A4 Friday, July 29, 2022 Mountain Democrat mtdemocrat.com
OPINION
Richard B. Esposito Publisher
Noel Stack Managing Editor
Krysten Kellum Editor
California Matters
Bullet train project given a reprieve
I
n 2019, just weeks after being inaugurated as California’s governor, Gavin Newsom issued what many took as a death knell for the state’s troubled bullet train project. “But let’s be real,” Newsom told legislators in his first State of the Dan Walters State address. “The current project, as planned, would cost too much and respectfully take too long. There’s been too little oversight and not enough transparency. “Right now, there simply isn’t a path to get from Sacramento to San Diego, let alone from San Francisco to L.A.,” Newsom said. “I wish there were. However, we do have the capacity to complete a high-speed rail link between Merced and Bakersfield.” It seemed as though Newsom wanted to finish the initial phase in the San Joaquin Valley and then give up on a statewide link between the San Francisco Bay Area (and perhaps Sacramento) and Southern California. The reaction from project supporters, particularly construction unions, was swift and sharply negative and Newsom claimed that reporters misinterpreted his intentions. “I just think people in the media should pause before they run headlines and actually consider the California’s facts and maybe even ask the person that’s stating much-troubled things before they run bullet train with things,” Newsom project has said. “That’s the deep lesson I learned in this.” gotten a reprieve He insisted that he with a political wasn’t abandoning a deal to free up statewide system, but wanted to concentrate $4.2 billion in first on completing a bond money but working portion in the it still faces years San Joaquin Valley. That limited goal, of uncertainty however, also has vexed over its fate. the governor as costs continued to rise and work slowed to a crawl. Seizing on Newsom’s words, President Donald Trump’s administration tried to claw back a nearly $1 billion federal grant for the project that predecessor Barack Obama had awarded. When Joe Biden became president, the grant was restored. Last year Newsom asked the Legislature to appropriate the $4.2 billion remainder of a $9.95 billion bond issue that voters approved in 2008 to build the system, but legislative leaders balked, saying, in essence, that it would be money down a rathole and would be better spent on local and regional transit projects.
Summary
n
See Walters, page A5
Letters to the Editor Failed presidency EDITOR: y now I think almost everyone who is paying attention has come to the conclusion that our disgraced former president was more interested in fomenting the Capitol riot than trying to restrain it. As someone who swore allegiance to protect and defend our Constitution, I never expected to experience a president who took that same oath and ignored it to, instead, build a cult of personality to defend himself. My hope is that most of Mr. Trump’s supporters have come to the same conclusion as many of his staff — that his self-interest far outweighed any loyalty to the Constitution or his country. The disaster of his presidency will outlive many of us, including his lifetime appointees to the Supreme Court. It is now our responsibility to ensure that we never make this same mistake again. ROB PURDIE Col. USAF (ret.), Cameron Park
B
Gun violence EDITOR:
“W
e must love our children more than our guns, profit or power.” — Cory Booker, U.S. Senator The Centers for Disease Control has reported that in 2020 there were more than 45,000 deaths due to gun violence with an average of 123 people dying daily. Those who advocate for unlimited ownership of guns base their justification for such ownership on three arguments. The first, of course, is the Second Amendment. Unfortunately, the language of the amendment is vague. While it does allow for gun ownership, the intent is the formation of militias to protect a nascent nation without a formal military to protect itself against foreign enemies and internal conflict. The focus was not on individual gun ownership. Certainly, the intent was not to allow gun owners to use assault weapons to kill children in their classrooms. I sincerely believe that those who wrote the Second Amendment would be appalled at the carnage taking place in our country. The second argument is that the more guns we have, the safer we will be. If that were true, with
an estimated 400 million civilian-owned guns, we should be extremely safe. As logic would dictate, studies show the opposite is true — that there is a direct correlation between the number of guns and the rate of deaths by gun violence including suicide, accidental deaths, deaths involving domestic violence, mass shootings, etc. The more guns there are, the more opportunity for guns to get into the wrong hands. The third is a good guy with a gun argument. Because shootings happen so quickly and usually last only a few minutes, a good guy with a gun can rarely get there before multiple people have been killed and wounded. In addition, a handgun is not much use against a person with an assault weapon in a bulletproof vest. In a recent study of 433 mass shootings, only 22 were stopped by a good guy with a gun and only 12 of those had no military or police experience. The choice is ours, to continue to lose 123 people a day to gun violence or to finally do something to keep guns out of the wrong hands. To put an end to this madness, please contact your representatives in Congress and urge them to enact the laws necessary to stop the carnage and to vote for candidates who will also support stricter gun laws. No right is absolute, including freedom of speech. Gun ownership should be for those who can prove they are sane, law-abiding and responsible enough to own a gun. SCOTT TAYLOR Placerville
We’re burning up EDITOR: ecord heat waves in America and Europe endanger millions, as wildfires rage, in a brutal manifestation of man-induced global warming. Each of us can reduce our personal contribution by cutting back on consumption of animal foods, which account for a whopping portion of “greenhouse gases.” Carbon dioxide is released by burning forests to create animal pastures. Methane and nitrous oxide are released from digestive tracts of cows and sheep and from animal waste pits. In an environmentally sustainable world,
R
n
See Letters, page A5
Guest Column
COVID shutdowns renew interest in school choice
A
enriched by teaching at t least the home. The education pandemic had establishment sneers a silver lining. at home schooling, It taught but home-schooled parents that there are students, even though better alternatives to they are more likely government schools. to be poor, score 30% When COVID hit, higher on SATs. They bureaucrats in control also do better in college were eager to close and are less likely to schools. Many closed drink or do drugs. them if just one child John Stossel Finally, even within tested positive, even government systems, though COVID is little school choice grew. threat to kids. Kansas and Missouri expanded Union teachers seemed eager to access to charter schools. be paid not to work. Los Angeles Georgia, Louisiana, Oklahoma, teachers secured a contract that states Pennsylvania, Iowa, South Dakota, they will “not be required to teach Utah and Tennessee expanded classes using live video conferencing,” Education Savings Accounts, which and won’t be required to “provide help parents try private schools. instruction more than four hours a Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signed day.” Nice work if you can get it. “the most expansive school choice More than a million parents chose legislation in the nation.” It gives to leave the government system. They money to families that they can spend spent their own money to educate on private school, home schooling, their children in private and religious micro schools, tutoring or any other schools. educational service that meets the Others tried home schooling. needs of kids. Any kid can qualify. Many had been skeptical but now The state simply gives the family what discovered that their kids learned they would have spent in the public more and their family life was
The Mountain Democrat welcomes letters up to 300 words. Letters may be edited. We reserve the right to edit submissions. Include your name, address and phone number for verification purposes.
Email: editor@ mtdemocrat.net
The education establishment sneers at home schooling, but home-schooled students, even though they are more likely to be poor, score 30% higher on SATs. school (up to $7,000). That’s much more generous and simpler than other states choice plans. In San Francisco, voters recalled three school board members. Apparently voters did not like that they kept public schools closed and, instead of figuring out how to reopen, obsessed over renaming schools called Washington or Lincoln. In Virginia, voters rejected governor Terry McAuliffe after he said, “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach.” His opponent, Glenn Youngkin said, “Parents should be in charge of their kids’ education.” Youngkin won. “For far too long in K-12 education, the only special interest group has been the teachers unions,” wrote the Reason Foundation’s Corey DeAngelis in The Wall Street Journal. “Now, there’s a new interest group — parents. They are never going to unsee what they saw in 2020 and 2021 and they’re going to fight to
make sure they never feel powerless when it comes to their children’s education again.” Of course, union leaders hate the choice movement. American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten calls it racist. “The real ‘pioneers’ of private school choice were the white politicians who resisted school integration,” she wrote. Today’s choice programs are “polite cousins of segregation.” But that’s nonsense. “Don’t tell me school choice is racist,” said Denisha Merriweather, founder of the new group Black Minds Matter. “(Choice opponents) are implying that parents, especially lower-income, Black parents, should stay trapped in public schools that have failed their children for decades ... We need a new system ... empowered by parents.” School choice increases diversity,
Snail Mail: Letters to the Editor P. O. Box 1088, Placerville 95667
n
See Stossel, page A5
Main Office: 2889 Ray Lawyer Drive Placerville 95667
