 million, the District has approximately $88.4 million of outstanding debt exclusive of related unamortized discounts and premiums.

Overview of the Financial Statements This Discussion and Analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the District’s basic financial statements. The District’s basic financial statements are comprised of two components: the financial statements and notes to the financial statements that explain in more detail some of the information in the financial statements.

21

After the notes, supplemental information is provided to show details about the District’s fund structure as set forth in the Bond Order. Budgetary information required by the North Carolina General Statutes also can be found in this part of the statements.

A. Basic Financial Statements The financial statements of the District report information about the District using accounting methods similar to those used by private-sector companies. There are three required statements, which provide both long-term and short-term information about the District’s overall financial status.  The Statement of Net Position presents information on all the District’s assets, plus deferred outflows of resources, less liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources with the difference reported as net position. This Statement provides information about the types and amounts of resources (assets), deferred outflows of resources, the obligations to the District’s employees and creditors (liabilities), and deferred inflows of resources, which may be used to measure the financial health of the District by providing the basis for evaluating the capital structure of the District and assessing liquidity and financial flexibility.  The Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position presents the current year’s results of operations and can be used to determine how successful the District has been in collecting revenues, controlling expenses, and recovering costs through user fees and charges.  The final required financial statement is the Statement of Cash Flows. This Statement reports cash receipts, cash payments, and net changes in cash resulting from operating, investing, and capital and related financing activities, and may be used to determine how cash originated, what that cash was used for, and how these activities resulted in the change to cash balance during the year.

These financial statements should be evaluated with other external factors such as economic conditions, regional employment statistics, and population growth for a more complete analysis of the District’s current and future financial condition.

22

Financial Analysis of the District A. Net Position

As previously noted, net position may serve over time as one useful indicator of an entity’s financial condition. The District’s assets plus deferred outflows of resources exceeded liabilities and deferred inflows by $494.1 million at June 30, 2022.

The largest proportion of the District’s net position, approximately 83.6%, reflects the District’s net investment in capital assets (e.g., land, buildings, interceptor and collector sewer lines, treatment facilities, equipment, etc.), less any related debt outstanding that was issued to acquire these items. As these assets are required to provide wastewater collection and treatment services, these resources are not available for future spending. Although the District’s investment in its capital assets is reported net of the outstanding related debt, the resources needed to repay that debt must be provided by other sources as the capital assets cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities.

An additional $7.3 million or 1.5% of the District’s net position are funds restricted by the Bond Order to be held in reserve for either debt service or for emergency capital equipment repair or replacement. The remaining balance of $73.8 million is unrestricted and may be used to fund payas-you-go capital projects, medical or workers’ compensation claims, replacement reserves, or any other legal purpose.

The District’s overall financial position improved during the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2022 as overall net position grew by 4.3%. The District’s financial strategy is to set rates at a level sufficient to cover operating and debt service expenses as well as to provide about half of the funding for pay-as-you-go infrastructure rehabilitation. The success of this approach is visible in the continuing growth of the District’s net position. Current assets will decrease gradually as cash and investments are used to rehabilitate infrastructure, until the next planned revenue bond issuance.

23

Table 1—Condensed Statement of Net Position

FY 2022 Current and Other Assets

$

93,230,537 $

FY 2021

% Increase (Decrease) 2022 Vs. 2021

85,322,943

9.27%

Capital Assets, net

503,311,630

496,582,900

1.36%

Total Assets

596,542,167

581,905,843

2.52%

5,805,300

7,674,781

(24.36%)

Long-Term Liabilities Outstanding

92,696,512

103,934,604

(10.81%)

Other Liabilities

12,849,524

11,636,880

10.42%

105,546,036

115,571,484

(8.67%)

2,735,434

262,801

940.88%

412,955,363

399,621,901

3.33%

Debt Service

6,259,891

5,990,231

4.50%

Bond Covenant

1,028,381

1,026,733

17.69%

73,822,362

67,107,474

10.01%

473,746,339

4.29%

Deferred Outflows of Resources

Total Liabilities Deferred Inflows of Resources Net Position: Net Investment in Capital Assets Restricted for:

Unrestricted Total Net Position

$

494,065,997 $

The Condensed Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position shown in Table 2 below provides information concerning what contributed to the net changes reported in Table 1.

24

Table 2—Condensed Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position

FY 2022 Operating Revenues: Sewer Charges Facility and Tap Fees Miscellaneous Total Operating Revenues

FY 2021

$ 41,484,740 $ 38,591,901 5,966,012 5,092,060 660,754 1,770,022 48,111,506 45,453,983

% Increase (Decrease) 2021 Vs. 2020 7.50% 17.16% (62.67%) 5.85%

Operating Expenses: Salaries and Employee Benefits Contractual Services Utilities Repairs and Maintenance Other Supplies and Expenses Insurance Claims and Expenses Depreciation Total Operating Expenses Operating Income

8,427,033 1,798,794 1,446,493 1,026,018 1,325,837 2,332,926 12,339,044 28,696,145 19,415,361

8,640,936 1,810,481 1,105,110 998,183 1,623,222 2,351,485 12,394,875 28,924,292 16,529,691

(2.48%) (0.65%) 30.89% 2.79% (18.32%) (0.79%) (0.45%) (0.79%) 17.46%

Non-operating Revenues (Expenses): Investment Income Interest Expense Gain (Loss) on Sale of Surplus Property Total Non-operating Revenues (Expenses)

87,001 (2,949,509) 418,696 (2,443,812)

30,582 (3,110,487) 322,770 (2,757,135)

184.48% (5.18%) 29.72% (11.36%)

16,971,549 3,348,109

13,772,656 7,558,647

23.23% (55.70%)

20,319,658

19,936,419 41,267,622

(100.00%) (50.76%)

473,746,339

432,478,717

9.54%

$ 494,065,997

$ 473,746,339

4.29%

Income before other transactions Capital Contribution Special Item - Cane Creek Water and Sewer District asset contribution from Henderson County Change in Net Position Total Net Position, beginning of year Total Net Position, end of year

25

This section discusses significant factors contributing to the District’s 4.3% increase in net position from $473.7 million to $494.1 million.

A. Operating Revenues  Sewer revenues increased 7.5%. The District raised domestic sewer rates by 2.75% at the beginning of the Fiscal Year 2022. The additional increase was due to better than anticipated revenue as a result to increased usage over the previous year.

 Facility and Tap Fees increased 17.2% over the previous year reflecting a rebound in development in the area.

B. Operating Expenses were kept fairly flat with the exception of: 

Salaries and Employee Benefits—The District experienced a 2.48% decrease in current year

expense due to general retirements in the current year.



Utilities Expense—A decrease in internally generated hydroelectric power as well as

increasing cost of fuel and natural gas attributed to the 30.9% increase in current year expenses.

C. Investment Income—Increasing short-term interest rates resulted in a 184.5% increase in the District’s interest income.

D. Interest Expense—Interest expense decreased due to the reduction of outstanding debt.

E. Capital Contribution—The amounts reported as capital contributions represent the estimated fair market value of donated sewer collector lines by developers and member agencies.

The District has no direct control over the amount of contributions received. These amounts are reflected as equal income and capital expenditures in the financial statement.

26

Capital Asset and Debt Administration A. Capital Assets The District owns capital assets with a historical cost of $725,180,779. These assets consist of land (including easements), improvements including a hydroelectric dam, buildings, collector sewer lines, interceptor lines (large pipelines into which collector sewer lines feed), construction equipment and machinery, service vehicles, office machines, computer hardware and software.

The District has begun several projects expected to cost $176.4 million to complete and at June 30, 2022 was committed to contracts expected to cost $10.7 million.

Major capital asset transactions during the year include:  Rehabilitation of over 27,183 feet of sewer line including:  Mountain Brook Road @ Chunns Cove Road  West Crabapple Lane  Jarnaul Avenues  Christian Creek Interceptor  Plant High-Rate Primary Treatment  Bryson Street

Table 3—Capital Assets FY 2022 Land Easements Improvements Other than Buildings Buildings Machinery and Equipment Interceptor Sewer Lines Collector Sewer Lines Construction in Progress Subtotal

$

Less: Accumulated Depreciation Net Property, Plant and Equipment

FY 2021

2,773,980 $ 11,435,322 8,520,054 49,064,646 85,131,956 126,480,246 414,625,022 27,149.553 725,180,779 (221,869,149)

$

503,311,630

2,773,980 11,117,028 7,431,575 49,092,193 85,439,600 126,477,532 404,428,663 20,770,543 707,531,114 (210,948,214)

$

496,582,900

27

More detailed information on the District’s capital assets is presented in Note 5 to the financial statements.

B. Debt Administration At June 30, 2022, the District had $88,373,590 in par value of outstanding debt. Unlike cities and counties, the District does not have a debt limit. However, the District’s Bond Order requires that user rates be set to achieve a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.2 annually. This means that in any year, after the District pays all current operating expenses, the net revenues remaining must be at least 120% of that year’s principal and interest payments.

The District holds an AA+ rating from Standard & Poor’s, an Aaa rating from Moody’s Investor Service, and an AAA rating from Fitch. These high ratings allow the District to pay a lower rate of interest than other entities with less favorable ratings.

Further details on long-term debt are provided in Note 3 to the financial statements.

Economic Factors and Next Year’s Budget and Rates The District, located in Buncombe County within the Asheville metropolitan area, has been in a better economic position than many other communities in the state and the nation due to several key factors.

A. Unemployment—From 2003 through 2021, Asheville’s unemployment rate has been among the lowest compared to the other ten metropolitan areas in North Carolina. As of June 2022, Asheville’s unemployment rate was 3.4%. This is below the state and national averages of 4.1% and 3.8%, respectively. Over the past year, about 8,000 jobs have been added to the economy, increasing current employment to 200,100.

B. Balanced Economic Growth—The Asheville metropolitan area has developed a unique and balanced economy based on several key drivers. Actions of each driver can overlap and support other drivers in the local economy. History has also shown that a period of weakness for one driver can lead to the expansion of another.

Key drivers include:  Specialized health care industry  Restructured manufacturing sector 28

 Baby-boom generation fueled population growth  Growing professional services sector  Stable tourism activity  Resilient housing market  Local Healthcare Employment—At over 36,700 workers, health services is now the largest industry sector in the Asheville metropolitan area. Ambulatory health services is the chief source of the new jobs. Strong gains in well-paying health services have softened the earlier losses in the traditional manufacturing sector. Historically, stable growth in local healthcare services has had an average annual rate of 2% to 4%. Healthcare has had a 2.8% increase in employment over the previous year.  Manufacturing Employment—With 22,600 workers, manufacturing continues to be transformed into a high-skilled sector restructured around an advanced group of machinery, plastics, and electronics manufacturers. Recent economic indicators suggest job gain in manufacturing despite the impact by the COVID-19 Pandemic. Manufacturing did experience a 3.2% increase over the previous year.  Continued Moderate Population Growth—Population growth remains a consistent and stable contributor to the local economy. Estimates indicate moderate growth patterns will continue between 1.5% and 2.0% per year. More than 95% of local population growth is from in-migration, with the remaining from births over deaths.  Professional and Business Sector—The confluence of retiring baby-boomers, local quality of life, and economic growth has resulted in the emergence of a growing professional and business services sector. This sector includes many highly technical and well-paid services such as engineering, computer design, and temporary employment services. Recent economic indicators suggest job gain in the professional and business sector despite the impact by the COVID-19 Pandemic. The professional and business sector did experience a 12.9% increase over the previous year The major economic challenge facing the District is the continued impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on employment and tourism. However, the impacts should be temporary and tempered by the District’s more than adequate cash position.

29

Based on the District’s projections for residential, commercial, and industrial sewer use, sewer rates will increase by 3.0% for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2023. Current projections indicate adequate funding for operations, debt service, and the District’s long-term Capital Improvement Program.

Requests for Additional Information This report is designed to provide an overview of the District’s finances for those with an interest in this area. Questions concerning any of the information found in this report or requests for additional information should be directed to W. Scott Powell, Director of Finance, Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, 2028 Riverside Drive, Asheville, NC 28804, (828) 225-8211, or spowell@msdbc.org.

30

Statement of Net Position June 30, 2022 MSD Statement of Net Position June 30, 2022 Assets: Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Investments Restricted cash and cash equivalents Receivables (net): Accounts Sales Employee Interest Inventories Prepaid expenses Total current assets

$

43,942,852 32,666,087 7,657,635 6,967,419 431,438 9,210 29,279 495,586 2,650 92,202,156

Noncurrent assets: Restricted cash and cash equivalents

1,028,381

Capital assets: Land Easements Plant and equipment Construction in progress Less: accumulated depreciation Total property and equipment

2,773,980 11,435,322 683,821,924 27,149,553 (221,869,149) 503,311,630

Total noncurrent assets

504,340,011

Total assets

596,542,167

Deferred outflows of resources:

5,805,300

Liabilities: Current liabilities: Payments from current assets: Accounts payable and accrued expenses Current portion of compensated absences payable Payments from restricted cash and cash equivalents: Bond interest payable Current portion of long term obligations Total current liabilities

1,397,744 6,360,825 12,849,524

Noncurrent liabilities: Compensated absences, net of current portion Total other post-employment benefits Total pension liability Derivative liability Long-term obligations, net of current maturities Total noncurrent liabilities

823,174 4,049,000 1,803,202 809,389 85,211,747 92,696,512

5,030,955 60,000

Total liabilities

105,546,036

Deferred inflows of resources:

2,735,434

Net position: Net investment in capital assets Restricted for: Debt service Bond covenant Unrestricted Total net position

412,955,363 6,259,891 1,028,381 73,822,362 $

494,065,997

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

31

Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 Operating revenues: Sewer charges Facility and tap fees Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and employee benefits Contractual services Utilities Repairs and maintenance Other supplies and expenses Insurance claims and expenses Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income

$

8,427,033 1,798,794 1,446,493 1,026,018 1,325,837 2,332,926 12,339,044 28,696,145 19,415,361

Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income Interest expense Gain on disposal of surplus property Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) Income before contributions

87,001 (2,949,509) 418,696 (2,443,812) 16,971,549

Capital contribution Change in net position

3,348,109 20,319,658

Total net position, beginning of year Total net position, end of year

41,484,740 5,966,012 660,754 48,111,506

473,746,339 $

494,065,997

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

32

Statement of Cash Flows For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 Cash flows from operating activities: Cash received from customers Sales tax paid Cash paid to employees for services Cash paid for goods and services Other operating revenue Net cash provided by operating activities

$

Cash flows from capital and related financing activities Acquisition and construction of capital assets Proceeds from sale of surplus property Principal paid on bond maturities Interest paid on bond maturities Net cash used in capital and related financing activities

(14,343,274) 439,435 (6,120,825) (3,527,874) (23,552,538)

Cash flows from investing activities: Proceeds from sale of investments Purchases of investments Income on investments Net cash used in investing activities

178,306,530 (197,018,837) 100,571 (18,611,736)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, July 1 Cash and cash equivalents, June 30

47,318,435 36,374 (6,529,427) (10,247,654) 671,024 31,248,752

(10,915,522) $

63,544,390 52,628,868

Operating income Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation Changes in assets and liabilities: (Increase) in receivables (Increase) in inventory (Increase) in prepaid items (Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses Increase in other post-employment benefits (Decrease) in accrued compensated absences (Increase) in deferred outflows of resources - pensions (Increase) in deferred outflows of resources - other post-employment benefits (Decrease) in net pension liability (Decrease) in deferred inflows of resources - other post-employment benefits Increase in deferred inflows of resources - pensions Total adjustments

$

19,415,361

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

Reconciliation of operating income to net cash provided by operating activities:

12,339,044 (85,672) (38,558) (150) (330,026) 375,000 (4,118) (411,920) (112,640) (2,370,202) (98,000) 2,570,633 11,833,391 31,248,752

Noncash investing, capital, and financing activities: 1. At various times during the year ended June 30, 2022 the District received contribution of sewer lines constructed by developers with a reported estimated fair value of $3,348,109.

2. During the year ended June 30, 2022, a total of $42,849 of unrealized loss decreased the fair value of investments not considered to be cash equivalents.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

33

This page intentionally left blank.

34

Notes to Basic Financial Statements June 30, 2022 Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The accounting policies of the Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, North Carolina (District) conform to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to enterprise-type governments. The following is a summary of the more significant accounting policies:

A. Reporting Entity The District is a public body and body politic and corporate of the State of North Carolina, created pursuant to the North Carolina Metropolitan Sewerage Districts Act (Article 5, Chapter 162A of the General Statutes of North Carolina, as amended). The District was established in 1962 by the North Carolina State Stream Sanitation Committee for the purpose of constructing and operating facilities for sewage treatment within the political subdivisions serviced by the District as listed below.

City of Asheville

Town of Montreat

Beaverdam Water and Sewer District

Enka-Candler Water and Sewer District

Town of Biltmore Forest

Fairview Sanitary Sewer District

Town of Black Mountain

Skyland Sanitary Sewer District

Busbee Sanitary Sewer District

Swannanoa Water and Sewer District

Caney Valley Sanitary Sewer District

Town of Weaverville

Crescent Hill Sanitary Sewer District

Venable Sanitary District

Woodfin Sanitary Water and Sewer District On July 1, 2020, the District, pursuant to N.C. General Statute, §162A-68.5, acquired the Cane Creek Water and Sewer District in northern Henderson County. As required by G.S. 162A-68.5, two new members representing Henderson County were added to the Board.

Under the North Carolina Metropolitan Sewerage Districts Act, the District is authorized, among other things, to: (a) acquire, construct, improve, extend, maintain, and operate any sewerage system or part thereof (including facilities for the generation and transmission of electric power and energy) within or without the District; (b) to issue revenue bonds to pay the costs of any of the foregoing; and (c) to set and collect rents, rates, fees, and other charges for provision of sewerage services and the use of any District facilities.

35

The District Board consists of fourteen members appointed as follows: three from the County of Buncombe, three from the City of Asheville, two from the County of Henderson and one each from Woodfin Sanitary Water & Sewer District, and the Towns of Biltmore Forest, Black Mountain, Montreat, Woodfin, and Weaverville.

The District owns, operates, and maintains a Wastewater Treatment Plant as well as the related network of collector and interceptor sewers. The Treatment Plant has a capacity to treat up to 40 million gallons per day, but currently receives an average of 22.2 million gallons per day from approximately 58,000 residential and commercial customer accounts transported through approximately 1,032 miles of collector sewers.

The District’s basic financial statements include all transactions of the District for which the District is financially accountable. Financial accountability is defined as appointment of a majority of a component unit’s board and either the ability to impose the will of the District or the possibility that the component unit will provide a financial benefit to or impose a financial burden on the District. Based on these criteria, the District has determined that there are no component units, which come under the criteria for inclusion. The District is not a component unit of any other governmental entity.

B. Basis of Presentation—Fund Accounting The accounts of the District are organized and operated on the basis of funds in accordance with the District’s Bond Order. A Fund is an independent fiscal and accounting entity with a selfbalancing set of accounts comprised of assets, deferred outflows, liabilities, deferred inflows, net position, revenues, and expenditures or expenses as appropriate. Fund accounting segregates funds according to their intended purpose and is used to aid management in demonstrating compliance with finance-related legal and contractual provisions. The minimum number of funds is maintained consistent with legal and managerial requirements.

The District presents the basic financial statements as a proprietary fund basis. A proprietary fund accounts for those operations (a) that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises where the intent of the governing body is that costs (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges; or (b) where the governing body has decided that the periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and/or net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, and other purposes.

36

C. Measurement Focus and Basis of Accounting The proprietary fund is accounted for on the flow of economic resources measurement focus. With this measurement focus, all assets and deferred outflows of resources, and all liabilities and deferred inflows of resources associated with the operation of these funds are included on the balance sheet. Proprietary Funds are presented in the financial statements on the accrual basis of accounting. Under this basis, revenues are recognized in the accounting period when earned and expenses are recognized in the period they are incurred.

D. Budgetary Data Budgets are adopted as required by state statute and in compliance with the Bond Order. All annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year-end. The budget is prepared using the modified accrual basis of accounting, which is consistent with the accounting system used to record transactions during the fiscal year. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations at the functional level.

Management is authorized to transfer appropriations within a department; however, any revisions that alter total expenditures of any function must be approved by the governing board. There were no budget amendments.

As required by North Carolina State law [G.S. 159-26(d)], the District maintains encumbrance accounts, which are considered to be “budgetary accounts”. Encumbrances outstanding at yearend represent the estimated amounts of the expenditures ultimately to result if unperformed contracts in progress at year-end are completed. Encumbrances outstanding at year-end do not constitute expenditures or liabilities.

E. Deposits and Investments All deposits of the District are made in board-designated official depositories and are secured as required by State law [G.S. 159-31]. The District may designate as an official depository any bank or savings and loan association whose principal office is located in North Carolina. In addition, the Board may establish time deposit accounts such as NOW and SuperNOW accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit.

State law [G.S. 159-30(c)] authorizes the District to invest in obligations of the United States or obligations fully guaranteed both as to principal and interest by the United States; obligations of the State of North Carolina, (the “State”); bonds and notes of any North Carolina local government or public authority; obligations of certain non-guaranteed federal agencies, and certain high

37

quality issues of commercial paper and bankers’ acceptances and the North Carolina Capital Management Trust (NCCMT).

The District’s Bond Order limits investments to: a. government obligations; b. obligations of the following agencies: Federal Financing Bank, Federal Home Loan Banks,

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (except for stripped mortgage securities which are purchased at prices exceeding their principal amounts), The Federal National Mortgage Association (except for stripped mortgage securities which are purchased at prices exceeding their principal amounts), the Government National Mortgage Association, the Federal Housing Administration, and the Farmers Home Administration; c. direct general obligations of the State secured by the full faith and credit and taxing power of

the State rated in one of the two highest rating categories by Moody’s and S&P; d. bonds and notes of any North Carolina local government or public authority (other than the

District), subject to such restrictions as the Secretary of the Local Government Commission may impose, provided such bonds or notes are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by Moody’s and S&P; e. savings certificates or certificates of deposit issued by any commercial bank or savings and

loan association organized under the laws of the State or in any federal bank or savings and loan association having its principal office in the State; provided, however, that any principal amount of such certificates in excess of the amount insured by the federal government or any agency thereof; or by a mutual deposit guaranty association authorized by the Administrator of the Savings Institutions Division of the Department of Commerce of the State, be fully collateralized by obligations reserved by financial institution; f. prime quality commercial paper (having original maturities of not more than 270 days) bearing

the highest rating of Moody’s and S&P and not bearing a rating below the highest by any nationally recognized rating service which rates the particular obligation; g. participating shares in the government portfolio of North Carolina Capital Management Trust,

provided that the investments of such fund are limited to those qualifying for investment under this definition and that said fund is certified by the Local Government Commission;

38

h. a commingled investment pool established and administered by the State Treasurer pursuant

to G. S. 147-69.3; i.

repurchase agreements with respect to Government Obligations if entered into with certain restrictions;

j.

any other investment now or hereafter permitted for investment of funds by the District by the General Statutes of North Carolina, including, without limitation, Section 159-30 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.

The District’s investments with a maturity of more than one year at acquisition and non-money market investments are reported at fair value as determined by quoted market prices. The NCCMT Government Portfolio invest in treasuries and government agencies, is a money market fund (2a7), and maintains an AAAm rating from S&P and AAA-mf by Moody’s Investor Service. It is reported at fair value.

F. Restricted Assets and Liabilities Any unexpended bond proceeds from the revenue bonds issued by the District are classified as restricted assets because their use is completely restricted to the purpose for which the bonds were originally issued. Cash and investments included in the District’s bond service and debt service reserve accounts are classified as restricted because their use is completely restricted for reserves and debt service of the outstanding bonds. The District first applies restricted resources when an expense is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted net position is available.

Any amounts payable from restricted assets are considered restricted liabilities. At June 30, 2022, the bond interest payable of $1,397,444 and the current portion of long-term debt of $6,360,825 represent total restricted liabilities of the District.

G. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts All receivables that historically experience uncollectible accounts are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. This amount is estimated based on the percentage of receivables that were written off in prior years. The allowance was $2,668,111 as of June 30, 2022.

39

H. Inventories Inventories consist of materials and supplies held for consumption and expensed as used.

Inventories are valued at cost (first-in, first-out) which approximates market.

I. Capital Assets Capital assets, primarily property and equipment, are recorded at original cost at acquisition or construction. Donated capital assets are recorded at acquisition value. Assets costing at least $15,000 and with a useful life of over one year are capitalized. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset lives are not capitalized.

Depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis. Assets are depreciated based on useful life estimated by District engineers as follows. See Note 5 for further details.

Buildings/Waste Treatment Plants Improvements other than Buildings Waste Treatment/Pumping Stations Machinery Interceptor Sewer Lines Collector Sewer Lines Office Furniture/Fixtures

50 years 10-50 years 10-15 years 50-100 years 50-100 10years years

Lab Equipment Maintenance Equipment Automobiles/Trucks Communication Equipment Computer Equipment/Software

5-10 years 5-10 years 5-10 years 5-10 years 3-5 years

J. Deferred Outflows of Resources/Inflows of Resources In addition to assets, the Statement of Net Position reports a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, Deferred Outflows of Resources, represents a consumption of net assets that applies to a future period and therefore will not be recognized as an expense until that period. The District has six items that meet this criterion - bond refunding charges, accumulated decrease in fair value of hedging derivative instruments, pension and OPEB deferrals, contributions made to the pension plan, and contributions made to the OPEB plan in the 2022 Fiscal Year.

In addition to liabilities, the Statement of Net Position will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, Deferred Inflows of Resources, represents an acquisition of net assets that applies to a future period and so will not be recognized as revenue until then. The District has two items that meets the criterion for this category - deferrals of pension and OPEB expense.

40

K. Compensated Absences The vacation policy of the District provides for the accumulation of up to forty (40) days earned vacation leave with such leave being fully vested when earned. Accordingly, an expense and a liability for compensated absences and any salary-related payments such as retirement contributions and payroll taxes are recorded. Accumulated earned vacation at June 30, 2022 is $883,174. See Note 3D for further details.

The District's sick leave policy provides for an unlimited accumulation of earned sick leave.

Accumulated sick leave at June 30, 2022 amounts to approximately $2.78 million. Sick leave does not vest but any unused sick leave accumulated at the time of retirement may be used in the determination of length of service for retirement benefit purposes. Since the District has no obligation for the accumulated sick leave until it is actually taken, no accrual for sick leave has been made.

L. Cash Equivalents For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flow, the District considers all highly liquid investments (including restricted assets) with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

M. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

N. Operating and Non-operating Revenues and Expenses The District defines operating revenues and expenses as those directly received and incurred in the process of providing wastewater collection and treatment. Nonoperating revenues and expenses are those resulting from incidental functions such as investment income, interest expense on long-term debt, and sale of surplus equipment.

41

O. Pensions and OPEB For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows of resources, deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System (LGERS), and additions to/deductions from LGERS’ fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by LGERS. For this purpose, plan member contributions are recognized in the period in which the contributions are due. The District’s employer contributions are recognized when due and the District has a legal requirement to provide the contributions. Benefits and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the terms of LGERS. Investments are reported at fair value.

The District participates in one other postemployment benefit plan (OPEB), for health insurance (The Plan). The District currently finances the Plan following a pay-as-you-go approach, paying an amount each year equal to premiums related to the coverage. For purposes of measuring the total OPEB liability, deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to OPEB, and the OPEB expense have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by the Plan. For this purpose, the Plan recognizes benefit payments when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms.

Note 2—Deposits and Investments A reconciliation of the District’s deposits and investments for disclosure purposes and cash, cash equivalents, and investments for financial statement presentation as of June 30, 2022 is included below: Cash on hand

$

Deposits

1,804,337

Investments Total Presentation on Statement of Net Position Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents Investments

350 83,490,268

$

85,294,955

$

43,942,852 32,666,087

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

7,657,635

Noncurrent Assets Restricted cash and cash equivalents Total

1,028,381 85,294,955

$

42

A. Deposits All of the District’s deposits are either insured or collateralized by using the Pooling Method. Under the Pooling Method, which is a collateral pool, all uninsured deposits are collateralized with securities held by the State Treasurer’s agent in the name of the State Treasurer. Since the State Treasurer is acting in a fiduciary capacity for the District, these deposits are considered to be held by the District’s agent in the District’s name.

The amount of the pledged collateral is based on an approved averaging method for non-interestbearing deposits and the actual current balance for interest-bearing deposits. Depositories using the Pooling Method report to the State Treasurer the adequacy of their pooled collateral covering uninsured deposits. The State Treasurer does not confirm this information with the District or the escrow agent.

Because of the inability to measure the exact amount of collateral pledged for the District under the Pooling Method, the potential exists for under collateralization, and this risk may increase in periods of high cash flows.

However, the State Treasurer enforces strict standards of financial stability for each depository that collateralizes public deposits under the Pooling Method and the District relies on the State Treasurer to monitor those financial institutions. The District’s formally adopted investment policy attempts to mitigate custodial credit risk for deposits by pre-qualifying the financial institutions receiving funds. The District also complies with the provisions of G.S. 159-31 when designating official depositories and verifying that deposits are properly secured.

At June 30, 2022, the District’s deposits had a carrying amount of $1,804,337 and a bank balance of $2,025,321 Of the bank balance, $296,697 was covered by federal depository insurance and $1,728,624 in interest-bearing deposits was covered by collateral held under the Pooling Method.

At June 30, 2022, the District had $350 cash on hand.

43

B. Investments As of June 30, 2022, the District had the following investments and maturities.

Investment Type

US Treasuries US Government Agencies Municipal Bond Commercial Paper NC Capital Management Trust– Government Total

Valuation Measurement Method Fair Value –Level 1 Fair Value –Level 2 Fair Value –Level 1 Fair Value –Level 2 Fair Value –Level 1

Fair Value

Less Than 6 Months

$ 27,877,555 $ 27,877,555

6 to 12 Months

1 to 3 Years

3 to 5 Years

N/A

N/A

N/A

17,410,099

17,410,099

N/A

N/A

N/A

500,000

500,000

N/A

N/A

N/A

15,275,590

9,379,081

5,896,509

N/A

N/A

22,427,024 22,427,024 N/A $ 83,490,268 $ 77,593,759 $ 5,896,509

N/A N/A

N/A N/A

All investments are measured using the market approach: using prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or a group of assets.

Level of fair value hierarchy: Level 1: Debt securities valued using directly observable, quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets. Level 2: Debt securities are valued using a matrix pricing technique. Matrix pricing is used to value securities based on the securities’ relationship to benchmark quoted prices.

 Interest Rate Risk—As a means of limiting its exposure to changes in fair value arising from rising interest rates, the District’s formally adopted investment policy calls for structuring the investment portfolio so that securities mature to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations and/or scheduled debt service, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market prior to maturity. In addition, the District invests operating funds primarily in shorter-term securities.  Credit Risk—Credit risk is the risk of loss due to the failure of the security issuer or backer.

The District’s formally adopted investment policy mitigates credit risk by limiting investments to the safest types of securities and restricts the purchase of securities to the highest possible ratings whenever particular types of securities are rated. As of June 30, 2022, the District’s investments in commercial paper were at least P-1 by Standard & Poor’s, F-1 by Fitch Ratings, and A-1 by Moody’s Investors Service. The District’s investments in the NC Capital Management Trust Government Portfolio carried a credit rating of AAAm by Standard & Poor’s as of June 30, 2022. The District’s investments in US Agencies(Federal Home Loan Bank) are rated AAA by Standard & Poor’s and Aaa by Moody's Investors Service.

44

 Custodial Credit Risk—For an investment, custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the District will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The District’s formally adopted investment policy requires all transactions to be conducted on a delivery-versus-payment (DVP) basis and to be held by a contracted third-party custodian and evidenced by safekeeping receipts. At June 30, 2022, the District did not have any investments exposed to custodial credit risk.  Concentration of Credit Risk—The District’s investment policy mitigates concentration of credit risk, that is, the risk from the failure of any one entity or industry, by limiting the maximum amount of the District’s portfolio that may be invested in Bankers’ Acceptances and Commercial Paper to 20% each.

In addition, the District’s formally adopted policy limits investment in any single issue of a nongovernmental entity to the greater of $5,000,000 or 1% of the entire portfolio.

C.

Hedging Derivative Instrument

At June 30, 2022, the District had the following hedging derivative instrument: Changes in Fair Value Type

Objective

Valuation Measurement Method

Notional Amount

Classification

Fair Value Level 2

$22,860,000

Deferred Outflow of Resources

Amount

Fair Value - June 30, 2022 Effective Maturity Date Date

Classification

Amount

Debt

$ (809,389)

Cash Flow Hedge: Pay-Fixed Hedge of Interest changes in Rate Swap cash flows on the 2005/2008A Series Revenue Refunding Bonds

$2,209,435 1/6/2005 7/1/2031

The fair value of the interest rate swap is determined using Level 2 inputs of the fair value hierarchy. Inputs used in determining the fair value of the interest rate swap include both observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs include the notional amount as shown above and the variable and fixed rates within the swap agreement as disclosed in Note 3c. Unobservable inputs include quoted market prices for similar instruments, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques.

The mark-to-market valuation was established by market quotations from the counterparty representing estimates of the amounts that would be paid for replacement transactions. Because

45

the coupons on the District’s variable-rate bonds adjust to changing interest rates, the bonds do not have a corresponding fair value increase.  Objective—As a means to lower its borrowing costs, when compared against fixed-rate bonds at the time of issuance in January 2005, the District issued variable interest rate debt and entered into an interest rate exchange agreement (swap) in connection with its variable rate Series 2005 Revenue Refunding Bonds in the amount of $33,915,000. The intention of the swap was to effectively change the District’s variable interest rate on the bonds to a synthetic fixed rate of 3.4175%.

In April 2008, the District issued $33,635,000 in Series 2008A Revenue Refunding Bonds to currently refund the Series 2005 Revenue Refunding Bonds. The swap described above now applies to the Series 2008A Revenue Refunding Bonds. In April of 2020, the District amended the swap to eliminate the London Interbank Offered Rate(LIBOR) rate it receives as a variable payment. As a result the new synthetic fixed rate is 3.2910%.  Terms—Under the initial terms of the swap, the District pays the counterparty a fixed payment of 3.4175% and receives a variable payment computed as 59% of the one-month LIBOR plus 35 basis points. In April of 2020, the District amended the term of the swap, the District pays the counterparty a fixed payment of 3.2910% and receives a variable payment computed as 100% of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA).

The swap had an initial notional amount equal to the associated Series 2005 variable rate bond principal amount of $33,915,000. The swap was entered into at the same time the Series 2005 Bonds were issued in January of 2005.

Starting in Fiscal Year 2006, the notional value of the swap and the principal amount of the associated debt declined in equal amounts. As the swap now applies to the Series 2008A Bonds, the remaining notional value of the swap is correlated to the variable rate bond principal amount of $33,635,000. Starting in Fiscal Year 2010, the notional value of the swap and the principal amount associated debt decline in similar amounts until the debt is completely retired. The notional amount outstanding is $22,860,000 as of June 30, 2022.

The bonds’ variable rate coupons are determined by the remarketing agent based on prevailing market conditions. This usually approximates SIFMA. The bonds and the related swap agreement both mature on July 1, 2031.

46

 Credit Risk—As of June 30, 2022, the District was not exposed to credit risk because the swap had a negative fair value. However, should interest rates change and the fair value of the swap becomes positive, the District would be exposed to credit risk in the amount of the swap’s fair value. The swap counterparty was rated Aa2 by Moody’s and A+ by Standard & Poor’s, and AA

by Fitch Ratings as of June 30, 2022. To mitigate the potential credit risk, if the counterparty’s credit quality falls below Baa3 (Moody’s) and BBB-(S&P), the value of the swap may be fully collateralized by the counterparty or by several other means specified in the International Swap Dealers Association (ISDA) Master Agreement and Counterparty Schedule.  Interest Rate/Basis Risk—As noted above, the swap exposes the District to basis risk should the relationship between SIFMA and the bonds’ variable rate coupns determined by the remarketing agent, changing the synthetic rate on the bonds.

The effect of this difference in basis is indicated by the difference between the intended synthetic rate of 3.2910% and the actual synthetic rate for the period ending June 30, 2022 of 3.2110%. As of June 30, 2022, the rate on the District’s bonds was 0.90% whereas 100% of SIFMA was 0.98%. If a change occurs that results in the rates moving in a direction unfavorable to the District, the expected cost savings may not be realized.  Termination Risk—The interest rate exchange contract uses the ISDA Master Agreement, which includes standard termination events, such as failure to pay and bankruptcy. The ISDA Schedule to the Master Agreement includes an “additional termination event.” That is, the swap may be terminated by the District if the counterparty’s credit quality rating falls below Baa3 (Moody’s) and BBB-(S&P). The District or the counterparty may terminate the swap if the other party fails to perform under the terms of the contract. If the swap was terminated, the variable-rate bonds would no longer carry a synthetic interest rate. In addition, if at the time of termination the swap has a negative fair value, the District would be liable to the counterparty for a payment equal to the swap’s fair value.  Market Access Risk/Rollover Risk—The District’s interest rate exchange contract is for the term (maturity) of the bonds and, therefore, there is no market-access risk or rollover risk.

47

Note 3—Long-Term Obligations A. Long-Term Debt The District issues debt to help finance the cost of rehabilitation of wastewater interceptor and collection infrastructure, and treatment plant facilities. All debt is secured by a pledge of and payable from net receipts and certain other moneys. In the event of a default, the District agrees to pay to the purchaser, on demand, interest on any and all amounts due and owing by the District under the related agreements. Unlike cities and counties, the District has no legal debt limit.

However, the District must comply with the legal requirements contained in its Bond Order as described in Note 11.

The District’s borrowings are subject to federal arbitrage regulations; however, management does not anticipate any material liability for arbitrage from any of these debt issues.

The District currently has the following issues outstanding: Original Issue Amount

Revenue Bonds: Enka-Candler Water & Sewer District Bonds Series 2008A, Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2013, Revenue Refunding Bonds Series 2014, Revenue Bonds Series 2017, Revenue and Refunding Bonds

$

1,451,000 33,635,000 30,230,000 26,195,000 37,485,000

$

672,980

Direct Borrowings - State Revolving Fund: 2009 North Carolina Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund

48

The following is a summary of changes in the Districts’ long-term debt for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2022: BALANCE JULY 1, 2021

ADDITIONS

RETIREMENTS

BALANCE JUNE 30, 2022

Revenue Bonds: Enka-Candler Water and Sewer District Bonds liability assumed by the Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, North Carolina on July 2, 1990 as stated in the sewer consolidation agreement: 5.00% serial bonds assumed July 2, 1990 with maturities on each June 1, through 2024 varying from $19,000 to $64,000, interest payable annually

$

148,000 $

- $

64,000 $

84,000

Total Bonds – Enka-Candler Series

$

148,000

- $

64,000 $

84,000

$

Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008A issued to refund the Series 2005 Revenue Refunding Bonds: Interest at variable rates in the weekly mode, payable monthly, due serially until 2031 Total Bonds – Series 2008A

$ $

25,070,000 $ 25,070,000 $

- $ - $

2,160,000 $ 22,910,000 2,160,000 $ 22,910,000

Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 issued to refund Series 2003 and Series 2008B Revenue Refunding Bond: 2.0% to 5.00% serial bonds issued May 1, 2013, with maturities on each July 1, 2014 through 2029 varying from $1,065,000 to $4,255,000: interest payable semi-annually Total Bond – Series 2013

$

11,965,000 $

- $

1,830,000 $ 10,135,000

$

11,965,000 $

- $

1,830,000 $ 10,135,000

Revenue Bonds, Series 2014 issued to construct certain sewerage projects: 2.0% to 5.00% serial bonds issued May 21, 2014, with maturities on each July 1, 2016 through 2039 varying from $535,000 to $1,430,000: interest payable semi-annually

$

17,400,000 $

- $

810,000 $ 16,590,000

5.00% term bonds issued May 21, 2014, at 112.950%, due July 1, 2039: interest payable semi-annually Total Bond – Series 2014

$ $

4,685,000 $ 22,085,000 $

- $ - $

- $ 4,685,000 810,000 $ 21,275,000

49

BALANCE JULY 1, 2021

ADDITIONS

RETIREMENTS

BALANCE JUNE 30, 2022

Revenue Bonds (continued): Revenue Bonds, Series 2017 issued to construct certain sewerage projects and to refund portions of Series 2009A: 3.0% to 5.00% serial bonds issued July 11, 2017, with maturities on each July 1, 2018 through 2039 varying from $620,000 to $2,260,000: interest payable semi-annually $ 30,555,000 $ - $ 1,240,000 $ 29,315,000 5.00% term bonds issued July 11, 2017, at 97.704%, due July 1, 2042: interest payable semi-annually Total Bond – Series 2017 Total Revenue Bonds

$ $

4,520,000 35,075,000

$ $

- $ - $

- $ 4,520,000 1,240,000 $ 33,835,000

$

94,343,000

$

- $

6,104,000 $ 88,239,000

Direct Borrowings - State Revolving Fund: 2009 North Carolina Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund used to construct certain sewerage projects: $672,980 revolving loan issued August 18, 2009 unpaid principal sum is reduced by one-half as "Principal Forgiveness", interest accrues at 0%, 20 annual installments May 1, 2011 to 2030 $ 151,415 $ - $ 16,825 $ 134,590 Total Direct Borrowings - State Revolving Fund

$

Total Long-Term Obligations Plus, net unamortized discounts and premiums $

151,415 $

- $

16,825 $

134,590

94,494,415

-

6,120,825

88,373,590

3,867,494

-

668,512

3,198,982

98,361,909 $

- $

6,789,337 $ 91,572,572

Series 2008A Series 2013 Series 2014 Series 2017 Direct Borrowings - 2009 State Revolving Fund Enka-Candler

2,160,000 1,830,000 810,000 1,240,000

2,235,000 1,915,000 835,000 1,295,000

16,825 64,000

16,825 64,000

Less current portion

6,120,825

6,360,825

92,241,084

$ 85,211,747

$

50

Maturities of long-term debt are as follows:

Year Ending June 30: 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027

Serial Maturity $ 6,360,825 5,631,824 6,360,824 5,091,824 5,281,824 5,481,823 27,848,120

Principal Mandatory Sinking Fund Requirements (Term Bonds) Total Interest $ - $ 6,360,825 $ 3,341,414 5,631,824 3,102,843 735,000 5,826,824 2,869,912 770,000 6,051,824 2,633,643 810,000 6,291,823 2,382,372 2,315,000 30,163,120 14,330,184

Five Years: 2032 2037 2042 2043

24,405,470 13,500,000 4,130,000 $ 69,883,590 $

4,725,000 2,245,000 7,650,000 1,555,000 18,490,000 $

29,130,470 8,089,031 15,745,000 3,789,512 11,780,000 1,161,822 1,555,000 24,297 88,373,590 $ 27,394,846

The revenue bonds are secured by and payable solely from all sewer revenues of the District after provisions for operating expenses and from certain reserves and other monies of the District, as described in the Bond Order. Additional remittance requirements to the trustee for a sinking fund to redeem the term bonds, subordinated indebtedness outstanding, if any, and other purposes are set forth in the Bond Order.

B. Variable Debt  Interest Rates—Interest rates for variable debt change weekly as determined by the responsible remarketing agent based on competitive municipal bond rates in the secondary market.

 Liquidity Agreement—The District has entered into a remarketing agreement with Wells Fargo to perform various functions in connection with the Series 2008A variable debt. The Remarketing Agent’s major responsibilities include soliciting of purchases of Bonds from qualified investors, processing and recordkeeping for such purchases, billing and receiving payment for Bonds purchased, and determining the interest rate on the Bonds as provided in the Series Resolution.

51

C. Hedging Derivative and Associated Hedged Debt As of June 30, 2022, debt service requirements of the variable-rate debt and net swap payments, assuming current interest rates remain the same for their term, were as follows.

As rates vary, variable-rate bond interest payments and net swap payments will vary.

Fiscal Year Ending June 30 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032

Variable Rate Bonds Principal 2,235,000 2,320,000 2,400,000 2,485,000 2,585,000 2,685,000 2,785,000 2,890,000 1,240,000 1,285,000 $ 22,910,000

$

Interest Rate

Interest 187,751 166,935 145,395 123,094 99,904 75,814 50,824 24,893 12,495 964 $ 888,069 $

Swap, Net 482,103 428,652 373,342 316,077 256,531 194,673 130,504 63,918 32,084 2,475 $ 2,280,359 $

Total 2,904,854 2,915,587 2,918,737 2,924,171 2,941,435 2,955,487 2,966,328 2,978,811 1,284,579 1,288,439 $ 26,078,428 $

The computations above are based on the following interest assumptions.

Terms

Rates at June 30, 2022

Interest Rate Swap: Fixed Payment to Counterparty Variable Payment from Counterparty Net Interest Rate Swap Payments Variable-rate Bond Coupon Payments Synthetic Interest Rate on Bonds

Fixed 100% of SIFMA Remarketed Rate

3.2910% (0.9800%) 2.3110% 0.9000% 3.2110%

D. Compensated Absences Changes to the liability for compensated absences were as follows: Balance - June 30, 2021 Additions Withdrawals Balance - June 30, 2022

$

$

887,292 703,749 (707,867) 883,174

52

The District accounts for compensated absences on a LIFO basis, assuming that employees are taking leave time as it is earned. For the year ended June 30, 2022, the District estimates that $60,000 is the current portion of this liability.

E. Net Pension Liability (LGERS) Changes to the net pension liability (LGERS) were as follows: Balance - June 30, 2021 Additions Withdrawals Balance - June 30, 2022

$

$

4,173,404 (2,370,202) 1,803,202

53

Note 4—Capital Assets A summary of changes in capital assets follows below.

Balance June 30, 2021

Additions

Disposals

Balance June 30, 2022

Transfers

Capital Assets Not Being Depreciated Land Easements Construction in Progress Total Capital Assets Not Being Depreciated

$

2,773,980 $ - $ 11,117,028 20,770,543 14,984,686

-

34,661,551 14,984,686

-

$

- $ 318,294 (8,605,676)

2,773,980 11,435,322 27,149,553

(8,287,382)

41,358,855

Capital Assets Being Depreciated Bldgs. & Waste Treatment Plants Improvements & Other than Bldgs.

Machinery & Equipment Interceptor Sewer Lines Collector Lines Automobiles & Trucks Computer Equipment Office Furniture & Equipment Total Capital Assets Being Depreciated

49,092,193

-

(27,547)

-

49,064,646

7,431,575 77,124,513 126,477,532 404,428,663 6,405,215 1,278,115 631,757

103,634 3,348,111 652,082 -

(12,494) (74,383) (221,643) (970,744) (124,011) (8,026)

1,100,973 92,875 2,714 7,069,891 20,929 -

8,520,054 77,246,639 126,480,246 414,625,022 6,086,553 1,175,033 623,731

672,869,563

4,103,827

(1,438,848)

8,287,382

683,821,924

Less Accumulated Depreciation Bldgs. & Waste Treatment Plants Improvements & Other than Bldgs.

Machinery & Equipment Interceptor Sewer Lines Collector Lines Automobiles & Trucks Computer Equipment Office Furniture & Equipment

(24,485,961)

(975,906)

27,547

-

(25,434,320)

(5,672,019) (48,104,848) (29,503,018) (96,829,885) (4,485,331) (1,271,289) (595,863)

(320,284) (3,527,997) (1,385,090) (5,521,866) (586,382) (8,038) (13,481)

12,494 73,180 221,643 951,208 124,011 8,026

-

(5,979,809) (51,559,665) (30,888,108) (102,130,108) (4,120,505) (1,155,316) (601,318)

1,418,109

-

(221,869,149)

(20,739)

8,287,382

461,952,775

Total Accumulated Depreciation (210,948,214) (12,339,044) Total Capital Assets Being Depreciated, Net

461,921,349

(8,235,217)

$ 496,582,900 $ 6,749,469 $

(20,739) $

- $ 503,311,630

54

 Contributed Infrastructure—The District’s responsibility is to maintain existing collector and interceptor sewer lines as well as to provide wastewater treatment. The majority of sewer lines added to the District are constructed by member agencies or developers and donated to the District. Occasionally, owners of private lines will petition the District to take over their sewer lines as well. This infrastructure must meet minimum District engineering standards, and when accepted by Board action, the District assumes all responsibility for future maintenance and rehabilitation. During the year ended June 30, 2022, the District accepted capital assets with an acquisition value of $3,348,109.

 Easements—The District acquires right-of-way easements in the course of sewer line rehabilitation projects. These easements have an indefinite useful life and are recorded at cost.

Note 5—Pension Plan Obligation A. North Carolina Local Governmental Employees' Retirement System 

Plan Description—The District is a participating employer in the statewide Local

Governmental Employees’ Retirement System (LGERS), a cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan administered by the State of North Carolina. LGERS membership is comprised of general employees and local law enforcement officers (LEOs) of participating local governmental entities. Article 3 of G.S. Chapter 128 assigns the authority to establish and amend benefit provisions to the North Carolina General Assembly. Management of the plan is vested in the LGERS Board of Trustees, which consists of 13 members – nine appointed by the Governor, one appointed by the State Senate, one appointed by the State House of Representatives, and the State Treasurer and State Superintendent, who serve as ex-officio members. The Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System is included in the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the State of North Carolina. The State’s Report includes financial statements and required supplementary information for LGERS. That report may be obtained by writing to the Office of the State Controller, 1410 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1410, by calling (919) 981-5454, or at www.osc.nc.gov.

55



Benefits Provided—LGERS provides retirement and survivor benefits. Retirement benefits are

determined as 1.85% of the member’s average final compensation times the member’s years of creditable service. A member’s average final compensation is calculated as the average of a member’s four highest consecutive years of compensation. Plan members are eligible to retire with full retirement benefits at age 65 with five years of creditable service, at age 60 with 25 years of creditable service, or at any age with 30 years of creditable service. Plan members are eligible to retire with partial retirement benefits at age 50 with 20 years of creditable service or at age 60 with five years of creditable service. Survivor benefits are available to eligible beneficiaries of members who die while in active service or within 180 days of their last day of service and who have either completed 20 years of creditable service regardless of age or have completed five years of service and have reached age 60.

Eligible beneficiaries may elect to receive a monthly Survivor’s Alternate Benefit for life or a return of the member’s contributions. The plan does not provide for automatic post-retirement benefit increases. Increases are contingent upon actuarial gains of the plan.



Contributions—Contribution provisions are established by General Statute 128-30 and may be

amended only by the North Carolina General Assembly. District employees are required to contribute 6% of their compensation. Employer contributions are actuarially determined and set annually by the LGERS Board of Trustees. The District’s contractually required contribution rate for the year ended June 30, 2022 was 11.35% for general employees actuarially determined as an amount that, when combined with employee contributions, is expected to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year. Contributions to the pension plan from the District were $1,024,648 for the year ended June 30, 2022.



Refunds of Contributions—District employees, who have terminated service as a contributing

member of LGERS, may file an application for a refund of their contributions. By state law, refunds to members with at least five years of service include 4% interest. State law requires a 60-day waiting period after service termination before the refund may be paid. The acceptance of a refund payment cancels the individual’s right to employer contributions, or any other benefit provided by LGERS.

56



Pension Liabilities, Pension Expense, Deferred Outflows of Resources, and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions—At June 30, 2022, the District reported a liability

of $1,803,202 for its proportionate share of the net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2021. The total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of December 31, 2020.

The total pension liability was then rolled forward to the measurement date of June 30, 2021 utilizing update procedures incorporating the actuarial assumptions. The District’s proportion of the net pension liability was based on a projection of the District’s long-term share of future payroll covered by the pension plan, relative to the projected future payroll covered by the pension plan of all participating LGERS employers, actuarially determined. At June 30, 2022, the District’s proportion was 0.11758% measured as of June 30, 2021, which was a decrease of 0.00079% from its proportion measured as of June 30, 2020.

For the year ended June 30, 2022, the District recognized pension expense of $813,160. At June 30, 2022, the District reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:

Differences between expected and actual experience Changes in assumptions Net difference between projected and actual investment earnings Changes in proportion and difference between employer contributions and proportionate share of contributions District’s contribution subsequent to the measurement date Total

Deferred Deferred Outflows of Inflows of Resources Resources $ 573,663 $ 1,132,872 -

$

-

2,576,234

80,423 1,024,648

11,200 -

2,811,606 $

2,587,434

$1,024,648 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from District contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a decrease of the net pension liability in the year ending June 30, 2023.

57

Other amounts reported as deferred inflows and outflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Year Ending June 30: 2022 2023 2024 2025



$

197,274 (31,069) (178,337) (788,344)

Actuarial Assumptions—The total pension liability in the December 31, 2020 actuarial

valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement: Inflation Salary increases Investment rate of return

2.5 percent 3.25 to 8.25 percent, including inflation and productivity factor 6.5 percent, net of pension plan investment expense, including inflation

The plan currently uses mortality tables that vary by age, gender, employee group (i.e., general, law enforcement officer) and health status (i.e., disabled and healthy). The current mortality rates are based on published tables and based on studies that cover significant portions of the U.S. population. The healthy mortality rates also contain a provision to reflect future mortality improvements.

The actuarial assumptions used in the December 31, 2020 valuation were based on the results of an actuarial experience study for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2019.

Future ad hoc COLA amounts are not considered to be substantively automatic and are therefore not included in the measurement.

The projected long-term investment returns and inflation assumptions are developed through review of current and historical capital markets data, sell-side investment research, consultant whitepapers, and historical performance of investment strategies. Fixed income return projections reflect current yields across the U.S. Treasury yield curve and market expectations of forward yields projected and interpolated for multiple tenors and over multiple year horizons. Global public equity return projections are established through analysis of the equity risk premium and the fixed income return projections. Other asset categories and strategies’ return projections reflect the foregoing and historical data analysis.

58

These projections are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation.

The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class as of June 30, 2021 are summarized in the following table:

Asset Class

Target Allocation

Fixed Income Global Equity Real Estate Alternatives Credit Inflation Protection Total

29.0% 42.0% 8.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 100%

Long-Term Expected Real Rate of Return 1.4% 5.3% 4.3% 8.9% 6.0% 4.0%

The information above is based on 30-year expectations developed with the consulting actuary for the 2020 asset liability and investment policy study for the North Carolina Retirement Systems, including LGERS. The long-term nominal rates of return underlying the real rates of return are arithmetic annualized figures. The real rates of return are calculated from nominal rates by multiplicatively subtracting a long-term inflation assumption of 3.05%. All rates of return and inflation are annualized.



Discount Rate—The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 6.50%. The

projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from plan members will be made at the current contribution rate and that contributions from employers will be made at statutorily required rates, actuarially determined.

Based on these assumptions, the pension plan’s fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of the current plan members.

Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.

59



Sensitivity of the District’s Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate—The following presents the District’s proportionate share of the net

pension liability calculated using the discount rate of 6.50%, as well as what the District’s proportionate share of the net pension asset or net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is one percentage point lower (5.50%) or one percentage point higher (7.50%) than the current rate:

1% Decrease (5.50%) District's proportionate share of the net pension liability (asset)



Discount Rate (6.50%)

1% Increase (7.50%)

$ 6,999,881 $ 1,803,202 $ (2,473,362)

Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position—Detailed information about the pension plan’s fiduciary

net position is available in the separately issued Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the State of North Carolina.

B. Supplemental Retirement Income Plan for Non-Law Enforcement Officers 401(k) Plan 

Plan Description—The District contributes to the Supplemental Retirement Income Plan of

North Carolina, often referred to as the State’s 401(k) Plan, a defined contribution pension plan administered by the Department of State Treasurer and a Board of Trustees. The Plan provides retirement benefits to employees of the District who are members of LGERS. Article 5 of G.S. Chapter 135 assigns the authority to establish and amend benefit provisions to the North Carolina General Assembly.



Funding Policy—Employee contributions are voluntary and must conform to applicable IRS

limits. The District has a graduated matching contribution plan as follows: if an employee contributes 1%, 2%, or 3%, the District will contribute 2%, 4%, or 5%, respectively, of their salary to either the 401(k) Plan or the 457 Plan described below. The District Board has the authority to establish and amend contribution requirements. During the year ended June 30, 2022, a total of $384,995 and $447,369 were contributed by the District and employees, respectively.

60

C. Deferred Compensation Plan 

Plan Description—The District also offers its employees a Deferred Compensation Plan,

another type of defined contribution plan, established under the Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The Plan allows employees to defer receipt and taxation of a portion of their salary until future years.

The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseeable emergency. The Plan is administered by a third-party administrator who establishes and amends benefit provisions within the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Section 457.

All amounts of compensation deferred under the Plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, property, and rights (until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) are held in trust for the exclusive benefit of participants and their beneficiaries. As such, these assets and the related obligations are not reported in these financial statements.



Funding Policy—Employee contributions are voluntary and must conform to applicable IRS

limits. The District has a graduated matching contribution plan as follows: if an employee contributes 1%, 2%, or 3%, the District will contribute 2%, 4%, or 5%, respectively, of their salary to either the 401(k) Plan described above or a 401(a) Plan. The District Board has the authority to establish and amend contribution requirements. During the year ended June 30, 2022, $25,584 and $24,311 were contributed by the District and employees, respectively, to the deferred compensation plan.

Note 6—Other Employment Benefits A. Death Benefits 

Plan Description—The District has elected to provide death benefits to employees through

the Death Benefit Plan for Members of the Local Governmental Employees' Retirement System (Death Benefit Plan), a multiple-employer State-administered cost-sharing plan funded on a one-year term cost basis. The beneficiaries of those employees who die in active service after one year of contributing membership in the System, or who die within 180 days after retirement or termination of service and have at least one year of contributing membership service in the System at the time of death are eligible for death benefits. Lump sum death benefit payments to beneficiaries are equal to the employee's 12 highest months’ salary in a 61

row during the 24 months prior to his/her death, but the benefit may not be below $25,000 or exceed $50,000. All death benefit payments are made from the Death Benefit Plan. The District has no liability beyond the payment of monthly contributions. Contributions are determined as a percentage of monthly payroll, based upon rates established annually by the State.

Because the benefit payments are made by the Death Benefit Plan and not by the District, the District does not determine the number of eligible participants. The contributions to the Death Benefit Plan cannot be separated between the post-employment benefit amount and the other benefit amount. Contributions are determined as a percentage of monthly payroll based upon rates established annually by the State. The District considers these contributions to be immaterial.

Note 7—Other Post-Employment Benefits A. Healthcare Benefits 

Plan Description—Under terms of a District resolution, the District administers a single-

employer defined benefit group health and dental insurance plan (the GHD Plan). The District Board has the authority to establish and amend the benefit terms and financing requirements.

No assets are accumulated in a trust. However as of June 30, 2022, the District set aside $2,404,676. These funds are to be used to meet the District’s future post-employment obligation.



Benefits Provided—As of May 14, 2008, the plan allows retirees to continue coverage under

the Districts' self-insured group health and dental insurance plan until the earlier of reaching age 65; or becoming covered under another group medical plan; or failing to timely pay any required premium for such coverage.

The District will pay the premium cost for the eligible retired employee as follows: Years of Service 30 years at any age 25 years at 55 years of age 20 years at 55 years of age 15 years at 55 years of age 10 years at 55 years of age 5 years at 55 years of age

Subsidy Vesting % 100% 90% 80% 65% 55% - Existing Employees 50% - Employees hired after 7/1/08 50% - Existing Employees

62

In addition, the District’s retirees can purchase coverage for their spouse at full actuarial cost.

The District’s Board may amend the benefit provisions. A separate report was not issued for the plan.

Membership in the District’s GHD Plan consisted of the following at July 1, 2021, the date of the latest actuarial valuation: Employees Retirees Receiving Benefits Active Plan Members Total

18 146 164

B. Total OPEB Liability The District’s total OPEB liability of $4,049,000 was measured as of July 1, 2021 and was determined by an actuarial valuation as of July 1, 2021.

 Actuarial Assumptions and Other Inputs—The total OPEB liability in the July 1, 2021 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions and other inputs, applied to all periods included in the measurement unless otherwise specified: Salary Increases Discount Rate Healthcare cost trend rates

3.00 percent 1.92 percent 6.50 percent for fiscal year end 2022, decreasing 0.25 percent per year to an ultimate rate of 5.00 percent

The discount rate is based on the yield of the Fidelity Municipal Bond 20-Year Municipal GO AA Index as of the measurement date.

63

 Changes in the Total OPEB Liability— Total OPEB Liability $ 3,674,000

Balance at July 1, 2021 Changes for the year Service cost Interest Changes of benefit terms Differences between expected and actual experience Changes in assumptions or other inputs Other changes Benefit payments Net changes Total

212,000 92,000 181,000 134,000 (244,000) 375,000 $

4,049,000

Mortality rates were based on the RP-2014 Fully Generation Mortality Table, with base year 2006, using two-dimensional improvement scale MP-2021.

The actuarial assumptions used in the July 1, 2021 valuation were based on the results of an actuarial experience study for the period July 2020 through June 2021.

 Sensitivity of the Total OPEB Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate —The following presents the total OPEB liability of the District, as well as what the District’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage-point lower (.92 percent) or 1-percentage-point higher (2.92 percent) than the current discount rate:

Total OPEB Liability

Discount Rate 1% Decrease (1.92%) 1% Increase $ 4,310,000 $ 4,049,000 $ 3,799,000

64

 Sensitivity of the Total OPEB Liability to Changes in the Healthcare Cost Trend Rates —The following presents the total OPEB liability of the District, as well as what the District’s total OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are 1percentage-point lower (5.5 percent) or 1-percentage-point higher (7.50 percent) than the current healthcare cost trend rates: Discount Rate (Medical-6.5%)

1% Decrease Total OPEB Liability

$

3,684,000 $

1% Increase

4,049,000 $

4,472,000

 OPEB Expense, Deferred Outflows of Resources, and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to OPEB—For the year ended June 30, 2022, the District recognized OPEB expense of

$418,360. At June 30, 2022, the District reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources: Deferred Outflows of Resources Differences between expected and actual experience Changes in assumptions Benefit payments and administrative costs made subsequent to the measurement date Total

$

220,000 499,000

Deferred Inflows of Resources $

249,000 $

968,000

148,000 -

$

148,000

$249,000 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB resulting from benefit payments made and administrative expenses incurred subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a decrease of the total OPEB liability in the year ended June 30, 2023.

Other amounts reported as deferred inflows and outflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in OPEB expense as follows: Year Ending June 30: 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Thereafter

$

97,000 138,000 146,000 108,000 61,000 21,000

65

Note 8—Risk Management The District has established a self-insured group health and dental insurance program, which provides medical coverage up to a maximum of $70,000 per employee, and approximately $2,500,000 in the aggregate. The District purchases commercial insurance for claims in excess of coverage.

All employees participate in the program and are responsible for premium and co-payment amounts as determined by the District. Charges to the Enterprise Fund are adjusted annually so that the program revenues and expenses are approximately equal and there is an adequate amount in reserves in the event the District decides to discontinue the plan. The accrued self-insurance claims liability of $247,062 reported at June 30, 2022 represents estimated claims liabilities, including incurred but not reported losses, at the estimated ultimate cost of settling the claims using historical experience as determined by the Third-Party Administrator (TPA).

Changes since inception in the claim’s liability amount are as follows:

Fiscal Years Ended June 30 2021 2022

Beginning of Fiscal Year Liability $ 202,780 $ 505,657

Current Year Claims & Changes in Estimates $ 2,187,738 $ 2,131,940

Claim Payments $ 1,884,861 $ 2,390,535

Balances at Fiscal Year End $ 505,657 $ 247,062

The District is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. The District participates in two self-funded risk-financing pools administered by the North Carolina League of Municipalities.

Through these pools, the District obtains general liability and auto liability coverage, property coverage up to the total insurance values of the property policy, and workers’ compensation coverage up to statutory limits. The pools are reinsured through commercial companies for single occurrence claims against general liability, auto liability, and property in excess of $500,000 and $300,000 up to statutory limits for workers’ compensation. The property liability pool has an aggregate limit for the total property losses in a single year, with the reinsurance limit based upon a percentage of the total insurance values.

The District carries commercial coverage for all other risks of loss. There have been no significant reductions in insurance coverage in the prior year and settled claims have not exceeded coverage in any of the past three fiscal years.

66

The District carries flood insurance through the National Flood Insurance Plan (NFIP). Because the District’s structures, situated adjacent to the French Broad River, are in an “A” area designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the District has purchased coverage in the maximum amount of $500,000 through the NFIP for each eligible structure. Management believes this will be adequate to remediate flood damage to exposed buildings and their contents.

In accordance with G.S. 159-29, the District has adopted a system of blanket faithful performance bonds for all employees and has purchased coverage of $100,000 from a commercial insurance carrier. The Finance Officer is individually bonded for $250,000.

Note 9—Construction in Progress and Future Expansion Plans During the year ended June 30, 2002, consulting engineers finalized a comprehensive twenty-year Wastewater System Master Plan to guide the District in reducing sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) as well as keeping up with the maintenance and management of its infrastructure. The plan estimated that the District would need to spend approximately $257 million over a twenty-year period. Portions of this Master Plan are periodically updated as required to meet the needs identified by engineering staff for the Water Reclamation Facility and the collector and interceptor sewer lines. The District uses these plans, along with other resources including representatives from the member agencies, to develop a ten-year Capital Improvement Plan projected to spend an average of $38.9 million annually. The District expects to fund these costs out of user charges along with the issuance of additional bonds.

As of June 30, 2022, the District had begun sewer projects expected to incur future costs of approximately $176.4 million, and the District is committed under various contracts encumbered for sewer construction and rehabilitation estimated to cost $10.7 million to complete. The majority of encumbered contracts are expected to be completed within the next fiscal year, and the projects currently under construction are scheduled to be completed within the next two to five years.

Note 10—Bond Covenants The District is subject to the 1999 Amended Bond Order, which contains several operational directives including internal accounting fund structure, disclosure of financial records, and setting rates. A copy of the Bond Order may be obtained by contacting the Director of Finance.

67

The District is required by the 1999 Amended Bond Order to set rates as summarized by the following: The District covenants to set rates and charges so that the Income Available for Debt Service (defined as the excess of “Revenues” over “Current Expenses”) will not be less than the greater of (i) one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Long-Term Debt Service Requirement for Parity Indebtedness only for such Fiscal Year and (ii) one hundred percent (100%) of the Long-Term Debt Service Requirement for Parity Indebtedness and Subordinated Indebtedness for such Fiscal Year.

The definition of revenues for this purpose does not include grants, contributions, investment income credited to non-operating funds, or tap and connection fees. However, tap and connection fees may be considered revenues upon a resolution duly passed by the Board. Current expenses include operating expenses other than additions to reserve funds, depreciation or amortization, or debt service payments.

Long-Term Debt Service Requirement means the aggregate of the required deposits to be made in respect of principal and interest.

The various Bond Series Resolutions require either monthly or semi-annual deposits of the upcoming principal and interest payments to be received by the Trustee at least one day prior to the payment date.

In other words, during the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2022, the Long-Term Debt Service Requirement equaled principal and interest due on January 1, 2022 and July 1, 2022.

68

The District does not currently have any subordinated indebtedness, so the computation of the current fiscal year’s compliance with this covenant is based solely on 120% of the debt service requirement as follows: Operating Revenues Interest and Non-Operating Revenues

$

Adjustments to Revenues: Interest Income allocable to Non-Operating Funds Facility, Tap, and Other Fees Gain on Disposal of Property Adjusted Revenues

48,111,506 505,697

(4,088) (6,036,682) (418,696) 42,157,737

Operating Expenses

(28,696,145)

Adjustments to Expenses: Pension plan and OPEB contributions net of expense Trustee and liquidity expense capitalized Add back Depreciation Adjusted Operating Expenses

(218,502) (122,582) 12,339,044 (16,698,185)

Income Available for Debt Service

$

25,459,552

Long-Term Debt Service Requirement Minimum Required Percentage Minimum Required Income

$

9,797,850 120% 11,757,420

$

Therefore, the District believes it is in compliance with the rate covenant as income available for debt service is in excess of 120% of the annual required debt service. The actual coverage ratio is 260%.

69

Note 11—Deferred Outflows and Inflows of Resources Deferred Outflows of Resources Unamortized bond refunding charges

$

Deferred Inflows of Resources

1,216,305

$

-

Accumulated decrease in fair value of hedging derivative

809,389

-

Pensions – difference between expected and actual experience

573,663

-

1,132,872

-

-

2,576,234

80,423

11,200

1,024,648

-

OPEB- difference between expected and actual experience

220,000

148,000

OPEB-Changes in assumptions

499,000

-

OPEB-benefit payments and administrative cost made subsequent to measurement date

249,000

-

Pensions – change in assumptions Pensions – net difference between projected and actual investment earnings Pensions – changes in proportion and difference between employer contributions and proportionate share of contributions Contributions to pension plan made subsequent to measurement date

Total

$

5,805,300

$

2,735,434

Note 12—Hydroelectric Power The District operates a hydroelectric generation facility on the French Broad River in proximity to the wastewater treatment plant. In some years with above average rainfall, sufficient quantities of electricity are produced to supply all of the plant’s needs with excess electricity generated being sold to Duke Energy Progress. During the year ended June 30, 2022, the District generated power used by the plant, which was estimated to have a net cost after deducting expenditures to generate such power of approximately $295,836 if purchased. This is considerably lower from the prior year due to lower rainfall levels.

Note 13—Claims and Judgments The District may be a party to lawsuits arising from the ordinary conduct of business. In the opinion of management, settlement of actual or possible litigation, if any, will not have a material effect on the financial position of the District.

70

Required Supplemental Information

This page intentionally left blank.

Local Government Employees’ Retirement System Required Supplemental Information Schedule of the District’s Proportionate Share of the Net Position Liability (Asset) Last Nine Fiscal Years*

2022 District's proportion of the net pension liability (asset) %

0.118%

2021 0.117%

2020 0.119%

2019 0.120%

2018 0.124%

2017 0.126%

2016

2015

0.126%

2014

0.125%

0.126%

District's proportionate share of the net pension liability (asset) $

$ 1,803,202 $ 4,173,404 $ 3,257,717 $ 2,851,318 $ 1,896,515 $ 2,678,811 $

District's covered payroll

$ 9,159,822 $ 9,236,242 $ 9,081,052 $ 8,788,983 $ 8,600,473 $ 8,383,296 $ 8,043,516 $ 7,906,515 $ 7,768,717

District's proportionate share of the net pension liability (asset) as a percentage of its covered payroll Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability

563,911 $

(734,825) $ 1,517,578

19.69%

45.19%

35.87%

32.44%

22.05%

31.95%

7.01%

( 9.29%)

19.53%

95.51%

88.61%

90.86%

91.63%

94.18%

91.47%

98.09%

102.64%

94.35%

* The amounts presented for each fiscal year were determined as of the prior Fiscal Year ending June 30.

71

Local Government Employees’ Retirement System Required Supplemental Information Schedule of District Contributions Last Nine Fiscal Years*

2022 Contractually required contribution Contributions in relation to the contractually required contribution

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

$ 1,024,648 $

922,750 $

816,121 $

698,651 $

654,448 $

614,323 $

553,176 $

564,473 $

555,232

$ 1,024,648

922,750

816,121

698,651

654,448

614,323

553,176

564,473

555,232

Contribution deficiency (excess)

$

Districts's covered payroll

$ 9,124,071 $ 9,159,822 $ 9,236,242 $ 9,081,052 $ 8,788,983 $ 8,600,473 $ 8,383,296 $ 8,043,516 $ 7,906,515

Contributions as a percentage of covered payroll

-

11.23%

$

- $

10.07%

- $

8.84%

- $

7.69%

- $

7.45%

- $

7.14%

- $

6.60%

- $

-

7.02%

7.02%

* The amounts presented for each fiscal year were determined as of the prior Fiscal Year ending June 30.

72

Schedule of Changes in the Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios Last Five Fiscal Years* 2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

Total OPEB Liability Service cost

$

Interest

212,000 $ 189,000 $ 162,000 $ 161,000

$

156,000

92,000 -

113,000

109,000

110,000

106,000

-

-

-

-

181,000

(75,000)

124,000

(441,000)

-

134,000

159,000

433,000

188,000

-

(244,000)

(294,000)

(168,000)

(69,000)

(226,000)

375,000

92,000

660,000

(51,000)

36,000

3,674,000

3,582,000

2,922,000

2,973,000

2,937,000

Total OPEB liability - ending

$ 4,049,000 $ 3,674,000 $ 3,582,000 $ 2,922,000

$ 2,973,000

Covered-employee payroll

$ 8,916,369 $ 8,335,863 $ 8,335,863 $ 8,502,682

$ 8,261,415

Changes of benefit terms Differences between expected and actual experience Changes of assumptions Benefit payments Net change in total OPEB liability Total OPEB liability - beginning

Total OPEB liability as a percentage of covered-employee payroll

45.41%

44.07%

42.97%

34.37%

35.99%

* The amounts presented for each fiscal year were determined as of the prior Fiscal Year ending June 30.

Notes to Schedule: Changes of assumptions:

Changes of assumptions and other inputs reflect the effects of changes in the discount rate each period. The following are the discount rates used in each period: 2021

2021

2020

2019

2018

1.92%

2.45%

3.13%

3.62%

3.56%

In 2019, amounts reflect a 1 percentage point increase in healthcare cost trend rates decreasing .50 percent point from the prior year and adjustments in mortality rates to better reflect actual plan experience.

In 2020, amounts reflect a 1 percentage point decrease in healthcare cost trend rates decreasing .25 percent point from the prior year and adjustments in mortality rates to better reflect actual plan experience. Finally, the District also adjusted retirement rates based on actual experience from July 2015 through December 2019. This is to better reflect actual retirement plan experience.

In 2021 and 2022, amounts reflect a .25 percentage point decrease in healthcare cost trend rates decreasing .25 percent point from the prior year and adjustments in mortality rates to better reflect actual plan experience.

No assets have been accumulated in a qualifying trust to pay benefits of the District’s OPEB plan.

73

This page intentionally left blank.

74

Supplemental Financial Data

Comparative Statement of Net Position June 30, 2022 and 2021

2022 Assets: Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Investments Restricted cash and cash equivalents Receivables (net): Accounts Sales Employee Interest Inventories Prepaid expenses Total current assets

$

43,942,852 32,666,087 7,657,635

2021

$

55,035,224 13,996,631 7,482,433

6,967,419 431,438 9,210 29,279 495,586 2,650 92,202,156

6,835,102 467,812 19,480 457,028 2,500 84,296,210

Noncurrent assets: Restricted cash and cash equivalents

1,028,381

1,026,733

Capital Assets: Land Easements Plant and equipment Construction in progress Less: accumulated depreciation Total property and equipment

2,773,980 11,435,322 683,821,924 27,149,553 (221,869,149) 503,311,630

2,773,980 11,117,028 672,869,563 20,770,543 (210,948,214) 496,582,900

504,340,011

497,609,633

596,542,167

581,905,843

Total noncurrent assets Total assets Deferred outflows of resources:

5,805,300

7,674,781

Liabilities and Net Position: Current liabilities: Payments from current assets: Accounts payable and accrued expenses Current portion of compensated absences payable Payments from restricted cash and cash equivalents: Bond interest payable Current portion of long term debt Total current liabilities

5,030,955 60,000

3,963,853 60,000

1,397,744 6,360,825 12,849,524

1,492,202 6,120,825 11,636,880

Noncurrent liabilities: Compensated absences, net of current portion Other post-employment benefit Total pension liability Derivative liability Bonds payable, net of current maturities Total noncurrent liabilities

823,174 4,049,000 1,803,202 809,389 85,211,747 92,696,512

827,292 3,674,000 4,173,404 3,018,824 92,241,084 103,934,604

105,546,036

115,571,484

2,735,434

262,801

412,955,363

399,621,901

6,259,891 1,028,381 73,822,362 494,065,997

5,990,231 1,026,733 67,107,474 473,746,339

Total liabilities Deferred inflows of resources:

Net position: Net investment in capital assets Restricted for: Debt service Bond covenant Unrestricted Total net position

$

$

75

Comparative Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position For the Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 2022 Operating revenues: Sewer charges Facility and tap fees Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Salaries and employee benefits Contractual services Utilities Repairs and maintenance Other supplies and expenses Insurance claims and expenses Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income

$

Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income Interest expense Gain on disposal of surplus property Total nonoperating expenses Income before contributions Capital contribution Special item - Cane Creek Water and Sewer District asset contribution from Henderson County Change in net position

Total net position, beginning of year Total net position, end of year

$

2021

41,484,740 5,966,012 660,754 48,111,506

$

38,591,901 5,092,060 1,770,022 45,453,983

8,427,033 1,798,794 1,446,493 1,026,018 1,325,837 2,332,926 12,339,044 28,696,145 19,415,361

8,640,936 1,810,481 1,105,110 998,183 1,623,222 2,351,485 12,394,875 28,924,292 16,529,691

87,001 (2,949,509) 418,696 (2,443,812) 16,971,549

30,582 (3,110,487) 322,770 (2,757,135) 13,772,556

3,348,109

7,558,647

-

19,936,419

20,319,658

41,267,622

473,746,339

432,478,717

494,065,997

$

473,746,339

76

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures Budget to Actual (Non-GAAP) For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 Amended Budget Revenues: Operating revenues: Sewer charges (net): Domestic users Industrial users Billings and collections

$

Facility and tap fees City of Asheville(Enka Bonds) Rental income Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Nonoperating revenues: Investment income Total nonoperating revenues Total revenues

Expenditures: Operating expenditures: Salaries and employee benefits Contractual services Utilities Repairs and maintenance Other supplies and expenses Insurance claims and expenses Total operating expenditures Capital Projects: Equipment Infrastructure Total capital projects Debt service Principal Interest Total debt service Total Expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Other Financing Sources: Use of available funds

Revenues and other financing sources over (under) expenditures and other financing uses

Actual

34,939,096 3,509,420 952,783 39,401,299

$

36,661,486 3,816,103 1,021,457 41,499,046

$

1,722,390 306,683 68,674 2,097,747

2,175,000 35,000 71,641 450,800 42,133,740

5,966,012 29,274 69,961 561,519 48,125,812

3,791,012 (5,726) (1,680) 110,719 5,992,072

411,275 411,275

87,001 87,001

(324,274) (324,274)

42,545,015

48,212,813

5,667,798

18,365,117

8,343,254 1,798,794 1,446,493 1,026,018 1,325,837 2,591,520 16,531,916

1,833,201

31,632,842

652,082 14,994,227 15,646,309

15,986,533

9,823,943

6,120,825 3,432,826 9,553,651

270,292

59,821,902

41,731,876

18,090,026

(17,276,887)

6,480,937

23,757,824

-

(17,276,887) (17,276,887)

17,276,887 17,276,887

$

Variance Favorable (Unfavorable)

-

$

6,480,937

$

6,480,937

77

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures Budget to Actual (Non-GAAP) For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 (continued) Actual Reconciliation from budgetary basis (modified accrual) to full accrual: Revenues and other financing sources over (under) expenditures and other financing uses

$

Reconciling items: Unamortized discount recognized in interest expense Debt principal payments Capital project transfers Change in allowance for doubtful accounts Change in compensated absences Change in health insurance IBNR Deferred outflows of resources for contributions made in current fiscal year: Pension plan OPEB plan Pension expense OPEB expense Contributed assets Depreciation Gain (loss) on disposal of surplus property

483,907 6,120,825 15,347,557 (14,306) (4,119) 258,594

1,024,648 249,000 (636,786) (418,360) 3,348,109 (12,339,044) 418,696

Total reconciling items Change in net position

6,480,937

13,838,721 $

20,319,658

78

Combining Schedule of Net Position, All Funds (Non-GAAP) As of June 30, 2022 Capital Reserve Account

Enterprise Acccount Assets: Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Investments Restricted cash and cash equivalents Receivables (net): Accounts Sales tax Employee Interest Inventories Prepaid expenses Total current assets

$

41,637,194 30,952,115 -

$

-

6,967,419 238,630 9,210 29,279 495,586 2,650 80,332,083

-

Noncurrent assets: Restricted cash and cash equivalents

-

1,028,381

Capital assets: Land Easements Plant and equipment Construction in progress Less accumulated depreciation Total property and equipment

-

-

80,332,083

1,028,381 1,028,381

3,083,303

-

Total noncurrent assets Total assets

Deferred outflow of resources:

79

Combining Schedule of Net Position, All Funds (Non-GAAP) As of June 30, 2022 (continued) Bond Service Account

$

Construction Account

- $

General Account

Capital Account

2,639 1,961

Total

7,657,635

2,115,790 $ 1,572,829 -

7,657,635

192,808 3,881,427

4,600

326,411

-

-

-

-

1,028,381

-

-

-

2,773,980 11,435,322 683,821,924 27,149,553 (221,869,149) 503,311,630

2,773,980 11,435,322 683,821,924 27,149,553 (221,869,149) 503,311,630

7,657,635

3,881,427

4,600

503,311,630 503,638,041

504,340,011 596,542,167

-

696,303

-

2,025,694

5,805,300

-

187,229 $ 139,182 -

43,942,852 32,666,087 7,657,635 6,967,419 431,438 9,210 29,279 495,586 2,650 92,202,156

80

Combining Schedule of Net Position, All Funds (Non-GAAP) As of June 30, 2022 (continued)

Enterprise Account

Liabilities Current liabilities: Payments from current assets: Accounts payable and accrued expenses Current portion of compensated absences payable Payments from restricted cash and cash equivalents: Bond interest payable Current portion of long-term obligation Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities: Compensated absences, net of current portion Other post-employment benefits Net pension liability Derivative liability Long-term obligations, net of current maturities Total noncurrent liabilities Total liabilities Deferred inflows of resources Net position

$

Capital Reserve Account

1,690,784 60,000

-

1,750,784

-

823,174 4,049,000 1,408,205 6,280,379

-

8,031,163

-

2,025,949

-

73,358,274 $ 1,028,381

81

Combining Schedule of Net Position, All Funds (Non-GAAP) As of June 30, 2022 (continued) Bond Service Account

$

Construction Account

General Account

Capital Account

Total

-

3,231,935 -

4,600 -

103,636 -

5,030,955 60,000

1,397,744 1,397,744

3,231,935

4,600

6,360,825 6,464,461

1,397,744 6,360,825 12,849,524

-

394,997 394,997

-

809,389 85,211,747 86,021,136

823,174 4,049,000 1,803,202 809,389 85,211,747 92,696,512

1,397,744

3,626,932

4,600

92,485,597

105,546,036

-

709,485

-

-

2,735,434

241,313 $

- $

6,259,891 $

413,178,138 $

494,065,997

82

Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position, All Funds (Non-GAAP) For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 Capital Reserve Account

Enterprise Account Operating revenues: Sewer charges (refunds) Facility and tap fees Miscellaneous Total operating revenues

$

41,484,740 $ 590,084 42,074,824

-

Operating expenses: Operations Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income (loss)

16,259,984 16,259,984 25,814,840

-

Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income Interest expense Gain (Loss) on disposal of surplus property Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) Income (loss) before other transactions

82,913 439,435 522,348 26,337,188

1,648 1,648 1,648

(19,199,365) (652,082)

-

-

-

6,485,741

1,648

66,872,533

1,026,733

Capital contribution Operating transfers Purchase of and transfer capital assets Payment of debt and other long-term obligation: Principal Change in net position

Total net position, beginning of year Total net position, end of year

$

73,358,274 $ 1,028,381

83

Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position, All Funds (Non-GAAP) For the Year Ended June 30, 2022 (continued) Bond Service Account

$

$

Construction Account

- $ -

General Account

- $ -

Capital Account

- $ 5,966,012 70,670 6,036,682

Total

- $ -

41,484,740 5,966,012 660,754 48,111,506

-

90,544 90,544 (90,544)

6,036,682

6,573 12,339,044 12,345,617 (12,345,617)

16,357,101 12,339,044 28,696,145 19,415,361

1,926 (2,949,509) (2,947,583) (2,947,583)

30 30 (90,514)

153 153 6,036,835

331 (20,739) (20,408) (12,366,025)

87,001 (2,949,509) 418,696 (2,443,812) 16,971,549

9,338,068 -

15,215,325 (14,984,686)

3,348,109 (6,037,935) (3,348,109)

683,907 18,984,877

3,348,109 -

(6,120,825)

-

-

6,120,825

-

269,660

140,125

(1,100)

13,423,584

20,319,658

5,990,231

101,188

1,100

399,754,554

473,746,339

6,259,891 $

241,313 $

413,178,138 $

494,065,997

- $

84

This page intentionally left blank.

85

Statistical Section

Introduction This part of MSD’s comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the District’s overall financial health.

Financial Trends These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the District’s financial performance and well-being have changed over time. 

Net Position by Component



Changes in Net Position



General Revenue by Source



Expenses by Function

Revenue Capacity These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the District’s most significant revenue sources. 

Sewer Charge Revenue by Customer Type



Residential Sewer Rates



Principal Commercial Users



Customer Accounts by Member Agency

Debt Capacity These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the District’s current levels of outstanding debt and the District’s ability to issue additional debt in the future. 

Ratio of Outstanding Debt



Revenue Bond Coverage

86

Introduction (continued) Demographic and Economic Information These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the District’s financial activities take place. 

Demographic & Economic Statistics



Personal Income by Industry



Principal Employers

Operating Information These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the District’s financial report relates to the services the District provides and the activities it performs. 

Employees by Division



Operating Indicators by Division

Source: Unless otherwise noted, the information in theses schedules is derived from the comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year.

87

Net Position by Component Fiscal Year Ended June 30

Net Invested in Capital Assets

Restricted

FY 2013-FY 2022

Unrestricted

Total Net Position

2013

289,369,009

5,472,550

23,332,868

318,174,427

2014

273,702,824

6,238,648

50,388,726

330,330,198

2015

290,329,700

6,930,286

47,164,270

344,424,256

2016

310,277,965

6,087,649

44,227,370

360,592,984

2017

324,826,191

5,169,667

48,827,214

378,823,072

2018

318,591,132

6,045,516

69,374,003

394,010,651

2019

337,729,290

11,860,481

64,530,210

414,119,981

2020

360,881,071

6,747,582

64,850,064

432,478,717

2021

399,621,901

7,016,964

67,107,474

473,746,339

2022

412,955,363

7,288,272

73,822,362

494,065,997

88

Changes in Net Position

FY 2013-FY 2022

(Accrual Basis of Accounting)

FISCAL YEAR 2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

Operating revenues: Sewer charges Facility and tap fees

$ 28,268,850 $ 30,287,440 $ 32,617,886 $ 33,679,560 $ 35,521,220 $ 36,891,000 $ 37,393,609 $ 37,371,562 $ 38,591,901 $ 41,484,740 2,566,635 663,003

4,430,475 728,937

4,311,259 757,619

6,324,596 764,928

6,977,097 681,243

5,357,008 745,022

6,343,842 716,441

5,737,611 731,965

5,092,060 1,770,022

5,966,012 660,754

31,498,488

35,446,852

37,686,764

40,769,084

43,179,560

42,993,030

44,453,892

43,841,138

45,453,983

48,111,506

Salaries & employee benefits

6,878,737

7,019,623

6,758,251

7,183,043

7,656,858

7,846,038

8,043,728

8,762,073

8,640,936

8,427,033

Contractual services

1,230,543

1,247,204

1,398,288

1,472,795

1,653,918

1,598,381

1,657,789

1,619,078

1,810,481

1,798,794

Utilities

1,013,310

1,059,709

1,144,711

1,058,299

1,234,029

1,295,636

1,170,937

1,205,899

1,105,110

1,446,493

Repairs and maintenance Other supplies and expenses

971,919 1,616,021

982,524 1,662,793

938,977 1,545,531

998,758 1,500,249

1,019,150 1,736,302

985,838 1,886,837

919,882 1,728,385

975,618 1,559,480

998,183 1,623,222

1,026,018 1,325,837

Insurance claims and expenses

1,963,988 7,965,835

2,109,844 8,310,114

2,682,426 8,543,402

2,990,973 9,332,957

2,467,567 9,929,559

2,765,151 10,393,126

2,528,122 10,659,346

2,106,989 11,337,087

2,351,485 12,394,875

2,332,926 12,339,044

21,640,353

22,391,811

23,011,586

24,537,074

25,697,383

26,771,007

26,708,189

27,566,224

28,924,292

28,696,145

9,858,135

13,055,041

14,675,178

16,232,010

17,482,177

16,222,023

17,745,703

16,274,914

16,529,691

19,415,361

Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses:

Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment Income Interest Expense Amortization of bond issuance costs

507,644

175,797

209,220

237,604

343,988

960,222

1,844,280

1,215,565

30,582

87,001

(2,132,131)

(2,104,758)

(2,771,525)

(2,586,670)

(2,794,077)

(3,515,801)

(3,399,735)

(3,292,282)

(3,110,487)

(2,949,509)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(393,694) 14,410

(434,357) 67,663

17,258

(106,997)

(280,337)

(355,583) 10,187

(434,989)

(121,183)

322,770

418,696

Total nonoperating revenues (expenses)

(2,003,771)

(2,295,655)

(2,545,047)

(2,456,063)

(2,730,426)

(2,900,975)

(1,990,444)

(2,197,900)

(2,757,135)

(2,443,812)

Income before contributions & special items

7,854,364

10,759,386

12,130,131

13,775,947

14,751,751

13,321,048

15,755,259

14,077,014

13,772,656

16,971,549

Capital contribution

3,217,846

1,396,385

3,078,520

2,392,781

3,478,337

3,222,031

4,354,071

4,281,722

7,558,647

3,348,109

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

19,936,419

-

Bond issuance costs Gain (loss) on sale of surplus property

Special Item - Cane Creek Water and Sewer District asset contribution from Henderson County Change in Net Position

-

$ 11,072,210 $ 12,155,771 $ 15,208,651 $ 16,168,728 $ 18,230,088 $ 16,543,079 $ 20,109,330 $ 18,358,736 $ 41,267,622 $ 20,319,658

89

General Revenues by Source Fiscal Year Ended June 30

Industrial Sewer Charges

Domestic Sewer Charges

Facility & Tap Fees

FY 2013-FY 2022

Miscellaneous

Total

2013

1,577,916

26,690,934

2,566,635

1,185,057

32,020,542

2014

1,758,818

28,528,622

4,430,475

972,397

35,690,312

2015

3,725,584

28,892,302

4,311,259

984,097

37,913,242

2016

3,344,074

30,335,486

6,324,596

895,535

40,899,691

2017

3,909,925

31,611,295

6,977,097

744,894

43,243,211

2018

4,159,767

32,731,233

5,357,008

1,715,431

43,963,439

2019

3,687,703

33,705,906

6,343,842

2,125,732

45,863,183

2020

3,426,103

33,945,459

5,737,611

1,826,347

44,935,520

2021

3,497,070

35,094,831

5,092,060

2,123,374

45,807,335

2022

3,816,103

37,668,637

5,966,012

1,166,451

48,617,203

Note: Does not include Capital Contributions.

90

Expenses by Function (Non-GAAP) Fiscal Year Ended June 30

Operating Expenses 1

Capital Improvement 2

FY 2013-FY 2022

Capital Contributions 3

Debt Service 4

Total

2013

13,674,518

14,988,922

3,217,846

6,553,956

38,435,242

2014

14,081,697

12,701,810

1,396,385

6,464,583

34,644,475

2015

14,468,184

16,455,653

3,078,520

8,154,350

42,156,707

2016

15,204,117

19,201,501

2,392,781

8,722,495

45,520,894

2017

15,767,824

14,631,155

3,478,337

8,069,902

41,947,218

2018

16,536,830

22,528,740

3,222,031

7,841,626

50,129,227

2019

16,315,760

20,860,363

4,354,071

8,505,560

50,035,754

2020

16,158,239

23,629,714

4,281,722

8,558,107

52,627,782

2021

16,441,116

18,377,093

27,495,566

8,966,312

71,280,087

2022

16,698,185

14,984,686

3,348,109

9,070,334

44,101,314

1

Includes general operations

2

Excludes depreciation expense

3

This includes collection system infrastructure contributed by developers and Cane Creek Water and Sewer District asset contribution from Henderson County

4

Includes Bond Principal Expense and Bond Interest Less Capitalized Interest Portion and excludes early retirement of long-term debt

91

Sewer Charge Revenue

by Customer Type

FY 2013-FY 2022

FISCAL YEAR 2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

Domestic Users Asheville $ 20,856,426 $ 21,527,715 $ 22,423,891 $ 23,494,692 $ 24,518,045 $ 25,487,028 $ 26,164,545 $ 26,484,060 $ 26,860,749 $ 28,377,007 Biltmore Forest 316,932 318,743 366,741 366,135 348,323 322,377 326,587 346,937 317,195 356,509 Black Mountain 984,242 1,001,650 1,052,869 1,069,901 1,096,604 1,169,878 1,195,893 1,244,835 1,256,334 1,364,224 Henderson County 718,582 1,129,721 1,203,477 1,250,146 1,447,613 1,493,912 1,535,675 1,431,015 1,403,908 1,743,209 Montreat 278,739 243,406 256,944 260,871 268,045 244,133 290,989 278,707 247,890 247,366 Weaverville 660,062 671,221 749,113 814,691 887,368 932,060 1,007,833 1,030,505 1,007,754 1,143,222 Woodfin Sanitary Water & Sewer 989,107 District 1,024,986 1,049,061 1,084,717 1,120,014 1,171,111 1,198,467 1,201,332 1,251,937 1,204,637 Other

1,886,844

2,611,180

1,790,206

1,994,333

1,925,283

1,910,734

1,985,917

1,928,068

2,749,064

3,232,463

Industrial Users

1,577,916

1,758,818

3,725,584

3,344,074

3,909,925

4,159,767

3,687,703

3,426,103

3,497,070

3,816,103

Total

$ 28,268,850 $ 30,287,440 $ 32,617,886 $ 33,679,560 $ 35,521,220 $ 36,891,000 $ 37,393,609 $ 37,371,562 $ 38,591,901 $ 41,484,740

Note: Municipalities include sewer charges on water bills. "Other" represents sewer charges billed directly

by MSD to domestic users.

92

Customer Accounts

by Member Agency

FY 2013-FY 2022

FISCAL YEAR 2013 Asheville

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

40,420 40,620 41,020 41,634 42,242 42,298 42,842 42,866 43,587 44,376

Biltmore Forest

650

650

653

662

649

649

653

658

658

662

Black Mountain

2,637

2,647

2,642

2,729

2,788

2,854

2,908

2,981

3,505

3,587

Henderson County

3,275

3,417

3,512

3,774

3,898

3,964

3,911

4,201

3,345

3,374

671

663

666

666

669

669

674

677

678

680

Weaverville

2,376

1,694

1,740

1,779

1,830

1,901

1,901

2,126

2,224

2,309

Woodfin Sanitary Water & Sewer District

2,353

2,422

2,469

2,527

2,557

2,567

2,616

2,686

2,969

3,151

Montreat

Total

52,382 52,113 52,702 53,771 54,633 54,902 55,505 56,195 56,966 58,139

Source: Member Agencies

93

Residential Sewer Rates

FY 2013-FY 2022

Fiscal Year Ended June 30

Monthly Base Rate

Rate Per 1,000 Gallons

Average Monthly Billing

2013

6.13

5.32

27.14

2014

6.28

5.45

27.81

2015

6.44

5.59

28.49

2016

6.60

5.72

29.15

2017

6.77

5.87

29.88

2018

6.94

6.02

30.62

2019

7.11

6.16

31.36

2020

7.29

6.32

32.17

2021

7.29

6.32

32.17

2022

7.49

6.50

33.04

Note: Rates are based on 5/8" meter, which is the standard household meter size. The District charges a higher base rate for larger meters. Each municipality will set its own water rates.

94

Principal Commercial Users

FY 2013 & FY 2022 2013

Commercial User

Milkco, Inc.

Total Charges

Type of Business

Dairy Products & Juices

Sierra Nevada

Micro-Brewery Manufacturer

Jacob Holm Industries America

Textile Manufacturer

Duke Energy Progress LLC

Energy Provider

New Belgium Brewing

Micro-Brewery Manufacturer

Ridgecrest Baptist Conference Center

Christian Conference Center

University of North Carolina - Asheville

University

BONAR

Chemical Manufacturer

$

486,928

2022

Rank

Percentage of Total Charges

1

1.72%

-------------------------------------108,275

6

0.38%

--------------------------------------------------------------------------173,986

3

0.62%

-------------------------------------104,016

9

0.37%

Total Charges $

Rank

Percentage of Total Charges

864,419

1

2.08%

348,516

2

0.84%

322,923

3

0.78%

283,489

4

0.68%

242,485

5

0.58%

196,904

6

0.47%

178,661

7

0.43%

171,372

8

0.41%

148,965

9

0.36%

- (formerly Colbond) Arcadia Beverage

Beverage Supplier for local/global retailers

The Biltmore Company

Tourist Attraction/Winery/Resort Services

VA Medical Center

Veterans Hospital

-------------------------------------10

0.26%

146,076

10

0.35%

107,367

74,364

8

0.38%

175,478

5

0.42%

- Asheville Department of Veterans Affairs Givens Estates, Inc.

Continuing Care Retirement Community

139,403

4

0.49%

136,826

9

0.33%

Mission Health System

Health & Emergency Services

257,420

2

0.91%

126,279

10

0.30%

Cooperative Laundry Services

Laundry Services Provider

110,296

5

0.39%

Flint Group

Textile Machine Parts

--------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

- (formerly Day International) Continental Automotive Systems

Automotive Parts Manufacturer

TOTAL

107,558 $ 1,669,613

7

0.38% 5.91%

-------------------------------------$ 3,342,393

8.06%

Source: District Billing Records

95

Ratio of Outstanding Debt Fiscal Year Ended June 30

Total Outstanding 1 Debt

FY 2013-FY 2022

Debt Per 2 Capita

Per Capita 3 Income

Percentage of Personal Income

2013

86,909,009

721

37,973

1.90%

2014

110,407,625

921

40,604

2.27%

2015

104,325,293

857

43,006

1.99%

2016

97,627,539

789

44,478

1.77%

2017

91,896,562

731

46,297

1.58%

2018

115,148,090

912

48,936

1.86%

2019

109,315,483

856

50,690

1.69%

2020

103,385,018

800

53,309

1.50%

2021

96,960,999

740

Unavailable

Unavailable

2022

90,356,267

676

Unavailable

Unavailable

1

Calculations derived from the balance of outstanding debt in Note 3 less the unamortized bond refunding charges in Note 11

2

This ratio was calculated by using the number of domestic accounts and multiplying by Buncombe County census average of 2.3 persons per household to get the number of users in the District.

3

Regional Economic Information System, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce

See Personal Income by Industry on page 100 to assess economic base of the County.

96

Revenue Bond Coverage

FY 2013-FY 2022

From 1985 to 2002, the District was subject to Section 501 of the 1985 Bond Order which covenants that the District will set rates to produce sufficient revenues, together with any other available funds, including the amounts transferred by the District from the General Fund to the Revenue Fund, to permit the deposit and transfer to the credit of the Revenue Fund in the then current fiscal year of a sum at least equal to the total of the following: 1. the current expenses of the Sewerage System for the current fiscal year, and 2. to provide for the higher of either: a. the amounts needed for making the required cash deposits in each fiscal year to the credit of the several accounts in the Bond Service Fund and to the credit of the Subordinated Indebtedness Service Fund, the Debt Service Reserve Fund, and the Maintenance Reserve Fund, or b. one hundred twenty per centum (120%) of the amount of the principal and interest requirements for the current fiscal year on account of the indebtedness then outstanding excluding principal and interest requirements on account of indebtedness incurred to finance improvements or additional improvements which have not been completed as of the beginning of such fiscal year.

However, with the issuance of refunding bonds on April 3, 2003, a sufficient amount of debt subject to the 1985 bond order was defeased allowing application of the 1999 Amended Bond Order whose rate covenant is summarized in the following paragraph.

The District covenants to set rates and charges so that the Income Available for Debt Service (defined as the excess of “Revenues” over “Current Expenses”) will not be less than the greater of (i) one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Long-Term Debt Service Requirement for Parity Indebtedness only for such Fiscal Year and (ii) one hundred percent (100%) of the Long-Term Debt Service Requirement for Parity Indebtedness and Subordinated Indebtedness for such Fiscal Year. The definition of revenues for this purpose does not include grants, contributions, investment income credited to non-operating funds, or tap and connection fees. Current expenditures include operating expenses other than additions to reserve funds, depreciation or amortization, or debt service payments.

97

Revenue Bond Coverage

FY 2013-FY 2022

The District does not currently have any subordinated indebtedness, so the computation of the current fiscal year’s compliance with this covenant is based solely on 120% of the debt service requirement.

Long-Term Debt Service Requirement is defined as interest and principal required to be remitted to the Trustee, except that interest shall be excluded from the determination of Long-Term Debt Service Requirement to the extent the same is provided from the proceeds of the Long-Term Indebtedness. The coverage ratio is computed on the basis of 100% of required debt service.

Fiscal Year Ended June 30

Adjusted Revenues (B)

Income Available for Debt Service

2013

29,075,493

14,013,024

15,062,469

8,114,665

9,737,598

6,947,804

1.86

2014

31,096,483

14,302,479

16,794,004

8,408,166

10,089,799

8,385,838

2.00

2015

33,428,669

15,179,802

18,248,867

10,184,460

12,221,352

8,064,407

1.79

2016

34,529,568

15,688,258

18,841,310

9,003,519

10,804,223

9,837,791

2.09

2017

36,402,135

16,280,644

20,121,491

7,918,557

9,502,268

12,202,934

2.54

2018

38,102,682

16,536,830

21,565,852

9,423,689

11,308,427

12,142,163

2.29

2019

39,379,533

16,315,760

23,063,773

9,412,540

11,295,048

13,651,233

2.45

2020

39,022,654

16,158,239

22,864,415

9,826,547

11,791,856

13,037,868

2.33

2021

40,325,772

16,441,116

23,884,656

9,811,696

11,774,035

14,072,960

2.43

2022

42,157,737

16,698,185

25,459,552

9,797,850

11,757,420

15,661,702

2.60

Long-Term Debt Service Requirement

120% of LongTerm Debt Service Requirement

Excess of Income Available for Debt over Debt Service

Adjusted Current Expenses (A)

Coverage Ratio

(A) Includes all operation and maintenance expenses, except depreciation.

(B) Does not include tap and connection fees, grants, contributions, investment income allocated to nonoperating funds.

98

Demographic & Economic Statistics

FY 2013-FY 2022 Civilian Labor Force 3

Fiscal Year Ended June 30

Population Estimates 2

Per Capita Income 2

Median Age 1

Employed

Unemployed

Unemployment Rate

2013

246,952

38,141

40.8

121,521

7,929

6.1%

2014

249,265

40,797

41.0

122,480

5,898

4.6%

2015

252,160

42,996

41.1

125,355

6,131

4.7%

2016

255,222

44,403

41.7

129,324

5,412

4.0%

2017

257,408

46,323

42.9

130,418

4,801

3.6%

2018

259,726

48,819

42.1

133,710

4,501

3.3%

2019

262,049

50,804

42.2

135,749

4,554

3.2%

2020

263,477

53,309

42.3

116,658

16,817

12.6%

2021

Unavailable

Unavailable

Unavailable

129,655

6,648

4.9%

2022

Unavailable

Unavailable

Unavailable

136,819

4,682

3.3%

Note: The information above is for Buncombe County, North Carolina. The District believes that the above information is representative of the service area, which extends over approximately 80% of the county.

Statistical data for population estimate/per capita personal income/median age for calendar years 2021 & 2022 were not available at the time of this report.

Sources: 1

United States Census Bureau

2

Regional Economic Information System, Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce; Last updated: November 16, 2021-- new statistics for 2020; revised statistics for 1998-2019.

3

U.S. Department of Labor - Bureau of Labor Statistics; Local Area Unemployment Statistics

99

Personal Income by Industry

CY 2013-CY 2022 Calendar Year

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

6,660,087

7,176,254

7,621,291

8,065,982

8,400,972

8,939,875

9,453,923

9,337,100

22,660

27,151

30,283

25,504

28,661

17,224

24,586

34,299

-

-

Nonfarm earnings

6,637,427

7,149,103

7,591,008

8,040,478

8,372,311

8,922,651

9,429,337

9,302,801

-

-

Private earnings Agricultural services, forestry, fishing Mining Construction

5,580,792 5,757 5,828 348,820

6,093,426 5,924 6,370 392,983

6,523,410 5,929 6,585 448,839

6,952,063 6,627 4,914 477,954

7,233,928 7,036 6,141 529,089

7,712,694 7,380 5,441 623,861

8,166,411 5,928 6,032 692,455

7,961,678 8,288 5,982 636,325

-

-

705,620 507,469 198,151

757,644 536,048 221,596

821,492 541,045 280,447

836,339 530,183 306,156

862,114 553,542 308,572

912,148 596,298 315,850

983,570 645,581 337,989

966,205 638,867 327,338

-

-

214,617 526,884 253,686 3,519,580

236,067 557,906 265,025 3,871,507

248,576 593,659 302,007 4,096,323

255,030 631,294 267,878 4,472,027

265,004 652,947 295,011 4,616,586

269,683 678,692 303,259 4,912,230

278,843 692,068 322,035 5,183,749

273,254 708,733 324,524 5,038,367

-

-

1,056,635 321,224 25,501 709,910

1,055,677 315,026 24,683 715,968

1,067,598 316,318 23,637 727,643

1,088,415 323,143 24,235 741,037

1,138,383 336,206 24,652 777,525

1,209,957 361,488 27,932 820,537

1,262,926 394,451 29,184 839,291

1,341,123 454,291 30,608 856,224

-

-

Total Personal Income Farm earnings

Manufacturing: Durable goods Nondurable goods Wholesale trade Retail Trade Transportation and public utilities Services Government and government enterprises: Federal, civilian Military State and local

2021

2022

Unavailable

Unavailable

Note: The above data is for Buncombe County, North Carolina. MSD believes the data is representative of the entire service area. Growth in personal income over time may be compared to average monthly billing to evaluate the affordability of sewer rates for customers.

Source: Regional Economic Accounts, Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Department of Commerce; Last updated: November 16, 2021-- new statistics for 2020; revised statistics for 2001-2019.

100

Principal Employers

FY 2013-FY 2022 FY 2013

Employer

Employees

Rank

Mission Health System & Hospitals

6,994

1

Ingles Markets, Inc.

1,137

FY 2022 % of Total County Employment

% of Total County Employment

Employees*

Rank

5.81%

1,000+

1

0.73%

6

0.95%

1,000+

2

0.73%

-

-

-

1,000+

3

0.73%

VA Medical Center - Asheville

1,593

4

1.32%

1,000+

4

0.73%

The Biltmore Company

1,770

3

1.47%

1,000+

5

0.73%

Buncombe County Government

1,380

5

1.15%

1,000+

6

0.73%

City of Asheville

1,000

9

0.84%

1,000+

7

0.73%

Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

-

-

-

1,000+

8

0.73%

Eaton Corporation

-

-

-

500-999

9

0.36%-0.73%

Kendro Laboratory Products Lp

-

-

-

500-999

10

0.36%-0.73%

11.54%

9,000 - 9,998

Buncombe County Board of Education

Total for Principal Employers

13,874

6.56%-7.3%

* Employee range is the only public information available

Note: The information above is for Buncombe County, North Carolina. The District believes that the above information is representative of the entire service area, which extends over approximately 80% of the County.

Source: Asheville Area Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Department & NC Employment Security Commission

101

Employees by Division (FTE’s) Department

FY 2013-FY 2022 FISCAL YEAR

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Office of the General Manager Office Support

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

Human Resources Department Human Resource Environmental, Health & Safety

3 2

3 2

3 2

3 2

3 2

3 2

3 2

4 2

4 2

4 2

Information Technology Department IT & MIS Geographic Information Systems

5 4

5 4

5 4

5 4

5 4

5 4

5 4

5 4

5 4

5 4

Financial Services Department Finance & Budget Accounting, Investments & Cash Flow Mgmt.

Purchasing & Warehouse Fleet Maintenance Structural Maintenance

1 3 3 4 6

1 4 3 4 6

1 4 3 4 6

1 4 3 4 6

1 3 3 4 6

1 3 2 4 6

1 3 2 4 6

1 3 2 4 6

1 3 2 4 6

1 3 2 4 6

Water Reclamation Facility Office Support Plant Operations Industrial Waste

0 11 5

0 10 5

0 11 5

1 11 5

1 12 5

1 12 5

1 12 5

1 13 3

1 13 4

1 13 4

System Services Department Office Support Pump Station Maintenance Mechanical Maintenance Electrical Maintenance/Hydro Construction Administration System Services

4 0 0 16 5 51

4 0 0 15 5 51

4 0 0 12 5 54

4 0 7 7 5 51

4 3 7 4 5 54

4 3 7 4 6 54

4 4 7 4 6 54

4 5 8 4 6 54

4 5 8 4 6 54

4 5 8 4 6 54

Engineering Services Department Office Support Right of Way Planning and Development Design and Drafting Engineers

1 3 5 3 3

1 3 5 3 4

1 3 3 3 5

1 3 4 3 4

0 3 3 3 4

0 3 4 3 4

0 3 4 3 4

0 3 4 3 4

0 3 4 3 4

0 3 4 3 4

Management Division Heads General Manager

8 1

8 1

7 1

7 1

7 1

7 1

7 1

7 1

7 1

7 1

148

148

147

147

148

148

149

151

152

152

Total

Note: All employees are considered full time based on 2080 hours worked per year. Above numbers represent budgeted positions and may include vacancies at year-end.

Source: District Personnel Records.

102

Operating Indicators by Division

FY 2013-FY 2022 FISCAL YEAR

DEPARTMENT

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

Engineering Services Department Sewer Tap Applications

1,356

1,594

1,382

1,177

1,631

1,443

1,169

1,004

1,204

1,123

92

69

62

66

76

78

68

69

60

63

Linear Feet of rehabilitated Sewer Systems

43,519

51,110

46,729

42,675

49,782

49,918

44,790

30,041

34,506

22,627

Linear Feet of Accepted Sewer Systems

44,309

18,314

29,185

43,616

32,945

39,888

48,455

23,699

34,000

27,308

5

12

5

5

5

5

5

2

1

2

3.46

7.85

3.48

3.48

3.48

3.46

3.46

0.00

0.00

1.28

0.51

0.52

0.55

0.52

0.52

0.51

0.51

0.51

0.52

0.57

807,746

699,543

729,451

730,000

885,687

1,124,220

900,249

905,778

917,978

874,899

Construction Repairs to Sewer Lines

507

589

543

500

555

508

493

380

466

433

Taps Installed

199

218

239

234

358

351

324

294

285

317

Manhole Repairs

342

355

376

294

330

323

286

217

183

178

Sanitary Sewer Overflows

37

36

37

53

30

25

40

19

11

26

Pump Stations

32

32

32

31

30

30

30

31

41

40

977

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,020

1,027

1,043

1,041

1,130

1,140

7,993.50

8,358.50

6,971.50

7,884.00

7,117.50

7,592.00

9,453.50

8,541.00

7,993.50

7,884.00

Daily (average) flow treated (millions of gallons daily)

21.9

22.9

19.1

21.6

19.5

20.8

25.9

23.4

21.9

21.6

Maximum daily flow treated (millions of gallons daily)

62.1

74.6

39.0

67.1

53.0

64.8

67.5

67.2

67.3

53.7

54.8%

57.3%

47.8%

54.0%

48.8%

52.0%

64.8%

58.5%

54.8%

54.0%

Plans Reviewed

Human Resources Department Number of workforce injuries Lost Work Rate per 100 employees

System Services Department Average Response Time to sewer problem (hours) Lines Washed (lineal feet) - in-house only

Water Reclamation Facility Sanitary Sewers (approximate miles) Treatment Provided (millions of gallons)

Percentage of plant capacity used Cost per millions of gallons treated

$

617 $

614 $

735 $

735 $

767 $

718 $

554 $

729 $

708 $

588

Energy cost per millions of gallons treated

$

119 $

101 $

115 $

96 $

117 $

121 $

107 $

111 $

91 $

140

93%

96%

97%

97%

97%

95%

94%

Total suspended solids (TSS) removal efficiency (%)

97%

93%

Source: District Operational Records

103

94%

Compliance Section

104

105